Statement of the Technical Field
The inventive arrangements relate to recoil absorbing mechanism. More particularly, the inventive arrangements concern recoil absorbing mechanisms useful with Recoil Producing Devices (“RPDs”), such as energetic disruptors.
Description of the Related Art
There are various robotic platforms known in the art that comprise energetic disruptors (e.g., water jet disruptors) for inspecting and rendering threatening items (e.g., bombs) safe. Such robotic platforms are employed in various applications. Conventionally, robotic platforms have been used by police, bomb squads, and military personnel. Use of conventional energetic disruptors is difficult.
In some cases, the deployment platform comprises a tripod-like assembly which needs to be manually placed near a suspicious item, whereby the operator is placed in harm's way. The tripod-like assembly has a limited set of firing locations and elevations.
In other cases, the robotic platform comprises a movable arm to which the energetic disruptor is fixedly attached at a given location thereon. The movable arm does allow the energetic disruptor to be easily repositioned and aimed. However, the movable arm is over designed for all other applications of use thereof because it has to be strong enough to withstand the brief, high impulse load applied thereto when the energetic disruptor is shot. In effect, the robot is undesirably heavy and bulky. Also, the disruptor is attached to the movable arm so as to have a fixed position adjacent to a distal end thereof. In effect, the disruptor may interfere with other operations in which the movable arm is being employed. Additionally, the energetic disruptor applies a relatively high impulse load to the movable arm when shot. The high impulse load may cause damage to the movable arm.
In yet other cases, the disruptor is mounted to a robotic arm with a recoil absorber. The recoil absorber does decrease the impulse load on the robot. However, the conventional recoil absorber designs are long and bulky. The amount of stroke in the conventional recoil absorber designs is relatively small in comparison to the overall bulk of the device. A lot of times, the robotic arm comprises a gripper at a distal end thereof. The disruptor may interfere with gripper operations and/or damage the gripper when shot.
One conventional recoil absorber comprises a coil spring and damper. The damper is necessary to even out the shock load and dissipate energy. The issue with the spring/damper design is that: the damper adds an undesirable amount of weight and bulk to the design; and the design has a poor length ratio between the stroke length of the recoil absorber and the total length of the recoil absorber.
The invention concerns implementing systems and methods for recoil absorption. The methods comprise causing a moving carrier to freely travel linearly in a first direction by discharging at least one RPD (e.g., a disruptor). An impulse force resulting from the RPD's discharge is absorbed using at least one spring (e.g., a constant force spring or a coil spring). The spring has a first end coupled to the moving carrier and a second end coupled to a fixed frame member. A pulling force is applied by the spring to the moving carrier in a second direction opposed from the first direction at an end of spring travel. Consequently, a uni-directional force transfer mechanism is caused to engage an elongate latching element (e.g., a threaded or notched rod) so as to latch the moving carrier in position and prevent the moving carrier from freely traveling in the second direction.
The moving carrier can then be caused to travel linearly in the second direction by rotating the elongate latching element or pushing the elongate latching element in the second direction. Such rotation or pushing causes the uni-directional force transfer mechanism to be displaced along a length of the latching element.
In some scenarios, the uni-directional force transfer mechanism comprises a split nut attached to a rigid support structure via mechanical spring elements. Additionally or alternatively, the uni-directional force transfer mechanism comprises a plurality of flexible fins engaging threads or notches formed along a length of the elongate latching element. A sensor may be provided to sense a position of the moving carrier along a length of the elongate latching element.
Embodiments will be described with reference to the following drawing figures, in which like numerals represent like items throughout the figures, and in which:
It will be readily understood that the components of the embodiments as generally described herein and illustrated in the appended figures could be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Thus, the following more detailed description of various embodiments, as represented in the figures, is not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure, but is merely representative of various embodiments. While the various aspects of the embodiments are presented in drawings, the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale unless specifically indicated.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by this detailed description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Reference throughout this specification to features, advantages, or similar language does not imply that all of the features and advantages that may be realized with the present invention should be or are in any single embodiment of the invention. Rather, language referring to the features and advantages is understood to mean that a specific feature, advantage, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, discussions of the features and advantages, and similar language, throughout the specification may, but do not necessarily, refer to the same embodiment.
Furthermore, the described features, advantages and characteristics of the invention may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, in light of the description herein, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific features or advantages of a particular embodiment. In other instances, additional features and advantages may be recognized in certain embodiments that may not be present in all embodiments of the invention.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, or similar language means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the indicated embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the phrases “in one embodiment”, “in an embodiment”, and similar language throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, all refer to the same embodiment.
As used in this document, the singular form “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meanings as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. As used in this document, the term “comprising” means “including, but not limited to”.
The present invention concerns systems and methods for recoil absorption. The systems comprise a RPD coupled to a moving carrier. The term “RPD”, as used herein, reference to any device that produces recoil. An example of such a device is a disruptor or a weapon from which something is propelled (e.g., water, bullets, shells, missiles, etc.). As a result of discharging the RPD device (e.g., a disruptor), a moving carrier is caused to freely travel linearly in a first direction. An impulse force resulting from the RPD's discharge is absorbed using at least one spring (e.g., a constant force spring or a coil spring). The spring has a first end coupled to the moving carrier and a second end coupled to a fixed frame member. A pulling force is applied by the spring to the moving carrier in a second direction opposed from the first direction at an end of spring travel. Consequently, a uni-directional force transfer mechanism is caused to engage an elongate latching element (e.g., a threaded or notched rod) so as to latch the moving carrier in position and prevent the moving carrier from freely traveling in the second direction. The moving carrier can then be caused to travel linearly in the second direction by rotating the elongate latching element or pushing the elongate latching element in the second direction. Such rotation or pushing causes the uni-directional force transfer mechanism to be displaced along a length of the latching element.
Referring now to
The robotic assembly 100 is configured to act as a robotic gripping mechanism for remote investigation of items and an explosive disruption mechanism for remotely disarming explosive devices (e.g., pipe bombs, letter bombs, hand grenades, land mines, etc.). The robotic gripping mechanism comprises a gripper 104 coupled to a distal end of the robotic arm 102. Grippers are well known in the art, and therefore will not be described herein. Any known or to be known gripper can be used herein without limitation.
The explosive disruption mechanism comprises an Explosive Disruption Assembly (“EDA”) 108 coupled to the robotic arm 102. The EDA 108 is coupled to the robotic arm via mounting structures 202. The mounting structures 202 may each comprise a plate 116 with apertures 204 formed therein. The apertures 204 are sized and shaped such that couplers (e.g., screws) can pass therethrough. The couplers secure the plate 116 to the robotic arm 102.
The EDA 108 is shown as comprising three RPDs 110-114. The present invention is not limited in this regard. Any number of RPDs, physical size(s) of RPDs, and/or energy sizes of RPDs can be employed herein without limitation. Also, any type of RPD and/or combination of various types of RPDs can be employed herein without limitation. For example, a first RPD may comprise a metal tube from which water is propelled, while a second RPD comprises a metal tube from which bullets are propelled.
The EDA 108 also comprises a moving carrier 118 for the RPDs 110-114. The moving carrier 118 is configured to facilitate the deployment of the RPDs 110-114 (as shown in
The EDA 108 further comprises a Recoil Absorption Mechanism (“RAM”) 120 for the RPDs 110-114. The RAM 120 includes at least one spring 122, 124. The springs 122, 124 are shown as comprising constant force springs. Constant force springs are well known in the art, and therefore will not be described in detail herein. Still, it should be understood that the force exerted by each spring 122, 124 over its range of motion is a constant. Thus, unlike conventional recoil absorption mechanisms, the RAM 120 does not need to be tuned to handle a particular type of impulse created from weapons firing since the force transmitted to the robotic arm is constant. This feature of the RAM 120 facilitates the use of varying sizes/energy RPDs as described above.
The spring 122, 124 is formed as a rolled ribbon of spring material (e.g., spring steel) such that it is relaxed when it is fully rolled up. As the spring 122, 124 is unrolled, the restoring force comes primarily from the portion of the ribbon near the roll. Because the geometry of that region remains nearly constant as the spring unrolls, the resulting force is nearly constant. The constant resulting force is an important feature of the springs 122, 124, which will become evident as the discussion progresses.
The springs 122, 124 can be arranged in various configurations relative to the RPDs 110-114. For example, as shown in
The particular arrangement of the springs 122, 124 is maintained by: coupling a first end (not visible in the figures) thereof to a reel 126; and coupling the reel 126 to the moving carrier 118. In this regard, the moving carrier 118 comprises upward extending flanges 302, 304 with apertures (not visible in the figures) formed therein. A rod 128 is disposed through the reel 126 and the aperture of the respective flange such that the reel 126 is rotatably coupled to the moving carrier 118. The rotatable coupling of the reel 126 to the moving carrier 118 allows the springs 122, 124 to be transitioned between their rolled positions shown in
The present invention is not limited to constant force springs. Additionally or alternatively, the springs may comprise coil springs or helical springs for storing energy due to resilience and subsequently release the stored energy to absorb an impulse force caused by firing the RPDs 110-114. Coil springs are made of an elastic material which returns to its material length when unloaded. The force that is applied to a coil spring is proportional to the displacement of the coil spring. As such, the coil springs can decelerate the RPDs 110-114 and the moving carrier from some initial high velocity immediately after weapon firing down to zero at the end of spring travel. The force transmitted to the robotic arm from the coil springs increases as the displacement of the coil spring increases. As such, the force is not a constant force as is the case with the constant force springs. Thus, for a given amount of energy that needs to be absorbed from weapon firing, the constant force spring provides the lowest peak force transmitted to the robotic arm as compared to that of the coil spring. Also, the overall collapsed size of the coil spring is larger than that of the constant force spring. The coil spring may be deformed as a result of overloading thereof. Such deformation does not occur with the constant force springs.
As shown in
Referring now to
For purposes of understanding the following discussion, the direction that the RPDs 626, 628 point or aim is shown by arrow 650. So if one or more of the RPDs 626, 628 is fired, an impulse force is applied thereby against the moving carrier 602 in an impulse direction 652 (i.e., a direction opposite to that shown by arrow 650). When such an impulse force is applied to the moving carrier 602, it slides in the impulse direction 652 along rails 606. The sliding movement of the moving carrier 602 is facilitated by bearings 608. The rails 606 and bearings 608 are formed of materials that have a relatively low coefficient of friction.
In the middle of the moving carrier 602, a Unidirectional Force Transfer (“UFT”) mechanism 610 is provided. The UFT mechanism 610 comprises an aperture formed in the moving carrier 602 and a plurality of flexible fins 630 disposed along a sidewall of the aperture. The fins 630 engage threads of a rod 614 such that the moving carrier 602 is freely movable in the impulse direction 652 and prevented from moving in the firing direction 650 when a pushing force is applied thereto in said firing direction 650.
Notably, the springs 612 are under tension at all times. In some scenarios, there is a 150 pound constant force pull from the springs 612. So when the RPDs 626, 628 are in their deployed positions shown in
As a consequence of firing the RPDs 626, 628, a force of the impulse is well above the combined pulling force of the springs 612. In some cases, the impulse force is a few thousand pounds of pull force in direction 652, while the spring force is a few hundred pounds in direction 650. Therefore, the impulse force causes (1) a passive breakaway of the fins 630 and (2) the moving carrier 602 to slide along rails 606 is the impulse direction 652 until the RPDs 626, 628 reach their retracted positions shown in
As the moving carrier 602 is sliding in the impulse direction 652, the energy from the RPD firing is being absorbed by the springs 612. Energy stored is defined mathematically as force times distance. As such, the stroke distance 700 is selected to ensure that all the energy from the RPD firing is stored in the springs 612. In some scenarios, the stroke distance 700 is selected to be about 10 inches.
The force that is transferred to the robotic arm (e.g., robotic arm 102 of
The RPDs 626, 628 may be maintained in their retracted position until another firing thereof is desirable. In the retracted position, the RPDs 626, 628 do not interfere with operations of a robotic arm (e.g., robotic arm 102 of
The present invention is not limited to the exemplary architecture shown in
Referring now to
As shown in
A schematic illustration showing the UFT mechanism 900 mechanically coupled to a moving carrier 1100 is provided in
In view of the forgoing, the present invention provides a mechanism for absorbing an impulsive load. The mechanism comprises: a fixed frame with a movable carrier (e.g., carrier 602 of
The robotic assembly of the present invention overcomes various drawbacks of conventional robotic assemblies, such as that disclosed in the background section of this document. For example, the length ratio between the stroke length of the recoil absorbing mechanism and the total length of the recoil absorbing mechanism is significantly improved in the present invention as compared to that of the conventional robotic assemblies. As such, the recoil absorbing mechanism of the present invention is much more compact as compared to conventional recoil absorbing mechanisms. Also, a constant recoil force is ensured in the present invention by the constant force springs. This is not the case in conventional designs. Furthermore, conventional designs do not enable active retraction/deployment of the RPDs, and/or use of varying size/energy RPDs in a single compact design.
Referring now to
All of the apparatus, methods and algorithms disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While the invention has been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations may be applied to the apparatus, methods and sequence of steps of the method without departing from the concept, spirit and scope of the invention. More specifically, it will be apparent that certain components may be added to, combined with, or substituted for the components described herein while the same or similar results would be achieved. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of the invention as defined.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
789806 | Haussner | May 1905 | A |
2790357 | Emil | Apr 1957 | A |
3004475 | Barr | Oct 1961 | A |
3604308 | Schulz | Sep 1971 | A |
3672255 | Findlay | Jun 1972 | A |
3783738 | Pelat | Jan 1974 | A |
3805608 | Schmidt | Apr 1974 | A |
4088057 | Nasypany | May 1978 | A |
4261247 | Reynolds | Apr 1981 | A |
4391180 | Koine | Jul 1983 | A |
4476969 | Dykema | Oct 1984 | A |
5014595 | Ducolon, Jr. | May 1991 | A |
5105715 | Nordmann | Apr 1992 | A |
5811720 | Quinnell | Sep 1998 | A |
6408731 | Elsener | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6578464 | Ebersole, Jr. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6789456 | DeRoos | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802406 | Martin | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6889594 | Ebersole, Jr. | May 2005 | B2 |
7228778 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7481146 | Weiss | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7878105 | More | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7997179 | Nelson | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8082836 | More | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8276501 | Sukurlu | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8281703 | Moore | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8297172 | Nelson | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8297174 | Russell | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8707846 | Kohnen | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8800735 | Ruthinowski | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8899141 | Reynolds | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9021728 | Kocmich, IV | May 2015 | B1 |
9134086 | Lim | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9435602 | Tomik | Sep 2016 | B1 |
20030041724 | Ebersole, Jr. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030200862 | Ebersole, Jr. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20060011056 | Edwards | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20080178508 | Cinciu | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20100109217 | Ruthinowski | May 2010 | A1 |
20110000363 | More | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110083550 | More | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110266105 | Yamamoto | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120001460 | Ruthinowski | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120210864 | More | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130033056 | Tunis, III | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20140230642 | Reynolds | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140291452 | Martinez | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160102945 | Itzkowitz | Apr 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 400 255 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2 406 519 | Jan 2012 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 15, 2015 for EP Application No. 15001697.0-1655. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160033239 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |