The present invention relates to logic circuits with reconfigurable functions, and more particularly, to a reconfigurable logic circuit using transistors (hereafter referred to as the “spin transistors”) that contain ferromagnetic bodies and have transfer characteristics depending on the magnetization states of the ferromagnetic bodies.
Recently, attention has been drawn to logic circuits that can reconfigure (or reprogram) functions in accordance with user programs. For example, a field programmable logic array (FPGA) that has been developed by the LSI technique is widely used (disclosed by S. Trimberger in Proc. IEEE 81 (1993) pp. 1030-1041, S. Hauck in Proc. IEEE 86 (1998) pp. 615-638, and Toshinori Sueyoshi in “Programmable Logic Devices” IEICE Tech. Report, Vol. 101, No. 632, (2002) pp. 17-24, for example). Conventionally, the FPGA has been used only for test products and limited products. However, since shipment can be made quickly and the functions can be rewritten after shipment, the FPGA is incorporated as the last component into mobile devices such as portable telephone devices that tend to be replaced with newly developed devices in a short time. Also, studies have been made on the FPGA as an information device of novel architecture that reconfigures its hardware for each operation.
There are several types of configurations for the FPGA. Among them, the Look Up Table (LUT) method using SRAMs is most widely used. In this configuration, small-sized logic blocks that are formed with LUTs for achieving desired functions are arranged in a matrix fashion, and the blocks are connected to one another with lines that can be changed by a switch (a pass transistor, for example) (see
A desired logic circuit is realized by rewriting the values to be written in the register of the LUT and the switch for the lines. Each logic block includes a flip-flop (FF) for operations in synchronization with the LUT (see
A SRAM is a volatile memory, and loses stored information when the power supply is cut off. Therefore, so as to maintain data, a non-volatile memory (a flash memory, for example) is prepared externally, and the information stored in the non-volatile memory is loaded every time the power supply is resumed.
Recently, studies have been made on a circuit that has a neuron MOS (hereinafter referred to as the “νMOS ”) in the logic circuit blocks. This circuit has been developed as a reconfigurable logic circuit based on principles entirely different from those of the FPGA according to the LUT method (disclosed by T. Shibata and T. Ohmi in IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. ED-39 (1992) pp. 1444-1455 and IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. ED-40 (1993) pp. 570-576, and by Hiroshi Sawada, Kazuo Aoyama, Akira Nagoya, and Kazuo Nakajima in “Consideration for a Reconfigurable Logic Device using Neuron MOS Transistors”, IEICE Tech. Report, Vol. 99, No. 481, (1999) pp. 41-48). Using νMOS, symmetric functions can be efficiently realized. Although the functions are limited compared with the functions according to the LUT method, attention is being drawn to this method, as a large number of symmetric functions appear in the stage of logic design.
Also, inputs are denoted by A and B, and the input of each control signal is denoted by Ck (k=0, 1, 2). The input to the main inverter 207 is controlled with Ck, thereby achieving a desired symmetric function. In the operation of this circuit, if Ck is “1”, the output is “0” only when the number of “1”s in the input is k. In other cases, the output is “1”. For example, if C0 and C2 are “1” and C1 is “0”, the output is “0” when the number of “1”s is 0 (A=B=“0”) and when the number of “1”s is 2 (A=B=“1”), but the output is “1” when the number of “1”s is 1 (A or B=“1”). Thus, a XOR logic circuit is obtained.
The above described logic blocks of the FPGA have the following problems. More specifically, the logic blocks that utilizes the LUT method and νMOS have problems in the volatility of logic functions. Also, problems are caused with respect to the number of devices (the occupied area).
First, the problems with the logic blocks according to the LUT method are described. In accordance with the LUT method, the circuit does not have capacity to rewrite to reconfigure logics, but refers to the values stored in the registers. SRAMs are employed for LUTs, the problems are caused by the volatility of the SRAMs. When the power supply is cut off, the contents of the LUTs, or the logic functions, are lost. In a case where the circuit is incorporated into a product, it is necessary to externally provide a non-volatile memory with an extremely large capacity for maintaining data. As a result, the area of the entire chip becomes larger, and the power consumption increases as a longer start-up time is required when power supply is resumed.
Also, in a case where a large number of devices (forty transistors are required in the circuit of
Next, the problems with the logic blocks using νMOS are described. In such logic blocks, the operation of the circuit can be rewritten with a control signal, unlike in the logic blocks according to the LUT method. For two inputs, the number of MOSFETs is 8, and the number of capacitors is 14, which are almost half of the number of devices required according to the LUT method. However, the area occupied by the capacitors for the νMOS structure is not small. Also, to maintain the functions of the circuit, a control signals needs to be constantly supplied during the use of the circuit. It is also necessary to prepare a control signal of a size different from the supply voltage and to employ a control circuit (a controller) for controlling the control signal. Since functions cannot be stored in a non-volatile manner, there is a problem in the maintenance of the non-volatility for logic functions, as with the LUT method.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a non-volatilely reconfigurable circuit with a small number of devices. Such a circuit should be small in size and have low power consumption.
In a circuit in accordance with the present invention, a transistor (hereinafter referred to as “spin transistor”) with transfer characteristics that depend on the spin direction of the conduction carriers or the magnetization states of the ferromagnetic bodies in the transistor is employed, and the input of the transistor is formed with a νMOS transistor. The operating point of the circuit is adjusted to rewrite functions by varying the driving force of the transistor through the control of the magnetization state of the spin transistor. This circuit is based on a novel technique of rewriting functions entirely in terns of hardware, as the characteristics of the device are changed. This circuit differs from a logic block only with a νMOS in that logic functions can be maintained in a non-volatile manner and a control signal is not required for switching logic functions. Furthermore, the functions of the circuit can be stored in a non-volatile manner, by virtue of the ferromagnetic bodies in the spin transistor. Using such a logic circuit of the present invention, the above described problems in FPGA can be eliminated.
The non-volatility is now described. The functions of a circuit are determined by the magnetization states of the ferromagnetic bodies included in the spin transistor. Accordingly, even when the power supply is cut off, the logic functions are maintained in a non-volatile manner, as the magnetization states do not change. In view of this, the portion corresponding to a logic block unit that is necessary in the conventional FPGA becomes unnecessary in an external non-volatile memory. This is advantageous in reducing the chip size. Furthermore, the time for loading logic functions is not required. Accordingly, the time required for start-up can also be shortened.
In a circuit in accordance with the present invention, the logic block includes nine to eleven MOSFETs and two capacitors. Accordingly, the number of devices decreases to a third of the number of device in the LUT structure or even less than that. Compared with a logic block using only a νMOS, the number of devices is halved. Since the external non-volatile memories are employed only for the line unit, the total number of devices is much smaller than that in a conventional circuit.
A spin transistor can be employed as a switch for selecting the line that connects logic blocks. Especially, a spin MOSFET that is described later is employed as the switch, so that the mutual lines between logic blocks can also be stored in a non-volatile manner. In such a case, a non-volatile memory becomes unnecessary for the line unit. The spin MOSFET as the switch may be a depletion MOSFET or an enhancement MOSFET. Further, a transfer gate that is formed with p-channel and n-channel spin MOSFETs can also be employed.
One aspect of the present invention can provide a circuit that includes a spin transistor having transfer characteristics depending on the spin direction of conduction carriers. In this circuit, the spin direction of the conduction carriers is changed so as to vary the transfer characteristics of the spin transistor, and an operating point is changed based on the transfer characteristics, thereby reconfiguring a function.
An A-D converter is connected to an output terminal of the circuit, so that the analog operating point at the output terminal is converted to a digital logic level. Also, the A-D converter includes a spin transistor, so that functions can be reconfigured by setting a threshold value depending on the magnetization state of the spin transistor.
Instead of the spin transistor, another spin transistor with variable transfer characteristics can be employed in the circuit. In such a case, the operating point is also moved by changing the transfer characteristics of the transistor, thereby reconfiguring functions. Here, the “variable transfer characteristics” are variable solid-state properties other than the biases such as Vds and Vgs, and the transfer characteristics of a transistor can be varied in a non-volatile manner. Accordingly, the output characteristics vary, even when biases are applied under the same conditions. Such a transistor can be realized with a ferromagnetic material or a ferroelectric material, or can be formed by a floating gate technique (by which carriers are injected to a floating gate so as to change a threshold value). The above described spin transistor is one of the transistors with variable transfer characteristics.
Referring to
As shown in
The circuit shown in
The circuit in accordance with the present invention contains ferromagnetic bodies made of a ferromagnetic metal or the like. This circuit is a non-volatile, reconfigurable circuit, and more particularly, is a logic circuit that employs a spin transistor that can control its transfer characteristics in accordance with the spin direction of the conduction carriers or the magnetization states of the ferromagnetic bodies. Using the spin transistor, a symmetric Boolean function can be realized with a small number of components.
In the following, the spin transistor is described in greater detail. The spin transistor has at least one ferromagnetic body (free layer) with a magnetization direction that can be independently controlled with a magnetic field or the like, and at least one ferromagnetic body (pin layer) with a fixed magnetization direction. In this spin transistor, the relative magnetization state between the free layer and the pin layer can be switched between parallel magnetization and antiparallel magnetization by changing the magnetization direction of the free layer.
In the spin transistor, output characteristics in accordance with the magnetization state inside can be realized by virtue of the conduction phenomena, such as spin-dependent scattering, a spin-dependent tunneling effect, and a spin filter effect, which depend on the spin direction of the carriers and the magnetization directions of the ferromagnetic bodies. Accordingly, the transfer characteristics of the spin transistor can be controlled in accordance with the relative magnetization direction of the pin layer with respect to the free layer contained in the spin transistor, even when the same biases are applied.
In the following, an example case where the spin transistor is a MOSFET spin transistor (hereinafter referred to as “spin MOSFET”) is described. Although spin-dependent conduction phenomena are included, the transistor operation is based on the same principles as those of the operation of a conventional MOSFET. Particularly, the output characteristics can be represented by gradual channel approximation.
The ferromagnetic source 3 serves as a spin injector that injects spin-polarized carriers to a channel formed below the gate in the semiconductor 1. The ferromagnetic drain 5 serves as a spin analyzer that detects an electric signal representing the direction of the spins injected to the channel. In a case where a ferromagnetic metal (FM) is employed as the ferromagnetic material, the ferromagnetic source 3 and the ferromagnetic drain 5 are formed with the Schottky junctions with the semiconductor (substrate) 1. A gate voltage is applied to the gate electrode 7, so that spin-polarized carriers can be injected from the ferromagnetic source 3 to the channel via a Schottky barrier.
The injected spin-polarized carriers reach the ferromagnetic drain 5 via the channel (for ease of explanation, the Rashba effect caused by the gate field of the spin-polarized carriers injected to the channel is ignored). In a case where parallel magnetization is observed between the source and the drain, the spin-polarized carriers injected to the ferromagnetic drain 5 become a drain current, without adverse influence of spin-dependent scattering. In a case where antiparallel magnetization is observed, on the other hand, the ferromagnetic drain 5 is subjected to the resistance due to spin-dependent scattering. Accordingly, in the spin MOSFET, the current drive force varies depending on the relative magnetization direction between the source and the drain.
Next, a νMOS structure is described in conjunction with
In the 2-input νMOS structure shown in
An AND/OR reconfigurable logic circuit can be realized using the inputs of the νMOS structure and an inverter structure having an E/E configuration, an E/D configuration, or a CMOS configuration formed with spin MOSFETS and conventional MOSFETS as the circuit structure of the circuit group P and the circuit group Q.
As shown in
Next, a reconfigurable logic circuit in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention is described in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. In the logic circuit in accordance with this embodiment, the driver or the active load of an E/D inverter circuit formed with an enhancement MOSFET and a depletion MOSFET is replaced with a spin MOSFET. To replace the driver, an enhancement spin MOSFET should be employed. To replace the active load, a depletion spin MOSFET should be employed. The input νMOS structure is used for the driver. As for the inverter of the output stage, a CMOS inverter is most preferred in terms of performance, but it is possible to employ an inverter of another type, such as an E/D inverter.
The load curve in the E/E configuration varies according to the voltage generated in the driver. With the E/D configuration, on the other hand, the load curve with the active load is saturated. Accordingly, a wider logic margin can be allowed.
1) AND/OR Circuit
Referring now to
In a case where the circuit functions as an OR circuit, the spin MOSFET is put into the antiparalell magnetization configuration, and the parameter βn1 is set at 1, with which the current driving capacity is small. Here, in the case of A=B=“0”, the operating point Vm is V0 according to
In a case where the circuit functions as an AND circuit, the spin MOSFET is put into the paralell magnetization configuration, and the parameter βn1 is set at 10, with which the current driving capacity is large. Here, in the case of A=B=“0”, the operating point Vm is V0, and accordingly, the output Vout is “0”. In the case of A or B=“1”, the operating point Vm is VR, and accordingly, the output Vout is “0”. In the case of A=B=“1”, the operating point Vm is VS, and accordingly, the output Vout is “1”.
2) AND/OR/XNOR Circuit
Referring first to
Next, the XNOR function is described in conjunction with
3) AND/OR/XNOR/NAND/NOR/XOR Functions
In a circuit shown in
Next, a reconfigurable logic circuit in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention is described in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. A logic circuit in accordance with this embodiment can be formed by using a spin MOSFET for either the n-channel MOSFET or the p-channel MOSFET in a CMOS inverter, or using spin MOSFETs for both the n-channel MOSFET and the p-channel MOSFET. The νMOS structure used for the input is formed with a floating gate shared by the n-channel device and the p-channel device. The inverter of the output stage is a conventional inverter of the CMOS configuration.
In accordance with this embodiment, the operating curve is saturated as in the E/D configuration, and accordingly, the mean logic margin can be made wider. Also, it is effective for low power consumption.
1) Threshold Value Variable Inverter
The inverter circuit shown in
Here, the logic threshold value Vinv is plotted as the function of the driving force ratio βinv=βninv/βpinv in
2) AND/OR
2-1) OR
Referring now to
2-2) AND
Referring now to
As can be seen from
2-3) OR
When the transistor Tr1 is put into an antiparalell magnetization configuration (βp1=1) and the transistor Tr2 is put into a paralell magnetization configuration (βn2=10) in a circuit illustrated in
2-4) AND
When the transistor Tr1 is put into a paralell magnetization configuration (βp1=10) and the transistor Tr2 is put into an antiparalell magnetization configuration (βn2=1) in the circuit illustrated in
3) AND/OR/XNOR
The details of the operation are shown in Table 5.
3-1) AND/OR (See
As the transistor Tr5 is put into an antiparalell magnetization configuration (βn5=0.5), the current Id
3-2) XNOR (See
The transistor Tr5 is put into a paralell magnetization configuration (βn5=50). In the inverter part, the transistor Tr1 is put into a paralell magnetization configuration (βp1=10), and the transistor Tr2 is put into an antiparalell magnetization configuration (βn2=1), as in the AND circuit. In the case where A=B=“1” or A or B=“1”, the transistor Tr5 is equivalent to an open circuit, and operates in the same manner as the AND circuit. In the case where A=B=“0”, Vm is discharged by the current Id
Although all symmetric Boolean functions can be realized by adding an inverter to the output of the circuit shown in
4) AND/OR/XNOR/XOR
The variation in the current driving capacity βp8 of the transistor Tr8 between parallel magnetization and antiparallel magnetization is wider than that in the case of the transistors Tr1 and Tr2, and βp8 is 0.5 (antiparallel magnetization) or 50 (parallel magnetization). In the case of parallel magnetization (β8p=50), a sufficiently high current (Id
The operation of this circuit is shown in Table 6.
4-1) AND/OR/XNOR
When the transistor Tr8 is put into an antiparalell magnetization configuration (βp8=0.5) in the circuit shown in
4-2) XOR (See
The transistor Tr8 is put into a paralell magnetization configuration (βp8=50). In the other parts, the transistor Tr1 is put into an antiparalell magnetization configuration (βp1=1), the transistor Tr2 is put into a paralell magnetization configuration (βn2=10), and the transistor Tr5 is put into an antiparalell magnetization configuration (βn5=0.5), as in the OR circuit. In the case where A=B=“0” or A or B=“1”, the transistor Tr8 is open, and operates in the same manner as the OR circuit. In the case where A=B=“1”, Vm is charged with the current Id
5) AND/OR/XNOR/XOR/NAND/NOR
As in the case shown in
5-1) AND/OR
When the transistor Tr5 is put into an antiparalell magnetization configuration (βn5=0.5) and the transistor Tr8 is put into an antiparalell magnetization configuration (βp8=0.5), the transistors Tr5 and Tr8 are both open. Accordingly, this circuit is equivalent to the circuit shown in
5-2) XNOR
When the transistor Tr5 is put into a paralell magnetization configuration (βn5=50) and the transistor Tr8 is put into an antiparalell magnetization configuration (βp8=0.5), the transistor Tr8 is open. Accordingly, this circuit is equivalent to the circuit shown in
5-3) XOR
When the transistor Tr5 is put into an antiparalell magnetization configuration (βn5=0.5) and the transistor Tr8 is put into a paralell magnetization configuration (βp8=50), the circuit becomes an XOR equivalent to the circuit shown in
5-4) NAND (See
The transistor Tr1 is put into an antiparalell magnetization configuration (βp1=1), the transistor Tr2 is put into a paralell magnetization configuration (βn2=10), the transistor Tr5 is put into a paralell magnetization configuration (βn5=50), and the transistor Tr8 is put into a paralell magnetization configuration (βp8=50). In the case where A=B=“0”, discharging is performed by the transistor Tr5, and the operating point Vm becomes VT<Vinv2. Accordingly, the output Vout becomes “1”. In the case where A or B is “1”, the operating point Vm becomes VP<Vinv2, and accordingly, the output Vout becomes “1”. In the case where A=B=“1”, Vm is charged by the transistor Tr8, so as to be Vm=VU>Vinv2. Accordingly, Vout becomes “0”.
5-5) NOR (See
The transistor Tr1 is put into a paralell magnetization configuration (βp1=10), the transistor Tr2 is put into an antiparalell magnetization configuration (βn2=1), the transistor Tr5 is put into a paralell magnetization configuration (βn5=50), and the transistor Tr8 is put into a paralell magnetization configuration (βp8=50). In the case where A=B=“0”, charging is performed by the transistor Tr5, and the operating point Vm becomes VS<Vinv2. Accordingly, the output Vout becomes “1”. In the case where A or B is “1”, the operating point Vm becomes VR>Vinv2, and accordingly, the output Vout becomes “0”. In the case where A=B=“1”, Vm is charged by the transistor Tr8, so as to be Vm=VV>Vinv2. Accordingly, Vout becomes “0”.
In the circuit shown in
Next, a logic circuit of a second CMOS configuration is described for reference, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. In this logic circuit, a threshold value variable inverter is employed as the output-stage inverter, so as to form a rewritable logic circuit. A logic threshold value Vinv is a binary value (Vinv
1) NAND/NOR
In the case where A=B=“0”, the operating point Vm is VO<Vinv
2) NAND/NOR/XOR
2-1) NAND/NOR (See
In the circuit shown in
2-2) XNOR (See
In
Further, when the transistor Tr5 is put into the state in which βn5 is 10 and the threshold value is set at Vinv
3) NAND/NOR/XNOR/XOR
The details of the operation are shown in Table 10.
3-1) NAND/NOR/XNOR
The transistor Tr8 is put into a non-driving force state (βp8=1), so that the current flowing through the transistor Tr8 can be ignored. Accordingly, this part can be regarded as open, and the circuit becomes equivalent to the circuit shown in
3-2) XOR
The transistor Tr8 is put into the state in which βp8 is 10, and the threshold value of the inverter is set at Vinv
4) NAND/NOR/XNOR/XOR/OR/AND
In the circuit shown in
Taking this fact into consideration, an OR/AND can be realized with the circuit shown in
The details of the operation are shown in Table 11.
4-1) NAND/NOR (See
With βn5 being 1 and βp8 being 1, the transistors Tr5 and Tr8 are both open. Accordingly, this circuit is equivalent to the circuit shown in
4-2) XNOR
With βn5 being 10 and βp8 being 1, the transistor Tr8 is open with Vinv
4-3) XOR
With βn5 being 1 and βp8 being 10, this circuit is equivalent to the circuit shown in
4-4) AND/OR
The value βn5 is set at 10, and the value βp8 is set at 10 in the circuit shown in
The above circuit may be of either an n-channel type or a p-channel type, as long as the transistors Tr1 and Tr2 are of the same conductivity type in each circuit diagram.
In the following, a logic circuit in accordance with the above examples of reconfigurable circuits using spin MOSFETs is described in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. This logic circuit employs circuit groups including enhancement MOSFETs and n-channel spin MOSFETs.
1) NAND/NOR Circuit
Tr2 is a spin MOSFET (distinguished from a conventional MOSFET by the addition of an arrow), and a constant bias Vb is applied to Tr2. The driving force can be either βn2=1 or βn2=10, depending on the magnetization state stored in the spin MOSFET (Tr2).
The static characteristics of the spin MOSFET (Tr2) are shown by the solid line in
The analog voltage Vm supplied at the operating points (VO through VS) is inverted and amplified to the digital logic level “0” or “1” by an inverter with the characteristics shown in the lower half of
Table 12 shows the relationship among βn2, the operating points, and the circuit functions.
The driving force of the spin MOSFET (Tr2) in a paralell magnetization configuration is βn2=10. In the case where A=B=“0”, the drain current Id is 0. The analog voltage Vm is VO<Vinv, and the output Vout is “1”, with the inverting amplification of the A-D converter being taken into consideration. In the case where A=B=“1”, the drain current Id is expressed as Id=βn1(Vdd−Vm−Vth)2/2. Here, Vm is VP>Vinv, and Vout is “0”. The above outputs do not depend on the driving force βn2 of the spin MOSFET (Tr2) (not depending on whether the magnetization state is parallel or antiparallel). In the case where A or B is “1”, the drain current Id is expressed as Id=βn1 (Vdd/2−Vm−Vth)2. Here, one of the inputs is “1”, and Vm is discharged by Tr2. As a result, Vm becomes VR<Vinv, and Vout is “1”. Thus, the circuit functions as a NAND circuit.
The driving force of the spin MOSFET (Tr2) in an antiparalell magnetization configuration is βn2=1. In the case where A=B=“0”, the analog voltage Vm is VO<Vinv, and the output Vout is “1”, with the inverting amplification of the A-D converter being taken into consideration. In the case where A=B=“1”, Vm is VQ>Vinv, and Vout is “0”. The above outputs do not depend on the driving force βn2 of the spin MOSFET (Tr2) (not depending on whether the magnetization state is parallel or antiparallel). In the case where A or B is “1”, Vm is charged by Tr1. As a result, Vm becomes VS>Vinv, and Vout is “0”. Thus, the circuit functions as a NOR circuit.
As shown in Table 12, based on whether the driving force βn2, which can vary according to the magnetization state in the spin MOSFET, is 1 or 10, a NOR logic or a NAND logic can be selected as the output Vout in response to the inputs A and B. Since the magnetization state of the spin MOSFET is stored in a non-volatile manner, a NOR logic or a NAND logic can be selected in a single circuit. If a circuit having such a function is formed with a conventional CMOS digital circuit, ten MOSFETs are necessary. The circuit of this example is advantageous in that the same function can be realized with only four MOSFETs.
2) NAND/NOR+XNOR
Referring now to
The source followers of Tr3 and Tr4 form a negative level shifter, and Tr5 is turned on only in the case where A=B=“1”. In
3) NAND/NOR/XNOR+AND/OR/XOR Functions
Another stage of inverter is added to the output terminal Vout shown in
As described so far, any of the logic circuits in accordance with the embodiments of the present invention includes a spin transistor or a spin MOSFET that can change the current driving force in a non-volatile manner, and a νMOS structure. In such a structure, symmetric Boolean functions that are reconfigurable in a non-volatile manner can be realized with a small number of devices. With this circuit, the chip area can be reduced, and high-speed, low-consumption electric operations can be expected. Accordingly, this circuit can be applied to the integrated circuits for mobile devices that are produced in a short time.
Although the logic circuits in accordance with the specific examples and embodiments of the present invention have been described so far, the present invention is not limited to them. It should be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made to the above examples and embodiments, and various combinations of them can also be made.
Using a logic circuit of the present invention, symmetric Boolean functions that are reconfigurable in a non-volatile manner can be realized with a smaller number of devices. Since a circuit of the present invention can maintain each logic function in a non-volatile manner, there is no need to employ a non-volatile memory for storing logic functions. Accordingly, the chip size can be reduced. Also, using a circuit with a smaller number of devices, high-speed, low-consumption electric operations can be expected. Thus, the circuits of the present invention can be applied to the integrated circuits for mobile devices that are produced in a short time.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2003-086499 | Mar 2003 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2004/004379 | 3/26/2004 | WO | 00 | 12/7/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/086625 | 10/7/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5652445 | Johnson | Jul 1997 | A |
5654566 | Johnson | Aug 1997 | A |
5661421 | Ohmi et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5998842 | Sano | Dec 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 685 808 | Dec 1995 | EP |
A-05-343984 | Dec 1983 | JP |
A-61-234623 | Oct 1986 | JP |
A-06-250994 | Sep 1994 | JP |
A-09-097906 | Apr 1997 | JP |
A-11-340542 | Dec 1999 | JP |
A-2000-349619 | Dec 2000 | JP |
A-2002-246487 | Aug 2002 | JP |
A-2003-008105 | Jan 2003 | JP |
A-2003-060211 | Feb 2003 | JP |
A-2003-092412 | Mar 2003 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060114018 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |