The subject matter described herein relates to surgical tables and particularly to a surgical table which provides a surgeon and other members of the surgical staff with improved access to a patient's surgical site.
A typical surgical table includes head end and foot end support units and a support top which spans between and is supported by the support units. The typical arrangement of the support top relative to the support units may be satisfactory for many surgeries. For other surgeries the typical arrangement may be suboptimal because it does not always afford the surgeon optimal access to the patient's surgical site. This application describes a reconfigurable surgical table that improves the surgeon's access to the surgical site.
One embodiment of a patient support device comprises an alternate support top, a head support unit partially supporting the alternate support top, a foot support unit longitudinally spaced from the head support unit, and an adaptor associated with the foot support unit. The adaptor is securable to the foot support unit so that the adaptor and foot support unit cooperate to partially support the alternate support top so that the alternate support top extends footwardly beyond the foot support unit.
Another embodiment of the patient support device comprises a head support unit, a foot support unit, a connecting member extending longitudinally between the head support unit and the foot support unit and connecting the units together, and a crown attachable to and detachable from the foot support unit.
An embodiment of a patient support system comprises a first or baseline set of support tops having at least one member, a head support unit, and a foot support unit longitudinally spaced from the head support unit. The head support unit and the foot support unit have a baseline configuration such that each member of the first set of support tops is supportable partially by the head support unit and partially by the foot support unit. The patient support system also includes a second or alternate set of support tops having at least one member. The members of the second set of support tops are unsupportable by the baseline configured head support unit and foot support unit, however the head support unit, the foot support unit or both are reconfigurable to a non-baseline configuration so that each member of the second set is supportable partially by the head support unit and partially by the foot support unit.
The foregoing and other features of the various embodiments of the patient support device and patient support system described herein will become more apparent from the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings in which:
Reference will now be made to embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Features similar to or the same as features already described may be identified by the same reference numerals already used. The terms “substantially” and “about” may be used herein to represent the inherent degree of uncertainty that may be attributed to any quantitative comparison, value, measurement or other representation. These terms are also used herein to represent the degree by which a quantitative representation may vary from a stated reference without resulting in a change in the basic function of the subject matter at issue.
Referring to
A connecting member 30 extends longitudinally between the head support unit and the foot support unit and connects the support units to each other. The connecting member may be a fixed length member or may be an adjustable length member constructed of, for example, telescoping tubes.
Head unit 22 comprises a base 40, casters 42 extending from the bottom of the base, and a column 44 extending vertically upwardly from the base. The column comprises a primary elevator 50 which is height adjustable relative to base 40, for example by a hydraulic system. The column also includes a secondary elevator 52 attached to the primary elevator. The height of the secondary elevator relative to primary elevator is fixed, however the secondary elevator includes two or more attachment stations 54 to which a first end 101A of a baseline patient support top 100A can be attached. The baseline support top 100A is a member of a set of baseline support tops indicated generally by reference numeral 100. The attachment stations are indicated schematically by triangular symbols and are vertically separated from each other.
Foot unit 24 comprises a base 60, casters 62 extending from the bottom of the base, and a column 64 extending vertically upwardly from the base. The column comprises a primary elevator 70 which includes a pedestal portion 80 and a crown 82. The crown is attachable to and detachable from the pedestal. The primary elevator is height adjustable relative to base 60, for example by a hydraulic system. The column also includes a secondary elevator 72 attached to the primary elevator, specifically to crown 82. The height of the secondary elevator relative to primary elevator is fixed, however the secondary elevator includes two or more attachment stations 74 to which a second end 102A of patient support top 100A can be attached. The attachment stations are indicated schematically by triangle symbols and are vertically separated from each other. Crown 82 is attachable to and detachable from pedestal 80.
The first end 101A of the support top is attached to the head secondary elevator 52 at a selected attachment station 54, and the second end 102A of the support top is attached to the foot secondary elevator 72 at a selected attachment station 74. “First” and “second” are used herein to conveniently distinguish between longitudinally opposite ends of the support top but do not necessarily correspond to the orientation of the patient. The secondary elevators 52, 72 are the interfaces between the longitudinal ends 101A, 102A of the support top 100A and the support units 22, 24. The load borne by the secondary elevators is transferred to the floor by way of the primary elevators 50, 70, bases 40, 60 and casters 42, 62. In practice, a staff member chooses attachment stations and heights of the height adjustable primary elevators to position the patient at a desired height and inclination (e.g. level, inclined head down, inclined foot down).
Various accessories may be attached to the baseline support top as well as to the members of set of alternate support tops which are described more completely below and are illustrated in
At least the foot support unit, and therefore the patient support device as a whole, is configurable in a baseline configuration. The baseline configuration includes a baseline support top 100A and crown 82 as seen in
When a baseline support top is used, the head support unit and the foot support unit each partially support the baseline support top and, taken collectively, support all the weight of the support top. As used herein, unless specified otherwise, the weight of the baseline support top includes the weight of the support top itself and any weight borne by the support top (e.g. the weight of any accessories and of the patient).
The baseline arrangement of the support top relative to the support units may be satisfactory for many surgeries but may be suboptimal for others. If the surgeon stands to the right of the foot support unit as seen in
When an alternate support top is used, the head support unit and the foot support unit each partially support the alternate support top and, taken collectively, support all the weight of the support top. As used herein, unless specified otherwise, the weight of the alternate support top includes the weight of the support top itself and any weight borne by the support top (e.g. the weight of any accessories and of the patient).
In the non-baseline configuration the adaptor and foot support unit cooperate to partially support the alternate support top so that the alternate support top extends footwardly beyond the foot support unit. This specification uses the term “overextend” and variants thereof to refer to extension of a support top footwardly beyond the foot support unit or headwardly beyond the head unit. In particular the alternate support top extends footwardly beyond the foot support unit by a prescribed distance DP. The prescribed distance may be defined by a surgical access requirement. One example of a surgical access requirement may be seen by comparing
Alternatively or additionally the prescribed distance may be expressed in terms of anthropometric parameters. For example the prescribed distance may be 50% of the height of a 99th percentile mail so that up to 50% of a 99th percentile male patient (and a larger percentage of a smaller patient) can be positioned footwardly beyond the footwardmost edge 128 of the foot support unit. One source of anthropometric data is “The Measure of Man and Woman—Human Factors in Design” by Alvin R. Tilley, ISBN 0-471-09955-4.
The bottom side of the adaptor includes a connector 160. The pedestal includes a mating connector 162. The connectors convey a service to the alternate support top or to accessories attached to the alternate support top. Example services include electrical energy 170, electrical grounding 172, data 174, hydraulics 176 and pneumatics 178 (e.g. hydraulic fluid or air to power accessories).
As already noted, use of “head” and “foot” is used herein to distinguish between distinct support units. In the examples of
The system also includes a second or alternate set 200 of support tops comprising m members 1 through m, and identified individually by 200A, 200B, and so forth. The second set of support tops has at least one member and may have two or more members. The members of the second set of support tops are unsupportable by the combination of the baseline configured head support unit and the baseline configured foot support unit. In other words although the baseline configured head support unit may be able to partially support one end of a member of the second set, the baseline configured head support unit and the baseline configured foot support unit, acting together, cannot provide complete and satisfactory support for any of the members of the second set of support tops. This incompatibility is signified by the interrupted arrows extending from the members of the second set toward the baseline configured support units at the center left of the illustration.
As seen at the center right of the illustration the foot support unit is reconfigurable to a non-baseline configuration so that each member of the second set of support tops is supportable partially by the head support unit and partially by the foot support unit. This compatibility is signified by the arrows leading from the members of the second set to the space between the non-baseline configured support units. At least one member of the second set, when supported by a non-baseline configured foot support unit, extends footwardly beyond the foot support unit by a prescribed distance DP. The members of the first set of support tops are unsupportable by the head support unit and the non-baseline configured foot support unit. This incompatibility is signified by the interrupted arrows extending from the members of the first set toward the support units at the center right of the illustration.
The patient support system also includes a group 90 of adaptors comprising p members 1 through p, and identified individually by 90A, 90B, and so forth. The adaptor set 90 has at least one member and may have two or more members. The adaptor or adaptors of the adaptor set are used in the way already described to effect the reconfiguration of the foot support unit to the non-baseline configuration. The illustrated adaptor set includes at least a first adaptor 90A useable to effect reconfiguration of a specified one of the two support units (either the head support unit 22 or the foot support unit 24) to the non-baseline configuration in order to accommodate connection of a member of the second set of support tops. The illustrated adaptor set may also include a second adaptor (e.g. 90B) useable to effect reconfiguration of the specified one of the two support units to the non-baseline configuration for a different member of the second set of support tops.
Continuing to refer to
In view of the foregoing certain details of the patient support device can now be better appreciated. Referring to
Referring to
As is evident from the foregoing description, the adaptor is removable from its host support unit thereby rendering the foot support unit reconfigurable to a baseline configuration in which a baseline support top is supportable by the support unit. The support unit is considered to be reconfigurable to a baseline configuration in the sense that crown 82 can be installed on pedestal 80 subsequent to removal of adaptor 90A in order to achieve the baseline configuration. In another embodiment the crown is not required to achieve the baseline configuration because pedestal 80, standing alone without the crown, is capable of providing the needed support for the baseline support top. In that case the removal of the adaptor converts the support unit to the baseline configuration rather than putting it in a condition for being reconfigured to the baseline configuration (by attaching a crown).
Crown 82 and the members of the adaptor set 90 have been described as slidably removable from pedastal 80 by being slid toward the opposite support unit. However other directions of removal such as being slid away from the other support unit, being removed laterally, and being removed vertically may also be satisfactory.
Although this disclosure refers to specific embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the subject matter set forth in the accompanying claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5088706 | Jackson | Feb 1992 | A |
5131106 | Jackson | Jul 1992 | A |
5279011 | Schnelle | Jan 1994 | A |
6262220 | Lamb et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
7152261 | Jackson | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7739762 | Lamb et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8826474 | Jackson | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9095489 | Berry et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20040133983 | Newkirk et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060096033 | Wong et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20090282614 | Jackson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20140359941 | Sharps | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150202106 | Hight et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150265482 | Ciblak et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20170040664 | Tockweiler | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20190209409 | Jackson | Jul 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
204684067 | Oct 2015 | CN |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for JP Application 2017-241668; dated Feb. 26, 2019. |
Response to JP Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2019 for JP Application 2017-241668. |
European Search Report for E P Application 17208254.7; dated May 22, 2018; Place of search—The Hague; Date of completion of the search—May 11, 2018; Examiner—Gkama, Alexandra. |
Decision of Rejection for JP Application No. 2017-241668; dated Jan. 7, 2020. |
Response to European Search Report for EP Application 17208254.7 dated Jan. 9, 2019. |
Amended Pages (Tracked) to Response to European Search Report for EP Application 17208254.7. |
Amended Pages (Final) to Response to European Search Report for EP Application 17208254.7. |
Claims (Tracked) to Response to European Search Report for EP Application 17208254.7. |
Claims (Final) to Response to European Search Report for EP Application 17208254.7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180185228 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62442598 | Jan 2017 | US |