This invention relates to a reconfigurable single instruction multiple data (SIMD) array.
Reconfigurable arithmetic logic unit (ALU) arrays often use ALUs, registers, and memory interconnected by crossbar switches in order to allow reconfiguring for different applications. This approach requires a substantial amount of bus wiring. Another problem with these arrays is that it requires significant time to reconfigure all of the crossbar switches when changing from one hardware configuration to another. One of the most demanding processing tasks is that involving Viterbi decoding algorithm, an efficient implementation of a maximum likelihood sequence estimator using convolutional codes. In viterbi decoders, convolutionally coded symbols that are received possibly corrupted by noise, are compared with all possible expected symbols, using a specific metric (Hamming distance or Euclidean distance). The possible symbols expected depend upon the data to be decoded and the initial state of the convolutional encoder. The Viterbi decoder attempts to find the most probable set of “states” and the most probable possible input to the encoder. If K is the Viterbi decoder constraint length, then the Viterbi decoder algorithm has 2k−1 states for each symbol. Two or more paths emanate from each state at time n to two or more states at time n+1. For each of those paths, a value has to be added to a metric accumulator. The value is a function of the received symbol and the expected symbol along the path. At each state at time n+1, two or more paths merge. The Viterbi decoder algorithm has to select the one with the higher metric, and it has to record this decision. The Viterbi decoder has to make such a decision for each received symbol for each of the 2k−1 states. Often the implementation for these applications is dedicated hardware, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs). These are not only expensive and area consuming, they are also able to process only one specific convolutional code. If the hardware is designed for a code with a two parallel transition per state algorithm it can not implement a cell with four parallel transitions (also sometimes referred to hereinafter as “branches”) per state. If it is designed for a two branch thirty-two state, it cannot operate on a two branch sixty-four state. And so any versatility comes at the cost of additional ASICs for each different Viterbi algorithm. This approach also requires significant bus wiring. For example, a two branch, sixty-four state Viterbi will need sixty-four processing cells and 64×2 buses with each bus being 8, 16, 32, . . . . lines. Thus, for a thirty-two line implementation there is required a bus line capacity of 2×32×64 or 64 time the number of cells. If a four branch Viterbi is implemented the number of lines needed is 4×32×64 or a hundred and twenty eight times the number of cells. If a two branch one hundred and twenty-eight state Viterbi were to be implemented not only the number of bus lines would be increased, but the number of cells, too, would have to be increased to one hundred and twenty-eight. This increases the power consumption as well. See the Elixent reconfigurable ALU array (RAA) at www.elixent.com. See also the XPP architecture at www.PACTCORP.com.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a reconfigurable single instruction multiple data (SIMD) array.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a reconfigurable single instruction multiple data (SIMD) array which is quickly and easily reconfigurable.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a reconfigurable single instruction multiple data (SIMD) array which is reconfigurable in software.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a reconfigurable single instruction multiple data (SIMD) array which is lower in cost, requires less die area, and is faster in processing operations.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a reconfigurable single instruction multiple data (SIMD) array which is quickly and easily reconfigurable to perform many different applications including different Viterbi algorithms.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a reconfigurable single instruction multiple data (SIMD) array which uses a minimum of bus wiring.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a reconfigurable single instruction multiple data (SIMD) array which requires only one line per cell regardless of the application, e.g., two branch or four branch Viterbi.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a reconfigurable single instruction multiple data (SIMD) array which consumes less power.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a reconfigurable single instruction multiple data (SIMD) array which can increase processing capacity by not having a relationship between the number of states and the number of cells, where each cell can process one, two or more states by sharing the same serial transmitter circuit or by having a separate serial transmitter for each state.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a reconfigurable single instruction multiple data (SIMD) array which provides a bus with fixed connection points regardless of reconfiguration.
The invention results from the realization that an improved single instruction multiple data (SIMD) array which is quickly and easily reconfigurable in software rather than actually reconfigurable in hardware and which is smaller, less costly and faster, can be effected by providing for each processing cell an identification number uniquely identifying each cell and its dedicated line in a serial data bus and a communications port having a transmitter circuit which broadcasts its cell's output data over its dedicated line, at least one receiver circuit, and a configuration register associated with each receiver circuit and responsive to the identification number and a common command word to condition its receiver circuit to receive serial input data broadcast from any other cell on that cell's dedicated line.
This invention features a reconfigurable single instruction multiple data array including a plurality of processing cells and a serial data bus with a line dedicated to each cell. Each cell includes an identification number for uniquely identifying each cell and its dedicated line and a communication port including at least one parallel to serial transmitter circuit in each cell for broadcasting its cell's output data over its dedicated line and at least one serial to parallel receiver circuit in each cell. Each cell is responsive to the identification number and a common command word to generate a local configuration command designating a pre-selected broadcasting cell. A configuration register is associated with each receiver circuit and is responsive to the local configuration command to condition its receiver circuit to receive serial input data broadcast from the pre-selected cell's dedicated line.
In a preferred embodiment, each processing cell may include an arithmetic logic unit and a memory. The identification number identifies both a cell and its dedicated line. The identification number may be different from the location of the dedicated line in the parallel line serial bus as long as the two are linearly related. The parallel to serial transmitter circuit may include a shift register. The serial to parallel receiver circuit may include a shift register. The arithmetic logic unit may include an arithmetic logic circuit, an adder and a shifter.
Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:
There is shown in
Each cell, as exemplified by cell 12a,
Each cell is operated by a common command word 60,
In operation, common command word 60 contains an instruction in field 66 that instructs the arithmetic logic unit 16 to perform a particular function on the unique identification number stored in identification register 32 in conjunction with data that is carried in the data field 62 of the same common command word. Thus, for example, in a simplified illustration the instruction can cause the ALU 16 in each cell 12 to increase its identification number by one or two or some number carried in the data field; that number is then installed in configuration register 52 for example and causes the serial port receiver 44 to look for the dedicated line in the sixty-three input lines 35 which is identified in configuration register 52. Each configuration register as indicated with respect to configuration register 52,
An example with respect to this specific application, namely a Viterbi algorithm, is illustrative. The Viterbi trellis 80,
Thus the reconfigurability afforded by this invention is not just easily and quickly implementable, but is also extremely versatile. For example, it could easily accommodate switching between the two branch, sixteen state Viterbi trellis 80 in FIG. 7 and the four branch sixteen state Viterbi trellis 90 shown in
Although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention. The words “including”, “comprising”, “having”, and “with” as used herein are to be interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible embodiments.
Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims:
This application claims priority based on U.S. Provisional application Ser. No. 60/350,398 entitled SINGLE INSTRUCTION MULTIPLE DATA (SIMD) ALU ARRAY to Kablotsky et al., filed Jan. 21, 2002 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/090,941 entitled SINGLE INSTRUCTION MULTIPLE DATA ARRAY CELL to Stein et al., filed Mar. 5, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3303477 | Voigt | Feb 1967 | A |
3805037 | Ellison | Apr 1974 | A |
4722050 | Lee et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4847801 | Tong | Jul 1989 | A |
4852098 | Brechard et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4918638 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5095525 | Almgren et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5182746 | Hurlbut et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5214763 | Blaner et al. | May 1993 | A |
5379243 | Greenberger et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386523 | Crook et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5446850 | Jeremiah et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5577262 | Pechanek et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5689452 | Cameron | Nov 1997 | A |
5832290 | Gostin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5996057 | Scales, III et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6049815 | Lambert et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6199086 | Dworkin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199087 | Blake et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223320 | Dubey et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230179 | Dworkin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246768 | Kim | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6317819 | Morton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6349318 | Vanstone et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6434662 | Greene et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6587864 | Stein et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
20020041685 | McLoone et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020147825 | Stein et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030103626 | Stein et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105791 | Stein et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110196 | Stein et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115234 | Stein et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030133568 | Stein et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140212 | Stein et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140213 | Stein et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149857 | Stein et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 246 389 | Oct 2002 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030140211 A1 | Jul 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60350398 | Jan 2002 | US |