The present invention is directed to transaction processing and, more specifically, to the processing and management of recurring transactions involving goods and/or services.
Transaction processing has typically involved intensive manual effort and, in instances where automatic processing has been used, intensive user intervention. For example, many transaction processes involve the use of a variety of different types of transaction documents such as orders, invoices, receipts and bills of lading (BOL). These types of transaction documents include information associated with the transaction and used by parties to the transaction to monitor and process the transaction. Many of these and other types of transactions occur on a cyclic or other recurring basis, with elements to the transaction that repeat. While repetitive in nature, certain elements of transactions, such as delivery confirmation and payment, are typically addressed on an individual transaction cycle or period basis.
Cyclic and other recurring transaction documents are electronically processed for a multitude of different types of applications. Interaction data (e.g., electronic or physical documents) describing characteristics of a particular transaction is often encountered in varied temporal order at transaction locations that assemble these documents into logical packages for automated processing. For example, there are often multiple parties to the transaction in addition to the common buyer and seller, such as shippers, financial institutions, distributors and regulatory agencies (e.g., customs, taxation agencies). Each of these parties often provides one or more different types of documents that relate to the transaction, and provides these documents at different times. For instance, an invoice may be sent for a cyclic transaction prior to goods or services for the transaction being accepted. Moreover, the quantity of items for certain cyclic transactions widely vary over time, with associated changes in billing and inventory needing to be made. In addition, different parties to a cyclic transaction often use unique accounting-type data, with automated processing limited to specific transaction parties or specific transaction interactions, with little flexibility.
Many cyclic transactions rely upon control data for controlling many different aspects of the transaction. Transaction terms such as those relating to the quantity of goods and/or services, the price per unit of goods and/or services, delivery conditions, payment terms and more are generally set before the transaction is executed and upon a transaction-by-transaction basis. When changes to transaction terms are made, related data must be updated. At times, these changes require changes for two or more parties to the transaction, with interaction required to adequately address the changes. Thus, when a user makes changes to transaction terms, manual interaction between the user and other parties to the transaction is typically required to ensure that the changes are made for all parties.
Another type of incompatibility that has made cyclic transaction processing difficult is related to the common scenario wherein reference numbers or codes used by different parties are not compatible. For example, in transactions involving buyers and sellers, sellers maintain transaction data organized using their own reference numbers or codes. Buyers typically must access the data using a seller's reference number or codes rather than the buyer's reference number. In addition, buyers and sellers typically use different reference numbers or codes for different characteristics of the transaction, making the monitoring and management of recurring transactions difficult. In particular, where changes are made to recurring transactions, as is more likely over time as relative, for example, to one-time transactions, those changes are difficult to monitor and respond to.
Payment and billing related aspects of traditional recurring transactions are particularly susceptible to billing errors and fraud. For example, there often is little to no connection between the delivery of goods and the billing for the delivery and/or the goods, or no connection between different types of accounting information used for related delivery and billing purposes. This may result in double billing, no billing at all, or overbilling. Auditing errors that cause incorrect billing or payment may also occur. In addition, payment can often be delayed while aspects of a particular transaction are being audited and/or disputed, particularly when different transaction documents must be manually parsed and processed. In addition, when the terms of a recurring transaction are changed, the implementation of those changes is often difficult to address for ensuring proper payment and billing. Delay associated with billing reduces working capital resources for parties to the transaction waiting for payment. Moreover, as time passes, payment events such as payment initiation and termination events may vary in occurrence and type.
Additional costs also arise as a result of existing inefficiencies in a variety of recurring transaction-processing approaches. Many of the costs are individually small, but very large in the aggregate. For example, typical parties to transactions incur administrative costs including those relating to creating and delivering transaction documents, resolving billing disputes, providing a signed copy of documents to other parties and posting accounts receivable. In addition, the cost of parsing, recognizing and categorizing documents related to these and other items add to the administrative costs of transactions.
An additional challenge to transaction management is related to the inability to obtain immediate information regarding a transaction. Transaction data from one party is typically not readily available to other transaction parties without direct access to private-party systems. Since the process of interacting and sharing data for transaction management is largely conducted manually, it is very difficult to track a transaction and real-time data is particularly difficult to come by. For example, there are various manual steps involved in order to learn of the status of performance or payment for a recurring transaction.
The above and other difficulties associated with the management and coordination of transactions have presented challenges to transaction processing, and in particular, to the processing of recurring transactions with the various unique aspects related thereto.
The present invention is directed to overcoming the above-mentioned challenges and others related to the types of approaches and implementations discussed above and in other applications involving recurring transactions. The present invention is exemplified in a number of implementations and applications, some of which are summarized below.
According to an example embodiment of the present invention, recurring transactions are managed using an approach generally involving the use of transaction information for processing payment-related aspects of the recurring transactions.
In a more particular example embodiment of the present invention, cyclic or other recurring-type characteristics assigned to a particular transaction using data based rules are used to process transaction data. When transaction data is received, the data is associated with transaction data based rules using information received with the transaction data. This association is used to identify (e.g., assign) recurring characteristics to use in processing the transaction data, such as for payment-related aspects of the transaction to which the data applies. These payment-related aspects may involve, for example, a payment initiation (e.g., on a recurring cycle) and a payment termination (e.g., at the completion of recurring cycles).
In another example embodiment of the present invention, a transaction-processing system is adapted for managing a plurality of recurring transactions involving merchant offerings among parties including buyers and sellers. The system includes a transaction databank arrangement that implements one or more data storage devices at one or more distinct locations and that is adapted to store information for recurring transactions between buyers and sellers. The stored information generally includes data associated with conditions of the recurring transaction upon which payment is authorized or otherwise facilitated. A transaction processor is adapted to receive transaction-based data from parties to a transaction and, for each particular recurring transaction, to associate transaction-based data with conditions of the recurring transaction upon which payment is authorized. Using the associated conditions, the transaction processor facilitates payment for each transaction. In some applications, the transaction processor further updates the transaction databank arrangement with billed quantities for the recurring transaction, reflecting a quantity or other characteristic of goods and/or services associated with the recurring transaction as indicated in the received transaction-based data.
According to another example embodiment of the present invention a transaction-processing system processes recurring transactions involving merchant offerings among parties including buyers and sellers. The system includes a transaction databank and a computer (processing) arrangement that interacts with the transaction databank for processing the transactions. The databank, implemented in a single or distributed arrangement, is adapted to store information for a plurality of recurring transactions between buyers and sellers. The stored information includes data associated with conditions of each recurring transaction between a buyer and a seller and upon which conditions payment for invoices can be selectively authorized on behalf of the buyer for each transaction. The computer arrangement is adapted to receive transaction data, audit payment of an invoice, authorize payment and update stored data for each particular recurring transaction. The received transaction-based data generally pertains to buyer and seller parties participating in the particular recurring transaction, with information including conditions upon which payment for invoices can be selectively authorized for the particular recurring transaction, which is stored in the transaction databank. The computer arrangement audits payment of an invoice for the particular recurring transaction as a function of data in the invoice and stored data that specifies conditions of the particular recurring transaction upon which payment can be authorized. The computer arrangement authorizes payment as a function of the audit, e.g., in response to the audit indicating that the recurring transaction is ripe for payment (e.g., payment is not premature) and/or that payment is appropriate based on conditions such as the quantity or merchant offerings that are the subject of the payment. Once payment is authorized, data characterizing billed quantities for the recurring transaction are updated in the transaction databank arrangement to include a billed quantity in the invoice for which payment is authorized.
The above summary of the present invention is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the present invention. The figures and detailed description that follow more particularly exemplify these embodiments.
The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not necessarily to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The present invention is believed to be applicable to a variety of different types of approaches and interactions, and has been found to be particularly useful for applications involving the processing of recurring transactions and related aspects thereof. While the present invention is not necessarily limited to such approaches, various aspects of the invention may be appreciated through a discussion of various examples using these and other contexts.
According to an example embodiment of the present invention, a transaction management system uses stored recurring transaction information to manage a transaction involving the exchange of merchant offerings (e.g., goods and/or services) between a buyer and a seller. Payment for the transaction is automatically audited and authorized as a function of the stored recurring transaction information. Upon receipt of invoice-type data (e.g., via an electronic document or other data transfer approach), the invoice-type data is parsed and associated with a particular recurring transaction. The invoice-type data may be generated, for example, by a party to the transaction or automatically (e.g., by the transaction management system) as defined by programming and stored recurring transaction rules. Item quantities such as goods and/or services associated with the invoice-type data are compared with stored recurring transaction characteristics to determine a payment-related condition. The payment-related condition is then used to determine whether the payment should be made and/or whether conditions relating to the payment such as timing and amount (known and/or estimated) should be taken into consideration. For instance, the transaction management system can be programmed to automatically authorize payment (partial or full) for the transaction when the payment-related condition meets selected criteria. If an invoice is premature (i.e., before a contracted payment date), the invoice can be stored for processing once the payment matures. With this approach, a multitude of types of recurring transactions can be automatically managed.
In one implementation, the transaction management system is configured to manage term characteristics of the recurring transaction. For example, the life and frequency of a particular recurring transaction can be managed using fixed and/or variable type data. Fixed data relating to specific times or time periods can be programmed into the transaction management system. Variable data such as conditions life or term related data can also be programmed into the transaction management system (e.g., the life of a recurring transaction expires after a selected quantity of goods and/or services are rendered).
As another example, transaction events such as a payment initiation event or payment termination event can be used to trigger term characteristics of the transaction. For instance, where a particular recurring transaction is to be carried out on a specified cycle for a set time period, a payment initiation event can be used to start the time period. A payment initiation event can also be used to start other functions, such as tracking functions for quantity of goods and/or services rendered. Payment termination events can similarly be used to trigger other term characteristics of the transaction, such as by ending the transaction with a payment termination event. For instance, a payment flagged as a final payment, or a payment that results in a total amount for a particular transaction having been satisfied, such as for a loan, can be used as an indication that a particular transaction should be ended.
In another example embodiment, payment is authorized in accordance with one or more conditions of delivery. The condition(s) of delivery may include, for example, conditions relating to the physical receipt of the goods by a buyer and/or the acceptance/rejection of the goods by a buyer. For instance, payment can be authorized as a function of a certain percentage of the items pertaining to the transaction being delivered as indicated on an invoice. In this regard, the transaction management system authorizes payment when stored recurring transaction information for the transaction associated with the invoice indicates that delivery has been perfected in a manner consistent with the condition of delivery. In some instances, the transaction management system automatically generates an invoice in response to receiving confirmation of delivery in accordance with conditions of delivery sufficient to authorize payment.
In another example embodiment of the present invention, payment is authorized as a function of timing characteristics associated with the particular recurring transaction. For example, parties to the recurring transaction may agree on a particular payment relationship involving the payment for goods/services at a specified time after performance, or on a particular date for outstanding balances. For instance, where parties agree that a cyclic payment is to be made on the 15th of the month, with payments being made for transactions having a particular transaction closing date (e.g., the last day of the previous month).
In other implementations, timing characteristics are related to the performance of the transaction, such as a time of delivery or service. For instance, the amount of payment for the recurring transaction may be predicated by the timing of delivery of goods for the transaction (e.g., with longer delivery times resulting in lower payment). The timing of the performance of a recurring service transaction may be predicated by the date that the service is performed. In this regard, performance characteristics relating to the transactions can be tied to payment.
In another example embodiment of the present invention, a recurring transaction involving a fixed payment is managed with a transaction management system. Transactions to which this approach is amenable include, for example, rental contracts for building space, lease contracts for equipment or automobiles, insurance contracts, service contracts and more. A transaction management system stores characteristics of a recurring transaction for a particular party to a transaction and automatically manages the payment of fees associated with the recurring transaction. In some instances, invoices are automatically generated. In other instances, invoices received are automatically paid. In still other instances, invoices and payments are automatically processed by the transaction management system.
A variable payment approach is used in another implementation, where recurring transaction rules are used to audit invoice-type data in order to authorize an indicated payment. Parties to a transaction agree upon and store transaction-based rules at a transaction management system. These rules include information that can be used by the transaction management system to evaluate a particular payment amount. When invoice-type data is received (or generated) at the transaction management system, the recurring transaction rules associated with the parties to the transaction for which the invoice-type data is generated are used to determine whether a payment can be made and, in some applications, when the payment is to be made.
In some instances, the recurring transaction rules include tolerance (e.g., percentage) information, where payments within a particular range of a target value can be automatically authorized. For example, where a recurring transaction is a utility transaction for heating gas, a target value can be programmed into the transaction management system. This target value can also be tailored to a particular month of the year, with heating-season months generally having a higher target value than non-heating season months. Information used to set the target value may be based on historical data, such as heating gas usage in a previous year, current heating gas prices and average temperature conditions. Recurring transaction rules can be made to automatically approve heating gas invoices within a particular range (e.g., 10%) of target value. The billed amount on a heating gas invoice is processed to determine whether it is within range of a particular target value, with the target value optionally being set using one or more of the above conditions. If the amount billed is within range, the transaction management system automatically authorizes payment. If the amount billed is out of range, payment is not authorized. In some instances, the transaction management system is programmed to pay up to an authorized amount for an out-of range bill. In other instances, the transaction management system is further optionally programmed to automatically flag the invoice-type data for follow-up to determine whether the out of range portion of the bill can be paid.
In another example embodiment of the present invention, the transaction management system interacts with one or more financial institutions for effecting payment. In this regard, the transaction management system uses recurring transaction data for parties to a transaction to determine a condition of payment for a transaction as discussed above. Rules regarding a relationship between a financial institution and a party (e.g., buyer) to the transaction are the used to authorize payment from the financial institution, on behalf of the party to the transaction, to another party (e.g., seller) to the transaction.
In one implementation, the financial institution automatically pays a seller on a cyclic basis as defined by parties to the transaction and in relation to a cyclic nature of goods and/or services pertaining to the transaction. For example, payment from a financial institution to a seller for a cyclic transaction can be effected on a calendar basis (e.g., the 1st of each month) using the transaction management system to trigger payment. The financial institution then collects payment from the buyer in one or more of a variety of manners, using the transaction management system or otherwise. In addition, the financial institution can pay multiple sellers in this manner for a particular buyer, with the buyer correspondingly making a single payment to the financial institution for all payable amounts based on the cyclic transaction.
In another example embodiment of the present invention, the transaction management system automatically categorizes components of recurring transactions into expense type categories for the buyer for whom payment is being authorized. For instance, where a recurring transaction involved the purchase of goods and services relating to different types of business expenses, the transaction management system not only manages the recurring nature of the transaction, it also automatically categorizes components of each recurring transaction into expense-related categories. For general information regarding transaction management and for specific information regarding the classification of expenditures to which the recurring management approaches discussed herein may apply, reference may be made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/121,158 entitled “Transaction Accounting Processing System and Approach” and filed on May 7, 2005. This patent document is fully incorporated herein by reference.
According to another example embodiment of the present invention, recurring interactions are managed using an approach that facilitates automatically processing certain interaction data as a function of common characteristics of the data. Interaction data from two sources (e.g., two documents) is compared and common data that is found in both sources is used to define a particular interaction category. Additional sources bearing the common data are thus grouped into the particular interaction category. For each category and, in some instances, for each type of document or sub-category within each category, recurring attributes are managed and monitored, with recurring transactions being used to automatically update related transaction data. With this approach, interaction data is automatically categorized into groups that can be used to identify documents and other interaction data that belongs to a particular interaction. For general information regarding interactions and for specific information regarding transactions and the use of comparison and grouping of interaction data to which one or more example embodiments discussed herein may apply, reference may be made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/864,761 entitled “Automated Transaction Processing System and Approach,” filed Jun. 9, 2004 and fully incorporated herein by reference.
Turning now to the figures,
A plurality of user nodes 120, 122, 124, 126 and 128 are communicatively coupled to the transaction processor 110 for passing transaction-related information. The user nodes include one or more of a variety of transaction parties related to a transaction, such as buyers, sellers, shippers, carriers, financial institutions and regulatory entities. For this example description, the user nodes are implemented as follows: user nodes 120-N represent buyers, 122-N represent sellers, 124-N represent seller financial institutions, 126-N represent buyer financial institutions and 128 represents an administrator that manages and otherwise operates the transaction processor 110.
The recurring transaction engine 115 is programmed to employ the recurring transaction rules 113 stored in the database 112 and/or at one of the user nodes 120-128 to automatically determine a payment-related condition of transactions, such as that related to invoice-type data received via, or generated on behalf of, one of the sellers 122-N. The recurring transaction engine 115 determines whether payment for a recurring transaction is appropriate for a variety of transactions, such as in connection with one or more of the above-discussed approaches to the management and processing of recurring transactions. In this regard, when payment-related data is received (or generated) at the transaction processor 110, the recurring transaction engine 115 automatically associates the payment-related data with one or more of the buyer (120-N) and seller (122-N) parties associated with the transaction using the transaction party profile data 114 in the database 112. For example, when transaction data specifies a particular ID or other data that is assigned to the buyer 120 and the seller 122 (or to a transaction therebetween) in the transaction party profile data 114, the recurring transaction engine 115 associates the transaction data with the buyer and seller.
Using the association, recurring transaction rules 113 for one or more of the buyer, seller and transaction therebetween are implemented by the recurring transaction engine 115 to audit the transaction data for authorizing payment therefor. Payment authorization is thus generally based upon user-defined rules that are stored with the recurring transaction rules 113. For instance, in some applications, the recurring transaction rules 113 specify, for a particular transaction, that payment-related data be compared against stored recurring transaction data to determine a condition relating to the payment for goods and/or services that are the subject of the recurring transaction. If certain conditions (e.g., quantity delivered, approval of delivered goods, percentage of services performed) are met, the recurring transaction engine 115 authorizes payment. If these certain conditions are not met, the recurring transaction engine 115 does not authorize payment. Other conditions upon which payment can be made include, for example, one or more of a payment request date in an invoice, a previous payment date, a previous payment amount, an amount of credit available for use on the buyer's behalf, and a payment request amount in the invoice.
Once payment is authorized, a payment processor 116 uses the authorization to facilitate payment to the seller 122 on behalf of the buyer 120 using transaction party profile data 114 and/or recurring transaction rules 113 applicable to one or both of the buyer and seller. Facilitating payment, in this regard, involves one or more of a variety of functions, depending upon the application; such functions include, for example, one or more of transferring funds, extending credit and sending payment authorization. For instance, where the buyer's profile data stored in the database 112 indicates that payment is to be made from the buyer financial institution 126, and where the seller's similarly-stored profile data indicates that payment is to be made to the seller financial institution 124, the payment processor engine 116 initiates the payment. Where credit is to be extended, an amount of credit available to the buyer is made available via the profile data and used to determine a condition of payment (or ability to pay). The payment to the seller financial institution 124 is made directly from the buyer financial institution 126 or, in some applications (e.g., as programmed at the transaction processor 110), to the administrator 128, which in turn sends payment to the seller financial institution 124. In some applications, one or more of the financial institutions 124-N and 126-N have profile information stored with the transaction party profile data 114 and used by the payment processor 116 to interact therewith for facilitating payment. In other applications, one or more of the financial institutions 124-N and 126-N do not have profile information stored in the database 112, but do have sufficient information stored with particular buyer and/or seller profiles in the database 112 for use by the payment processor 116 in facilitating payment.
A fee processor 117 assesses a fee against one or more transaction parties, on behalf of the administrator 128, for processing the recurring transactions. These fees are assessed, for example, as a function of a transaction amount (e.g., a certain percentage thereof), a flat fee per transaction or a fee per amount of usage by a particular transaction party. For instance, keeping with the example of a recurring transaction between the buyer 120 and the seller 122, the fee processor 117 assesses a fee against the seller 122 (or, if selected, the buyer 120) for processing the transactions, with the fee reflecting each recurrence of the recurring transaction.
In some applications, as discussed in part above, the recurring transaction engine 115 processes payment-related conditions that are generated by the recurring transaction engine 115 at the direction of buyer and seller parties engaging in the recurring transaction. For example, where the buyer 120 and seller 122 agree to recurring transaction terms specifying that a payment be made on the first of each month for a year in a specified amount for a particular good or service, the recurring transaction rules 113 for the recurring transaction specify these terms. Once specified, the recurring transaction engine 115 automatically generates a payment authorization on the first of each month, in the specified amount, every month for a year. Taking this example further, the authorization for the payment may specify that the buyer 120 must agree to the payment before it is made, such that the recurring transaction engine 115 generates a payment authorization on the first of the month, in response to an agreement received from the buyer 120. A variety of such payment-related conditions are thus specifiable by parties to transactions processed by the transaction processor 110, as stored in the recurring transaction rules 113 and used to initiate and/or authorize payment for a recurring transaction.
The database 112 can be used to store transaction-related data that can be tailored for characteristics of specific transactions. The stored transaction-related data may include, for example, transaction party profile data 114 that specifies the identity of parties to the transaction. The recurring transaction rules 113 may specify the identity of the transaction (e.g., transaction-specific number, loan number, and account number), beginning and/or ending payment dates and fixed or flexible payment amounts. In addition, processing data such as that used for determining what criteria is sufficient for authorizing payment and for notification of payment-related timing characteristics (e.g., notice of service acceptance) is selectively stored with the recurring transaction rules 113. In this regard, data for each recurring transaction served by the database can be stored accordingly having data of a specific recurring nature as identified, for example, by timing and processing characteristics.
In some instances, the transaction processor 110 is adapted to automatically exchange data with one or more user nodes, with authorization data being used to control information access at one or both of the transaction processor and the user node(s). For instance, using data source identification (e.g., address) and authorization (e.g., password) information stored with the transaction party profile data 114 at the database 112, the transaction processor 110 can access remote data sources at one or more of the user nodes 120-128. Program information stored at the database 112 is used for extracting information from remote data sources. Extracted information includes, for example, payment-related conditions for recurring transactions, payment initiation information, payment termination information and/or merchant offerings provided to a buyer. A comparison and/or other processing approach involving the extracted information is selectively implemented for auditing aspects of and/or facilitating payment for the transaction.
Using user node 120 as an example and wherein the user node includes a processor and a data source (e.g., the user node 120 is a computer), the transaction processor 110 selectively interacts with the processor at the user node 120 to retrieve information stored at the data source. Similarly, a user a user node 120 can, with proper programming and access authorization, access the database 112 via the transaction processor 110 for retrieving, changing and/or storing data, when a request for such access matches information stored with the transaction party profile data 114.
In another implementation, one or more of the user nodes 120-128 includes a user interface configured for receiving information that can be used for interacting with the transaction processor. The user interface may be generated at the user node (using, e.g., an application program), or generated by the transaction processor 110 and accessible by users at the user nodes via a network such as the Internet. In these applications, the user interface facilitates the exchange of information, such as requests for reports, the storage of profile or transaction rule information in the database 112, or data relating to the provision of an invoice.
A variety of transaction events can be used in initiating payment for a particular recurring transaction, depending upon the particular application. These payment initiating events are stored with the recurring transaction rules 116 in the database 112 and implemented by the recurring transaction engine 115 to initiate a payment request (e.g., to facilitate the processing of a received or generated invoice). One such example transaction between the buyer 120 and the seller 122 has a monthly payment cycle, with the transaction event being the first day of each month. In this regard, on the first day of the month, the recurring transaction engine 115 facilitates the initiation of a payment request. In some applications, the recurring transaction rules 116 simply indicate that payment is to be made in a particular amount on the first of the month. In other applications, the recurring transaction rules 116 specify that payment can be made on the first of the month, when certain other criteria are met. Such criteria include, e.g., the seller 122 providing an invoice, the buyer 120 approving an invoice, the buyer acknowledging the receipt of goods and/or services, or an invoice matching, or falling within a particular tolerance of, a predefined amount. Where a new transaction is initiated, a payment initiation may involve the receipt of a notice of service acceptance by the buyer 120. After a first such payment initiation, the recurring transaction rules 113 are used to generate a recurring payment request on the first day of the month, with this example.
At block 210, cyclic accounting profile attributes are stored for a plurality of transaction parties such as buyers, sellers and financial institutions via which payment for transactions between buyers and sellers is transferred. These cyclic accounting profile attributes are stored in a database arrangement. Cyclic transaction events are generated using the stored cyclic accounting profile attributes at block 220. These accounting profile attributes may specify, for example, conditions upon which a transaction event such as a payment initiation is generated (e.g., a date, the receipt of a particular set of data from a transaction party such as a receipt for goods and/or services, or quantity data indicating that a particular item is below a specified level and reorder is appropriate).
Upon receipt of an invoice for a cyclic transaction event at block 230, the transaction database is parsed to identify received items corresponding to the invoice. That is, where an invoice specifies a particular item for which payment is requested, the database is parsed to identify corresponding items. In this regard, if received items in the database indicate a payable condition for the invoice at block 240 (i.e., items for which payment is requested on the invoice have been delivered), payment for the invoice is authorized at block 250. In addition, once payment is authorized and also in connection with block 250, a payment field is updated to reflect the payment for the received items in the database.
If the received items as indicated in the database do not indicate a payable condition for an invoice at block 240, the invoice is placed into a not-payable status at block 260. Such a not-payable status is generally maintained together with the invoice data until such time as the invoice becomes payable. In this regard, the status of the received items as stored in the database is monitored at block 270 and, when the received items indicate a payable condition for the invoice at block 240, payment is facilitated at block 250 as discussed above.
In some applications, and again referring to
At block 310, transaction data having cyclic transaction identification information is received and cyclic transaction data fields (e.g., stored in a database) are parsed for data that matches the received data at block 320. The identification information includes, for example, buyer or seller identification numbers, a transaction identification number or other information that can be used for associating the transaction data with a particular transaction. If the cyclic transaction identification information does not match stored cyclic transaction data in the data fields at block 330, the process stops at block 340. If there is such a match at block 330, but an update to the stored cyclic transaction information is not allowed (e.g., if the information received at block 310 does not have proper authorization or if access to the stored information is somehow restricted) at block 350, the process stops at block 340.
If there is a match at block 330 and updates are allowed at block 350, the stored cyclic transaction data is updated at block 360 with the transaction data received at block 310. In some applications, notification regarding the update data is provided to associated parties to the cyclic transaction at block 370.
The central processor 410 controls the storage of and access to recurring transaction data at storage locations 420, 430, 440 and 450. The storage location 420 is used to store profile information for transaction parties, as applicable to different transactions in which the parties are involved. Each of the storage locations 430-450 is assigned to a particular recurring transaction, with data associated with the particular recurring transaction stored therewith, and including information specifying one or more profiles, in the storage location 420, that apply to the particular recurring transaction.
The data stored in the cyclic transaction data storage locations 430-450 generally includes sufficient information for facilitating payment for recurrences of a particular cyclic transaction, such as information identifying a recurring date or other event at which payment is to be processed, as well as data identifying parties and, ultimately, payment conditions. In some applications, where appropriate, other cyclic transaction data such as order amounts, thresholds, stock levels and others as discussed herein are stored with the cyclic transaction data storage locations 430-450.
While certain aspects of the present invention have been described with reference to several particular example embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that many changes may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, aspects of which are set forth in the following claims.
This patent document claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 60/578,689 and 60/578,429, respectively entitled “Automated Cyclic Transaction Processing System and Approach” and “Automated Transaction Processing System and Approach,” both filed on Jun. 9, 2004; this application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/864,761, entitled “Automated Transaction Processing System and Approach,” also filed on Jun. 9, 2004.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4114027 | Slater et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4270042 | Case | May 1981 | A |
| 4305059 | Benton | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4412287 | Braddock, III | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4507778 | Tan | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4567359 | Lockwood | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4713761 | Sharpe et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4725719 | Oncken et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4750119 | Cohen et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4926325 | Benton et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4949272 | Vanourek et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4960981 | Benton et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4992940 | Dworkin | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4995112 | Aoyama | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4996662 | Cooper et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5008827 | Sansone et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5017766 | Tamada et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5025372 | Burton et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5040132 | Schuricht et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5043908 | Manduley et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5054096 | Beizer | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5077694 | Sansone et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5117364 | Barns-Slavin et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5151948 | Lyke | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5153842 | Dlugos, Sr. et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5159667 | Borrey et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5161109 | Keating et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5168444 | Cukor et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5175416 | Mansvelt et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5208446 | Martinez | May 1993 | A |
| 5218188 | Hanson | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5220501 | Lawlor et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5222018 | Sharpe et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5231569 | Myatt et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5238349 | Grace, Sr. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5285383 | Lindsey et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5293310 | Carroll et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5329589 | Fraser et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5334823 | Noblett, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5334824 | Martinez | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5337246 | Carroll et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5357563 | Hamilton et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5393963 | Thomas et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5426281 | Abecassis | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5440634 | Jones et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5483445 | Pickering | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5485369 | Nicholls et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5500513 | Langhans et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5631821 | Muso | May 1997 | A |
| 5631827 | Nicholls et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5652749 | Davenport et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5666493 | Wojcik et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5671362 | Cowe et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5677955 | Doggett et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5694334 | Donahue et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5694551 | Doyle et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5699528 | Hogan | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5712990 | Henderson | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5719771 | Buck et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5732400 | Mandler | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5754854 | Kanamori et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5770844 | Henn | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774170 | Hite et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5790790 | Smith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5794207 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5799286 | Morgan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5806063 | Dickens | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5842178 | Giovannoli | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5845283 | Williams | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5870719 | Maritzen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5893080 | McGurl et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5896530 | White | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897645 | Watters | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5910896 | Hahn-Carlson | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917830 | Chen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918216 | Miksovsky et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918229 | Davis et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5920847 | Kolling et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5924082 | Silverman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5924089 | Silverman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930363 | Stanford et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5931917 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5943670 | Prager et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5956690 | Haggerson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956700 | Landry | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960407 | Vivona | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5970475 | Barnes et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5973475 | Schaffa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978567 | Rebane et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5982891 | Ginter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987506 | Carter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991728 | DeBusk et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991801 | Rebec et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995976 | Walker et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6012041 | Brewer et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016477 | Ehnebuske et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021202 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026374 | Chess | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6029140 | Martin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6029150 | Kravitz | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6043819 | LeBrun et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044362 | Neely | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6047268 | Bartoli et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055519 | Kennedy et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6058380 | Anderson et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6070150 | Remington et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6085200 | Hill et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6097834 | Krouse et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6115649 | Sakata | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6115711 | White | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119163 | Montiero et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6128602 | Northington et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6131087 | Luke et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141653 | Conklin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6151588 | Tozzoli et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6157924 | Austin | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167378 | Webber, Jr. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6169542 | Hooks et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6199046 | Heinzle et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6204763 | Sone | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6209095 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6223168 | McGurl et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6236972 | Shkedy | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6246994 | Wolven et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254000 | Degen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6260024 | Shkedy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266640 | Fromm et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267292 | Walker et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6275813 | Berka | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6285916 | Kadaba et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6317737 | Gorelik et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6323894 | Katz et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324522 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
| 6324551 | Lamping et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6330550 | Brisebois et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6338044 | Cook et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6357042 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
| 6366289 | Wallace | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6381587 | Guzelsu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6389402 | Ginter et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6418441 | Call | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6421691 | Kajitani | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6442533 | Hinkle | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6477510 | Johnson | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6486899 | Bush et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6490567 | Gregory | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6493685 | Ensel et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6499036 | Gurevich | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6505169 | Bhagavath et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6505172 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6507826 | Maners | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6510383 | Jones | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6510384 | Okano | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6526443 | Goldsmith et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6539360 | Kadaba | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6571149 | Hahn-Carlson | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6598026 | Ojha et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6607081 | Graef et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6629081 | Cornelius et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6673479 | McArthur et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6684384 | Bickerton et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6687713 | Mattson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6697702 | Hahn-Carlson | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6704612 | Hahn-Carlson | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6721613 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6721715 | Nemzow | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6741968 | Jacoves et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6751630 | Franks et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6785661 | Mandler et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6789252 | Burke et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6792459 | Elnozahy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6820038 | Wetzer et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6829590 | Greener et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6832212 | Zenner et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6833865 | Fuller et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6850900 | Hare et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6873963 | Westbury et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6873997 | Majjasie et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6879962 | Smith et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6882983 | Furphy et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6882986 | Heinemann et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6889194 | Kadaba | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6895438 | Ulrich | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6915268 | Riggs et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6937922 | Benda et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6941281 | Johnson | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6944595 | Graser et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6973258 | Yoo et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6983278 | Yu et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6988111 | Chow et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6999943 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7047210 | Srinivasan | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7054841 | Tenorio | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7069234 | Cornelius et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7069248 | Huber | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7076652 | Ginter et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7079176 | Freeman et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7099304 | Liu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7110959 | Hahn-Carlson | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7110979 | Tree | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7113964 | Bequet et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7117170 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7120871 | Harrington | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7124150 | Majjasie et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7130822 | Their et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7131069 | Rush et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7133835 | Fusz et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7136467 | Brockman et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7143058 | Sugimoto et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7146337 | Ward et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7149744 | Tenorio | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7162458 | Flangan et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7177836 | German et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7181017 | Nagel et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7203662 | Das et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7206768 | DeGroeve et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7222081 | Sone | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7243139 | Ullman et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7254588 | Sung et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7257560 | Jacobs et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7263506 | Lee et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7324976 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7327952 | Enomoto | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7340433 | Kay et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7346575 | Ahles et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7363261 | Whitehead et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7366684 | Douglas | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7373365 | Varadarajan et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7386502 | Butcher, III | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7392934 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7415471 | Coleman | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7415617 | Ginter et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7433845 | Flitcroft et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7437310 | Dutta | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7448063 | Freeman et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7475024 | Phan | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7496519 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7499875 | May et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
| 7529706 | Kulasooriya et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7536354 | DeGroeve et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
| 7536362 | Starr et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7548884 | Thomas | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7558793 | Topolovac et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7574363 | Bodin | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7574386 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7587363 | Cataline et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7590575 | Yu et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7617146 | Keaton et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7627499 | Hahn-Carlson | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7634455 | Keene et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7640195 | Von Zimmermann et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7660788 | Clark | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7693791 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7702563 | Balson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7725372 | Hahn-Carlson | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7765136 | Northington et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7822653 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7890395 | Phelan | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7925551 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7970671 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8050938 | Green et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
| 8060410 | Hahn-Carlson | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8069054 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8103575 | Hinkle | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8126785 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8266024 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8392285 | Hahn-Carlson | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8396811 | Hahn-Carlson | Mar 2013 | B1 |
| 20010009002 | Logan et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010011241 | Nemzow | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010014878 | Mitra | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010025262 | Ahmed | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010032154 | Schlummer | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010032171 | Brink et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010032183 | Landry | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010039522 | Saxon | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010047311 | Singh | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010056395 | Khan | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020007302 | Work et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020016765 | Sacks et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020026374 | Moneymaker et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032649 | Selvarajan | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035488 | Aquila et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020038277 | Yuan | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020038305 | Bahl et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020040304 | Shenoy et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042782 | Albazz et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046081 | Albazz et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046125 | Speicher et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046147 | Livesay et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046169 | Keresman et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020048369 | Ginter et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049622 | Lettich et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020055850 | Powell et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059122 | Inoue et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059134 | Ebbs et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020062278 | Ingram et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065736 | Willner et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065738 | Riggs et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069177 | Carrott et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020072956 | Willems et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077978 | O'Leary et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087344 | Billings et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087455 | Tsagarakis | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020095355 | Walker et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103661 | Albazz et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107761 | Kark et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107794 | Furphy et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111886 | Chenevich et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116288 | Nakajima | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116334 | Bennett et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116348 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120570 | Loy | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020123919 | Brockman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020123973 | Eccles et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143858 | Teague et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147655 | Say | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156797 | Lee et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161719 | Manning et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174034 | Au et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184527 | Chun et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194174 | Calkins et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198829 | Ludwig et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198833 | Wohlstadter | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030004823 | Sagy | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030005876 | Boswell | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030014325 | Biffar et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018563 | Kilgour et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030026404 | Joyce et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030033205 | Nowers et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030033240 | Balson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030041008 | Grey et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046089 | Menninger et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050876 | Tawara et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055675 | Twennaar | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055779 | Wolf | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055783 | Cataline et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074206 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074298 | Daum | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093320 | Sullivan | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097318 | Yu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115129 | Feaver | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030117446 | Esposito-Ross et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126047 | Hollar et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135425 | Leavitt | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135435 | Aharoni | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139985 | Hollar et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144901 | Coulter et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149674 | Good et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030154163 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158811 | Sanders et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030163431 | Ginter et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187796 | Swift et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191711 | Jamison et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195815 | Li et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200172 | Randle | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200185 | Huerta et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212617 | Stone et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220863 | Holm et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030225883 | Greaves et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233252 | Haskell et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233286 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233292 | Richey et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233321 | Scolini et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040010463 | Hahn-Carlson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040019562 | Viberg | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034578 | Oney et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039696 | Harmon et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049446 | Seljeseth | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068431 | Smith et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040095237 | Chen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098350 | Labrou et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098663 | Rey et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040107123 | Haffner et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040107125 | Guheen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117383 | Lee et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040123129 | Ginter et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139032 | Rowan | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153389 | Lortscher | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153403 | Sadre | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153407 | Club et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158510 | Fisher | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172360 | Mabrey et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172368 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181468 | Harmon et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040184163 | Nishioka et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186806 | Sinclair et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040187075 | Maxham et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040201074 | Khandros et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225574 | Arnold et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230536 | Fung et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230601 | Joao et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243690 | Hancock et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254808 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260634 | King et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050015332 | Chen | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021363 | Stimson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021527 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027613 | Takekuma et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027651 | DeVault et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033660 | Solomon | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033760 | Fuller et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055306 | Miller et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075964 | Quinn et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050119980 | Kohavi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125260 | Green et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131839 | Cordery et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137947 | Schaub et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149378 | Cyr et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050165699 | Hahn-Carlson | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177435 | Lidow | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177507 | Bandych et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192896 | Hutchison et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216368 | Wechsel | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234820 | MacKouse et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240592 | Mamou et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246192 | Jauffred et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251478 | Yanavi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256802 | Ammermann et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050274792 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278220 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278221 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278244 | Yuan | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278251 | Hahn-Carlson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278255 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050283437 | McRae et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289023 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289024 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060004670 | McKenney et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060010058 | D'Hers et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015454 | Hahn-Carlson | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036476 | Klem | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041487 | Santalo et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060116957 | May et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167762 | Hahn-Carlson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167791 | Hahn-Carlson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167792 | Hahn-Carlson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060233334 | Bingaman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287983 | Chauhan | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070022021 | Walker et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055582 | Hahn-Carlson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070136278 | Grazioli et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156584 | Barnes et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070192178 | Fung et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208635 | Van Luchene et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070214065 | Kahlon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070214077 | Barnes et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070246528 | Kubo et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070262140 | Long | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070271160 | Stone et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282724 | Barnes et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282744 | Barnes et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299769 | Fowler et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080082374 | Kennis et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080086396 | Hahn-Carlson | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103972 | Lanc | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080172314 | Hahn-Carlson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080215456 | West et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080249940 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080281752 | Chien | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090171727 | Hahn-Carlson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090192922 | Hahn-Carlson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259576 | Hahn-Carlson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090265274 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287590 | Hahn-Carlson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287598 | Hahn-Carlson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090292630 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090307114 | Hahn-Carlson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100017315 | Hahn-Carlson | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049650 | Keaton et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070397 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138325 | Hahn-Carlson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185540 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100205054 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20110004544 | Baum | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029404 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20120158558 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0339850 | Feb 1989 | EP |
| 0407026 | Jan 1991 | EP |
| 0425421 | May 1991 | EP |
| 0779587 | Jun 1997 | EP |
| 1659526 | May 2006 | EP |
| 2543327 | Sep 1984 | FR |
| 2398894 | Sep 2004 | GB |
| 2001312680 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| WO 9707468 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| WO 9908218 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO 0062225 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO 0109782 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO 0135570 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO 0148659 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0182193 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 0188813 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 0126017 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 0221405 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO 0206920 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO 03034178 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 2005124635 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006071881 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2008045793 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Spencer et al., “JIT Systems and external logistics suppliers,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v14, n6, pp. 60-74, 1994. |
| White, How Computers Work, Sep. 1999, 93 pp. |
| Professional Builder (1993) www.highbeam.com, Contracts & Law: Part III 8 pp. |
| South China Morning Post, Hong Kong, Buying “Products over the Net,” Jul. 2000, 2 pp. |
| Xcitek Press Release, “U.S. Bank Selects Xcitek for Corporate Actions Data and XSP for Corporate Actions Automation,” NY, NY, Dec. 2003, 1 pp. |
| Berhad, “Fueling financial oil for the economy,” The New Straits Times Press (Malaysia), Dec. 10, 2001, 3 pp. |
| Singh, “A new road to recovery,” Risk, pp. 108-110, Sep. 2004. |
| “Credit Derivatives and Mortgage-backed Bonds in Capital Adequacy Requirements for Market Risk,” http://www.rahoitustarkastus.fi/Eng/Regulation/FSA—standards/FSA—interpretations/4—2005.html, Apr. 2005, 5 pp. |
| Brochure: SAP Supplier Relationship Management—At a Glance, SAP, 2003, 16 pp. |
| Brochure: Self-Service Procurement: Slashing Costs and Saving Time, SAP, 2003, 12 pp. |
| Electronic Commerce News, “Sarbanes-Oxley Continue to be Key Issue in Corporate Payments Space,” Sep. 1, 2003, v8, issue 18, 7 pp. |
| Fletcher, “Limits on reinsurance offsets sought by California regulator,” Business Insurance, May 8, 1995 4 pp. |
| Denver Business Wire, “Jd Edwards Continues to drive network-centric applications delivery with OneWorld enhancements,” Jun. 16, 1997, p. 06160089. |
| Notice from the European Patent Office concerning business methods, dated Oct. 1, 2007, 2 pp. |
| Egan, “Administrative Orders from the Office of the Governor of Alaska,” Jul. 18, 1972, 3 pp. http://www.gov.state.ak.us/admin-orders/018.html. |
| Bodnar, “Estimating Exchange Rate Exposure: Issues in Model Structure,” Financial Management v32, n1, pp. 35-67, 2003. |
| Plewka, “Germany seizes the Emu initiative,” International Tax Review, v8, n5, pp. 43-46, May 1997. |
| Huang, “Exchange Risk and Exchange Rate Pass-Through,” v67/02-A of Dissertation Abstracts International, 2005. |
| McKeefry, “Seeking microcontrollers desperately,” Electronic Buyers News, n972, Sep. 11, 1995, 6 pp. |
| Mallory, Great Plains Accounting v.7 (Great Plains Software's accounting software) (Product Announcement), Apr. 22, 1993, 3 pp. |
| Russell, “Kitting out is now in (Use of component kits is expanding as distributors develop added-value activities),” Electronic Times (online), n 852, Apr. 17, 1997, 4 pp. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050283434 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60578689 | Jun 2004 | US | |
| 60578429 | Jun 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10864761 | Jun 2004 | US |
| Child | 11149978 | US |