The present invention is directed to oil control piston rings that form sliding oil barriers in pistons operating in cylindrical bores in liquid lubricated internal combustion engines and reciprocating pumps and compressors.
The oil control piston rings in internal combustion engines are essential to minimizing lubricating oil consumption, but at the same time are a major contributor to engine friction that increases fuel consumption. This is particularly true for light-duty vehicle engines that typically operate at part load where parasitic oil ring friction becomes a larger part of the total engine output. Oil control ring friction consumes an estimated 1 to 3% of engine fuel at full load and 2 to 6% at light load. Two embodiments of the inventive reduced friction oil control piston ring offer a means of reducing friction and resulting fuel consumption without increasing lubricating oil consumption. Both are novel assemblies that incorporate thin, low contact force oil scraper rails to reduce friction while retaining oil control performance. One is a five-piece assembly similar in many respects to conventional three-piece oil control rings which have a formed sheet metal spring expander and are used predominantly in light-duty reciprocating pistons. The second is also a five-piece assembly similar in many respects to two-piece oil control rings which have a wire helical spring expander that are used predominantly in heavy-duty applications. Fuel saving are expected to provide a quick payback of the cost of the additional components.
As the piston 102 reciprocates (downward motion 110 shown) in the bore 106, the scraper rails 105 remove most of the oil 111 on the cylinder bore and return it to the crankcase, leaving a thin film (not shown) to lubricate the upper portion of the piston and the compression rings 108 and 109. Oil 112 collected between the two scraper rails 105 is returned to the crankcase through oil drain holes 113 connecting the oil ring piston groove 101 to the inside of the piston 102. The contact area between a scraper rail 105 and the cylinder bore 106 acts as an oil-lubricated slider bearing, where the thickness of the oil film in the bearing zone is a major factor in determining the thickness of the oil film left on the cylinder bore surface. In this hydrodynamic mode the ring acts as a linear slider bearing of the type described in the Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers, 7th Edition, edited by Theodore Baumeister. Page 8-171 (1960) published by the McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. This lubrication theory indicates that the slider bearing oil film thickness ho is:
where L is the bearing contact zone width, μ is the oil viscosity, v is the sliding velocity, C is the bearing zone circumference and W is the total radial force on the bearing zone. Oil film thickness therefore decreases with a narrower contact zone or a higher radial force. Higher radial force, however, increases the friction force given by:
F∝√{square root over (WμνC)}
These equations show that a narrow ring with a low radial force is the lowest friction means of producing a given oil film thickness. There are limits, however, to how much the scraper rail bearing contact zone width and radial force in conventional three-piece oil control rings can be reduced. The scraper rails 105 must be thick enough to withstand the axial friction loads without excessive axial deflection in the unsupported bridge areas between expander 107 contact points, limiting how thin the rails can be. The outside diameter 114 of a standard thickness scraper rail can be beveled or profiled to form a narrower bearing contact zone to allow reduced radial force and friction, but this approach has drawbacks. The bearing zone width will tend to increase with ring wear, increasing the oil film thickness and oil consumption. Also, the scraper rail radial stiffness will not decrease in proportion to the reduced contact zone width and radial force. This limits the ability of the ring to conform to cylinder bore distortion, increasing oil film thickness and consumption in portions of the rail circumference having reduced contact force.
As with three-piece rings, there are limits to how much the width of the scrapers 303 and 304 contact zones and radial force in conventional two-piece oil control rings can be reduced. The scrapers 303 and 304 must be thick enough to withstand the axial friction loads without excessive bending stress and with a radial extent sufficient to allow for wear over the service life of the ring. The outside diameter of standard thickness scrapers rail can be beveled or profiled to form a narrower bearing contact zone to allow reduced radial force and friction, but this approach has drawbacks. The bearing zone width will tend to increase with ring wear, increasing the oil film thickness and oil consumption.
The proposed reduced friction oil control piston rings combine a narrow contact zone that is insensitive to wear with the radial flexibility to conform to cylinder bore distortion with reduced radial force. Like conventional control rings, they are installed in a piston groove below the two compression ring grooves and include a spring action expander. The difference is that the two individual circular steel scraper rails in three piece rings or the integral scrapers of two-piece rings are replaced by thin, flat scraper rail rings. The expander circumferential spring tension is reduced to provide the required oil film thickness with the thin scraper rails, thereby reducing ring friction while remaining flexible enough to conform to cylinder bore distortions. Additional elements are added to the ring assemblies to support the thin scraper rings. The first embodiment is a five-piece assembly in which the thin scraper rails are spring-loaded against the cylinder bore by the expander and in sliding contact with the adjacent piston groove surface. Thicker support flat rails that are not spring-loaded against the cylinder bore by the expander, and lightly loaded against the cylinder bore by their own elastic tension, are positioned between the scraper rails and the expander. The expander contacts only the sides of the two support rails, and positions them in the axial direction so that they are in sliding contact with the thin scraper rails. Radial clearance is provided between the support rail inside diameter and the expander. The thicker support rails serve to bridge the unsupported areas between expander contact points and prevent excessive deflection of the thin scraper rails caused by axial friction forces. The second embodiment is a five-piece assembly in which the thin scraper rails are spring-loaded against the cylinder bore by a helical coil spring expander acting through an intermediate bridge ring expander. The scraper rails are supported and held in sliding contact with the upper and lower piston groove surfaces by a floating spacer ring that separates the two thin scraper rings. The spacer ring is lightly loaded against the cylinder bore by its own elastic tension, but is not loaded by coil spring expander so it generates little friction. The spacer ring contacts only the sides of the two scraper rails, and supports them against axial friction forces.
The appended claims set forth those novel features that characterize the invention. However, the invention itself, as well as further objects and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of preferred embodiments. The accompanying drawings, where like reference characters identify like elements throughout the various figures in which:
Upon examination of the following detailed description the novel features of the present invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art or can be learned by practice of the present invention. It should be understood that the detailed description of the invention and the specific examples presented, while indicating certain embodiments of the present invention, are provided for illustration purposes only. Various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon examination of the following detailed description of the invention and claims that follow.
The prior art and the invention are described with reference to internal combustion engines, but it is to be understood that the invention is applicable to liquid lubricated oil control piston rings in other applications including gas compressors. In the description “upper”, “top”, “above” and “head” refer to the direction towards the combustion chamber, and “lower” and “downward” refer to the direction towards the crankcase.
The scraper rails 501 are supported on one side by the upper and lower piston groove surfaces 116 and 117 of piston groove 101 and on the other side by a thicker support rail 502, and therefore may be very thin and still withstand the axial friction loads and loads imposed by radial expander 500. Axial clearances are set such that the scraper rails 501 are free to slide radially relative to the support rails 502 and the piston groove surfaces 116 and 117. Similarly, the support rails are free to slide radially relative to the expander and the scraper rails. Oil control performance is maintained over the life of the ring assembly, since scraper rail 501 wear does not affect the width of the slider bearing zone. The radial stiffness of the thin scraper rail 501 decreases in proportion to the decreased bearing zone width and reduced radial force. This characteristic allows it to retain the ability of conventional three-piece ring assemblies to conform to cylinder bore distortions, but with reduced radial force and friction.
The trailing support rail 502A is pushed radially inward by the oil 505 collected by the adjacent trailing scraper rail 501A, and forms a dynamic gap 506 with the cylinder bore 106 that allows the oil to flow to the piston groove drain holes 113. This dynamic gap is shown for the down-stroke in
The net effect is the same as in the first embodiment: The scraper rails 802 and 803 are supported on one side by the upper and lower surfaces 116 and 117 of piston groove 101, and on the other side by the spacer ring 805, allowing the scrapers to be very thin and still withstand the axial friction loads and imposed radial loads. Axial clearances are set such that the scraper rails 802 and 803 are free to slide radially relative to the spacer ring and the piston groove. Similarly, the spacer ring position is independent of the bridge ring 804. Oil control performance is maintained over the life of the ring assembly, since wear of the scraper rails 802 and 803 does not affect the width of the slider bearing zone. The radial stiffness of the thin scraper rails 802 and 803 decreases in proportion to the decreased bearing zone width and reduced radial force. This characteristic allows it to retain the ability of conventional two-piece ring assemblies to conform to cylinder bore distortions, but with reduced radial force and friction.
As with the support rails 502, the spacer ring 805 is pushed radially inward by the oil 809 collected by the adjacent trailing scraper rail 802, and forms a dynamic gap 810 with the cylinder bore 106 that allows the oil to flow to the piston groove drain holes 113. This dynamic gap is shown for the down-stroke 110 in
This application claims the priority of U.S. provisional application 61/744,553.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/061350 | 9/24/2013 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61744553 | Sep 2012 | US |