1. Technical Field
The invention relates to ink jet printers. More particularly, the invention relates to an ink jet printer having low ink volume deposition per print pass.
2. Description of the Background Art
Digital UV inkjet printers have been in commercial production since 2000. The early printers used relatively low resolution print heads (90-100 dpi) with low numbers of nozzles per color (256-512) and printed at rates of approximately 250 square feet per hour (sf/h). Over time, the native resolutions of print heads have increased and the number of nozzles per color has increased in an attempt to build faster and faster printers. To achieve the higher print speeds, printer designers have arrayed multiple print heads in efficient arrangements where high resolution can be achieved as multiples of the native resolutions of the individual print heads. For instance, as in the EFI Vutek QS3200r, three Seiko print heads, native 180 dpi of 510 nozzles each can be arranged as three print heads per color in an array of 540 dpi of 1530 nozzles per color. Where a single print head per color results in a printer of 300 sf/h, the multi-head array printer has a top throughput of 900 sf/h.
As moving carriage printers have been designed to increase throughput (speed), the number of nozzles and step size have increased leading to substantial issues with an artifact variously referred to as tire tracking, gloss banding, or differential gloss banding. The artifact manifests in a differential gloss between passes, e.g. left to right versus right to left, of the last pass printed by the print heads over the substrate.
The period of banding is the step size of the media under the traversing print heads. The result is similar to viewing a mowed lawn or baseball field and seeing the directional passes of the lawn mower. In UV inkjet printing this differential gloss is a highly objectionable artifact that limits the speed of the printer and usefulness of the printed image in high image quality applications, such as point-of-purchase (POP) signage.
A substantial amount of work has been done to minimize this highly objectionable artifact. Countermeasures that are used to minimize gloss banding, require more interlacing, and thus lead to reduced throughput of the printer, i.e. more passes at lower resolutions and smaller step sizes to reduce gloss banding and other print artifacts reduce throughput to one-half or less of the maximum speed capability of the printer. State of the art corrective methods that attempt to address this problem may be understood by resort to, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,789,867 and European patent nos. EP06651, EP471488A, and EP0518670.
It would be advantageous to provide a technique for UV curable ink jet printing that improves the output quality of a printer by minimizing or eliminating gloss banding or tire tracking.
An embodiment of the invention provides a method and apparatus for UV curable ink jet printing that improves the output quality of a printer by minimizing or eliminating a print artifact referred to as gloss banding or tire tracking. In the state of the art, as more ink is applied in a pass, there is liquid-to-liquid interaction before the substrate goes under a pinning lamp or a curing lamp, and this produces the gloss banding or tire tracking artifact. In the past, dense application of ink has been thought to be a very desirable way of forming an image because it is the most compact, and thus provides the most throughput. An embodiment of the invention uses the same or a similar number of nozzles to achieve a desired throughput, but the nozzles are arranged so that at any given square inch of substrate to which ink is being applied receives a lower amount of ink. To accomplish this, an embodiment of the invention applies ink to the substrate over a larger distance, where the ink is applied, counter-intuitively, in a less dense fashion. This approach allows the droplets of ink to be pinned or frozen without the liquid-to-liquid interaction that occurs when ink is applied with less spacing between the ink drops.
In the state of the art, if a native print head having a resolution of 180 dpi is used, and the printer is to apply print at 360 dpi, then two heads are placed next to one another and offset by a 360th of an inch. If a print resolution of 540 dpi is desired, then three print heads are placed together and offset by a 540th of an inch. As a result, the amount of ink applied to the substrate in a pass is quite large.
In one embodiment of the invention, a longer print head is provided. Thus, instead of arranging the print heads next to each other, the print heads are arranged into a longer array, for example they are butted substantially end-to-end. In this way, the density of the ink applied to the surface of the substrate by the print head array stays at, for example 180 dpi, but the print heads are arranged along their lengths rather than next to one another. As a result, the net throughput of the printer is the same, e.g. 540 dpi, because the printer uses the same number of print heads, but the amount of ink that is applied to any given square inch is less on a pass because ink is applied over more of the length of the substrate, with the result that the same net area of the substrate surface is covered.
An embodiment of the invention provides a method and apparatus for UV curable ink jet printing that improves the output quality of a printer by minimizing or eliminating a print artifact referred to as gloss banding or tire tracking. In the state of the art, as more ink is applied in a pass, there is liquid-to-liquid interaction before the substrate goes under a pinning lamp or a curing lamp, and this produces the gloss banding or tire tracking artifact. In the past, dense application of ink has been thought to be a very desirable way of forming an image because it is the most compact, and thus provides the most throughput. An embodiment of the invention uses the same or a similar number of nozzles to achieve a desired throughput, but the nozzles are arranged so that at any given square inch of substrate to which ink is being applied receives a lower amount of ink. To accomplish this, an embodiment of the invention applies ink to the substrate over a larger distance, where the ink is applied, counter-intuitively, in a less dense fashion. This approach allows the droplets of ink to be pinned or frozen without the liquid-to-liquid interaction that occurs when ink is applied with less spacing between the ink drops.
In the state of the art, if a native print head having a resolution of 180 dpi is used, and the printer is to apply print at 360 dpi, then two heads are placed next to one another and offset by a 360th of an inch. If a print resolution of 540 dpi is desired, then three print heads are placed together and offset by a 540th of an inch. As a result, the amount of ink applied to the substrate in a pass is quite large.
In contrast thereto, an embodiment of the invention provides a plurality of print heads, in which each print head comprises a plurality of substantially adjacent ink nozzles positioned within the print head to define an array of nozzles having m nozzle columns with n nozzles per column. The print head nozzle columns define a native vertical resolution for the print head. The print heads are arranged to position the nozzles within each of the print heads for any one color of ink substantially end-to-end with those nozzles of each other print head on a printing system carriage that is formed to hold the print heads in a configuration that jets out ink individually from each of the nozzles onto a substrate during a multi-pass printing application. Thus, in one embodiment of the invention, a longer print head is provided. Thus, instead of arranging the print heads next to each other, the print heads are arranged into a longer array, for example they are effectively butted substantially end-to-end. As a practical matter, what this means is that the heads may be staggered slightly to account for that fact that nozzles within each head are set slightly inwardly from each end of the head. In most cases, actually butting the heads end-to-end would produce a gap between the nozzles of the abutting heads. Thus, in some embodiments, the heads are effectively placed end-to-end in that the nozzles in each head to deposit ink in a continuous fashion along the length of the heads.
Accordingly, the length of the array is the number of nozzle columns×the number of nozzles per column×the resolution of the nozzle columns. For example, consider an array of six heads, each of which may have two nozzle columns at 90 dpi for an array resolution of 180 dpi×508 nozzles per head×6 heads=3024 nozzles at a native resolution of 180 dpi. In another example, consider an array of twelve heads at 90 dpi native resolution at 254 nozzles per head, where the heads are arranged in pairs offset by 1/180.″ This array is identical to the immediately preceding arrangement.
Thus, the density of the ink applied to the surface of the substrate by the print head array stays at, for example 180 dpi, but the print heads are arranged along their lengths rather than next to one another. As a result, the net throughput of the printer is the same, e.g. 540 dpi, because the printer uses the same number of print heads, but the amount of ink that is applied to any given square inch is less on a pass because ink is applied over more of the length of the substrate, with the result that the same net area of the substrate surface is covered.
In the printer of
The carriage 18 holds a group of print heads configured to jet out ink individually onto the substrate during a multi-pass printing application. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the printer shown in
In the state of the art, there are three basic methods of ink lay down or interlacing. The first such method is referred to as enhanced, no smoothing, or two-pass mode. In this mode, each horizontal dot line is printed by two different print head nozzles. On one pass, the odd number pixel or dots are printed, the media is advanced and, on the return pass, the even numbered dots are printed by a different set of nozzles. The major reason for using this method is that a missing nozzle, would leave a full dot line missing as a print defect. This defect can be minimized by leaving a light line rather than a fully missing line. This method is illustrated in
The second method of interlacing is referred to as the ultra or four-pass mode. In this mode, each dot line is printed by four different nozzles. On the first pass, every fourth dot is printed. The media is moved, and every second dot is printed on the return pass, and so on until all the pixel positions are filled on a line. This is graphically illustrated in
The third mode is referred to as heavy smoothing and is shown in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention herein may be used in connection with any of these or other interlacing technique, if desired. Key to the invention is the arrangement of the print heads to cover more of the substrate surface in each pass, where less ink is applied per square inch of substrate, thus reducing the density of the ink applied to the substrate and avoiding the liquid-to-liquid interaction that occurs when ink is applied with less spacing between the ink drops, and that results in such undesirable print artifacts as gloss banding or tire tracking.
As can be seen in
In some embodiments of the invention, the print heads are grouped in the carriage in various configurations. For example, the print heads can be configured in four groups, each having four colored ink print heads placed on a portion of the print carriage that first passes over the substrate, wherein the substrate first encounters the colored ink print heads during transport through the printing system. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other arrangements are within the scope of the invention, for example six groups with four groups of colored ink print heads can be placed on the portion of the print carriage that first passes over the media. Accordingly, the media first encounters the colored ink print heads during its transport through the printing system. The groups of colored print heads can be arranged in color clusters defining a standard color model. For example, the groups can contain colors defining the CMYK color model. Those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that other color models, other arrangements, and other colored inks will equally benefit from the invention.
Key to the invention is the arrangement of the print heads substantially end-to-end, rather than in an offset, side-to-side configuration. While this approach typically requires more passes to print an image, more square inches of the substrate are covered per pass. For purposes of the disclosure herein, this is referred to as an image build. When a print job is started, not all of the nozzles are used because the substrate is not yet positioned beneath the entire print nozzle array. As the printer steps the substrate into the array, a point is reached at which all of the nozzles are used all of the time. The majority of the printing occurs in this fashion, with all of the nozzles in use. At the end of the print job, the substrate is stepped away from the array. As a result, the invention has a relatively small negative effect on throughput when compared to a conventional print head configuration. However, this is only during the first and last few passes. If the printer is operated continuously, then the affect on throughput is very minimal because the step size remains the same for each approach. That is, the substrate is advanced at the same rate and, for multiple sheets, the effect of the gap at the top and bottom of the substrate is further minimized because each sheet of substrate is continuously fed, one after the other, so that the throughput penalty of the invention only occurs at the top of the first sheet and the bottom of the last sheet. For a print job of many sheets, this penalty is negligible.
The invention, in some embodiments, can affect the placement of lamps used by the printer for pinning and curing. In some embodiments, the lamps may be made longer than those used in connection with a conventional print head array because lamps are typically of a greater length than the length of the print head array. The placement of lamps in the direction of motion of the carriage is the same. The lamps in some embodiments may require less energy because the ink is less dense on the substrate, and thus requires less intensity to pin and/or cure. The same amount of total energy is used for the same print job, but it is spread out over a longer array. In some embodiments, pinning is helpful because the invention allows one to use a small amount of energy over the length of the print head array. After the image is completely formed, a final curing step can be performed on the ink. In other embodiments, the cure lamps can cover the full length of, or longer than, the print head array. In some embodiments, the cure lamps are attached to the carriage that carries the print heads, and the length of the lamp is the same or greater than the length of the print heads. In some embodiments, a distinction is made between cure lamps and pinning lamps. In these embodiments, the pinning lamps are preferably the same length or longer than the print head array, and there is an additional cure region after the whole image is formed. Some embodiments use pure post-cure, and do not pin at all (for a discussion of pinning, see U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/218,233, filed Aug. 25, 2011, which application is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference thereto). Thus, a cure is performed after the print is completed. In other embodiments, the low-density laydown uses longer, traditional cure lamps. Other embodiments use variable pinning as well.
The interlacing modes can be similar to the three modes described above. This allows the rate of ink lay down per area to be much smaller than previous implementations. Improvements in throughput are achieved by having more ink jet nozzles extended in the vertical direction. In the printer, this is the carriage depth.
Tests were conducted to illustrate the improvement in the gloss and differential gloss by using a lower resolution inkjet head array. The results of one test (
The second test (
Although the invention is described herein with reference to the preferred embodiment, one skilled in the art will readily appreciate that other applications may be substituted for those set forth herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the invention should only be limited by the Claims included below.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/218,296, filed Aug. 25, 2011, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6145979 | Caiger et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6457823 | Cleary | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6595612 | Brown et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6739716 | Richards | May 2004 | B2 |
6789867 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7152969 | Hintermann | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152970 | Hasebe et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7600867 | Mills et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7837319 | Rodin et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8201909 | Barbour et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20020024558 | Fujita et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030103100 | Vanhooydonck | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20100013878 | Spaulding et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100289852 | Woolfe et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100289860 | Takezawa et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110069128 | Onishi | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0471488 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0518670 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0665114 | Aug 1995 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130250001 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13218296 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 13898331 | US |