Reduced precipitation rate nozzle

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11247219
  • Patent Number
    11,247,219
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 22, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 15, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
A nozzle is provided having a low precipitation rate and uniform fluid distribution to a desired arcuate span of coverage. The nozzle has an inflow port having a shape corresponding to the desired arc of coverage and a size for effecting a low precipitation rate. The nozzle also has a deflector surface with a water distribution profile including ribs for subdividing the fluid into multiple sets of fluid streams. There are at least two fluid streams for distant and close-in irrigation to provide relatively uniform distribution and coverage. The nozzle may be a unitary, one-piece, molded nozzle body including a mounting portion, an inflow port, and a deflector portion.
Description
FIELD

This invention relates generally to irrigation nozzles and, more particularly, to an irrigation nozzle with a relatively low precipitation rate and uniform fluid distribution.


BACKGROUND

Efficient irrigation is a design objective of many different types of irrigation devices. That objective has become increasingly important due to concerns and regulation at the federal, state and local levels of government regarding the efficient usage of water. Over time, irrigation devices have become more efficient at using water in response to these concerns and regulations. However, there is an ever-increasing need for efficiency as demand for water increases.


As typical irrigation sprinkler devices project streams or sprays of water from a central location, there is inherently a variance in the amount of water that is projected to areas around the location of the device. For example, there may be a greater amount of water deposited further from the device than closer to the device. This can be disadvantageous because it means that some of the area to be watered will be over watered and some of the area to be watered will receive the desired about of water or, conversely, some of the area to be watered will receive the desired amount of water and some will receive less than the desired about of water. In other words, the distribution of water from a single device is often not uniform.


Two factors contribute to efficient irrigation: (1) a relatively low precipitation rate to avoid the use of too much water; and (2) relatively uniform water distribution so that different parts of the terrain are not overwatered or underwatered. The precipitation rate generally refers to the amount of water used over time and is frequently measured in inches per hour. It is desirable to minimize the amount of water being distributed in combination with sufficiently and uniformly irrigating the entire terrain.


Some conventional nozzles use a number of components that are molded separately and are then assembled together. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,861 is an example of a fixed arc nozzle having a separately molded nozzle base for mounting the nozzle to a fluid source, base ring, and deflector for directing the fluid outwardly from the nozzle. Other nozzles are complex and have a relatively large number of parts. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 9,776,195 discloses a nozzle that uses a number of inserts and plugs installed within ports. As an alternative, it would be desirable to have a nozzle having a simple one-piece, molded nozzle body that may reduce the costs of manufacture.


Accordingly, a need exists for a nozzle that provides efficient irrigation by combining a relatively low precipitation rate with uniform water distribution. Further, many conventional nozzles include a number of components, such as a nozzle base, nozzle collar, deflector, etc., which are often separately molded and are then assembled to form the nozzle. It would be desirable to reduce the cost and complexity of nozzles by reducing the number of separately molded components. It would be desirable to be able to form a one-piece, molded nozzle body that would avoid the need for separate component molds and the need for assembly after component molding.


Further, it has been found that irrigation may be especially non-uniform at the boundary edges of an irrigation pattern. More specifically, an excessive amount of fluid may be concentrated at these boundary edges, and a nozzle may distribute fluid either too far or not far enough along these boundary edges. Accordingly, there is a need to improve the irrigation uniformity at the boundary edges relative to other portions of the irrigation pattern.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a bottom perspective view of an embodiment of a nozzle embodying features of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a top perspective view of the nozzle of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the nozzle of FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 is an exploded view of the nozzle of FIG. 1;



FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view of the nozzle of FIG. 1 (with the filter removed);



FIG. 6 is a top plan view of the nozzle of FIG. 1;



FIG. 7 is a side elevational view of the nozzle of FIG. 1 (with the filter removed);



FIGS. 8 and 9 are detailed perspective views of some of the ribs on the underside of the deflector portion of the nozzle of FIG. 1;



FIG. 10 is a schematic representation of the port of the nozzle of FIG. 1 showing the geometry of the port;



FIG. 11 is a fluid distribution diagram showing the fluid distribution of a conventional nozzle; and



FIG. 12 is a fluid distribution diagram showing the fluid distribution of the nozzle of FIG. 1.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In one form, the exemplary drawings show a nozzle 100 that improves efficiency of irrigation by combining a relatively low precipitation rate with relatively uniform fluid distribution. The nozzle 100 includes a small inflow port 106 (or central channel) to allow a relatively small volume of water through the nozzle 100, i.e., to provide a low precipitation rate. The spray nozzle 100 further includes a deflector 112 with a profile including rib structures forming different types of flow channels that separate fluid into different streams in order to improve the overall water distribution, i.e., to provide relatively uniform fluid distribution. Many conventional irrigation nozzles have deflectors with a series of similarly shaped radial flutes that distribute one type of fluid spray. In contrast, the deflectors of the preferred embodiments have a series of ribs with structures disposed in the flow paths of the fluid resulting in different streams having different characteristics. The different sprays combine to provide a relatively uniform water distribution pattern.


As described further below, the nozzle 100 preferably includes one or more of the following features to improve uniformity of fluid in the irrigation pattern: (1) vent holes to normalize air pressure behind the water streams emerging from the nozzle 100 to facilitate uniform fluid distribution at the boundary edges of the irrigation pattern; (2) a rear wall offset a certain distance to facilitate uniform fluid distribution at the boundary edges of the irrigation pattern; and (3) a port aperture with a cross-section defining a complex geometry of compound radii to improve distribution uniformity. The vent holes and the rear wall offset help reduce heavy precipitation along the boundary edge of the irrigation pattern and help reduce overthrow beyond the intended throw radius. The geometry of the port aperture helps decrease precipitation at the boundary edges and achieve uniform distribution throughout the irrigation pattern.


One embodiment of a nozzle 100 is shown in FIGS. 1-8. In this form, the nozzle 100 generally comprises a compact unit, preferably made primarily of lightweight molded plastic, which is adapted for convenient thread-on mounting onto the upper end of a stationary or pop-up riser (not shown). The nozzle 100 preferably includes a one-piece nozzle body 102 and a flow throttling screw 104. In operation, fluid under pressure is delivered through the riser to the nozzle body 102. The fluid preferably passes through an inflow port 106 controlled by the throttling screw 104 that regulates the amount of fluid flow through the nozzle body 102. The nozzle 100 also preferably includes a filter 107 to screen out particulate matter upstream of the inflow port 106. Fluid is directed generally upwardly through the inflow port 106, along a generally conical transition surface 108, and then along ribs 110 formed in the underside surface of a deflector 112.


As can be seen, the nozzle body 102 is preferably generally cylindrical in shape. It includes a bottom mounting end 114 forming an inlet 115 and with internal threading 116 for mounting of the nozzle body 102 to corresponding external threading on an end of piping, such as a riser, supplying water. The nozzle body 102 also defines a central bore 118 to receive the flow throttling screw 104 to provide for adjustment of the inflow of water into the nozzle body 102. Threading may be provided at the central bore 118 to cooperate with threading on the screw 104 to enable movement of the screw 104. The nozzle body 102 also preferably includes a top deflecting end defining a distal wall 120 relative to the inlet 115 and defining the underside surface of the deflector 112 for deflecting fluid radially outward through a fixed, predetermined arcuate span. Further, the nozzle body 102 includes a recess 122 defined, in part, by a boundary wall 124 and with the conical transition surface 108 disposed within the recess 122.


As can be seen in FIGS. 1 and 2, for the half-circle nozzle 100, the inflow port 106 generally extends about 180 degrees in order to cover a 180 degree irrigation pattern. The inflow port 106 is preferably disposed in a plate 126 located downstream of the internal threading 116 and is preferably located adjacent the central bore 118 that receives the throttling screw 104. Although in this embodiment the threading is shown as internal threading 116, it should be evident that the threading may be external threading instead. Some risers or fluid source are equipped with internal threading at their upper end for the mounting of nozzles. In this instance, the nozzle may be formed with external threading for mounting to this internal threading of the riser or fluid source.


The cross-section of the inflow port 106 may be modified in different models to match the precipitation rate. In one preferred form, for example, the cross-section of the inflow port 106 may be configured for a maximum throw of 8 feet with a low precipitation rate that is less than 1 inch per hour, preferably about 0.9 inches per hour. The cross-section of the inflow port 106 may be increased for nozzles intended to have a longer maximum throw radius (such as, for example, 15 feet) while maintaining the matched precipitation rate of about 0.9 inches per hour. As should be evident, the dimensions of inflow ports of other models may be configured for different intended throw distances while preferably matching this precipitation rate. In one straightforward example, the cross-section of the port may be in the shape of a regular semi-circle. However, in another form, the cross-section of the port 106 extends 180 degrees but is preferably defined by compound radii, as shown in FIG. 10 and as addressed further below.


Further, as addressed below, the shape of the inflow port 106 may be modified to achieve different fixed arcuate spans. For example, the cross-section of the inflow port may extend 90 degrees for quarter-circle (or 90 degree) irrigation, or two opposing 180 degree inflow ports may be used to achieve close to full circle (or 360 degree) irrigation. Alternatively, two inflow ports (one extending 180 degrees and the other extending 90 degrees) may be used to achieve roughly three-quarter circle (or 270 degree) irrigation, or two inflow ports of approximately the same size may be formed to achieve this three-quarter circle irrigation. Again, these models with different arcuate spans would preferably have matched precipitation rates of about 0.9 inches per hour.


As can be seen in FIGS. 1 and 2, once fluid flows through the inflow port 106, it then flows along the conical transition surface 108 to a water distribution profile on the underside of the deflector 112. The transition surface 108 is intermediate of the port 106 and the profile, which includes a plurality of ribs 110, and guides flow directed through the port 106 to the flutes 140 defined by successive ribs 110. The transition surface 108 is aligned with and expands smoothly outwardly in the direction of the plurality of ribs 110 and reduces energy loss experienced by fluid flowing from the port 106 to the flutes 140. The transition surface 108 is generally conical in shape having a vertex 134 disposed near the port 106 expanding into smoothly curved sides 136 having increasing curvature in the direction of the deflector 112 and terminating in a base 132 near the plurality of ribs 110. For the half-circle nozzle 100, the conical transition surface 108 is preferably in the shape of an inverted half-cone with a generally semi-circular base 132 on the underside of the deflector 112 and a vertex 134 offset slightly from the boundary wall 124. The conical transition surface 108 is preferably curved to smoothly guide upwardly directed fluid radially and outwardly away from the central axis of the nozzle body 102 to the ribbed deflector surface. The portion of the cone near the vertex 134 is preferably inclined closer to vertical with less curvature, and the portion of the cone near the base 132 preferably has greater curvature. Various different forms of curvature may be used for the conical transition surface 108, including catenary and parabolic curvature. Also, as should be evident, the surface 108 need not be precisely conical.


The dimensions of the conical transition surface may be modified in different models to provide different flow characteristics. For example, the vertex may be located at different vertical positions along the boundary wall, the semi-circular base may be chosen with different diameters, and the curved edge surface may be chosen to provide different degrees of curvature. These dimensions are preferably chosen to provide a more abrupt transition for shorter maximum throw radiuses and a gentler transition for longer maximum throw radiuses. For instance, for an 8-foot nozzle (in comparison to the 15-foot nozzle 100), the vertex 134 may be located higher along the boundary wall 124, the semi-circular base 132 may be smaller, and the curved edge surface 136 may have less curvature. Thus, for an 8-foot nozzle, the upwardly directed fluid strikes the underside surface of the deflector 112 more squarely, which dissipates more energy and results in a shorter maximum throw radius than the 15-foot nozzle 100.


Further, as with the inflow port 106, the shape of the conical transition surface 108 may be modified to accommodate different fixed arcuate spans, as addressed further below. For example, the conical transition surface may be in the shape of an inverted quarter conical portion with a vertex and a quarter-circle base for quarter-circle (or 90 degree) irrigation. Alternatively, the nozzle body may include two inverted half-conical portions facing opposite one another to achieve close to full circle (or 360 degree) irrigation. Further, the nozzle body may include one inverted half-conical portion and one inverted quarter-conical portion facing opposite one another for three-quarter circle (or 270 degree) irrigation, or the nozzle body may include two conical portions of approximately the same size for this three-quarter circle irrigation.


As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the deflector 112 is generally semi-cylindrical. The deflector 112 has an underside surface that is contoured to deliver a plurality of fluid streams generally radially outwardly therefrom through a predetermined arcuate span. In the half-circle nozzle 100, the arcuate span is preferably about 180 degrees, although other predetermined arcuate spans are available. As shown in FIGS. 1, 2, 7, and 8, the underside surface of the deflector 112 preferably defines a water distribution profile that includes an array of ribs 110. The ribs 110 subdivide the water into multiple flow channels for a plurality of water streams that are distributed radially outwardly therefrom to surrounding terrain. As addressed further below, the ribs 110 form flow channels that provide different trajectories with different elevations for the water streams. These different trajectories allow water distribution to terrain relatively close to the nozzle 100 and to terrain relatively distant from the nozzle 100, thereby improving uniformity of water distribution.


In view of this deflector configuration, the nozzle 100 shown in FIGS. 1-8 is a multi-stream, multi-trajectory nozzle. As can be seen in FIG. 7, the deflector 112 is contoured to create flow channels for water streams having at least three different types of trajectories: (1) a distant trajectory with a relatively high elevation (A); (2) an intermediate trajectory with an intermediate elevation (B); and (3) a close-in trajectory with a relatively low elevation (C). These three different water trajectories allow coverage of terrain at different distances from the nozzle 100 and thereby provide relatively uniform coverage.


A variety of different rib configurations are possible. In one form, as shown in FIGS. 1, 2, 7, and 8, the deflector 112 includes a plurality of radially-extending ribs 110 that form part of its underside. Flutes 140 for water are formed between adjacent ribs 110 and have rounded bottoms 162 coinciding with the underside of the upper deflector surface 158. The ribs 110 are each configured to divide the fluid flow through the flutes 140 into different channels for different sprays directed to different areas and thereby having different characteristics. A similar rib structure is described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,314,952, which description is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


As the ribs 110 are each generally symmetric about a radially-extending line, only one of the sides of a representative rib 110 will be described with it being understood that the opposite side of that same rib 110 has the same structure. With reference to FIGS. 8 and 9, the rib 110 has a first step 166 forming in part a first micro-ramp and a second step 168 defining in part a second micro-ramp. The first step 166 is generally linear and positioned at an angle closer to perpendicular relative to a central axis of the deflector 112 as compared to the bottom 162 of the upper deflector surface 158, as shown in FIGS. 8 and 9. The second step 168 is segmented, having an inner portion 168a that extends closer to perpendicular relative to the central axis as compared to an outer portion 168b, which has a sharp downward angle.


The geometries of the ribs 110 and the bottom 162 of the of the upper deflector surface 158 cooperate to define a plurality of micro-ramps which divide the discharging water into sprays having differing characteristics. More specifically, the first and second steps 166 and 168 divide the sidewall into four portions having different thicknesses: a first sidewall portion 163 disposed beneath an outward region of the bottom 162 of the upper deflector surface 158; a second sidewall portion 165 disposed beneath the first sidewall portion 163 and at the outer end of rib 110; a third sidewall portion 167 disposed beneath the first sidewall portion and radially inward from the second sidewall portion 167, and a fourth sidewall portion 169 disposed beneath the first and second sidewall portions 165 and 167, as depicted in FIGS. 8 and 9. As addressed further below, these four sidewall portions result in fluid flow along the ribs 110 in multiple water streams that combine to provide relatively uniform fluid distribution.


In this form, the half-circle nozzle 100 preferably includes 15 ribs 110. These ribs 110 produce water streams in three sets of general flow channels having general trajectories for relatively distant, intermediate, and short ranges of coverage. More specifically, and with reference to FIG. 7, there is a distant spray A, a mid-range spray B, and a close-in spray C. However, rather than being distinct trajectories, these secondary and tertiary streams (B and C) are deflected or diffused from the sides of the relatively distant, nominal streams (A). Accordingly, this type of nozzle 100 is a multi-stream, multi-diffuser nozzle. Of course, the number of streams may be modified by changing the number of ribs 110.


The flow channels for the relatively distant streams (A) are formed primarily by the uppermost portion of the flutes 140 between successive ribs 110. More specifically, these streams (A) flow within the uppermost portion of the flute 140 defined by the rounded bottoms 162 at the underside of the upper deflector surface 158 and extending downwardly to the first steps 166. As can be seen in FIGS. 8 and 9, this uppermost portion is generally curved near the base of the flute 140, such as in the shape of an arch. There is one stream (A) between each pair of ribs 110 and between the two edge ribs 110 and the boundary wall 124.


The flow channel for the mid-range spray (B) is defined generally by the side of each rib 110 between the first step 166 and the second step inner portion 168a. More specifically, these streams (B) flow within an intermediate portion of the discharge channel 140 and have a lower general trajectory than the distant streams (A). These mid-range streams (B) may be deflected laterally to some extent by the second step outer portion 168b. There is one stream (B) corresponding to the side of each rib 110.


The flow channels for the close-in streams (C) are formed generally by the lowermost portion of the flute 140 on each side of rib 110. More specifically, these streams (C) flow beneath the second step 168 and along the lowermost portions of the ribs 110. These streams (C) generally have a lower trajectory than the other two streams (A and B) and impact and are directed downwardly by the second step outer portion 168b. The sharply inclined end segment 168b is configured to direct the water spray more downwardly as compared to the spray from the first micro-ramp. There is one stream (C) corresponding to the side of each rib 110.


As addressed above, these three general trajectories are not completely distinct trajectories. The relatively distant water stream (A) has the highest trajectory and elevation, generally does not experience interfering water streams, and therefore is distributed furthest from the nozzle 100. However, the secondary and tertiary streams (B and C) are deflected or diffused from the sides of the ribs 110, have lower general trajectories and elevations, and experience more interfering water streams. As a result, these streams (B and C) fill in the remaining pattern at intermediate and close-in ranges.


The positioning and orientation of the first and second steps 166 and 168 may be modified to change the flow characteristics. It will be understood that the geometries, angles and extent of the micro-ramps can be altered to tailor the resultant combined spray pattern. Further, in some circumstances, it may be preferable to have less than all of the ribs 110 include micro-ramps. For instance, the micro-ramps may be on only one side of each of the ribs 110, may be in alternating patterns, or in some other arrangement.


In the exemplary embodiment of a nozzle 100, the ribs 110 are spaced at about 10 degrees to about 12 degrees apart. The first step 166 is preferably triangular in shape and between about 0.004 and 0.008 inches in width at its outer end from the sidewall of the adjacent portion of the rib 110, such as about 0.006 inches. It preferably has a length of about 0.080 inches and tapers downwardly about 6 degrees from a horizontal plane defined by the top of the nozzle 100. The second step 168 may be between about 0.002 inches in width, an inner portion 168a may be about 0.05 inches in length, and an angle of the inner portion 168a may be about 2 degree relative to a horizontal plane. The angle of the bottom portion 170 of rib 110 may be about 9 degrees downwardly away from a horizontal plane coinciding with the top of the nozzle 100. While these dimensions are representative of the exemplary embodiment, they are not to be limiting, as different objectives can require variations in these dimensions, the addition or subtraction of the steps and/or micro-ramps, and other changes to the geometry to tailor the resultant spray pattern to a given objective.


Other rib features and configurations are described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,314,952, which description is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The rib features and configurations disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,314,952 may be incorporated into the nozzle embodiments disclosed in this application. More specifically, the deflector surface and water distribution profile including rib features of that application may be used in conjunction with the inflow ports, conical transition surfaces, and other parts of the nozzle embodiments disclosed above.


As can be seen from FIGS. 6, 8, and 9, the nozzle 100 also includes features to increase the uniformity of distribution at the boundary edges, i.e., at each 180 degree boundary edge. The nozzle 100 includes vent holes 172 to normalize air pressure behind the water streams emerging from the nozzle 100. These vent holes 172 preferably extend vertically through the distal wall 120. They are generally disposed at two positions at each arcuate end of the deflector, these two positions corresponding to each boundary flute 174 defining each of the two boundary edges of the irrigation pattern. In this preferred form, there are six vent holes 172 disposed about each boundary flute 174. More specifically, as can be seen, in this preferred form, two of the vent holes 172A are disposed behind the boundary flute 174 (adjacent the rear wall 176), two of the vent holes 172B are disposed above the boundary flute 174 (vertically above the water stream exiting this flute 174), and vent holes 172C are disposed in front of the boundary flute 174 (vertically above the rib 110 and flute 140 adjacent the boundary flute 174). It is believed that the positioning of the two vent holes 172A between streams exiting the boundary flutes 174 and the rear wall 176 provide air flow that help produce crisp boundary edges, regardless of the pressure of the exiting water streams. The vent hole pattern may only include one or more holes 172A. Further, as can be seen, the boundary flute 174 is not the same size as the other flutes 140 but is instead about half of the diameter of the other flutes 140.


It is believed that, without vent holes 172A, fluid distributed at the boundary edges will tend to cling to the boundary wall 124 and/or the rear wall 176. In other words, when this fluid exits at the boundary edges, it tends to wrap around the corners and adhere to one or both walls 124, 176. When fluid is exiting the vent holes 172A, air is generally drawn downward into the space between the exiting water stream and the rear wall 176. By normalizing the air pressure behind the exiting water stream, a more uniform irrigation pattern is formed. This result is generally true regardless of the fluid pressure, fluid flow, and fluid velocity. It is believed that, without vent holes 172A, low flow and low velocity conditions may especially result in non-uniform and uneven irrigation patterns.


As should be understood, the number and arrangement of vent holes 172 may be modified. It is generally believed that several vent holes 172 may be desirable for redundancy to make the vent holes 172 more grit resistant. Further, the vent holes 172 may define any of various cross-sectional shapes, including circular, oval, rectangular, triangular, etc. It is believed that the two vent holes 172A closest to the rear wall 176 may provide the most benefit, and they may prevent impact with and/or clinging to the rear wall 176. It is also believed that some or all of the vent holes 172 help prevent impact of the exiting water streams with the distal wall 120.


As mentioned above, and as can be seen in FIGS. 1, 2, 7, 8, and 9, the two boundary flutes 174 are half flutes, i.e., they each have about half of the cross-section of the other flutes of the deflector 112. It is believed that boundary flutes 174 of the same size as the other flutes results in too much water at the boundary edges of the irrigation pattern, and it is believed that the water streams at the boundary edges tends to draw in more water. These two truncated flutes 174 therefore reduce the amount of water at the boundary edges of the pattern.


Further, in one form, the rear wall 176 may be preferably offset from the boundary wall 124 by a minimum distance of about 0.010 to 0.015 inches. This minimum offset helps limit the water streams deflecting off of the rear wall 176 and reduce the amount of friction resulting from the rear wall 176. As stated, such water streams impacting or adhering to the rear wall tend to contribute to heavy precipitation along the boundary edges of the irrigation pattern and/or contribute to overthrow beyond the intended throw radius. It is believed that the offset must have a minimum distance to provide a certain amount of separation to allow air to flow into the space between the exiting water stream and the rear wall 176. However, too much offset may lead to a decrease in performance because it may lead to air flow in the wrong direction, i.e., not primarily downward but also including some lateral components.


In addition, the cross-section of the port 106 is preferably shaped in a certain manner to increase the uniformity of the entire irrigation pattern. More specifically, the port 106 is preferably formed of a complex geometry of arc segments with different/compound radii to improve distribution uniformity. In other words, the port 106 extends about 180 degrees but is not precisely semi-circular in cross-section. The lateral edges (the left and right sides) of the port 106 are preferably symmetrical, and each lateral edge preferably defines a shorter leg/radius relative to a longer leg/radius relative to the forward edge. As stated above, fluid tends to accumulate and overthrow at the boundary edges, resulting in a less uniform pattern. By adjusting the shape of the port 106 in this manner, less fluid is directed to the boundary edges of the irrigation pattern and more fluid is directed to the forward portion of the irrigation pattern. In one straightforward example, the port 106 may be formed of arc segments with two distinct radii: a shorter radius to the lateral edges and a longer radius to the forward edge.


An exemplary form of a port 106 with more compound radii, e.g., four compound radii, is shown in FIG. 10. As can be seen, in this form, the lateral edge points 178 of the port 106 define sides 179 having shorter legs than the center 180 of the forward edge 181. More specifically, in this particular example, the shorter legs are preferably about 0.058 inches from the midpoint 182 of the base 184, and the longer leg to the center 180 of the forward edge 181 is about 0.063 inches (although it should be understood that other dimensions are possible). In this form, the cross-sectional shape of the port 106 includes a base 184 with a midpoint 182, two lateral edge points 178 disposed at equal distances from the midpoint 182, and a forward edge 181 spaced from the midpoint 182 and connecting the two lateral edge points 178. Further, in this form, the distance from the midpoint 182 to each lateral edge point 178 is less than the distance from the midpoint 182 to the center 180 of the forward edge 181.


Additional radii have been added to fine tune fluid distribution within the irrigation pattern. More specifically, as can be seen, in this particular form, the cross-section of the port 106 is defined by arcuate segments having four different radiuses/curvatures. In this particular example, starting from one lateral edge point 178, the first arcuate segment 186 preferably has a radius of about 0.045 inches and extends about 25 degrees; the second arcuate segment 188 preferably has a radius of about 0.713 inches and also extends about 25 degrees; the third arcuate segment 190 has a radius of about 0.040 inches and extends about 18 degrees; and the fourth arcuate segment 192 has a radius of about 0.072 inches and extends about 22 degrees. As can be seen, in this form, the port 106 generally has a bulging forward portion so as to fill in forward portions of the irrigation pattern, i.e., the port 106 is oblong in cross-sectional shape in the forward direction. The dimensions and shape of the port 106 may be scaled and adjusted, as desired, to fill in various sizes and shapes of irrigation patterns.


In this form, the cross-section of the port 106 is symmetrical about the line from the midpoint 182 to the center 180 of the forward edge 181. In addition, in this form, the cross-section of the port 106 is preferably offset slightly from the boundary wall 124. In other words, the base 184 of the port 106 is spaced slightly from the boundary wall 124, and in one form, it may be spaced about 0.002 inches from the boundary wall 124.


As should be understood, other arrangements of the number, curvature, and extent of arcuate segments are possible. For example, and without limitation, there may be three, five, or more arcuate segments with any of various arcuate curvatures and that extend any of various arcuate lengths. It is generally contemplated that at least two arcuate segments having different radii are used. By adjusting the number and arrangement of arcuate segments, fluid distribution within the irrigation pattern may be adjusted in a desired manner and the uniformity of fluid distribution in the irrigation pattern may be correspondingly adjusted. The use of compound radii therefore provides flexibility in adjusting fluid distribution within the irrigation pattern. The dimensions and shape of these arcuate segments may be scaled and adjusted, as desired, to fill in various sizes and shapes of irrigation patterns.


An optional feature of the nozzle 100 is a pinch angle defined by the boundary wall 124 at the deflector 112. More specifically, this pinch angle is preferably formed at the top of the boundary wall 124 and preferably defines one side of each boundary flute 174. It is oriented such that the boundary wall 124 extends in a direction away from the rear wall 176. In other words, as shown in FIG. 9, the top portion 124A of the boundary wall 124 preferably defines an inwardly inclined angle of about six degrees (or preferably within the range of two to twelve degrees) with respect to the remainder of the boundary wall 124. It is believed that this pinch angle helps limit the boundary water stream from impacting or adhering to the rear wall 176, reduce precipitation along the boundary edges of the irrigation pattern, and/or limit overthrow beyond the intended throw radius. Further, it is believed that different pinch angles may be desirable for different arcuate spans, e.g., 90 degrees, to fine tune the edges, given lower or higher flow conditions.


The features described above help improve the uniform distribution of fluid, especially at the boundary edges of the irrigation pattern. FIG. 11 shows an example of the fluid distribution of a conventional nozzle with heavy precipitation and overthrow along the boundary edges of the irrigation pattern. As seen from above, fluid distribution appears relatively heavy along the boundary edges (shown by the dark portions) and appears to overthrow these boundary edges (extending beyond points 194). FIG. 12 shows an example of the fluid distribution of nozzle 100. Fluid distribution is more uniform within the irrigation pattern, and there is little (if any) overthrow at the boundary edges (overthrow beyond points 194).


Several features have been described above to facilitate the uniform fluid distribution and improve fluid distribution at the boundary edges, including vent holes, rear wall offset, port with compound radii, and a pinch angle. It is contemplated that various embodiments of nozzles may include one or more of these features, either in combination or alone. It should therefore be understood that this disclosure does not require the inclusion of any one or more of these features. In certain circumstances, and depending on the nature of the irrigation pattern and other requirements, it may be desirable to exclude one or more features from an embodiment.


Further, the shape of the deflector may be modified to accommodate different fixed arcuate spans, i.e., 90, 270, and 360 degrees. For example, the deflector may include ribs disposed within 90 degrees for quarter-circle irrigation. Additionally, the nozzle body may include two 180 degree deflector surfaces facing opposite from one another to achieve close to full circle (or 360 degree) irrigation. The nozzle body may also include a 90 degree deflector surface combined with a 180 degree deflector surface to achieve 270 degree irrigation. Alternatively, the nozzle body might include two deflector surfaces of approximately the same size to achieve this three-quarter circle irrigation. For these modified embodiments, it may be preferable to have edge flutes to provide a more distant trajectory for water streams at the edges of the pattern.


The nozzle 100 also preferably includes a flow throttling screw 104. The flow throttling screw 104 extends through the central bore 118 of the nozzle body 102. The flow throttling screw 104 is manually adjusted to throttle the flow of water through the nozzle 100. The throttling screw 104 includes a head 148, is seated in the central bore 118 and may be adjusted through the use of a hand tool. The opposite end 150 of the screw 104 is in proximity to the inlet 115 protected from debris by a filter (not shown). Rotation of the head 148 results in translation of the opposite end 150 for regulation of water inflow into the nozzle 100. The screw 104 may be rotated in one direction to decrease the inflow of water into the nozzle 100, and in the other to increase the inflow of water into the nozzle 100. In one preferred form, the screw 104 may shut off flow by engaging a seat of the filter. As should be evident, any of various types of screws may be used to regulate fluid flow.


In operation, when fluid is supplied to the nozzle 100, it flows upwardly through the filter and then upwardly through the inflow port 106. Next, fluid flows upwardly along the conical transition surface 108, which guides the fluid to the ribs 110 of the deflector 112. The fluid is then separated into multiple streams, flows along the rib structures and is distributed outwardly from the nozzle 100 along these flow channels with different trajectories to improve uniformity of distribution. A user regulates the maximum throw radius by rotating the flow throttling screw 104 clockwise or counterclockwise.


Although the nozzle 100 distributes fluid in a fixed 180 degree arc, i.e., nozzle 100 is a half-circle nozzle, the nozzle may be easily manufactured to cover other predetermined water distribution arcs. Figures showing nozzles with other fixed distribution arcs are easily configured. These other nozzles may be formed by matching the arcuate size of the inflow port with the arc defined by the boundary walls (and with ribs extending therebetween). Further, although the nozzle 100 addressed above includes a one-piece, unitary nozzle body, other embodiments may have a nozzle body that includes several components to define the nozzle body. Various embodiments are described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,314,952, and the patent disclosure is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


It will be understood that various changes in the details, materials, and arrangements of parts and components which have been herein described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of the nozzle may be made by those skilled in the art within the principle and scope of the nozzle and the flow control device as expressed in the appended claims. Furthermore, while various features have been described with regard to a particular embodiment or a particular approach, it will be appreciated that features described for one embodiment also may be incorporated with the other described embodiments.

Claims
  • 1. A nozzle comprising: an inlet having a predetermined cross-section and configured to receive fluid from a fluid source;a deflector defining a plurality of flutes arranged in a predetermined arcuate span, the plurality of flutes contoured to deliver fluid radially outwardly from the nozzle in an irrigation pattern corresponding to the predetermined arcuate span;the plurality of flutes including a first boundary flute and a second boundary flute disposed at first and second ends of the deflector and distributing fluid to two boundary edges of the irrigation pattern; anda plate spaced downstream of the inlet and upstream of the deflector, the plate defining a port therethrough, the port having a cross-section area less than an inlet cross-section area and having a cross-sectional shape corresponding to a shape of the predetermined arcuate span;a boundary wall extending between the plate and the deflector and defining the first and second boundary edges of the irrigation pattern;wherein the cross-sectional shape of the port is oblong, the port having a rear edge that is linear and parallel to the boundary wall and a forward edge protruding from the rear edge with at least two arc segments of different radii of curvature.
  • 2. The nozzle of claim 1, wherein the cross-sectional shape of the port comprises a base with a midpoint, two lateral edge points disposed at equal distances from the midpoint, and a forward edge spaced from the midpoint and connecting the two lateral edge points.
  • 3. The nozzle of claim 2, wherein a first distance from the midpoint to each lateral edge point is less than a second distance from the midpoint to the furthest point on the forward edge from the midpoint.
  • 4. The nozzle of claim 1, wherein the oblong port bulges in a forward direction from the rear edge to the forward edge and not in a lateral direction.
  • 5. The nozzle of claim 1, wherein the oblong port is not indented at any portion of the port.
  • 6. The nozzle of claim 1, wherein the oblong port does not define a C-shaped cross-section.
  • 7. The nozzle of claim 1, wherein a maximum dimension of the oblong port extends from a midpoint of the rear edge to a midpoint of the forward edge.
  • 8. The nozzle of claim 1, wherein the rear edge comprises two lateral edge points and a midpoint, the oblong port defines varying increasing lengths from the rear edge to the forward edge as one proceeds from each lateral edge point to the midpoint, the lengths not all increasing in a linear manner as one proceeds from each lateral edge point to the midpoint.
  • 9. The nozzle of claim 1, wherein the oblong port is defined by arc segments having four compound radii.
US Referenced Citations (425)
Number Name Date Kind
201009 Hastings Mar 1878 A
458607 Weiss Sep 1891 A
691758 Gay Jan 1902 A
949520 Choate Feb 1910 A
1432386 Ctjkwey Oct 1922 A
1523609 Roach Jan 1925 A
1639162 Brooks Aug 1927 A
1764570 Lohman Jun 1930 A
1805782 Munz May 1931 A
2075589 Munz Mar 1937 A
2125863 Arbogast Aug 1938 A
2125978 Arbogast Aug 1938 A
2128552 Rader Aug 1938 A
2130810 Munz Sep 1938 A
2325280 Scherrer Jul 1943 A
2338273 Wilkins Jan 1944 A
2348776 Bentley May 1944 A
2634163 Double Apr 1953 A
2723879 Martin Nov 1955 A
2785013 Stearns Mar 1957 A
2864652 O'Brien Dec 1958 A
2875783 Schippers Mar 1959 A
2914257 Wiant Nov 1959 A
2935266 Coleondro May 1960 A
2990123 Hyde Jun 1961 A
2990128 Knutsen Jun 1961 A
3029030 Dey, Sr. Apr 1962 A
3109591 Moen Nov 1963 A
3239149 Lindberg, Jr. Mar 1966 A
3365137 Corsette Jan 1968 A
3380659 Seablom Apr 1968 A
3716192 Hunter Feb 1973 A
3752403 Van Diest Aug 1973 A
3815831 Jooste Jun 1974 A
3940066 Hunter Feb 1976 A
3948285 Flynn Apr 1976 A
3955764 Phaup May 1976 A
4026471 Hunter May 1977 A
4119275 Hunter Oct 1978 A
4131234 Pescetto Dec 1978 A
4168033 Bernuth Sep 1979 A
4189099 Bruninga Feb 1980 A
4198000 Hunter Apr 1980 A
4253608 Hunter Mar 1981 A
4272024 Kah Jun 1981 A
4316579 Ray Feb 1982 A
4353506 Hayes Oct 1982 A
4353507 Kah Oct 1982 A
4398666 Hunter Aug 1983 A
4401273 Olson Aug 1983 A
4417691 Lockwood Nov 1983 A
4456181 Burnham Jun 1984 A
4471908 Hunter Sep 1984 A
4479611 Galvis Oct 1984 A
4501391 Hunter Feb 1985 A
4566632 Sesser Jan 1986 A
4568024 Hunter Feb 1986 A
4579284 Arnold Apr 1986 A
4579285 Hunter Apr 1986 A
4609146 Walto Sep 1986 A
4618100 White Oct 1986 A
4624412 Hunter Nov 1986 A
4625917 Torney Dec 1986 A
RE32386 Hunter Mar 1987 E
4660766 Nelson Apr 1987 A
4669663 Meyer Jun 1987 A
4676438 Sesser Jun 1987 A
4681260 Cochran Jul 1987 A
4681263 Cockman Jul 1987 A
4682732 Walto Jul 1987 A
4699321 Bivens Oct 1987 A
4708291 Grundy Nov 1987 A
4718605 Hunter Jan 1988 A
4720045 Meyer Jan 1988 A
4739394 Oda Apr 1988 A
4739934 Gewelber Apr 1988 A
D296464 Marmol Jun 1988 S
4752031 Merrick Jun 1988 A
4760958 Greenberg Aug 1988 A
4763838 Holcomb Aug 1988 A
4784325 Walker Nov 1988 A
4796809 Hunter Jan 1989 A
4796811 Davisson Jan 1989 A
4815662 Hunter Mar 1989 A
4834289 Hunter May 1989 A
4836449 Hunter Jun 1989 A
4836450 Hunter Jun 1989 A
4840312 Tyler Jun 1989 A
4842201 Hunter Jun 1989 A
4867378 Kah Sep 1989 A
4889287 Hemsley Dec 1989 A
4898332 Hunter Feb 1990 A
4901924 Kah Feb 1990 A
4932590 Hunter Jun 1990 A
4944456 Zakai Jul 1990 A
4948052 Hunter Aug 1990 A
4955542 Kah Sep 1990 A
4961534 Tyler Oct 1990 A
4967961 Hunter Nov 1990 A
4971250 Hunter Nov 1990 A
D312865 Davisson Dec 1990 S
4986474 Schisler Jan 1991 A
5031840 Grundy Jul 1991 A
5050800 Lamar Sep 1991 A
5052621 Katzer Oct 1991 A
5058806 Rupar Oct 1991 A
5078321 Davis Jan 1992 A
5083709 Iwanowski Jan 1992 A
RE33823 Nelson Feb 1992 E
5086977 Kah Feb 1992 A
5090619 Barthold Feb 1992 A
5098021 Kah Mar 1992 A
5104045 Kah Apr 1992 A
5123597 Bendall Jun 1992 A
5141024 Hicks Aug 1992 A
5148990 Kah Sep 1992 A
5148991 Kah Sep 1992 A
5152458 Curtis Oct 1992 A
5158232 Tyler Oct 1992 A
5174327 Truax Dec 1992 A
5174501 Hadar Dec 1992 A
5199646 Kah Apr 1993 A
5205491 Hadar Apr 1993 A
5224653 Nelson Jul 1993 A
5226599 Lindermeir Jul 1993 A
5226602 Cochran Jul 1993 A
5234169 McKenzie Aug 1993 A
5240182 Lemme Aug 1993 A
5240184 Lawson Aug 1993 A
5267689 Forer Dec 1993 A
5288022 Sesser Feb 1994 A
5299742 Han Apr 1994 A
5322223 Hadar Jun 1994 A
5335857 Hagon Aug 1994 A
5360167 Grundy Nov 1994 A
5370311 Chen Dec 1994 A
5372307 Sesser Dec 1994 A
5375768 Clark Dec 1994 A
5398872 Joubran Mar 1995 A
5417370 Kah May 1995 A
5423486 Hunter Jun 1995 A
5435490 Machut Jul 1995 A
5439174 Sweet Aug 1995 A
RE35037 Kah Sep 1995 E
5456411 Scott Oct 1995 A
5503139 McMahon Apr 1996 A
5526982 McKenzie Jun 1996 A
5544814 Spenser Aug 1996 A
5556036 Chase Sep 1996 A
5588594 Kah Dec 1996 A
5588595 Sweet Dec 1996 A
5598977 Lemme Feb 1997 A
5611488 Frolich Mar 1997 A
5620141 Chiang Apr 1997 A
5640983 Sherman Jun 1997 A
5642861 Ogi Jul 1997 A
5653390 Kah Aug 1997 A
5662545 Zimmerman Sep 1997 A
5671885 Davisson Sep 1997 A
5671886 Sesser Sep 1997 A
5676315 Han Oct 1997 A
D388502 Kah Dec 1997 S
5695123 Van Le Dec 1997 A
5699962 Scott Dec 1997 A
5711486 Clark Jan 1998 A
5718381 Katzer Feb 1998 A
5720435 Hunter Feb 1998 A
5722593 McKenzie Mar 1998 A
5758827 Van Le Jun 1998 A
5762270 Kearby Jun 1998 A
5765757 Bendall Jun 1998 A
5765760 Kuo Jun 1998 A
5769322 Smith Jun 1998 A
5785248 Staylor Jul 1998 A
5820029 Marans Oct 1998 A
5823439 Hunter Oct 1998 A
5823440 Clark Oct 1998 A
5826797 Kah Oct 1998 A
5845849 Mitzlaff Dec 1998 A
5875969 Grundy Mar 1999 A
5918812 Beutler Jul 1999 A
5927607 Scott Jul 1999 A
5971297 Sesser Oct 1999 A
5988523 Scott Nov 1999 A
5992760 Kearby Nov 1999 A
6007001 Hilton Dec 1999 A
6019295 McKenzie Feb 2000 A
6029907 McKenzie Feb 2000 A
6042021 Clark Mar 2000 A
6050502 Clark Apr 2000 A
6076744 O'Brien Jun 2000 A
6076747 Ming-Yuan Jun 2000 A
6085995 Kah Jul 2000 A
6102308 Steingass Aug 2000 A
6109545 Kah Aug 2000 A
6138924 Hunter Oct 2000 A
6145758 Ogi Nov 2000 A
6155493 Kearby Dec 2000 A
6158675 Ogi Dec 2000 A
6182909 Kah Feb 2001 B1
6186413 Lawson Feb 2001 B1
6223999 Lemelshtrich May 2001 B1
6227455 Scott May 2001 B1
6230988 Chao May 2001 B1
6230989 Haverstraw May 2001 B1
6237862 Kah May 2001 B1
6241158 Clark Jun 2001 B1
6244521 Sesser Jun 2001 B1
6264117 Roman Jul 2001 B1
6286767 Hui-Chen Sep 2001 B1
6332581 Chin Dec 2001 B1
6336597 Kah Jan 2002 B1
6341733 Sweet Jan 2002 B1
6345541 Hendey Feb 2002 B1
6367708 Olson Apr 2002 B1
D458342 Johnson Jun 2002 S
6443372 Hsu Sep 2002 B1
6454186 Haverstraw Sep 2002 B2
6457656 Scott Oct 2002 B1
6464151 Cordua Oct 2002 B1
6478237 Kearby Nov 2002 B2
6488218 Townsend Dec 2002 B1
6491235 Scott Dec 2002 B1
6494384 Meyer Dec 2002 B1
6499672 Sesser Dec 2002 B1
6530531 Butler Mar 2003 B2
6588680 Cameron Jul 2003 B2
6601781 Kah Aug 2003 B2
6607147 Schneider Aug 2003 B2
6622940 Huang Sep 2003 B2
6637672 Cordua Oct 2003 B2
6651904 Roman Nov 2003 B2
6651905 Sesser Nov 2003 B2
6688539 Vander Griend Feb 2004 B2
6695223 Beutler Feb 2004 B2
6715699 Greenberg Apr 2004 B1
6719218 Cool Apr 2004 B2
6732952 Kah May 2004 B2
6736332 Sesser May 2004 B2
6736336 Wong May 2004 B2
6737332 Fuselier May 2004 B1
6769633 Huang Aug 2004 B1
6811098 Drechsel Nov 2004 B2
6814304 Onofrio Nov 2004 B2
6814305 Townsend Nov 2004 B2
6817543 Clark Nov 2004 B2
6820825 Wang Nov 2004 B1
6827291 Townsend Dec 2004 B2
6834816 Kah, Jr. Dec 2004 B2
6840460 Clark Jan 2005 B2
6848632 Clark Feb 2005 B2
6854664 Smith Feb 2005 B2
6869026 McKenzie Mar 2005 B2
6871795 Anuskiewicz Mar 2005 B2
6880768 Lau Apr 2005 B2
6883727 De Los Santos Apr 2005 B2
6921030 Renquist Jul 2005 B2
6932279 Burcham Aug 2005 B2
6942164 Walker Sep 2005 B2
6945471 McKenzie Sep 2005 B2
6957782 Clark Oct 2005 B2
6997393 Angold Feb 2006 B1
7017831 Santiago Mar 2006 B2
7017837 Taketomi Mar 2006 B2
7028920 Hekman Apr 2006 B2
7028927 Mermet Apr 2006 B2
7032836 Sesser Apr 2006 B2
7032844 Cordua Apr 2006 B2
7040553 Clark May 2006 B2
7044403 Kah May 2006 B2
7070122 Burcham Jul 2006 B2
7090146 Ericksen Aug 2006 B1
7100842 Meyer Sep 2006 B2
7104472 Renquist Sep 2006 B2
7108204 Johnson Sep 2006 B2
7111795 Thong Sep 2006 B2
7143957 Nelson Dec 2006 B2
7143962 Kah, Jr. Dec 2006 B2
7152814 Schapper Dec 2006 B1
7156322 Heitzman Jan 2007 B1
7159795 Sesser Jan 2007 B2
7168634 Onofrio Jan 2007 B2
7232081 Kah Jun 2007 B2
7234651 Mousavi Jun 2007 B2
7240860 Griend Jul 2007 B2
7287710 Nelson Oct 2007 B1
7287711 Crooks Oct 2007 B2
7293721 Roberts Nov 2007 B2
7303147 Danner Dec 2007 B1
7303153 Han Dec 2007 B2
7322533 Grizzle Jan 2008 B2
7337988 McCormick Mar 2008 B2
7389942 Kenyon Jun 2008 B2
RE40440 Sesser Jul 2008 E
7392956 McKenzie Jul 2008 B2
7429005 Schapper Sep 2008 B2
7478526 McAfee Jan 2009 B2
7487924 Johnson Feb 2009 B2
7533833 Wang May 2009 B2
7562833 Perkins Jul 2009 B2
7581687 Feith Sep 2009 B2
7584906 Lev Sep 2009 B2
7597273 McAfee Oct 2009 B2
7597276 Hawkins Oct 2009 B2
7607588 Nobili Oct 2009 B2
7611077 Sesser Nov 2009 B2
7621467 Garcia Nov 2009 B1
7654474 Cordua Feb 2010 B2
7686235 Roberts Mar 2010 B2
7686236 Alexander Mar 2010 B2
7703706 Walker Apr 2010 B2
RE41302 Drechsel May 2010 E
D615152 Kah May 2010 S
7766259 Feith Aug 2010 B2
7770821 Pinch Aug 2010 B2
7780093 Johnson Aug 2010 B2
D628272 Kah Nov 2010 S
7828229 Kah Nov 2010 B2
7850094 Richmond Dec 2010 B2
7861948 Crooks Jan 2011 B1
D636459 Kah Apr 2011 S
7926746 Melton Apr 2011 B2
7971804 Roberts Jul 2011 B2
RE42596 Sesser Aug 2011 E
8006919 Renquist Aug 2011 B2
8047456 Kah Nov 2011 B2
8056829 Gregory Nov 2011 B2
8074877 Mullen Dec 2011 B2
8074897 Hunnicutt Dec 2011 B2
8205811 Cordua Jun 2012 B2
8272583 Hunnicutt Sep 2012 B2
8282022 Porter Oct 2012 B2
8328112 Johnson Dec 2012 B2
8336788 Perkins Dec 2012 B2
8651400 Walker Feb 2014 B2
8672242 Hunnicutt Mar 2014 B2
8695900 Hunnicutt Apr 2014 B2
8783582 Robertson Jul 2014 B2
8785382 Kilpatrick Jul 2014 B2
8789768 Hunnicutt Jul 2014 B2
8925837 Walker Jan 2015 B2
9079202 Walker Jul 2015 B2
9174227 Robertson Nov 2015 B2
9314952 Walker Apr 2016 B2
9776195 Russell Oct 2017 B2
20010023901 Haverstraw Sep 2001 A1
20020070289 Hsu Jun 2002 A1
20020130202 Kah Sep 2002 A1
20020153434 Cordua Oct 2002 A1
20030006304 Cool Jan 2003 A1
20030015606 Cordua Jan 2003 A1
20030042327 Beutler Mar 2003 A1
20030071140 Roman Apr 2003 A1
20030075620 Kah, Jr. Apr 2003 A1
20040108391 Onofrio Jun 2004 A1
20040124261 Griend Jul 2004 A1
20050006501 Englefield Jan 2005 A1
20050161534 Kah Jul 2005 A1
20050194464 Bruninga Sep 2005 A1
20050194479 Curtis Sep 2005 A1
20060038046 Curtis Feb 2006 A1
20060086832 Roberts Apr 2006 A1
20060086833 Roberts Apr 2006 A1
20060108445 Pinch May 2006 A1
20060144968 Lev Jul 2006 A1
20060237198 Crampton Oct 2006 A1
20060273202 Su Dec 2006 A1
20060281375 Jordan Dec 2006 A1
20070012800 McAfee Jan 2007 A1
20070034711 Kah Feb 2007 A1
20070034712 Kah Feb 2007 A1
20070181711 Sesser Aug 2007 A1
20070235565 Kah Oct 2007 A1
20070246567 Roberts Oct 2007 A1
20080169363 Walker Jul 2008 A1
20080217427 Wang Sep 2008 A1
20080257982 Kah Oct 2008 A1
20080276391 Jung Nov 2008 A1
20080277499 McAfee Nov 2008 A1
20090008484 Feith Jan 2009 A1
20090014559 Marino Jan 2009 A1
20090072048 Renquist Mar 2009 A1
20090078788 Holmes Mar 2009 A1
20090108099 Porter Apr 2009 A1
20090140076 Cordua Jun 2009 A1
20090173803 Kah Jul 2009 A1
20090173904 Roberts Jul 2009 A1
20090188988 Walker Jul 2009 A1
20090188991 Russell Jul 2009 A1
20090224070 Clark Sep 2009 A1
20100078508 South Apr 2010 A1
20100090024 Hunnicutt Apr 2010 A1
20100090036 Allen Apr 2010 A1
20100108787 Walker May 2010 A1
20100155506 Johnson Jun 2010 A1
20100176217 Richmond Jul 2010 A1
20100257670 Hodel Oct 2010 A1
20100276512 Nies Nov 2010 A1
20100294851 Johnson Nov 2010 A1
20100301135 Hunnicutt Dec 2010 A1
20100301142 Hunnicutt Dec 2010 A1
20110024522 Anuskiewicz Feb 2011 A1
20110024526 Feith Feb 2011 A1
20110024809 Janesick Feb 2011 A1
20110031325 Perkins Feb 2011 A1
20110031332 Sesser Feb 2011 A1
20110036920 Johnson Feb 2011 A1
20110089250 Zhao Apr 2011 A1
20110121097 Walker May 2011 A1
20110147484 Jahan Jun 2011 A1
20110147489 Walker Jun 2011 A1
20110248093 Kim Oct 2011 A1
20110248094 Robertson Oct 2011 A1
20110248097 Kim Oct 2011 A1
20110285126 Jahan Nov 2011 A1
20110309161 Renquist Dec 2011 A1
20120012670 Kah Jan 2012 A1
20120061489 Hunnicutt Mar 2012 A1
20120153051 Kah Jun 2012 A1
20120292403 Hunnicutt Nov 2012 A1
20130334332 Robertson Dec 2013 A1
20130334340 Walker Dec 2013 A1
20140027526 Shadbolt Jan 2014 A1
20140027527 Walker Jan 2014 A1
20140263757 Walker Sep 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (56)
Number Date Country
783999 Jan 2006 AU
2427450 Jun 2004 CA
2794646 Jul 2006 CN
2805823 Aug 2006 CN
1283591 Nov 1968 DE
3335805 Feb 1985 DE
0463742 Jan 1992 EP
0489679 Jun 1992 EP
0518579 Dec 1992 EP
0572747 Dec 1993 EP
0646417 Apr 1995 EP
0724913 Aug 1996 EP
0761312 Mar 1997 EP
0761312 Dec 1997 EP
1016463 Jul 2000 EP
1043077 Oct 2000 EP
1043075 Nov 2000 EP
1173286 Jan 2002 EP
1250958 Oct 2002 EP
1270082 Jan 2003 EP
1289673 Mar 2003 EP
1426112 Jun 2004 EP
1440735 Jul 2004 EP
1452234 Sep 2004 EP
1492626 Jan 2005 EP
1502660 Feb 2005 EP
1508378 Feb 2005 EP
1818104 Aug 2007 EP
1944090 Jul 2008 EP
2251090 Nov 2010 EP
2255884 Dec 2010 EP
1234723 Jun 1971 GB
2330783 May 1999 GB
62588 Nov 1942 SU
1995020988 Aug 1995 WO
1997027951 Aug 1997 WO
9735668 Oct 1997 WO
2000007428 Dec 2000 WO
200131996 May 2001 WO
2001031996 May 2001 WO
200162395 Aug 2001 WO
2001062395 Aug 2001 WO
2002078857 Oct 2002 WO
2002098570 Dec 2002 WO
2003086643 Oct 2003 WO
2004052721 Jun 2004 WO
2005099905 Oct 2005 WO
2005115554 Dec 2005 WO
2005123263 Dec 2005 WO
2006108298 Oct 2006 WO
2007131270 Nov 2007 WO
2008130393 Oct 2008 WO
2009036382 Mar 2009 WO
2010036241 Apr 2010 WO
2010126769 Nov 2010 WO
2011075690 Jun 2011 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210154687 A1 May 2021 US