The present invention relates generally to medical treatment systems and, more particularly, to reduced-pressure, composite manifolds, methods, and systems.
Clinical studies and practice have shown that providing a reduced pressure in proximity to a tissue site augments and accelerates the growth of new tissue at the tissue site. The applications of this phenomenon are numerous, but application of reduced pressure has been particularly successful in treating wounds. This treatment (frequently referred to in the medical community as “negative pressure wound therapy,” “reduced pressure therapy,” or “vacuum therapy”) provides a number of benefits, which may include faster healing and increased formulation of granulation tissue. Typically, reduced pressure is applied to tissue through a porous pad or other manifold device. The porous pad contains cells or pores that are capable of distributing reduced pressure to the tissue and channeling fluids that are drawn from the tissue.
In the course of reduced-pressure treatment, issues with necrotic tissue or other issues at the wound margins may occur. These issues may occur even when the healthcare provider debrides the wound at each wound dressing change.
Problems with existing reduced-pressure systems and methods are addressed by the dressings, systems and methods of the illustrative embodiments described herein.
According to an illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a reduced-pressure treatment system for treating a wound on a patient, includes a composite manifold, a sealing member for coupling to the patient's epidermis and operable to form a fluid seal over the wound, and a reduced-pressure subsystem for providing reduced pressure to the composite manifold. The composite manifold includes a perimeter manifold member for disposing adjacent to a wound edge and having an interior portion, and an inboard manifold member disposed adjacent to the interior portion of the perimeter manifold member. The perimeter manifold member is formed with adequate strength to resist collapse under a compressive force transmitted by the sealing member when under therapeutic reduced pressure.
According to another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a composite manifold for use in a reduced-pressure treatment system includes a perimeter manifold member for disposing adjacent to a wound edge and having an interior portion, and an inboard manifold member disposed adjacent to the interior portion of the perimeter manifold member. The perimeter manifold member is formed with adequate strength to resist collapse under therapeutic reduced pressure.
According to another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a method of manufacturing a composite manifold for use in a reduced-pressure treatment system includes the steps of: forming a perimeter manifold member for disposing adjacent to a wound edge; forming an inboard manifold member; disposing the perimeter manifold member adjacent an interior portion of the perimeter manifold member. The perimeter manifold member is formed with adequate strength to resist collapse under therapeutic reduced pressure.
According to another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a method of treating a wound site on a patient with reduced pressure includes the steps of: disposing a composite manifold adjacent to the wound site; forming a fluid seal over the composite manifold; and fluidly coupling a reduced-pressure source to the composite manifold. The composite manifold includes a perimeter manifold member for disposing adjacent to a wound edge and having an interior portion, and an inboard manifold member disposed adjacent to the interior portion of the perimeter manifold member. The perimeter manifold member is formed with adequate strength to resist collapse under therapeutic reduced pressure.
According to another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a composite manifold for use in a reduced-pressure treatment system includes a perimeter manifold member for disposing proximate a wound edge, an inboard manifold member disposed adjacent to the perimeter manifold member, and wherein the perimeter manifold member is more rigid with respect to compressibility than the inboard manifold member.
Other objects, features, and advantages of the illustrative embodiments will become apparent with reference to the drawings and detailed description that follow.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be obtained by reference to the following Detailed Description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings wherein:
In the following detailed description of the illustrative embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical structural, mechanical, electrical, and chemical changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. To avoid detail not necessary to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments described herein, the description may omit certain information known to those skilled in the art. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the illustrative embodiments are defined only by the appended claims.
Referring now primarily to
The reduced-pressure treatment system 100 includes a composite manifold 108. In addition, the reduced-pressure treatment system 100 may include the sealing member 111 and a reduced-pressure subsystem 113. The composite manifold 108 includes a perimeter manifold member 110 and an inboard manifold member 112.
In one illustrative embodiment, the perimeter manifold member 110 and inboard manifold member 112 are made from a porous and permeable foam or foam-like material and, more particularly, a reticulated, open-cell polyurethane or polyether foam that allows good permeability of wound fluids while under a reduced pressure. One such foam material that has been used is the V.A.C.® GranuFoam® Dressing available from Kinetic Concepts, Inc. (KCI) of San Antonio, Tex. Any material or combination of materials may be used for the manifold material provided that the manifold material is operable to distribute the reduced pressure. The term “manifold” as used herein generally refers to a substance or structure that is provided to assist in applying reduced pressure to, delivering fluids to, or removing fluids from a tissue site. A manifold typically includes a plurality of flow channels or pathways. The plurality of flow channels may be interconnected to improve distribution of fluids provided to and removed from the area of tissue around the manifold. Examples of manifolds may include, without limitation, devices that have structural elements arranged to form flow channels, cellular foam, such as open-cell foam, porous tissue collections, and liquids, gels, and foams that include or cure to include flow channels. The manifold material may also be a combination or layering of materials; for example, a first manifold layer of hydrophilic foam may be disposed adjacent to a second manifold layer of hydrophobic foam to form the composite manifold 108.
The reticulated pores of the GranuFoam® material, that are in the range of about 400 to 600 microns, are helpful in carrying out the manifold function, but again other materials may be used. A material with a higher, or lower, density (smaller pore size) than GranuFoam® material may be desirable in some situations. Among the many possible materials, the following may be used: GranuFoam® material or a Foamex® technical foam (www.foamex.com). In some instances it may be desirable to add ionic silver to the foam in a microbonding process or to add other substances to the material, such as antimicrobial agents. The composite manifold 108 could be a bio-absorbable material or an anisotropic material.
The composite manifold 108 helps to address a situation involving wound edge 109, or tissue edge. Pressure patterns on the tissue at the wound edge 109 can increase tissue morbidity. Often as reduced pressure increases within a manifold, a force is applied on the wound edge 109. This pressure at the wound edge 109 may reduce perfusion at the wound margins.
The perimeter manifold 110 can provide support for the wound edge 109. In one aspect, the perimeter manifold 110 results in a composite manifold 108 that reduces pinching or prolapsing of the wound edge 109. The perimeter manifold member 110 may be formed from a manifold material that is more rigid, i.e., compresses less under pressure, than the inboard manifold member 112. The perimeter manifold member 110 carries a force that otherwise would be supported by the wound margin, or wound edge 109, if not borne by the perimeter manifold member 110. Thus, the use of the perimeter manifold 110 can reduce the amount of pressure that would otherwise be applied at the wound edge 109. The perimeter manifold member 110 helps keep the sealing member 111 from pulling in on the wound edge 109 in a direct fashion when under reduced pressure. In other words, the perimeter manifold member 110 helps transfer the inward force created by the sealing member 111 onto the composite manifold 108 and lowers the force on the wound edge 109. This transfer is believed to help increase perfusion at the wound edge 109.
The perimeter manifold member 110 is designed not to collapse substantially under reduced pressure in a therapy range and typically is more rigid than the inboard manifold member 112. The rigidity of perimeter manifold member 110 as compared to the inboard manifold member 112 may be accomplished in a number of ways and described in a number of ways.
One may consider the bulk modulus (K) of the perimeter manifold member 110 and the inboard manifold member 112. The bulk modulus (K) of a substance generally measures the substance's resistance to uniform compression. The bulk modulus is often defined as the pressure increase needed to effect a given relative decrease in volume. The bulk modulus K can be more formally defined by the equation: K=∂p/∂V, where p is pressure, V is volume, and ∂p/∂V denotes the partial derivative of pressure with respect to volume. Thus, in general terms, the more rigid a material is, the larger its bulk modulus. In the illustrative embodiment, the perimeter manifold member 110 may be formed from a first manifold material having a first bulk modulus K1 and the inboard manifold member 112 may be formed from a second manifold material having a second bulk modulus K2. Since in this embodiment the perimeter manifold member 110 is more rigid than the inboard manifold member 112, it follows that K1>K2.
One may also consider the relative densities, ρ, of the perimeter manifold member 110 and inboard manifold member 112. The density (ρ) of a body is a measure of how tightly the matter within the body is packed together and is given by the ratio of its mass (m) to its volume (V). The composite manifold 108 may be formed with the perimeter manifold member 110 formed from a first manifold material having a first density, ρ1, and the inboard manifold member 112 formed from a second manifold material having a second density, ρ2, and where ρ1>ρ2. With ρ1>ρ2 the perimeter manifold 110 may have more rigidity than the inboard manifold 112. As one illustrative, non-limiting example, the inboard manifold member 112 could be formed from a GranuFoam® material having 65 pores per linear inch and the perimeter manifold member 110 could be formed from a GranuFoam® material having about 115 pores per linear inch.
In addition to forming the perimeter manifold member 110 and inboard manifold member 112 from the same material but with greater density (ρ) in the perimeter manifold member 110, the perimeter manifold member 110 and inboard manifold member 112 may be formed of different materials with the perimeter manifold member 110 selected to have more rigidity due to a higher density or a greater bulk modulus. In addition or as an alternative, as shown in
Alternatively or in addition, a manifold material may be sprayed with bio-friendly stiffening substance to cause a perimeter portion to be more stiff than an inboard portion while maintaining the ability for the perimeter portion to manifold fluids. In this manner, the perimeter manifold member 110 and inboard manifold member 112 may be formed. Any suitable bio-friendly stiffening substance may be used that allows the receiving manifold material to continue to manifold, or distribute, fluids; an example is a rapidly curing polyurethane spray. In still another illustrative embodiment, the perimeter manifold member 110 could be applied as a spray or gel directly against the wound edge 109 to form the perimeter manifold member 110 in situ and then a manifold member may be deployed in an interior portion that would form the inboard manifold member 112.
The perimeter manifold member 110 may be formed with an interior portion 115 and the inboard manifold member 112 may be disposed adjacent, which includes into, the interior portion 115. The perimeter manifold member 110 and the inboard manifold member 112 may be disposed adjacent to one another without more or may be coupled to one another by an adhesive, bonding, welding, or other means and thus formed as an integral unit. The perimeter manifold member 110 and the inboard manifold member 112 may also be separated by a space or by one or more items. As used herein, the term “coupled” includes coupling via a separate object and includes direct coupling. The term “coupled” also encompasses two or more components that are continuous with one another by virtue of each of the components being formed from the same piece of material. Also, the term “coupled” may include chemical, such as via a chemical bond, mechanical, thermal, or electrical coupling.
As shown in
There are many other ways to form the composite manifold 108. As another illustrative embodiment,
A bioactive material may be added to the perimeter manifold members 110, 210 to help provide treatment and care to the wound edge (e.g., wound edge 109 in
Referring again primarily to
The sealing member 111 may be an elastomeric material or any material or substance that provides a fluid seal. “Elastomeric” means having the properties of an elastomer and generally refers to a polymeric material that has rubber-like properties. More specifically, most elastomers have elongation rates greater than 100% and a significant amount of resilience. The resilience of a material refers to the material's ability to recover from an elastic deformation. Examples of elastomers may include, but are not limited to, natural rubbers, polyisoprene, styrene butadiene rubber, chloroprene rubber, polybutadiene, nitrile rubber, butyl rubber, ethylene propylene rubber, ethylene propylene diene monomer, chlorosulfonated polyethylene, polysulfide rubber, polyurethane, EVA film, co-polyester, and silicones. Further still, sealing member materials may include a silicone drape, 3M Tegaderm® drape, acrylic drape such as one available from Avery Dennison, or an incise drape.
The reduced-pressure subsystem 113 includes a reduced-pressure source 140, which can take many different forms. The reduced-pressure source 140 provides a reduced pressure as a part of the reduced-pressure treatment system 100. As used herein, “reduced pressure” generally refers to a pressure less than the ambient pressure at a tissue site 104 that is being subjected to treatment. In most cases, this reduced pressure will be less than the atmospheric pressure at which the patient is located. Alternatively, the reduced pressure may be less than a hydrostatic pressure at a tissue site. Reduced pressure may initially generate fluid flow in the manifold 112, delivery conduit 144, and adjacent to the tissue site 104. As the hydrostatic pressure around the tissue site 104 approaches the desired reduced pressure, the flow may subside, and the reduced pressure may be maintained. Unless otherwise indicated, values of pressure stated herein are gauge pressures.
The reduced pressure delivered may be constant or varied (patterned or random) and may be delivered continuously or intermittently. Although the terms “vacuum” and “negative pressure” may be used to describe the pressure applied to the tissue site, the actual pressure applied to the tissue site may be more than the pressure normally associated with a complete vacuum. Consistent with the use herein, an increase in reduced pressure or vacuum pressure typically refers to a relative reduction in absolute pressure.
Referring to the illustrative embodiment of
The reduced-pressure source 140 may be any device for supplying a reduced pressure, such as a vacuum pump, wall suction, or other source. While the amount and nature of reduced pressure applied to a tissue site will typically vary according to the application, the reduced pressure will typically be between −5 mm Hg and −500 mm Hg and more typically in a therapeutic range between −100 mm Hg and −200 mm Hg.
The reduced pressure developed by reduced-pressure source 140 is delivered through the delivery conduit 144 to a reduced-pressure interface 150, which may include an elbow port 152. In one illustrative embodiment, the elbow port 152 is a TRAC® technology port available from Kinetic Concepts, Inc. of San Antonio, Tex. The reduced-pressure interface 150 allows the reduced pressure to be delivered through the sealing member 111 to the composite manifold 108, as well as to a sealed space 154, in which the composite manifold 108 is located. In this illustrative embodiment, the reduced-pressure interface 150 extends through the sealing member 111 and into the composite manifold 108.
In operation according to one illustrative embodiment, the composite manifold 108 is placed adjacent the tissue site 104, e.g., in the wound bed on wound 102, with the perimeter manifold member 110 adjacent, or proximate, the wound edge 109. If a tape-style perimeter manifold member 110 is used as part of the composite manifold 108, the tape-style perimeter manifold member 110 would be uncoiled to track the wound perimeter or wound edge 109 of the wound 102 and then an appropriate size of the inboard manifold member 112 would be sized to go into a center portion defined by the perimeter manifold member 110. Alternatively, the inboard manifold member 112 may be sized to approximately match that of the wound 102 (allowing a small gap for the perimeter manifold member 110) and then tape placed on the periphery of the inboard manifold member 112 to form the composite manifold 108.
The sealing member 111 is then placed over the tissue site 104 and the composite manifold 108 and at least partially against epidermis 103 (or gasket or drape) to form a fluid seal and formed the sealed space 154. If not already installed, the reduced-pressure interface 150 is installed. The delivery conduit 144 is fluidly coupled to the reduced-pressure interface 150 and the reduced-pressure source 140 whereby reduced pressure may be provided to the composite manifold 108. The reduced-pressure source 140 may be activated to begin the delivery of reduced pressure to the composite manifold 108 in the sealed space 154.
When reduced pressure is supplied to the composite manifold 108, the composite manifold 108 compresses from an uncompressed state (
The system 100 allows reduced-pressure treatment to be applied with minimized compression at the wound margin, or wound edge, so as to minimize or prevent injury. The system 100 allows a bioactive factor to be readily applied to the wound edge 109.
While the illustrative embodiments present discrete portions (e.g., perimeter manifold member 110 and inboard manifold member 112) of the composite manifold 108, 208, it should be understood that the a gradual change may be used between portions or that a single piece of material may be used with support elements added. While the perimeter manifold member 110 is shown extending thickness of the inboard manifold member 112, in another embodiment, the perimeter manifold 110 may only be at a top portion (for the orientation of
Although the present invention and its advantages have been disclosed in the context of certain illustrative, non-limiting embodiments, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, permutations, and alterations can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. It will be appreciated that any feature that is described in a connection to any one embodiment may also be applicable to any other embodiment.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/620,086, entitled “A Reduced-Pressure, Composite Manifolds,” filed 17 Nov. 2009, which claims the benefit, under 35 U.S.C. §119(e), of the filing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/115,763, entitled “A Reduced-Pressure, Composite Manifold,” filed 18 Nov. 2008, each of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1355846 | Rannells | Oct 1920 | A |
2547758 | Keeling | Apr 1951 | A |
2632443 | Lesher | Mar 1953 | A |
2682873 | Evans et al. | Jul 1954 | A |
2910763 | Lauterbach | Nov 1959 | A |
2969057 | Simmons | Jan 1961 | A |
3066672 | Crosby, Jr. et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
3367332 | Groves | Feb 1968 | A |
3520300 | Flower, Jr. | Jul 1970 | A |
3568675 | Harvey | Mar 1971 | A |
3648692 | Wheeler | Mar 1972 | A |
3682180 | McFarlane | Aug 1972 | A |
3826254 | Mellor | Jul 1974 | A |
4080970 | Miller | Mar 1978 | A |
4096853 | Weigand | Jun 1978 | A |
4139004 | Gonzalez, Jr. | Feb 1979 | A |
4165748 | Johnson | Aug 1979 | A |
4184510 | Murry et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4233969 | Lock et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4245630 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4256109 | Nichols | Mar 1981 | A |
4261363 | Russo | Apr 1981 | A |
4275721 | Olson | Jun 1981 | A |
4284079 | Adair | Aug 1981 | A |
4297995 | Golub | Nov 1981 | A |
4333468 | Geist | Jun 1982 | A |
4373519 | Errede et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4382441 | Svedman | May 1983 | A |
4392853 | Muto | Jul 1983 | A |
4392858 | George et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4419097 | Rowland | Dec 1983 | A |
4465485 | Kashmer et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4475909 | Eisenberg | Oct 1984 | A |
4480638 | Schmid | Nov 1984 | A |
4525166 | Leclerc | Jun 1985 | A |
4525374 | Vaillancourt | Jun 1985 | A |
4540412 | Van Overloop | Sep 1985 | A |
4543100 | Brodsky | Sep 1985 | A |
4548202 | Duncan | Oct 1985 | A |
4551139 | Plaas et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4569348 | Hasslinger | Feb 1986 | A |
4605399 | Weston et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4608041 | Nielsen | Aug 1986 | A |
4640688 | Hauser | Feb 1987 | A |
4655754 | Richmond et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4664662 | Webster | May 1987 | A |
4710165 | McNeil et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4733659 | Edenbaum et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4743232 | Kruger | May 1988 | A |
4758220 | Sundblom et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4787888 | Fox | Nov 1988 | A |
4826494 | Richmond et al. | May 1989 | A |
4838883 | Matsuura | Jun 1989 | A |
4840187 | Brazier | Jun 1989 | A |
4863449 | Therriault et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872450 | Austad | Oct 1989 | A |
4878901 | Sachse | Nov 1989 | A |
4897081 | Poirier et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4906233 | Moriuchi et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4906240 | Reed et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4919654 | Kalt | Apr 1990 | A |
4941882 | Ward et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4953565 | Tachibana et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4969880 | Zamierowski | Nov 1990 | A |
4985019 | Michelson | Jan 1991 | A |
5037397 | Kalt et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5086170 | Luheshi et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5092858 | Benson et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100396 | Zamierowski | Mar 1992 | A |
5134994 | Say | Aug 1992 | A |
5149331 | Ferdman et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5167613 | Karami et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176663 | Svedman et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5215522 | Page et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5232453 | Plass et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5261893 | Zamierowski | Nov 1993 | A |
5278100 | Doan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279550 | Habib et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5298015 | Komatsuzaki et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5342376 | Ruff | Aug 1994 | A |
5344415 | DeBusk et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5358494 | Svedman | Oct 1994 | A |
5437622 | Carion | Aug 1995 | A |
5437651 | Todd et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5527293 | Zamierowski | Jun 1996 | A |
5549584 | Gross | Aug 1996 | A |
5556375 | Ewall | Sep 1996 | A |
5607388 | Ewall | Mar 1997 | A |
5636643 | Argenta et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5645081 | Argenta et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
6071267 | Zamierowski | Jun 2000 | A |
6135116 | Vogel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6241747 | Ruff | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6287316 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6345623 | Heaton et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6488643 | Tumey et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493568 | Bell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6553998 | Heaton et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6814079 | Heaton et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6942650 | Schultz | Sep 2005 | B1 |
20020077661 | Saadat | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020115951 | Norstrem et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120185 | Johnson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143286 | Tumey | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20060079852 | Bubb et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070027414 | Hoffman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080015480 | Benz | Jan 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
550575 | Mar 1986 | AU |
745271 | Apr 1999 | AU |
755496 | Feb 2002 | AU |
2005436 | Jun 1990 | CA |
43 06 478 | Sep 1994 | DE |
295 04 378 | Oct 1995 | DE |
0100148 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0117632 | Sep 1984 | EP |
0161865 | Nov 1985 | EP |
0358302 | Mar 1990 | EP |
1018967 | Aug 2004 | EP |
692578 | Jun 1953 | GB |
2 195 255 | Apr 1988 | GB |
2 197 789 | Jun 1988 | GB |
2 220 357 | Jan 1990 | GB |
2 235 877 | Mar 1991 | GB |
2 329 127 | Mar 1999 | GB |
2 333 965 | Aug 1999 | GB |
4129536 | Apr 1992 | JP |
71559 | Mar 1999 | SG |
8002182 | Oct 1980 | WO |
8704626 | Aug 1987 | WO |
9010424 | Sep 1990 | WO |
9309727 | May 1993 | WO |
9420041 | Sep 1994 | WO |
9605873 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9718007 | May 1997 | WO |
9913793 | Mar 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
N.A. Bagautdinov, “Variant of External Vacuum Aspiration in the Treatment of Purulent Diseases of the Soft Tissues,” Current Problems in Modern Clinical Surgery: Interdepartmental Collection, edited by V. Ye Volkov et al. (Chuvashia State University, Cheboksary, U.S.S.R. 1986);pp. 94-96 (certified translation). |
Louis C. Argenta, MD and Michael J. Morykwas, PhD; “Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment: Animal Studies & Basic Foundation”; Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 38, No. 6, Jun. 1997; pp. 553-562. |
Susan Mendez-Eastmen, RN; “When Wounds Won't Heal” RN Jan. 1998, vol. 61 (1); Medical Economics Company, Inc., Montvale, NJ, USA; pp. 20-24. |
James H. Blackburn, II, MD, et al; “Negative-Pressure Dressings as a Bolster for Skin Grafts”; Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 40, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 453-457. |
John Masters; “Reliable, Inexpensive and Simple Suction Dressings”; Letters to the Editor, British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1998, vol. 51 (3), p. 267; Elsevier Science/the British Association of Plastic Surgeons, UK. |
S.E. Greer, et al “The Use of Subatmospheric Pressure Dressing Therapy to Close Lymphocutaneous Fistulas of the Groin” British Journal of Plastic Surgery (2000), vol. 53, pp. 484-487. |
George V. Letsou, MD., et al; “Stimulation of Adenylate Cyclase Activity in Cultured Endothelial Cells Subjected to Cyclic Stretch”; Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 31, 1990, pp. 634-639. |
Orringer, Jay, et al; “Management of Wounds in Patients with Complex Enterocutaneous Fistulas”; Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Jul. 1987, vol. 165, pp. 79-80. |
International Search Report for Pot International Application PCT/GB95/01983; Nov. 23, 1995. |
PCT International Search Report for PCT International Application PCT/GB98/02713; Jan. 8, 1999. |
PCT Written Opinion; PCT International Application PCT/GB98/02713; Jun. 8, 1999. |
PCT International Examination and Search Report, PCT International Application PCT/GB96/02802; Jan. 15, 1998 & Apr. 29, 1997. |
PCT Written Opinion, PCT International Application PCT/GB96/02802; Sep. 3, 1997. |
Dattilo, Philip P., Jr., et al; “Medical Textiles: Application of an Absorbable Barbed Bi-directional Surgical Suture”; Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, vol. 2, Issue 2, Spring 2002, pp. 1-5. |
Kostyuchenok, B.M., et al; “Vacuum Treatment in the Surgical Management of Purulent Wounds”; Vestnik Khirurgi, Sep. 1986, pp. 18-21 and 6 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu. A., et al; “Vacuum Therapy in the Treatment of Purulent Lactation Mastitis”; Vestnik Khirurgi, May 14, 1986, pp. 66-70, and 9 page English translation thereof. |
Yusupov. Yu. N., et al; “Active Wound Drainage”, Vestnik Khirurgi, vol. 138, Issue 4, 1987, and 7 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu. A., et al; “Bacteriological and Cytological Assessment of Vacuum Therapy for Purulent Wounds”; Vestnik Khirurgi, Oct. 1988, pp. 48-52, and 8 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu. A., et al; “Concepts for the Clinical-Biological Management of the Wound Process in the Treatment of Purulent Wounds by Means of Vacuum Therapy”; Vestnik Khirurgi, Jul. 7, 1980, pp. 132-136, and 8 page English translation thereof. |
Chariker, Mark E., M.D., et al; “Effective Management of incisional and cutaneous fistulae with closed suction wound drainage”; Contemporary Surgery, vol. 34, Jun. 1989, pp. 59-63. |
Egnell Minor, Instruction Book, First Edition, 300 7502, Feb. 1975, pp. 24. |
Egnell Minor: Addition to the Users Manual Concerning Overflow Protection—Concerns all Egnell Pumps, Feb. 3, 1983, p. 1. |
Svedman, P.: “Irrigation Treatment of Leg Ulcers”, The Lancet, Sep. 3, 1983, pp. 532-534. |
Chinn, Steven D. et al.: “Closed Wound Suction Drainage”, The Journal of Foot Surgery, vol. 24, No. 1, 1985, pp. 76-81. |
Arnljots, Björn et al.: “Irrigation Treatment in Split-Thickness Skin Grafting of Intractable Leg Ulcers”, Scand J. Plast Reconstr. Surg., vol. 19, 1985, pp. 211-213. |
Svedman, P.: “A Dressing Allowing Continuous Treatment of a Biosurface”, IRCS Medical Science: Biomedical Technology, Clinical Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, vol. 7, 1979, p. 221. |
Svedman, P. et al.: “A Dressing System Providing Fluid Supply and Suction Drainage Used for Continuous or Intermittent Irrigation”, Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 17, No. 2, Aug. 1986, pp. 125-133. |
K.F. Jeter, T.E. Tintle, and M. Chariker, “Managing Draining Wounds and Fistulae: New and Established Methods,” Chronic Wound Care, edited by D. Krasner (Health Management Publications, Inc., King of Prussia, PA 1990), pp. 240-246. |
G. {hacek over (Z)}ivadinovic, V. ukić, {hacek over (Z)}. Maksimović, . Radak, and P. Pe{hacek over (s)}ka, “Vacuum Therapy in the Treatment of Peripheral Blood Vessels,” Timok Medical Journal 11 (1986), pp. 161-164 (certified translation). |
F.E. Johnson, “An Improved Technique for Skin Graft Placement Using a Suction Drain,” Surgery, Gynecology, and Obstetrics 159 (1984), pp. 584-585. |
A.A. Safronov, Dissertation Abstract, Vacuum Therapy of Trophic Ulcers of the Lower Leg with Simultaneous Autoplasty of the Skin (Central Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Moscow, U.S.S.R. 1967) (certified translation). |
M. Schein, R. Saadia, J.R. Jamieson, and G.A.G. Decker, “The ‘Sandwich Technique’ in the Management of the Open Abdomen,” British Journal of Surgery 73 (1986), pp. 369-370. |
D.E. Tribble, “An Improved Sump Drain-Irrigation Device of Simple Construction,” Archives of Surgery 105 (1972) pp. 511-513. |
C.E. Tennant, “The Use of Hypermia in the Postoperative Treatment of Lesions of the Extremities and Thorax,” Journal of the American Medical Association 64 (1915), pp. 1548-1549. |
Selections from W. Meyer and V. Schmieden, Bier's Hyperemic Treatment in Surgery, Medicine, and the Specialties: A Manual of Its Practical Application, (W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA 1909), pp. 17-25, 44-64, 90-96, 167-170, and 210-211. |
V.A. Solovev et al., Guidelines, The Method of Treatment of Immature External Fistulas in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract, editor-in-chief Prov. V.I. Parahonyak (S.M. Kirov Gorky State Medical Institute, Gorky, U.S.S.R. 1987) (“Solovev Guidelines”). |
V.A. Kuznetsov & N.A. Bagautdinov, “Vacuum and Vacuum-Sorption Treatment of Open Septic Wounds,” in II All-Union Conference on Wounds and Wound Infections: Presentation Abstracts, edited by B.M. Kostyuchenok et al. (Moscow, U.S.S.R. Oct. 28-29, 1986) pp. 91-92 (“Bagautdinov II”). |
V.A. Solovev, Dissertation Abstract, Treatment and Prevention of Suture Failures after Gastric Resection (S.M. Kirov Gorky State Medical Institute, Gorky, U.S.S.R. 1988) (“Solovev Abstract”). |
V.A.C.® Therapy Clinical Guidelines: A Reference Source for Clinicians (Jul. 2007). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140336603 A1 | Nov 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61115763 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12620086 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 14320234 | US |