The disclosure relates generally to medical treatment systems, and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to reduced-pressure dressings, systems, and methods employing desolidifying barrier layers.
Clinical studies and practice have shown that providing a reduced pressure in proximity to a tissue site augments and accelerates the growth of new tissue at the tissue site. The applications of this phenomenon are numerous, but application of reduced pressure has been particularly successful in treating wounds. This treatment (frequently referred to in the medical community as “negative pressure wound therapy,” “reduced pressure therapy,” or “vacuum therapy”) provides a number of benefits, which may include faster healing and increased formulation of granulation tissue. Unless otherwise indicated, as used herein, “or” does not require mutual exclusivity.
Improvements to existing reduced-pressure treatment apparatuses, systems, and methods may be realized by the apparatuses, systems, and methods of the illustrative, non-limiting embodiments herein. According to an illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a system for providing reduced-pressure therapy to a tissue site of a patient includes a reduced-pressure source for supplying reduced pressure and a manifold having a first, inward-facing surface and a second surface. The manifold is operable to transfer the reduced pressure. The system includes a first barrier layer covering at least a portion of the first, inward-facing surface of the manifold. The first barrier layer is for placement adjacent the tissue site and the first barrier layer is formed from a desolidifying material. The system also includes a drape for covering the second surface of the manifold and a portion of the patient's epidermis to provide a substantially sealed space containing the manifold and the first barrier layer.
According to another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, an apparatus includes a manifold having a first, inward-facing surface and a second surface. The manifold is operable to transfer reduced pressure. The apparatus also includes a first barrier layer covering at least a portion of the first, inward-facing surface of the manifold. The first barrier layer is formed from a desolidifying material.
According to another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a method for providing reduced-pressure therapy to a tissue site of a patient includes applying a dressing to the tissue site. The dressing includes a manifold having a first, inward-facing surface and a second surface, and the manifold is operable to transfer reduced pressure. The dressing also includes a first barrier layer covering at least a portion of the first, inward-facing surface of the manifold. The first barrier layer is formed from a desolidifying material. The method also includes allowing fluid at the tissue site to desolidify at least a portion of the first barrier layer to create a treatment aperture and applying a reduced pressure to the tissue site via the treatment aperture.
According to another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a method of manufacturing an apparatus for providing reduced-pressure therapy to a tissue site of a patient includes providing a manifold having a first, inward-facing surface and a second surface, and providing a first barrier layer formed from a desolidifying material. The method also includes coupling the first barrier layer to the first, inward-facing surface of the manifold.
In the following detailed description of the illustrative, non-limiting embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical structural, mechanical, electrical, and chemical changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. To avoid detail not necessary to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments described herein, the description may omit certain information known to those skilled in the art. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the illustrative embodiments are defined only by the appended claims.
Referring now to the drawings and primarily to
As used herein, “reduced pressure” generally refers to a pressure less than the ambient pressure at a tissue site that is being subjected to treatment. In most cases, this reduced pressure will be less than the atmospheric pressure at which the patient is located. Alternatively, the reduced pressure may be less than a hydrostatic pressure at the tissue site. Unless otherwise indicated, values of pressure stated herein are gauge pressures. The reduced pressure delivered may be constant or varied (patterned or random) and may be delivered continuously or intermittently. Although the terms “vacuum” and “negative pressure” may be used to describe the pressure applied to the tissue site, the actual pressure applied to the tissue site may be more than the pressure normally associated with a complete vacuum. Consistent with the use herein, an increase in reduced pressure or vacuum pressure typically refers to a relative reduction in absolute pressure.
The tissue site 106 may be the bodily tissue of any human, animal, or other organism, including bone tissue, adipose tissue, muscle tissue, dermal tissue, vascular tissue, connective tissue, cartilage, tendons, ligaments, or any other tissue. Treatment of the tissue site 106 may include removal of fluids, e.g., ascites, exudate, or delivery of reduced pressure. The wound 107 on the tissue site 106 may be due to a variety of causes, including trauma or surgery.
The dressing 104 includes the manifold 110 and the first barrier layer 112. The manifold 110 includes a first, inward-facing (tissue-facing) surface 114 and a second surface 116. The term “manifold” as used herein generally refers to a substance or structure that is provided to assist in applying reduced pressure to, delivering fluids to, or removing fluids from a tissue site 106. The manifold 110 typically includes a plurality of flow channels or pathways that improve distribution of fluids provided to and removed from the tissue site 106 around the manifold 110. The plurality of flow channels may be interconnected. The manifold 110 may be a biocompatible material that is capable of being placed in contact with the tissue site 106 and distributing reduced pressure to the tissue site 106. Examples of the manifold 110 may include, for example, without limitation, devices that have structural elements arranged to form flow channels, such as, for example, cellular foam, open-cell foam, porous tissue collections, liquids, gels, and foams that include, or cure to include, flow channels. The manifold 110 may be porous and may be made from foam, gauze, felted mat, or any other material suited to a particular biological application. In one embodiment, the manifold 110 is a porous foam and includes a plurality of interconnected cells or pores that act as flow channels. The porous foam may be a polyurethane, open-cell, reticulated foam, such as a GranuFoam® material manufactured by Kinetic Concepts, Incorporated of San Antonio, Tex. Other embodiments may include “closed cells.” In some situations, the manifold 110 may also be used to distribute fluids, such as medications, antibacterials, growth factors, and various solutions to the tissue site 106. Other layers may be included in or on the manifold 110, such as absorptive materials, wicking materials, hydrophobic materials, and hydrophilic materials.
The dressing 104 also includes the first barrier layer 112 that covers at least a portion of the first, inward-facing surface 114 of the manifold 110. The first barrier layer 112 is disposed adjacent to the tissue site 106 such that the first barrier layer 112 is disposed between the manifold 110 and the tissue site 106. The first barrier layer 112 may be fixedly or non-fixedly attached to the manifold 110. For example, the first barrier layer 112 may simply abut the manifold 110 without the aid of an adhesive or another attachment device. Also, the first barrier layer 112 may be coupled to the manifold 110. As used herein, the term “coupled” includes coupling via a separate object and includes direct coupling. The term “coupled” also encompasses two or more components that are continuous with one another by virtue of each of the components being formed from the same piece of material. Also, the term “coupled” may include chemical, such as via a chemical bond, mechanical, thermal, or electrical coupling. Specific non-limiting examples of the techniques by which the first barrier layer 112 may be coupled to the manifold 110 include welding (e.g., ultrasonic or RF welding), bonding, adhesives, cements, or other coupling techniques or devices.
The manifold 110 and the first barrier layer 112 are disposed within a sealed space 118 that is formed by a drape 120 that covers both the manifold 110 and the first barrier layer 112. The sealed space 118 that is formed by the drape 120 helps to maintain a therapeutic reduced pressure at the tissue site 106 and may include various components, such as the manifold 110 and the first barrier layer 112.
The drape 120 may be any material that provides a fluid seal. The drape 120 may, for example, be an impermeable or semi-permeable, elastomeric material. “Elastomeric” means having the properties of an elastomer. It generally refers to a polymeric material that has rubber-like properties. More specifically, most elastomers have ultimate elongations greater than 100% and a significant amount of resilience. The resilience of a material refers to the material's ability to recover from an elastic deformation. Examples of elastomers may include, but are not limited to, natural rubbers, polyisoprene, styrene butadiene rubber, chloroprene rubber, polybutadiene, nitrile rubber, butyl rubber, ethylene propylene rubber, ethylene propylene diene monomer, chlorosulfonated polyethylene, polysulfide rubber, polyurethane, EVA film, co-polyester, and silicones. Specific examples of the drape 120 include a silicone drape, 3M Tegaderm® drape, or a polyurethane drape such as one available from Avery Dennison of Pasadena, Calif.
An adhesive 121 may be used to hold the drape 120 against a patient's epidermis 138 or another layer, such as a gasket or additional drape. The adhesive 121 may take numerous forms. For example, the adhesive 121 may be a medically acceptable, pressure-sensitive adhesive that extends about a periphery 129 of the drape 120.
Reduced pressure is delivered to the sealed space 118 via a reduced-pressure interface or a connector 122. The connector 122 is at least partially disposed in an aperture 124 of the drape 120. The connector 122 may be held against the drape 120 using a second drape 126 that is held against the drape 120 using an adhesive 128. The adhesive 128 may be the same or similar to the adhesive 121 that is used to hold the drape 120 against the patient's epidermis 138. The second drape 126 can also be held against the connector 122 using an adhesive (not shown). In one illustrative embodiment, the connector 122 is a T.R.A.C.® Pad or Sensa T.R.A.C.® Pad available from KCI of San Antonio, Tex.
A reduced-pressure conduit 130 is used to deliver reduced pressure from the reduced-pressure source 102 to the connector 122. The reduced-pressure conduit 130 may include one or a plurality of lumens, each of which is capable of transferring reduced pressure or fluid. A medial portion 131 of the reduced-pressure conduit 130 may have one or more devices, such as a representative device 132. For example, the device 132 may be a fluid reservoir, or collection member, to hold exudates and other fluids removed, from the tissue site 106. Other examples of the device 132 that may be included on the medial portion 131 of the reduced-pressure conduit 130, or otherwise fluidly coupled to the reduced-pressure conduit 130, include the following non-limiting examples: a pressure-feedback device, a volume detection system, a blood detection system, an infection detection system, a flow monitoring system, or a temperature monitoring system. Some of these devices may be formed integrally to the reduced-pressure source 102. For example, a reduced-pressure port on reduced-pressure source 102 may include a filter member that includes one or more filters, e.g., an odor filter. Multiple devices 132 may be included.
The reduced-pressure source 102 may be any device for supplying a reduced pressure, such as a vacuum pump, wall suction, or other source. While the amount and nature of reduced pressure applied to the tissue site 106 will typically vary according to the application, the reduced pressure will typically be between −5 mm Hg and −500 mm Hg and more typically between −100 mm Hg and −300 mm Hg.
The first barrier layer 112 is formed from a desolidifying material. “Desolidifying material” means a material operable to desolidify in the presence of fluid, such as a liquid. Desolidification allows fluid communication to occur where the desolifying material has desolidified. Desolidification in this context includes dissolving, degrading, breaking apart, increasing fluid permeability, or transitioning from a solid to a liquid or other state, including a gel or gas. In some embodiments, the desolidifying material is removed or dissolved in the presence of liquid and in other embodiments the desolidfying material remains in part but allows fluid communication.
The first barrier layer 112 may be a flexible layer capable of conforming to the contours of the tissue site 106 and desolidifying in the presence of a fluid—typically a liquid. Non-limiting examples of materials from which the first barrier layer 112 may be formed include straight-chain polymers and a variety of water-soluble films, such as polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene oxide, cellulose derivatives, such as the sodium salt of carboxy methyl cellulose, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, or acrylics, such as polyacrylic acid, salts of polyacrylic acid, hydroxyl and carboxyl substituted polymers, and copolymers of acrylics and polyurethanes and their salts. The first barrier layer 112 may also be formed using a bioabsorbable material that relies on biological absorption to desolidify the first barrier layer 112. Such bioabsorbable materials may desolidify in the presence of biological material present at the tissue site 106, including particular biological groups that promote healing in the wound 107.
According to another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, in operation, the dressing 104 is applied to the tissue site 106 of the patient 108 such that the first barrier layer 112 is adjacent or abutting the tissue site 106 and may be adjacent to a portion of the patient's intact epidermis 138 as shown in
A second portion 136, or intact portion, of the first barrier layer 112 remains intact and does not desolidify when the reduced pressure is applied to the tissue site 106. The second portion 136 separates the manifold 110 from the epidermis 138 of the patient 108 and can prevent or reduce irritation of the patient's epidermis 138 caused by the manifold 110. The first barrier layer 112 can have a smooth inward-facing surface 135 that facilitates the inward migration of healthy skin toward the wound 107 in the direction of arrow 140. Thus, the first barrier layer 112 encourages epithelialization of the wound 107. Also, the first barrier layer 112 may have a moisture-vapor transmission rate (MVTR) that helps to prevent maceration of the portion of the patient's epidermis 138 that touches the second portion 136 of the first barrier layer 112. Using the illustrative embodiments, the dressing 104, and in particular the manifold 110 and the first barrier layer 112, need not be cut to fit the wound 107 because these components may overlay tissue surrounding the wound 107, such as the patient's epidermis 138, without unwanted maceration or irritation.
The fluid that causes the desolidification of at least a portion of the first barrier layer 112 may come from any of a variety of sources. For example, when reduced pressure is applied to the wound 107, exudate from the wound 107 may be drawn toward the first barrier layer 112 as indicated by the arrows 142. The exudate may then desolidify the first portion 133 of the first barrier layer 112 with which the exudate comes into contact to create the treatment aperture 134. In another, illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a gel (not shown) may be applied to the tissue site 106 or the wound 107 prior to applying the dressing 104 to the tissue site 106. The gel, which may be a water-based gel, may then act to desolidify the first portion 133 of the first barrier layer 112 with which the gel comes into contact. In yet another illustrative, non-limiting example, fluid may be provided to the dressing 104, and in particular the first barrier layer 112, by a fluid source (not shown) that supplies fluid through the reduced pressure conduit 130. In one embodiment, the device 132 may act as the fluid source.
The dressing 104 may be used on both dry and wet tissue sites. In the example in which the first barrier layer 112 is used on a relatively dry tissue site, the first bather layer 112 may be formed from a material that desolidifies in the presence of a lower amount of fluid. Alternatively, a gel, including a water-based gel, or colloid may be applied to the relatively dry tissue site before applying the dressing 104, and this pre-applied gel will cause the first barrier layer 112 to desolidify. In the contrasting case in which the tissue site 106 is relatively moist, the first barrier layer 112 may be formed from a material that desolidifies in response to larger amounts of fluid.
In another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, the first barrier layer 112, when brought into the presence of a fluid, may first turn into a gel before desolidifying into a liquid. The gel formed during the transition period between the solid and liquidified first barrier layer 112 may contain healing agents that are released into the wound 107. Examples of the healing agents that may be released from this gel include ionic groups, antimicrobials, anti-inflammatory factors, and growth factors. Other healing factors that are beneficial to the condition of the wound 107 or epidermis 138 and that encourage epithelialization may also be included in the gel. When the first barrier layer 112 desolidifies into a liquid, the liquid may be drawn through the manifold 110 and out of the dressing 104 using the reduced pressure that is supplied by the reduced-pressure source 102.
In other illustrative, non-limiting embodiments, additional layers may be added to the sealed space 118. For example, an absorbent layer, another manifold layer, another barrier layer, or other layers or components that facilitate reduced-pressure therapy may be included in the dressing 104 and disposed in the sealed space 118.
Referring now primarily to
The first and second barrier layers 112, 148 may also differ in other respects. For example, the first and second barrier layers 112, 148 may each respectively contain different healing agents that are adapted for different tissues or wound types. The first and second barrier layers 112, 148 may also each have a different moisture vapor transmission rates, hardness, smoothness, thickness, or other properties. In another illustrative, non-limiting example, either or both of the first and second barrier layers 112, 148 may be partially or wholly formed from a debridement material that encourages debridement at the tissue site through autolytic mechanisms. Either or both of the first and second barrier layers 112, 148 may also be able to release debridement agents (e.g., enzymes) that break down tissue, such as eschar and necrotic tissue. In another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, each lateral side 150, 152 of the manifold 110 may also be covered by a barrier layer.
Referring now primarily to
In another illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, the second barrier layer 148 may also include a plurality of perforations (not shown). In this embodiment, the percentage of the total surface area of each of the first and second barrier layers 154, 148 that is occupied by the perforations in each of these barrier layers 154, 148 may differ. For example, the first barrier layer 154 may have a higher density of perforations 156 than the second barrier layer 148. The perforations 156 in the first barrier layer 154 may also be larger or smaller than the perforations in the second barrier layer 148.
The perforations in each of the first and second barrier layers 154, 148 may also provide different fluid flow rates for each of these barrier layers before or during the time at which they desolidify. In this example, the perforations 156 in the first barrier layer 154 provide a flow rate X across the first barrier layer 154 for a given fluid and reduced pressure, while the perforations in the second barrier layer 148 provide a flow rate Y across the second barrier layer 148 for the same fluid and reduced pressure. The flow rate Y may be the same as or greater than X. By differing the flow rates between the first and second barrier layers 154, 148, each of these barrier layers may be used for particular types of wounds. In the example in which the second barrier layer 148 has a flow rate Y greater than the flow rate X in the first barrier layer 154, the second barrier layer 148 may be suited for placement adjacent to wounds that are drier wounds. These aforementioned embodiments that include differing barrier layers on different sides of the manifold 110 allow a caregiver to provide two treatment scenarios with a single dressing.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been disclosed in the context of certain illustrative, non-limiting embodiments, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, permutations, and alterations can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. It will be appreciated that any feature that is described in connection to any one embodiment may also be applicable to any other embodiment.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/823,958 filed Jun. 25, 2010 which claims the benefit, under 35 USC § 119(e), of the filing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/225,604 entitled “Reduced-Pressure Dressings, Systems, and Methods Employing Desolidifying Barrier Layers,” filed Jul. 15, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1355846 | Rannells | Oct 1920 | A |
2547758 | Keeling | Apr 1951 | A |
2632443 | Lesher | Mar 1953 | A |
2682873 | Evans et al. | Jul 1954 | A |
2910763 | Lauterbach | Nov 1959 | A |
2969057 | Simmons | Jan 1961 | A |
3066672 | Crosby, Jr. et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
3367332 | Groves | Feb 1968 | A |
3520300 | Flower, Jr. | Jul 1970 | A |
3568675 | Harvey | Mar 1971 | A |
3648692 | Wheeler | Mar 1972 | A |
3682180 | McFarlane | Aug 1972 | A |
3826254 | Mellor | Jul 1974 | A |
4080970 | Miller | Mar 1978 | A |
4096853 | Weigand | Jun 1978 | A |
4139004 | Gonzalez, Jr. | Feb 1979 | A |
4165748 | Johnson | Aug 1979 | A |
4184510 | Murry et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4233969 | Lock et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4245630 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4256109 | Nichols | Mar 1981 | A |
4261363 | Russo | Apr 1981 | A |
4275721 | Olson | Jun 1981 | A |
4284079 | Adair | Aug 1981 | A |
4297995 | Golub | Nov 1981 | A |
4333468 | Geist | Jun 1982 | A |
4373519 | Errede et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4382441 | Svedman | May 1983 | A |
4392853 | Muto | Jul 1983 | A |
4392858 | George et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4419097 | Rowland | Dec 1983 | A |
4465485 | Kashmer et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4475909 | Eisenberg | Oct 1984 | A |
4480638 | Schmid | Nov 1984 | A |
4525166 | Leclerc | Jun 1985 | A |
4525374 | Vaillancourt | Jun 1985 | A |
4540412 | Van Overloop | Sep 1985 | A |
4543100 | Brodsky | Sep 1985 | A |
4548202 | Duncan | Oct 1985 | A |
4551139 | Plaas et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4569348 | Hasslinger | Feb 1986 | A |
4605399 | Weston et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4608041 | Nielson | Aug 1986 | A |
4640688 | Hauser | Feb 1987 | A |
4655754 | Richmond et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4664662 | Webster | May 1987 | A |
4710165 | McNeil et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4733659 | Edenbaum et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4743232 | Kruger | May 1988 | A |
4758220 | Sundblom et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4787888 | Fox | Nov 1988 | A |
4826494 | Richmond et al. | May 1989 | A |
4838883 | Matsuura | Jun 1989 | A |
4840187 | Brazier | Jun 1989 | A |
4863449 | Therriault et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872450 | Austad | Oct 1989 | A |
4878901 | Sachse | Nov 1989 | A |
4897081 | Poirier et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4906233 | Moriuchi et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4906240 | Reed et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4919654 | Kalt et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4941882 | Ward et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4953565 | Tachibana et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4969880 | Zamierowski | Nov 1990 | A |
4985019 | Michelson | Jan 1991 | A |
5037397 | Kalt et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5086170 | Luheshi et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5092858 | Benson et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100396 | Zamierowski | Mar 1992 | A |
5134994 | Say | Aug 1992 | A |
5149331 | Ferdman et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5167613 | Karami et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176663 | Svedman et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5215522 | Page et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5232453 | Plass et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5261893 | Zamierowski | Nov 1993 | A |
5278100 | Doan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279550 | Habib et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5298015 | Komatsuzaki et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5342376 | Ruff | Aug 1994 | A |
5344415 | DeBusk et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5358494 | Svedman | Oct 1994 | A |
5437622 | Carion | Aug 1995 | A |
5437651 | Todd et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5527293 | Zamierowski | Jun 1996 | A |
5549584 | Gross | Aug 1996 | A |
5556375 | Ewall | Sep 1996 | A |
5607388 | Ewall | Mar 1997 | A |
5636643 | Argenta et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5645081 | Argenta et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
6071267 | Zamierowski | Jun 2000 | A |
6135116 | Vogel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6241747 | Ruff | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6287316 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6345623 | Heaton et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6488643 | Tumey et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493568 | Bell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6553998 | Heaton et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6814079 | Heaton et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
20020077661 | Saadat | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020115951 | Norstrem et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120185 | Johnson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143286 | Tumey | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20060079852 | Bubb et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060293630 | Manna et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070185426 | Ambrosio et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090198167 | Ambrosio | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090254053 | Svensby et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
550575 | Mar 1986 | AU |
745271 | Apr 1999 | AU |
755496 | Feb 2002 | AU |
2005436 | Jun 1990 | CA |
26 40 413 | Mar 1978 | DE |
43 06 478 | Sep 1994 | DE |
295 04 378 | Oct 1995 | DE |
0100148 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0117632 | Sep 1984 | EP |
0161865 | Nov 1985 | EP |
0358302 | Mar 1990 | EP |
1018967 | Aug 2004 | EP |
692578 | Jun 1953 | GB |
2 195 255 | Apr 1988 | GB |
2 197 789 | Jun 1988 | GB |
2 220 357 | Jan 1990 | GB |
2 235 877 | Mar 1991 | GB |
2 329 127 | Mar 1999 | GB |
2 333 965 | Aug 1999 | GB |
4129536 | Apr 1992 | JP |
71559 | Apr 2002 | SG |
8002182 | Oct 1980 | WO |
8704626 | Aug 1987 | WO |
90010424 | Sep 1990 | WO |
9309727 | May 1993 | WO |
94020041 | Sep 1994 | WO |
9605873 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9718007 | May 1997 | WO |
9913793 | Mar 1999 | WO |
03026544 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2007030598 | Mar 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
N.A. Bagautdinov, “Variant of External Vacuum Aspiration in the Treatment of Purulent Diseases of the Soft Tissues,” Current Problems in Modern Clinical Surgery: Interdepartmental Collection, edited by V. Ye Volkov et al. (Chuvashia State University, Cheboksary, U.S.S.R. 1986);pp. 94-96 (copy and certified translation). |
Louis C. Argenta, MD and Michael J. Morykwas, PhD; “Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment: Animal Studies & Basic Foundation”; Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 38, No. 6, Jun. 1997; pp. 553-562. |
Susan Mendez-Eastmen, RN; “When Wounds Won't Heal” RN Jan. 1998, vol. 61 (1); Medical Economics Company, Inc., Montvale, NJ, USA; pp. 20-24. |
James H. Blackburn, II, MD, et al; “Negative-Pressure Dressings as a Bolster for Skin Grafts”; Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 40, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 453-457. |
John Masters; “Reliable, Inexpensive and Simple Suction Dressings”; Letters to the Editor, British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1998, vol. 51 (3), p. 267; Elsevier Science/The British Association of Plastic Surgeons, UK. |
S.E. Greer, et al “The Use of Subatmospheric Pressure Dressing Therapy to Close Lymphocutaneous Fistulas of the Groin” British Journal of Plastic Surgery (2000), vol. 53, pp. 484-487. |
George V. Letsou, MD., et al; “Stimulation of Adenylate Cyclase Activity in Cultured Endothelial Cells Subjected to Cyclic Stretch”; Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 31, 1990, pp. 634-639. |
Orringer, Jay, et al; “Management of Wounds in Patients with Complex Enterocutaneous Fistulas”; Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Jul. 1987, vol. 165, pp. 79-80. |
International Search Report for PCT International Application PCT/GB95/01983; dated Nov. 23, 1995. |
PCT International Search Report for PCT International Application PCT/GB98/02713; dated Jan. 8, 1999. |
PCT Written Opinion; PCT International Application PCT/GB98/02713; dated Jun. 8, 1999. |
PCT International Examination and Search Report, PCT International Application PCT/GB96/02802; dated Jan. 15, 1998 & Apr. 29, 1997. |
PCT Written Opinion, PCT International Application PCT/GB96/02802; dated Sep. 3, 1997. |
Dattilo, Philip P., JR., et al; “Medical Textiles: Application of an Absorbable Barbed Bi-directional Surgical Suture”; Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, vol. 2, Issue 2, Spring 2002, pp. 1-5. |
Kostyuchenok, B.M., et al; “Vacuum Treatment in the Surgical Management of Purulent Wounds”; Vestnik Khirurgi, Sep. 1986, pp. 18-21 and 6 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu. A., et al; “Vacuum Therapy in the Treatment of Purulent Lactation Mastitis”; Vestnik Khirurgi, May 14, 1986, pp. 66-70, and 9 page English translation thereof. |
Yusupov. Yu. N., et al; “Active Wound Drainage”, Vestnik Khirurgi, vol. 138, Issue 4, 1987, and 7 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu. A., et al; “Bacteriological and Cytological Assessment of Vacuum Therapy for Purulent Wounds”; Vestnik Khirurgi, Oct. 1988, pp. 48-52, and 8 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu. A., et al; “Concepts for the Clinical-Biological Management of the Wound Process in the Treatment of Purulent Wounds by Means of Vacuum Therapy”; Vestnik Khirurgi, Jul. 7, 1980, pp. 132-136, and 8 page English translation thereof. |
Chariker, Mark E., M.D., et al; “Effective Management of incisional and cutaneous fistulae with closed suction wound drainage”; Contemporary Surgery, vol. 34, Jun. 1989, pp. 59-63. |
Egnell Minor, Instruction Book, First Edition, 300 7502, Feb. 1975, pp. 24. |
Egnell Minor: Addition to the Users Manual Concerning Overflow Protection—Concerns all Egnell Pumps, Feb. 3, 1983, p. 1. |
Svedman, P.: “Irrigation Treatment of Leg Ulcers”, The Lancet, Sep. 3, 1983, pp. 532-534. |
Chinn, Steven D. et al.: “Closed Wound Suction Drainage”, The Journal of Foot Surgery, vol. 24, No. 1, 1985, pp. 76-81. |
Arnljots, Björn et al.: “Irrigation Treatment in Split-Thickness Skin Grafting of Intractable Leg Ulcers”, Scand J. Plast Reconstr. Surg., vol. 19, 1985, pp. 211-213. |
Svedman, P.: “A Dressing Allowing Continuous Treatment of a Biosurface”, IRCS Medical Science: Biomedical Technology, Clinical Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, vol. 7, 1979, p. 221. |
Svedman, P. et al.: “A Dressing System Providing Fluid Supply and Suction Drainage Used for Continuous or Intermittent Irrigation”, Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 17, No. 2, Aug. 1986, pp. 125-133. |
K.F. Jeter, T.E. Tintle, and M. Chariker, “Managing Draining Wounds and Fistulae: New and Established Methods,” Chronic Wound Care, edited by D. Krasner (Health Management Publications, Inc., King of Prussia, PA 1990), pp. 240-246. |
G. {hacek over (Z)}ivadinovic, V. Ðukić, {hacek over (Z)}. Maksimović, Ð. Radak, and P. Pe{hacek over (s)}ka, “Vacuum Therapy in the Treatment of Peripheral Blood Vessels,” Timok Medical Journal 11 (1986), pp. 161-164 (copy and certified translation). |
F.E. Johnson, “An Improved Technique for Skin Graft Placement Using a Suction Drain,” Surgery, Gynecology, and Obstetrics 159 (1984), pp. 584-585. |
A.A. Safronov, Dissertation Abstract, Vacuum Therapy of Trophic Ulcers of the Lower Leg with Simultaneous Autoplasty of the Skin (Central Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Moscow, U.S.S.R. 1967) (copy and certified translation). |
M. Schein, R. Saadia, J.R. Jamieson, and G.A.G. Decker, “The ‘Sandwich Technique’ in the Management of the Open Abdomen,” British Journal of Surgery 73 (1986), pp. 369-370. |
D.E. Tribble, “An Improved Sump Drain-Irrigation Device of Simple Construction,” Archives of Surgery 105 (1972) pp. 511-513. |
C.E. Tennant, “The Use of Hypermia in the Postoperative Treatment of Lesions of the Extremities and Thorax,” Journal of the American Medical Association 64 (1915), pp. 1548-1549. |
Selections from W. Meyer and V. Schmieden, Bier's Hyperemic Treatment in Surgery, Medicine, and the Specialties: A Manual of Its Practical Application, (W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA 1909), pp. 17-25, 44-64, 90-96, 167-170, and 210-211. |
V.A. Solovev et al., Guidelines, The Method of Treatment of Immature External Fistulas in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract, editor-in-chief Prov. V.I. Parahonyak (S.M. Kirov Gorky State Medical Institute, Gorky, U.S.S.R. 1987) (“Solovev Guidelines”). |
V.A. Kuznetsov & N.A. Bagautdinov, “Vacuum and Vacuum-Sorption Treatment of Open Septic Wounds,” in II All-Union Conference on Wounds and Wound Infections: Presentation Abstracts, edited by B.M. Kostyuchenok et al. (Moscow, U.S.S.R. Oct. 28-29, 1986) pp. 91-92 (“Bagautdinov II”). |
V.A. Solovev, Dissertation Abstract, Treatment and Prevention of Suture Failures after Gastric Resection (S.M. Kirov Gorky State Medical Institute, Gorky, U.S.S.R. 1988) (“Solovev Abstract”). |
V.A.C.® Therapy Clinical Guidelines: A Reference Source for Clinicians (Jul. 2007). |
European Search Report dated Jun. 24, 2016, corresponding to EP16160737. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection for corresponding Application No. 2016134735, dated May 23, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130317464 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61225604 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12823958 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 13899385 | US |