Reduced registration bonding template

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10470848
  • Patent Number
    10,470,848
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 14, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 12, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A dental template for positioning an object on teeth of a patient and method for fabricating the same. The method includes creating a digital model of the patient's teeth, creating a simplified template model based on the digital model, and fabricating the dental template based on the simplified template model. The template model is simplified by removing certain features of the patient's tooth anatomy. The dental template can be located on a patient's teeth using four or fewer positioning teeth.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention relates generally to the field of orthodontics, and more particularly to an apparatus for bonding an orthodontic bracket to a tooth and a method for making the same.


The fundamental objectives in orthodontics are to move a patient's teeth to a position where the mechanical function of the dentition is optimized and to improve the aesthetic appearance of the patient's teeth. The traditional method that orthodontists use is to attach brackets and wires onto the patient's dentition. Once mounted on the teeth, the wires exert continual light forces through the brackets onto the teeth. These forces initiate the body's biological bone remodeling response and the teeth gradually progress toward their desired final positions. During the treatment period, the treatment professional reactively adjusts the wires and bands to provide a new force and move the teeth toward their desired or final destination.


Orthodontic brackets are often bonded directly to the patient's teeth using a small quantity of adhesive placed on the base of each bracket and the bracket is then placed on a selected tooth while the patient is in the dental chair. Once the adhesive has hardened, the bracket is bonded to the tooth with sufficient strength to withstand subsequent orthodontic forces as treatment progresses. One shortcoming with this technique is the difficulty in accessing the optimal position on the tooth surface for bracket placement on severely crowded teeth or in teeth where the bonding surface is obstructed by teeth in the opposing arch during jaw closure. With posterior teeth, the treatment professional may have difficulty seeing the precise position of the bracket relative to the tooth surface due to limited working space. Also, for most bonding agents, it is necessary to minimize moisture contamination from the patient's saliva for adequate bonding strength. This can prolong the procedure and also unduly impair the accuracy of placement of the brackets on the teeth.


One way to overcome some of the limitations of direct bracket placement is with indirect bonding. Typically, a routine impression of each of the patient's upper and lower dental arches is taken and either sent to a lab or used in the office to create a replica plaster model of each impression after the patient has left the office. Brackets are bonded to the sealed plaster models using a temporary adhesive. A transfer tray is then made by placing matrix material, usually consisting of silicone rubber, over both the model and brackets. The matrix material then assumes a configuration that matches the shape of the replica teeth of the plaster model with the brackets in the desired position. The matrix material then polymerizes and hardens to form a tray. The temporary adhesive is removed, and permanent adhesive is placed on the base of each bracket in the tray, which is then placed over matching portions of the patient's dental arches. Since the configuration of the interior surface of the tray closely matches the respective portions of the patient's dental arches, each bracket location is transferred onto the patient's teeth at precisely the same location that corresponds to the previous location of the same bracket on the plaster model. The adhesive is hardened and the matrix removed, leaving the brackets in the desired positions. This indirect method, however, is labor intensive and fabrication of the intricate details (corresponding to the details of the patient's teeth) of the tray is complex and time-consuming.


SUMMARY

In accordance with one embodiment, a method is provided for fabricating a dental template configured to position an object on teeth of a patient. A digital model of the patient's teeth is created. A template model is then created. The template model includes teeth based on the digital model. Some teeth on the template model include a substantially planar occlusal portion. A dental template is then fabricated using the template model.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows an exemplary process for fabricating a dental template for positioning an orthodontic object on a patient's tooth.



FIG. 2A shows an exemplary process for placing an orthodontic object on a patient's tooth.



FIG. 2B shows another process for placing an orthodontic object on a patient's tooth.



FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary process for fabricating the dental template



FIG. 3B shows a process for providing four possible templates.



FIG. 3C illustrates an embodiment of a simplified template having only certain reproduced features of a patient's teeth.



FIG. 3D shows in greater detail the area in circle A of FIG. 3C.



FIG. 3E shows in greater detail the area in circle B of FIG. 3C.





DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of a simplified dental template are disclosed to support positioning an object on a patient's tooth oriented in such a way that all objects as a whole are lined up to a user defined ideal arrangement. The template allows direct bonding of brackets and can be fabricated according to a simplified process, which is also disclosed herein. The process includes digitizing only some of the patient's teeth and/or simplifying the anatomical features of at least some of the patient's teeth; adding virtual objects to predetermined locations on the digitized teeth; and fabricating the dental template to locate the object on the patient's teeth. The dental template is designed to locate each object at a predetermined inclination or a predetermined angulation on the patient's tooth. The template can be used for etching or for positioning brackets on teeth. The skilled artisan will understand that the elements of the template and/or concepts of the fabrication methods described herein can be mixed and matched. For example, a template may be created using some steps from one method and other steps from one or more other methods.


The template is formed of a polymeric shell having a cavity shaped to fit over a patient's teeth and has openings that allow standardized brackets to be accurately positioned on teeth regardless of tooth surface variations from the norm for which the bracket base designed. The treatment can be done virtually and the placement of the brackets can be done using a template device that is a removable guide. This device allows precise placement of the bracket and enables bracket placement onto specific teeth independent of overall arch geometry. The template makes it easier for a less well-trained or an untrained person to bond a bracket. The system minimizes variations in the perception of distance and angles. The template allows precise control of the placement of the bracket. Since bracket placement is one of the critical variables to successful treatment, the template improves treatment precision from patient to patient and from tooth to tooth.



FIG. 1 shows an exemplary process of fabricating a dental template for positioning an object on a patient's tooth. First, the process digitizes the patient's tooth (10). Next, virtual objects are added to pre-determined locations on the digitized tooth (12). Finally, the process fabricates the dental template to locate the object on the patient's tooth (14). One detailed implementation of the method of FIG. 1 is described with reference to FIGS. 3A-3E below.



FIG. 2A shows an exemplary process for placing an orthodontic object on a patient's tooth. The process uses the template fabricated in the process of FIG. 1. The process includes placing the template on the patient's teeth (20); mounting the orthodontic object between the template and the tooth (22); and bonding the orthodontic object to the tooth (24). In the bonding operation, chemical curing or light curing adhesives can be used. In chemical curing, separately supplied curing components are mixed together and a small quantity of the mixture is placed on the back of the bracket prior to placing the bracket on the tooth. Light-curable adhesives include a photo-initiator that initiates the curing reaction once the adhesive is exposed to a sufficient amount of light. A common method of using light-curable adhesives for direct bonding includes the steps of placing a small quantity of the adhesive on the base of the bracket and then placing the bracket on the patient's tooth. The practitioner then shifts the bracket on the tooth as may be needed. Once the bracket is in its intended location, light from a dental curing unit is directed toward the adhesive for a time period sufficient to satisfactorily cure the adhesive.



FIG. 2B shows a second process of placing the orthodontic object on a patient's tooth. In this process, the orthodontic object is placed in the template (30). Next, the process includes inserting the template containing the orthodontic object onto the patient's teeth (32). Finally, the process includes bonding the orthodontic object to the tooth (34).



FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary process for fabricating the dental template. First, a digital model of a patient's teeth is obtained (102). The digital model can be obtained in a variety of ways. For example, the patient's teeth, or models thereof or impressions may be scanned or imaged using well-known technology, such as two or, three dimensional X-rays, computer-aided tomographic images or data sets, magnetic resonance images, etc. There are a variety of range acquisition systems, generally categorized by whether the process of acquisition requires contact with the three dimensional object (e.g., tooth) to be imaged. A contact-type range acquisition system uses a probe having multiple degrees of translational and/or rotational freedom. By recording the physical displacement of the probe as it is drawn across the sample surface of the object, a computer-readable representation of the sample object is made. A noncontact type range acquisition device can be either a reflective-type or transmissive-type system. There are a variety of reflective systems in use. Some of these reflective systems use non-optical incident energy sources, such as microwave radar or sonar. Others use optical energy. The non-contact type systems working by reflected optical energy further contain special instrumentation configured to permit certain measuring techniques to be performed (e.g., imaging radar, triangulation, and interferometry).


According to one embodiment, a digital model of only certain of the patient's teeth is obtained. For example, at least three teeth are digitized using one of the digitizing or scanning methods described above. According to an embodiment, four teeth are digitized for each of the upper (maxillary) and lower (mandibular) templates. In this embodiment, the four teeth for each of the upper and lower templates include the two central incisors and the two rearmost molars. The skilled artisan will understand that these four teeth can provide stability for positioning the template on a patient's teeth. In an alternative embodiment, three teeth for each of the upper and lower templates can be digitized: one of the central incisors and two mirror-image molars. According to another embodiment, all of the patient's teeth are digitized and a simplified digital model is later created, as discussed in more detail below.


Next, virtual brackets are selected and added (104) to the digital model of the patient's teeth. The virtual brackets are three-dimensional (3D) virtual models of physical brackets. The 3D model may be a computer aided design (CAD) model or may be scanned using scanners, as described above. The virtual brackets may be positioned on a digitized tooth using a computer or workstation having a suitable graphical user interface (GUI) and software appropriate for viewing and modifying the images. The above-described component identification and component manipulation software is designed to operate at sophistication commensurate with the operator's training level. For example, the component manipulation software can assist a computer operator, lacking orthodontic training, by providing feedback regarding permissible and forbidden manipulations on the teeth. On the other hand, an orthodontist, having greater skill in intra-oral physiology and teeth-moving dynamics, can simply use the component identification and manipulation software as a tool and disable or otherwise ignore the device.


While the methods described herein may rely on computer manipulation of digital data, the dental template or appliance may be produced by non-computer-aided techniques. For example, plaster casts, obtained as described above, may be cut using knives, saws, or other cutting tools in order to permit repositioning of individual teeth within the casting. The disconnected teeth may then be held in place by soft wax or other malleable material, and a plurality of intermediate tooth arrangements can then be prepared using such a modified plaster casting of the patient's teeth. The different arrangements can be used to prepare the template using pressure and vacuum molding techniques. While such manual creation of the appliance systems will generally be less preferred, appliance systems so produced will come within the scope of the present invention.


Using the CAD workstation, a combined digital model of the virtual brackets and the teeth can be produced (106). In one implementation, one of the two following template embodiments can be selected: Direct-Unified and Indirect-Unified, as discussed in more detail with reference to FIG. 3B.


Once the template has been fabricated, according to one embodiment, the template is set over the model of the patient's dental arches or otherwise positions the template in the approximate locations of their respective teeth. A thermoformed cast, or otherwise formed layer of flexible material, is deposited on the bodies of the templates and makes relatively durable contact with the bodies of the templates. This method may be performed either in a factory or in an orthodontist's office.


The system can produce both the template bodies and the inter-tooth position(s) at the same time and subsequently alters the stiffness of the various parts. One way of achieving this would be to produce the entire arch with a 3D printer, mask the tooth bodies from the inter-tooth portions, and invest the tooth bodies with a rigidifying agent and the inter-tooth portions with an agent to create flexibility.


As shown in FIG. 3A, from 110, if a directly formed template is produced, the process proceeds to 114, where each tooth is scaled; a cavity is then formed to enclose the tooth when the dental template or appliance is inserted over the patient's teeth. Next, excess material or unnecessary structures (e.g., anatomies of certain teeth, occlusal portions, and gingival portions) are removed from the digital model. The digital model is produced as a physical model. A flexible, pliable layer is formed and the resulting combination is trimmed to allow proper fit and function.


From 108, if a template of a whole arch (not articulated) is to be produced, the process proceeds to 116. In the case of an indirectly-produced template, the process forms an Aligner and excess material is removed (118).


In the case of a directly formed whole arch template, the process proceeds from 116 to 120 where the entire arch is scaled; cavities are then formed to enclose the arch when the dental template or appliance is inserted over the patient's teeth. Next, excess material or unnecessary structures (e.g., certain teeth, occlusal portions, gingival portions) are removed from the digital model. The digital model is produced as a physical model. A flexible, pliable layer is formed and the resulting combination is trimmed to allow proper fit and function.



FIG. 3B shows a process for providing two possible templates. First, the process acquires a digital model of dentition, adds virtual brackets to the teeth, and creates a combined model (180) including the dentition and the virtual brackets. Next, one of two template options can be selected.


The first option is a unified (or single piece) direct fabrication option where the process scales the patient's dental arch (about 105-150%), locates the original arch and scaled arch in the same 3-D space, creates a cavity of the original inside the scaled arch, removes gingival portions, tooth geometries of the occlusal portions of most teeth except for the positioning teeth, substantial portion of lingual tooth surfaces, substantial portion of the buccal surfaces, and buccogingival surfaces covering virtual brackets, and produces a real arch model from the digital model (182). For example, the occlusal portions of most of the teeth (i.e., teeth that are not used as positioning teeth) in the real arch model (and also the simplified combined digital model) may be substantially planar. According to an embodiment, not only are the tooth geometry features significantly reduced and simplified as noted above, but also the number of teeth having features reproduced; for example, a great deal of the tooth geometries are removed from all teeth except for four or fewer teeth used as positioning teeth. In one exemplary embodiment of a template 600 illustrated in FIGS. 3C-3E, only certain features are reproduced for four positioning teeth in each of the upper (maxillary) and lower (mandibular) templates: the two central incisors 610 (e.g., teeth #24 and #25 in the lower template) and the two rearmost molars 620 (e.g., teeth #19 and #30 in the lower template). For example, the occlusal surfaces are reproduced only for these four teeth 610, 620; the remaining teeth have substantially planar occlusal surfaces because they are simplified. The skilled artisan will appreciate that the four teeth 610, 620 and their reproduced features are useful in positioning the template 600 on the patient's dental arch, and that the simplified real arch model may be fabricated more quickly because it has fewer reproduced features of the patient's teeth. Such a simplified model and template 600 made using such a simplified model also requires less material. According to the embodiment of FIGS. 3C-3E, the template 600 is positioned using only the incisal surfaces of the central incisors 610 and the occlusal surfaces of the rearmost molars 620, rather than using all teeth. As shown in FIGS. 3C-3E, the incisal and occlusal surfaces are reproduced only in the central incisors 610 and rearmost molars 620. As shown in FIG. 3C, the occlusal surfaces of the remaining teeth in the template 600 are substantially planar, as they have been simplified and those of skill in the art will understand that adequate clearance in the upper and lower templates should be provided to limit occlusal surface contact for these other simplified teeth. It will be understood that the reproduced occlusal features of the central incisors 610 and the rearmost molars 620 are used to locate the template 600 along the z-axis and the template walls contacting each tooth's buccal surface are used to locate and secure the template 600 in the x and y direction. The skilled artisan will appreciate that only the occlusal surfaces of the patient's teeth having reproduced occlusal features on the template 600 contact the template 600 when the template is positioned on the patient's teeth. In alternative embodiments, other teeth can be selected for positioning the template. For example, for the upper template, teeth #2, #8, #9, and #15 may be selected and teeth 318, #24, #25, and #31 may be selected for the lower template. Also as noted above, three teeth may be selected: preferably, one of the central incisors and two contra lateral molars. The digital model is then converted to a physical model, likely through the use of a rapid prototyping method (e.g., Fused Deposition Modeling, 3-D Printing, and stereo lithography).


In the second option (unified indirect fabrication), the process produces a real model (e.g., mold) of the arch from a simplified digital model and forms a removable appliance (aligner) template on the real model of the arch. The real model can be fabricated using rapid prototyping methods. The skilled artisan will understand that the digital model is simplified by removing occlusal portions and buccal portions such that they are substantially planar in most of the teeth. The template is removed from the real model, and the process continues by removing gingival portions, substantial portion of lingual tooth surfaces, and buccogingival surfaces covering virtual brackets from the template (184). According to an embodiment, not only are the tooth geometry features significantly reduced and simplified, as noted above, but also the number of teeth having features reproduced on the real model of the arch; for example, the entire tooth geometries are removed from all teeth except for four or fewer teeth. In one embodiment, only certain features of four teeth remain for each of the upper (maxillary) and lower (mandibular) templates: the two central incisors and the two rearmost molars. The skilled artisan will appreciate that, as discussed above, these teeth and their reproduced features are useful in positioning the template on the patient's dental arch, and that the simplified real arch model may be fabricated more quickly because it has fewer features of the patient's teeth. The digital model is then converted to a physical model, likely through the use of a rapid prototyping method (e.g., Fused Deposition Modeling, 3-D Printing, and stereolithography).


In one embodiment, the template 600 is made from a thicker material (for example, at least 0.03 inch) to provide the user with more guidance in the depth direction. The thicker material for the template 600 is preferably in a range of about 0.02-0.06 inch, more preferably in a range of about 0.03-0.05 inch, and even more preferably about 0.04 inch. Furthermore, the thicker template allows easier positioning of the bracket to the tooth as there is more bracket surface area supported by the material. The template 600 may be made from materials that contain physical property switches for ease of removal. These switches might include temperature responsive, pH responsive, moisture responsive, or a multi-layer system wherein the layers have varying physical properties. More information on the fabrication of a dental template or appliance is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/794,324, entitled “Systems and Methods for Fabricating a Dental Template With a 3-D Object Placement,” filed Mar. 4, 2004, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.


Another embodiment of the template can be used for etching bonding chemicals on the patient's teeth. An etching template allows the practitioner to precisely etch the areas of the teeth on which the bracket will be placed. The etching template directs the user to predetermined locations on the teeth surface that need to be bonded. The etching template can be either a windowed template or a concave surfaced template where bonding gel is loaded or pre-loaded into the concavity. In some embodiments, cut-outs or windows of the template bound the regions to be etched to minimize teeth sensitivity to etching or unwanted enamel removal. In another embodiment of the etching template, the cut-outs or windows are not formed; instead, those areas are formed as concavities facing the tooth surfaces. The concavities can contain an etching compound, which can be exposed or activated prior to setting the template on the teeth.


Various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used in lieu of the above components. Additionally, the techniques described herein may be implemented in hardware or software, or in a combination of the two. The techniques may be implemented in computer programs executing on programmable computers that each includes a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and nonvolatile memory and/or storage elements), and suitable input and output devices. Each program can be implemented in a high level procedural or object-oriented programming language to operate in conjunction with a computer system. However, the programs can be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. The language may also be a compiled or interpreted language. Each such computer program can be stored on a storage medium or device (e.g., CD-ROM, hard disk, magnetic diskette) that is readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer for configuring and operating the computer when the storage medium or device is read by the computer to perform the procedures described. The system also may be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium, configured with a computer program, where the storage medium causes a computer to operate in a specific and predefined manner. Further, while the invention has been shown and described with reference to an embodiment thereof, those skilled in the art will understand that the above and other changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A system for positioning an object on teeth of a patient, the system comprising: one or more processors; andmemory, including instructions executable by the one or more processors to cause the system to at least:receive a digital model of an arch of a patient comprising a first subset of teeth and a second subset of teeth;generate a digital model of a polymeric shell shaped to fit over a portion of the arch of the teeth of the patient, the shell comprising a first portion shaped to receive the first subset of the teeth of the arch and a second portion shaped to receive the second subset of the teeth of the arch, the first portion comprising one or more tooth receiving cavities having occlusal or incisal geometries corresponding to occlusal or incisal tooth geometries of the first subset of the teeth, and the second portion comprising a planar occlusion portion spanning the second subset of the teeth, the planar occlusion portion having a continuous planar geometry comprising a reduced number of occlusal features relative to a number of occlusal features of the second subset of the teeth;determine whether the polymeric shell is articulated or not articulated;remove structures from the digital model of the polymeric shell based on the determination; andoutput the model of the polymeric shell for direct or indirect fabrication based on the determination.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first subset of the teeth includes no more than four of the teeth and the one or more tooth receiving cavities of the first portion of the shell have occlusal geometries that correspond to occlusal surfaces of corresponding teeth of the patient.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the no more than four of the teeth comprise at least one central incisor and two mirror-image molars.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of bracket models positioned on the model of the arch of the patient.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the model of the polymeric shell is configured to control placement of the object on the teeth of the patient.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the shell further comprises one or more openings shaped to control placement of one or more objects on the teeth of the patient.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the one or more objects comprise at least one bracket.
  • 8. The system of claim 6, wherein the one or more openings are shaped to locate each of the one or more objects at a predetermined inclination or predetermined angulation on the teeth of the patient.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the first portion reproduces at least one occlusal feature of the first subset of the teeth.
  • 10. One or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media having stored thereon executable instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of a computer system for positioning an object on teeth of a patient, cause the computer system to at least: receive a digital model of an arch of a patient comprising a first subset of teeth and a second subset of teeth;generate a digital of a polymeric shell shaped to fit over a portion of the arch of the teeth of the patient, the shell comprising a first portion shaped to receive the first subset of the teeth of the arch and a second portion shaped to receive the second subset of the teeth of the arch, the first portion comprising one or more tooth receiving cavities having occlusal or incisal geometries corresponding to occlusal or incisal tooth geometries of the first subset of the teeth, and the second portion comprising a planar occlusion portion spanning the second subset of the teeth, the planar occlusion portion having a continuous planar geometry comprising a reduced number of occlusal features relative to a number of occlusal features of the second subset of the teeth;determine whether the polymeric shell is articulated or not articulated;remove structures from the digital model of the polymeric shell based on the determination; andoutput the model of the polymeric shell for direct or indirect fabrication based on the determination.
  • 11. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10, wherein the first subset of the teeth includes no more than four of the teeth and the one or more tooth receiving cavities of the first portion of the shell have occlusal geometries that correspond to occlusal surfaces of corresponding teeth of the patient.
  • 12. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 11, wherein the no more than four of the teeth comprise at least one central incisor and two mirror-image molars.
  • 13. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10, further comprising a plurality of bracket models positioned on the model of the arch of the patient.
  • 14. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10, wherein the model of a polymeric shell is configured to control placement of the object on the teeth of the patient.
  • 15. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10, wherein the shell further comprises one or more openings shaped to control placement of one or more objects on the teeth of the patient.
  • 16. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 15, wherein the one or more objects comprise at least one bracket.
  • 17. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 15, wherein the one or more openings are shaped to locate each of the one or more objects at a predetermined inclination or predetermined angulation on the teeth of the patient.
  • 18. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10, wherein the first portion reproduces at least one occlusal feature of the first subset of the teeth.
CROSS-REFERENCE

This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/846,322, filed Mar. 18, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,744,002, issued Aug. 29, 2017, which is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/338,307, filed Dec. 18, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,401,686, issued Mar. 19, 2013, the entirety of each are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (197)
Number Name Date Kind
2467432 Kesling Apr 1949 A
3407500 Kesling Oct 1968 A
3600808 James Aug 1971 A
3660900 Lawrence May 1972 A
3683502 Melvin Aug 1972 A
3738005 Cohen et al. Jun 1973 A
3860803 Levine Jan 1975 A
3916526 Schudy Nov 1975 A
3922786 Lavin Dec 1975 A
3950851 Bergersen Apr 1976 A
3983628 Acevedo Oct 1976 A
4014096 Dellinger Mar 1977 A
4195046 Kesling Mar 1980 A
4253828 Coles et al. Mar 1981 A
4324546 Heitlinger et al. Apr 1982 A
4324547 Arcan et al. Apr 1982 A
4348178 Kurz Sep 1982 A
4478580 Barrut Oct 1984 A
4500294 Lewis Feb 1985 A
4504225 Yoshii Mar 1985 A
4505673 Yoshii Mar 1985 A
4526540 Dellinger Jul 1985 A
4575330 Hull Mar 1986 A
4575805 Moermann et al. Mar 1986 A
4591341 Andrews May 1986 A
4609349 Cain Sep 1986 A
4611288 Duret et al. Sep 1986 A
4656860 Orthuber et al. Apr 1987 A
4663720 Duret et al. May 1987 A
4664626 Kesling May 1987 A
4676747 Kesling Jun 1987 A
4742464 Duret et al. May 1988 A
4755139 Abbatte et al. Jul 1988 A
4763791 Halverson et al. Aug 1988 A
4793803 Martz Dec 1988 A
4798534 Breads Jan 1989 A
4836778 Baumrind et al. Jun 1989 A
4837732 Brandestini et al. Jun 1989 A
4850864 Diamond Jul 1989 A
4850865 Napolitano Jul 1989 A
4856991 Breads et al. Aug 1989 A
4877398 Kesling Oct 1989 A
4880380 Martz Nov 1989 A
4889238 Batchelor Dec 1989 A
4890608 Steer Jan 1990 A
4935635 O'Harra Jun 1990 A
4936862 Walker et al. Jun 1990 A
4937928 Van Der Zel Jul 1990 A
4941826 Loran et al. Jul 1990 A
4964770 Steinbichler et al. Oct 1990 A
4975052 Spencer et al. Dec 1990 A
4983334 Adell Jan 1991 A
5011405 Lemchen Apr 1991 A
5017133 Miura May 1991 A
5027281 Rekow et al. Jun 1991 A
5035613 Breads et al. Jul 1991 A
5055039 Abbatte et al. Oct 1991 A
5059118 Breads et al. Oct 1991 A
5100316 Wildman Mar 1992 A
5121333 Riley et al. Jun 1992 A
5125832 Kesling Jun 1992 A
5128870 Erdman et al. Jul 1992 A
5130064 Smalley et al. Jul 1992 A
5131843 Hilgers et al. Jul 1992 A
5131844 Marinaccio et al. Jul 1992 A
5139419 Andreiko et al. Aug 1992 A
5145364 Martz et al. Sep 1992 A
5176517 Truax Jan 1993 A
5184306 Erdman et al. Feb 1993 A
5186623 Breads et al. Feb 1993 A
5257203 Riley et al. Oct 1993 A
5273429 Rekow et al. Dec 1993 A
5278756 Lemchen et al. Jan 1994 A
5328362 Watson et al. Jul 1994 A
5338198 Wu et al. Aug 1994 A
5340309 Robertson Aug 1994 A
5342202 Deshayes Aug 1994 A
5368478 Andreiko et al. Nov 1994 A
5382164 Stern Jan 1995 A
5395238 Andreiko et al. Mar 1995 A
5431562 Andreiko et al. Jul 1995 A
5440326 Quinn Aug 1995 A
5440496 Andersson et al. Aug 1995 A
5447432 Andreiko et al. Sep 1995 A
5452219 Dehoff et al. Sep 1995 A
5454717 Andreiko et al. Oct 1995 A
5456600 Andreiko et al. Oct 1995 A
5474448 Andreiko et al. Dec 1995 A
RE35169 Lemchen et al. Mar 1996 E
5518397 Andreiko et al. May 1996 A
5528735 Strasnick et al. Jun 1996 A
5533895 Andreiko et al. Jul 1996 A
5542842 Andreiko et al. Aug 1996 A
5549476 Stern Aug 1996 A
5562448 Mushabac Oct 1996 A
5587912 Andersson et al. Dec 1996 A
5605459 Kuroda et al. Feb 1997 A
5607305 Andersson et al. Mar 1997 A
5614075 Andre, Sr. Mar 1997 A
5621648 Crump Apr 1997 A
5645420 Bergersen Jul 1997 A
5645421 Slootsky Jul 1997 A
5655653 Chester Aug 1997 A
5683243 Andreiko et al. Nov 1997 A
5692894 Schwartz et al. Dec 1997 A
5725376 Poirier Mar 1998 A
5725378 Wang Mar 1998 A
5733126 Andersson et al. Mar 1998 A
5740267 Echerer et al. Apr 1998 A
5742700 Yoon et al. Apr 1998 A
5799100 Clarke et al. Aug 1998 A
5800174 Andersson Sep 1998 A
5823778 Schmitt et al. Oct 1998 A
5848115 Little et al. Dec 1998 A
5857853 Van et al. Jan 1999 A
5866058 Batchelder et al. Feb 1999 A
5879158 Doyle et al. Mar 1999 A
5880961 Crump Mar 1999 A
5880962 Andersson et al. Mar 1999 A
5934288 Avila et al. Aug 1999 A
5957686 Anthony Sep 1999 A
5964587 Sato Oct 1999 A
5971754 Sondhi et al. Oct 1999 A
5975893 Chishti et al. Nov 1999 A
6015289 Andreiko et al. Jan 2000 A
6044309 Honda Mar 2000 A
6049743 Baba Apr 2000 A
6062861 Andersson May 2000 A
6068482 Snow May 2000 A
6099314 Kopelman et al. Aug 2000 A
6123544 Cleary Sep 2000 A
6152731 Jordan et al. Nov 2000 A
6174168 Dehoff et al. Jan 2001 B1
6183248 Chishti et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190165 Andreiko et al. Feb 2001 B1
6217325 Chishti et al. Apr 2001 B1
6217334 Hultgren Apr 2001 B1
6244861 Andreiko et al. Jun 2001 B1
6283753 Willoughby Sep 2001 B1
6309215 Phan et al. Oct 2001 B1
6315553 Sachdeva et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322359 Jordan et al. Nov 2001 B1
6350120 Sachdeva et al. Feb 2002 B1
6382975 Poirier May 2002 B1
6398548 Muhammad et al. Jun 2002 B1
6402707 Ernst Jun 2002 B1
6482298 Bhatnagar Nov 2002 B1
6488503 Lichkus et al. Dec 2002 B1
6524101 Phan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6554611 Chishti et al. Apr 2003 B2
6572372 Phan et al. Jun 2003 B1
6629840 Chishti et al. Oct 2003 B2
6705863 Phan et al. Mar 2004 B2
6722880 Chishti et al. Apr 2004 B2
7056115 Phan et al. Jun 2006 B2
7442040 Kuo Oct 2008 B2
7476100 Kuo Jan 2009 B2
7600999 Knopp Oct 2009 B2
7658610 Knopp Feb 2010 B2
8401686 Moss et al. Mar 2013 B2
9326831 Cheang May 2016 B2
9744002 Moss Aug 2017 B2
20020006597 Andreiko et al. Jan 2002 A1
20030009252 Pavlovskaia et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030139834 Nikolskiy et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030162147 Dequeker Aug 2003 A1
20030190584 Heasley Oct 2003 A1
20030222366 Stangel et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030224311 Cronauer Dec 2003 A1
20040128010 Pavlovskaia et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040214140 Fischer et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040229185 Knopp Nov 2004 A1
20040253562 Knopp Dec 2004 A1
20050042569 Phan et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050055118 Nikolskiy et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050064360 Wen et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050070782 Brodkin Mar 2005 A1
20060084030 Phan et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060154207 Kuo Jul 2006 A1
20060257817 Shelton Nov 2006 A1
20070009855 Stonisch et al. Jan 2007 A1
20080032257 Muckler Feb 2008 A1
20080064005 Meitner Mar 2008 A1
20080096152 Cheang Apr 2008 A1
20080160485 Touchstone Jul 2008 A1
20080166681 Weinstein et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080176189 Stonisch Jul 2008 A1
20080280247 Sachdeva et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294405 Kitching et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090017410 Raby et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090075235 Letcher Mar 2009 A1
20090162813 Glor et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090220921 Abolfathi et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090298017 Boerjes et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100159412 Moss et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100159413 Kuo Jun 2010 A1
20100244294 Karim et al. Sep 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (27)
Number Date Country
3031677 May 1979 AU
517102 Jul 1981 AU
5598894 Jun 1994 AU
1121955 Apr 1982 CA
2749802 May 1978 DE
69327661 Jul 2000 DE
0091876 Oct 1983 EP
0299490 Jan 1989 EP
0376873 Jul 1990 EP
0490848 Jun 1992 EP
0541500 May 1993 EP
0667753 Jan 2000 EP
0774933 Dec 2000 EP
0731673 May 2001 EP
463897 Jan 1980 ES
2369828 Jun 1978 FR
2652256 Mar 1991 FR
1550777 Aug 1979 GB
S5358191 May 1978 JP
H0428359 Jan 1992 JP
H08508174 Sep 1996 JP
WO-9008512 Aug 1990 WO
WO-9104713 Apr 1991 WO
WO-9410935 May 1994 WO
WO-9832394 Jul 1998 WO
WO-9844865 Oct 1998 WO
WO-9858596 Dec 1998 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (155)
Entry
AADR. American Association for Dental Research, Summary of Activities, Mar. 20-23, 1980, Los Angeles, CA, p. 195.
Alcaniz, et aL, “An Advanced System for the Simulation and Planning of Orthodontic Treatments,” Karl Heinz Hohne and Ron Kikinis (eds.), Visualization in Biomedical Computing, 4th Intl. Conf., VBC '96, Hamburg, Germany, Sep. 22-25, 1996, Springer-Verlag, pp. 511-520.
Alexander et al., “The DigiGraph Work Station Part 2 Clinical Management,” JCO, pp. 402-407 (Jul. 1990).
Altschuler, “3D Mapping of Maxillo-Facial Prosthesis,” AADR Abstract #607, 2 pages total, (1980).
Altschuler et al., “Analysis of 3-D Data for Comparative 3-D Serial Growth Pattern Studies of Oral-Facial Structures,” AADR Abstracts, Program and Abstracts of Papers, 57th General Session, IADR HP Annual Session, Mar. 29, 1979-Apr. 1, 1979, New Orleans Marriot, Journal of Dental Research, vol. 58, Jan. 1979, Special Issue A, p. 221.
Altschuler et al., “Laser Electro-Optic System for Rapid Three-Dimensional (3D) Topographic Mapping of Surfaces,” Optical Engineering, 20(6):953-961 (1981).
Altschuler et al., “Measuring Surfaces Space-Coded by a Laser-Projected Dot Matrix,” SPIE Imaging Applications for Automated Industrial Inspection and Assembly, vol. 182, p. 187-191 (1979).
Andersson et al., “Clinical Results with Titanium Crowns Fabricated with Machine Duplication and Spark Erosion,” Acta. Odontol. Scand., 47:279-286 (1989).
Bartels, et al., An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 422-425 (1987).
Baumrind, “A System for Craniofacial Mapping Through the Integration of Data from Stereo X-Ray Films and Stereo Photographs,” an invited paper submitted to the 1975 American Society of Photogram Symposium on Close-Range Photogram Systems, University of III., Aug. 26-30, 1975, pp. 142-166.
Baumrind et al., “A Stereophotogrammetric System for the Detection of Prosthesis Loosening in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” NATO Symposium on Applications of Human Biostereometrics, Jul. 9-13, 1978, SPIE, vol. 166, pp. 112-123.
Baumrind et al., “Mapping the Skull in 3-D,” reprinted from J. Calif. Dent. Assoc., 48(2), 11 pages total, (1972 Fall Issue).
Baumrind, “Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping: Background, Principles, and Perspectives,” Semin. in Orthod., 7(4):223-232 (Dec. 2001).
Begole et al., “A Computer System for the Analysis of Dental Casts,” The Angle Orthod., 51(3):253-259 (Jul. 1981).
Bernard et al.,“Computerized Diagnosis in Orthodontics for Epidemiological Studies: A Progress Report,” Abstract, J. Dental Res. Special Issue, vol. 67, p. 169, paper presented at International Association for Dental Research 66th General Session, Mar. 9-13, 1988, Montreal, Canada.
Bhatia et al., “A Computer-Aided Design for Orthognathic Surgery,” Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 22:237-253 (1984).
Biggerstaff, “Computerized Diagnostic Setups and Simulations,” Angle Orthod., 40(1):28-36 (Jan. 1970).
Biggerstaff et al., “Computerized Analysis of Occlusion in the Postcanine Dentition,” Am. J. Orthod., 61(3): 245-254 (Mar. 1972).
Blu, et al., “Linear interpolation revitalized”, IEEE Trans. Image Proc., 13(5):710-719 (May 2004.
Bourke, “Coordinate System Transformation,” (Jun. 1996), p. 1, retrieved from the Internet Nov. 5, 2004, URL<http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/-pbourke/prolection/coords>.
Boyd et al., “Three Dimensional Diagnosis and Orthodontic Treatment of Complex Malocclusions With the lnvisalipn Appliance,” Semin. Orthod., 7(4):274-293 (Dec. 2001).
Brandestini et al., “Computer Machined Ceramic Inlays: In Vitro Marginal Adaptation,” J. Dent. Res. Special Issue, Abstract 305, vol. 64, p. 208 (1985).
Brook et al., “An Image Analysis System for the Determination of Tooth Dimensions from Study Casts: Comparison with Manual Measurements of Mesio-distal Diameter,” J. Dent. Res., 65(3):428-431 (Mar. 1986).
Burstone et al., Precision Adjustment of the Transpalatal Lingual Arch: Computer Arch Form IN Predetermination, Am, Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 79, No. 2 (Feb. 1981), pp. 115-133.
Burstone (interview), “Dr. Charles J. Burstone on The Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 1),” J. Clin. Orthod., 13(7):442-453 (Jul. 1979).
Burstone (interview), “Dr. Charles J. Burstone on The Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 2),” J. Clin. Orthod., 13(8):539-551 (Aug. 1979).
Cardinal Industrial Finishes, Powder Coatings information posted at<http://www.cardinalpaint.com> on Aug. 25, 2000, 2 pages.
Carnaghan, “An Alternative to Holograms for the Portrayal of Human Teeth,” 4th Int'l. Conf. on Holographic Systems, Components and Applications, Sep. 15, 1993, pp. 228-231.
Chaconas et al., “The DigiGraph Work Station, Part 1, Basic Concepts,” JCO, pp. 360-367 (Jun. 1990).
Chafetz et al., “Subsidence of the Femoral Prosthesis, A Stereophotogrammetric Evaluation,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., No. 201, pp. 60-67 (Dec. 1985).
Chiappone, (1980). Constructing the Gnathologic Setup and Positioner, J. Clin. Orthod, vol. 14, pp. 121-133.
Cottingham, (1969). Gnathologic Clear Plastic Positioner, Am. J. Orthod, vol. 55, pp. 23-31.
Crawford, “CAD/CAM in the Dental Office: Does It Work?”, Canadian Dental Journal, vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 121-123 (Feb. 1991).
Crawford, “Computers in Dentistry: Part 1 CAD/CAM: The Computer Moves Chairside,” Part 2 F. Duret —A Man with a Vision,“ Part 3 The Computer Gives New Vision—Literally,” Part 4 Bytes 'N Bites—The Computer Moves from the Front Desk to the Operatory, Canadian Dental Journal, vol. 54 (9), pp. 661-666 (1988).
Crooks, “CAD/CAM Comes to USC,” USC Dentistry, pp. 14-17 (Spring 1990).
Cureton, Correcting Malaligned Mandibular Incisors with Removable Retainers, J. Clin. Orthod, vol. 30, No. 7 (1996) pp. 390-395.
Curry et al., “Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping at the Craniofacial Research Instrumentation Laboratory/University of the Pacific,” Semin. Orthod., 7(4):258-265 (Dec. 2001).
Cutting et a/., “Three-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Design of Craniofacial Surgical Procedures: Optimization and Interaction with Cephalometric and CT-Based Models,” Plast. 77(6):877-885 (Jun. 1986).
DCS Dental AG, “The CAD/CAM 'DCS Titan System' for Production of Crowns/Bridges,” DSC Production AG, pp. 1-7 (Jan. 1992.
Definition for gingiva. Dictionary.com p. 1-3. Retrieved from the internet Nov. 5, 2004<http://reference.com/search/search?q=gingiva>.
Defranco et al., “Three-Dimensional Large Displacement Analysis of Orthodontic Appliances,” J. Biomechanics, 9:793-801 (1976).
Dental Institute University of Zurich Switzerland, Program for International Symposium JD on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the CEREC-Method, May 1991, 2 pages total.
DENT-X posted on Sep. 24, 1998 at<http://www.dent-x.com/DentSim.htm>, 6 pages.
Doyle, “Digital Dentistry,” Computer Graphics World, pp. 50-52, 54 (Oct. 2000).
Duret et al., “CAD/CAM Imaging in Dentistry,” Curr. Opin. Dent., 1:150-154 (1991).
Duret et al, “CAD-CAM in Dentistry,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 117:715-720 (Nov. 1988).
Duret, “The Dental CAD/CAM, General Description of the Project,” Hennson International Product Brochure, 18 pages total, Jan. 1986.
Duret,“Vers Une Prosthese Informatisee,” (English translation attached), Tonus, vol. 75, pp. 55-57 (Nov. 15, 1985).
Economides, “The Microcomputer in the Orthodontic Office,” JCO, pp. 767-772 (Nov. 1979).
Elsasser, Some Observations on the History and Uses of the Kesling Positioner, Am. J. Orthod. (1950) 36:368-374.
English translation of Japanese Laid-Open Publication No. 63-11148 to inventor T. Ozukuri (Laid-Open on Jan. 18, 1998) pp. 1-7.
Felton et al., “A Computerized Analysis of the Shape and Stability of Mandibular Arch Form,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92(6):478-483 (Dec. 1987).
Friede et al., “Accuracy of Cephalometric Prediction in Orthognathic Surgery,” Abstract of Papers, J. Dent. Res., 70:754-760 (1987).
Futterling et a/., “Automated Finite Element Modeling of a Human Mandible with Dental Implants,” JS WSCG '98 -Conference Program, retrieved from the Internet<http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/papers98/Strasser 98.pdf>, 8 pages.
Gao et al., “3-D element Generation for Multi-Connected Complex Dental and Mandibular Structure,” Proc. Intl Workshop on Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality, pp. 267-271 (Jun. 12, 2001).
GIM-Alldent Deutschland, “Das DUX System: Die Technik,” 2 pages total (2002).
Gottleib et al., “JCO Interviews Dr. James A. McNamura, Jr., on the Frankel Appliance: Part 2: Clinical 1-1 Management,”J. Clin. Orthod., 16(6):390-407 (Jun. 1982).
Grayson, “New Methods for Three Dimensional Analysis of Craniofacial Deformity, Symposium: JW Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxiiofacial Surgery,” AAOMS, 3 pages total, (Sep. 13, 1990).
Guess et al., “Computer Treatment Estimates in Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery,” JCO, pp. 262-228 (Apr. 1989).
Heaven et a/., “Computer-Based Image Analysis of Artificial Root Surface Caries,” Abstracts of Papers, J. Dent. Res., 70:528 (Apr. 17-21, 1991).
Highbeam Research, “Simulating Stress Put on Jaw,” Tooling & Production [online], Nov. 1996, n pp. 1-2, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, URL http://static.highbeam.com/t/toolingampproduction/november011996/simulatingstressputonfa . . . >.
Hikage, “Integrated Orthodontic Management System for Virtual Three-Dimensional Computer Graphic Simulation and Optical Video Image Database for Diagnosis and Treatment Planning”, Journal of Japan KA Orthodontic Society, Feb. 1987, English translation, pp. 1-38, Japanese version, 46(2), pp. 248-269 (60 pages total).
Hoffmann, et al., “Role of Cephalometry for Planning of Jaw Orthopedics and Jaw Surgery Procedures,” (Article Summary in English, article in German), Informatbnen, pp. 375-396 (Mar. 1991).
Hojjatie et al., “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Glass-Ceramic Dental Crowns,” J. Biomech., 23(11):1157-1166 (1990).
Huckins, “CAD-CAM Generated Mandibular Model Prototype from MRI Data,” AAOMS, p. 96 (1999).
Important Tip About Wearing the Red White & Blue Active Clear Retainer System, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab, 1 page 1998).
JCO Interviews, Craig Andreiko , DDS, MS on the Elan and Orthos Systems, JCO, pp. 459-468 (Aug. 1994).
JCO Interviews, Dr. Homer W. Phillips on Computers in Orthodontic Practice, Part 2, JCO. 1997; 1983:819-831.
Jerrold, “The Problem, Electronic Data Transmission and the Law,” AJO-DO, pp. 478-479 (Apr. 1988).
Jones et al., “An Assessment of the Fit of a Parabolic Curve to Pre- and Post-Treatment Dental Arches,” Br. J. Orthod., 16:85-93 (1989).
Jp Faber et al., “Computerized Interactive Orthodontic Treatment Planning,” Am. J. Orthod., 73(1):36-46 (Jan. 1978).
Kamada et.al., Case Reports on Tooth Positioners Using LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber, J. Nihon University School of Dentistry (1984) 26(1): 11-29.
Kamada et.al., Construction of Tooth Positioners with LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber and Some Case KJ Reports, J. Nihon University School of Dentistry (1982) 24(1):1-27.
Kanazawa et al., “Three-Dimensional Measurements of the Occlusal Surfaces of Upper Molars in a Dutch Population,” J. Dent Res., 63(11):1298-1301 (Nov. 1984).
Kesling, Coordinating the Predetermined Pattern and Tooth Positioner with Conventional Treatment, KN Am. J. Orthod. Oral Surg. (1946) 32:285-293.
Kesling et al., The Philosophy of the Tooth Positioning Appliance, American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral surgery. 1945; 31:297-304.
Kleeman et al., The Speed Positioner, J. Clin. Orthod. (1996) 30:673-680.
Kochanek, “Interpolating Splines with Local Tension, Continuity and Bias Control,” Computer Graphics, ri 18(3):33-41 (Jul. 1984). KM Oral Surgery (1945) 31 :297-30.
Kunii et al., “Articulation Simulation for an Intelligent Dental Care System,” Displays 15:181-188 (1994).
Kuroda et al., Three-Dimensional Dental Cast Analyzing System Using Laser Scanning, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. (1996) 110:365-369.
Laurendeau, et al., “A Computer-Vision Technique for the Acquisition and Processing of 3-D Profiles of 7 KR Dental Imprints: An Application in Orthodontics,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 10(3):453-461 (Sep. 1991.
Leinfelder, et al., “A New Method for Generating Ceramic Restorations: a CAD-CAM System,” J. Am. 1-1 Dent. Assoc., 118(6):703-707 (Jun. 1989).
Manetti, et al., “Computer-Aided Cefalometry and New Mechanics in Orthodontics,” (Article Summary in English, article in German), Fortschr Kieferorthop. 44, 370-376 (Nr. 5), 1983.
McCann, “Inside the ADA,” J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 118:286-294 (Mar. 1989).
McNamara et al., “Invisible Retainers,” J. Cfin. Orthod., pp. 570-578 (Aug. 1985).
McNamara et al., Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatment in the Mixed Dentition, Needham Press, pp. 347-353 (Jan. 1993).
Moermann et al., “Computer Machined Adhesive Porcelain Inlays: Margin Adaptation after Fatigue Stress,” IADR Abstract 339, J. Dent. Res., 66(a):763 (1987).
Moles, “Correcting Mild Malalignments—As Easy As One, Two, Three,” AOA/PRO Corner, vol. 11, No. 1, 2 pp. (2002).
Mormann et al., “Marginale Adaptation von adhasuven Porzellaninlays in vitro,” Separatdruck aus: Schweiz. Mschr. Zahnmed. 95: 1118-1129, 1985.
Nahoum, “The Vacuum Formed Dental Contour Appliance,” N. Y. State Dent. J., 30(9):385-390 (Nov. 1964).
Nash, “CEREC CAD/CAM Inlays: Aesthetics and Durability in a Single Appointment,” Dent. Today, 9(8):20, 22-23 (Oct. 1990).
Nishiyama et al., “A New Construction of Tooth Repositioner by LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber,” J. Nihon Univ. Sch. Dent., 19(2):93-102 (1977).
Paul et al., “Digital Documentation of Individual Human Jaw and Tooth Forms for Applications in Orthodontics, Oral Surgery and Forensic Medicine” Proc. of the 24th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON '98), Sep. 4, 1998, pp. 2415-2418.
Pinkham, “Foolish Concept Propels Technology,” Dentist, 3 pages total, Jan./Feb. 1989.
Pinkham, “Inventors CAD/CAM May Transform Dentistry,” Dentist, 3 pages total, Sep. 1990.
Ponitz, “Invisible Retainers,” Am. J. Orthod., 59(3):266-272 (Mar. 1971).
Procera Research Projects, “Procera Research Projects 1993—Abstract Collection,” pp. 3-7; 28 (1993).
Proffit et al., Contemporary Orthodontics, (Second Ed.), Chapter 15, Mosby Inc., pp. 470-533 (Oct. 1993.
Raintree Essix & ARS Materials, Inc., Raintree Essix, Technical Magazine Table of contents and Essix Appliances,<http:// www.essix.com/magazine/defaulthtml> Aug. 13, 1997.
Redmond et al., “Clinical Implications of Digital Orthodontics,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 117(2):240-242 (2000).
Rekow, “A Review of the Developments in Dental CAD/CAM Systems,” (contains references to Japanese efforts and content of the papers of particular interest to the clinician are indicated with a one line summary of their content in the bibliography), Curr. Opin. Dent., 2:25-33 (Jun. 1992).
Rekow, “CAD/CAM in Dentistry: A Historical Perspective and View of the Future,” J. Can. Dent. Assoc., 58(4):283, 287-288 (Apr. 1992).
Rekow, “Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Dentistry: A Review of the State of the Art,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 58(4):512-516 (Oct. 1987).
Rekow, “Dental CAD-CAM Systems: What is the State of the Art?”, J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 122:43-48 1991.
Rekow et a/., “CAD/CAM for Dental Restorations—Some of the Curious Challenges,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 38(4):344-345 (Apr. 1991.
Rekow et al., “Comparison of Three Data Acquisition Techniques for 3-D Tooth Surface Mapping,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 13(1):344-345 1991.
Rekow, “Feasibility of an Automated System for Production of Dental Restorations, Ph.D. Thesis,” Univ. of Minnesota, 244 pages total, Nov. 1988.
Richmond et al., “The Development of a 3D Cast Analysis System,” Br. J. Orthod., 13(1):53-54 (Jan. 1986).
Richmond et al., “The Development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): Reliability and Validity,” Eur. J. Orthod., 14:125-139 (1992).
Richmond, “Recording The Dental Cast in Three Dimensions,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92(3):199-206 (Sep. 1987).
Rudge, “Dental Arch Analysis: Arch Form, A Review of the Literature,” Eur. J. Orthod., 3(4):279-284 1981.
Sakuda et al., “Integrated Information-Processing System in Clinical Orthodontics: An Approach with Use of a Computer Network System,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 101(3): 210-220 (Mar. 1992).
Schellhas et al., “Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Surgical Planning,” Arch. Otolamp!. Head Neck Sur9., 114:438-442 (Apr. 1988).
Schroeder et al., Eds. The Visual Toolkit, Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey (1998) Chapters 6, 8 & 9, (pp. 153-210,309-354, and 355-428, respectively.
Shilliday, (1971). Minimizing finishing problems with the mini-positioner, Am. J. Orthod. 59:596-599.
Sinclair, “The Readers' Corner,” J. Clin. Orthod., 26(6):369-372 (Jun. 1992).
Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, Cerec 3D, Manuel utiiisateur, Version 2.0X (in French), 2003,114 pages total.
Stoll et al., “Computer-aided Technologies in Dentistry,” (article summary in English, article in German), Dtsch Zahna'rztl Z 45, pp. 314-322 (1990).
Sturman, “Interactive Keyframe Animation of 3-D Articulated Models,” Proceedings Graphics Interface '84, May-Jun. 1984, pp. 35-40.
The Choice Is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee HI Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product information for doctors. http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/doctorhtml>, 5 pages (May 19, 2003).
The Choice is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee HJ Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product information for patients,<http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/patients.html>, 2 pages (May 19, 2003).
The Choice Is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product information, 6 pages (2003).
The Red, White & Blue Way to Improve Your Smile! Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product information for patients, 2 pages 1992.
Truax L., “Truax Clasp-Less(TM) Appliance System,” Funct. Orthod., 9(5):22-4, 26-8 (Sep.-Oct. 1992).
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, “Automated Crown Replication Using Solid Photography SM,” Solid Photography Inc., Melville NY, Oct. 1977, 20 pages total.
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, “Holodontography: An Introduction to Dental Laser Holography,” School of Aerospace Medicine Brooks AFB Tex, Mar. 1973, 37 pages total.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/050,342, filed Jun. 20, 1997, 41 pages total.
Van Der Linden, “A New Method to Determine Tooth Positions and Dental Arch Dimensions,” J. Dent. Res., 51(4):1104 (Jul.-Aug. 1972).
Van Der Linden et al., “Three-Dimensional Analysis of Dental Casts by Means of the Optocom,” J. Dent. Res., p. 1100 (Jul.-Aug. 1972).
Van Der Zel, “Ceramic-Fused-to-Metal Restorations with a New CAD/CAM System,” Quintessence Int., 24(11):769-778 (1993.
Varady et al., “Reverse Engineering Of Geometric Models—An Introduction,” Computer-Aided Design, 29(4):255-268,1997.
Verstreken et al., “An Image-Guided Planning System for Endosseous Oral Implants,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 17(5):842-852 (Oct. 1998).
Warunek et al., Physical and Mechanical Properties of Elastomers in Orthodonic Positioners, Am J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop, vol. 95, No. 5, (May 1989) pp. 399-400.
Warunek et.al., Clinical Use of Silicone Elastomer Applicances, JCO (1989) XXIII(10):694-700.
Wells, Application of the Positioner Appliance in Orthodontic Treatment, Am. J. Orthodont. (1970) 58:351-366.
Williams, “Dentistry and CAD/CAM: Another French Revolution,” J. Dent. Practice Admin., pp. 2-5 (Jan./Mar. 1987).
Williams, “The Switzerland and Minnesota Developments in CAD/CAM,” J. Dent. Practice Admin., pp. 50-55 (Apr./Jun. 1987.
WSCG'98—Conference Program, “The Sixth International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics and Visualization '98,” Feb. 9-13, 1998, pp. 1-7, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, URL<http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/wscg98.h>.
Xia et al., “Three-Dimensional Virtual-Reality Surgical Planning and Soft-Tissue Prediction for Orthognathic Surgery,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., 5(2):97-107 (Jun. 2001).
Yamamoto et al., “Optical Measurement of Dental Cast Profile and Application to Analysis of Three-Dimensional Tooth Movement in Orthodontics,” Front. Med. Biol. Eng., 1(2):119-130 (1988).
Yamamoto et al., “Three-Dimensional Measurement of Dental Cast Profiles and Its Applications to Orthodontics,” Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 12(5):2051-2053 (1990).
Yamany et al., “A System for Human Jaw Modeling Using Intra-Oral Images,” Proc. of the 20th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Nov. 1, 1998, vol. 2, pp. 563-566.
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); I. The D.P. Concept and Implementation of Transparent Silicone Resin (Orthocon),” Nippon Dental Review, 452:61-74 (Jun. 1980).
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); II. The D.P. Manufacturing Procedure and Clinical Applications,” Nippon Dental Review, 454:107-130 (Aug. 1980).
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); III. The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 1, Dental and Functional Reversed Occlusion Case Reports,” Nippon Dental Review, 457:146-164 (Nov. 1980).
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); III.—The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 2. Skeletal Reversed Occlusion Case Reports,” Nippon Dental Review, 458:112-129 (Dec. 1980).
Andrews, The Six Keys to Optimal Occlusion Straight Wire, Chapter 3, pp. 13-24 (1989).
Biostar Opeation & Training Manual. Great Lakes Orthodontics, Ltd. 199 Fire Tower Drive, Tonawanda, New York. 14150-5890, 20 pages total (1990).
Dentrac Corporation, Dentrac document, pp. 4-13 (1992).
DuraClearTM product information, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab, 1 page (1997).
Rekow et al., “CAD/CAM for Dental Restorations—Some of the Curious Challenges,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 38(4):314-318 (Apr. 1991).
Siemens, “CEREC—Computer-Reconstruction,” High Tech in der Zahnmedizin, 14 pages total (2004).
Tru-Tain Orthodontic & Dental Supplies, Product Brochure, Rochester, Minnesota 55902, 16 pages total (1996).
Wishan, “New Advances in Personal Computer Applications for Cephalometric Analysis, Growth Prediction, Surgical Treatment Planning and Imaging Processing,” Symposium: Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxilofacial Surgery Presented on Sep. 13, 1990.
You May Be a Candidate for This Invisible No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product information for patients, 2 pages (2002).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170312052 A1 Nov 2017 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12338307 Dec 2008 US
Child 13846322 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13846322 Mar 2013 US
Child 15650548 US