The present invention is directed to an apparatus for forming a sonic noise alert pattern (SNAP) in the surface of the road, and in particular, to a high speed grinder for forming a series of spaced apart sinusoidal depressions in pavement.
Rumble strips or sonic noise alert pattern (SNAP) depressions in the surface of the road are well known and widely referred to as rumble strips. Such depressions generate an easily heard noise when a vehicle tire drives over such a stretch of pavement. In addition, vibration is usually passed to the driver and passengers of the vehicle, alerting them that they have passed over such a pattern of depressions. Such SNAP depressions are often placed at the side of the road on the shoulder or along the centerline of two lane roads to alert a driver that the vehicle has veered off the driving lane, as may happen when drivers fall asleep at the wheel. In addition, rumble strips are placed across the width of the lanes of the road to alert the driver that he/she is approaching a stop or reduced speed limit and to slow down in anticipation of the upcoming reduced speed or stop.
It can be appreciated that forming such depressions in the road typically requires a grinding device that must rise and fall in a predetermined cycle to create a series of substantially evenly spaced apart depressions. For very hard pavement surfaces, such as concrete surfaces, the power required is substantial in order to form the depressions. The speed of forming such depressions is generally quite slow, on the order of a several hundred feet per minute. When miles of such SNAP depressions must be formed in the road, the work can be a very time consuming process. In addition to the time required, the costs become substantial for a crew and the grinding equipment. Besides the costs of forming the strips, the inconvenience to drivers using the road, including lane closures, can be substantial, causing severe traffic delays.
A known device for forming such strips is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,499,809. This patent shows a device and method for making SNAP depressions in the surface of pavement. The pavement grinder has a grinding arbor supported on transverse parallel shafts with an offset to produce an up and down reciprocal motion to raise and lower the grinding carriage and form depressions in the pavement.
Another device for cutting depressions in the road is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,297,894, to Yenick. The Yenick patent shows a pivotally mounted cutting head with a pair of guide wheels and a cam at the rear of the cutting device to raise and lower the cutting head. The cam includes a chain arrangement to raise and lower the cutting head to the proper depth. However, the pivoting arrangement does not provide sufficient power or speed for the cutting head for some applications. The Yenick device requires the cutting head to follow a cam member with a wheel engaging the outer periphery of the cam.
Although rumble strips have proven effective at alerting drivers when their vehicles is drifting from the driving lane, the noise generated may be too loud and may be a nuisance to those close to the rumble strips. In some cases, rumble strips have been filled in to deal with the excessive noise. However, this eliminates the safety benefits provided by the rumble strips. Much of the noise is due to the wheel entering and leaving each depression as typical depressions do not have a gradual transition to and from the road surface.
In an effort to provide a satisfactory warning to drivers while producing less noise than conventional rumble strips, warning strips that still produce a vibration at a lower noise volume have been developed. Such quieter patterns, referred to as mumble strips, may be placed in the same locations as conventional rumble strips and produce a vibration and noise, but are quieter when vehicles pass over the patterns. To produce less noise, the mumble strips are formed by recesses with a more gradual entry and exit transition for each recess. The pattern of recesses therefore takes on a continuous sinusoidal pattern. Such a pattern eliminates sharp edges that may be formed at the entry into and exit from each recess, resulting in a quieter pattern, but still providing sufficient warning to drivers. It can be appreciated that grinding such a pattern requires a gradual engagement and disengagement of the grinding head rather than a plunge cut and may be difficult to obtain.
It can be seen then, that a new and improved method and apparatus for cutting evenly spaced apart sinusoidal depressions in the surface of pavement to form a sonic noise alert pattern is needed. Such a grinding device should provide for directly lowering and raising the cutting head in a continuous repeating pattern with a gradual entry and exit to and from each recess. A grinder should have a simple and reliable construction that provides sufficient power and direct support for raising and lowering the cutting head in a predetermined pattern at sufficient speed to cut even hard pavement material at speeds of over one mile per hour. The present invention addresses these as well as other problems associated with cutting a series of sonic noise alert pattern depressions in the surface of the pavement.
The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for forming rumble strips, also known as Sonic Noise Alert Pattern (SNAP) depressions in the surface of the road. In particular the present invention relates to an apparatus and method for quieter reduced volume rumble strips, sometimes referred to as mumble strips.
The grinding apparatus includes a truck chassis that supports a grinding carriage on its own movable frame. The grinding carriage has a cutting assembly that can be moved between a raised travel position and a lowered cutting position. The cutting assembly includes an arbor which includes carbide teeth mounted along and around the arbor. The width of depressions ground in the pavement is variable depending on the number and arrangement of the teeth mounted on the arbor. The arbor mounts to the grinding carriage of the cutting assembly. The grinding carriage includes motors and a drive train to drive the arbor and may include belts, chains or may have motors directly mounted to the arbor shaft. The cutting assembly may also include a cooling system typically providing cooling water for the arbor to prevent the cutting teeth from overheating and to control dust. The grinding carriage has a control wheel that is coupled to the arbor to control up and down motion of the arbor.
The grinding carriage mounts to the rear of a chassis, such as a truck chassis, on a support assembly that provides for adjusting the lateral position of the grinding carriage relative to the chassis. With such adjustment the chassis can be driven in a safe and efficient position on a road that minimizes traffic disruption, keeps the pavement grinder in a safe path of travel, allows the driver to view the grinding carriage operate and keeps the arbor cutting a pattern at the correct location on the pavement.
The control wheel is a non-round wheel formed by a tire mounted on a rim. The tire is a solid element and made of compound having minimal to low compression even when subjected to the forces associated with pavement grinding. The periphery of the tire is non-round and the diameter varies in an undulating repeated pattern. The pattern is sinusoidal and wraps around the periphery of the tire. In one embodiment, the tire forms three lobes of maximum diameter. The lobes alternate with three depressions of minimum diameter. The areas between the lobes and the depressions gradually transition in the sinusoidal pattern. In the embodiment shown, the diameter varies one quarter inch, between twelve and three-quarter inches at the depressions and thirteen inches at the maximum height of the lobes. The distance between adjacent depressions, which is also the distance between the peaks of the lobes, is fourteen and one-half inches. As the depressions and the lobes are evenly spaced about the periphery of the tire, the distance between any two lobes and the distance between any two depressions is the same fourteen and one-half inches.
In use the control wheel controls the up and down movement of the cutting assembly and the depth with which the arbor grinds. The control wheel has a non-circular outer periphery with increasing and decreasing diameter around the wheel in an evenly spaced pattern. The control wheel has lobes of increased diameter alternates with three depressions of decreased diameter. The outer periphery gradually transitions from the depressions to the lobes. The gradual increase and decrease follows a sinusoidal pattern extending around the periphery of the control wheel. The varying diameter causes the center axis, and therefore the axle, of the control wheel to rise and fall. The control wheel axle rises relative to the ground when one of lobes is in contact with the ground surface while the axle lowers when one of the depressions engages the ground. The height of the axis of rotation rises and falls as the control wheel contact point transitions between the maximum at the apex of the lobes and the trough at the bottom of the depressions.
The cutting assembly is coupled to the control wheel so that the elevation of the arbor rises and falls with the height of the axle of the control wheel. The arbor also rises and falls in a sinusoidal pattern matching the pattern on the control wheel. The rising and falling causes the arbor to grind a sinusoidal pattern in the pavement.
In operation, when one of the lobes is engaging the ground, the arbor is raised. As the grinder advances and the control wheel rolls along the ground, the control wheel is supported on a portion of its periphery transitioning between the maximum diameter of a lobe and the bottom of a depression on the control wheel. At this position, the arbor is lowered slightly to grind at a shallow depth in the pavement. Further advancement of the grinder and rotation of the control wheel takes the cutting assembly to a position in which one of the depressions of the control wheel engages the ground and the grinding arbor descends to its greatest depth into the pavement. This forms the bottom of a depression in the pavement of a sonic noise alert pattern. As the grinder advances further and the control wheel continues to roll along the ground, the cutting assembly again attains an intermediate position between fully raised and fully lowered. Further advancement moves the control wheel and arbor to a configuration with the next lobe contacting the pavement and the arbor raised. As the grinder advances, the pattern repeats and an evenly spaced sinusoidal pattern is formed in the pavement. The transitions between the pavement surface and the bottom of a depression formed in the pavement are gradual and the sinusoidal pattern formed is quieter when driven over by vehicle tires as compared to conventional sonic noise alert patterns.
These features of novelty and various other advantages which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed hereto and forming a part hereof. However, for a better understanding of the invention, its advantages, and the objects obtained by its use, reference should be made to the drawings which form a further part hereof, and to the accompanying descriptive matter, in which there is illustrated and described a preferred embodiment of the invention.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals and letters indicate corresponding structure throughout the several views:
Referring to the drawings and in particular to
The cutting assembly 120 includes an arbor 122, shown in
The grinding carriage 130 is mounted to the rear of the chassis 102 on a support assembly 136. As shown in
Referring to
As shown in
Referring to
As the cutting assembly 120 is coupled to the control wheel 150, the height of the arbor rises and falls with the height of the axle of the control wheel 150, the arbor 122 also rises and falls in a sinusoidal pattern. The rising and falling causes the arbor to grind a sinusoidal pattern. Such a sonic noise alert pattern is shown in
As shown in
It is to be understood, however, that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of the invention, the disclosure is illustrative only, and the changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of shape, size and arrangement of parts within the principles of the invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
193171 | McRae | Jul 1877 | A |
894269 | Hendron | Jul 1908 | A |
995974 | Lewis | Jun 1911 | A |
1791668 | Fox et al. | Feb 1931 | A |
2244742 | Tyson | Jun 1941 | A |
2502043 | Howard | Mar 1950 | A |
2574090 | Dofsen | Nov 1951 | A |
2791442 | Lee et al. | May 1957 | A |
2826128 | Summers | Mar 1958 | A |
3094046 | Zipelius | Jun 1963 | A |
3104600 | White | Sep 1963 | A |
3212240 | Streete | Oct 1965 | A |
3407005 | Simms et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3529517 | Liddle et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3572842 | Mori | Mar 1971 | A |
3605579 | Heltzel | Sep 1971 | A |
3612611 | Ellis | Oct 1971 | A |
3649071 | Graff | Mar 1972 | A |
3662658 | Berrange | May 1972 | A |
3702093 | Van de Loock et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3767264 | Eckey | Oct 1973 | A |
3788704 | Staab | Jan 1974 | A |
3801211 | Perkins | Apr 1974 | A |
3868146 | Ellis | Feb 1975 | A |
3874806 | Grist et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3901553 | Binger et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3929377 | Weaver et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3950110 | Clifford | Apr 1976 | A |
4067398 | Franzen et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4147448 | Jeffery | Apr 1979 | A |
4174184 | Heenan | Nov 1979 | A |
4346766 | Manten | Aug 1982 | A |
4392689 | Moore et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4422795 | Berrange | Dec 1983 | A |
4493584 | Guntert | Jan 1985 | A |
4516808 | Staab et al. | May 1985 | A |
4575278 | Whitney | Mar 1986 | A |
4623277 | Wayne et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4701069 | Whitney | Oct 1987 | A |
4764051 | Whitney | Aug 1988 | A |
4792190 | Bertrand | Dec 1988 | A |
4878713 | Zanetis | Nov 1989 | A |
4885012 | Thompson | Dec 1989 | A |
4900094 | Sergeant | Feb 1990 | A |
4909575 | Lupton | Mar 1990 | A |
4986604 | Meister | Jan 1991 | A |
5078540 | Jakob et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5083839 | Younger | Jan 1992 | A |
5092658 | Smith | Mar 1992 | A |
5094565 | Johnson | Mar 1992 | A |
5114269 | Shepherd | May 1992 | A |
5190398 | Swisher | Mar 1993 | A |
5192160 | Muehlstaedter | Mar 1993 | A |
5215071 | Mertes et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5297894 | Yenick | Mar 1994 | A |
5354146 | O'Konek | Oct 1994 | A |
5391017 | Thomas et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5415495 | Johnson | May 1995 | A |
5484228 | Thomas | Jan 1996 | A |
5492431 | Rasmussen et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5582490 | Murray | Dec 1996 | A |
5607255 | Thomas et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5676490 | Nelson | Oct 1997 | A |
5857453 | Caven et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860764 | Roberts | Jan 1999 | A |
6004076 | Cook | Dec 1999 | A |
6116599 | Kaczmarski et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6206478 | Uehara et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210071 | McSharry | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220783 | Maxwell | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6364419 | Cannizzo et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379081 | Barbulescu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6454490 | Murphy | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6499809 | O'Konek | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505995 | Sanfilippo et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6547484 | Murphy | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6565282 | Gray | May 2003 | B1 |
6612773 | Gray | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6755482 | Johnson | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6843535 | Thomas | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6843615 | Cook | Jan 2005 | B1 |
7029072 | Murray | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7029370 | Cochran et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7073975 | Kraemer | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7168886 | Loader | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7325881 | Cochran et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
RE40505 | Murphy | Sep 2008 | E |
7625152 | Swamidass | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7731448 | Fillie | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7798158 | Crocker | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7837276 | Kraemer et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8025342 | Kraemer et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8491219 | Abresch et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8821063 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
D727975 | Brockway | Apr 2015 | S |
D727976 | Brockway | Apr 2015 | S |
9574310 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
20020176746 | Murphy | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020192025 | Johnson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040005190 | Jakits | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20150086268 | Johnson | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160053446 | Killion | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 209 743 | Sep 1973 | DE |
32 00 862 | Jul 1983 | DE |
0 283 286 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0 298 682 | Jan 1989 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Affidavit of Glenn Shed, 2 pages (executed Feb. 27, 2002). |
Statement of Jeff Arnswald, 2 pages (executed Mar. 5, 2002). |
“Devices to Prevent Run-Off-Road Accidents”, California State Department of Transportation, Sacramento Transportation Lab, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 61 pages (Feb. 1976). |
International Grooving and Grinding Association brochure entitled, “Grooved Runways are Safer . . . Ground Runways are Easier on Aircraft”, 8 pages (Apr. 1989). |
International Grooving and Grinding Association brochure entitled, “Grooving & Grinding are Cost Effective Ways to Restore Pavement Surfaces”, 4 pages (prior art at least as early as Jul. 16, 1998). |
Target RTM PRM 3804 brochure, 2 pages (prior art at least as early as Jul. 16, 1998). |
Target Safetrac Systems Rebuilding America's Infrasu ucture flyer, 2 pages (prior art at least as early as Jul. 16, 1998). |
Cushion Cut PC-5000 Highway Grinder brochure, 4 pages (prior art at least as early as Jul. 16, 1998). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190382969 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62281624 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15411525 | Jan 2017 | US |
Child | 16228138 | US |