The present invention relates generally to image projection systems and, more particularly (although not necessarily exclusively), to projection systems for compensating for image distortion.
In stereoscopic planetarium projection, two approaches have been pursued: (1) a rectangular “inset” image is projected in the front of a dome by a single projector or a pair of left eye/right eye perspective image projectors located behind the audience, near the edge of the dome and (2) multiple projectors, located near the edge of the dome, project an edge-blended image that covers the whole or most of the dome, often with blend zones in the central areas of interest in the projected image.
An inset image may not take full advantage of the immersive nature of a projection dome. On the other hand, edge blended systems with multiple projectors at multiple locations can be complicated to install and maintain well aligned.
Therefore, a single projector system or dual left eye/right eye perspective projector system where the projector(s) are located behind the audience in the rear of the dome, and illuminate(s) a large enough section of the dome to create an immersive, “frameless” feeling is desirable.
Further, it is desirable to use standard cinema components, including standard cinema three-dimensional (3D) glasses and 3D glasses handling equipment, in order to keep operational costs down.
Certain aspects and features relate to reducing chromatic aberration and allowing extreme projection angles in a projection system.
In one embodiment, a method of digitally projecting images includes light using image data to produce imaged light that includes a first wavelength band of light associated with a first primary color and a second wavelength band of light associated with a second primary color. An optical distorting element causes the light of the first wavelength band of light to spread angularly from the light of the second wavelength band of light when displaying the imaged light onto a screen. A warping processor modifies the image data for light of the first wavelength band of light to cause the imaged light of the first wavelength band of light exiting the optical distorting element to converge onto the screen with imaged light of the second wavelength band of light exiting the optical distorting element.
In another embodiment, a system for digitally projecting images includes a digital projector, a projection lens, a single prism anamorphic adaptor, and a color warping processor. The digital projector is configured to project imaged light modified by image data. The imaged light has light of a first wavelength band of light associated with a first primary color and light of a second wavelength band of light associated with a second primary color. The projection lens is adapted to project the imaged light. The single prism anamorphic adaptor is at the output of the projection lens and through which the imaged light is configured to be projected for display on a screen. The single prism anamorphic adaptor is configured for causing angular color separation between light of the first wavelength band of light and light of the second wavelength band of light. The color warping processor is adapted for modifying the image data to cause the light of the first wavelength band of light of the imaged light exiting the single prism anamorphic to converge on the screen with the light of the second wavelength band of light of the imaged light exiting the single prism anamorphic adaptor.
In another embodiment, a screen includes a dome-shaped surface on which imaged light, representing digital images and including a first wavelength band of light associated with a first primary color and a second wavelength band of light associated with a second primary color, is displayable such that the first wavelength band of light of imaged light converges on the dome-shaped surface with the light of the second wavelength band of light from a projection system that includes an optical distorting element configured for causing angular color separation between the light of the first wavelength band of light and the light of the second wavelength band of light.
These illustrative aspects and features are mentioned not to limit or define the invention, but to provide examples to aid understanding of the inventive concepts disclosed in this disclosure. Other aspects, advantages, and features of the present invention will become apparent after review of the entire disclosure.
A configuration according to one aspect may further include an electronic image warping system 5 that can perform a geometric correction of the images being input to the projector 1 so that a technician can calibrate the projected images for a best possible experience compromise for the viewers located in different seats, including maintaining an essentially straight horizon for as many viewers as possible. This process may compensate for both distortion in the projection objective and the distortion caused by viewing the projected images off of the projection axis.
The projector 1 may include a spectrum separation stereoscopic system that can cause the spectrum of the emitted light from the projector 1 to have essentially discrete and narrow red, green and blue wavelength bands, and the audience may wear 3D glasses with spectrum separation filters. The spectrum separation system may include a rotating filter wheel that may filter transmitted light alternately between two spectra, a static filter, a solid state alternating filter or a laser illumination system with a static or alternating light spectrum.
The image warping system 5 may be capable of performing separate geometric corrections for each of the primary colors, allowing the technician to adjust the color convergence calibration of the red, green and blue image planes, for example by using a white calibration grid, thereby reducing the visual blurring caused by chromatic aberration in the prime lens 4 and in the anamorphic adaptor. When the spectrum separation stereoscopic system is used, and the emitted spectrum therefore consists of narrow red, green and blue wavelength bands, it may be possible by the convergence calibration to reduce the blurring by chromatic aberration effectively. This, in turn, can reduce the need to use optical means in the prime lens 4 and the anamorphic adaptor to compensate for chromatic aberration.
In a configuration of the first aspect, the spectrum separation stereoscopic system can alternate the emitted spectrum between a first spectrum and a second spectrum. The image generator 3 can output alternately left eye and right eye perspective images and the image warping system 5 can alternate synchronously between a first color convergence calibration and a second color convergence calibration. Two separate color convergence calibrations can be adjusted by the technician. This may be done, for example, as follows: 1) a white grid is projected as the left eye image, a black image is projected as the right eye image, and the red and blue geometry is calibrated until the best possible color convergence, 2) a green grid is projected as both left and right eye perspective images and the green geometry of the second color convergence is calibrated to the best possible convergence between the two spectra of green, 3) a red grid is projected as both left and right eye perspective images and the red geometry of the second color convergence is calibrated to the best possible convergence between the two spectra of red, 4) a blue grid is projected as both left and right eye perspective images and the blue geometry of the second color convergence is calibrated to the best possible convergence between the two spectra of blue. This way all six wavelength bands (red, green and blue of the first and second spectrum) are converged such that, if identical images are fed as left eye perspective and right eye perspective image, a monoscopic image can be observed without eyewear, in which the aberration is reduced. The color convergence calibrations may be stored as separate geometry corrections that can be performed after a general geometry correction is performed that is calibrated for best experience compromise (i.e. straight horizon etc.). The performance of those two successive geometry corrections may be performed such that the resulting geometry correction for each of the six wavelength bands is first computed, then the color planes are resampled to avoid successive resamplings and the associated quality loss.
In an alternative configuration shown in
In
After selecting a new prism and/or adjusting the angle, both the general geometry calibration for best experience and the color convergence can be performed again. In one configuration, a link can be established between the selection and adjustment of prisms such that the geometrical corrections can follow the selected prism and angle. For example, sensors may sense the selected prism and angle and send information data to the warping system 5, which can select a relevant pre-calibrated geometry correction. Alternatively, a servo system may adjust the prism angle. The servo system and the warping system can be operated and synchronized by a control system.
The projector 1 may be a 3 chip 4K DLP™ cinema projector with 1.38″ DMD chips, for example a Christie CP4230 or a Barco DP4K. The prime lens 4 may be a fisheye objective with a focal length of app. 15 mm and an f# of 2.4. The aperture of the objective may be larger than that of some of the individual lens elements, which may increase brightness at the center (vignetting) and reduce brightness relatively in peripheral vision areas, hence reduce cross reflections in the dome. The spectrum separation stereoscopic system may be a Dolby™ 3D, Panavision 3D or Infitec alternating filter wheel or non-alternating filter. The warping system may be the geometry functions included in the 7th Sense “Delta” media server. The anamorphic adaptor may consist of a single triangular prism with an angle of 10 degrees located in front of the prime lens with an adjustable vertical angle and the thinner edge facing down. The vertical angle may be adjusted depending on how big a fraction of the dome is desired to be covered with projected image, and may for example be set to 25 degrees. For example, a prism can be n-BK7 glass with a wedge angle of 8.7 degrees and can produce a 33% image stretch in one direction.
When significant image stretches (e.g. a 33% vertical image stretch) are used, the selected prism may cause significant angular color separation as the light exits the prism. Even though the position of convergence of light from each color channel can be adjusted by image warping unit 5 in
For example, each projected image pixel that is stretched by the single prism anamorphic adaptor and displayed on a screen can include three separate color pixel images to form a pixel image on the screen. Each color channel can have a bandwidth of wavelengths of light. The bandwidth of wavelengths of light for one color can converge on the space of one pixel on the screen. If the prism separates color to a greater extreme, the light associated with a color channel may spread out further angularly when exiting the prism, causing the displayed pixel to become fatter. The fatter the pixel becomes for each color pixel, blur can become apparent to a viewer, which is undesirable. The wider the wavelength bandwidth of light of one color entering a single prism, the greater the angular spread of the light exiting the prism and the fatter the pixel. When the wavelength bandwidth of light of one color channel is reduced, there may be less angular spread of the light exiting the prism. Since image warping unit 5 is not able to compensate for Pixel blur, other solutions may be needed. Using a second prism in series with the first prism to compensate for color separation can be done, but the second prism may be large and not a practical option. An alternate solution may be to adjust or reduce the bandwidth of the wavelengths of light for each color channel. However, the tradeoff can mean losing more light for the displayed image. Projection systems may use wideband light sources where color channels are created by color separating optical elements, such as a Philip's prism or color filters such as in a rotating color wheel. There can be a diminishing return between stretching the image with a single prism and image brightness to maintain image quality. For projection systems that rely on wideband light sources, further narrowing of the bandwidth for each color can be done but may not be an acceptable solution when further stretching of an image is performed. Another approach is to use very narrow band light sources, such as laser light sources in a projection system, with a single prism anamorphic projection adaptor. The laser source can have a very narrow bandwidth of wavelengths of light that can be used with a single prism element in combination with the warping unit 5 to correct for color shift on the display. A laser-based system can extend the stretch capability of the single prism element and the warping unit can compensate for the extra image color shift between color channels when displaying a stretched image.
For example, lasers with a +/−1 nanometer wavelength bandwidth about the center frequency can be used with a single prism anamorphic lens for virtually any amount of color separation and therefore any amount of image stretch. Another factor such as speckle can be considered when using very narrow band laser sources.
One potential disadvantage of very narrow band laser sources is the amount of light speckle that these sources produce. Light speckle from a laser light source may appear on a display as an undesirable visible image artifact. The amount of speckle that can be observed may increase as the light wavelength bandwidth of the laser decreases. One approach to reducing speckle can be to increase the bandwidth of wavelengths of the laser light source. However, increased bandwidth can lead to a fat pixel problem for an extreme image stretch when using a single prism anamorphic adaptor. The bandwidth of wavelength of the laser source used in an extreme image stretch may be based on a compromise between the amount of speckle produced and the degree a pixel becomes blurred or fattened.
In the application of 3D projection that is a spectrum separating stereoscopic system using spectral encoding of the left and right eye image, each projected image can have a different narrow bandwidth of wavelengths of red, green and blue light. The maximum bandwidth of wavelengths of two different bandwidths in the same color channel, one for each eye image, can be limited by the full range of the red or green or blue color spectrum considered acceptable for each color channel. For example, wavelength limits of a red color channel can be defined in terms of what is considered to produce an acceptable viewing result for red colored images. Within this bandwidth range, two narrower wavelength bandwidths with a center frequency wavelength can be defined with sufficient wavelength separation between the two center frequencies and associated bandwidth to prevent undesirable color channel crossover. If the maximum bandwidth is limited to 20 nanometers at each of the two center frequencies, the maximum pixel expansion of a fat pixel can be limited to within 66% with the example prism stated earlier. If a single prism anamorphic adaptor creates unacceptable fat pixel blur below the maximum bandwidth of each of the different bandwidths of wavelengths in the described 3D projection system, then bandwidth of the laser light source can be further limited. For example, the bandwidth of wavelengths of the laser light may be limited to less than 20 nanometers such as 10 nanometers to reduce the fat pixel further in the example above. When the pixel resolution of an image modulator, such as a spatial light modulator 10 of a projection system of
When a single prism increases the angular spread of wavelengths of light of each of the three colors in
In block 820, the wavelength bandwidth of light for one color channel is adjusted. In some aspects, the wavelength bandwidth is adjusted after an image is displayed using light that has been stretched using a single prism anamorphic adapted and modified in at least one color channel with image data. The light with the adjusted wavelength bandwidth can then be modified, stretched, and displayed again as described in the following section.
The bandwidth can be adjusted to work with a single prism anamorphic adaptor to achieve an optimum image stretch that would not be otherwise possible because of a fat pixel problem that color warping techniques may not be able to correct. Adjusting by reducing the bandwidth of light in a color channel can reduce the angular spread of light exiting a one prism anamorphic adaptor. Effectively, the fat pixel problem can be controlled. Examples of techniques for adjusting color channel bandwidth include adding a color filter, adding an adjustable color filter, having interchangeable color filters, and having interchangeable color wheel filters. An alternate approach can involve designing the light source to have light emissions with the needed wavelength bandwidth profile best suited for the single lens prism anamorphic adaptor to minimize a fat pixel problem. Another approach may be to use a source with as narrow as possible wavelength bandwidth of light for a color channel such as a laser source. A diode laser is an example of one such laser that can be used as a light source with a much reduced fat pixel problem.
In block 824, one color channel of the light is modified with image data to produce modified image light. Image data can be accessed in any number of ways such as from a server in the projection system, from a server that is remote with respect to the projection system, or it can be accessed remotely. Image data can be a feature presentation. An example of a device that can perform the modification is a spatial light modulator (SLM) 10 of
The image data in block 824 can also be modified image data that has been modified by a color warping processor. Image data can be warped to cause the imaged light from one color channel to converge on to the display screen with imaged light from another color channel. For example, the warping unit 5 in
In block 832, the projected image from a projection lens can be stretched by a single prism anamorphic adaptor. For example,
In block 836, the stretched image is displayed. In theatres images are displayed on projection surfaces or screens. For example, the stretched image can be displayed on a domed projection surface 2 in
In a second aspect of the invention, in the configurations of
While the present subject matter has been described in detail with respect to specific aspects and examples hereof, those skilled in the art, upon attaining an understanding of the foregoing may readily produce alterations to, variations of, and equivalents to such aspects and examples. Accordingly, it should be understood that the present disclosure has been presented for purposes of example rather than limitation, and does not preclude inclusion of such modifications, variations and/or additions to the present subject matter as would be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/351,816 titled “Reducing Angular Spread in Digital Image Projection,” filed Apr. 14, 2014, which is a U.S. national phase under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2012/055754 titled “Distortion Compensation for Image Projection,” filed Oct. 19, 2012, which claims benefit of priority under PCT Article 8 of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/549,601, titled “Stereoscopic Planetarium Projection,” filed Oct. 20, 2011, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4523226 | Lipton et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4868773 | Coyle et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5070403 | Wilkinson | Dec 1991 | A |
5384869 | Wilkinson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5561474 | Kojima et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5631975 | Bouchard et al. | May 1997 | A |
5654805 | Boon | Aug 1997 | A |
5663775 | Kawamura et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5920652 | Wilkinson | Jul 1999 | A |
6018596 | Wilkinson | Jan 2000 | A |
6128415 | Hultgren et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6222593 | Higurashi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6243070 | Hill et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6396505 | Lui et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6538705 | Higurashi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6552855 | Kowarz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6703988 | Fergason et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6733138 | Raskar | May 2004 | B2 |
6751006 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760075 | Mayer et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6804406 | Chen | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6843564 | Putilin et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6984043 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7002533 | Sayag | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7079157 | Deering | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7097311 | Jaynes et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111941 | Allen et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7127084 | Mauk | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7339625 | Matthys et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7357517 | Hasegawa | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7660470 | Yano | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676072 | Sugiyama | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7740361 | Jaynes et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7852327 | Chen et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7866832 | Jaynes et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7891818 | Christensen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7936361 | Aufranc et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7954954 | Aufranc et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8016426 | Artonne et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8453148 | Hobbs et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8567953 | O'Dor et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8842222 | Iversen | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8944612 | Chang et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20010024231 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020027608 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020196538 | Lantz | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040001184 | Gibbon et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040085256 | Hereld et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040184007 | Silverstein et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040239885 | Jaynes et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050036673 | Ohba et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050082990 | Elliott et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050083402 | Klose | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060033890 | Hasegawa | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060221249 | Lin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070024764 | Chung | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070091277 | Damera-Venkata et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070132965 | Damera-Venkata et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070133794 | Cloutier et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070171380 | Wright et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070285663 | Hewitt et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080101725 | Lin et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080143969 | Aufranc et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143978 | Damera-Venkata et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080266321 | Aufranc et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080297451 | Marcu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080309884 | O'Dor et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090027304 | Aufranc et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090102915 | Arsenich | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090213337 | Kondo et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090244684 | Gollier | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090273719 | Kuwata et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090278918 | Marcus et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100008568 | Curti et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100103379 | Fiess | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100177112 | Miyasaka et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100201682 | Quan et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110057943 | Ivashin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110199586 | Morikuni | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110234920 | Nelson | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110309999 | Chang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120127323 | Kasuya et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120176415 | Chao | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130093805 | Iversen | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130201403 | Iversen | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140192076 | Tan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140292817 | Iversen et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160165199 | Tan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1367883 | Sep 2002 | CN |
1417637 | May 2003 | CN |
1532586 | Sep 2004 | CN |
1598690 | Mar 2005 | CN |
1735173 | Feb 2006 | CN |
1846213 | Oct 2006 | CN |
1988674 | Jun 2007 | CN |
101180873 | May 2008 | CN |
101507286 | Aug 2009 | CN |
102123292 | Jul 2011 | CN |
2827622 | Jan 1980 | DE |
19545356 | May 1996 | DE |
899688 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1297488 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1460856 | Sep 2004 | EP |
08168039 | Jun 1996 | JP |
09046553 | Feb 1997 | JP |
09326981 | Dec 1997 | JP |
2000184317 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001051346 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2006054632 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006139057 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2008182706 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2008539675 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2009069818 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009206665 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2009260932 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2010039160 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2011040958 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2013531267 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2165192 | Apr 2001 | RU |
2168192 | May 2001 | RU |
9621171 | Jul 1996 | WO |
2004039085 | May 2004 | WO |
2006116536 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2010147451 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011134834 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2011160629 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2013024430 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013057714 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013057717 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Application No. 201280051370.7, Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2017, 3 pages of English translation and 8 pages of original document. |
European Application No. 12841614.6, Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2018, 12 pages. |
“XLM HD30—The ultimate high-brightness projector for high-resolution multi-windowing”, URL:http://www.projectorcentral.com/pdf/projector_spec_3403.pdf, XP55014864, Jul. 1, 2006, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/806,105, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2014, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/641,676, Final Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2014, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/641,676, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 10, 2014, 6 pages. |
*U.S. Appl. No. 14/351,816, “Non-Final Office Action”, dated Oct. 5, 2015, 12 pages. |
*U.S. Appl. No. 14/351,816, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Jul. 15, 2016, 10 pages. |
*U.S. Appl. No. 14/351,816, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Mar. 30, 2016, 9 pages. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 201280051370.7, “First Office Action”, dated Sep. 25, 2015, 14 pages (7 pages for the original document and 7 pages for the English translation). |
Chinese Patent Application No. 201280051370.7, “Second Office Action”, dated Jul. 12, 2016, 10 pages (5 pages for the English translation and 5 pages for the original document). |
Cotting et al., “Embedding Imperceptible Patterns into Projected Images for Simultaneous Acquisition and Display”, Proceedings of the third IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Nov. 2, 2004, pp. 100-109. |
European Patent Application No. 12841614.6, “Extended European Search Report”, dated Jul. 15, 2015, 13 pages. |
Jacobson et al., “Linear Fusion of Image Sets for Display”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, US, vol. 45, No. 10, XP011192516, ISSN: 0196-2892, DOI : 10.1109/TGRS . 2007 . 903598, Oct. 1, 2007, pp. 3277-3288. |
Li et al., “Optical blending for multi-projector display wall systems”, IEEE LEOS 12th Annual Meeting Conference Proceedings, Leos' 99, vol. 1, XPOI0361258, DOI : 10.1109/LEOS.1999.813592 ISBN : 978-0-7803-5634-4, Nov. 8, 1999, pp. 281-282. |
Mayer, “Design Considerations and Applications for Innovative Display Options Using Projector Arrays”, Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 2650, Jan. 1996, pp. 131-139. |
Okatani et al., “Study of Image Quality of Superimposed Projection Using Multiple Projectors”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, IEEE Service Center, vol. 18, No. 2, XP011249562, ISSN: 1057-7149, Feb. 2009, pp. 424-429. |
Paschotta, “Anamorphic Prism Pairs”, Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology, Oct. 2008, 2 pages. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2012/055754, “International Search Report & Written Opinion”, dated Feb. 19, 2013, 7 pages. |
Roth et al., “0.2: Wide Gamut, High Brightness Multiple Primaries Single Panel Projection Displays”, SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, vol. 34, Issue 1, May 1, 2003, pp. 118-121. |
Seo et al., “Double-Layer Projection Display System Using Scattering Polarizer Film”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 47, No. 3, XP55011651, ISSN: 0021-4922, DOI : 10.1143/JJAP. 47.1602, Mar. 2008, pp. 1602-1605. |
Zollmann et al., “Digital Illumination for Augmented Studios”, Journal of Virtual Reality and Broadcasting, Dec. 1, 2006, 10 pages. |
Zollmann et al., “Imperceptible Calibration for Radiometric Compensation”, Eurographics, Jan. 1, 2007, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170034488 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61549601 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14351816 | US | |
Child | 15292340 | US |