Reducing buffer usage for TCP proxy session based on delayed acknowledgement

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9979665
  • Patent Number
    9,979,665
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 9, 2016
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 22, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
Reducing buffer usage for a TCP proxy session between a client and a server by a service gateway includes: determining a first round trip time (RTT) for a server side TCP session and determining a second RTT for a client side TCP session; comparing the first RTT with the second RTT; determining whether the second RTT exceeds the first RTT beyond a threshold; if so, then calculating a desired RTT based on the second RTT; and setting a timer according to the calculated desired RTT, where a TCP acknowledgement for the server side TCP session is delayed until the timer expires. The desired RTT may be calculated as a percentage of the second RTT or as the second RTT minus a predetermined value. The service gateway waits until the timer has expired before sending a TCP acknowledgement data packet to the server.
Description
FIELD

The present invention relates generally to data communications, and more specifically, to a service gateway.


BACKGROUND

Many service gateways such as firewalls and server load balancers provide Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) proxy functionality for some time. Typical service applications of TCP proxy include network analysis, security, and traffic adaptation due to asymmetric client and server condition. A TCP proxy server typically allocates an amount of memory buffer to handle the data packet buffering of a TCP proxy session between a client device and a server. The memory buffer is used to handle data packet buffers for client side session and server side session. The allocation of memory space among the client side session send and receive buffers, and server side session send and receive buffers does not often take performance into consideration. A TCP proxy server receives a data packet from the server side session, processes the data packet according to the necessary service applications, and transmits the resulting data packet to the client side session. In an ideal scenario, these steps are completed before the next data packet from the server side session is delivered to the TCP proxy server. However, in many deployed situations, client devices access services through mobile broadband access or residual Internet access where such access has a longer transmission time due to long distance wide area network and a slower transmission bandwidth based on subscriber access services. Nevertheless, the TCP proxy server and the servers reside in a same data center, and enjoy short transmission time and high capacity bandwidth. In such deployment scenarios, when the TCP proxy server receives a data packet from the server side session, the received data packet is placed in the server side session receive buffer, and waits for its turn to be processed by the service applications, which in turn waits for the client side session to free up client side session sending buffer, which is filled with pending data packets processed earlier, which in turn are waiting for their turn of transmission due to slow transmission of previously transmitted data packets.


In a typical situation, the TCP proxy server sends a TCP acknowledgement, according to the TCP protocol, upon successfully receiving appropriate amount of TCP data from the server. When the server receives the TCP acknowledgement of prior transmitted TCP data, the server would send additional TCP data packets to the TCP proxy server. The TCP proxy server would further increase memory space for the server side session receive buffer in order to store the additional TCP data packets, while waiting for the prior TCP data to be processed and sent to the client. The cascading effect causes the TCP proxy server to consume large amount of memory space for the server side session receive buffer necessary to hold the received TCP data packets of the server side session. The more buffer space is used, the less the memory resource becomes available for the TCP proxy server to handle additional TCP proxy sessions; despite the TCP proxy server may have other abundant resources to handle additional load.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to one embodiment of the present invention, a method for reducing buffer usage for a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) proxy session between a client and a server, comprising: determining a first round trip time (RTT) for a server side TCP session of the TCP proxy session between a service gateway and the server, and determining a second RTT for a client side TCP session of the TCP proxy session between the service gateway and the client; comparing the first RTT with the second RTT by the service gateway; determining whether the second RTT exceeds the first RTT; in response to determining that the second RTT exceeds the first RTT, calculating by the service gateway a desired RTT based on the second RTT; and setting a timer by the service gateway according to the calculated desired RTT, wherein a TCP acknowledgement for the server side TCP session is delayed until the timer expires.


In one aspect of the present invention, the determining whether the second RTT exceeds the first RTT and the calculating a desired RTT based on the second RTT comprise: determining whether the second RTT exceeds the first RTT beyond a predetermined threshold; and in response to determining that the second RTT exceeds the first RTT beyond the predetermined threshold, calculating by the service gateway the desired RTT based on the second RTT.


In one aspect of the present invention, the calculating a desired RTT based on the second RTT comprises: calculating by the service gateway the desired RTT as a percentage of the second RTT.


In one aspect of the present invention, the calculating a desired RTT based on the second RTT comprises: calculating by the service gateway the desired RTT as the second RTT minus a predetermined value.


In one aspect of the present invention, the setting a times by the service gateway according to the calculated desired RTT comprises: receiving by the service gateway a data packet from the server over the server side TCP session; determining by the service gateway a need to send the TCP acknowledgement to the server; setting a timer to the desired RTT by the service gateway; and in response to an expiration of the timer, sending the TCP acknowledgement to the server by the service gateway.


System and computer readable medium corresponding to the above-summarized methods are also described and claimed herein.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 illustrates a service gateway servicing a TCP proxy session between a client device and a server according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 1A illustrates components of a service gateway according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 illustrates a process to delay sending a TCP ACK packet according to an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention can take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment containing both hardware and software elements. In a preferred embodiment, the present invention is implemented in software, which includes but is not limited to firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.


Furthermore, the present invention can take the form of a computer program product accessible from a computer-usable or computer-readable medium providing program code for use by or in connection with a computer or any instruction execution system. For the purposes of this description, a computer-usable or computer readable medium can be any apparatus that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.


The medium can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium. Examples of a computer-readable medium include a semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk and an optical disk. Current examples of optical disks include compact disk-read only memory (CD-ROM), compact disk-read/write (CD-R/W) and DVD.


A data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing program code will include at least one processor coupled directly or indirectly to memory elements through a system bus. The memory elements can include local memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulk storage, and cache memories which provide temporary storage of at least some program code in order to reduce the number of times code must be retrieved from bulk storage during execution.


Input/output or I/O devices (including but not limited to keyboards, displays, point devices, etc.) can be coupled to the system either directly or through intervening I/O controllers.


Network adapters may also be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system to become coupled to other data processing systems or remote printers or storage devices through intervening private or public networks. Modems, cable modem and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currently available types of network adapters.


The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified local function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.


The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.


The embodiments of the present invention, as described below, adjusts the server side session transmission time, in order to reduce the buffer usage, which in turn increases the capacity of TCP proxy sessions of a TCP proxy server. According to embodiments of the present invention, a TCP proxy server delays a server from sending the additional TCP data, where the delay allows the TCP proxy server to process and send the current TCP data in the server side session receive buffer to be processed and sent to the client. When the server sends the additional TCP data after a delay, the TCP proxy server would have sufficient space in the server side session receive buffer to receive the additional TCP data. Such a delay lengthens the transmission time for the server side session between the server and the TCP proxy server.



FIG. 1 illustrates a service gateway 300 servicing a TCP proxy session 400 between a client device 100 and server device 200 via a data network 153 according to an embodiment of the present invention.


In one embodiment, data network 153 includes an Internet Protocol (IP) network, a corporate data network, a regional corporate data network, an Internet service provider network, a residential data network, a wired network such as Ethernet, a wireless network such as a WiFi network, or a cellular network. In one embodiment, data network 153 resides in a data center, or connects to a network or application network cloud.


Client device 100 is typically a computing device with network access capabilities. In one embodiment, client device 100 is a workstation, a desktop personal computer or a laptop personal computer, a Personal Data Assistant (PDA), a tablet computing device, a smartphone, or a cellular phone, a set-top box, an Internet media viewer, an Internet media player, a smart sensor, a smart medical device, a net-top box, a networked television set, a networked DVR, a networked Blu-ray player, a networked handheld gaming device, or a media center.


In one embodiment, client device 100 is a residential broadband gateway, a business Internet gateway, a business Web proxy server, a network customer premise device (CPE), or an Internet access gateway.


In one embodiment, client device 100 includes a broadband remote access server (BRAS), a Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexer (DSLAM), a Cable Modem Terminating System (CMTS), or a service provider access gateway.


In one embodiment, client device 100 includes a mobile broadband access gateway such as a Gateway GPRS Support Node (GGSN), a Home Agent (HA), or a PDN Gateway (PGW).


In one embodiment, client device 100 includes a server load balancer, an application delivery controller, a traffic manager, a firewall, a VPN server, a remote access server, or an enterprise or data center access gateway.


In one embodiment, client device 100 is a device similar to service gateway 300.


Client device 100 initiates TCP proxy session 400 towards server 200 via service gateway 300.


Server 200 is a computing device typically coupled to a processor and a computer readable medium which stores computer readable program code. Server 200, with the processor and the computer readable program code, implements functionality of a Web server, a file server, a video server, a database server, an application server, a voice system, a conferencing server, a media gateway, a media center, an application server or a network server providing a TCP-based service or an application service to client device 100 using the TCP proxy session 400.


In one embodiment, server 200 is a device similar to service gateway 300.


In one embodiment, TCP proxy session 400 includes a HTTP session, a FTP file transfer session, a TCP-based video streaming session, a TCP-based music streaming session, a file download session, a group conferencing session, a database access session, a remote terminal access session, a Telnet session, an e-commerce transaction, a remote procedure call, or a TCP-based network communication session.


Service gateway 300, illustrated in FIG. 1A, is operationally coupled to a processor 310, a memory module 320, a network interface module 330, and a computer readable medium 340. The computer readable medium 340 stores computer readable program code, which when executed by the processor 310 using the memory module 320, implements the various embodiments of the present invention as described herein. In some embodiments, service gateway 300 is implemented as a server load balancer, an application delivery controller, a service delivery platform, a traffic manager, a security gateway, a component of a firewall system, a component of a virtual private network (VPN), a load balancer for video servers, a gateway to distribute load to one or more servers, a Web or HTTP server, a network address translation (NAT) gateway, or a TCP proxy server.


In one embodiment, computer readable medium 340 includes instructions for a service application 350 and processor 310 executes service application 350.


In one embodiment, service application 350 implements functionality of a VPN firewall, a gateway security application, a HTTP proxy, a TCP-based audio or video streaming session proxy, a Web session proxy, content filtering, server load balancing, firewall, or a network application session proxy.


Returning to FIG. 1, in one embodiment of servicing TCP proxy session 400 between client device 100 and server 200, service gateway 300 establishes a client side TCP session 420 with client device 100, and a server side TCP session 470 with server 200.


In one embodiment, service gateway 300 allocates a receive buffer 474 for server side TCP session 470. In one embodiment, receive buffer 474 resides in memory module 320.


In one embodiment, service gateway 300 monitors performance of server side TCP session 470 using round trip time (RTT) 497 of server side TCP session 470. Service gateway 300 measures or estimates RTT 497 for server side TCP session 470. In one example embodiment, service gateway 300 measures RTT 497 based on a time duration between a time service gateway 300 sends a data packet of server side TCP session 470 to server 200 and a time service gateway 300 receives an acknowledgement for the sent data packet. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 measures RTT 497 periodically or occasionally during server side TCP session 470. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 estimates RTT 497 based on one or more prior server side TCP sessions with server 200. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 estimates RTT 497 to be 10 milliseconds, 100 milliseconds, 3 milliseconds, 22 milliseconds, or 3 seconds.


In one embodiment, service gateway 300 retrieves data from receive buffer 474, processes the data by, in one embodiment, service application 350, and transmits the processed data to client device 100 through client side TCP session 420. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 processes data from receive buffer 474 whenever client side TCP session 420 is ready for transmission. A slow transmission of client side TCP session 420 causes delay for service gateway 300 to process data from receive buffer 474. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 monitors performance of client side TCP session 420 using round trip time (RTT) 492 of client side TCP session 420. Service gateway 300 measures or estimates RTT 492 for client side TCP session 420. In one example embodiment, service gateway 300 measures RTT 492 based on a time duration between a time service gateway 300 sends a data packet of client side TCP session 420 to client device 100 and a time service gateway 300 receives an acknowledgement for the sent data packet. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 measures RTT 492 periodically or occasionally during client side TCP session 420. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 estimates RTT 492 based on one or more prior client side TCP sessions with client device 100. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 estimates RTT 492 to be 10 milliseconds, 100 milliseconds, 3 milliseconds, 22 milliseconds, or 3 seconds.


In one embodiment, service gateway 300 compares RTT 497 with RTT 492. In one embodiment, when service gateway 300 determines RTT 492 exceeds RTT 497 beyond a certain threshold, service gateway 300 applies a processing, described further below, in order to adjust RTT 497 to narrow the gap between RTT 492 and RTT 497. In one embodiment, RTT 492 is determined to exceed RTT 497 beyond the threshold when RTT 492 is at least 2 times higher than RTT 497, 5 times higher, or 10 times higher; or when RTT 492 is at least larger than RTT 497 by a predetermined amount such as 20 milliseconds, 50 milliseconds, or 200 milliseconds.


In one embodiment, service gateway 300 determines RTT 492 does not exceed RTT 497 beyond the threshold, and service gateway 300 does not adjust RTT 497.


In one embodiment, service gateway 300 measures RTT 492 and RTT 497 regularly or occasionally, and compares RTT 492 with RTT 497.



FIG. 2 illustrates a process for adjusting RTT 497 for server side TCP session 470 according to an embodiment of the present invention. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 receives data packet 480 over server side TCP session 470 from server 200. Service gateway 300 stores data packet 480 into receive buffer 474. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 determines from receive buffer 474 a need to send a TCP acknowledge (i.e., TCP ACK data packet 479) per TCP protocol. Instead of sending TCP ACK data packet 479 immediately, service gateway 300 schedules to send TCP ACK data packet 479 at a later time, using timer 487. Service gateway 300 sets timer 487 to a desired RTT 498. When timer 487 expires, service gateway 300 sends TCP ACK data packet 479. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 includes a clock (not shown) which allows service gateway 300 to determine if timer 487 expires.


In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates desired RTT 498 based on RTT 492. In one embodiment, desired RTT 498 is computed to within a substantial range of RTT 492. For example, desired RTT 498 is computed as a predetermined percentage of RTT 492, such as 30%, 40%, 60% or 75% of RTT 492. In one embodiment, desired RTT 498 is computed to RTT 492 minus a predetermined value, such as 10 millisecond, 5 milliseconds, or 25 milliseconds. Desired RTT 498 provides a timed delay of sending TCP Acknowledgement for server side TCP session 470 and thus increases round trip time of server side TCP session 470. When service gateway 300 measures RTT 497 as illustrated in FIG. 1 after sending TCP ACK data packet 479, RTT 497 is expected have a value similar to desired RTT 498.


In one embodiment, service gateway 300 performs the process of measuring RTT 497, RTT 492, comparing RTT 492 to RTT 497, and processing steps in FIG. 2 when service gateway 300 determines RTT 492 is substantially larger than RTT 497, in order to reduce the memory capacity of receive buffer 474, which in turn increases the capability for service gateway 300 to process additional TCP proxy sessions.


In one embodiment, the predetermined percentage or predetermined value of RTT 492 is determined by a user through experiments using various percentages and values for different TCP proxy sessions for different clients and servers. Typically, the smaller the difference between RTT 492 and RTT 497, the smaller the memory capacity of receive buffer 474 is necessary. In one embodiment, the user configures a desired RTT 498 so as to reduce the difference between RTT 497 and RTT 492. In one embodiment, the predetermined percentage is between 30% and 50%, and is configured by a user to the service gateway 300. The user may configure a higher value for the predetermined percentage or desired RTT 498 for smaller receive buffer 474 capacity, and configure a smaller value for the predetermined percentage or desired RTT 498 for larger receive buffer 474 capacity. The user may consider a predetermined percentage or predetermined value in order to balance between the receive buffer 474 capacity and the desired RTT 498.


Although the present invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments and those variations would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for reducing memory usage of a service gateway buffer resident in a memory module of a service gateway for a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) proxy session between a client and a server by adjusting server side session transmission time to reduce buffer usage, comprising: determining a first round trip time (RTT) for a server side TCP session of the TCP proxy session between the service gateway and the server, the first RTT being estimated based at least on an average of one or more prior server side TCP sessions with the server;determining a second RTT for the client side TCP session of the TCP proxy session between the service gateway and the client, the second RTT being estimated based at least on an average of one or more prior client side TCP sessions with the client;comparing the first RTT with the second RTT by the service gateway;determining that the second RTT exceeds the first RTT;comparing a difference between the second RTT and the first RTT;in response to determining that the difference is above a predetermined threshold, calculating by the service gateway a desired RTT based on the second RTT, the calculation based at least in part on a memory capacity of server side receive buffer; andsetting a timer by the service gateway according to the calculated desired RTT, wherein a TCP acknowledgement for the server side TCP session is delayed until the service gateway determines that the timer expires.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining whether the second RTT exceeds the first RTT and the calculating a desired RTT based on the second RTT comprise: determining whether the second RTT exceeds the first RTT beyond a predetermined threshold; andin response to determining that the second RTT exceeds the first RTT beyond the predetermined threshold, calculating by the service gateway the desired RTT based on the second RTT.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the calculating a desired RTT based on the second RTT comprises: calculating by the service gateway the desired RTT as a percentage of the second RTT.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the calculating a desired RTT based on the second RTT comprises: calculating by the service gateway the desired RTT as the second RTT minus a predetermined value.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the setting a timer by the service gateway according to the calculated desired RTT comprises: receiving by the service gateway a data packet from the server over the server side TCP session;determining by the service gateway a need to send the TCP acknowledgement to the server;setting a timer to the desired RTT by the service gateway; andin response to an expiration of the timer, sending the TCP acknowledgement to the server by the service gateway.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the second RTT is determined at periodic intervals.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the second RTT is estimated based on one or more prior server side TCP sessions.
  • 8. A non-transitory computer readable medium with computer readable program code embodied therewith for reducing memory usage of a service gateway buffer resident in a memory module of a service gateway for a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) proxy session between a client and a server by adjusting server side session transmission time to reduce buffer usage, the computer readable program code configured to: determine a first round trip time (RTT) for a server side TCP session of the TCP proxy session between a service gateway and the server, the first RTT being estimated based at least on an average of one or more prior server side TCP sessions with the server;determine a second RTT for the client side TCP session of the TCP proxy session between the service gateway and the client, the second RTT being estimated based at least on an average of one or more prior client side TCP sessions with the client;compare the first RTT with the second RTT by the service gateway;determine that the second RTT exceeds the first RTT;compare a difference between the second RTT and the first RTT:in response to determining that the difference is above a predetermined threshold, calculate a desired RTT based on the second RTT, the calculation based at least in part on a memory capacity of server side receive buffer; andset a timer by the service gateway according to the calculated desired RTT, wherein the TCP acknowledgement for the server side TCP session is delayed until the service gateway determines that the timer expires.
  • 9. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8, wherein the computer readable program code configured to determine whether the second RTT exceeds the first RTT and to calculate a desired RTT based on the second RTT are further configured to: determine whether the second RTT exceeds the first RTT beyond a predetermined threshold; andin response to determining that the second RTT exceeds the first RTT beyond the predetermined threshold, calculating by the service gateway the desired RTT based on the second RTT.
  • 10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8, wherein the computer readable program code configured to calculate a desired RTT based on the second RTT is further configured to: calculate the desired RTT as a percentage of the second RTT.
  • 11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8, wherein the computer readable program code configured to calculate a desired RTT based on the second RTT is further configured to: calculate the desired RTT as the second RTT minus a predetermined value.
  • 12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8, where computer readable program code configured to set the timer according to the calculated desired RTT is further configured to: receive a data packet from the server over the server side TCP session;determine a need to send the TCP acknowledgement to the server; set a timer to the desired RTT; andin response to an expiration of the timer, send the TCP acknowledgement to the server.
  • 13. A system for reducing memory usage of a service gateway buffer for a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) proxy session between a client and a server by adjusting server side session transmission time to reduce the buffer usage, the system comprising: a service gateway comprising a processor, a memory module, and a server side receive buffer residing in the memory module, wherein a server side TCP session of the TCP proxy session is established between the service gateway and the server, and a client side TCP session of the TCP proxy session is established between the service gateway and the client, wherein the service gateway:determines a first round trip time (RTT) for a server side TCP session of the TCP proxy session between the service gateway and the server the first RTT being estimated based on at least an average of one or more prior server side TCP sessions with the server;determines a second RTT for the client side TCP session of the TCP proxy session between the service gateway and the client, the second RTT being estimated based at least on an average of one or more prior client side TCP sessions with the client;compares the first RTT with the second RTT;determines that the second RTT exceeds the first RTT;compares a difference between the second RTT and the first RTT;in response to determining that the difference is above a predetermined threshold, calculates a desired RTT based on the second RTT, the calculation based at least in part on a memory capacity of server side receive buffer; andsets a timer according to the calculated desired RTT, wherein the TCP acknowledgement for the server side TCP session is delayed until the timer expires.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the determines whether the second RTT exceeds the first RTT and the calculates a desired RTT based on the second RTT comprise: determines whether the second RTT exceeds the first RTT beyond a predetermined threshold; andin response to determining that the second RTT exceeds the first RTT beyond the predetermined threshold, calculates the desired RTT based on the second RTT.
  • 15. The system of claim 13, wherein the calculates a desired RTT based on the second RTT comprises: calculates the desired RTT as a percentage of the second RTT.
  • 16. The system of claim 13, wherein the calculates a desired RTT based on the second RTT comprises: calculates the desired RTT as the second RTT minus a predetermined value.
  • 17. The system of claim 13, wherein the sets a timer according to the calculated desired RTT further comprises: receives a data packet from the server over the server side TCP session; determines a need to send the TCP acknowledgement to the server; sets a timer to the desired RTT; andin response to an expiration of the timer, sends the TCP acknowledgement to the server.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/747,545, filed Jan. 23, 2013 and entitled “Reducing Buffer Usage for TCP Proxy Session Based on Delayed Acknowledgement,” issued Dec. 27, 2016 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,531,846. The disclosure of the above reference application is hereby incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (202)
Number Name Date Kind
5774660 Brendel et al. Jun 1998 A
5862339 Bonnaure et al. Jan 1999 A
5875185 Wang et al. Feb 1999 A
5958053 Denker Sep 1999 A
6003069 Cavill Dec 1999 A
6047268 Bartoli et al. Apr 2000 A
6075783 Voit Jun 2000 A
6131163 Wiegel Oct 2000 A
6321338 Porras et al. Nov 2001 B1
6374300 Masters Apr 2002 B2
6456617 Oda et al. Sep 2002 B1
6483600 Schuster et al. Nov 2002 B1
6535516 Leu et al. Mar 2003 B1
6578066 Logan et al. Jun 2003 B1
6587866 Modi et al. Jul 2003 B1
6600738 Alperovich et al. Jul 2003 B1
6658114 Farn et al. Dec 2003 B1
6772205 Lavian et al. Aug 2004 B1
6772334 Glawitsch Aug 2004 B1
6779033 Watson et al. Aug 2004 B1
6804224 Schuster et al. Oct 2004 B1
7010605 Dharmarajan Mar 2006 B1
7058718 Fontes et al. Jun 2006 B2
7069438 Balabine et al. Jun 2006 B2
7143087 Fairweather Nov 2006 B2
7167927 Philbrick et al. Jan 2007 B2
7181524 Lele Feb 2007 B1
7228359 Monteiro Jun 2007 B1
7254133 Govindarajan et al. Aug 2007 B2
7269850 Govindarajan et al. Sep 2007 B2
7301899 Goldstone Nov 2007 B2
7310686 Uysal Dec 2007 B2
7328267 Bashyam et al. Feb 2008 B1
7337241 Boucher et al. Feb 2008 B2
7343399 Hayball et al. Mar 2008 B2
7370353 Yang May 2008 B2
7373500 Ramelson et al. May 2008 B2
7391725 Huitema et al. Jun 2008 B2
7398317 Chen et al. Jul 2008 B2
7423977 Joshi Sep 2008 B1
7430755 Hughes et al. Sep 2008 B1
7467202 Savchuk Dec 2008 B2
7506360 Wilkinson et al. Mar 2009 B1
7512980 Copeland et al. Mar 2009 B2
7552323 Shay Jun 2009 B2
7584262 Wang et al. Sep 2009 B1
7590736 Hydrie et al. Sep 2009 B2
7610622 Touitou et al. Oct 2009 B2
7613193 Swami et al. Nov 2009 B2
7613822 Joy et al. Nov 2009 B2
7673072 Boucher et al. Mar 2010 B2
7675854 Chen et al. Mar 2010 B2
7711790 Barrett et al. May 2010 B1
7733866 Mishra et al. Jun 2010 B2
7747748 Allen Jun 2010 B2
7826487 Mukerji et al. Nov 2010 B1
7965727 Sakata et al. Jun 2011 B2
7979694 Touitou et al. Jul 2011 B2
7990847 Leroy et al. Aug 2011 B1
7992201 Aldridge et al. Aug 2011 B2
8081640 Ozawa et al. Dec 2011 B2
8090866 Bashyam et al. Jan 2012 B1
8099492 Dahlin et al. Jan 2012 B2
8116312 Riddoch et al. Feb 2012 B2
8122116 Matsunaga et al. Feb 2012 B2
8151019 Le et al. Apr 2012 B1
8185651 Moran et al. May 2012 B2
8261339 Aldridge et al. Sep 2012 B2
8379515 Mukerji Feb 2013 B1
8559437 Mishra et al. Oct 2013 B2
8560693 Wang et al. Oct 2013 B1
RE44701 Chen et al. Jan 2014 E
8681610 Mukerji Mar 2014 B1
8782221 Han Jul 2014 B2
8977749 Han Mar 2015 B1
9094364 Jalan et al. Jul 2015 B2
9106561 Jalan et al. Aug 2015 B2
9137301 Dunlap et al. Sep 2015 B1
9154584 Han Oct 2015 B1
9386088 Zheng et al. Jul 2016 B2
9531846 Han et al. Dec 2016 B2
20010042200 Lamberton et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020026515 Michielsens et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020032799 Wiedeman et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020078164 Reinschmidt Jun 2002 A1
20020091844 Craft et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020103916 Chen et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020138618 Szabo Sep 2002 A1
20020141386 Minert et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020143991 Chow et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020188678 Edecker et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030009591 Hayball et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030035409 Wang et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030061506 Cooper et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030135625 Fontes et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040010545 Pandya Jan 2004 A1
20040062246 Boucher et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073703 Boucher et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078419 Ferrari et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078480 Boucher et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040103315 Cooper et al. May 2004 A1
20040250059 Ramelson et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050005207 Herneque Jan 2005 A1
20050036511 Baratakke et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050039033 Meyers et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050080890 Yang et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050163073 Heller et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050198335 Brown et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050213586 Cyganski et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050240989 Kim et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050281190 McGee et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060023721 Miyake et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036610 Wang Feb 2006 A1
20060041745 Parnes Feb 2006 A1
20060069804 Miyake et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060164978 Werner et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060168319 Trossen Jul 2006 A1
20060230129 Swami et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060280121 Matoba Dec 2006 A1
20070019543 Wei et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070022479 Sikdar et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070076653 Park et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070124502 Li May 2007 A1
20070180119 Khivesara et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070185998 Touitou et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070195792 Chen et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070230337 Igarashi et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070242738 Park et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070243879 Park et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070245090 King et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070248009 Petersen Oct 2007 A1
20080016161 Tsirtsis et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080031263 Ervin et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080076432 Senarath et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080120129 Seubert et al. May 2008 A1
20080225722 Khemani et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080253390 Das et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080291911 Lee Nov 2008 A1
20080298303 Tsirtsis Dec 2008 A1
20090024722 Sethuraman et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090031415 Aldridge et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090077651 Poeluev Mar 2009 A1
20090092124 Singhal et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090138606 Moran et al. May 2009 A1
20090138945 Savchuk May 2009 A1
20090164614 Christian et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090285196 Lee et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100042869 Szabo et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100054139 Chun et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100061319 Aso et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100064008 Yan et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082787 Kommula Apr 2010 A1
20100095018 Khemani et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100106854 Kim et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100205310 Altshuler et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100228819 Wei Sep 2010 A1
20100235522 Chen et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100238828 Russell Sep 2010 A1
20100265824 Chao et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100268814 Cross et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100318631 Shukla Dec 2010 A1
20100322252 Suganthi et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100333101 Pope et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110007652 Bai Jan 2011 A1
20110032941 Quach et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110060831 Ishii et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110083174 Aldridge et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110093522 Chen et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110099623 Garrard et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110149879 Noriega et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110276982 Nakayama et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110302256 Sureshehandra et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120008495 Shen et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120117382 Larson et al. May 2012 A1
20120173759 Agarwal et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120215910 Wada Aug 2012 A1
20120290727 Tivig Nov 2012 A1
20130135996 Torres et al. May 2013 A1
20130136139 Zheng et al. May 2013 A1
20130166762 Jalan et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130176854 Chisu et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130191486 Someya et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130250765 Ehsan Sep 2013 A1
20130258846 Damola Oct 2013 A1
20140012972 Han Jan 2014 A1
20140169168 Jalan et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140207845 Han et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140258536 Chiong Sep 2014 A1
20140286313 Fu Sep 2014 A1
20140359052 Joachimpillai et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150026794 Zuk Jan 2015 A1
20150156223 Xu et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150237173 Virkki Aug 2015 A1
20150244566 Puimedon Aug 2015 A1
20150296058 Jalan et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150312092 Golshan et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150350048 Sampat et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150350379 Jalan et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160014052 Han Jan 2016 A1
20160014126 Jalan et al. Jan 2016 A1
20170048107 Dosovitsky et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170048356 Thompson et al. Feb 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (44)
Number Date Country
1372662 Oct 2002 CN
1473300 Feb 2004 CN
1529460 Sep 2004 CN
1575582 Feb 2005 CN
1910869 Feb 2007 CN
101189598 May 2008 CN
101442425 May 2009 CN
101682532 Mar 2010 CN
102123156 Jul 2011 CN
102577252 Jul 2012 CN
103533018 Jan 2014 CN
103944954 Jul 2014 CN
104040990 Sep 2014 CN
104137491 Nov 2014 CN
104796396 Jul 2015 CN
102577252 Mar 2016 CN
1209876 May 2002 EP
2296313 Mar 2011 EP
2760170 Jul 2014 EP
2760170 Dec 2015 EP
1189438 Jun 2014 HK
1199153 Jun 2015 HK
1199779 Jul 2015 HK
1200617 Aug 2015 HK
261CHE2014 Jul 2016 IN
2000307634 Nov 2000 JP
2014143686 Aug 2014 JP
5906263 Apr 2016 JP
1020130096624 Aug 2013 KR
101576585 Dec 2015 KR
269763 Feb 1996 TW
425821 Mar 2001 TW
444478 Jul 2001 TW
WO2001013228 Feb 2001 WO
WO2001014990 Mar 2001 WO
WO2003103237 Dec 2003 WO
WO2008053954 May 2008 WO
WO2011049770 Apr 2011 WO
WO2011079381 Jul 2011 WO
WO2013081952 Jun 2013 WO
WO2013096019 Jun 2013 WO
WO2014031046 Feb 2014 WO
WO2014093829 Jun 2014 WO
WO2015164026 Oct 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)
Entry
Cardellini et al., “Dynamic Load Balancing on Web-server Systems”, IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 3, No. 3, May-Jun. 1999, 24 pages.
Goldszmidt et al., “NetDispatcher: A TCP Connection Router,” IBM Research Report RC 20853, May 19, 1997, pp. 1-31.
Koike et al., “Transport Middleware for Network-Based Control,” IEICE Technical Report, Jun. 22, 2000, vol. 100, No. 53, pp. 13-18.
Yamamoto et al., “Performance Evaluation of Window Size in Proxy-based TCP for Multi-hop Wireless Networks,” IPSJ SIG Technical Reports, May 15, 2008, vol. 2008, No. 44, pp. 109-114.
Abe et al., “Adaptive Split Connection Schemes in Advanced Relay Nodes,” IEICE Technical Report, Feb. 22, 2010, vol. 109, No. 438, pp. 25-30.
Gite, Vivek, “Linux Tune Network Stack (Buffers Size) to Increase Networking Performance,” nixCraft [online], Jul. 8, 2009 [retreived on Apr. 13, 2016], Retreived from the Internt: <URL:http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-tcp-tuning/>, 24 pages.
“Tcp—TCP Protocol,” FreeBSD, Linux Programmer's Manual [online], Nov. 25, 2007 [retreived on Apr. 13, 2016], Retreived from the Internet: <URL:https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi? query=tcp&apropos=0&sektion=7&manpath=SuSE+Linux%2Fi386+11.0&format=asci>, 11 pages.
“Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol”, Cisco, Document ID 16406, Sep. 9, 2005 update, 43 pages.
Crotti, Manuel et al., “Detecting HTTP Tunnels with Statistical Mechanisms”, IEEE International Conference on Communications, Jun. 24-28, 2007, pp. 6162-6168.
Haruyama, Takahiro et al., “Dial-to-Connect VPN System for Remote DLNA Communication”, IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, CCNC 2008. 5th IEEE, Jan. 10-12, 2008, pp. 1224-1225.
Chen, Jianhua et al., “SSL/TLS-based Secure Tunnel Gateway System Design and Implementation”, IEEE International Workshop on Anti-counterfeiting, Security, Identification, Apr. 16-18, 2007, pp. 258-261.
“EIGRP MPLS VPN PE-CE Site of Origin (SoO)”, Cisco Systems, Feb. 28, 2006, 14 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170126575 A1 May 2017 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13747545 Jan 2013 US
Child 15374935 US