The present invention generally relates to a magnetic switch, and a method and apparatus for reducing the effect of magnetic fields and electromagnetic fields on an implanted magnet and electronics in an implant, respectively.
Partly implantable systems may use magnets to hold internal and external pieces in place. For example, as shown in
Upon a wearer of such a cochlear implant 102 having to undergo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examination, interactions between the implanted magnet 106 and the applied external MRI magnetic field may, at higher field strength (i.e. above about 1 Tesla), produce two harmful effects. First, as shown in
Another potentially dangerous effect may occur when RF pulses emitted by the MRI unit induce voltages in the implant coil, implant circuit and/or electrode circuit. These voltages may generate unwanted stimulation, especially in implants with analog electronic circuitry. Additionally, over-voltages may be generated which could destroy the implant electronics.
Still other adverse effects can occur when a patient with a cochlear implant undergoes an MRI examination. For example, artifacts may appear in the MRI image. These artifacts are caused by the local magnetic field of the implanted magnet, which distorts the homogeneous MRI field.
Present efforts to address the above-described problems include generally forbidding a patient with the cochlear implant to undergo the high-field MRI examination. However, this may exclude the patient from certain important diagnostic measures. Alternatively, the implant can be designed to minimize certain risks related to MRI examinations. For example, to avoid risks related to the implant magnet, the implant could be designed in such a way that the magnet can be removed from the patient before MRI examination and be reinserted afterwards. This requires two surgical interventions in order to perform a MRI examination, and makes it impossible to use the implant system during the healing phase of the incision. Furthermore, the necessity to surgically remove the magnet before the MRI examination is a drawback especially in emergency cases and even could be forgotten in some cases. Other ways to minimize the risk of a torque exerted on the implant magnet is to use two identical implant magnets with opposite orientation, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,348,070 issued to Teissl and Hochmair, or to use a magnetically soft material (also called a “keeper”) instead of a permanent magnet inside the implant. At present, the magnetically soft material used for the keeper has been limited to solid alloys or Ferrite.
Current methodologies to reduce the risks related to induction of possibly excessive voltages in the implant coil and circuits during an MRI examination include, for example, adding a Zener diode or a similar electronic component to the electronic circuit. Other designs include the use of two implant coils with opposite direction so as to reduce the induced voltages in the implant coils, and the use of REED contacts as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,348,070 issued to Teissl and Hochmair.
In a first embodiment of the invention there is provided a magnetic switch. The magnetic switch includes a first switching contact and a second switching contact, and a magnet free to rotate such that the magnet is capable of aligning at least partially with an external magnetic field. A magnetically soft body that includes an electrically conductive surface is shiftable between a first position where the body is in simultaneous contact with the first and second switching contacts, and a second position where the body is out of contact with at least one of the first and second switching contacts. The body and magnet are positioned such that the body is shifted to one of the first position and the second position as a function of the external magnetic field resulting in a magnetic force between the magnet and the magnetically soft body.
In related embodiments of the invention, the magnet may, without limitation, be a sphere or cylindrical. The magnetically soft body may have a calotte having a curvature that follows an adjacent surface of the magnet. The switch may be enclosed in a housing, which may be non-magnetic. The switch may be hermetically encapsulated. The switch may be included in a cochlear implant, the implant further including a first coil adapted to be electromagnetically coupled with a second coil of an external device. The switch may provide overvoltage protection for the cochlear implant, as a function of an orientation of the external magnetic field.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, an implant includes a housing. At least one magnet is free to turn in the housing such that the at least one magnet is capable of aligning at least partially with an external magnetic field.
In related embodiments of the invention, the at least one magnet is adapted to be magnetically attracted to a non-implanted magnet of an external device so as to hold the external device in a desired position relative to the implant. The implant may be a cochlear implant. The implant may include a first coil adapted to be electromagnetically coupled with a second coil of an external device. The housing may be an encapsulation that hermetically seals the at least one magnet. The housing may include a magnetically soft material at least partially surrounding the at least one magnet. The housing may be made of titanium, nonmagnetic stainless steel, or a ceramic. The adjacent surfaces of the housing or magnet may be lubricated, or be made of Teflon. The at least one magnet may be spherical or cylindrical in shape and/or coated with a conductive surface. The at least one magnet may be a plurality of spherically shaped magnets.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, an implant includes a magnet adapted to be magnetically attracted to a non-implanted magnet of an external device so as to hold the external device in a desired position relative to the implant. A magnetically soft material at least partially surrounds the magnet so as to reduce the torque and/or demagnetization of the magnet caused by an external magnetic field. The implant may be a cochlear implant.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a magnetic switch includes a housing and a first and second switching contact positioned within the housing. Additionally, a magnet is positioned within the housing. The magnet is free to rotate in the housing and includes at least one conductive surface covering a portion of the magnet. The magnet is capable of rotating, in response to an external magnetic field, to one of a first position and a second position. In the first position, the at least one conducting surface is in contact with both the first and second switching contacts. In the second position, the conducting surface is out of contact with at least one of the first and second switching contacts.
In related embodiments of the invention, the conducting surface covers a magnetic pole. The magnet may be substantially spherical. The magnet may include a recessed region, which may be non-conductive. The switch may be part of a cochlear implant. The cochlear implant may include a first coil adapted to be electromagnetically coupled with a second coil of an external device. The switch may provide overvoltage protection for the cochlear implant, as a function of an orientation of the external magnetic field.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a magnetic switch includes a housing and at least one spring contact. Each contact includes a pin for driving the contact. A magnet is positioned in the housing and is free to rotate in the housing such that it is capable of aligning at least partially with an external magnetic field. The magnet further includes at least one recessed and/or grooved region. The magnet and the pin are positioned such that the magnet contacts and drive the pin when the pin is not aligned with one of the at least one recessed regions. The pin is not driven when the pin is aligned with one of the at least one recessed regions.
In related embodiments of the invention, at least one recessed region is positioned at a magnetic pole. The magnet may include a north pole and a south pole, the at least one recessed region positioned between the north pole and the south pole. The switch may be part of a cochlear implant, and may include a first coil adapted to be electromagnetically coupled with a second coil of an external device. The switch may provides overvoltage protection as a function of an orientation of the external magnetic field.
In accordance with yet another embodiment of the invention, an implant includes a housing. A magnet is positioned within the housing, the magnet free to rotate such that the magnet is capable of aligning at least partially with an external magnetic field. A magnetically soft body is coupled to the housing. The magnetically soft body is positioned adjacent the magnet so as to provide a path of low reluctance to the magnet.
In related embodiments of the invention, the magnet is one of a spherical magnet and a cylindrical magnet. The body may include a calotte shaped to fit the surface of the magnet. A lubricant may be placed between the magnet and the body. The magnet may include a Teflon surface. The magnet may be adapted to be magnetically attracted to a non-implanted magnet of an external device, so as to hold the external device in a desired position relative to the implant and such that the magnetically soft body is positioned between the magnet and the non-implanted magnet.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, an implant includes a housing. A volume of Ferrofluid is located within the housing, wherein the Ferrofluid becomes magnetized in the direction of an external magnetic field.
In related embodiments of the invention, the volume of Ferrofluid is adapted to be magnetically attracted to a non-implanted magnet of an external device, so as to hold the external device in a desired position relative to the implant. The implant may be a cochlear implant.
The foregoing features of the invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In illustrative embodiments of the invention, a method and device for reducing the effects of strong magnetic fields on an implanted magnet is presented.
The magnet 302 may be enclosed in a housing 303. The housing 303 allows the implanted magnet of whatever shape to turn, possibly with some restrictions, into the external magnetic field lines. In various embodiments of the invention, magnet 302 is hermetically encapsulated so as to prevent corrosion and/or leakage of the material into the body of the implant 300. Material used for the housing/encapsulation 303 may include, without limitation, titanium, nonmagnetic stainless steel, or ceramic. Housing 303 may be held together by a weld seam 301 after insertion of the magnet 302.
As shown in
Instead of a spherical magnet 302, magnet 302 may be of a variety of shapes. For example, magnet 302 may be, without limitation, a cylinder that can rotate about its axis. The cylindrical magnet carries a magnetization being normal to its axis. This axis can be arranged horizontally parallel to the skin in the plane of the implanted coil. This allows the magnet to turn around its axis, so that it may turn its magnetic moment either towards the external holding magnet (as is typically the case during normal use) or so as to align with the field generated, for example, by a high field MRI scanner, whose field lines in a typical examination position run along the patient's axis. In a slightly different arrangement, the axis of the cylinder is still mounted in the plane of the implanted coil, but at approximately up to 45° off the horizontal plane to be able to partially adjust to (lower field) MRI-machines which use vertical magnetic fields. The advantage of a cylindrical magnet is that its aspect ratio (i.e. diameter vs. length) can be chosen such that for a given volume (which is necessary to generate an adequate holding force) the thickness of the magnet is smaller than that of a spherically shaped magnet.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the implant may include several smaller magnets instead of one magnet, allowing for a thinner design of the implant. For example,
As shown in
Another embodiment of the invention for reducing the effects of strong magnetic fields on an implanted magnet is shown in
Referring back to
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a low-reluctance part may be added to the implant to improve the magnetic flux between the implanted magnet and the external magnet and/or shield magnetic field lines at the implant side facing towards the inner side of the body (i.e. in medial direction)—minimizing magnetic resistance and imaging artifacts, especially near the medial side of the implant. For example, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the low-reluctance part is a cylinder 701 with a spherical calotte made of magnetically soft material, as shown in
In further illustrative embodiments of the invention, a method and device for preventing induction of excessive voltages in the implant receiver coil/electronics and in the electrode circuit is presented. These excessive voltages may be induced, for example, by RF pulses during an MRI examination.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, an implant 801 having a permanent magnet 805 positioned in a housing 806 includes a switching function, as shown in
Positioning of low-reluctance part 802, and thus the switching state of one or more electric contacts 807-810, depends on the presence and the orientation of an external magnetic field, resulting in an attractive or repulsive force between the permanent magnet 805 and the low-reluctance part 802. In the absence of an external magnetic field, as shown in
Through the use of electrical contacts 807-810, switching functions can thus be exploited. Based on the external magnetic field, the low-reluctance part 802 is capable of shifting between a first and second position, as described above. In the first position, the electrically conductive surface of the low-reluctance part 802 is in simultaneous contact with a first and a second switching contact 807 and 808 (or alternatively 809 and 810), while in the second position, the electrically conductive surface is out of contact with at least one of the first and second switching contacts 807 and 808 (or alternatively 809 and 810).
Dependant on configuration, the above-described switching function can be implemented to close or open electrical circuits based on the presence of a strong external magnetic field oriented at a certain angle to, for example, the rotational symmetry axis of the device. A switching function which opens an electric circuit during the presence of a strong magnetic field perpendicular to the symmetry axis of the embodiment could, for example, be employed to protect receiver circuits of implants during MRI. If the rotational symmetry axis of the device is oriented perpendicular to the main magnetic field B0 in an MR scanner, a component of the circularly rotating magnetic RF field B1 (generated by the MRI unit) is oriented perpendicular to the receiver coil plane (
Instead of a spherical structure, the permanent magnet 901 may be a cylindrical structure which is free to turn around its rotational axis, as shown in
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, the switch function may include a freely turnable permanent magnet 1001 in a non-magnetic housing 1002, wherein a magnetic soft body is not required, as shown in
Depending on the orientation of the spherical magnet 1001, which is defined by the orientation of the external magnetic field, which may be generated by, without limitation, an external magnet 1006 or an MR scanner, different switching functions (opening or closing of circuits) can be implemented. For example, by conductively coating the spherical magnet 1001 over only one magnetic pole, a switching function can be implemented which opens or closes an electric circuit only at a certain angle and orientation of the external magnetic field. By optimizing the geometric form of conducting and non-conducting surface areas of the spherical magnet, and/or by adding more switching contacts, a wide variety of even more complex switching functions (e.g. “make before break”) can be defined depending on the orientation of the external magnetic field.
In various embodiments, this can be exploited as an over-voltage protection for an implant receiver circuit in an MR scanner. In particular, a switching function between the implant's receiver coil and the implant's receiver electronic circuit can be implemented so as to protect the receiver electronics. In accordance with one embodiment of the invention,
If the rotational symmetry axis of the implant 1101 is oriented parallel to the main magnetic field B0 in an MR scanner, the magnet 1102 is orientated such that the electrically conductive surface 1107 of the magnet 1102 contacts both switching contacts 1105 and 1106, and the switch remains closed, as shown in
A switching function may be also implemented by means other than by electrical/mechanical switching contacts. For example, switching could also depend on different optical properties of the magnet or its surface.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the switching function is accomplished by a freely turnable permanent magnet 1301 in a housing 1302, wherein the magnet 1301 is partly recessed and/or grooved, as shown in
As shown in
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention,
Like for an implant receiver circuit, a switching-function, as described above in accordance with various embodiments of the invention, may also be employed to sufficiently protect an electrode circuit of an implanted stimulator against excessive voltage induction during MRI, if the orientation of the electrode loop plane is known. Electrode circuits may be used, for example, in a cochlear implant to directly stimulate the acoustic nerve.
Additionally, the switching function, as described above in accordance with various embodiments of the invention, may not only be employed to prevent induction of eventually excessive voltages in the implant receiver coil/electronics and in the electrode circuit during an MRI examination, but also for various other reasons which are not limited to MRI examinations. For example, switching functions in an implant could be employed to: switch between a “standard operating” mode and “telemetry” mode of an implant; switch into a mode for re-charging of an implanted battery; de-tune a receiver circuit or to adjust for different receiver frequencies; and optimize RF coupling or power efficiency of an inductive link system.
Furthermore, applications for the magnetically activated switches, as described above in accordance with various embodiments of the invention, is not restricted to the field of medical implants and may be used for implementations other than to avoid induction of potential risks (e.g. torque to the implant magnet, weakening of the implant magnet, induction of excessive voltages in implant circuits) during an MRI examination. The invention could be applied in any area where strong magnetic fields can cause (partial) demagnetization of a permanent magnet or where a hazardous torque is exerted to the magnet. Further, the above-described embodiments of the invention which include electrical switches that are magnetically activated and where the switching state depends on the orientation of the external magnetic field, could be exploited in any other electronic device, whereby receiver coils are switched off by default and can be activated by applying an external magnetic field of a certain orientation.
Additional magnetically sensitive switching elements which may be used to enhance MRI safety of implants, include, but are not limited to: Reed contacts, Hall generators, and Magnetic-field Dependent Resistors (MDR's). The directional sensitivity of these elements may be used with advantage, since in many applications only particular field directions have adverse effects. One advantage that the above-described magneto-switches of the present invention have over REED switches is that the magneto-switches have a switching function at a well-defined angle between the external magnetic field and the symmetry axis of the device. Another advantage that the magneto-switches of the present invention have over Hall generators and MDR's are that they do not require a power supply for switching, since they are passive devices.
The described embodiments of the invention are intended to be merely exemplary and numerous variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. All such variations and modifications are intended to be within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims.
Notice: More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,118,725. The reissue applications are U.S. application Ser. No. 15/676,070, filed Aug. 14, 2017, which is a continuation reissue application of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/098,504, filed Apr. 14, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. RE46,624, which is a continuation reissue application of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/559,056, filed Dec. 3, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. RE46,057, which is a divisional reissue application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/659,025, filed Oct. 24, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. RE45,701, which is a reissue application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/116,758, filed May 26, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,118,725, which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/498,095, filed Jul. 6, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,976,453, which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/475,705, filed Jun. 27, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,566,296, which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/994,950, filed Nov. 22, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,091,806, which is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/405,093, filed Apr. 1, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,838,963, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/387,455, filed Jun. 10, 2002, and also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/369,208, filed Apr. 1, 2002. This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/498,095, filed Jul. 6, 2009, which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/475,705, filed Jun. 27, 2006, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,566,296, which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/994,950, filed Nov. 22, 2004, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,091,806, which in turn is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/405,093, filed Apr. 1, 2003, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,838,963, which in turn claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/369,208, filed Apr. 1, 2002, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/387,455, filed Jun. 10, 2002. Each of these references is incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3487403 | Pihl | Dec 1969 | A |
3573812 | Pihl | Apr 1971 | A |
3575158 | Summers | Apr 1971 | A |
3801767 | Marks | Apr 1974 | A |
3987967 | Kuznetsov et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4038990 | Thompson | Aug 1977 | A |
4199741 | Serrus Paulet | Apr 1980 | A |
4257936 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4317969 | Riegler et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4352960 | Dormer | Oct 1982 | A |
4360007 | Levy et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4595390 | Hakim et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4596971 | Hirabayashi et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4608992 | Hakim et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4628907 | Epley | Dec 1986 | A |
4736747 | Drake | Apr 1988 | A |
RE32947 | Dormer et al. | Jun 1989 | E |
4868530 | Ahs | Sep 1989 | A |
4918745 | Hutchison | Apr 1990 | A |
5015224 | Maniglia | May 1991 | A |
5183056 | Dalen et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5456654 | Ball | Oct 1995 | A |
5554096 | Ball | Sep 1996 | A |
5624376 | Ball et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630835 | Brownlee | May 1997 | A |
5716407 | Knapp et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5749912 | Zhang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762599 | Sohn | Jun 1998 | A |
5800336 | Ball et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5857958 | Ball et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5877664 | Jackson, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897486 | Ball et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5945762 | Chen | Aug 1999 | A |
5949895 | Ball et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6040762 | Tompkins | Mar 2000 | A |
6077299 | Adelberg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6127597 | Beyar et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6175767 | Doyle, Sr. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178079 | Renger | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178353 | Griffith et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190305 | Ball et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198963 | Haim et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208235 | Trontelj | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217508 | Ball et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219580 | Faltys et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246911 | Seligman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263230 | Haynor et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272382 | Faltys et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292678 | Hall et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295472 | Rubinstein et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313551 | Hazelton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6348070 | Teissl et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358281 | Berrang | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6401723 | Garibaldi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417750 | Sohn | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6505062 | Ritter et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506987 | Woods | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522909 | Garibaldi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537210 | Wulfsberg | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6761681 | Schmid et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6838963 | Zimmerling et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7091806 | Zimmerling et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7266208 | Charvin et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7311690 | Burnett | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7566296 | Zimmerling et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7976453 | Zimmerling et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8634909 | Zimmerling et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
RE45701 | Zimmerling et al. | Sep 2015 | E |
RE46057 | Zimmerling et al. | Jul 2016 | E |
RE46624 | Zimmerling et al. | Dec 2017 | E |
20020022793 | Bertrand et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030120202 | Gordon | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040012470 | Zimmerling et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050062567 | Zimmerling et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060244560 | Zimmerling et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20090005836 | Chang et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090287278 | Charvin | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2031896 | Apr 2009 | EP |
1468890 | Mar 1977 | GB |
04023821 | Jan 2004 | JP |
1690749 | Nov 1991 | SU |
WO 9732629 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 0010361 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 03036560 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03081976 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03092326 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004114723 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
MD, Ph.D., Hobbs et al., “Magnetic Resonance Image—Guided Proteoics of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, pp. 530-536 (2003). |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, Application No. PCT/IB03/02283 (dated Nov. 28, 2003). |
Heller et al., “Evaluation of MRI Compatibility of the Modified Nucleus Multichannel Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implants”, The American J. Of Otology 17(5); pp. 724-729 (Sep. 1996). |
Teissl et al., “Cochlear Implants: In Vitro Investigation of Electromagnetic Interference at MR Imaging—Compatibility and Safety Aspects”, Radiology 208(3); pp. 700-708 (Sep. 1998). |
Teissl et al., “Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cochlear Implants: Compatibility and Safety Aspects”, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 9(1); pp. 26-38 (Jan. 1999). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/158,322, 6 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response A filed May 14, 2007 to Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/158,322, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/158,322, 14 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response B filed Jun. 17, 2008 to Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/158,322, 10 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response filed Sep. 19, 2008 to Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/671,132, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Offiec, Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/671,132, 7 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response filed Jan. 5, 2009 to Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/671,132, 13 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees—International Application No. PCT/IB2004/002588, dated Dec. 12, 2004, 4 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Search Report (Extended), dated Jun. 3, 2009, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/498,095, dated Oct. 8, 2010, 14 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2010, filed Feb. 8, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/498,095, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/659,025, dated Nov. 13, 2014, 11 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Nov. 13, 2014 filed Feb. 10, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/659,025, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/559,056, dated Oct. 27, 2015, 11 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2015 filed Jan. 25, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/559,056, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,504, dated Apr. 17, 2017, 10 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2017 filed May 31, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,504, 10 pages. |
Ashby & Geddes, Defendant Advanced Bionics, LLC's Initial Invalidity Contentions, C.A. No. 18-1530-MN, dated Jul. 19, 2019, 27 pages. |
Ashby & Geddes, Exhibits to Defendant Advanced Bionics, LLC's Initial Invalidity Contentions, C.A. No. 18-1530-MN, dated Jul. 19, 2019, 738 pages. |
Teissl, “Cochlear Implants and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Compatibility and Safety Aspects,” Dissertation, Universität Innsbruck, Oct. 1998, 151 pages. |
Sawyer-Glover et al., “Pre-MRI Procedure Screening: Recommendations and Safety Considerations for Biomedical Implants and Devices,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 12, pp. 92-106, 2000. |
Cochlear™ Nucleus® Hybrid™ L24 cochlear implant, C124Reh, Professional Package Insert, 112 pages. |
Advanced Bionics, HiRes 90K®—Surgeon's Manual for the HiFocus® Helix and HiFocus® lj Electrodes, 2005, 87 pages. |
Koch, Ph.D., “Commercial Cochlear Implants,” Seminars in Hearing—vol. 17, No. 4, Nov. 1996, 10 pages. |
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH, SONATATI100 Surgical Guideline, 54 pages. |
James F. Patrick et al., “The Nucleus 22-Channel Cochlear Implant System,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 12, No. 4, Supplement, 1991, 8 pages. |
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Original Complaint, C.A No. 1:18-cv-01530-MN, filed Oct. 3, 2018, 9 pages. |
Asby & Geddes, Defendant Advanced Bionics, LLC's Answer and Defenses, and Counterclaims of Advanced Bionics, LLC, Sonova AG and Advanced Bionics AG, C.A. No. 18-1530-MN, filed Nov. 28, 2018, 203 pages. |
Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Petition for Inter Partes Review (with exhibits 1001-1031), IPR2019-01572, Sep. 4, 2019, 1,289 pages. |
Weber et al., Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compatibility Testing of the Clarion 1.2 Cochlear Implant, The American J. of Otology, 19:587-590 (1998). |
Hochmair et al., Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safety of the Combi 40/Combi 40 + Cochlear Implants, Updates in Cochlear Implantation, Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 57:39-41 (2000). |
Shellock, F., Biomedical Implants and Devices: Assessment of Magnetic Field Interactions With a 3.0-Tesla MR System, J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 16:721-732 (2002). |
Ho, H., Safety of Metallic Implants in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 14:472-477 (2001). |
Woods, T., MRI Safety and Compatibility of Implants and Medical Devices, Stainless Steels for Medical and Surgical Applications, ASTM STP 1438, G.L. Winters and M.J. Nutt, Eds., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 82-90, 2003. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Patent Owner Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH's Preliminary Response (with exhibits 2001-2023), IPR2019-01572, Dec. 23, 2019. |
MED-EL USA announces the FDA approval of the Synchrony cochlear implant, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150123005073/en/FDA-Approves-MED-EL'S-SYNCHRONY-Cochlear-Implant, Jan. 23, 2015 (retrieved Sep. 9, 2019), 3 pages. |
B.G. Kim et al., Adverse events and discomfort during magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implants recipients, JAMA Otolaryngol Head Nech Surg. 141(1), 45-52 (2015). |
M. Zimmerling, Move to 3.0 T MRI Spurs Cochlear Implant Innovation, (2015) https://www.mddionline.com/Move-30-t-mri-spurs-cochlear-implant-innovation, 6 pages (retrieved Oct. 18, 2019). |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Patent Owner's Sur-Reply to Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Preliminary Response, IPR2019-01572, Jan. 30, 2020, 8 pages. |
USPTO/Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review, IPR2019-01572, Mar. 19, 2020, 42 pages. |
Ashby & Geddes, Defendant Advanced Bionics, LLC's Final Invalidity Contention, C.A. No. 18-1530-MN, D. Del., Nov. 9, 2020, 49 pages. |
Koch, D.B., Commercial Cochlear Implants, Seminars in Hearing, vol. 17, No. 4, Nov. 1996, pp. 317-326. |
Department of Health & Human Services, Premarket Approval of Advanced Bionics™ Corporation Clarion® Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant for Pediatric Use, Jun. 26, 1997, 76 pages. |
Patrick, J. et al., The Nucleus 22-Channel Cochlear Implant System, Ear and Hearing, vol. 12, No. 4. Supplement, 1991, pp. 3S-9S. |
Patrick, J. et al., The Development of the Nucleus® Freedom ™ Cochlear Implant System, Trends in Amplification, vol. 10, No. 4, Dec. 2006, pp. 175-200. |
Department of Health & Human Services, Premarket Approval of the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System, Jun. 25, 1998, 44 pages. |
Cochlear™ Nucleus® Implants Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Guidelines, © Cochlear Limited 2020, 88 pages. |
Nucleus® Cochlear Implant System User Manual for the ESPrit™ 3G speech processor and accessories, 88 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60369208 | Apr 2002 | US | |
60387455 | Jun 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13659025 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 14559056 | US | |
Parent | 10405093 | Apr 2003 | US |
Child | 10994950 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15098504 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 13116758 | US | |
Parent | 14559056 | Dec 2014 | US |
Child | 15098504 | US | |
Parent | 12498095 | Jul 2009 | US |
Child | 13116758 | US | |
Parent | 11475705 | Jun 2006 | US |
Child | 12498095 | US | |
Parent | 10994950 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 11475705 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13116758 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 15676070 | US | |
Parent | 13116758 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 13659025 | US |