Reducing electromagnetic interference in a received signal

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9118469
  • Patent Number
    9,118,469
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 28, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 25, 2015
    8 years ago
Abstract
Embodiments of methods and apparatus for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal are disclosed. One method includes receiving a signal over at least two conductors, extracting a common-mode signal from the at least two conductors, processing the common-mode signal, and reducing electromagnetic interference of the received signal by summing the processed common-mode signal with the received signal.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates generally to network communications. More particularly, the invention relates to methods and apparatuses for reducing electromagnetic interference in a received signal.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

High-speed networks are continually evolving. The evolution includes a continuing advancement in the operational speed of the networks. The network implementation of choice that has emerged is Ethernet networks physically connected over unshielded twisted pair wiring. Ethernet in its 10/100BASE-T form is one of the most prevalent high speed LANs (local area network) for providing connectivity between personal computers, workstations and servers.


High-speed LAN technologies include 100BASE-T (Fast Ethernet) and 1000BASE-T (Gigabit Ethernet). Fast Ethernet technology has provided a smooth evolution from 10 Megabits per second (Mbps) performance of 10BASE-T to the 100 Mbps performance of 100BASE-T. Gigabit Ethernet provides 1 Gigabit per second (Gbps) bandwidth with essentially the simplicity of Ethernet. There is a desire to increase operating performance of Ethernet to even greater data rates.



FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a pair of Ethernet transceivers communicating over a bi-directional transmission channel, according to the prior art. An exemplary transmission channel includes four pairs of copper wire 112, 114, 116, 118. The transceiver pair can be referred to as link partners, and includes a first Ethernet port 100 and a second Ethernet port 105. Both of the Ethernet ports 100, 105 include four transmitter TX, receiver RX, and I/O buffering sections corresponding to each of the pairs of copper wires 112, 114, 116, 118.


The twisted copper wires can operate as antennas that are susceptible to receive electromagnetic interference (EMI). Generally, the EMI appears as a narrowband interference source to Ethernet receivers. Typically, Ethernet systems mostly rely on EMI protection that is provided by shielding, and by transmitting the information differentially to provide immunity against the common-mode characteristics of the EMI. Higher frequency EMI can be partially rejected by the filtering performed at the analog-front end (AFE) of the Ethernet receiver. Additionally, in the past, Ethernet systems had sufficient operating margin such that the EMI did not cause the link to fail.


However, the immunity of current Ethernet systems (higher frequency systems) to EMI is not sufficient, and the EMI can cause the link to fail, and be unable to transmit data. Suppression of EMI can be extremely challenging since the EMI usually appears at unknown times and with unknown frequency, bandwidth, power, modulation, duration, etc. Additionally, suppressing the EMI when the link is already transmitting data is extremely difficult since the EMI characteristics need to be determined very fast to be able to cancel the EMI before the link fails. Moreover, there is no training data to help detect and cancel the EMI since the link is transmitting real traffic.


It is desirable to have an apparatus and method for suppressing EMI of Ethernet systems to provide reliable link operation.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An embodiment includes a method of reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal. A signal is received over at least two conductors. A common-mode signal is extracted from the at least two conductors. The common-mode signal is processed and summed with the received signal, thereby reducing electromagnetic interference of the received signal.


Another embodiment includes a transceiver. The transceiver includes a receive port operative to receive a signal over at least two conductors, means for extracting a common-mode signal from the at least two conductors, a processor operative to process the common-mode signal, and a canceller operative to sum the processed common-mode signal with the received signal to reduce electromagnetic interference of the received signal.


Another embodiment includes another method of reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal. A signal is received over at least two conductors. A common-mode signal is extracted from the at least two conductors. Electromagnetic interference of the received signal is reduced using notch filtering, wherein the notch filtering is based at least in part on the processed common-mode signal.


Another embodiment includes another method of reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal. A signal is received over at least two conductors. A common-mode signal is extracted from the at least two conductors. Electromagnetic interference of the received signal is reduced using slicer error feedback, wherein the slicer-error feedback filtering is based at least in part on the processed common-mode signal.


Other aspects and advantages of the described embodiments will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of the described embodiments.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The described embodiments are readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements, and in which:



FIG. 1 shows a plurality of prior art Ethernet transceiver pairs.



FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal.



FIG. 3 shows another block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal.



FIG. 4 shows another block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal.



FIG. 5 shows another block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal.



FIG. 6 shows is block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference in a received signal, and additionally reduce transmit signal components of the received CM signal.



FIG. 7 shows is block diagram of another example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference in a received signal, and additionally reduce transmit signal components of the received CM signal.



FIG. 8 shows another block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal, and further provides reuse of processing circuitry.



FIG. 9 shows another block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal, and further provides reuse of processing circuitry, and includes a replica slicer.



FIG. 10 shows another block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal.



FIG. 11 shows another block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal.



FIG. 12 is a flow chart that includes an example of steps of a method of reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal.



FIG. 13 shows devices connected to an Ethernet network that can include embodiments of reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As shown in the drawings for purposes of illustration, the invention is embodied in an apparatus and methods for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal of a transceiver. The descriptions provided are generally focused on Ethernet transceivers, but the described embodiments can be used in other configurations of transceivers as well. It is to be understood that the electromagnetic signals can take different forms. That is the electromagnetic signals can couple into the receive signals wirelessly, through cables, through circuit boards, and/or through power supplies.



FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal. This embodiment includes N receiver ports, which as shown, can include a transformer 210. The transformer can be connected, for example, to a pair of copper wires, wherein four transformers are connected to four pairs of wires. Each of the receive signals includes an intended receive differential signal. However, the received signals typically include electromagnetic interference which typically includes both differential mode (DM) components and common mode (CM) components.


For this embodiment, a CM signal is generated by summing signals received from a pair of conductors (such as a pair of copper wires) at a summer 230. It should be noted that various methods can be used to extract the CM signal. For example, an embodiment includes tapping a center-tap of a transformer. Other methods can include extracting the CM signal before the transformer. The common mode signal is processed by processing circuitry 240. The differential mode signal is typically amplified by a programmable gain amplifier (PGA) 220. A summer (or canceller) 250 sums the received differential signal with the processed common mode signal to cancel at least a portion of the electromagnetic interference of the received differential signal. It is to be understood that EMI cancellation can be repeated for each of the N received signals, and that the CM signal processing can be different for each of the N received signals. Embodiments include converting the CM signal to a differential mode (DM) signal before, during or after the CM signal processing.


Effectively, the embodiment of FIG. 2 is an EMI canceller that is used to cancel EMI in, for example, a full-duplex Ethernet system. The cancellation process involves detecting the presence of the EMI, determining its characteristics, and then canceling the EMI. The EMI detection process relies on measuring the characteristics of various signals that are related to the EMI using, for example, power-meters or processing the outputs of a transform, such as a fast-Fourier-transform (FFT), performed on signals that have information about the EMI. The sensed CM signal can also be used to detect the presence of an EMI that afflicts the receive signal.



FIG. 3 shows another block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal. This embodiment shows additional details of an implementation of the CM signal processing.


As shown, an ADC (analog to digital converter) 310 samples the CM signal. A frequency estimator 320 estimates a frequency of at least one frequency component of the CM signal.


The frequency estimator 320 can employ multiple methods for EMI frequency estimation. Possible methods include time-domain methods, filter bank structures, linear prediction methods, frequency-domain interpolation methods, iterative detection and estimation, and many more methods.


The frequency estimate is used by a controller 340 to generate filter components (coefficients) of a band-pass filter 350. An embodiment of the band-pass filter includes an IIR (infinite impulse response) filter. For an embodiment, the band-pass filter 350 is tuned to have a pass-band that is centered at the estimated frequency of the electromagnetic interference. The controller 340 selects the filter components to define the center frequency and bandwidth of the band-pass filter 350.


For an embodiment, the band-pass filtered CM signal is additionally filtered by, for example, an FIR (finite impulse response) filter 360. The output of the filter 360 is summed with the received signal to cancel at least a portion of the electromagnetic interference.



FIG. 4 shows another block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal. This embodiment further includes a notch filter 410 for directly notch filtering out at least a portion of the electromagnetic interference in the received differential signal. As shown, components of the notch filter 410 can be determined at least in part by the processor 240. More specifically, the estimated frequency of at least one electromagnetic interference source can be estimated as previously described. This frequency estimate can be used to influence the center frequency and bandwidth of the notch filter 410, and thereby cancel at least a portion of the electromagnetic interference.



FIG. 5 shows another block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal. This embodiment additionally includes a slicer 510. The slicer 510 decodes the receive signal and additionally generates an error signal. The error signal can be filtered with a band-pass filter 520 and the output of the filter 520 can be summed at, for example, the summer 250 to reduce at least a portion of the electromagnetic interference or some other narrowband distortion that was generated as part of the process of canceling the EMI (for example, narrowband common-mode return loss, narrowband ISI caused by notching, etc). The band-pass filter 520 can be configured base at least in part upon the estimated frequency of the electromagnetic interference.


The slicer makes decisions about the transmitted information, and can include channel decoding, multi-dimensional decoding, or just single dimensional symbol-by-symbol decoding. The slicer decision is used to generate an estimate of the other signals present in the received signal besides the transmitted information. As such, the EMI signal present in the received signal will be contained in the slicer error. This slicer error could then be processed, or filtered by the band-pass filter 520, to generate an estimate of the EMI signal. The EMI signal estimate based on the processed slicer error could then be subtracted from the received signal to cancel at least a portion of the EMI in the received signal.



FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal, and additionally reduce transmit signal components of the received CM signal. Full duplex transmission can result in at least a portion of the transmit signal being coupled back into the receive CM signal. The portion of the transmit signal that couples back is referred to as a CM return-loss (RL) signal. It can be desirable to reduce a level of components of a transmit signal within the extracted common-mode signal. For an embodiment, reducing the level of components of the transmit signal within the extracted common-mode signal includes the transmit signals and summing the filtered transmit signals with the common-mode signal.



FIG. 6 includes a first filter (Filter 1) and a second filter (Filter 2). The first filter receives a first transmission signal (TX 1), and the second filter receives a second transmission signal (TX 2). The configuration (coefficients) of the first filter can be selected to estimate the CMRL signal contribution of the first transmission signal (TX 1), and the configuration (coefficients) of the second filter can be selected to estimate the CMRL contribution of the second transmission signal (TX 2). The first and second echo signal estimates can be summed with the CM signal to reduce at least a portion of the echo signal components within the CM signal.



FIG. 7 shows a block diagram of another example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference in a received signal, and additionally reduce transmit signal components of both the received CM signal and the received differential signal. FIG. 7 also includes a first filter (Filter 1) and a second filter (Filter 2). The first filter receives a first transmission signal (TX 1), and the second filter receives a second transmission signal (TX 2). The configuration (coefficients) of the first filter processing the first transmission signal (TX 1) can be selected to jointly estimate the CMRL signal components in the CM signal and the transmit signal components in the received differential signal. The configuration (coefficients) of the second filter processing the second transmission signal (TX 2) can be selected to jointly estimate the CMRL signal components in the CM signal and the transmit signal components in the received differential signal. The first and second echo signal estimates can be summed with the summed processed common-mode signal and received signal to reduce transmit signal components in the summed signal.



FIG. 8 shows another block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal, and further provides reuse of processing circuitry. The various embodiments described include various forms of band-pass filtering and FIR filtering. An embodiment includes a utilization of common hardware in the implementation of the various band-pass (typically, IIR) and the FIR filtering. A MUX 840 provides selectivity between filtering the CM signal, the DM received signal and the slicer error (from slicer 810) with a band-pass filter 850 and an FIR 860. By using common hardware (electronic circuitry) for the filtering, power and space savings can be realized.



FIG. 9 shows another block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal, and further provides reuse of processing circuitry, and includes a replica slicer 910. The replica slicer 910 can provide an independent “test output” in which the slicer error can be monitored or tested for different setting of configurations of the various band-pass and FIR filters or for use in improving the estimated frequency of the EMI. The output of the replica slicer 910 is independent of the decoding and slicer error of the slicer 810. Test circuitry 920 can monitor the output of the replica slicer 910, aiding in the selections of the configurations of the various band-pass and IIR filters. The proper selections should reduce the slicer error. The MUX 940 additionally receives an output of the test circuitry 920.



FIG. 10 shows another block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal. The embodiment includes the slicer error (after being band-pass filtered) of the slicer 510 being summed with the filtered (processed) common mode signal, and for aiding in the configuration and/or adaptive training of the FIR filter of the common mode signal. As previously shown and described, the CM signal is passed through an IIR filter 1050 and an FIR filter 1040. The configuration and/or adaptive training of the FIR 1040 are controlled at least in part by the slicer error. The control should reduce the slicer error.



FIG. 11 shows another block diagram of an example of a transceiver that can utilize the described embodiments for reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal. This embodiment does not include the common mode signal processing. The embodiment includes reducing the electromagnetic interference through a combination of band-pass filtering (IIR Band-Pass Filter 350) the received (differential mode) signal and IIR/band-pass filtering (Band-Pass Filter 520) of the slicer error. The band-pass filtered received signal is negatively summed with the received signal to cancel at least a portion of the electromagnetic interference. The band-pass filters of the received signal and of the slicer error signal are tuned to the frequency of the electromagnetic interference.



FIG. 12 is a flow chart that includes an example of steps of a method of reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal. A first step 1210 includes receiving a signal over at least two conductors. A second step 1220 includes extracting a common-mode signal from the at least two conductors. A third step 1230 includes processing the common-mode signal. A fourth step 1240 includes reducing electromagnetic interference of the received signal, comprising summing the processed common-mode signal with the received signal.


For an embodiment, a frequency of the electromagnetic interference signal is estimated based on the common-mode signal. The above-described processing can utilize the frequency of the electromagnetic interference signal. More specifically, for an embodiment, the processing includes configuring a band-pass filter based upon the frequency of the electromagnetic interference signal, and wherein processing the common-mode signal comprises filtering the common mode signal with the band-pass filter. For a specific embodiment, the band-pass filter comprises an infinite impulse response filter. A center frequency, a bandwidth and a gain of the band-pass filter is based on the extracted common-mode signal. More specifically, the band-pass filter is configured based on the extracted common-mode signal by estimating at least one of a strength, a bandwidth, or noise level of the extracted common mode signal, or an estimate of an accuracy of the estimate of the frequency of the electromagnetic interference signal.


For an embodiment, the band-pass common mode signal is further processed by filtering the band-pass filtered common mode signal with N finite impulse response filters, generating a filtered output for each of N signals received over N of the at least two conductors (for example, twisted pairs of copper wire). Each of the N finite impulse response filters is adapted based on a corresponding differential signal of the received signal that includes the electromagnetic interference. Each of the N filtered outputs can be summed with a corresponding one of N signals received over N at least two conductors.


As previously described, an embodiment further includes notch filtering the receive signal, wherein a center frequency, bandwidth and/or gain of the notch filter is based on an estimate of a frequency of an electromagnetic interference signal. For an embodiment, the estimate of the frequency of the electromagnetic interference signal is based on the common-mode signal.


As previously described, an embodiment further includes determining an error of a slicer that decodes the receive signal and cancelling the electromagnetic interference based on the error. For a specific embodiment, the error is used to cancel the electromagnetic interference if the error is below a threshold. For embodiments, the presence of EMI, the frequency, the amplitude, and other EMI properties are determined based on the slicer error. The slicer makes decisions about the transmitted information, and thus the slicer error includes the other receive signals besides the transmitted information. The EMI signal present in the received differential signal is part of the slicer error, and processing the slicer error can therefore be used to detect the presence of the EMI signal, and determine its characteristics. The frequency of the EMI signal can be determined by determining strong frequency components in the slicer error using, for example, fast-Fourier-transform (FFT) processing to examine the frequency domain content of the slicer error signal.


As previously described, an embodiment further includes reducing a level of components of a transmit signal within the extracted common-mode signal. For a specific embodiment, reducing the level of components of the transmit signal within the extracted common-mode signal includes filtering the transmit signal and summing the filtered transmit signal with the common-mode signal.


The electromagnetic interference can include multiple sources of interference that include multiple interfering frequencies. An embodiment additionally includes estimating frequencies of multiple electromagnetic interference signals, and adapting band-pass filter configurations based at least in part on the frequencies.


An embodiment includes utilization of common hardware in the implementation of the various band-pass (typically, IIR) and the FIR filtering. Specifically, this embodiment includes estimating a frequency of the electromagnetic interference signal based on the common-mode signal, notch filtering the receive signal, wherein a center frequency of the notch filter is based on the estimate of a frequency of an electromagnetic interference signal. Further, determining an error of a slicer that decodes the receive signal, filtering the error and cancelling the electromagnetic interference based on the filtered error. Further, configuring a band-pass filter based upon the estimate of the frequency of the electromagnetic interference signal, and wherein processing the common-mode signal comprises filtering the common mode signal with the band-pass filter, wherein the notch filter, error filtering and the band-pass filter share filtering circuit hardware. With different combinations of filtering in place and easy to reconfigure, an embodiment include a replica slicer generating a replica slicer error for testing different combinations of the notch filtering, the error filtering and the common mode filtering.


A Network of Devices



FIG. 13 shows devices connected to an Ethernet network that can include embodiments of reducing electromagnetic interference of a receive signal of a transceiver. The network includes a server/computer 1310, a switch 1320 and storage 1330 that can all benefit from reducing electromagnetic interference of a receive signal of a transceiver 1340. The server/computer 1310 can be connected to the switch 1320 through an Ethernet twisted pair LAN connection. The switch 1320 can additionally be connected to the storage 1330 through an Ethernet twisted pair LAN connection. The transceivers 1340 within the server/computer 1310, the switch 1320, and the storage 1330 can provide reduction electromagnetic interference.


Although specific embodiments of the invention have been described and illustrated, the invention is not to be limited to the specific forms or arrangements of parts so described and illustrated. The invention is limited only by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of reducing electromagnetic interference of a received signal, comprising: receiving a signal over at least two conductors, the at least two conductors defining one of a plurality of physical channels for an Ethernet transceiver circuit;extracting a common-mode signal from the at least two conductors;processing the common-mode signal;estimating a frequency of the electromagnetic interference to generate a cancellation signal by filtering the common-mode signal with an infinite impulse response (IIR) filter;notch filtering the receive signal, wherein a center frequency of the notch filter is based on the estimate of the frequency of the interference signal; andreducing the electromagnetic interference of the received signal by summing the cancellation signal with the received signal after notch filtering.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising configuring a center frequency, a bandwidth and a gain of the IIR filter based on the extracted common-mode signal.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein configuring the IIR filter based on the extracted common-mode signal comprises estimating at least one of a strength, a bandwidth, or noise level of the extracted common mode signal, or estimating an accuracy of the estimate of the frequency of the electromagnetic interference signal.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein processing the common-mode signal further comprises filtering the common mode signal with N finite impulse response filters, generating a filtered output for each of N signals received over N of the at least two conductors.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein each of the N finite impulse response filters is adapted based on a corresponding differential signal of the received signal that includes the electromagnetic interference.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, further comprising summing each of the N filtered outputs with a corresponding one of N signals received over N at least two conductors.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining an error of a slicer that decodes the receive signal and wherein extracting the common-mode signal includes estimating the common-mode signal based on the slicer error and cancelling the electromagnetic interference based on the error.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the error is used to cancel the electromagnetic interference if the error is below a threshold.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining an error of a slicer that decodes the receive signal, and wherein an estimate of the frequency of the electromagnetic interference signal is based on the error of the slicer.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising reducing a level of components of a transmit signal within the extracted common-mode signal.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein reducing the level of components of the transmit signal within the extracted common-mode signal comprises filtering the transmit signal and summing the filtered transmit signal with the common-mode signal.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising reducing a level of components of a transmit signal within the summed processed common-mode signal and received signal.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, further comprising estimating frequencies of multiple interference signals, and adapting IIR filter configurations based at least in part on the frequencies.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining an error of a slicer that decodes the receive signal;an error filter filtering the error and cancelling the electromagnetic interference based on the filtered error;whereinthe notch filter, error filter and the band-pass filter share filtering circuit hardware.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, further comprising a replica slicer generating a replica slicer error for testing different combinations of the notch filtering, the error filtering and the common mode filtering.
  • 16. An Ethernet transceiver comprising: a receive port operative to receive a signal having signal components over at least two conductors;a summer for summing the signal components and extracting a common-mode signal from the at least two conductors;a processor operative to process the common-mode signal;an infinite impulse response (IIR) filter operative to filter the common-mode signal to generate a cancellation signal, wherein the IIR filter is configured based upon a frequency of an interference signal;a notch filter, the notch filter filtering the receive signal, wherein a center frequency of the notch filter is based on an estimate of the frequency of the interference signal; anda canceller operative to sum the cancellation signal with the received signal after notch filtering to reduce electromagnetic interference of the received signal.
  • 17. The transceiver of claim 16, further comprising N finite impulse response filters, each of the N finite impulse response filters receiving an output of the IIR filter and generating a filtered output for each of N signals received over N of the at least two conductors.
  • 18. The transceiver of claim 17, wherein each of the N finite impulse response filters is adapted based on a corresponding differential signal of the received signal that includes the electromagnetic interference.
  • 19. The transceiver of claim 18, further comprising a summer that sums each of the N filtered outputs with a corresponding one of N signals received over N at least two conductors.
  • 20. The transceiver of claim 16, further comprising: a slicer, the slicer decoding the receive signal and generating a slicer error;a canceller for cancelling the electromagnetic interference with the slicer error.
  • 21. The transceiver of claim 16, further comprising: a notch filter for filtering the receive signal, wherein a center frequency of the notch filter is based on an estimate of a frequency of an electromagnetic interference signal;a slicer for decoding the filtered receive signal and generating a slicer error;a filter for filtering the slicer error;a canceller for summing the receive signal and the slicer error for cancelling at least a portion of electromagnetic interference;andthe canceller additionally summing the filtered common mode signal with the filtered receive signal for cancelling at least a portion of electromagnetic interference.
US Referenced Citations (111)
Number Name Date Kind
3506906 Nestor Apr 1970 A
3671859 Miller Jun 1972 A
4797902 Nishiguchi et al. Jan 1989 A
4870370 Hedberg et al. Sep 1989 A
5157690 Buttle Oct 1992 A
5283811 Chennakeshu et al. Feb 1994 A
5550924 Helf et al. Aug 1996 A
5777692 Ghosh Jul 1998 A
5832032 Overbury Nov 1998 A
5889511 Ong et al. Mar 1999 A
5910960 Claydon et al. Jun 1999 A
5995566 Rickard et al. Nov 1999 A
5995567 Cioffi et al. Nov 1999 A
6011508 Perreault et al. Jan 2000 A
6035360 Doidge et al. Mar 2000 A
6052420 Yeap et al. Apr 2000 A
6069917 Werner et al. May 2000 A
6285718 Reuven Sep 2001 B1
6385315 Viadella et al. May 2002 B1
6424234 Stevenson Jul 2002 B1
6486746 Gilbert Nov 2002 B1
6683913 Kantschuk Jan 2004 B1
6690739 Mui Feb 2004 B1
6711207 Amrany et al. Mar 2004 B1
6734659 Fortner May 2004 B1
6771720 Yang et al. Aug 2004 B1
6924724 Grilo et al. Aug 2005 B2
6934345 Chu et al. Aug 2005 B2
6959056 Yeap et al. Oct 2005 B2
6999504 Amrany et al. Feb 2006 B1
7026730 Marshall et al. Apr 2006 B1
7031402 Takada Apr 2006 B2
7103013 Kim et al. Sep 2006 B1
7123117 Chen et al. Oct 2006 B2
7164764 Zimmerman et al. Jan 2007 B2
7173992 Frigon Feb 2007 B2
7180940 Li et al. Feb 2007 B2
7200180 Verbin et al. Apr 2007 B2
7315592 Tsatsanis et al. Jan 2008 B2
7333603 Sallaway et al. Feb 2008 B1
RE40149 Vitenberg Mar 2008 E
7440892 Tamura Oct 2008 B2
7457386 Phanse Nov 2008 B1
7459982 Miao Dec 2008 B2
7492840 Chan Feb 2009 B2
7522928 O'Mahony Apr 2009 B2
7542528 Cheong Jun 2009 B1
7634032 Chu et al. Dec 2009 B2
7656956 King Feb 2010 B2
7706434 Farjadrad Apr 2010 B1
7708595 Chow et al. May 2010 B2
8094546 Schenk Jan 2012 B2
8139602 Meier Mar 2012 B2
8284007 Langner et al. Oct 2012 B1
8320411 Sedarat et al. Nov 2012 B1
8331508 Dabiri Dec 2012 B2
8472532 Schley-May et al. Jun 2013 B2
8625704 Sedarat et al. Jan 2014 B1
20030186591 Jensen et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030223488 Li et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030223505 Verbin et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040010203 Bibian et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040023631 Deutsch et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040164619 Parker et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040213366 Ono Oct 2004 A1
20040239465 Chen et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040252755 Jaffe et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040257743 Chen et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050018777 Azadet Jan 2005 A1
20050025266 Chan Feb 2005 A1
20050053229 Tsatsanis et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050097218 Sultenfuss et al. May 2005 A1
20050123081 Shirani Jun 2005 A1
20050135489 Ho et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050203744 Tamura Sep 2005 A1
20050243483 Chen et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060018388 Chan Jan 2006 A1
20060056503 Keshab et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060159186 King Jul 2006 A1
20060182014 Lusky et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060256880 Frisch Nov 2006 A1
20070014378 Parhi et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070081475 Telado et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070146011 O'Mahony et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070192505 Dalmia Aug 2007 A1
20070258517 Rollings et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070280388 Torre et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080089433 Cho et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080095283 Shoor Apr 2008 A1
20080107167 Tung et al. May 2008 A1
20080160915 Sommer et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080198909 Tsatsanis et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080267212 Crawley et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090061808 Higgins Mar 2009 A1
20090097401 Diab Apr 2009 A1
20090097539 Furman et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090154455 Diab Jun 2009 A1
20090161781 Kolze Jun 2009 A1
20100046543 Parnaby Feb 2010 A1
20100073072 Ullen et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100074310 Roo et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100086019 Agazzi et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100111202 Schley-May et al. May 2010 A1
20100159866 Fudge et al. Jun 2010 A1
20110032048 Wu et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110069794 Tavassoli Kilani et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110106459 Chris et al. May 2011 A1
20110212692 Hahn Sep 2011 A1
20110256857 Chen et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110293041 Luo et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110296267 Malkin et al. Dec 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
WO 9740587 Oct 1997 WO
WO2011056970 May 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 12/563,938, filed Sep. 21, 2009, Sedarat.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/604,323, filed Oct. 22, 2009, Sedarat et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/604,434, filed Oct. 22, 2009, Farjadrad et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/604,351, filed Oct. 22, 2009, Sedarat et al.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110296267 A1 Dec 2011 US