Asynchronous data transfers have become very common in many integrated circuit devices, such as ASICs and SoCs, today. In particular, various components or subsystems utilized for the construction of an integrated circuit may independently operate at different frequencies, such as in microprocessors and micro-controllers, where certain components or subsystems have a faster rate of operation than the operating frequencies of other system components or subsystems. Therefore, typically, it is desirable to devise integrated circuits with the ability to support multiple domains, which may operate at different frequencies.
For instance, many integrated circuits include a number of electronic circuits referred to as “clocked logic domains” that operate independently based on electrical “timing” or “clock” signals. Such clock signals are used to control and coordinate the activities of various components or subsystems.
Since there will not be a fixed relationship between the active edge of the launch clock and the capture clock, there is a possibility of having setup or hold violations in the capture flip-flop, causing meta-stability. To avoid meta-stability in asynchronous data transfer, a commonly adopted technique is to double latch (also called double stage synchronization, or double flopping) the clock domain crossing signal at the receive domain clock frequency. Double flopping involves passing an asynchronous signal(s) through a pair of edge triggered D-Flip-flops or some equivalent storage element. If the receiving clock frequency is considerably less than the transmitting clock frequency, there is a huge latency involved in the double flopping process, often up to 20 or more clock cycles in the higher frequency domain. This situation frequently arises with slower devices, like a Flash Memory controller, being used in ASICs that have a majority of the components running at a much higher clock frequency.
Any reduction in the clock domain-crossing overhead tremendously reduces the data transfer latencies and increases the overall system performance.
An object of this invention is to reduce the latency in data transfer between asynchronous clock domains.
Another object of the present invention is to reduce crossing overhead in data transfer between asynchronous clock domains.
A further object of the invention is to run registers, which are used to transfer data between source and receiving clock domains, at a frequency that is source synchronized with the lower frequency clock of the receiving domain.
These and other objectives are attained with a method of, and an interfacing circuit for, transmitting data between a first clock domain operating at a first clock frequency C1 and a second clock domain operating at a second clock frequency C2. In accordance with this invention, data is transmitted from the first domain, through an interfacing circuitry, and to the second domain. The interfacing circuitry includes a synchronization section that operates at a third frequency C3, wherein C3 is a whole number multiple of C2. For example, C3 may be an even whole number multiple of C2.
In the preferred embodiment, a clock signal A is used to operate the second clock domain at frequency C2, and a clock signal B is used to operate the second section of the interfacing circuitry at frequency C3. Each of the clock signals A and B have regular, active edge portions, and each occurrence of one of the active edge portions of clock signal A is clock aligned with one of the active edge portions of clock signal B. In particular, in this preferred embodiment, clock signals A and B are source synchronized.
Preferably, the synchronization section of the interfacing circuitry includes first and second registers. Clock signal B is applied to both the first and second registers to operate these registers at frequency C3.
For example, in an asynchronous data transfer, the higher clock frequency that launches data may be C1 and the lower clock frequency that captures data may be C2. In accordance with this invention, the interface flip-flops used for double flopping run at a higher source synchronous clock frequency C3. C3 is source synchronized with the low frequency clock C2, and C3 and C2 will always have a common active edge and will be considered synchronous. Since each occurrence of the active edge of the capture clock (the slow clock) will have the active edge of the source synchronous clock aligned with it, there will not be a chance of meta-stability occurring. Clocks are typically classified as source synchronous if they are derived from the same phase locked loop (PLL) and are in phase.
With this preferred embodiment of the invention, the higher the frequency of clock C3, the less the latency becomes. The limitation on the upper limit for a source synchronous clock C3 is the minimum clock period needed to overcome the meta-stability, as stated in the flip-flop specification.
In an embodiment of the invention described below in detail, by using a source synchronous clock running at a higher (say 8X) frequency to double flop the signal at the interface, the latency is reduced to about 8 clock cycles in the receive clock frequency (compared to a latency of 25 clock cycles without using this technique). There is about a 70% improvement in the latency, which enhances the overall system performance. The data transfer rates across the asynchronous interface are tremendously improved.
Further benefits and advantages of this invention will become apparent from a consideration of the following detailed description, given with reference to the accompanying drawings, which specify and show preferred embodiments of the invention.
The destination domain is controlled by a clock signal referred to as Clock A, and the source domain is controlled by a clock signal referred to as Clock S. In the example system 100 of
In the embodiment shown in
The Registers 114 and 116 receive the data bit signals (or a control signal that qualifies the data bits) from register 120, and are used for double flopping the clock domain crossing signal(s). The Registers 114 and 116 represent any type of a storage component including a D-Flip-flop or any similar type of edge triggered storage element. In system 100, Registers 114 and 116 operate at a frequency X,
The Ack A signal of clock domain 104 goes high at time T5, which occurs at the next rising edge of clock A. This Ack A signal is applied to source domain 102, and is double flopped with the Clock S and appears as Ack B at the component B, at time T6. Valid B then goes low at time T7; and Valid B from Register 120 goes low at the next rising edge of clock S, at time T8. Valid B from Register 116 goes low at the next rising edge of clock A, which occurs at time T9; and Valid B from Register 114 and Valid A at Component A both go low at the next rising edge of clock A, which occurs at time T10.
With the above described procedure, by double latching at the receive clock frequency, there is a latency of about 25 clock cycles in the transmit clock domain, in the example where the clocks frequency ratio is 8.5X and X. The latency could be more or less depending on the ratio of the clock frequencies.
In particular,
The Ack A signal of destination domain 104 goes high at time T15, which occurs at the next rising edge of clock A. This Ack A signal from clock domain 104 is double flopped with the Clock S and appears as Ack B at the source domain at time T16. Valid B of source domain 102 then goes low at the next rising edge of clock S, at time T17; and Valid B from Register 120 goes low at the next rising edge of clock S, at time T18. Valid B from Register 116 goes low at the next rising edge of clock B, which occurs at time T19; and Valid B from Register 114 and Valid A of destination domain 104 both go low at the next rising edge of clock B, which occurs at time T20. Ack A then goes low at the next rising edge of signal A, at time T21.
By using a source synchronous clock running at a higher (say 8X) frequency to double latch the signal at the interface, the latency is reduced to about 8 clock cycles in the receive clock frequency (compared to a latency of 25 clocks without using this technique). There is about a 70% improvement in the latency; which enhances the overall system performance. The data transfer rates across the asynchronous interface are tremendously improved.
Using a synchronous clock running at a higher frequency to double flop at the asynchronous boundary reduces the double flopping latency to a considerable extent.
Usually, the source synchronous clock will be an even multiple of the receive domain clock (lower freq clock, X), i.e., 2X, 4X, 6X, 8X, etc. The highest possible frequency will be determined by the minimum time needed by the flip-flop to overcome the meta-stability, as specified in the manufactures specification.
It should be noted that, while two D-flip-flops are shown in the preferred embodiment, the invention could be extended to any number (one or more) of flip-flops in the section of the interfacing circuitry operating at the third frequency C3. Also, any edge (rising or falling) can be used as an active edge trigger for any of the synchronizing flip-flops described in the interfacing circuitry. In addition, register 120 may be considered optional in cases where it is known that the asynchronous signal is directly launched off an edge triggered storage element in the Component B.
While it is apparent that the invention herein disclosed is well calculated to fulfill the objects stated above, it will be appreciated that numerous modifications and embodiments may be devised by those skilled in the art, and it is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and embodiments as fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5202936 | Kobiyama | Apr 1993 | A |
5237668 | Blandy et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5535377 | Parks | Jul 1996 | A |
5548620 | Rogers | Aug 1996 | A |
5602878 | Cross | Feb 1997 | A |
5644604 | Larson | Jul 1997 | A |
5793227 | Goldrian | Aug 1998 | A |
6112307 | Ajanovic et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6414903 | Keeth et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425088 | Yasukawa et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6499280 | Tsutsui | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6535946 | Bryant et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6603336 | Kessler et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629254 | Naqvi et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633991 | Goldrian | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6735712 | Maiyuran et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6799280 | Edenfield et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6850092 | Chelcea et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6867630 | Talledo et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6900665 | Ma | May 2005 | B2 |
6904553 | Brown | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6906555 | Ma | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6910145 | MacLellan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6949955 | Glasser | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954869 | Syed | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7010713 | Roth et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027542 | Shihadeh | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7036038 | Urzi et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7096375 | Wakayama et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107393 | Sabih | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7123674 | Mackey et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7149916 | Marino | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7191354 | Purho | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7289946 | Lee | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7296174 | Kelly | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7363526 | Chong et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7382824 | Marmash et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7500132 | Pothireddy et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7583106 | Cumming et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20020087909 | Hummel et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20060106863 | Ramasamy Venkatraj et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060274870 | Wielage | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060277329 | Paulson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282251 | Schuppe | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070064852 | Jones et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073877 | Boykin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070139085 | Elliot et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070208980 | Gregorius et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080150605 | Chueh et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090271651 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |