Patent Grant
8095288
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to a motor vehicle driveline and, more particularly to an all-wheel-drive (AWD) powertrain that transmits power continually to the wheels of a primary axle and selectively to the wheels of a secondary axle.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Driveline oscillations can occur when a vehicle equipped with front wheel drive (FWD) based AWD accelerates on a surface having a low coefficient of friction, such as a surface covered with ice or snow. During an aggressive acceleration on the surface, front and rear tires begin to slip at different times causing energy stored in the driveline to be released and the vehicle driveline to oscillate torsionally. The driveline oscillations can cause premature failure of driveline components and noise and vibration inside the vehicle.
These oscillations occur when the rear wheel speeds over-run the front wheel speeds in an active clutch based AWD system.
Unsatisfactory solutions include merely reducing the noise through increased use of sound deadening materials and truncating the peak torque commanded by the AWD system.
A need exists in the industry for a technique that detects the speed over-run, releases the energy stored in the driveline and reduces the torque in the AWD system.
A method for reducing oscillations in a vehicle driveline includes transmitting torque to secondary wheels of the vehicle, determining a first rate of change in speed between the secondary wheels and primary wheels, if a second rate of change in speed between secondary wheels and primary wheels is greater than the first rate of change, reducing torque transmitted to the secondary wheels proportional to a ratio of the first rate of change and the second rate of change, and if the second rate of change is less than the first rate of change, using differential and proportional control to change said torque.
The invention contemplates a system for controlling a vehicle driveline including primary wheels and secondary wheels, a clutch for transmitting torque to the secondary wheels, and a controller configured to determine a first rate of change in speed between the secondary wheels and primary wheels; reduce said torque in proportion to a ratio of the first rate of change and the second rate of change, if a second rate of change in speed between secondary wheels and primary wheels is greater than the first rate of change; and use differential and proportional control to change said torque, if the second rate of change is less than the first rate of change.
The oscillation control and system detect the over-run and releases the energy stored in the driveline by reducing the torque in the AWD system.
An AWD clutch converts energy stored in the driveline to heat as the clutch slips. This controlled release or dissipation of energy in the driveline eliminates noise and vibration helping to increase the service life of the driveline components.
The scope of applicability of the preferred embodiment will become apparent from the following detailed description, claims and drawings. It should be understood, that the description and specific examples, although indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only. Various changes and modifications to the described embodiments and examples will become apparent to those skilled in the art.
The invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following description, taken with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring now to the drawings, there is illustrated in
A driveshaft 20 transmits rotating power from the transmission 16 to the rear wheels 22, 23 through a clutch assembly 24 and a rear inter-wheel differential 26, which transmits one-half of its input torque to each of the rear wheels 22, 23.
Speed sensors each transmit to a powertrain control unit (PCU) 32, a signal 28-31 representing the rotational speed of a respective front wheel or rear wheel. PCU 32 includes a microprocessor accessible to electronic memory containing constants, variables and parameters related to operation of the vehicle and powertrain, and vehicle control algorithms expressed in computer code, which algorithms are executed repeatedly at frequent intervals.
When coil 36 is energized, a plate 46, actuated through a ball ramp 48, forces the clutch plates 40, 44 into mutual frictional contact, thereby driveably connecting housing 38 and shaft 42. An output 50, connected to shaft 42, is driveably connected to the input of the rear differential mechanism 26. The operating state of clutch 24 varies among full locked or closed, partially locked or slipping, and fully unlocked or open.
An algorithm for reducing oscillations in the motor vehicle driveline is illustrated in
If the result of test 60 is logically false, control passes to step 64 where execution of the oscillation control algorithm is terminated.
If the result of test 60 is logically true, at step 66 a flag is set to indicate that the oscillation control is active.
At step 68, the AWD commanded torque transmitted by clutch 24 to the rear differential 26 is reduced by a magnitude that is proportional to a change in the average rear wheel speed minus the average front wheel speed that occurs during a time interval, whose length is preferably the length of the sampling interval.
A test is performed at step 70 to determine if the oscillation control is active and the accelerator pedal position is greater than the reference pedal position.
If the result of test 70 is false, at step 72 a flag is set to indicate that the oscillation control is inactive, and a smooth transition from oscillation control torque of clutch 24 back to normal control is performed. Then control returns to step 64 where execution of the oscillation control algorithm is terminated.
If the result of test 70 is true, a test is performed at step 74 to determine if the change in the average rear wheel speed minus the average front wheel speed during the most recent sampling interval is less than that change during at least one of the previous sampling intervals.
If the result of test 74 is false, control returns to step 68.
If the result of test 74 is true, at step 76 the AWD torque transmitted by clutch 24 is set equal to the commanded torque transmitted by clutch 24 during the previous execution of the oscillation reduction algorithm plus a differential gain multiplied by the change in the average rear wheel speed minus the average front wheel speed during the corresponding sampling interval plus a proportional gain multiplied by the difference between average rear wheel speed—the average front wheel speed.
At step 78 a test is performed to determine whether the oscillation control AWD commanded torque transmitted by clutch 24 is greater than a reference control AWD commanded torque) or whether the position of accelerator pedal 62 is less than a reference accelerator pedal position.
If the result of test 78 is false, control returns to step 74.
If the result of test 74 is true, at step 80 a flag is set indicating that the oscillation control is inactive, and a smoothly transition from oscillation control back to normal control is performed. Thereafter, control returns to step 64.
The invention has been described with reference to a vehicle in which the principal axle, i.e., the front wheels 12, 13, are continually driven while the vehicle is operating and the secondary axle, i.e., the rear wheels 22, 23, are driven selectively through the clutch assembly under control of the PCU 32. The invention can be applied also to a vehicle whose rear wheels 12, 13 are continually driven while the vehicle is operating and the front wheels 12, 13, are driven selectively through a clutch assembly under control of an electronic controller.
In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes, the preferred embodiment has been described. However, it should be noted that the alternate embodiments can be practiced otherwise than as specifically illustrated and described.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5690002 | Showalter | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5803197 | Hara et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5850616 | Matsuno et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 6533090 | Osborn et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6699151 | Grogg et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6725989 | Krisher et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6729426 | Suzuki | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6770005 | Aikawa et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6848550 | Puiu et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6935455 | Murakami et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6991585 | Colvin et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7024290 | Zhao et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7124850 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 20020087252 | Shimizu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20040078129 | Matsuno et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20080234906 | Warner | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100268429 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
