The present application is a U.S. National Phase of International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/IB2014/060095, entitled “Reductant Injection in an Exhaust System,” filed on Mar. 24, 2014, which claims priority to Great Britain Patent Application No. 1306688.1, filed on Apr. 12, 2013, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
The present invention relates to a system for injecting a fluid reductant into an exhaust system, a method of operating the system, and a flow guide for use in the system.
To reduce NOx levels in exhaust systems, notably diesel exhaust systems, it is known to inject a reductant into the exhaust gas upstream of a Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) module. The reductant converts NOx to nitrogen gas and water in the presence of the SCR. Typical reductants used are ammonia or urea, with urea generally preferred for safety and handling reasons. Urea is converted to ammonia through thermal decomposition.
The liquid reductant (for example aqueous urea) may be injected by a liquid-only dosing system, or by means of an air-assisted dosing system. Air-assisted dosing provides a smaller and more uniform droplet size through a centerline injection.
A problem with such reductant injection is that the mist of droplets from the injector tip may deposit on the wall of the exhaust pipe. This reduces the efficiency of the process and, in the case of urea and low-temperature operation, can lead to deposits which partly or completely block the exhaust pipe. A high concentration of droplets on or near the wall presents a significant challenge to mix and give an even distribution of the reductant in the exhaust gas at the SCR catalyst.
It has been proposed in U.S. 2010/0212292, to provide a feed connector through which the reductant is injected and which is provided with an inlet opening for generating additional gas flow along the inner wall of the feed connector to provide a gas barrier for preventing mist droplets from depositing on the inside wall of the feed connector or the exhaust pipe. WO 2011/106487 discloses a system for injecting a liquid reductant into an exhaust gas via an internal cone disposed in and generally parallel to the exhaust pipe. A reductant injector is in fluid communication with the cone. The cone has holes to permit inward flow of exhaust gas for creating a drag force on the injected liquid reductant. The drag force is said to increase the travel time of droplets from the injector to the SCR catalytic converter, allowing greater heating and consequently greater evaporation and/or thermal decomposition of the urea or other reductant.
Injecting aqueous urea reductant liquid on a bend in the exhaust pipe has a number of performance and practical benefits, including maximizing the downstream mixing length, providing more packaging flexibility and reducing injector temperature issues. However, placing the injector on the bend results in the majority of the spray following the main exhaust flow, particularly if the droplets are fine (as in air-assist injection systems). Even with high initial injection droplet velocity, the droplet inertia is small in comparison to the drag forces exerted by the main exhaust flow. The result of this is that the majority of droplets impinge on the wall of the exhaust pipe, losing any benefits of the small droplets for mixing and breakdown to ammonia (on evaporation and turbulent dispersion).
Aspects of the invention are specified in the independent claims. Preferred features are specified in the dependent claims.
The invention will now be further described, by way of example only, with reference to the following drawings.
Referring to
An injector 12 is mounted to the exterior of the exhaust pipe and has an injector tip 28 (
The injector 12 in this example is an air assisted system, but the invention could also be used with an airless system and may provide an advantage of reduction in the risk of deposits building up on the injector tip 28.
It is preferred that the shield member 4 has a frustoconical shape, with the proximal end 14 being narrower than the distal end 16 so that the diverging internal walls more readily accommodate a diverging droplet spray from the injector tip 28 without the droplets coming into contact with the wall.
The system creates a more uniform flow around the injector 12 by separating a proportion of the exhaust flow and guiding it past the injector in a uniform flow. This process is aided by part of the gas flow being directed behind the shield member 4 and through the space 32 (
By ensuring that the diverted gas prescribes a path in which there is a smooth transition from the upstream flow, following the path of the bend, into the proximal end 14 of the shield member 4 from behind, most of the momentum of the diverted gas flow is available to provide a cushioning or shielding layer between the central mist of reductant droplets from the injector tip 28 and the interior surface of the shield member 4. The shielded mist of droplets is delivered from the distal end 16 of the shield member 4 to a centerline 26 of the exhaust pipe 18. The droplets are travelling substantially along the centerline 26, helping to reduce the likelihood of their impinging on the internal surface of the exhaust pipe and forming a liquid film. This also provides a good distribution of the droplets within the exhaust gas, reducing the further mixing required to give an even distribution of reductant within the exhaust flow, required for high NOx conversion. A simulation of the smooth transition of the diverted gas is shown in
Diverting some of the gas through the space 32 provides an additional cushion or shielding effect to deter reductant droplets from coming into contact with the downstream internal surface of the exhaust pipe 18 after the exit from the distal end 16 of the shield member 4. By reducing the formation of a liquid film, the risk of deposits and a consequent impact on NOx reduction is reduced.
Where the main exhaust flow (Outer Flow—
The vane 6 may direct 10-30% of gas from the main exhaust stream, preferably about 15%.
In simulations, we have found that the combination of the shield member 4 and vane 6 is sufficient to achieve the benefits of delivery of a greater proportion of reductant droplets to the catalyst 22 if the upstream geometry is such as to provide a smooth gas flow. However, if the upstream geometry is less than ideal, for example if the pipe has one or more bends upstream, the incoming gas flow may have an element of swirl that will tend to reduce the efficiency of the system by bringing reductant into contact with internal surfaces of the exhaust pipe.
To reduce the influence of upstream geometry, one or more flow straightening members 8, 10 may be mounted in relation to the shield member 4. In the present example, a pair of upper flow straightening members 8 is mounted on the vane 6 upstream of the shield member 4 and a pair of lower flow straightening members 10 is mounted on the vane 6 downstream of the shield member 4. In this embodiment, each flow straightening member is a wall or plate mounted on the vane 6 and disposed substantially perpendicularly to a local plane of the vane. Preferably the major planes of the or each flow straightening member are substantially parallel to the internal diameter of the exhaust pipe.
The exhaust system may be manufactured with the flow guide assembly 2 mounted in the exhaust pipe at a bend, and with the injector mounted so that the injector tip is in the shield member. However, it is envisaged that the flow guide assembly could be retrofitted to some exhaust systems to achieve the benefits of the invention. Accordingly, another aspect of the invention provides a flow guide assembly for mounting in an exhaust system.
The invention accordingly provides a system and method for improving the efficiency of delivery of reductant to SCR catalyst in an engine exhaust system.
The articles “a” and “an” are used herein to mean “at least one” unless the context otherwise requires.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1306688.1 | Apr 2013 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2014/060095 | 3/24/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/167443 | 10/16/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8511075 | Brown | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8745975 | Jaruvatee | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8747761 | Kageyama | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8756921 | Troxler | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8916101 | Iljima | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9217348 | Kimura | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20080022663 | Dodge | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100212292 | Rusch | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110113759 | Tilinski et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2465602 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2011106487 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Intellectual Property Office of Great Britain, Search Report Issued in Patent Application No. GB1306688.1, Date of Jun. 24, 2013, 1 page. |
ISA European Patent Office, International Search Report Issued in Patent Application No. PCT/IB2014/060095, Jul. 10, 2014, WIPO, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160047288 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |