This application is related to U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 12/056,520, entitled “Systems and Methods for Controlling the Power State of Remote Control Electronics,” filed on Mar. 27, 2008, which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full below.
The present invention relates generally to remote control electronics, and more particularly to an apparatus and method to conserve power consumption of remote control electronics.
Electronic devices are ubiquitous in society and can be found in everything from toaster ovens to set-top cable boxes. With the proliferation of integrated circuitry, these electronic devices are becoming more and more sophisticated. Many of these electronic devices—especially consumer electronic devices—include the ability to be remotely controlled by a user. The user expects to be able to harness the full functionality of the particular electronic device remotely, and therefore, the remote control electronics are also becoming more and more sophisticated. This increased sophistication of the remote control electronics presents special power consumption problems because the remote control electronics are usually battery powered.
Thus, there is a need for an apparatus and method for reducing power consumption of remote control electronics.
A remote control capable of controlling multiple pieces of remote electronic devices, such as a set-top box receiver, game console or a display screen, is disclosed. The remote control may control remote electronic devices, for example, by actuating buttons on the remote control, or by moving the remote control spatially with respect to the electronic device being controlled.
This remote control implements power saving features that include a capacitive sensor that selectively couples at least certain power consuming elements of the remote control electronics to a power source, which may be batteries. The capacitive sensor selectively couples the power consuming elements to the power source based on whether or not a user is holding the remote control.
One embodiment includes a device further including at least one control interface for controlling an electronic component, at least one power source, one or more motion sensors configured to sense a motion of the device; and a capacitive sensor selectively coupling the one or more batteries to the one or more motion sensors or other elements.
Another embodiment includes a method of operating a wireless remote control device, including the acts of generating one or more signals indicative of the wireless remote control device's motion, transmitting the one or more signals to one or more remote electronic devices, detecting a capacitance, comparing the capacitance to an expected value; and in the event the capacitance is within a range of expected values, entering a low power mode.
Yet another embodiment includes a broadcast receiver system including a set-top box receiver, a remote controlling device further including one or more buttons, one or more batteries, one or more motion sensors configured to indicate a user's movement with respect to a screen; and a capacitive sensor that selectively couples the one or more batteries to the one or more motion sensors.
The use of the same reference symbols in different drawings indicates similar or identical items.
The following discussion describes various embodiments that may reduce consumption in certain electronic devices. Although one or more of these embodiments may be described in detail, the embodiments disclosed should not be interpreted or otherwise used as limiting the scope of the disclosure, including the claims. In addition, one skilled in the art will understand that the following description has broad application, and the discussion of any embodiment is meant only to be exemplary, and is not intended to intimate that the scope of the disclosure, including the claims, is limited to these embodiments. References to “control interface” should be interpreted as including, but not limited to, buttons, touchpads, switches, and the like.
One embodiment takes the form of an apparatus for reducing power consumption in remote control electronics. The embodiment may include a remote control capable of controlling multiple pieces of remote electronic devices, such as a set-top box receiver or a display screen. Control may be exercised by, for example, actuating buttons on the remote control, contact with a touchpad, or may be through moving the remote control spatially with respect to the electronic device being controlled. For example, the remote control controls the position of objects and/or icons displayed on a display screen by moving the remote control spatially relative to the screen.
The embodiment may further include a capacitive sensor that selectively operationally couples at least certain power consuming elements of the remote control electronics to a power source based on whether a user is holding the remote control. Exemplary portions of the remote control device that may be selectively coupled to and from the power source include gyroscopes, accelerometers, touch pads, data link circuitry and so forth.
The remote control 100 and the remote electronic devices 200 communicate using many different signal types and communication protocols. For example, as shown in
The remote control 100 may be configured to provide the entire functionality of the remote electronic device being controlled. Referring still to the exemplary embodiment shown in
Referring back to
Alternatives to capacitive sensors may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, in some embodiments, inductive or resistive sensors may be used that detect the electrical properties of a user's body by forming an electrical network with the user's body.
Similarly, the capacitive sensors may be used on remote devices other than the handheld remote controls depicted in
Note that in the event that the distances d1 and d2 are not equal and/or different materials with different dielectric constants are used in the gaps between the positive and negative electrodes 310 and 320, then separate dielectric constants ∈1 and ∈2 may be reflected in the calculation as shown in Equation (2), below. In such a case, ∈1 reflects the dielectric constant of the material in the distance d1, and ∈2 reflects the dielectric constant of the material in the distance d2. In some embodiments, the value of CTOTAL is tuned by varying the thickness of the dielectrics of the material 330—i.e., modifying distances d1 and d2. For example, redundant electrodes may be implemented in place or in addition to either electrodes 310 or 320, and during operation the value of CTOTAL is tuned by selectively coupling in and out these redundant electrodes.
Referring still to
Referring again to
Alternatively, instead of microprocessor 400, a switch 415 (such as a single transistor) may be used to shut down any portion of remote control 100 based on the presence of a predetermined capacitance. Another alternative is that a device may have an enable/disable function that can be controlled by the sense circuitry 410. In yet another alternative, power to the remote control 100 may be provided via a voltage regulator in the event that the power required by the remote control does not match the power provided by the batteries 405. Accordingly, the switch 415 may be coupled to an enable/disable function of such a regulator instead of the batteries 405. In still other embodiments, during low power mode, the microprocessor 400 may adjust the frequency of communication between the transmitter/receiver block 115 and the device that the remote control 100 is controlling, or alternatively, the information communicated between the remote control 100 and the device that the remote control 100 is controlling.
The frequency with which algorithm 600 is executed by the remote control 100 may vary based on the operational state of the remote control 100. For example, if the remote control 100 is in a low power mode algorithm 600 may be executed less frequently (based on value of initiated timer) than if the remote control 100 is “woken up”.
The foregoing merely illustrates the principles of the invention. Various modifications and alterations to the described embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the teachings herein. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise numerous systems, arrangements and methods which, although not explicitly shown or described herein, embody the principles of the invention and are thus within the spirit and scope of the present invention. From the above description and drawings, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the particular embodiments shown and described are for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. References to details of particular embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4067000 | Carlson | Jan 1978 | A |
4231026 | Sullivan | Oct 1980 | A |
4578671 | Flowers | Mar 1986 | A |
4598243 | Kawakami | Jul 1986 | A |
5115236 | Koehler | May 1992 | A |
5164652 | Johnson | Nov 1992 | A |
5204657 | Prosser | Apr 1993 | A |
5294915 | Owen | Mar 1994 | A |
5408668 | Tornai | Apr 1995 | A |
5455560 | Owen | Oct 1995 | A |
5506572 | Hills | Apr 1996 | A |
5519760 | Borkowski | May 1996 | A |
5583491 | Kim | Dec 1996 | A |
5598143 | Wentz | Jan 1997 | A |
5638050 | Sacca | Jun 1997 | A |
5649018 | Gifford | Jul 1997 | A |
5684471 | Bernardi et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5705997 | Park | Jan 1998 | A |
5926090 | Taylor | Jul 1999 | A |
5945918 | McGonigal | Aug 1999 | A |
5963010 | Hayashi | Oct 1999 | A |
5990868 | Frederick | Nov 1999 | A |
5999799 | Hu | Dec 1999 | A |
6002450 | Darbee | Dec 1999 | A |
6191551 | Fischer | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6230277 | Nakaoka et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6295002 | Fukuda | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6373256 | Hanjani | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6407779 | Herz | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6449726 | Smith | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6535125 | Trivett | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6573832 | Fugere-Ramirez | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6633281 | Lin et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639454 | Hoshi | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6661410 | Casebolt et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664744 | Dietz | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6725064 | Wakamatsu | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6771182 | Loh et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6791467 | Ben-Ze'ev | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6938101 | Hayes | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6985069 | Marmaropoulos | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7009528 | Griep | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7047333 | Leung et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7199783 | Wenstrand | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7199789 | Endo et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7362227 | Kim | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7395717 | DeAngelis et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7411631 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7474248 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7511602 | Huntzicker | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7738792 | Flachs et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7757105 | Okazaki | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7852255 | Rapisarda | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7907060 | Reams | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8009054 | Reams | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8082455 | Reams | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20020085128 | Stefanik | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020093481 | Kehlstadt | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020126094 | Junod | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030026424 | McGarrahan | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035074 | Dubil | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030145242 | Derocher et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030159146 | Kim | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040095152 | Ho | May 2004 | A1 |
20040096051 | Kim et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040148632 | Park | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040161031 | Kwentus | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040203374 | Zilliacus | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040235446 | Flaherty et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040250273 | Swix | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252247 | Wabiszczewicz | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033887 | Kim et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050073497 | Kim | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050146438 | Giger | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050248534 | Kehlstadt | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060017581 | Scwendinger | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060034611 | Li | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060081771 | Eliad | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070018845 | Sutardja | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070054651 | Farmer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066394 | Ikeda et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070080823 | Fu | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070130609 | Han et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070185968 | White | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070279332 | Fryer et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080024435 | Dohta | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040758 | Beetcher et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080098426 | Candelore | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080163049 | Krampf | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080267435 | Schumaier | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080312852 | Maack | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002218 | Rigazio et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090007001 | Morin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090077396 | Tsai et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090122206 | Jun | May 2009 | A1 |
20090174653 | Shin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090241052 | Ha et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249086 | Reams | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262254 | Reams | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278701 | Reams | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090303097 | Reams | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090305742 | Caballero | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322583 | Reams | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100013551 | Reams | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110163886 | Reams | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110285540 | Reams | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2191632 | Aug 1997 | CA |
1 435 563 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1617315 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1 884 869 | Feb 2008 | EP |
2331610 | May 1999 | GB |
2347592 | Sep 2000 | GB |
2 398 138 | Aug 2004 | GB |
01114298 | May 1989 | JP |
04148499 | May 1992 | JP |
10334380 | Dec 1998 | JP |
00130848 | May 2000 | JP |
2001-268658 | Sep 2001 | JP |
04092946 | Mar 2004 | JP |
06020386 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2007-251893 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007-295186 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2007-318512 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008-028584 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008-042748 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2009-0047831 | May 2009 | KR |
WO 2007023437 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007086633 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2008146095 | Dec 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Jun. 24, 2009, PCT/US2009/037871, 4 pages. |
Osoinach, Bryce, “Proximity Capacitive Sensor Technology for Touch Sensing Applications,” Proximity Sensing White Paper prepared for Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Tempe, Arizona, 2007, 12 pages. |
European Office Action dated Jul. 4, 2011, EP 09726361.0, 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated Sep. 2, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,520, 8 pages. |
Amendment and Response to Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,370, 14 pages. |
Request for Continued Examination dated Sep. 7, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,370, 1 page. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 8, 2009, PCT/US2009/042651, 5 pages. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 27, 2009, PST/US2009/044302, 3 pages. |
International Search Report dated May 26, 2010, PCT/US2010/026694, 4 pages. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 2, 2009, PCT/US2009/039948, 5 pages. |
Preliminary Amendment dated Mar. 12, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,520, 7 pages. |
Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,520, 11 pages. |
Amendment and Response to Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,620, 8 pages. |
Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,620, 11 pages. |
Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/177,628, 20 pages. |
Amendment and Response to Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/177,628, 20 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated Jan. 6, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/177,628, 12 pages. |
Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,291, 18 pages. |
Amendment and Response to Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,291, 21 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,291, 18 pages. |
Amendment and Response to Final Office Action and Terminal Disclaimer dated Mar. 7, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,291 15 pages. |
Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/404,848, 11 pages. |
Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,370, 22 pages. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 20, 2009, PCT/US2009/037856, 2 pages. |
Japanese Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2011, JP 02011-501939, 3 pages. |
Korean Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2011, KR 10-2010-7023795, 1 page. |
Amendment and Response to Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,620, 8 pages. |
Terminal Disclaimer dated Mar. 23, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,520, 1 page. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,520, 10 pages. |
Advisory Action dated Jun. 29, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,520, 3 pages. |
Request for Continued Examination dated Jul. 15, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,520, 1 page. |
Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/175,897, 11 pages. |
Amendment and Response to Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/175,897, 13 pages. |
Amendment and Response to Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,370, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 9, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,370, 22 pages. |
Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,370, 29 pages. |
Amendment and Response to Office Action dated May 20, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/404,848, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated Dec. 15, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/404,848, 5 pages. |
Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 13/033,429, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 3, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,291, 8 pages. |
Office Action, for related Canadian Application No. 2,714,982, mailed Apr. 1, 2014, 6 pages. |
Reams, “Systems and Apparatus for Battery Replacement Detection and Reduced Battery Status Transmission in a Remote Control,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/033,429, Response to Non-Final Office Action with Terminal Disclaimer, filed Jan. 19, 2012, 4 pages. |
Reams, “Systems and Apparatus for Battery Replacement Detection and Reduced Battery Status Transmission in a Remote Control,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/033,429, Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 1, 2012, 14 pages. |
Reams, “Systems and Apparatus for Battery Replacement Detection and Reduced Battery Status Transmission in a Remote Control,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/033,429, Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 25, 2012, 10 pages. |
Reams, “Systems and Methods for Controlling Power Consumption in Electronic Devices,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/175,897, Final Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2012, 18 pages. |
Reams, “Systems and Methods for Controlling Power Consumption in Electronic Devices,” U.S. Application No. 12/175,897, Amendment in Response to Final Office Action, filed Mar. 30, 2012, 11 pages. |
Reams, “Systems and Methods for Controlling Power Consumption in Electronic Devices,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/175,897, Advisory Action, mailed Apr. 18, 2012, 4 pages. |
Reams, “Systems and Methods for Controlling Power Consumption in Electronic Devices,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/175,897, RCE with Amendment, filed Jun. 14, 2012, 15 pages. |
Reams, “Systems and Methods for Controlling Power Consumption in Electronic Devices,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/175,897, Notice of Allowance, mailed Jul. 6, 2012, 10 pages. |
Office Action in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,714,982, issued on May 5, 2015. |
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/033,429, filed Feb. 23, 2011. |
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/188,280, filed Jul. 21, 2011. |
Reams, William, U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,520, filed Mar. 27, 2008 entitled “Systems and Methods for Controlling the Power State of Remote Control Electronics”. |
Reams, William, et al, U.S. Appl. No. 12/135,370, filed Jun. 9, 2008 entitled “Systems, Methods and Apparatus for Changing an Operational Mode of a Remote Control”. |
Reams, William, et al, U.S. Appl. No. 12/175,897, filed Jul. 18, 2008 entitled “Systems and Methods for Controlling Power Consumption in Electronic Devices”. |
Reams, William, et al, U.S. Appl. No. 12/404,848, filed Mar. 16, 2009 entitled “Backlighting Remote Controls”. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090243909 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |