Various analytical procedures and devices are commonly employed in flow-through assays to determine the presence and/or concentration of analytes that may be present in a test sample. For instance, immunoassays utilize mechanisms of the immune systems, wherein antibodies are produced in response to the presence of antigens that are pathogenic or foreign to the organisms. These antibodies and antigens, i.e., immunoreactants, are capable of binding with one another, thereby causing a highly specific reaction mechanism that can be used to determine the presence or concentration of that particular antigen in a biological sample.
There are several well-known immunoassay methods that use immunoreactants labeled with a detectable component so that the analyte can be detected analytically. For example, “sandwich-type” assays typically involve mixing the test sample with detectable probes, such as dyed latex or a radioisotope, which are conjugated with a specific binding member for the analyte. The conjugated probes form complexes with the analyte. These complexes then reach a zone of immobilized antibodies where binding occurs between the antibodies and the analyte to form ternary “sandwich complexes.” The sandwich complexes are localized at the zone for detection of the analyte. This technique can be used to obtain quantitative or semi-quantitative results. Some examples of such sandwich-type assays are described in by U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,168,146 to Grubb, et al. and 4,366,241 to Tom, et al.
However, many conventional “sandwich-type” assay formats encounter significant inaccuracies when exposed to relatively high analyte concentrations. Specifically, when the analyte is present at high concentrations, a substantial portion of the analyte in the test sample may not form complexes with the conjugated probes. Thus, upon reaching the detection zone, the uncomplexed analyte competes with the complexed analyte for binding sites. Because the uncomplexed analyte is not labeled with a probe, it cannot be detected. Consequently, if a significant number of the binding sites become occupied by the uncomplexed analyte, the assay may exhibit a “false negative.” This problem is commonly referred to as the “hook effect.”
Various techniques for reducing the “hook effect” in immunoassays have been proposed. For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 6,184,042 to Neumann, et al. describes one technique for reducing the hook effect in a sandwich assay. The technique involves incubating the sample in the presence of a solid phase with at least two receptors capable of binding to the analyte. The first receptor is an oligomer of a binding molecule selected from antibodies, antibody fragments and mixtures thereof. The second receptor is bound to or capable of being bound to a solid phase. The use of a soluble oligomeric antibody is said to reduce the “hook effect.”
A need still exists, however, for an improved technique of reducing the “hook effect” in a simple, efficient, and relatively inexpensive manner.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a flow-through assay device for detecting the presence or quantity of an analyte residing in a test sample is disclosed. The flow-through assay device comprises a porous membrane that is in communication with conjugated detection probes capable of generating a detection signal. The porous membrane defines a chromatographic zone within which a plurality of microporous particles are immobilized. The microporous particles can define a plurality of spaces therebetween, the spaces having an average size that is greater than the average size of the micropores. In some embodiments, the average size of the micropores is at least about 100%, in some embodiments at least about 150%, and in some embodiments, at least about 250% less than the average sizes of the spaces. The microporous particles may be selected from the group consisting of polystyrenes, polyacrylamides, polyacrylonitriles; silica beads, and combinations thereof, and the surface thereof may be chemically inert to the analyte.
The porous membrane further defines a detection zone located downstream from the chromatographic zone. A capture reagent is immobilized within the detection zone that is configured to bind to the conjugated detection probes. The conjugated detection probes are capable of generating a detection signal while within the detection zone, wherein the amount of the analyte within the test sample is determined from said detection signal.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a flow-through, sandwich assay device for detecting the presence or quantity of an analyte residing in a test sample is disclosed. The assay device comprises a porous membrane that is in communication with conjugated detection probes capable of generating a detection signal. The conjugated detection probes are configured to combine with the analyte in the test sample when contacted therewith such that analyte/probe complexes and uncomplexed analyte are formed. The porous membrane defines a chromatographic zone within which a plurality of microporous particles are immobilized. The microporous particles are configured so that the uncomplexed analyte flows through the chromatographic zone at a slower rate than the analyte/probe complexes. The porous membrane further comprises a detection zone located downstream from the chromatographic zone. A capture reagent is immobilized within the detection zone that is configured to bind to the analyte/probe complexes so that the complexes generate a detection signal while within the detection zone, wherein the amount of the analyte within the test sample is determined from the detection signal.
A method for detecting the presence or quantity of an analyte residing in a test sample is disclosed. The method comprises:
i) providing a flow-through assay device comprising a porous membrane, the porous membrane being in communication with conjugated detection probes capable of generating a detection signal, the porous membrane defining a chromatographic zone within which a plurality of microporous particles are immobilized and a detection zone located downstream from the chromatographic zone, wherein a capture reagent is immobilized within the detection zone;
ii) contacting a test sample containing the analyte with the conjugated detection probes so that analyte/probe complexes and uncomplexed analyte are formed; and
iii) allowing the analyte/probe complexes and the uncomplexed analyte to reach the chromatographic zone and then the detection zone, wherein the analyte/probe complexes reach the detection zone before the uncomplexed analyte.
Other features and aspects of the present invention are discussed in greater detail below.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth more particularly in the remainder of the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures in which:
Repeat use of reference characters in the present specification and drawings is intended to represent same or analogous features or elements of the invention.
As used herein, the term “analyte” generally refers to a substance to be detected. For instance, analytes can include antigenic substances, haptens, antibodies, and combinations thereof. Analytes include, but are not limited to, toxins, organic compounds, proteins, peptides, microorganisms, amino acids, nucleic acids, hormones, steroids, vitamins, drugs (including those administered for therapeutic purposes as well as those administered for illicit purposes), drug intermediaries or byproducts, bacteria, virus particles and metabolites of or antibodies to any of the above substances. Specific examples of some analytes include ferritin; creatinine kinase MIB (CK-MB); digoxin; phenytoin; phenobarbitol; carbamazepine; vancomycin; gentamycin; theophylline; valproic acid; quinidine; leutinizing hormone (LH); follicle stimulating hormone (FSH); estradiol, progesterone; C-reactive protein; lipocalins; IgE antibodies; vitamin B2 micro-globulin; glycated hemoglobin (Gly. Hb); cortisol; digitoxin; N-acetylprocainamide 4 (NAPA); procainamide; antibodies to rubella, such as rubella-IgG and rubella IgM; antibodies to toxoplasmosis, such as toxoplasmosis IgG (Toxo-IgG) and toxoplasmosis IgM (Toxo-IgM); testosterone; salicylates; acetaminophen; hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg); antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen, such as anti-hepatitis B core antigen IgG and IgM (Anti-HBC); human immune deficiency virus 1 and 2 (HIV 1 and 2); human T-cell leukemia virus 1 and 2 (HTLV); hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg); antibodies to hepatitis B e antigen (Anti-HBe); thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH); thyroxine (T4); total triiodothyronine (Total T3); free triiodothyronine (Free T3); carcinoembryoic antigen (CEA); and alpha fetal protein (AFP). Drugs of abuse and controlled substances include, but are not intended to be limited to, amphetamine; methamphetamine; barbiturates, such as amobarbital, secobarbital, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, and barbital; benzodiazepines, such as librium and valium; cannabinoids, such as hashish and marijuana; cocaine; fentanyl; LSD; methaqualone; opiates, such as heroin, morphine, codeine, hydromorphone, hydrocodone, methadone, oxycodone, oxymorphone and opium; phencyclidine; and propoxyhene. Other potential analytes may be described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,436,651 to Everhart, et al. and 4,366,241 to Tom et al.
As used herein, the term “test sample” generally refers to a material suspected of containing the analyte. The test sample can be used directly as obtained from the source or following a pretreatment to modify the character of the sample. The test sample can be derived from any biological source, such as a physiological fluid, including, blood, interstitial fluid, saliva, ocular lens fluid, cerebral spinal fluid, sweat, urine, milk, ascites fluid, raucous, synovial fluid, peritoneal fluid, vaginal fluid, amniotic fluid or the like. The test sample can be pretreated prior to use, such as preparing plasma from blood, diluting viscous fluids, and the like. Methods of treatment can involve filtration, precipitation, dilution, distillation, concentration, inactivation of interfering components, and the addition of reagents. Besides physiological fluids, other liquid samples can be used such as water, food products and the like for the performance of environmental or food production assays. In addition, a solid material suspected of containing the analyte can be used as the test sample. In some instances it may be beneficial to modify a solid test sample to form a liquid medium or to release the analyte.
Reference now will be made in detail to various embodiments of the invention, one or more examples of which are set forth below. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment, can be used on another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
In general, the present invention is directed to a membrane-based assay device for detecting the presence or quantity of an analyte residing in a test sample. The device utilizes a chromatographic zone on which is disposed a plurality of microporous particles. The chromatographic zone can effectively reduce the “hook effect” in a simple, efficient, and relatively inexpensive manner. In particular, the plurality of microporous particles allows larger-sized analyte/probe complexes to reach the detection zone before the uncomplexed analyte. Because the uncomplexed analyte is substantially inhibited from competing with the complexes for the binding sites at the detection zone, the incidence of “false negatives” may be limited, even at relatively high analyte concentrations.
Referring to
The device 20 may also contain a wicking pad 28. The wicking pad 28 generally receives fluid that has migrated through the entire porous membrane 23. As is well known in the art, the wicking pad 28 can assist in promoting capillary action and fluid flow through the membrane 23.
To initiate the detection of an analyte within the test sample, a user may directly apply the test sample to a portion of the porous membrane 23 through which it can then travel. Alternatively, the test sample may first be applied to a sampling pad (not shown) that is in fluid communication with the porous membrane 23. Some suitable materials that can be used to form the sampling pad include, but are not limited to, nitrocellulose, cellulose, porous polyethylene pads, and glass fiber filter paper. If desired, the sampling pad may also contain one or more assay pretreatment reagents, either diffusively or non-diffusively attached thereto.
In the illustrated embodiment, the test sample travels from the sampling pad (not shown) to a conjugate pad 22 that is placed in communication with one end of the sampling pad. The conjugate pad 22 is formed from a material through which the test sample is capable of passing. For example, in one embodiment, the conjugate pad 22 is formed from glass fibers. Although only one conjugate pad 22 is shown, it should be understood that other conjugate pads may also be used in the present invention.
To facilitate accurate detection of the presence or absence of an analyte within the test sample, probes are applied at various locations of the device 20. As described in more detail below, probes may be used for both detection of the analyte and for calibration. Any substance generally capable of generating a signal that is detectable visually or by an instrumental device may be used as probes. Various suitable substances can include chromogens; catalysts; fluorescent compounds; chemiluminescent compounds; phosphorescent compounds; radioactive compounds; direct visual labels, including colloidal metallic (e.g., gold) and non-metallic particles, dye particles, enzymes or substrates, or organic polymer latex particles; liposomes or other vesicles containing signal producing substances; and the like. For instance, some enzymes suitable for use as probes are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,275,149 to Litman, et al., which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference thereto for all purposes. One example of an enzyme/substrate system is the enzyme alkaline phosphatase and the substrate nitro blue tetrazolium-5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate, or derivative or analog thereof, or the substrate 4-methylumbelliferylphosphate. Other suitable probes may be described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,670,381 to Jou, et al. and 5,252,459 to Tarcha, et al., which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference thereto for all purposes.
In some embodiments, the probes can contain a fluorescent compound that produces a detectable signal. The fluorescent compounds can be fluorescent molecules, polymers, dendrimers, particles, and the like. Some examples of suitable fluorescent molecules, for instance, include, but are not limited to, fluorescein, europium chelates, phycobiliprotein, rhodamine and their derivatives and analogs. A visually detectable, colored compound can also be used as a probe, thereby providing for a direct colored readout of the presence or concentration of the analyte in the sample without the need for further signal producing reagents.
The probes, such as described above, may be used alone or in conjunction with a microparticle (sometimes referred to as “beads” or “microbeads”). For instance, naturally occurring microparticles, such as nuclei, mycoplasma, plasmids, plastids, mammalian cells (e.g., erythrocyte ghosts), unicellular microorganisms (e.g., bacteria), polysaccharides (e.g., agarose), and the like, can be used. Further, synthetic microparticles may also be utilized. For example, in one embodiment, latex microparticles that are labeled with a fluorescent or colored dye are utilized. Although any latex microparticle may be used in the present invention, the latex microparticles are typically formed from polystyrene, butadiene styrenes, styreneacrylic-vinyl terpolymer, polymethylmethacrylate, polyethylmethacrylate, styrene-maleic anhydride copolymer, polyvinyl acetate, polyvinylpyridine, polydivinylbenzene, polybutyleneterephthalate, acrylonitrile, vinylchloride-acrylates, and the like, or an aldehyde, carboxyl, amino, hydroxyl, or hydrazide derivative thereof. Other suitable microparticles may be described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,670,381 to Jou, et al. and 5,252,459 to Tarcha, et al., which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference thereto for all purposes. Some commercially available examples of suitable fluorescent particles include fluorescent carboxylated microspheres sold by Molecular Probes, Inc. under the trade names “FluoSphere” (Red 580/605) and “TransfluoSphere” (543/620), as well as “Texas Red” and 5- and 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine, which are also sold by Molecular Probes, Inc. Commercially available examples of suitable colored, latex microparticles include carboxylated latex beads sold by Bang's Laboratory, Inc.
In some instances, it is desired to modify the probes in some manner so that they are more readily able to bond to the analyte. In such instances, the probes can be modified with certain specific binding members that are adhered thereto to form conjugated probes. Specific binding members generally refer to a member of a specific binding pair, i.e., two different molecules where one of the molecules chemically and/or physically binds to the second molecule. For instance, immunoreactive specific binding members can include antigens, haptens, aptamers, antibodies, and complexes thereof, including those formed by recombinant DNA methods or peptide synthesis. An antibody can be a monoclonal or polyclonal antibody, a recombinant protein or a mixture(s) or fragment(s) thereof, as well as a mixture of an antibody and other specific binding members. The details of the preparation of such antibodies and their suitability for use as specific binding members are well known to those skilled in the art. Other common specific binding pairs include but are not limited to, biotin and avidin, carbohydrates and lectins, complementary nucleotide sequences (including probe and capture nucleic acid sequences used in DNA hybridization assays to detect a target nucleic acid sequence), complementary peptide sequences including those formed by recombinant methods, effector and receptor molecules, hormone and hormone binding protein, enzyme cofactors and enzymes, enzyme inhibitors and enzymes, and the like. Furthermore, specific binding pairs can include members that are analogs of the original specific binding member. For example, a derivative or fragment of the analyte, i.e., an analyte-analog, can be used so long as it has at least one epitope in common with the analyte.
The specific binding members can generally be attached to the probes using any of a variety of well-known techniques. For instance, covalent attachment of the specific binding members to the probes (e.g., microparticles) can be accomplished using carboxylic, amino, aldehyde, bromoacetyl, iodoacetyl, thiol, epoxy and other reactive or linking functional groups, as well as residual free radicals and radical cations, through which a protein coupling reaction can be accomplished. A surface functional group can also be incorporated as a functionalized co-monomer because the surface of the microparticle can contain a relatively high surface concentration of polar groups. In addition, although microparticle probes are often functionalized after synthesis, in certain cases, such as poly(thiophenol), the microparticles are capable of direct covalent linking with a protein without the need for further modification. For example, referring to
As indicated above, some of the analyte in the test sample may not become complexed to the conjugated probes in the desired manner, particularly when the analyte is present in the test sample at high concentrations. This uncomplexed analyte can later compete with the complexed analyte for the capture reagent at the detection zone 31 (described below), thereby adversely affecting the accuracy of the assay device 20. To counteract this affect, the porous membrane 23 contains a chromatographic zone 35 on which a plurality of microporous particles 50 are distributed. As shown in
The chromatographic zone 35 generally provides a single distinct region (e.g., line, dot, etc.), although multiple regions are certainly contemplated by the present invention. For instance, in the illustrated embodiment, a single line is utilized. When utilized, the width of the line may generally vary. For example, in some embodiments, the width of the line in the direction L of analyte flow is from about 10% to about 100%, and in some embodiments, from about 10% to about 50% of the total distance measured from the location at which the analyte is applied (e.g., the conjugate pad 22) to the detection zone 31. Further, the line may be disposed in a direction that is substantially perpendicular to the flow of the test sample through the device 20. Likewise, in some embodiments, the line may be disposed in a direction that is substantially parallel to the flow of the test sample through the device 20.
The criteria for selecting appropriate microporous particles 50 for use in a given assay can include a variety of factors, such as the nature of the analyte of interest, the conditions of testing, the nature of the probes utilized, etc. Typically, it is desired that the microporous particles 50 have a relative uniform pore and particle size distribution and good mechanical and chemical stability. In addition, it is also typically desired that the surface of the microporous particles 50 remains chemically inert to other components of the assay device 20. For instance, the surface of the microporous particles 50 is generally chemically inert with respect to the analyte. Some examples of microporous particles 50 that may be used in the present invention include, but are not limited to, synthetic polymeric particles, such as polystyrenes (e.g., highly crosslinked polystyrene), polyacrylamides, polyacrylonitriles; silica beads, etc. Specific examples of some suitable synthetic microporous particles 50 are described, for instance, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,110,529 to Stoy; 4,940,734 to Ley, et al.; and 5,314,923 to Cooke, et al., which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference thereto for all purposes. In embodiments in which the probes are also microporous particles, it should be understood that the microporous particles 50 of the chromatographic zone 35 may be the same as the probes.
The average diameter of the microporous particles 50 may generally vary as desired. For example, in some embodiments, the average diameter of the particles 50 can range from about 0.1 to about 1,000 microns, in some embodiments from about 0.1 to about 100 microns, and in some embodiments, from about 1 to about 10 microns. Typically, the particles 50 are substantially spherical in shape (i.e., beads), although other shapes including, but not limited to, plates, rods, bars, irregular shapes, etc., are suitable for use in the present invention. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the composition, shape, size, and/or density of the particles 50 may widely vary.
Generally speaking, the micropores 51 of the particles 50 have an average size (i.e., diameter) that is smaller than the spaces between the particles 50 formed by the pores 52 of the porous membrane 23. Specifically, the average size of the micropores 51 is typically at least about 100%, in some embodiments, at least about 150%, and in some embodiments, at least about 250% smaller than the average size of the spaces therebetween. In some embodiments, for instance, the micropores 51 have an average size less than about 100 nanometers, in some embodiments from about 5 to about 100 nanometers, and in some embodiments, from about 10 to about 60 nanometers. As a comparison, the pores 52 of the porous membrane 23 typically have an average size of greater than about 200 nanometers, in some embodiments from about 200 to about 5000 nanometers, and in some embodiments, from about 200 to about 2500 nanometers.
The assay device 20 may also contain a detection zone 31, on which is immobilized a capture reagent that is capable of binding to the conjugated probes. For example, in some embodiments, the capture reagent may be a biological capture reagent. Such biological capture reagents are well known in the art and can include, but are not limited to, antigens, haptens, antibodies, protein A or G, avidin, streptavidin, secondary antibodies, and complexes thereof. In many cases, it is desired that these biological capture reagents are capable of binding to a specific binding member (e.g., antibody) present on the probes. In addition, it may also be desired to utilize various non-biological materials for the capture reagent. For instance, in some embodiments, the capture reagent can include a polyelectrolyte. The polyelectrolytes can have a net positive or negative charge, as well as a net charge that is generally neutral. For instance, some suitable examples of polyelectrolytes having a net positive charge include, but are not limited to, polylysine (commercially available from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., Inc. of St. Louis, Mo.), polyethylenimine; epichlorohydrin-functionalized polyamines and/or polyamidoamines, such as poly(dimethylamine-co-epichlorohydrin); polydialiyldimethyl-ammonium chloride; cationic cellulose derivatives, such as cellulose copolymers or cellulose derivatives grafted with a quaternary ammonium water-soluble monomer; and the like. In one particular embodiment, CelQuat® SC-230M or H-100 (available from National Starch & Chemical, Inc.), which are cellulosic derivatives containing a quaternary ammonium water-soluble monomer, can be utilized. Moreover, some suitable examples of polyelectrolytes having a net negative charge include, but are not limited to, polyacrylic acids, such as poly(ethylene-co-methacrylic acid, sodium salt), and the like. It should also be understood that other polyelectrolytes may also be utilized, such as amphiphilic polyelectrolytes (i.e., having polar and non-polar portions). For instance, some examples of suitable amphiphilic polyelectrolytes include, but are not limited to, poly(styryl-b-N-methyl 2-vinyl pyridinium iodide) and poly(styryl-b-acrylic acid), both of which are available from Polymer Source, Inc. of Dorval, Canada.
The capture reagent serves as a stationary binding site for the analyte/probe complexes. Specifically, analytes, such as antibodies, antigens, etc., typically have two binding sites. Upon reaching the detection zone 31, one of these binding sites is occupied by the specific binding member of the conjugated probe. However, the free binding site of the analyte can bind to the immobilized capture reagent. Upon being bound to the immobilized capture reagent, the complexed probes form a new ternary sandwich complex.
The detection zone 31 may generally provide any number of distinct detection regions so that a user can better determine the concentration of a particular analyte within a test sample. Each region may contain the same capture reagents, or may contain different capture reagents for capturing multiple analytes. For example, the detection zone 31 may include two or more distinct detection regions (e.g., lines, dots, etc.). The detection regions may be disposed in the form of lines in a direction that is substantially perpendicular to the flow of the test sample through the assay device 20. Likewise, in some embodiments, the detection regions can be disposed in the form of lines in a direction that is substantially parallel to the flow of the test sample through the assay device.
Although the detection zone 31 may indicate the presence of an analyte, it is often difficult to determine the relative concentration of the analyte within the test sample using solely a detection zone 31. Thus, the assay device 20 may also include a calibration zone 32. In this embodiment, the calibration zone 32 is formed on the porous membrane 23 and is positioned downstream from the detection zone 31. The calibration zone 32 is provided with a capture reagent that is capable of binding to any remaining uncaptured probes that pass through the length of the membrane 23. The capture reagent utilized in the calibration zone 32 may be the same or different than the capture reagent used in the detection zone 31. Moreover, similar to the detection zone 31, the calibration zone 32 may also provide any number of distinct calibration regions in any direction so that a user can better determine the concentration of a particular analyte within a test sample. Each region may contain the same capture reagents, or may contain different capture reagents for capturing different probes.
The calibration regions may be pre-loaded on the porous membrane 23 with different amounts of the capture reagent so that a different signal intensity is generated by each calibration region upon migration of the probes. The overall amount of binder within each calibration region can be varied by utilizing calibration regions of different sizes and/or by varying the concentration or volume of the capture reagent in each calibration region. If desired, an excess of probes can be employed in the assay device 20 so that each calibration region reaches its full and predetermined potential for signal intensity. That is, the amount of probes that are deposited upon calibration regions are predetermined because the amount of the capture reagent employed on the calibration regions is set at a predetermined and known level.
In general, a variety of flow-through assay devices may be constructed according to the present invention. In this regard, various embodiments of the present invention will now be described in more detail. It should be understood, however, that the embodiments discussed below are only exemplary, and that other embodiments are also contemplated by the present invention. For instance, referring to
As shown in
Although various embodiments of device configurations have been described above, it should be understood, that a device of the present invention may generally have any configuration desired, and need not contain all of the components described above. Various other device configurations and/or assay formats, for instance, are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,395,754 to Lambotte, et al.; 5,670,381 to Jou, et al.; and 6,194,220 to Malick, et al., which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference thereto for all purposes.
The present inventors have discovered that the presence of a chromatographic zone on the porous membrane of an assay device can effectively reduce the “hook effect” in a simple, efficient, and relatively inexpensive manner. In particular, a plurality of microporous particles can be disposed on the chromatographic zone to allow larger-sized analyte/probes complexes to reach the detection before any uncomplexed analyte. Accordingly, the uncomplexed analyte does not compete with the complexes for available binding sites at the detection zone. Because the uncomplexed analyte is inhibited from occupying a substantial number of the binding sites at the detection zone, the incidence of “false negatives” may be limited, even at relatively high analyte concentrations.
While the invention has been described in detail with respect to the specific embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art, upon attaining an understanding of the foregoing, may readily conceive of alterations to, variations of, and equivalents to these embodiments. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention should be assessed as that of the appended claims and any equivalents thereto.
The present application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/325,614, filed on Dec. 19, 2002, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference thereto.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 164659 | Reckhow et al. | May 1875 | A |
| 1366241 | Burch | Jan 1921 | A |
| 3700623 | Keim | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3772076 | Keim | Nov 1973 | A |
| 4094647 | Deutsch et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4110529 | Stoy | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4115535 | Giaever | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4168146 | Grubb et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| RE30267 | Bruschi | May 1980 | E |
| 4210723 | Dorman et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4235601 | Deutsch et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4275149 | Litman et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4312228 | Wohltjen | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4361537 | Deutsch et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4363874 | Greenquist | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4366241 | Tom et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4374925 | Litman et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4385126 | Chen et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4426451 | Columbus | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4427836 | Kowalski et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4435504 | Zuk et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4441373 | White | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4442204 | Greenquist et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4444592 | Ludwig | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4477635 | Mitra | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4480042 | Craig et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4533499 | Clark et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4533629 | Litman et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4534356 | Papadakis | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4537657 | Keim | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4537861 | Elings et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4540659 | Litman et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4552458 | Lowne | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4561286 | Sekler et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4562157 | Lowe et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4586695 | Miller | May 1986 | A |
| 4595661 | Cragle et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4596697 | Ballato | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4614723 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4632559 | Brunsting | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4661235 | Krull et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4698262 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4703017 | Campbell et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4714682 | Schwartz | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4722889 | Lee et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4727019 | Valkirs et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4731337 | Luotola et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4743542 | Graham, Jr. et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4776944 | Janata et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4837168 | de Jaeger et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4842783 | Blaylock | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4843000 | Litman et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4843021 | Noguchi et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4844613 | Batchelder et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4849338 | Litman et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4855240 | Rosenstein et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4857453 | Ullman et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4867908 | Recktenwald et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4868126 | Schwartz | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4877586 | Devaney, Jr. et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4877747 | Stewart | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4895017 | Pyke et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4916056 | Brown, III et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4917503 | Bhattacharjee | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4940734 | Ley et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4963498 | Hillman et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4973670 | McDonald et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4992385 | Godfrey | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5003178 | Livesay | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5023053 | Finlan | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5026653 | Lee et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5035863 | Finlan et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5055265 | Finlan | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5063081 | Cozzette et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5064619 | Finlan | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5075077 | Durley, III et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5076094 | Frye et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5096671 | Kane et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5100238 | Nailor et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5114676 | Leiner et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5120662 | Chan et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5124254 | Hewlins et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5134057 | Kuypers et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5137609 | Manian et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5143854 | Pirrung et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5145784 | Cox et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5152758 | Kaetsu et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5156953 | Litman et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5182135 | Giesecke et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5196350 | Backman et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5200084 | Liberti et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5208535 | Nakayama et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5221454 | Manian et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5225935 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5234813 | McGeehan et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5235238 | Nomura et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5238815 | Higo et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5242828 | Bergström et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5252459 | Tarcha et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5262299 | Evangelista et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5268306 | Berger et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5314923 | Cooke et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5316727 | Suzuki et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5320944 | Okada et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5321492 | Detwiler et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5327225 | Bender et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5330898 | Bar-Or et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5342759 | Litman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5352582 | Lichtenwalter et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5356782 | Moorman et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5358852 | Wu | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5369717 | Attridge | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5374531 | Jensen | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5374563 | Maule | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5376255 | Gumbrecht et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5387503 | Selmer et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5395754 | Lambotte et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5415842 | Maule | May 1995 | A |
| 5418136 | Miller et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5424219 | Jirikowski | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5432057 | Litman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5436161 | Bergström et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5445971 | Rohr | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5451683 | Barrett et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5455475 | Josse et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5464741 | Hendrix | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5466574 | Liberti et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5467778 | Catt et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5468606 | Bogart et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5482830 | Bogart et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5482867 | Barrett et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5484867 | Lichtenham et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5489678 | Fodor et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5489988 | Ackley et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5492840 | Malmqvist et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5500350 | Baker et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5504013 | Senior | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5508171 | Walling et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5510481 | Bednarski et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5512131 | Kumar et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5514559 | Markert-Hahn et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5514785 | Van Ness et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5516635 | Ekins et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5518689 | Dosmann et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5518883 | Soini | May 1996 | A |
| 5527711 | Tom-Moy et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5534132 | Vreeke et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5554541 | Malmqvist et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559041 | Kang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5569608 | Sommer | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571684 | Lawrence et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5573909 | Singer et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5585279 | Davidson | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5589401 | Hansen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5591581 | Massey et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596414 | Tyler | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5599668 | Stimpson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5618888 | Choi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5620850 | Bamdad et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5637509 | Hemmilä et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5647994 | Tuunanen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5658443 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5663213 | Jones et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5670381 | Jou et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5672256 | Yee | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5700636 | Sheiness et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5726064 | Robinson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5731147 | Bard et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5736188 | Alcock et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5753517 | Brooks et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5770416 | Lihme et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5780308 | Ching et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5795470 | Wang et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5795543 | Poto et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5811526 | Davidson | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5827748 | Golden | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5834226 | Maupin | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837429 | Nohr et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837546 | Allen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837547 | Schwartz | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5843692 | Phillips et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5852229 | Josse et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5876944 | Kuo | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5885527 | Buechler | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5906921 | Ikeda et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5910447 | Lawrence et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5910940 | Guerra | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5922537 | Ewart et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5922550 | Everhart et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5951492 | Douglas et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5962995 | Avnery | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6004530 | Sagner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6020047 | Everhart | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6027904 | Devine et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6027944 | Robinson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030792 | Otterness et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030840 | Mullinax et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6033574 | Siddiqi | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6048623 | Everhart et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6060256 | Everhart et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6080391 | Tsuchiya et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6084683 | Bruno et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6087184 | Magginetti et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6099484 | Douglas et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6103537 | Ullman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6117090 | Caillouette | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6136549 | Feistel | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6136611 | Saaski et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139961 | Blankenship et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6151110 | Markart | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6165798 | Brooks | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6171780 | Pham et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171870 | Freitag | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174646 | Hirai et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6177281 | Manita | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6180288 | Everhart et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183972 | Kuo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6184042 | Neumann et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6194220 | Malick et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6200820 | Hansen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6221238 | Grundig et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221579 | Everhart et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6234974 | Catt et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235241 | Catt et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235471 | Knapp et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235491 | Connolly | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241863 | Monbouquette | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6242268 | Wieder et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6255066 | Louderback | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6261779 | Barbera-Guillem et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6268222 | Chandler et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270637 | Crismore et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6271040 | Buechler | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6281006 | Heller et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6284472 | Wei et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6287783 | Maynard et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6287871 | Herron et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6294392 | Kuhr et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6306665 | Buck et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| D450854 | Lipman et al. | Nov 2001 | S |
| 6331438 | Aylott et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6348186 | Sutton et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6362011 | Massey et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6368873 | Chang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6368875 | Geisberg | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6387707 | Seul et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6391558 | Henkens et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6399295 | Kaylor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6399397 | Zarling et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6403384 | Lea | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6407492 | Avnery et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6411439 | Nishikawa | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6413410 | Hodges et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6436651 | Everhart et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6436722 | Clark et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6444423 | Meade et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6448091 | Massey et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6451607 | Lawrence et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6455861 | Hoyt | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6461496 | Feldman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6468741 | Massey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6472226 | Barradine et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6479146 | Caruso et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6509085 | Kennedy | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6509196 | Brooks et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6511814 | Carpenter | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6556299 | Rushbrooke et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6566508 | Bentsen et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6573040 | Everhart et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6579673 | McGrath et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6582930 | Ponomarev et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6585939 | Dapprich | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6613583 | Richter et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6617488 | Springer et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6670115 | Zhang | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6696304 | Davies | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6720007 | Walt et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6787368 | Wong et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6815218 | Jacobson et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 7247500 | Wei et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 20010055776 | Greenwalt | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020070128 | Beckmann | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020146754 | Kitawaki et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020164659 | Rao et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030017615 | Sidwell et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119202 | Kaylor et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119204 | Wei et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030124739 | Song et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030178309 | Huang et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040014073 | Trau et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040043502 | Song et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040043507 | Song et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040043511 | Song et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040043512 | Song et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040106190 | Yang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121334 | Wei et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040197819 | Yang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050112703 | Song | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050112779 | Wei et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050112780 | Song | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050136500 | Yang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050136529 | Yang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050136550 | Yang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050191704 | Boga et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244953 | Cohen | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0073593 | Mar 1983 | EP |
| 0205698 | Dec 1986 | EP |
| 0420053 | Apr 1991 | EP |
| 0437287 | Jul 1991 | EP |
| 0462376 | Dec 1991 | EP |
| 0469377 | Feb 1992 | EP |
| 0539035 | Apr 1993 | EP |
| 0539035 | Apr 1993 | EP |
| 0617285 | Sep 1994 | EP |
| 0617285 | Sep 1994 | EP |
| 0657737 | Jun 1995 | EP |
| 0657737 | Jun 1995 | EP |
| 0660114 | Jun 1995 | EP |
| 0703454 | Mar 1996 | EP |
| 0711414 | May 1996 | EP |
| 0724156 | Jul 1996 | EP |
| 0745843 | Dec 1996 | EP |
| 0745843 | Dec 1996 | EP |
| 0833159 | Apr 1998 | EP |
| 0859230 | Aug 1998 | EP |
| 0898169 | Feb 1999 | EP |
| 1221616 | Jul 2002 | EP |
| 2273772 | Jun 1994 | GB |
| WO 8804777 | Jun 1988 | WO |
| WO 9005305 | May 1990 | WO |
| WO 9105999 | May 1991 | WO |
| WO 9221769 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| WO 9221770 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| WO 9221975 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| WO 9301308 | Jan 1993 | WO |
| WO 9319370 | Sep 1993 | WO |
| WO 9406012 | Mar 1994 | WO |
| WO 9413835 | Jun 1994 | WO |
| WO 9415193 | Jul 1994 | WO |
| WO 9626435 | Aug 1996 | WO |
| WO 9703347 | Jan 1997 | WO |
| WO 9709620 | Mar 1997 | WO |
| WO 9737222 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO 9810334 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| WO 9815831 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 9827417 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 9843086 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO 9910742 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO 9930131 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO 9936777 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO 9964864 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO 0019199 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO 0023805 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO 0034781 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO 0036416 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO 0046839 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO 0046839 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO 0047983 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO 0050891 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO 0078917 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 0129559 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO 0138873 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO 0150129 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0150129 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0163299 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 0171344 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO 0198765 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 0198785 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 02077646 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO 03005013 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 03058246 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080014659 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10325614 | Dec 2002 | US |
| Child | 11780671 | US |