This invention relates to microelectronics and semiconductor circuitry. More specifically, the invention relates to charge pump voltage multipliers. Even more specifically, the invention relates to the reduction of negative effects of overstressing cells through uneven voltage distribution in ladders of voltage multiplier cells.
Cross-coupled MOS inverter cells, driven by capacitively-coupled complementary clock signals are efficient building blocks in charge-pumps. These cells may be used to elevate an input DC voltage to a higher voltage output level. The cells may also be used to reduce an input DC voltage to a lower voltage output level. A positive input DC voltage may optionally be reduced to an output level below zero volts.
Known applications of these cells are proposed in P. Favrat, P. Deval, M. J. Declercq, “A High-Efficiency CMOS Voltage Doubler,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 33, No. 3, March 1998, and R. Pelliconi et al., “Power Efficient Charge Pump in Deep Submicron Standard CMOS Technology,” Proc. 27 ESSCIRC, 2001. As illustrated in
As illustrated in
A dual-bucket cell, for example of the type illustrated in
A clock input signal CLK_IN is preferably provided to amplifiers 201, 202. Amplifier 201 outputs amplified clock signal clk to each of cells 205, 207, 210, and any intermediate nodes ( . . . ) via capacitors 203. Amplifier 202 outputs inverted clock signal nclk to each of cells 205, 207, 210, and any intermediate nodes ( . . . ) via capacitors 204. Capacitors 203 and 204 are not illustrated herein for intermediate nodes ( . . . ), but, if used, will be connected in the same fashion as those illustrated with respect to cells 205, 207, 210. That is, capacitor 203 for any intermediate nodes ( . . . ) will be connected between signal clk and the node. And capacitor 204 for any intermediate nodes ( . . . ) will be connected between signal nclk and the node.
Node 211 provides output voltage V_HIGH_OUT from cell 210. Node 211 is preferably coupled to ground via capacitor 213.
Cascaded cells of the type illustrated in
Assuming that the transistors illustrated in
However, in a cascading structure (also known as a “ladder” structure) of the type illustrated in
Mean voltage difference=(V_HIGH_OUT−V_LOW_IN)/number of cells (Equation 1)
Subjecting any of the cells to a voltage difference that is significantly higher than the mean voltage difference may result in degradation or destruction of the cell by oxide breakdown or accelerated aging. Such degradation or destruction is undesirable in industrial products and many other products, which are expected to function over extended periods of time and over extended usage.
In a first problematic situation, unequal voltage distribution can be seen when a device's clock is paused (for example, to reduce power consumption) at the same time that the output voltage V_HIGH_OUT is maintained at a high level due to its decoupling capacitor. In this type of situation, unequal leakage currents on the different nodes of the ladder structure can be expected due to the seemingly random nature of micro-imperfections in the device. Unequal leakage currents can cause differing voltage drifts in the various intermediate nodes of the ladder structure. It is an object of this invention to reduce or eliminate this problem.
In a second problematic situation, unequal voltage distribution can also be seen when a device's clock is active and the clock's amplitude is marginally small or inadequate with respect to the voltage of an individual cell. This situation may, for example, arise after the clock is paused as described in the previous paragraph. Alternatively, the situation may, for example, arise after the output load current or output voltage is varied in a relatively fast manner. In such a circumstance, the cross-coupled inverters in at least one of the cells may not be able to switch states. As a consequence of this inability to switch states, the complementary clock pulses can be transmitted through the capacitors and create square waveforms on the intermediate nodes—a condition that is undesirable. This improper operation may propagate to neighboring cells. As a result of such propagation, one or more cells may encounter a transient overvoltage. This transient overvoltage will occur, for example, in situations where the output voltage at V_HIGH_OUT is maintained at a high level due to the effect of the decoupling capacitor. It is an object of this invention to reduce or eliminate this problem.
The present invention reduces or eliminates the identified problems by providing novel circuitry and modes of operation for use with cascaded voltage elevation cells. The present invention reduces or eliminates these problems by providing for coupling a corrective circuitry to nodes vlow and vhigh in parallel to a cell within the cascaded structure.
In one embodiment, the corrective circuitry may be a long-channel PMOS transistor. This type of corrective circuitry is useful in reducing or eliminating the unequal voltage distribution encountered in the first problematic situation described above.
In another embodiment, the corrective circuitry may be a capacitor. This type of corrective circuitry is useful in reducing or eliminating the unequal voltage distribution encountered in the second problematic situation described above.
In yet another embodiment, the corrective circuitry may be a long-channel PMOS transistor coupled in parallel with a capacitor. This type of corrective circuitry is useful in reducing or eliminating the unequal voltage distribution encountered in either the first problematic situation or the second problematic situation described above.
Though the present invention is described in the context of cross-coupled MOS inverter cells, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the scope of the invention extends beyond such cells to other types of cells that encounter the identified problems.
The above and other objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
The long-channel PMOS transistor M5 may be useful in reducing or eliminating the unequal voltage distribution encountered in at least the first problematic situation described above. The transistor M5 is preferably formed with an equivalent impedance that remains high enough during operation such that M5 will not overly-shorten the voltage multiplier cell and thereby render the cell overly inefficient. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that numerous variations in the formation of the voltage multiplier cell and transistor M5, as well as differing desirable efficiency levels coupled with differing desired performance of the transistor M5 will result in numerous variations in the desired equivalent impedance of transistor M5. Another consideration in forming transistor M5 is that current through M5 should preferably remain significantly above the maximum expected leakage current on nodes vlow and vhigh. Ensuring this current level will ensure the expected regular voltage drops throughout the complete ladder of cells, assuming that each of the cells is formed with equivalent corrective circuitry. Notably, similar to the other CMOS devices within the cell, PMOS transistor M5 will only encounter the local voltage difference within the cell. Thus, transistor M5 may also be and is preferably formed using a relatively thin oxide layer. Another benefit of using the disclosed transistor M5 is that the non-linear characteristic of transistor M5 will help avoid overvoltage. Specifically, the stages with the highest voltage difference will be more strongly discharged by transistor M5.
The capacitor C3 is useful in reducing or eliminating the unequal voltage distribution encountered in at least the second problematic situation described above. To solve this type of second problematic situation, it is desirable to ensure that the clock signal is of sufficient amplitude. When the clock signal has been restored to sufficient amplitude, the remaining problem occurring due to relatively fast variation of the output load current or a output voltage may be solved by placing capacitor C3 in the circuit, coupled to vhigh via node 301 and vlow via node 302. The capacitor C3 preferably should be formed to ensure sufficient decoupling to assist with providing brief direct current flow through the inverters during switching. In this manner, capacitor C3 will ease the fast and complete switching of the cross-coupled inverters. As described above with respect to transistor M5, capacitor C3 will only encounter the relatively small local voltage difference within the cell. Thus, capacitor C3 may be efficiently implemented by a thin oxide MOS transistor. Because the amount of area used by the capacitor upon the semiconductor device will often be a concern, the capacitance of capacitor C3 can be relatively very low, resulting in a reduction of the area filled by the capacitor. Capacitor C3 will provide at least some useful effects even if its capacitance is lower than the capacitance of capacitor C1 and/or capacitor C2.
Alternatively, it is possible to form the corrective circuitry with microelectrical devices that function similarly to a long-channel PMOS transistor with respect to the problem of irregular voltage distribution. For example depending upon the device composition and geometry, it may be desirable to replace long-channel PMOS transistor M5 with one or more of the following, which are contemplated by the present invention but are not explicitly illustrated, a long-channel NMOS transistor, resistors having high resistance, diodes, a plurality of NMOS transistors, a plurality of PMOS transistors, or other circuitry that ensures low levels of conductance between vhigh and vlow in any given voltage multiplier cell, such that the purposes of the long-channel PMOS transistor M5 are accomplished.
The corrective circuitry illustrated in
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/712,151, filed Oct. 10, 2012.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61712151 | Oct 2012 | US |