A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. This patent document may show and/or describe matter which is or may become trade dress of the owner. The copyright and trade dress owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright and trade dress rights whatsoever.
This disclosure relates to a safe locking system (boltwork) that provides a means to operate one of two (or more) safe locks of any type to facilitate safe opening.
In the security safe industry, a safe lock is the heart of a safe locking system. The safe lock itself is a blocking device that prevents the movement of a larger, much more robust system of moveable bolts and/or bars that engage the jambs in the safe body, preventing door opening. This larger moving system that keeps the door engaged with the body of the safe is commonly referred to as the boltwork.
To open a safe, one must first unlock the safe lock, then actuate the boltwork to an unlocked position before the door can be opened.
Safe locks come in a vast array of types and designs. Mechanical combination locks, using an external circular dial and internal rotary wheel lock, have been the standard for safe locks for centuries. More recent innovations have come about as electronic technologies matured, where electromechanical locks have been developed using digital circuitry coupled to actuators like solenoids and motors.
E-locks are desirable because they provide many “features” that provide a higher degree of security, much quicker access, they can be operated in the dark with lighted entry keys, they can record operational data, rapid authentication code changes without the need to hire a skilled technician, integration with external digital systems, silent signal alarm triggering, and many other desirable capabilities.
With the advent of electronic locks (e-locks) comes issues of reliability that are not found with mechanical safe locks. Electronics are somewhat less reliable than mechanical locks, whereas when they do fail, there is seldom an opportunity to resolve the failure without destructive penetration of the safe. In contrast, mechanical locks tend to fail more gradually, and generally allow a skilled technician an opportunity to open the lock without destructive measures.
E-locks also rely on a power source, which is prone to decay. In some use cases, the reliability of rapid access to the safe contents is a serious concern, as in weapons storage where the user requires quick acquisition of their defensive tools. The failure of the power source, be that battery or domestic power sources, is a worry for the consumer. In contrast, the mechanical lock does not suffer from this issue.
In addition, there is a general concern by a segment of the population that fear the potential failure of the e-lock from the instruments of war, such as an Electro-magnetic pulse (EMP) attack. In this case, the access to self-defense weapons could be vital to survival, and the destructive forces of the EMP event could render the e-lock useless.
So, there is a strong market preference to provide the reliability of the mechanical lock, and enjoy the convenience and rich feature capabilities of e-locks.
In recent years, lock manufacturers have come to resolve this dilemma with specialized safe locks that provide both digital functionality, coupled with a mechanical combination backup mechanism.
These types of locks suffer from some disadvantages. The “redundant locks” are much more complex, as hence very expensive. They have proven to be less reliable, due to the complex union of the mechanical and digital lock mechanism.
The redundant locks also tend to be much larger, such that they don't fit within the confines of a conventional safe lock envelope. This results in the undesirable requirement to modify the safe design to accommodate these dual-function redundant locks.
A disclosed safe locking system provides a means to operate one of two (or more) safe locks of any type to facilitate safe opening of a door. The safe door can be opened by operating either of two locks, regardless of the type or style; e.g., e-locks and mechanical locks. A sliding bar assembly is mounted to the rear face of the safe door for displacing the boltwork into and out of the door frame. Extension of the lock bolts of both locks prevents movement of a main locking bar and attached boltwork, which prevents a user from opening the door. Retraction of either of the lock bolts permits sliding movement of the main locking bar, such that a user can unlock the door from the frame.
It is desirable to provide means to use any mix of lock types and brands, such that the consumer has a choice of select any pairing of locks they desire based on reliability, cosmetic appeal, features and cost. A solution is disclosed herein where all of the consumer's needs are met. The safe can be opened by operating either of two locks, regardless of the type or style. The unique solution is in the boltwork mechanism, not in the locks themselves. The redundant boltwork lock mechanism is very compact in design, facilitating conventional safe locking system integration without considerable changes in the boltwork system.
The 5-spoke handle 26 seen in
The drive plate 50 lies flush against the inner face of the door panel 25 except for a vertical flange 52 that is bent 90°. Three fasteners (not numbered) secure the vertical flange 52 to a vertically-oriented and movable carriage bar 54, having bent flanges 55, that carries the three locking bolts 28. Thus, horizontal movement of the drive plate 50 causes horizontal movement of the carriage bar 54 and three locking bolts 28 which can be extended into a locked position or retracted into an open position. The combination of the carriage bar 54 and locking bolts 28 make up the so-called moving “boltwork.”
The locking bolts 28 extend through apertures in a fixed bolt guide 56 that is secured to the inner face of the door panel 25, such as by welding. A second fixed bolt guide 58 having one whole and two half fixed locking bolts 60 is also secured to the inner face of the door panel 25 on the side having hinges (not shown). Because of the projection of the fixed locking bolts 60 and the complementary configuration of the door frame (not shown) on the hinge side, the safe door 20 is securely held to the door frame on both sides when closed and the locking bolts 28 extended.
The redundant boltwork lock system works in the same basic way of a conventional boltwork, where a lock is actuated to remove the blocking of the larger bolt-moving mechanism that holds the door shut. However, in the redundant boltwork lock system, either or both locks 22, 24 can be articulated to allow the boltwork to be retracted. The key element in the mechanism is a rotating cam 70 seen on the right side in
Prior to describing the boltwork movement,
A second pair of horizontal slots 90, 92 are provided on the right end of each of the lock slides 36, 38. Shoulder bolts 94 extend through the slots 90, 92 and are secured respectively to two threaded apertures 96 to the right end of the main locking bar 40. In this manner, the main locking bar 40 may slide horizontally relative to the fixed studs 80a, 80b, and both of the lock slides 36, 38 may slide relative to the main locking bar 40. Furthermore, both of the lock slides 36, 38 are biased to the right on the main locking bar 40 by springs 98 attached between small studs on each lock slide and studs on the locking bar 40 (studs not numbered for clarity).
It should also be noted that the upper lock slide 36 is shorter than the lower lock slide 38 and the two lock slides have mating shapes. The lower lock slide 38 has an enlarged left end in which is formed the slot 88, and an elongated portion that extends to its right end and the slot 92. The upper lock slide 36 also has an enlarged left end in which is formed the slot 86, and an elongated portion that extends to its right end and the slot 90. As seen best in
The cam member 70 has a pair of angled edges which abut against chamfered edges on the right end of each of the lock slides 36, 38, as seen. Because both of the lock slides 36, 38 are prevented from moving to the left by the latch bolts 32, 34 they also contact and prevent any rotational or leftward movement of the cam member 70.
In
During these movements, the lower lock slide 38 remains in place because of the extension of the latch bolt 34 into its cutout. Interaction between the lower angled edge of cam member 70 and the chamfered edge on the lower lock slide 38 causes the cam member to rotate in a CCW direction, as shown. Once the door is subsequently closed and the boltwork returned to its locked position as seen in
In
In something of a mirror image of
Dual locks are not a novelty in safe technology, but they have always been blocking a common “Locking Bar,” such that both locks would require opening to articulate the boltwork. The redundant boltwork lock system presents a compound locking bar that alternates with either lock opening allowing boltwork retraction. Incidentally, both locks can also be opened in the redundant boltwork lock system, even though not necessary.
Closing Comments
Throughout this description, the embodiments and examples shown should be considered as exemplars, rather than limitations on the apparatus and procedures disclosed or claimed. Although many of the examples presented herein involve specific combinations of method acts or system elements, it should be understood that those acts and those elements may be combined in other ways to accomplish the same objectives. With regard to flowcharts, additional and fewer steps may be taken, and the steps as shown may be combined or further refined to achieve the methods described herein. Acts, elements and features discussed only in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from a similar role in other embodiments.
As used herein, “plurality” means two or more. As used herein, a “set” of items may include one or more of such items. As used herein, whether in the written description or the claims, the terms “comprising”, “including”, “carrying”, “having”, “containing”, “involving”, and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of”, respectively, are closed or semi-closed transitional phrases with respect to claims.
This patent claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 from Provisional Patent Application No. 62/446,776, filed Jan. 16, 2017, titled “REDUNDANT BOLT LOCKWORK”, which is expressly incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2732815 | Paca et al. | Jan 1956 | A |
2869485 | Deaton | Jan 1959 | A |
3249074 | Deaton | May 1966 | A |
3329106 | Lingal | Jul 1967 | A |
4470277 | Uyeda | Sep 1984 | A |
5231935 | Oder | Aug 1993 | A |
5341752 | Hambleton | Aug 1994 | A |
5603234 | Lozier | Feb 1997 | A |
6679087 | Suggs | Jan 2004 | B2 |
8479543 | Yang | Jul 2013 | B2 |
9097057 | Pendleton | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9238929 | Cho | Jan 2016 | B2 |
20120060726 | Yao | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62446776 | Jan 2017 | US |