The disclosure herein relates generally to electronic communications, and more particularly to coding and decoding received data in electronic communications.
Transferring information between computers and other electronic devices can be implemented using any of a variety of different standards and technologies. Channel coding and error correction techniques can be used to reduce errors in received signals introduced from distortion and other disturbances. Such coding and error correction can be implemented using an encoder and a decoder at the ends of the transmission channel.
One increasingly popular communication standard is 10 Gigabit Ethernet, with a nominal data rate of 10 Gbit/s. 10GBASE-T is one such standard used to provide 10 gigabit per second connections over unshielded or shielded twisted pair cables.
As shown in
The resulting frame is mapped to 128-DSQ symbols, and the resulting DSQ symbols are then precoded using THP. Each of these 512 128-DSQ symbols are then transmitted as a pair of PAM-16 symbols (x-axis and y-axis), to create 1024 symbols (3584 bits). The constellation for 128-DSQ symbols is shown in
The receiver unscrambles a received frame and decodes the coded bits. Any of several decoding algorithms for LDPC codes can be used in the receiver to decode the received coded bits. For example, iterative decoders are often used to converge on a correct decoded value. In one implementation, LDPC decoding is performed in the receiver using a soft-decision, message-passing algorithm. The bits are treated as continuous variables which represent the probability of the value being a 0 or a 1, and the continuous variables are represented in the decoding algorithm as Log Likelihood Ratios (LLRs). The message passing algorithm sets the variable nodes to the soft receive LLRs, calculates the syndrome LLRs given the variable LLRs, updates the variable LLRs with the new syndrome information, and iterates in this same way until a convergence is reached (e.g., check bits are zero). Using the 10GBASE-T transmission scheme, it is possible to have very low bit error rates that come very close to the Shannon limit of the communication channel.
While the transmission scheme described above works well for its intended applications, it would be desirable to utilize the 10GBASE-T frame structure for data rate transmissions greater than 10 Gbps, such as 40 Gbps.
Embodiments of methods of signaling along a high-speed Ethernet link are disclosed. In one embodiment, a BASE-T Ethernet transceiver is disclosed. The transceiver includes a BASE-T Ethernet transmit circuit that employs a data framing module. The data framing module includes an input interface to receive Ethernet block data bits, and logic to aggregate the Ethernet block data bits in accordance with a 512/513B code. A forward error correction encoder is coupled to the logic to encode at least a first portion of the data bits to generate first error check bits. A Reed-Solomon (RS) encoder is coupled to the logic to encode at least a second portion of the data bits in accordance with a Reed-Solomon error code to generate second error check bits.
The inventor has discovered that by re-organizing the various groups of bits in a given 10GBASE-T transport frame, employing Reed-Solomon check bits within the frame, and coding certain control bits, that data transmissions may be successfully carried out at data rates far surpassing 10 Gbps, such as up to 40 Gbps. As a result, the embodiments described herein are suitable for use in 40GBASE-T environments.
Current 40GBASE-T proposals reuse the 10GBASE-T frame. As described above, within the 10GBASE-T frame are various groups of bits including an auxiliary bit, eight CRC-8 error check bits, and fifty 65B frames, for a total of 3259 payload bits. Of these bits, 1723 of them are protected via LDPC coding, while 1536 (512×3) are uncoded for 10GBASE-T data rates. For 40GBASE-T data rates, up to 40 Gbps, the uncoded bits need to be protected by some form of error coding.
As an overview, Reed-Solomon error coding schemes are block-based error control codes, built using Galois field elements. Galois fields can be constructed from powers of prime numbers. 2N is a very popular choice, which leads to a maximum block size of 2N−1 symbols. For example, 28 gives a maximum block size of 255 bytes. The general format is M data symbols plus 2T check symbols.
For Reed-Solomon codes, the 2T check symbols can locate and correct T errored symbols, and detect the presence of 2T errored symbols. One way to look at this is that for each errored symbol, we need one symbol to locate the error within the block, and another symbol to contain the correction. The code is described as RS2N (“Total symbols”, “Payload symbols”). For example, the code RS256(128, 120) would have 120 payload bytes in a frame with 8 check bytes capable of correcting 4 bytes in the frame. The optimal RS block size is usually chosen such that 2N symbols are just slightly larger than the number of symbols you have to correct. This generally maximizes the number of correctable symbols within the block.
One proposal for a 40GBASE-T scheme based on the 10GBASE-T frame (described above) converts the fifty 65B blocks into two 65B blocks plus twelve 257B blocks, thus freeing up thirty-six bits Eliminating the eight CRC-8 check bits brings the total available number of bits to forty-four. The proposal goes on to recommend using an eleven-bit symbol to create a two-symbol correcting Reed-Solomon RS2048 code with the available bits. Thus, the 1536 bits map into 140 eleven-bit symbols with 4× zero bits, resulting in an RS2048 (144,140) code. While this may work for its intended applications, the symbol size is not optimal, as RS2048 can deal with a 2047×11-bit block—a very large block size.
As an alternative, working in a 2N-based field, one may employ an RS256 code that gives a maximum block size of 255×8=2040 bits, enough to cover the 1536 bits (192 bytes) that need protecting. However, in order to make RS256 effective, at least 48 bits (3×8-bit symbols) need to be freed from the 10GBASE-T frame (instead of only 44 bits, as proposed above).
Reorganizing the 10GBASE-T frame structure to free up at least 48 bits, in one embodiment, involves converting the fifty 65B blocks into two 65B blocks plus six 513B blocks to free up 42 bits. The 42 bits may then be combined with the eight CRC-8 check bits for a total of 50 free bits. This allows for using an 8-bit symbol to create a three-symbol correcting RS256 code in the frame structure. Thus, 1536 bits maps into 192 8-bit symbols with 2× zero bits, giving us an RS256(198, 192) code.
In order to successfully carry out the conversions above to 512/513B encoding, certain sub-coding steps are employed. 40GBASE-R employs a 64/66B PCS that uses eleven block field types to transport all of the “Start-of-Frame”, “End-of-Frame”, and ordered set information received from the XLGMII interface.
The resulting mapping is shown in
The symbols are then transmitted at a desired symbol rate by a transmitter across plural twisted pair copper channels “Pair A”, “Pair B”, “Pair C” and “Pair D.” The transmit symbol rate for one embodiment may be matched to the expected rated bandwidth (half the symbol rate) of the physical channels provided by the cable. Other data rates may be utilized by varying the symbol rate and/or the symbol mapping scheme.
With continued reference to
The symbols are then transmitted at a desired symbol rate by a transmitter 824 across plural physical channels CHN A, CHN B, CHN C and CHN D. The transmit symbol rate for one embodiment may be matched to the expected rated bandwidth (half the symbol rate) of the physical channels provided by the cable. Other data rates may be utilized by varying the symbol rate and/or the symbol mapping scheme.
At the receive side of the channel, an inverse process is carried out by a receiver link partner to retrieve the data and to decode the contents. The Reed-Solomon coding described above enables for corrections to up to three 8-bit symbols at data rates up to 40 Gbps, while still utilizing the transport frame corresponding to the 10GBASE-T standard.
Those having skill in the art will appreciate the many benefits and advantages afforded by the embodiments presented herein. Of significant benefit is the ability to reuse 10GBASE-T transport frame structures for data rates far surpassing 10 Gbps. Further, by incorporating Trowbridge coding, 512/513B coding may be employed, which allows for an optimal RS error coding solution.
In the foregoing description and in the accompanying drawings, specific terminology and drawing symbols have been set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. In some instances, the terminology and symbols may imply specific details that are not required to practice the invention. For example, any of the specific numbers of bits, signal path widths, signaling or operating frequencies, component circuits or devices and the like may be different from those described above in alternative embodiments. Also, the interconnection between circuit elements or circuit blocks shown or described as multi-conductor signal links may alternatively be single-conductor signal links, and single conductor signal links may alternatively be multi-conductor signal links. Signals and signaling paths shown or described as being single-ended may also be differential, and vice-versa. Similarly, signals described or depicted as having active-high or active-low logic levels may have opposite logic levels in alternative embodiments. Component circuitry within integrated circuit devices may be implemented using metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) technology, bipolar technology or any other technology in which logical and analog circuits may be implemented.
With respect to terminology, a signal is said to be “asserted” when the signal is driven to a low or high logic state (or charged to a high logic state or discharged to a low logic state) to indicate a particular condition. Conversely, a signal is said to be “deasserted” to indicate that the signal is driven (or charged or discharged) to a state other than the asserted state (including a high or low logic state, or the floating state that may occur when the signal driving circuit is transitioned to a high impedance condition, such as an open drain or open collector condition). A signal driving circuit is said to “output” a signal to a signal receiving circuit when the signal driving circuit asserts (or deasserts, if explicitly stated or indicated by context) the signal on a signal line coupled between the signal driving and signal receiving circuits. A signal line is said to be “activated” when a signal is asserted on the signal line, and “deactivated” when the signal is deasserted. Additionally, the prefix symbol “/” attached to signal names indicates that the signal is an active low signal (i.e., the asserted state is a logic low state). A line over a signal name (e.g., ‘ ’) is also used to indicate an active low signal. The term “coupled” is used herein to express a direct connection as well as a connection through one or more intervening circuits or structures. Integrated circuit device “programming” may include, for example and without limitation, loading a control value into a register or other storage circuit within the device in response to a host instruction and thus controlling an operational aspect of the device, establishing a device configuration or controlling an operational aspect of the device through a one-time programming operation (e.g., blowing fuses within a configuration circuit during device production), and/or connecting one or more selected pins or other contact structures of the device to reference voltage lines (also referred to as strapping) to establish a particular device configuration or operation aspect of the device. The term “exemplary” is used to express an example, not a preference or requirement.
While the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. For example, features or aspects of any of the embodiments may be applied, at least where practicable, in combination with any other of the embodiments or in place of counterpart features or aspects thereof. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This Application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to Provisional Application No. 62/102,993, filed Jan. 13, 2015, entitled REED-SOLOMON CODING FOR 40GBASE-T ETHERNET, and is expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5680400 | York | Oct 1997 | A |
6052385 | Kanerva | Apr 2000 | A |
6081523 | Merchant et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6111890 | Rao | Aug 2000 | A |
6195360 | Raza et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
7027407 | Diepstraten et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7324511 | Nishihara | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7525992 | Shachal | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7567620 | Rozental | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7593431 | Lo et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7693240 | Mezer | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7720075 | Costo | May 2010 | B2 |
7782852 | Tellado et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8112646 | Tsai | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8201005 | Wertheimer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8218612 | Chien | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8243752 | Barkan | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8276013 | Diab et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8320411 | Sedarat et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
9143142 | Meagher | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20020006167 | McFarland | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020119783 | Bourlas et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030016797 | Zakrzewski | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040298 | Heatley | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040184810 | Spilman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050018784 | Kurobe | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050030808 | Brown et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055467 | Campana et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058152 | Oksanen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050105545 | Thousand et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050152466 | Maltsev et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050259685 | Chang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050286521 | Chiang | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060109784 | Weller et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060153307 | Brown et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060215561 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070192505 | Dalmia | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070248024 | Conway et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080095188 | Remy | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080151792 | Taich | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080187028 | Lida | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080294919 | Lida et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090080459 | Barkan | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090150745 | Langner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090282277 | Sedarat | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100075704 | McHenry et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100115295 | Diab | May 2010 | A1 |
20100188980 | Desai et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100241923 | Wang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110249687 | Diab et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120026922 | Diab | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120063295 | Bliss | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120106345 | Diab | May 2012 | A1 |
20120170591 | Diab et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188894 | Huschke et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130070823 | Malkin et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140040704 | Wu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20150030337 | Mateosky | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150067380 | Zhan et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Ken Christense et al., IEEE 802.3az The Road to Energy Efficient Ethernet, IEEE Communications Magazine, Nov. 2010, 7 Pages. |
Hugh Barrass, EEE Exchange of Management Information, IEEE 802.3az EEE Task Force, Mar. 2009, Vancouver, British Columbia, 11 Pages. |
Nariman Yousefi, Multi Rate PHY, IEEE Meeting Slides, Jul. 2003, 14 pages. |
Zhang et al; IEEE Apr. 2010; pp. 843-855; “An Efficient 10GBASE-T Ethernet LDPC Decoder Design with Low Error Floors”. |
Mankar et al.; ACEEE, Proc of Intl. Conf. on Recent Trends in Information, Telecommunication and Computing, ITC; 5 pages; “Algorithms and Architectures for Reduced Complexity LDPC Decoding”. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62102993 | Jan 2015 | US |