Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6237545
-
Patent Number
6,237,545
-
Date Filed
Friday, April 7, 200024 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, May 29, 200123 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
- Kellogg Brown & Root, INC
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 122 23523
- 122 23533
- 122 246
- 122 247
- 122 248
- 122 249
- 122 250 S
- 122 511
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
Refinery process furnaces are disclosed that have horizontal-helical radiant coils and/or improved ladder-type supports for the horizontal tubes. The coils have a tubeside fluid flow path from an inlet pipe section through an alternating series of straight horizontal pipe sections and wide sweep return bends to an outlet pipe section. The horizontal pipe sections are arranged in at least two vertical banks that are parallel and horizontally spaced apart. The bent pipe sweep return bends are arranged in vertical banks at either end of the straight pipe banks. Each bend connects a pair of straight pipe sections in adjacent vertical banks, and each return bend is sloped between horizontal and vertical so that one of the straight pipe sections in the connected pair thereof is elevated with respect to the other. The ladder supports have two opposing columns with a number of vertically spaced support members each having a generally horizontal upper engagement surface. The horizontal tubes in the furnace are supported on cradles formed in transverse crosspieces that have opposite ends engaged by the support members, each end of the crosspiece having a generally horizontal lower engagement surface supported on the upper engagement surface, which allows for horizontal, upward or angled movement of the transverse crosspiece with respect to the support members that can occur due to thermal expansion thereof or shifting of the vertical columns with respect to each other.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to refinery process furnaces, and more particularly to furnace improvements relating to the radiant coil and to the tube supports for horizontal sections of the coil.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Refinery process furnaces are widely used to heat hydrocarbons in a variety of services, for example, crude oil feed to an atmospheric tower, crude residuum from the atmospheric tower for feed to a vacuum tower, and the like. Perhaps the most severe service is the heating of feedstock to a delayed coker. While coke deposition can be a problem in any refinery process furnace, because of the high temperatures employed and the residual nature of the coker feedstock, there is a pronounced tendency for the formation of coke deposits on the inside wall of the radiant tubing through the coker preheat furnace.
Regardless of service, the formation of coke deposits is not desirable. Coke deposits can lead to increased pressure in the tubes due to the restriction of flow, and to higher tube wall temperatures due to the insulative effects of the coke deposits. Both higher pressure and higher temperature lead to premature failure of the tubes. Furthermore, it is often necessary to periodically remove the tube from service and remove the coke deposits by burning off the deposited coke by oxidation with air or another oxidant that is passed through the tube at a high temperature. This periodic burn-off can result in severe thermal cycling which also reduces the life of the tube.
One factor that has been identified as contributing to high coke formation rates and high tube metal temperatures is the presence of heat flux imbalances. See Martin, G. R., “Heat-Flux Imbalances in Fired Heaters Cause Operating Problems,”
Hydrocarbon Processing,
pp. 103-109 (May 1998). Heat-flux imbalances can be caused by many factors, such as, for example, furnace design and furnace operating conditions, including such things as the ratio of radiant section height to width, burner-to-tube distances, number and type of burners, flame shape, air preheat and air temperature, radiant section tube layout, one or more burners out of service, insufficient air to burners, fuel gas composition, burner fuel pressure, higher-than-normal firing rates, fouled burner tips, eroded burner tip orifices, insufficient draft, and the like.
In multi-pass heating arrangements, the tube layouts in existing heaters are generally different for each pass, i.e. each pass is positioned in a different place in the furnace. A pass located at the bottom of the furnace will see a flame temperature of 3000-3500° F. (1650-1930° C.) near its outlet, but a pass located near the arch at the top of the radiant section will see much lower temperatures. One way to compensate for heat-flux imbalances is to control the relative rates of feedstock supplied to each pass so that the outlet temperatures are about the same. However, this still does not avoid the existence of hot spots in individual tube passes that can lead to localized coke deposition.
An improvement over wall-mounted tube runs in the radiant section is the double-fired heater in U.S. Pat. No. 5,078,857 to Melton. This uses a bank of tubes running centrally through the firebox with a row of burners on either side thereof. The tubes pass through slots in the end wall of the radiant section, and an insulated header cover encloses the conventional returns. Unfortunately, this tube design still does not allow the placement of multiple passes within a single firebox that have the same heating pattern and fluxes in each pass.
It would be desirable to have available a multi-pass furnace design which allows the various passes to have about the same heating pattern and heat fluxes. It would also be desirable to increase the effective tube-heating surface of each pass, while at the same time reducing the pressure drop through the tubing. Further, it would also be desirable to eliminate the need for insulated end-tube header boxes and provide an improved manner of supporting the horizontal tubes. The present invention addresses these and other needs in the refinery process furnace art.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a radiant coil for a refinery process furnace. The coil has an inlet pipe section and an outlet pipe section. A plurality of essentially straight horizontal pipe sections are arranged in at least two vertical banks. The vertical banks are parallel and horizontally spaced apart. A plurality of bent pipe sweep return bends are arranged in vertical banks at either end of the straight pipe banks. Each bend connects a pair of straight pipe sections in adjacent vertical banks thereof. The return bends are sloped between horizontal and vertical, and one of the straight pipe sections in the pair connected by a return bend is elevated with respect to the other. A tubeside fluid flow path is provided from the inlet pipe section through an alternating series of the straight pipe sections and the return bends to the outlet pipe section. The coil preferably includes first and second vertical straight pipe banks and opposing return bend banks, wherein the straight pipe sections and the return bends are evenly spaced from adjacent sections and bends above and below except for uppermost and lowermost pipe sections and return bends. The return bends at either end of the adjacent tube banks can be oppositely sloped so as to provide a generally horizontal-helical flow pattern. The coil preferably has first and second nested passes wherein the fluid flow paths of the first and second passes each comprise a series of alternating straight pipe sections in each of said vertical banks thereof, wherein the straight pipe sections of the first pass in the first and second banks are horizontally spaced opposite the straight pipe sections of the second pass in the respective second and first banks. The first and second pass straight pipe sections in each vertical tube bank can be alternated every other one from top to bottom.
In an alternate embodiment, the coil also has nested third and fourth passes wherein the fluid flow paths of the third and fourth passes each comprise a series of alternating straight pipe sections in each of said vertical banks thereof wherein the straight pipe sections of the third pass in the first and second banks are horizontally spaced opposite the straight pipe sections of the fourth pass in the respective second and first banks. The first, second, third and fourth pass straight pipe sections in each vertical tube bank can be alternated every fourth one from top to bottom.
In a further alternate embodiment, the coil can also have nested fifth and sixth passes wherein the fluid flow paths of the fifth and sixth passes each comprise a series of alternating straight pipe sections in each of said vertical banks thereof wherein the straight pipe sections of the fifth pass in the first and second banks are horizontally spaced opposite the straight pipe sections of the sixth pass in the respective second and first banks. The first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth pass straight pipe sections in each vertical tube bank can be alternated every sixth one from top to bottom.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a refinery process furnace having a firebox, a coil and floor-mounted burners. The firebox has a floor, opposing vertical sidewalls, and opposing vertical end walls. The coil described above is disposed with the straight pipe banks and the return bend banks within the firebox. Endmost vertical straight pipe banks are evenly spaced from and generally parallel to the vertical side walls, each of the return bend banks are evenly spaced from the end walls, and the inlet and outlet sections are disposed for introducing a relatively cold fluid into the flow paths and discharging a heated fluid therefrom, respectively. Multiple rows of the floor-mounted burners are arranged alternately, and evenly spaced in plan with respect to the vertical straight pipe banks. The refinery process furnace preferably comprises a plurality of the coils arranged in a vertical stack with an uppermost coil and one or more lower coils beneath the upper coil, wherein the straight pipe banks and return bend banks in the coils are aligned in plan. In another embodiment, the present invention provides a refinery process furnace, comprising a firebox, at least one multiple-pass, double-row, helical-horizontal radiant coil, with nested tube-side flow paths, disposed completely within the firebox except for inlet and outlet piping at ends of passes thereof, which can optionally pass through a wall of the firebox or connect to another coil within the firebox, and three rows of floor-fired burners, one disposed between the rows of the coil and the other two disposed on either side of the rows of the coil and evenly spaced therefrom in plan. The firebox is preferably elongated with opposite ends provided with removable panels for removing and replacing the coil. Straight horizontal pipe sections of the coil rows can be supported by one or more spaced-apart ladders. The ladders comprise first and second vertical columns and a plurality of elongated spacer elements attached at either end thereof to the vertical columns to maintain the columns in horizontally spaced-apart relation. Opposing support members having a generally horizontal upper engagement surface are vertically spaced along the vertical columns. Transverse crosspieces have opposite ends engaged by the support members, each end having a generally horizontal lower engagement surface supported on the upper engagement surface which allows for any horizontal, upward or angled movement of the transverse crosspiece with respect to the support members due to thermal expansion thereof, or shifting of the vertical columns with respect to each other. A cradle is formed in the crosspieces for supporting the horizontal pipe section thereon.
In a further aspect of the invention, there is provided an improvement in a refinery process furnace having a plurality of horizontal pipe sections arranged in one or more vertical banks within a firebox wherein the horizontal pipe sections thereof are supported by one or more ladders. The improvement is that the ladder or ladders comprise first and second vertical columns, and a plurality of elongated spacer elements attached at either end thereof to the vertical columns to maintain the columns in horizontally spaced-apart relation. Opposing support members are vertically spaced along the vertical columns. The support members have a generally horizontal upper engagement surface. Transverse crosspieces have opposite ends engaged by the support members, each end having a generally horizontal lower engagement surface supported on the upper engagement surface which allows for any horizontal, upward or angled movement of the transverse crosspiece with respect to the support members due to thermal expansion thereof or shifting of the vertical columns with respect to each other. A cradle is formed in the crosspieces for supporting the horizontal pipe section thereon. The vertical columns can be supported at a lower end thereof on a floor of the firebox, or from an upper end thereof on an arch of the firebox. Or, the vertical columns can have an upper section having an upper end thereof supported from an arch of the firebox, and a lower section having a lower end thereof supported from a floor of the firebox, wherein an upper end of the lower section is slideably engaged with a lower end of the upper section to provide a continuous vertical column from the floor to the arch. The vertical columns can comprise I-beams, or rectangular tubular members that can be cooled by circulating air through the tubular members, for example, the air can be circulated by drafting through the tubular members. The support members preferably comprise a horizontal projection with a vertical slot formed therein and the crosspieces a generally horizontally projecting lateral member with a fin depending therefrom, wherein the fin is loosely received in the slot to limit lateral movement of the crosspiece, and wherein end-to-end movement of the crosspiece is limited by opposing stops between which the crosspiece is loosely received. The stops can be a vertical surface of the vertical columns positioned to engage the end of the crosspiece, or an end of the slot positioned to engage an outer end of the fin. The lateral member and the fin are preferably generally continuous from one end of the crosspiece to the other.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
is a side sectional view of a furnace in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 2
is an end sectional view of the furnace of FIG.
1
.
FIG. 3
is a plan view of the furnace of
FIGS. 1 and 2
.
FIG. 4
is a schematic drawing showing the flow paths of the four-pass radiant coil in the furnace of
FIGS. 1-3
.
FIG. 5
is a schematic drawing showing the flow paths of a two-pass radiant coil in accordance with an alternate embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 6
is a schematic drawing showing the flow paths of a six-pass radiant coil in accordance with an alternate embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 7
is a side elevation view of a ladder for supporting pipe sections in the furnace of
FIGS. 1-3
according to an embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 8
is a sectional view of the ladder of
FIG. 7
as seen along the lines
8
—
8
.
FIG. 9
is a sectional view of the ladder of
FIG. 7
as seen along the lines
9
—
9
.
FIG. 10
is an isometric view of the ladder of
FIGS. 7-9
.
FIG. 11
is a side elevation view of a ladder for supporting pipe sections in a furnace according to an alternate embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 12
is a sectional view of the ladder of
FIG. 11
as seen along the lines
12
—
12
.
FIG. 13
is a sectional view of the ladder of
FIG. 11
as seen along the lines
13
—
13
.
FIG. 14
is an isometric view of the ladder of
FIGS. 11-13
.
FIG. 15
(prior art) is a plot plan of a conventional four-cell furnace with one pass per cell and an associated stack showing a relatively large footprint.
FIG. 16
is a plot plan of a single-cell, four-pass furnace according to the principles of the present invention having the same heating capacity and throughput as the four-cell furnace of
FIG. 15
showing a considerably smaller footprint.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
With reference to
FIGS. 1-3
, a furnace
10
according to one embodiment of the present invention has a generally conventional convection section
12
and a radiant section or firebox
14
housing an upper radiant coil
16
and lower radiant coil
18
.
The firebox
14
has floor
20
, arch
22
, sidewalls
24
and end walls
26
, suitably lined with conventional refractory material
27
. A removable panel
28
(see
FIG. 3
) is provided in each end wall
26
for access to the coils
16
and
18
. Conventional access doors
30
A and
30
B may also be provided in the floor
20
or end walls
26
, respectively, or elsewhere in the furnace
10
. Conventional peep sights
31
are provided in the end walls
26
, which can be accessed by a platform
33
(see FIG.
3
), provided at either end of the furnace
10
.
Each of the radiant coils
16
and
18
comprises a pair of parallel banks
32
,
34
of horizontal tube or pipe sections
36
. The horizontal pipe sections
36
are arranged in the vertical banks
32
,
34
, one on top of the other, evenly spaced apart in each coil
16
,
18
. Preferably, the center-to-center vertical spacing of the horizontal pipe sections
36
in the vertical banks
32
,
34
from adjacent horizontal pipe sections
36
next above and/or below is about 1.5 to 2.5 times the outside diameter of the horizontal pipe sections
36
. For example, for nominal 4-inch (114.3 mm O.D.) pipe, the center-to-center spacing can be about 8 inches (203 mm) or allows for even tighter packing of the tubes to reduce the vertical height of the coils
16
,
18
, but still provides for relatively even heating around each of the pipe sections
36
.
Each radiant coil
16
,
18
also has a bank
38
of wide sweep return bends
40
. The return bends
40
have a larger radius than conventional return bends, such as “short-radius” (typically 2 times the nominal tube diameter) and “long-radius” (typically 3 times the nominal tube diameter). Preferably, the return bends
40
have a radius at least 5 times the nominal tube or pipe diameter, more preferably at least 7 times the nominal diameter, and especially at least 7.5 times the outside diameter. The radius of the return bends
40
should also be sufficient to allow the minimum horizontal-to-centerline clearance of the tube banks
32
,
34
to the centerline of the burners
44
per API Standard 560, Table 12, Column B, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. It is understood that the radius of the return bends
40
is measured along the centerline of the tube or pipe. For 4 inch nominal pipe (114.3 mm O.D.) and 4 mmBtu/hr gas-fired burners
44
, for example, we prefer an approximately 34-inch (864 mm) radius (a center-to-center spacing of 5 feet (1.524 m) between tube banks
32
,
34
and a 16-inch (406 mm) vertical drop between inlet and outlet horizontal pipe sections
36
in each pass). The length or run of each horizontal pipe section
36
is generally longer than the diameter of bends
40
so that the majority of the heat transfer is in the horizontal pipe sections
36
, although some heat transfer is also obtained in the return bends
40
.
As best illustrated in
FIG. 3
, the burners
42
,
44
are mounted in the floor
20
of the firebox
14
and arranged in plan in longitudinal rows
46
,
48
of outside burners
42
and row
50
of inside burners
44
. The burners
42
,
44
have conventionally associated fuel supplies, controls, valves, dampers, etc. (not shown) for supplying air and fuel to each burner
42
,
44
. A preheated air supply duct
49
is shown in
FIGS. 1 and 2
, along with air supply ducts
49
A,
49
B supplying air to the burners
42
,
44
, respectively.
The burners
42
,
44
in each row
46
,
48
,
50
are evenly spaced horizontally apart from each other and laterally from and/or between the vertical banks
32
,
34
of horizontal pipe sections
36
so as to evenly introduce heat into the firebox
14
and avoid flame impingement on the coils
16
,
18
. In general, the return bends
40
are spaced further from the burners
42
,
44
on the ends of each of the rows
46
,
48
,
50
than the horizontal pipe sections
36
are. The outside burners
42
are generally placed adjacent sidewalls
24
and produce a flat or planar flame generally parallel to the adjacent sidewall
24
. The inside burners
44
produce either a round or flat flame. Typically the inside burners
44
preferably produce about 1.5 times as much heat as the outside burners
42
.
Where the coils
16
,
18
comprise more than two vertical tube banks
32
,
34
, additional inside burners
44
are similarly situated in additional rows (not shown) evenly spaced between the additional vertical tube banks (not shown).
Each of the horizontal pipe sections
36
in the vertical banks
32
,
34
is supported at regular intervals by a plurality of ladders
52
as best illustrated in
FIGS. 1-3
. The ladders
52
can be supported with upper ends supported from the arch
22
, as illustrated with respect to upper coil
16
, or with lower ends mounted on the floor
20
, as illustrated with respect to lower coil
18
. The ladders
52
are preferably spaced between the burners
42
,
44
to minimize the temperatures to which they are exposed.
The return bends
40
can be made by bending tubing or pipe and cutting at 180 degree intervals. The coils
16
,
18
are then fabricated by welding the return bends
40
to the horizontal pipe sections
36
supported on the ladders
52
. The ladders
52
can be supported from the firebox
14
housing before or after assembly of the coils
16
,
18
. The furnace
10
is desirably fabricated, transported and assembled in a modularized configuration, providing each of the lower firebox section
14
A, upper firebox section
14
B and convection section
12
as modular units. The lower firebox section
14
A comprises a bottom half of the rectangular housing of the firebox
14
, the lower coil
18
and the lower section of each ladder
52
, pre-assembled with refractory lining
27
on the inside, and lower sections
54
of vertical support columns
56
and floor support members
58
secured on the outside. The lower firebox section
14
A is shipped to the installation site and placed with support columns
56
on concrete pilings
59
. Outlets O-
1
,O-
2
,O-
3
,O-
4
are welded or flanged to connecting piping (not shown).
The upper firebox section
14
B comprises a top half of the rectangular housing of the firebox
14
, the upper coil
16
and the upper section of each ladder
52
, likewise pre-assembled with refractory lining
27
on the inside, and upper sections
60
of vertical support columns
56
and top support members
62
secured on the outside. The upper firebox section
14
B is placed on top of lower firebox section
14
A and perimeter flanges
64
are bolted together to connect the sections
14
A,
14
B. The lower outlet tubing from the upper coil
16
is field-welded to the upper inlet tubing to the lower coil
18
at either end of the relatively longer wide sweep return bends
66
.
The convection section
12
is likewise shipped pre-assembled with refractory lining
27
, exterior vertical support members
70
and horizontal lower support members
72
. The convection section
12
can be attached to the firebox
14
by securing the perimeter flanges
74
between the upper firebox section
14
B and the convection section
12
. The horizontal support members
72
of the convection section
12
are aligned with the top support members
62
of the upper firebox section
14
B, and can also be bolted together. The support members
62
,
72
pass through transverse passages
75
at the bottom of the convection section
12
and line up with the ladders
52
and the vertical support members
56
for strength reinforcement. The furnace
10
thus has a flat head arch configuration with flue gas passages from the firebox
14
between the transverse passages
75
and the end walls of the convection section
12
. The inlets I-
1
,I-
2
,I-
3
,I-
4
to the convection section
12
are welded or flanged to connecting piping (not shown). The crossover piping
76
between the convection section
12
and the inlet piping into the upper coil
16
is connected outside the furnace
10
. Other conventional arch configurations are also suitably employed with the coil design of the present invention.
The breach on the top of the convection section
12
is secured thereto, for example, by bolting at the top perimeter flange
78
. The breaching (not shown) is conventional and can be a breaching tapered to a stack and/or ducted through an air preheater exchanger (not shown).
The embodiment illustrated in
FIGS. 1-3
shows nested four-pass radiant coils
16
,
18
, which produce a helical-horizontal flow pattern. As shown schematically in
FIG. 4
, in the four-pass embodiment, the inlets I-
1
, I-
2
for the respective first and second passes feed into the topmost tubes
100
,
102
on the respective left and right tube banks
104
,
106
. The inlets I-
3
,I-
4
for the respective third and fourth passes feed into the second highest tubes
108
,
110
just beneath the uppermost tubes
100
,
102
, respectively. The inlets I-
1
,I-
3
are at the far end of the tube bank
104
, whereas the inlets I-
2
,I-
4
are at the near end of the tube bank
106
, establishing opposite horizontal flow directions. At the near end of the tube bank
104
, wide sweep return bends
112
,
114
pass fluid from the end of tubes
100
,
108
into third and fourth sequential tubes
116
,
118
in tube bank
106
, respectively. The first and third pass fluids then pass through far-end wide sweep return bends
120
,
122
, fifth and sixth tubes
124
,
126
in left tube bank
104
, near-end wide sweep return bends
128
,
130
, and finally in penultimate and lowermost tubes
132
,
134
to the far-end outlets O-
1
,O-
3
in right tube bank
106
, respectively. Similarly, second and fourth pass fluids pass from the far ends of tubes
102
,
110
in right tube bank
106
, through far-end wide sweep return bends
136
,
138
, third and fourth highest tubes
140
,
142
in left tube bank
104
, near-end wide sweep return bends
144
,
146
, fifth and sixth highest tubes
148
,
150
in right tube bank
106
, far-end wide sweep return bends
152
,
154
, and continue this helical-horizontal flow pattern finally through penultimate and lowermost tubes
156
,
158
to the near-end outlets O-
2
,O-
4
.
As shown schematically in
FIG. 5
, in the two-pass embodiment, the inlets I-
1
, I-
2
for the respective first and second passes feed into the topmost tubes
200
,
202
on the respective left and right tube banks
204
,
206
. The inlet I-
1
is at the far end of the tube bank
204
, whereas the inlet I-
2
is at the near end of the tube bank
206
, establishing opposite horizontal flow directions. At the near end of the tube bank
204
, wide sweep return bend
212
passes fluid from the end of tube
200
into second sequential tube
216
in tube bank
206
. The first pass fluid then passes through far-end wide sweep return bend
220
, third tube
224
in left tube bank
204
, near-end wide sweep return bend
228
, continues this helical-horizontal flow pattern finally into lowermost tube
232
to the far-end outlet O-
1
in right tube bank
206
. Similarly, second pass fluid passes from the far end of tube
202
in right tube bank
206
, through far-end wide sweep return bend
236
, second highest tube
240
in left tube bank
204
, near-end wide sweep return bend
244
, third highest tube
248
in right tube bank
206
, far-end wide sweep return bend
252
, and continues this helical-horizontal flow pattern finally through lowermost tube
256
to the near-end outlet O-
2
.
As shown schematically in
FIG. 6
, in the six-pass embodiment, the inlets I-
1
, I-
2
for the respective first and second passes feed into the topmost tubes
300
,
302
on the respective left and right tube banks
304
,
306
. The inlets I-
3
,I-
4
for the respective third and fourth passes feed into the second highest tubes
308
,
310
just beneath the uppermost tubes
300
,
302
, respectively. The inlets I-
5
,I-
6
for the respective fifth and sixth passes feed into the third highest tubes
312
,
314
just beneath the second highest tubes
308
,
310
, respectively. The inlets I-
1
,I-
3
,I-
5
are at the far end of the tube bank
304
, whereas the inlets I-
2
,I-
4
,I-
6
are at the near end of the tube bank
306
, establishing opposite horizontal flow directions. At the near end of the tube bank
304
, wide sweep return bends
316
,
318
,
320
pass fluid from the end of tubes
300
,
308
,
312
into fourth, fifth and sixth sequential tubes
322
,
324
,
326
in tube bank
306
, respectively. The first, third and fifth pass fluids then pass through far-end wide sweep return bends
328
,
330
,
332
, seventh, eighth and ninth tubes
334
,
336
,
338
in left tube bank
304
, and continue in this helical-horizontal flow pattern finally into third-to-last, penultimate and lowermost tubes
340
,
342
,
344
to the far-end outlets O-
1
,O-
3
,O-
5
in right tube bank
306
, respectively. Similarly, second, fourth and sixth pass fluids pass from the far ends of tubes
302
,
310
,
314
in right tube bank
306
, through far-end wide sweep return bends
346
,
348
,
350
, fourth, fifth and sixth sequential tubes
352
,
354
,
356
in left tube bank
304
, near-end wide sweep return bends
358
,
360
,
362
, and continue this helical-horizontal flow pattern finally through third-to-last, penultimate and lowermost tubes
364
,
366
,
368
to the near-end outlets O-
2
,O-
4
,O-
6
which form the outlet pipe section for left tube bank
304
.
FIGS. 7-10
show the details of one embodiment of the assembly of ladders
52
. Each ladder
52
has a pair of vertical support columns
400
that are laterally spaced apart, and a plurality of transverse crosspieces
402
that span the support columns
400
and have a saddle
404
for supporting the horizontal pipe sections
36
. A crosspiece
402
is generally provided for each pipe section
36
to be supported. The crosspieces
402
are evenly spaced vertically to maintain each pipe section
36
in the appropriate vertical spacing. Opposing support members
406
A,
406
B are mounted on each column
400
at the same height and have a generally horizontal upper engagement surface
412
. The transverse crosspieces
402
have opposite ends
410
A,
410
B supported on the upper engagement surface
412
of the members
406
A,
406
B, each end
410
A,
410
B having a generally horizontal lower engagement surface
414
supported on the upper engagement surface
412
. This allows for any horizontal, upward or angled movement of the transverse crosspiece
402
with respect to the support members
406
A,
406
B due to thermal expansion of the crosspieces
402
, or lateral, front-to-back and/or vertical shifting of the vertical support columns
400
with respect to each other.
The support members
406
A,
406
B preferably have a horizontal projection
416
with a vertical slot
418
(see
FIG. 8
) formed therein. The crosspieces
402
preferably have a generally horizontally projecting lateral member
420
with a fin
422
depending therefrom. The fin
422
is loosely received in the slot
418
to limit lateral movement of the crosspiece
402
. End-to-end movement of the crosspiece
402
is limited by opposing stops between which the crosspiece
402
is loosely received. For example, each stop can include a vertical surface
424
of the vertical columns
400
positioned to engage the end of the crosspiece
402
, an end
426
of the slot
418
positioned to engage an outer end
428
of the fin
422
, or a combination of these. The lateral member
420
and the fin
422
are preferably generally continuous from one end of the crosspiece
402
to the other to strengthen the crosspiece
402
and provide an upper surface for supporting the horizontal pipe section
36
. The crosspieces
402
can be made from an alloy by casting into the desired shape.
The support columns
400
are made from a generally vertical steel alloy I-beam and have a lower base
430
bolted to the floor
20
of the furnace
10
. A similar base
432
at the upper end bolts to the arch
22
of the furnace
10
. A plurality of elongated cross-ties
434
are attached at either end thereof to mounts
436
projecting from each vertical column
400
to maintain the columns
400
in horizontally spaced-apart relation. The cross-ties
434
are placed between every fourth or fifth crosspiece
402
, for example, or can be used more or less frequently as they are needed or desired. The cross-ties
434
are secured by a relatively loose pin-and-slot connection
438
that allows for limited relative movement of the cross-ties
434
with respect to the columns
400
as might be experienced by thermal expansion.
Where upper and lower coils
16
,
18
are used, for example, separate upper and lower columns
400
A and
400
B can similarly be used to facilitate the modularity of the furnace
10
, as discussed above. The upper column
400
A is supported from the arch
22
by bolting at the base
432
, while the lower column
400
B is mounted on the floor
20
by bolting at the base
430
, as mentioned above. The lower end of the upper column
400
A is slideably interengaged with the upper end of the lower column
400
B to allow for relative differential upward and downward movement of the columns due to thermal expansion. This is effected, for example, by means of respective end plates
440
A and
440
B, which are wider than the cross-section of columns
400
, and a plurality guide pins
442
, which are received through guide holes
444
formed in either or both of the end plates
440
A,
440
B and laterally spaced from the footprint of the columns
400
.
With reference to
FIGS. 11-14
, there is shown an alternate embodiment of the ladders
52
which are similar in design and construction as the ladders
52
shown in the embodiment of
FIGS. 7-10
, except that the vertical columns
500
A,
500
B have a generally tubular construction to allow a cooling fluid such as air to be circulated therethrough. This allows the columns
500
A,
500
B to be kept at a relatively lower temperature with the potential for extending the useful life thereof. The support columns
500
A,
500
B can be provided with a layer of insulation
546
, if desired, for additional thermal protection of the columns
500
A,
500
B. Relatively cool air can be drafted into the lower end of the column
500
B by providing one or more apertures
548
, which extend through the base plate
530
and the floor
20
of the furnace
10
. Air which is heated and rises through the columns
500
A,
500
B is vented at the top of the column
500
A through similar apertures
550
formed through base plate
532
and the arch
22
of the furnace
10
. Expandable flexible boots
552
extending from above the end plate
540
A at the upper end of the lower column
500
A to below the end plate
540
B at the lower end of the upper column
500
B provide a passage for drafting air from the top of column
500
B into the bottom of column
500
A. If desired, the air can also be forced or induced, either continuously or intermittently, through the columns
500
A,
500
B by fans (not shown) if sufficient air Flow is not achieved by drafting.
The horizontal helical coils of the present invention can be used in multiple sets arranged vertically or side-by-side within the furnace to obtain more passes within a single firebox. This greatly increases the amount of heat transfer that can be obtained with a given plot size or footprint. For example, the particular four-box
600
furnace with a central stack
602
using the design of U.S. Pat. No. 5,078,857 to Melton has the 62′0″ by 58′8″ (18.9 m by 17.9 m) footprint as illustrated in
FIG. 15
, and uses
80
burners. By using the present design, a furnace with the same design capacity as that of
FIG. 15
has a single firebox with a footprint measuring just 13′0″ by 60′0″ (4 m by 18.3 m) as shown in
FIG. 16
, and only 36 burners are required, three rows of twelve each. The reduction in the number of burners similarly reduces the number of dampers, air and fuel supply lines, valves and controls, and simplifies the operation of the furnace.
The horizontal-helical coil arrangement with the internally disposed wide sweep return bends provides increased effective tube surface area because some heat transfer is effected in the wide sweep return bends. In contrast, the return bends of the prior art furnaces are typically placed outside the firebox so no heat transfer occurs (other than cooling if the bends are not adequately insulated). Also, the wide sweep return bends present less tube-side pressure drop than the short- or long-radius returns used in the prior art. Since the wide sweep return bends of the present furnace design are, unlike the prior art return bends used in delayed coker heaters, placed within the furnace firebox, as mentioned, they also eliminate the conventional insulated end tube supports, closure plates and/or header boxes. Access to the wide sweep return bends in the present invention is instead provided through removable end wall panels. The end wall panels can also accommodate complete coil removal with the tube supports.
In the present design, multiple burner rows are arranged alternately with the horizontal tube rows. This results in a more uniform heating arrangement so that hot and cold spots on the tube walls are minimized. This arrangement has the flexibility to be expanded to include multiple sets of radiant coils disposed side-by-side within the same firebox, further reducing the number of burners required and the amount of firebox wall which is needed per length of tubing.
In the present design, the radiant coil support is provided using multiple intermediate ladder-type supports. This offers design flexibility for either bottom-supported or top-hung configurations. The multi-piece ladder design also allows the use of high alloy cast materials that have better long-term durability in furnace conditions. The ladder design facilitates both the initial furnace assembly as well as periodic long-term maintenance.
EXAMPLE
A design of the furnace according to the present invention shown in
FIG. 16
is compared to the prior art Melton design of FIG.
15
. The two furnaces are each designed for delayed coker preheat service for processing 27,500 BPD of feedstock with a radiant section heating duty of 76.7 MMBtu/hr. The
FIG. 15
prior art furnace design requires four fireboxes with one pass each, with burners located on either side of the tube bank, whereas the present design of
FIG. 16
can use just one firebox with four nested passes. The design characteristics are presented in Table 1 below:
TABLE 1
|
|
Furnace Radiant Section Design Comparison
|
Feature/Characteristic
Melton Design
Present Design
|
|
Capacity (BPD)
27,500
27,500
|
Tube OD (inches)
4.5
4.5
|
Tube ID (inches)
3.791
3.791
|
Tube vertical spacing, center-
8.0
8.0
|
to-center (inches)
|
Straight tube length (feet)
|
Heated length
61
53
(56@inlet&outlet)
|
Total length
63
53
|
Bend length (feet)
|
Heat transfer surface
0.0
8.13
|
Equiv., pressure drop
11.1
12.0
|
Number of total passes
4
4
|
Number of tubes, total
72
72
|
Number of cells
4
1
|
Tube banks per cell
1
2
|
Tube bank height (feet)
12
24
|
|
It is seen from the data in Table 1 that the four fireboxes used to heat the coker feedstock in the prior art design of
FIG. 15
can be replaced with just one firebox in the present design of FIG.
16
. While the same number of tubes are used, the present design uses shorter straight pipe sections because heat transfer is also obtained in the return bends which are located within the firebox, whereas the prior art short radius return bends are located outside the fireboxes. While the tubing costs for the two designs are about the same, the firebox cost is about half that of the prior art design. The flow characteristics, pressure drop and pump power and costs are presented in Table 2:
TABLE 2
|
|
Furnace Radiant Design Comparison-Fluid Flow
|
Feature/Characteristic
Melton Design
Present Design
|
|
Pressure drop (psi)
158
140
|
Equivalent length of tubing
1320
1164
|
(feet)
|
Pump head (feet)
208.4
189.7
|
Pump power (hp)
198
180
|
Annual pump cost (85%
$61,200
$55,700
|
efficiency, U.S. $0.03/kwh)
|
|
It is seen from the data in Table 2 that the pressure drop and pumping cost of the present furnace design are lower than the prior art design, primarily because there is reduced pressure drop through the sweep return bends in the present design relative to the radius returns of the prior art delayed coker charge heaters. The heat transfer and burner layout are presented in Table 3:
TABLE 3
|
|
Furnace Radiant Design Comparison - Heat Transfer
|
Feature/Characteristic
Melton Design
Present Design
|
|
Total/surface area (ft
2
)
5174
5175
|
Average flux (Btu/ft
2−
h)
14,828
14,826
|
Peak flux (Btu/ft
2−
h)
17,794
17,791
|
Number of burners
80
36
|
Burners per row
10
12
|
Burner rows per cell
2
3
|
Burner duty (MMBtu/h)
|
Side/wall burners
1.79
3.5
|
Middle burners
N/A
5.0
|
|
From the data in Table 3, it is seen that the present furnace design is greatly simplified because only 36 burners are used, compared to the 80 of the comparable prior art Melton furnace, while at the same time average and peak heat flux are about the same. Considering that an air damper and a fuel valve must be used for each burner, along with associated piping and controls, this greatly simplifies the furnace.
While the coil, furnace and tube support design are described above with reference to delayed coking unit charge heaters, it is understood that the designs are like wise applicable to visbreakers, crude heaters, hot oil heaters, vacuum unit heaters and other refinery process furnaces.
Claims
- 1. A radiant coil for a refinery process furnace, comprising:an inlet pipe section; an outlet pipe section; a plurality of essentially straight horizontal pipe sections arranged in at least two vertical banks, wherein the vertical banks are parallel and horizontally spaced apart a sufficient distance to facilitate placement of evenly spaced rows of burners between the vertical banks; a plurality of bent pipe sweep return bends arranged in vertical banks at either end of the straight pipe banks, each bend connecting a pair of straight pipe sections in adjacent vertical banks thereof, wherein the return bends are sloped between horizontal and vertical and one of the straight pipe sections in the connected pair thereof is elevated with respect to the other; and a tubeside fluid flow path from the inlet pipe section through an alternating series of the straight pipe sections and the return bends to the outlet pipe section.
- 2. The coil of claim 1 comprising first and second vertical straight pipe banks and opposing return bend banks, wherein the straight pipe sections and the return bends are evenly spaced from adjacent sections and bends above and below except for uppermost and lowermost pipe sections and return bends.
- 3. The coil of claim 2 wherein the return bends at either end of the adjacent tube banks are oppositely sloped so as to provide a generally horizontal-helical flow pattern.
- 4. A radiant coil for a refinery process furnace, comprising:an inlet pipe section: an outlet pipe section; a plurality of essentially straight horizontal pipe sections arranged in at least two vertical banks, wherein the vertical banks are parallel and horizontally spaced apart; a plurality of bent pipe sweep return bends arranged in vertical banks at either end of the straight pipe banks, each bend connecting a pair of straight pipe sections in adjacent vertical banks thereof, wherein the return bends are sloped between horizontal and vertical and one of the straight pipe sections in the connected pair thereof is elevated with respect to the other, wherein the return bends at either end of the adjacent tube banks are oppositely sloped so as to provide a generally horizontal-helical flow pattern; a tubeside fluid flow path from the inlet pipe section through an alternating series of the straight pipe sections and the return bends to the outlet pipe section; first and second vertical straight pipe banks and opposing return bend banks, wherein the straight pipe sections and the return bends are evenly spaced from adjacent sections and bends above and below except for uppermost and lowermost pipe sections and return bends; first and second nested passes wherein the fluid flow paths of the first and second passes each comprise a series of alternating straight pipe sections in each of said vertical banks thereof wherein the straight pipe sections of the first pass in the first and second banks are horizontally spaced opposite the straight pipe sections of the second pass in the respective second and first banks.
- 5. The coil of claim 4 wherein the first and second pass straight pipe sections in each vertical tube bank are alternated every other one from top to bottom.
- 6. The coil of claim 4 further comprising nested third and fourth passes wherein the fluid flow paths of the third and fourth passes each comprise a series of alternating straight pipe sections in each of said vertical banks thereof wherein the straight pipe sections of the third pass in the first and second banks are horizontally spaced opposite the straight pipe sections of the fourth pass in the respective second and first banks.
- 7. The coil of claim 6 wherein the first, second, third and fourth pass straight pipe sections in each vertical tube bank are alternated every fourth one from top to bottom.
- 8. The coil of claim 6 further comprising nested fifth and sixth passes wherein the fluid flow paths of the fifth and sixth passes each comprise a series of alternating straight pipe sections in each of said vertical banks thereof wherein the straight pipe sections of the fifth pass in the first and second banks are horizontally spaced opposite the straight pipe sections of the sixth pass in the respective second and first banks.
- 9. The coil of claim 8 wherein the first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth pass straight pipe sections in each vertical tube bank are alternated every sixth one from top to bottom.
- 10. A refinery process furnace, comprising:a firebox having a floor, opposing vertical sidewalls, and opposing vertical end walls; the coil of any one of claims 1, 3, 5, 7 or 9 disposed with the straight pipe banks and the return bend banks within the firebox wherein endmost vertical straight pipe banks are evenly spaced from and generally parallel to the vertical side walls, each of the return bend banks are evenly spaced from the end walls, and the inlet and outlet sections are disposed for introducing a relatively cold fluid into the flow paths and discharging a heated fluid therefrom, respectively; multiple rows of floor mounted burners arranged alternately and evenly spaced in plan with respect to the vertical straight pipe banks.
- 11. The refinery process furnace of claim 10 comprising a plurality of said coils arranged in a vertical stack with an uppermost coil and one or more lower coils beneath the upper coil, wherein the straight pipe banks and return bend banks in the said plurality of coils are aligned in plan.
- 12. A refinery process furnace, comprising:a firebox; at least one multiple-pass, double-row, helical-horizontal radiant coil, with nested tube-side flow paths, disposed completely within the firebox except for inlet and outlet piping at ends of passes thereof which can optionally pass through a wall of the firebox or connect to another coil within the firebox; three rows of floor-fired burners, one disposed between the rows of the coil and the other two disposed on either side of the rows of the coil and evenly spaced therefrom in plan.
- 13. The refinery process furnace of claim 12 wherein the firebox is elongated with opposite ends provided with removable panels for removing and replacing the coil.
- 14. The refinery process furnace of claim 12 wherein straight horizontal pipe sections of the coil rows are supported by one or more spaced-apart ladders, wherein the ladder or ladders comprise:first and second vertical columns; a plurality of elongated spacer elements attached at either end thereof to the vertical columns to maintain the columns in horizontally spaced-apart relation; opposing support members vertically spaced along the vertical columns, wherein the support members have a generally horizontal upper engagement surface; transverse crosspieces having opposite ends engaged by the support members, each end having a generally horizontal lower engagement surface supported on the upper engagement surface allowing for any horizontal, upward or angled movement of the transverse crosspiece with respect to the support members due to thermal expansion thereof or shifting of the vertical columns with respect to each other; a cradle formed in the crosspieces for supporting the horizontal pipe section thereon.
- 15. The furnace of claim 14 wherein the vertical columns are supported at a lower end thereof from a floor of the firebox.
- 16. The furnace of claim 14 wherein the vertical columns are supported from an upper end thereof on an arch of the firebox.
- 17. The furnace of claim 14 wherein the vertical columns have an upper section having an upper end thereof supported from an arch of the firebox, and a lower section having a lower end thereof supported from a floor of the firebox, wherein an upper end of the lower section is slideably engaged with a lower end of the upper section to provide a continuous vertical column from the floor to the arch.
- 18. The furnace of claim 14 wherein the vertical columns comprise I-beams.
- 19. The furnace of claim 14 wherein the vertical columns comprise rectangular tubular members.
- 20. The furnace of claim 19 wherein the columns are cooled by circulating air through the tubular members.
- 21. The furnace of claim 20 wherein the air is circulated by drafting through the tubular members.
- 22. The furnace of claim 14 wherein the support members comprise a horizontal projection with a vertical slot formed therein and the crosspieces comprise a generally horizontally projecting lateral member with a fin depending therefrom, wherein the fin is loosely received in the slot to limit lateral movement of the crosspiece, and wherein end-to-end movement of the crosspiece is limited by opposing stops between which the crosspiece is loosely received.
- 23. The furnace of claim 22 wherein the stops comprise a vertical surface of the vertical columns positioned to engage the end of the crosspiece.
- 24. The furnace of claim 22 wherein the stops comprise an end of the slot positioned to engage an outer end of the fin.
- 25. The furnace of claim 22 wherein the lateral member and the fin are generally continuous from one end of the crosspiece to the other.
US Referenced Citations (6)