The present invention is directed to reflective objectives.
A typical visual inspection system may be similar in function to a microscope, but may have more demanding requirements on its imaging properties. For instance, a visual inspection system may require a particular degree of uniformity, so that a particular feature on the object appears the same, regardless of its location in the field of view. Many of these demanding requirements for the system become, in turn, demanding requirements for the objective, which is the optical component closest to the object.
In many cases, a typical all-refractive objective that is suitable for a microscope may have shortcomings if used in a visual inspection system. Five of these possible shortcomings are listed below:
(1) The Objective may be non-telecentric.
Telecentricity, which is highly desirable in a visual inspection system, may be described by the following condition: A central ray (meaning a ray passing through the center of the pupil) at the edge of the field of view emerges parallel to a central ray at the center of the field of view. In other words, in a telecentric inspection system, the cone of illuminating rays strikes the object with the same orientation, for all locations within the field of view. Note that telecentricity may be less important for a microscope system, in which the object of interest may be manually moved into the center of the field of view.
For an infinity-corrected system (meaning one where the objective may be illuminated with nominally collimated incident light, the object is located nominally at the front focal plane of the objective, and the light returning from the objective is nominally collimated), telecentricity may be achieved if the aperture stop of the objective is located at the rear focal plane of the objective.
For the majority of off-the-shelf, refractive microscope objectives, the aperture stop is an opaque disk with a circular hole in its center, and is located fairly close to the threaded portion of the objective. In most cases, the aperture stop is the outermost element in the objective, and is easily seen through the threaded portion of the objective barrel. This location near the threads seldom corresponds to the rear focal plane of the objective, and seldom leads to a telecentric objective.
(2) The objective may be prone to “ghosts”.
These ghosts can arise from faint reflections off the multiple air-glass interfaces inside a typical microscope objective. There may be ghost images, where a bright spot in the image may produce a ghost bright spot elsewhere in the field of view. In addition, there may be ghost pupils, where the illumination pattern itself may be superimposed onto a portion of the image; for common bright-field illumination, a ghost pupil can appear as a bright circle concentric with the center of the image. These ghost pupils are more common with low magnification (or, equivalently, long focal length) objectives.
(3) The objective may have less than ideal image quality.
For instance, the objective may have residual aberrations than can degrade the image quality, such as chromatic aberration, or longitudinal chromatic aberration, which may be especially prevalent at low magnifications (or, equivalently, long focal lengths). There may be residual field curvature, which can degrade the edges of the field of view differently than the center of the field of view; this is especially undesirable in an inspection system that requires uniformity over the entire field of view. In addition, there may also be vignetting, which is an undesirable truncation of rays at a surface other than the aperture stop, which can also lead to nonuniformities over the field of view.
(4) The objective may have a wavelength-dependent bias.
A typical all-refractive objective may have anti-reflection coatings on its refractive surfaces, which are designed to reduce reflections at a particular wavelength, or over a particular wavelength range. These anti-reflection coatings may have non-uniformities outside the wavelength range or, depending on the complexity of the coatings and the curvatures of the refractive surfaces, may even produce wavelength-dependent artifacts at the edge of the field of view. These non-uniformities are all undesirable for a visual inspection system.
(5) The objective may be part of a matched set, where performance and cost vary from objective-to-objective, depending on magnification (or, equivalently, focal length).
Matched sets of microscope objectives can often be purchased, with each objective having a different magnification (or, equivalently, focal length). Each objective can be screwed into a turret that allows for selection of one of the objectives. The mechanical constraints of the turret often require that the parfocal distance (meaning the distance between the objective shoulder and the object) be the same for all objectives in the set. A rotation of the turret slides one objective out of the optical path and another into the optical path, typically with only a minimal fine adjustment of focus. This allows for a relatively simple change in magnification without significant adjustment of the microscope.
Maintaining a constant parfocal distance for an entire matched set of refractive objectives can be challenging. For instance, some focal lengths may have a relatively straightforward design, while other focal lengths in the matched set may require more refractive elements than the straightforward objective, which can increase the complexity and cost, and may even reduce the performance if it requires more anti-reflection coatings, or more severe aberration correction.
For instance, consider the following exemplary matched set of all-refractive objectives, in which the focal length of a 5× objective is relatively straightforward. For this example, both the 2× and the 10× objective may perform more poorly than the 5×, with respect to the above four shortcomings. The 2× and 10× may also cost more than the 5×. Furthermore, the 1× and 20× may perform even more poorly than the 2× and 10×, and may cost even more than the 2× and the 10×. These are merely examples intended to show that there may be undesirable variations from objective-to-objective in a matched set, and are not intended to be limiting in any way.
Accordingly, it would be beneficial to provide an objective that can overcome one or more of these possible shortcomings.
An embodiment is an optical apparatus having a rear focal plane and a front focal plane, comprising an off-axis reflector; and a compound reflector for reflecting light from an aperture stop to the off-axis reflector, and for reflecting light from the off-axis reflector to an object plane largely parallel to the aperture stop.
A further embodiment is an optical apparatus, comprising an optical path from an aperture stop to an object plane largely parallel to the aperture stop; and a concave reflector having a rear focal plane generally coincident with the aperture stop, and a front focal plane generally coincident with the object plane. The optical path has a first off-axis reflection between the aperture stop and the concave reflector, and has a second off-axis reflection between the concave reflector and the object plane.
A further embodiment is an optical apparatus, comprising a first objective, comprising a first off-axis reflector; and a first compound reflector for reflecting light from a first aperture stop to the first off-axis reflector, and for reflecting light from the first off-axis reflector to an object plane largely parallel to the aperture stop; and a second objective, comprising a second off-axis reflector different from the first off-axis reflector; and a second compound reflector for reflecting light from a second aperture stop to the second off-axis reflector, and for reflecting light from the second off-axis reflector to the object plane. The first and second objectives are selectable.
A further embodiment is an optical apparatus, comprising a body having a threaded portion concentric with a principal optical axis; and a compound reflector rotatably mounted to the body for diverting a beam from the principal optical axis and back to the principal optical axis. The compound reflector is azimuthally adjustable with respect to the threaded portion.
A further embodiment is an optical apparatus for use in inspecting an object at an object plane, comprising a rear focal plane; a rear optical axis normal to the rear focal plane; a front plane; a front optical axis normal to the front plane; a first reflector disposed along at least one of the rear and front optical axes primarily for providing off-axis light from at least one of the rear and front optical axes; and a second reflector primarily for establishing the rear focal plane and the front plane and disposed for receiving off-axis light from the first reflector. The rear focal plane is generally coincident with an aperture stop, and the front plane is generally coincident with the object plane.
In the following detailed description of the invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. In the drawings, like numerals describe substantially similar components throughout the several views. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. Other embodiments may be utilized and structural, logical, and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
The potential shortcomings of an all-refractive objective can include any or all of non-telecentricity, ghost images and/or ghost pupils, aberrations and/or vignetting, non-uniformities with respect to wavelength, and/or variations in performance from objective-to-objective in a matched set of objectives.
One or more of these potential shortcomings may be overcome by a reflective objective, summarized in non-limiting generalities as follows. Essentially all the optical power in the objective is in a single, off-axis, concave mirror, which is oriented generally perpendicular to the central axis of the objective. An incident beam is directed to and from the concave mirror by a pair of flat mirrors, so that a central on-axis ray in the incident beam is collinear with the corresponding thrice-reflected ray at the object. The object is one focal length away from the concave mirror. The aperture stop is also one focal length away from the concave mirror, leading to a condition of telecentricity at the object. Different focal lengths for the objectives may be realized by using mirrors with different curvatures, located at different distances away from the central axis of the objective. The reflective objective can optionally be retrofitted into a turret typically used for microscope objectives, and can optionally have refractive elements, making the objective catadioptric. The above description is merely an informal summary, and is not to be construed as limiting in any way.
Note that the following discussion assumes that the objective is illuminated by a source, that the source illumination is brought to a focus on or near the object, and that the light reflected from the object returns through the objective and is collected. Alternatively, the object may be illuminated from beneath, so that light transmitted through the object passes through the objective and is collected. As a further alternative, the object itself may be luminescent or fluorescent, and may emit its own light to be collected by the objective. In general, the light path through the objective is reversible, so that a light path from the aperture stop to the object is equivalent to a light path from the object to the aperture stop.
In addition, the terms “rear” and “front” are used below to refer to the focal planes of the objective, with the front focal plane facing the object, and the rear focal plane facing the illumination and detection optics. These terms are used merely for convenience, and are not intended to be limiting in any way. For instance, light may propagate from the rear side to the front side, or, equally well, from the front side to the rear side. Alternatively, the terms “rear” and “front” may be reversed.
The light in
As drawn in
Alternatively, the objective 10 may operate at finite conjugates, meaning that the incident and returning beams may be non-collimated. At finite conjugates, the objective is illuminated with diverging or converging light. The illumination comes to a focus at a front plane; note that if the illumination is collimated, then the front plane coincides with the front focal plane. The object is located generally at the front plane. For telecentricity, the aperture stop may still be located at the rear focal plane of the objective.
An incident beam enters the objective 10 through the aperture stop 12. The aperture stop may be an opaque screen made of metal or plastic, with a suitable opening for the pupil of the objective. Typically, for bright field illumination and bright field collection, the aperture stop 12 may be an opaque annulus with a transparent center, or, more simply, a round hole. For other illumination or collection schemes, a suitably shaped aperture stop 12 may be used. The size of the aperture stop 12 may be of interest when designing the illumination optics, which typically supply generally uniform illumination to the full spatial extent of aperture stop 12, with a prescribed angular extent. The center of the aperture stop 12 is denoted by element 21. An on-axis ray passing through the center 21 of the aperture stop 12 determines a “central axis” for the objective 10, which extends generally perpendicular to the aperture stop 12, from the aperture stop 12 to the object 18.
The beam reflects off a mirror 13 and is directed generally laterally away from the central axis of the objective. The mirror 13 may be a side of a compound reflector, or may optionally be a stand-alone element. For example, as drawn in
The beam then strikes a concave mirror 17. As drawn in
The rear surface 16 may additionally have an aspheric and/or conic component that may reduce spherical aberration at the object 18. The optional aspheric and/or conic component may be realized in the reflective surface description as a non-zero conic constant and/or one or more non-zero even aspheric coefficients. For instance, if the reflective surface is a parabola, then one way to mathematically describe the surface is with a conic constant of −1 and all the even aspheric coefficients equal to zero; its radius of curvature is typically set equal to twice the desired focal length of the objective.
The required clear aperture of the rear surface 16 may be greater than or equal to the diameter of the aperture stop 12 plus half of the full field of view at the object 18. This value may increase slightly for larger off-axis reflection angles from the mirror 17.
After reflecting from the concave mirror 17, the beam reflects off a mirror 14 and is directed toward the object 18. The mirror 14 may be similar in construction to mirror 13, and may be either integrated with mirror 13 as adjacent sides of a prism 15, or may be a separate element from mirror 13. The reflective coating of mirror 14 may be similar to that used on mirror 13, although any suitable coating may be used.
Note that the prism 15 may be referred to as a compound reflector. A compound reflector, as used in this document, is intended to mean a component that has two or more reflective sides. A prism may therefore be a compound reflector. A prism, on which the reflections are internal, rather than external as shown in
Note that the on-axis central ray 11, which passes through the center 21 of the aperture stop, is generally collinear both before and after the three reflections shown in
Note that the object 18 need not be parallel to the aperture stop 12, but may be inclined by several degrees or more in any direction. A tilted object plane can remain in focus throughout if the corresponding image plane is also tilted; the appropriate tilt orientations and angles are related by the so-called Scheimpflug condition. For the purposes of this document, a statement that the object plane is largely parallel to the aperture stop shall mean that the object plane may be inclined by a few degrees or more, according to the so-called Scheimpflug condition, and that a camera or viewing screen located at the image plane may also be inclined according to the so-called Scheimpflug condition so that the tilted object plane remains in focus throughout on the tilted image plane.
The objective 10 is said to have an azimuthal orientation, where its azimuthal angle is defined as the angle between the on-axis central ray 11 and the preferred polarization axis 22; in
Note that in
An addition to the optical path, compared with the geometry of
The aperture stop 32, mirror 37 with highly reflective surface 38, and object 39 may be similar in size, function and construction to analogous components in
There is one small difference between the mirror 37 and the mirror 17. If the objectives 10 and 30 have comparable focal lengths and parfocal distances, then the angle at which the central on-axis ray strikes the mirror is slightly larger for the geometry of
For comparison,
The interchangeable units may be sold or packaged as a matched set, in a similar manner to refractive objectives. Unlike matched all-refractive objectives, which can show a deterioration in performance and/or an increase in cost as the focal length departs significantly from half the parfocal distance, the performance and/or cost of the reflective objectives may be essentially the same across all in the set. The major difference across the set of reflective objectives are (1) a different mirror curvature, (2) a different path length, and (3) a different wedge angle. None of these three differences significantly affects performance and/or cost, compared with the equivalent all-refractive objective that may require adding or removing glass elements to achieve a desired performance and/or cost.
In addition, the symmetry of the geometry of
For the geometry of
In contrast to the geometry of
The actual selecting of one arm versus another may be accomplished by many methods. Two exemplary methods are described in the following paragraphs.
In one method, the compound reflector may be fixed in one particular azimuthal orientation that directs the beam to a first arm, and may be swapped out for another compound reflector having a different azimuthal orientation that directs the beam to another arm. Alternatively, the compound reflector may have multiple reflecting sections, with reflecting angles that may or may not vary with azimuthal position; such a compound reflector could be rotated to another section, or electrically or mechanically altered to vary the arm selection.
Any number of mechanical structures may be used to swap one compound reflector for another. In particular, one exemplary structure may be a turret, such as those typically used for refractive microscope objectives. Each location in the turret may be used to direct the beam down a different arm, with each arm having a different focal length. Optionally, the turret may even mix reflective objectives, such as those in
Note that if each compound reflector corresponds only to a single arm, then the geometry of
The preferred polarization axis 61 is determined by components in the inspection system that are external to the objective 60; the axis itself is shown in
In a second method, the compound reflector (not shown in
This pivoting of the compound reflector about the central axis of the objective may be accomplished by a holder 70, as shown in
Once the threaded portion 71 and shoulder 72 are screwed firmly into the turret, a rotating portion 73 can rotate about the central axis of the objective, independent of the threaded portion 71 or the shoulder 72. The compound reflector 74 is rigidly attached to the rotating portion 73, so it, too, can rotate about the central axis of the objective, independent of the threaded portion 71 or the shoulder 72. As the compound reflector 74 rotates, the azimuthal angle of the beam changes, so that a rotation may direct the beams 77 and 78 from one arm, such as the upper arm in
In the reflective objective, the aperture stop may be located in the interior of the threaded portion 71, as is typically done with refractive microscope objectives. In this manner, the pupil locations remain essentially unchanged when switching from refractive to reflective objectives. Alternatively, the aperture stop may be located at any other suitable location in the objective, such as the interior of the shoulder. Optimally, the objective is telecentric if the aperture stop is located at the rear focal plane of the curved mirror.
Although two arms are shown in
Although the objectives of
Although specific embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement that is calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. Many adaptations of the invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Accordingly, this application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the invention. It is manifestly intended that this invention be limited only by the following claims and equivalents thereof.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/411,217, filed on Apr. 25, 2006, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11411217 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 13032428 | US |