The present disclosure relates to solar cells and, more particularly, to tandem solar cells.
This section provides a general summary of the disclosure, and is not a comprehensive disclosure of its full scope or all of its features.
According to the principles of the present teachings, a solar cell is provided having broad-band, efficient absorption of sunlight accomplished by means of combining sub-cells which are individually absorbing over a narrower, but complementary spectral bands. There may be multiple sub-cells having overlapping absorption spectra. The sub-cells may also be coated with optical filters/reflectors having transmission and reflection characteristics correlated with the absorption bands of the sub-cells. The sub-cells are distributed in 3-dimensional space.
Spectral selection for each sub-sub-cell can be accomplished by some common wavelength selection means. These means can include, for example, use of an optical microcavity based on the electrode-semiconductor-electrode stack, or a distributed Bragg reflector coating the sub-subcell, a 2- or 3-dimensional photonic crystal, or a combination of these.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. The description and specific examples in this summary are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The drawings described herein are for illustrative purposes only of selected embodiments and not all possible implementations, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
a)-(d) depict 2-dimensional coordinates for well-performing fiber-OPV bundles for 1, 2, 3, and 10-row systems. The coordinates are given in terms of fiber diameters.
a is a schematic perspective view of a solar cell system having rigid cells and modules according to the principles of the present teachings.
b is a top view of the solar cell system of
c is a side view of the solar cell system of
Corresponding reference numerals indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
Example embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings. Example embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough, and will fully convey the scope to those who are skilled in the art. Numerous specific details are set forth such as examples of specific components, devices, and methods, to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the present disclosure. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that specific details need not be employed, that example embodiments may be embodied in many different forms and that neither should be construed to limit the scope of the disclosure.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular example embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” may be intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “including,” and “having,” are inclusive and therefore specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. The method steps, processes, and operations described herein are not to be construed as necessarily requiring their performance in the particular order discussed or illustrated, unless specifically identified as an order of performance. It is also to be understood that additional or alternative steps may be employed.
Spatially relative terms, such as “inner,” “outer,” “beneath”, “below”, “lower”, “above”, “upper” and the like, may be used herein for ease of description to describe one element or feature's relationship to another element(s) or feature(s) as illustrated in the figures. Spatially relative terms may be intended to encompass different orientations of the device in use or operation in addition to the orientation depicted in the figures. For example, if the device in the figures is turned over, elements described as “below” or “beneath” other elements or features would then be oriented “above” the other elements or features. Thus, the example term “below” can encompass both an orientation of above and below. The device may be otherwise oriented (rotated 90 degrees or at other orientations) and the spatially relative descriptors used herein interpreted accordingly.
One way to improve photovoltaic power conversion efficiency in an attempt to approach and supersede the Shockley-Queisser limit is to employ several solar cells in tandem, with different bandgaps covering complementary parts of the solar spectrum, reducing thermalization losses and increasing the cell voltage. Organic tandem solar cells have been considered in two main configurations (shown schematically in
Alternatively, as seen in
A novel tandem solar cell architecture 10 according to the principles of the present teachings is provided, illustrated schematically in
The present teachings are organized as follows. First, we discuss general considerations for designing a volumetrically-distributed, internally-dispersive tandem solar cell using color-tuned fiber sub-cells. Then, we discuss the simulation framework used for modeling and optimizing the performance of individual solar cells, followed by a discussion of the array optimization. Using this framework, we first consider the performance of an array comprised of fibers, which all have identical cell structure optimized for absorption efficiency. To demonstrate the advantage of the tandem solar cell concept, we then consider the performance of an array comprised of color-tuned fibers, which incorporate narrow-band dielectric filters/reflectors, showing that the architecture can lead to high overall power conversion efficiency.
Several variants of fiber based PV cells have been demonstrated, particularly those using organic semiconductors deposited on non-planar substrates. Here, as seen in
The motivation for using a metal-organic-metal layer structure instead of a traditional configuration employing ITO is two-fold: a) eliminating ITO potentially improves manufacturability, reliability, and cost-effectiveness; and b) it allows for a stronger optical microcavity that can be tuned to efficiently absorb light over a narrower part of the spectrum.
The individual OPV cells 20 considered here (
The design and analysis of the fiber OPV cells 20 is studied using optoelectronic models presented and validated in detail elsewhere. Briefly, the model allows us to quantify the optical field intensity distribution throughout the OPV cell using the transfer matrix approach. From the optical field intensity distribution the exciton generation rate is calculated, followed by numerically solving an exciton diffusion equation to determine the external quantum efficiency (ηEQE). The boundary conditions for the diffusion equation are: 1) complete exciton dissociation at the boundary between the electron donor and acceptor layers (here, the absorber and front side optical spacer), and 2) zero exciton diffusion at the opposing boundary (i.e. absorber/back side optical spacer). Following exciton dissociation, 100% charge collection efficiency at the electrodes is assumed. A qualitative view of a flat-band energy level structure for this cell configuration is given in
To model the OPV cell on a fiber substrate, we consider it to be a collection of vanishingly small planar cells tangentially distributed along the circumference of the fiber, each having light rays incident at an arbitrary angle through a 180-degree range. This approach has been used to accurately model organic solar cells in many studies, including those that consider the dependence on illumination angle. Other key parameters of OPV cell performance include the fill factor (FF), and open circuit voltage (VOC). The VOC of each cell is set to be 0.4 V less than the potential given by the optical bandgap (roughly the HOMO-LUMO gap) of the absorbing material. The FF is assumed to be 0.7, a value that is observed in high performance OPV cells.
To evaluate multi-fiber OPV systems, such as those of the present teachings, the cell model embodying an individual fiber OPV cell is combined with numerical ray-tracing. A multi-fiber unit cell is first constructed in which each fiber is assumed to be infinitely long. The location of each fiber within the unit cell is specified, and periodic boundary conditions are applied in the direction normal to the fiber axis, such that the array extends “horizontally”. A line emitter, defined above the fiber system, emits light rays towards the fiber bundle. A retro-reflector (with reflectivity=1) is placed below the fiber bundle. As depicted in
A key aspect of the multi-fiber tandem design of the present teachings is that those incident wavelengths that are not efficiently harvested by a given fiber 20 are efficiently reflected. An appropriately tuned metal-organic-metal cavity reflects a large portion of the off-resonant light. However, due to the large number of reflections experienced by a light ray on average, even a small amount of parasitic absorption in the outer electrode for a single pass can escalate to a substantial loss overall. Therefore, we further improve off-resonant reflectivity by applying dielectric coatings around the OPV fiber 20. A 30-layer dielectric coating is applied to the color-tuned OPV cells with an initial design based on multiple quarter wave stacks of 5-10 layers, forming a band pass filter. Each quarter wave stack gives rise to regions of high reflectivity around its characteristic wavelength; combining several stacks forms regions of high reflectivity for spectral components that are off-resonance with the fiber cell's peak absorption. The initial coating configuration is refined by varying the individual layer thicknesses in an iterative process to maximize both transmission on-resonance and reflectivity off-resonance with the fiber cell's peak absorption. The coatings are applied around the fiber OPV cell on top of a thick transparent coating (greater than 100 nm) that reduces light coherence to minimize parasitic interference effects. The coatings consist of a two alternating materials having refractive index values of nH=2.2 and nL=1.35, values common in optical coating design. For simplicity, the refractive indices of both the thick transparent coating (e.g. barrier) between the outer electrode and the DBR stack, as well as the clear matrix surrounding the coated fibers, are assumed to be the same as air (i.e. n=1). This assumption is made based on the likelihood that the fiber array will be embedded in a clear polymer or glass matrix that has an index nearly identical to that of a typical barrier material (e.g. n=1.4), leading to a conserved diffraction angle. Using n=1 instead also conserves the diffraction angle but simplifies the model. An anti-reflecting coating (ARC) at the surface of the clear matrix holding the fibers will minimize any differences associated with moving away from the n=1 assumption. ARCs on glass have been designed with reflectivity below 1% over the visible spectrum and for a large range of incident angles. In addition, while a host matrix with n=1.4 would require a DBR redesign, this refractive index falls between the values for the DBR coating materials, reducing the optical impedance and improving the coating's performance.
In the next two sections we apply this modeling to multi-fiber OPV cell arrays 10. We first consider the performance of arrays using only one OPV cell structure. The use of multiple spectrally tuned OPV cells are then employed within the fiber matrix to maximize performance across the incident solar spectrum.
To investigate the performance of this design concept we begin by looking at a single OPV cell 20 in a planar configuration, then map its performance onto a single fiber, followed by mapping the performance of a fiber to a row of fibers, and finally consider multiple rows of fibers, illustrated in
Single Fiber Architecture: The performance of an OPV cell with a single absorption layer that absorbs between approximately 500-700 nm is chosen. Over this wavelength range, the power conversion efficiency is maximized by calculating the trade-off between current (limited by the solar photon flux density at each wavelength) and VOC (defined as a constant that depends only on the chosen optical band gap of the absorption layer, minus, nominally, a minimum feasible exciton binding energy). Using the modeling described herein, the planar OPV cell structure resonant with the 500-700 nm band of incident light which maximizes jSC consists of a 10 nm Ag electrode followed by a 52 nm optical spacer, 15 nm absorption layer, 52 nm exciton blocking layer, and finally a 100 nm Ag back contact. For this device, an optical bandpass filter is not applied. Under AM1.5G illumination, the OPV cell is predicted to have a short circuit current, jSC=8.2 mA/cm2. Combining this with a FF=0.7, and a VOC determined to be 1.37 V results in a power conversion efficiency, n=7.86%. Applying this structure to a fiber geometry results in a jSC=7.8 mA/cm2; the reduction in jSC relative to the planar analogue is due to increased reflection at oblique incident angles on the fiber surface, as shown in
Planar Array of Fibers: To capture a portion of the reflected light, the fibers can be placed adjacent to one another, as might be encountered, for example, in a woven textile. A row of adjacent fibers, illustrated in
While a single row of fibers can increase the photocurrent substantially (˜14% over a single fiber OPV cell, and 8.5% over a planar cell), much of the light initially reflected off the fiber surface is not trapped. In appropriately configured multi-row (3-dimensionally distributed) fiber OPV bundles, however, a majority of light rays that enter the fiber matrix bounce between the constituent fibers many times.
Volumetric Array of Fibers: We consider multi-row fiber arrays, varying the depth from 1 to 20 rows. Due to improved packing, performance predicted by ray tracing models was generally best for fibers that were placed in a repeating “slant” arrangement (see
With continued reference to
To increase the efficiency of the multi-fiber OPV system further, a set of spectrally-tuned PV cells are employed in volumetric arrays. The individual OPV cells on fibers retain the same basic structure (i.e. metal-organic-metal), but the thickness of the absorber and other layers are modified to tune the optical microcavity and maximize the photocurrent of an individual fiber device over a specific spectral band. Furthermore, a band-pass optical filter is added (as discussed herein) to efficiently reflect off-resonant wavelengths while remaining transparent for on-resonance wavelengths. These coatings are uniquely designed for each type of spectrally-tuned OPV cell. The fiber arrays incorporate wavelength selective dispersion by virtue of their geometry and the DBR coating, such that incident light is effectively sorted among the sub-cells—a ray of particular wavelength bounces between the constituent fibers until it encounters (and is absorbed by) a complementary tuned fiber OPV cell.
As previously mentioned, in some embodiments, each fiber PV cell can be optimized to have high efficiency over a 200 nm spectral band, with the target spectral band and layer thicknesses of the sub-cells for the range of fiber types provided in Table 1.
The fiber spatial orientation is the same as the single cell designs (given in
The foregoing analysis predicts the array current. To predict the power conversion efficiency, we place the individual fiber cells in electrical series and/or parallel to match current and voltage intensity and thus each fiber in depth will have a unique maximum power point. However, we expect that the fiber with the same relative coordinate in adjacent unit cells will have the same current-voltage output. These cells can be added in parallel to sum the current without voltage losses. As the external wiring runs down the composite, when current is matched between the multi-cell parallel wiring, the circuit can be combined in series to sum voltage without current losses. The open circuit voltage of each 4 sub-cell design is given in
Performance At Different Angles of Illumination: It is also important to consider the performance of these new reflective/inherently dispersive tandem architectures with illumination angle, shown in
Alternative Configurations: It should be appreciated that the principles of the present teachings can be employed in a wide range of configurations, including rigid solar cells and/or modules, such as those illustrated in
To practically implement a multi-row fiber bundle, it is necessary to hold the fibers in place. This can be accomplished by placing the fibers in a transparent plastic or glass host. This will change the optics at the air-host and host-fiber interfaces, but should not modify the overall efficiency substantially. In addition, bus-lines will be required to transport charge efficiently down long lengths of fiber. The bus-lines can be placed as metal strips underneath each fiber and will also act as light scattering sources in the ray-tracing program. In the models, the fiber bundles are observed to be insensitive to exact geometry, suggesting that the implementation of bus-lines will not substantially alter device performance.
The fiber bundles increase the solar cell surface area compared to a planar cell equivalent. By using low-cost materials the cost of the fiber-based tandem can be kept low, however, it will reduce the illumination intensity of a given area of solar cell potentially affecting device performance. A row of fibers has about 3 times more surface area than planar counterpart when lined up in a row. The 10-row deep fiber design in
An individual fiber OPV cell has been shown to be less efficient than its planar counterpart. However, simply placing fibers adjacent to one another overcomes the losses through improved light trapping. Placing the fiber cells in a 3-dimensionally distributed array, matrix, or bundle configuration leads to further enhancements in light trapping, resulting in an external quantum efficiency of the PV cell approaching the internal quantum efficiency. By adding sub-cells that are tuned to efficiently convert light over a specific portion of the solar spectrum, the fiber system that efficiently traps light also acts as a built-in dispersion element, matching incident wavelengths of light to a complementary OPV cell. By virtue of optical microcavity design utilizing metallic electrodes and dielectric coatings, the opposing requirements of electrode transparency and conductivity can be decoupled to an extent. Here we have used a combination of optical and transport models to show that color-tuned OPV cells in a fiber matrix can lead to power conversion efficiencies over 17%, assuming modest absorption coefficients, metallic electrodes, and conservative assumptions regarding the fill factor. Through improved light trapping, broadband sensitivity, and output voltage optimization, this efficiency can be doubled over what is predicted for an optimized single junction cell having similar intrinsic properties. Additionally, improvements in the performance of single junction OPV cells will lead to improved performance of the fiber OPV tandem design.
The OPV device designs based on the reflective tandem concept, and fiber-based sub-cells offer several potentially powerful advantages over conventional planar stacked tandem photovoltaic devices. For example, electrical interconnections can be made with much greater latitude for current and voltage matching, in contrast to series-connected tandem cells. Furthermore, spatially distributed fibers can be placed into an inert matrix material that prevents the diffusion of oxygen and moisture, and offer considerable protection from mechanical damage. Finally, the overall concept of a reflective, inherently dispersive tandem architecture involving volumetrically distributed sub-cells potentially can be applied to other sub-cell shaped and material systems, including inorganic PV cells, and/or combinations of organic and inorganic sub-cells.
The foregoing description of the embodiments has been provided for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention. Individual elements or features of a particular embodiment are generally not limited to that particular embodiment, but, where applicable, are interchangeable and can be used in a selected embodiment, even if not specifically shown or described. The same may also be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the invention, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/324,497, filed on Apr. 15, 2010. The entire disclosure of the above application is incorporated herein by reference.
This invention was made with government support under Grant Nos. FA9550-06-1-0399 and FA9550-09-1-0109 awarded by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61324497 | Apr 2010 | US |