Reflectivity Variation of ICF Target Surfaces

Abstract

In a system and method for controlling energy deposition on a surface of an Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) target when imploding. Providing one or more volume absorber/radiators to absorb the incident beam and reradiate x-ray radiation within the hohlraum containing the ICF target. Varying the reflectivity of the inner wall of the hohlraum wall or outer surface of the ICF target. Further suppressing non-uniformities in the x-ray radiation emitted from the one or more volume absorber/radiators upon one or more materials located on an outer surface of the ICF target or inner surface of said hohlraum.

Description

BACKGROUND

Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) is a process by which energy is produced by nuclear fusion reactions. The fuel pellet, generally called the target, is conventionally a spherical device which contains fuel for the fusion process. Lasers and ion beams have been considered for energizing and imploding the target. If the fuel contained in the target is sufficiently heated and compressed, a self-sustaining fusion reaction can occur.

The conventional approach to ICF target design is exemplified by the Department of Energy's program, National Ignition Facility (“NIF”). NIF target designs, as described in Lindl (Physics of Plasmas v11, number 2), consists of a mostly plastic or beryllium ablator region which surrounds a cryogenic DT ice, and a central void which is filled with very low density DT gas. The target is then placed in a cylindrical hohlraum. The entire target assembly (hohlraum and target) are then placed in the target chamber, and the hohlraum illuminated with a number (192) of discrete beams of laser light. The hohlraum then converts the energy to x-rays, which then ablate the ablator region, and by the reactive force, drives the DT inward. The combination of a non-spherical hohlraum and illumination leads directly to spatial non-uniformities in the target absorbed energy. Even in configurations with spherical hohlraums, the illumination is never spherically symmetric because entrance holes are required to admit the beams. This unsymmetrical illumination leads to unsymmetrical energy absorption by the target which in turn seeds instabilities that can prevent the temperature and density from achieving the necessary values to initiate a useful or self-sustaining fusion reaction.

SUMMARY

In ICF targets, the energy absorbed by the generally spherical target needs to be uniform at the σ_abs^E/E_abs≤1% level (RMS of absorbed energy divided by the absorbed energy) and in some arrangements «1%. In a hohlraum arrangement this is achievable with multiple incoming beams but adds additional requirements on laser or particle beam uniformity and further complicates the beam delivery system. It is the purpose of this invention to reduce σ_abs^E/E_abs by trading off a multiplicity of beams for simpler illumination geometries by modifying some measureable properties of the target or hohlraum wall. It is recognized that feasible arrangements for production of power by ICF require energizing the target assembly over a relatively small solid angle (Tabak, 1997, UCRL-JC-128366 Rev 2, Design of a Distributed Radiator Target for Inertial Fusion Driven from Two Sides with Heavy Ion Beams). In commercial arrangements utilizing fusion power, the solid angle occupied by input beams (laser or particle) must necessarily be small and non-uniform so that the energy generated by a self-sustaining fusion reaction of the target can be efficiently absorbed by the reactor structure and because the target output (energy yielded by the fusion process) may be tailored to project energy into certain angular sectors that must be substantially free from beam entrance apertures.

DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A shows a single narrow beam illumination of a target assembly consisting of a spherical target enclosed by a spherical hohlraum.

FIG. 1B shows a polar plot of ΔE_abs/E_abs when the target has constant reflectivity R_di.

FIG. 1C shows a plot of the diffuse reflectivity R_di (θ, ϕ) on the spherical target surface required to reduce σ_abs^E/E_abs≤1%.

FIG. 2 plots the operating region for the arrangement of FIG. 2A where σ_abs^E/E_abs≤1% overlaid with curves of constant absorption efficiency.

FIG. 3A shows a single annular beam illuminating a spherical target enclosed by a spherical hohlraum.

FIG. 3B plots the operating region for the arrangement of FIG. 3A where σ_abs^E/E_abs≤1% overlaid with curves of constant absorption efficiency.

FIG. 4 plots the operating region where σ_abs^E/E_abs≤1% overlaid with curves of constant absorption efficiency for an annular beam incident on the equator of a spherical target inside a spherical hohlraum.

FIG. 5A shows two narrow beams incident on the north and south poles of a spherical hohlraum enclosing a spherical target.

FIG. 5B plots the operating region for the arrangement of FIG. 5A where σ_abs^E/E_abs≤1% overlaid with curves of constant absorption efficiency.

FIG. 6 shows two annular beams incident from opposite directions on a spherical hohlraum enclosing a spherical target.

FIG. 7A is a perspective view of a spherical target enclosed by a cylindrical hohlraum.

FIG. 7B is a side, cutaway view of the arrangement of FIG. 7A showing an annular beam incident on the target assembly.

FIG. 7C is an end view of the arrangement of FIG. 7C showing the entrance aperture for the incident annular beam.

FIG. 8A is a polar plot of ΔE_abs/E_abs when target of FIG. 7A has constant reflectivity R_di.

FIG. 8B shows a plot of the diffuse reflectivity R_di (θ, ϕ) on the spherical target of FIG. 7A required to minimize σ_abs^E/E_abs.

FIG. 9A shows a spherical target enclosed by an elliptical or ellipsoidal hohlraum.

FIG. 9B shows a spherical target enclosed by a general rotationally symmetric hohlraum.

FIG. 10 is a plot of the diffuse soft X-ray reflectivity as a function of atomic number.

FIG. 11 shows a surface tessellation consisting of three materials in amounts that vary tile by tile.

FIG. 12A is one version of a volume radiator/absorber.

FIG. 12B is another version of a volume radiator/absorber.

FIG. 12C is a volume radiator/absorber embedded in a hohlraum wall.

FIG. 13 shows a target assembly containing a propellant region.

SPECIFICATION

In a target assembly 100 (FIG. 1A), the energy absorbed per unit area on target surface 104 is:

E _abs(x)=(1−R_di)*T_i←o/(1−D_S)I_o   (1)

where R_di is the diffuse reflectivity of target surface 104, T_i←o is the radiation transfer operator from inner wall 112 of hohlraum 110 to the outer surface 104 of target 102, D_S is the round trip scattering operator, and I_o the externally incident intensity on inner hohlraum wall 112. The combined operator T_i←o/(1−D_S) represents multiple scattering or rattling around of radiation between target 102 and hohlraum 110 and tends to spatially homogenize the radiation field. Consequently, varying the reflectivity of the hohlraum wall has less effect on the spatial uniformity of E_abs(_{{right arrow over (x)}}) than varying the reflectivity of target surface 104. For the same reason, spatial variation of R_do (diffuse reflectivity of hohlraum surface 112) does not substantially degrade the homogenization effect of operator T_i←o/(1−D_S). Based on this observation, to leading order the change in R_di (ΔR_di) required to null out any non-uniformity in E_abs(x), ΔE_abs(x)=E_abs(x)−E_abs is

ΔR_di=(1−R_di)*ΔE_abs/E_abs  (2)

where E_abs is the average energy/unit area absorbed by target 102. Equation 2 can be iterated to solution. Alternatively, and in conjunction with this relationship, ΔR_i is expressed as a sum of spherical harmonics (Y_lm′s) and the coefficients varied so as to minimize σ_abs^E/E_abs (RMS of absorbed energy divided by the absorbed energy). During this computation, the reflectivity at all points on target surface 104 is held within physically realizable limits R_di 0.4:0.8-0.9 for instance.

As a first example, beam 130 is incident on target assembly 100, enters hohlraum 110 through entrance aperture 114, is absorbed and reradiated by a volume absorber/radiator 120 resulting in an initial radiation pattern which in this example is approximated by a point source with angular distribution equal to the diffuse (Lambertian) reflection of a narrow beam at location of entrance aperture 114. Hohlraum inner wall surface 112 has a high constant diffuse reflectivity R_do=0.9 and spherical shape with radius r_outer=1 while target outer surface 104 has radius r_inner=0.4 and constant diffuse reflectivity (R_di=0.6). A polar plot (FIG. 1B) of ΔE_abs/E_abs shows variations as large as 3:1 and RMS nonuniformity (σ_abs^E/E_abs) of 40.6%. After optimizing the reflectivity of 104 by varying the reflectivity of the first 10 (1=1:10) Legendre modes while keeping the average (R_di(l=0)=0.6) constant the nonuniformity σ_abs^E/E_abs is reduced to 0.6%, a 66-fold reduction. The resulting reflectivity profile (FIG. 1C) varies over the range R_min:R_max=0.47:0.87. This calculation can be repeated for a variety of geometries (r_inner/r_outer) and average target surface reflectivities (R_di(l=0)). FIG. 2 is the result of this calculation. The x-axis (r_inner/r_outer) is the relative size of target and hohlraum while the y-axis (R_di (l=0)) is the average or l=0 diffuse target reflectivity. Triangles indicate (R_di(l=0)), r_inner/r_outer values where σ_abs^E/E_abs can be reduced to 1% or less by varying the first 10 (1=1:10) Legendre modes. The solid lines labeled 0.2, 0.3 etc. are contours of constant target absorption efficiency (E_abs/E_total where E_total=total energy initially reradiated by volume absorbers 120). As we see from the figure, net absorption efficiencies as high as 45% with absorption uniformities <1% are achievable with a single narrow incident beam. This is probably the most asymmetric geometric situation involving a concentric spherical target and hohlraum. More symmetric initial configurations lead to better results (wider operating window and greater energy deposition uniformity).

Another single sided illumination geometry (FIG. 3A) comprises an annular beam 302 incident on the north pole side of hohlraum 110 at θ=124°, which passes through entrance aperture 114 to the opposite wall, is reradiated by a volume absorber (not shown) resulting in an initial intensity equivalent to the diffuse Lambertian reflection of annular ring 302 on the wall opposite entrance aperture 114. Target/hohlraum assembly 100 consists of concentric spheres. As above, varying the first 10 reflectivity Legendre modes of outer target surface 104 at a variety of geometries (r_inner/r_outer) and l=0 mode reflectivities (R_di(l=0)) results in a wider operating envelope (FIG. 4B) where σ_abs^E/E_abs<1% (triangles). Curves of constant (E_abs/E_total overlay the operating envelope. The resulting operating envelope goes out to absorption efficiencies as high as ≈55%.

Yet another single sided illumination geometry (not shown) is similar to the annular illumination arrangement of FIG. 3A but differs by having the annular beam incident on the equator (θ=90°) of the hohlraum inner wall instead of θ=124°. In practice this would be accomplished by a circumferential structure on the hohlraum wall acting as an effective volume radiator. Repeating the calculations outlined above (l=1:10 mode reflectivity variation) results (FIG. 4) in a still wider 1% operating window and absorption efficiencies as high as ≈65%.

The simplest two sided illumination geometry (FIG. 5A) generalizes the single sided geometry (FIG. 1A) in having two narrow, equal intensity beams 502 incident on opposite sides of spherical hohlraum 110. Repeating the calculations above results in an operating window (FIG. 5B) with absorption efficiencies as high as ≈60+%.

FIG. 6 generalizes the one sided annular beam geometry of FIG. 4A by having two equal intensity annular beams incident 602 at mid latitude positions θ=56° and 124°. This arrangement has higher achievable absorption efficiencies (≈67+%) and a wider operating window where σ_abs^E/E_abs<1%.

In another embodiment (FIGS. 7A-7C) a spherical target 102 is centered inside a cylindrical hohlraum 110 illuminated by an annular beam 302 (FIG. 7B) that is absorbed in volume absorber 120 (FIG. 7B) whose radiation 206 (FIG. 7B) then fills the interior of the hohlraum. FIG. 7B is a cutaway side view of target assembly 100 and FIG. 7C views target assembly 100 from the hohlraum circular face side and shows entrance aperture 114 and opaque face 702.

As a specific example of optimizing the reflectivity of the target L_H/D_tar=D_H/D_tar=2, FIG. 8A shows a polar plot of the non-uniformity ΔE_abs/E_abs for an uncompensated target. In this case, σ_abs^E/E_abs=34%. After adjusting the reflectivity of target 102 for low order modes 1=1:10 (FIG. 8B is the calculated reflectivity), the non-uniformity drops to σ_abs^E/E_abs=0.13%, a 260× reduction. More complex illumination geometries involving narrow beams, multiple annular beams and combinations thereof can also have their target reflectivity optimized. So far the specific calculations displayed have cylindrical symmetry and we only needed to vary the spherical harmonics Y_l,m=0(θ, ϕ)˜P_l(θ) along the axis of symmetry. Indeed, for the sphere in cylinder calculation (illustrated in FIGS. 7A, B, and C), the obscuration effects of the four supporting tabs (704, FIG. 7C) were ignored. Including their effect requires us to utilize spherical harmonics, Y_lm's with m≠0. This will be the case in more general illumination geometries.

Beyond cylindrical and spherical hohlraums, this technique also applies to elliptical (FIG. 9A) or more generally shaped hohlraums 110 (FIG. 9B). Both arrangements feature a spherical target 102 inside a hohlraum 110 with volume absorbers 120 that absorb energy from incident beam 130 and reradiate it typically as X-rays 206. Volume absorber/radiator 120 is set away from beam entrance aperture 114 to minimize losses from radiation reflected or otherwise generated by volume absorbers 120.

As described above in detail for some simple geometries we can also greatly decrease σ_abs^E/E_abs in more general target assembly geometries, including asymmetric hohlraums and targets. Also, any incident radiation condition whose spatial and angular radiation characteristics are known in advance can be compensated for to greatly decrease σ_abs^E/E_abs. This includes finite area, unequal intensity beams.

In another aspect of this invention (generally referring to FIGS. 9A and 9B) by itself or in addition to varying the reflectivity of target surface 104, we can vary the reflectivity of inner hohlraum surface 112. Although, and this was noted above, varying this reflectivity has less direct effect on reducing target ΔE_abs, it can be utilized to reduce the amplitudes of some of the lower order (l<˜3) modes, thus simplifying the physical implementation of target surface reflectivity variation.

In still another aspect of this invention, the shape of hohlraum inner surface 112 can be varied and this can be helpful in reducing the total required variation (max|_θ,φ(R_di(θ, ϕ))−min|_θ,φ(R_di(θ, ϕ)) of the target surface reflectivity.

The calculations presented so far utilized a time independent view factor calculation assuming a very short (delta function) beam temporal pulse length. The validity of these calculations was verified using time dependent view factor calculations with a non-zero pulse length.

Spatial variation of R_d (on target or hohlraum surface) requires a corresponding variation in materials. FIG. 10 shows an approximation (adapted from Murakami & Meyer-ter-Vehn, indirectly driven targets for inertial confinement fusion, Nuclear Fusion, v31, pg. 1132-1145) for the soft X-ray diffuse reflectivity of various materials as a function of Z. While simple and neglecting spectral effects it shows the systematic trends with atomic number Z. Because of the gap, G, between hohlraum inner surface and target surface the hohlraum reflectivity, R_do({right arrow over (x)}), can vary discontinuously on scales Δ|({right arrow over (x)})|<L_cell˜G/10 and not significantly imprint ΔE_abs({right arrow over (x)}) Because of this, we can modulate R_do({right arrow over (x)}) by using two or more materials discretely deposited in different proportions over cells of one or more shapes to tessellate or otherwise cover the hohlraum surface. A sample tessellation 1100 (FIG. 11) consisting of rectangular cells 1102 with transverse dimension ˜L_cell and within each cell three materials (vertical lines 1110, diagonal hatching 1111, horizontal lines 1112) are deposited in discrete regions in different proportions (1110, 1111, 1112 vs 1110′, 1111′, 1112′). The different proportions of material in each cell result in a different average diffuse reflectivity over each cell which can be continuously varied by changing the size of individual material regions (1110, 1111, 1112). Of course, we could tessellate the hohlraum in other patterns utilizing one or more sized/shaped cells 1102. This spatial tessellation with discrete material regions can be used on the target surface but the cell size, L_cell, is dictated by the transverse (perpendicular to surface normal) mixing length (L_Xmix) which is typically «G.

If we cannot vary the target surface reflectivity (R_di(θ, ϕ)) using discrete tessellation, then thin lamina consisting of two or more materials are deposited in alternating layers whose thickness varies continuously with position (θ, ϕ) on the target surface.

In the foregoing we have referred to volume absorbers or volume radiators 120. FIGS. 12A-C illustrate some forms they can take. In FIG. 12A incident light beam 130 impinges on volume radiator 120. Within the non-convex beam trap/re-radiator lies a material having a wedged geometry 1210 forcing any specular reflection component to be directed away from entrance hole (not shown) for beam 130. Any light absorbed by material 1210 is isotropically re-radiated. FIG. 12B illustrates another volume radiator 120 combining the non-convex geometry of 1230 with an under dense foam blob 1220 that acts as an absorber and local re-radiator. The arrangement of FIG. 12C embeds under dense foam blob 1220 in a non-convex cavity within the inner hohlraum wall 112.

In yet another aspect of this invention, volume absorbers embedded within hohlraum wall 112 (as in FIG. 12C) can have their absorptivity varied to compensate for hohlraum geometry and source intensity.

As an example, in a target assembly (FIG. 13), higher pushing efficiency for shells may be realized by tamping the heated region that is produced by laser and/or X-ray irradiation of an ICF target. The overall uniformity is critical to the pushing pressure profile. Also, tailoring the properties of the radiators 1314, such as the opacity and/or density, may be utilized to produce a uniform pushing profile with a non-uniform local deposition ratio into the propellant region 1312. The radiators may also be graded to make the pushing profile more uniform.

Target assembly 1300 comprises a central spherical fuel region, the inner fuel region 1302. Surrounding the inner fuel region 1302 is an inner shell 1304 and outer shell 1308. In the space between the inner shell 1304 and outer shell 1308 is an outer fuel region 1306. Surrounding the outer shell 1308 is a propellant region 1312. A plurality of gold foam radiators 1314 are arranged in a one-to-one correspondence with the cylindrical beam channels 1320 located in case 1316. The cylindrical beam channels 1320 completely penetrate through case 1316. Relative to ICF target assembly previously discussed, case 1316 may be considered analogous to the hohlraum (110, FIG. 1) and propellant region 1312 may be considered analogous to the vacuum or gas-filled space 106 (FIG. 1) between the hohlraum inner wall 112 (FIG. 1) and target outer wall 104 (FIG. 1).

In another variation of this invention, FIG. 14, when the space 1312 between target outer surface 1310 and hohlraum or case inner wall 1302 is filled with propellant as described above, one or both surfaces (1302 or 1310) can have their diffuse reflectivity varied to adjust out non-uniformities in energy absorbed on target surface 1310. In this case, calculations determining the required diffuse reflectivity or hohlraum shaped profiles may utilize more sophisticated view factor methods or the full time-dependent radiative transport equations.

Additionally, the embodiments discussed in this application are exemplary and not an exhaustive enumeration of variants. Features discussed as part of separate embodiments may be combined into a single embodiment. Further, embodiments may make use of other features known in the art but not explicitly cited in this application.

Claims

1. A system for controlling energy deposition on a surface of an Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) target when imploding, the system comprising: a hohlraum;one or more openings within said hohlraum to receive an incident beam;one or more volume absorber/radiators, located within said hohlraum and positioned to align in a one-to-one correspondence with each of the openings of said hohlraum, wherein the one or more volume absorber/radiators absorb and reradiate the incident beam as x-ray radiation;an ICF target located within said hohlraum; andone or more materials located on an outer surface of said ICF target or inner surface of said hohlraum, wherein said one or more materials vary across the outer surface of said ICF target or inner surface of the hohlraum.

2. The system as in claim 1, wherein said one or more openings is of an annular ring-shape and said one or more volume absorber/radiators is of an annular ring-shape.

3. The system as in claim 1 wherein said one or more volume absorber/radiators is located at a distance separated from the one or more openings to minimize losses from the x-ray radiation reflected or generated by said one or more volume absorber/radiators.

4. The system as in claim 1 wherein said one or more volume absorber/radiators is located directly adjacent to the one or more openings.

5. The system as in claim 1, wherein the one or more volume absorber/radiators are spherical in shape and located in a propellant region outside of said ICF target.

6. The system as in claim 5, wherein the one or more volume absorber/radiators are different concentrations.

7. The system as in claim 1, wherein the one or more materials are discretely deposited in different proportions over cells of one or more shapes to tessellate the hohlraum inner surface or target outer surface.

8. The system of claim 7, wherein said one or more shapes comprises rectangular cells extending in a transverse dimension across the hohlraum inner surface or target outer surface; wherein said one or more shapes include diagonal hatching, horizontal lines and vertical lines which are deposited in discrete regions and in different proportions within each rectangular cell.

9. The system as in claim 1, further comprising two or more materials of thin lamina deposited in alternating layers with a continuously varying thickness across the outer surface of said ICF target or inner surface of said hohlraum.

10. The system as in claim 1, wherein the one or more materials vary in reflectivity properties.

11. A method of controlling energy deposition on a surface of an Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) target when imploding, the method comprising: inserting an ICF target within a hohlraum;providing one or more openings within said hohlraum to receive an incident beam;providing one or more volume absorber/radiators within said hohlraum and positioned in a one-to-one correspondence with each of the openings of said hohlraum;receiving the incident beam upon the one or more volume absorber/radiators;absorbing the incident beam and reradiating x-ray radiation within said hohlraum;accelerating inwardly a shell of said ICF target when hit by said x-ray radiation;compressing a fuel region within said shell of said ICF target by the inward acceleration of said shell; andsuppressing non-uniformities in the x-ray radiation emitted from the one or more volume absorber/radiators upon one or more materials located on an outer surface of said ICF target or inner surface of said hohlraum, wherein said one or more materials vary across the outer surface of said ICF target or inner surface of the hohlraum.

12. The method as in claim 11, further comprises irradiating an annular beam of radiation through an annular ring-shaped aperture and impinging the annular ring-shaped beam of radiation upon an annular ring-shaped volume absorber/radiator.

13. The method as in claim 11, further comprises minimizing losses from the x-ray radiation reflected or generated by the one or more volume absorber/radiators by placing the one or more volume absorber/radiators at a distance separated from the one or more openings.

14. The method as in claim 11, further comprises receiving the incident radiation upon the one or more volume absorber/radiators directly adjacent to the one or more openings.

15. The method as in claim 11, wherein the step of providing one or more volume absorber/radiators further comprises providing spherical shaped volume absorber/radiators, in a propellant region outside of said ICF target

16. The method as in claim 15, further comprising suppressing non-uniformities of the x-radiation by varying the concentration of the spherical shape volume absorber/radiators.

17. The method as in claim 11, further comprising suppressing non-uniformities in the x-ray radiation as it interacts with the one or more materials that are discretely deposited in different proportions over cells of one or more shapes to tessellate the hohlraum inner surface or target outer surface.

18. The method as in claim 15, wherein the step of varying the one or more shapes comprises rectangular cells extending in a transverse dimension across the hohlraum inner surface or target outer surface and include diagonal hatching, horizontal lines and vertical lines which are deposited in discrete regions and in different proportions within each rectangular cell.

19. The method as in claim 11, further comprising suppressing non-uniformities in the x-ray radiation as it interacts with two or materials of thin lamina deposited in alternating layers with a continuously varying thickness across the outer surface of said ICF target or inner surface of said hohlraum

20. The system as in claim 11, further comprising reducing the variation in energy deposition on said ICF target by varying the reflectivity of the one or more materials.