1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to reflector antenna radomes. More particularly, the invention relates to a reflector antenna radome with a backlobe suppression ring around the radome periphery.
2. Description of Related Art
The front to back (F/B) ratio of a reflector antenna indicates the proportion of the maximum antenna signal that is radiated in any backward directions relative to the main beam, across the operating band. Rearward signal patterns, also known as backlobes, are generated by edge diffraction occurring at the periphery of the reflector dish. Where significant backlobes are generated, signal interference with other RF systems may occur and overall antenna efficiency is reduced. Local and international standards groups have defined acceptable F/B ratios for various RF operating frequency bands.
Prior reflector antennas have used a range of different solutions to maintain an acceptable F/B ratio. For example, conical RF shields which extend forward of the reflector may be applied. However, shield structures increase the overall size, wind load and thereby structural requirements of the antenna, increasing overall antenna and antenna support structure costs. Edge profiling, chokes and or reflector edge notching/serration patterns have been formed in and or applied to the reflector dish periphery. However, these structures, in addition to significantly increasing the manufacturing costs of the resulting antenna, increase antenna wind loading and are typically optimized for a specific frequency band which limits the available market segments for each specific reflector dish design, decreasing manufacturing efficiencies.
F/B ratio is especially significant in modern shield less deep dish reflectors. Deep dish reflectors, by having a low focal length to reflector dish diameter ratio, may be formed with increased aperture efficiency and low side lobes without requiring peripheral shielding. However, to achieve these radiation patterns, the edges of the deep dish reflectors are designed to have higher signal illumination levels relative to shallow dish designs, increasing reflector edge diffraction and thereby generating significant backlobes.
Competition within the reflector antenna industry has focused attention on RF signal pattern optimization, structural integrity, as well as materials and manufacturing operations costs. Also, increased manufacturing efficiencies, via standardized reflector antenna components usable in configurations adaptable for multiple frequency bands is a growing consideration in the reflector antenna market.
Therefore, it is an object of the invention to provide an apparatus that overcomes deficiencies in the prior art.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with a general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
a and 4b are charts demonstrating comparative measured signal radiation patterns, in h and e planes respectively, of a reflector antenna operating at 12.7 GHz with and without a backlobe suppression ring according to the invention.
The invention is described in an exemplary embodiment applied upon a radome also having toolless quick attach/detach features further described in U.S. utility patent application Ser. No. 10/604,756 “Dual Radius Twist Lock Radome and Reflector Antenna for Radome”, by Junaid Syed et al, filed Aug. 14, 2003 and hereby incorporated by reference in the entirety. The invention is described herein with respect to a single profile radome. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may also be applied, for example, to the dual radius radome configurations disclosed in the aforementioned application.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in greater detail in
The radome 9 has an outer diameter adapted to enable coupling of the radome 9 upon the distal open end of the reflector 7. The BSR 11, formed about the outer surface of the radome periphery does not significantly increase the radome outer diameter. Therefore, the addition of the BSR 11 to the radome 9 does not significantly add to the antenna 1 wind load. Also, because the BSR 11 may be as formed as a thin metalised layer, it does not significantly increase weight and therefore the structural requirements of the antenna 1 or antenna 1 support structures.
In operation, RF signals which would otherwise edge diffract rearward at the outward facing reflector 7 edge are instead trapped by the generally radially inward facing radome 9 outer 15 surface and or inner 13 surface edge(s) of the BSR 11. Due to the inward facing edge(s) 16 presented by the BSR 11, backwards edge diffracted energy overall is significantly reduced.
Contrary to prior frequency specific serrated, notched or choke reflector edge configurations, the BSR 11 may be applied without complex or precise design of the BSR 11 geometry. A general limit of the BSR 11 inner radius is that the BSR 11 should not project inward to a point where it will significantly interfere with the forward beam pattern of the antenna 1, for example extending inward not substantially farther than an inner diameter of the reflector 7 distal end. To further minimize spill over in forward hemisphere, an absorber 17 may be applied between the radome 9 and the reflector 7. The absorber 17 may be formed from an RF absorbing material and or an RF absorbing coating applied to the radome 9 and or the reflector 7 periphery.
Measured test range data, as shown in
Similarly,
The present invention brings to the art a radome which cost efficiently improves the F/B ratio of an antenna. The invention may be applied to new or existing antennas without significantly increasing the antenna weight and or wind load characteristics. The invention provides F/B ratio improvement independent of antenna operating frequency and does not place any additional requirements upon the design and or manufacture of the reflector 7 dish.
Where in the foregoing description reference has been made to ratios, integers, components or modules having known equivalents then such equivalents are herein incorporated as if individually set forth.
While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of the embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus, methods, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departure from the spirit or scope of applicant's general inventive concept. Further, it is to be appreciated that improvements and/or modifications may be made thereto without departing from the scope or spirit of the present invention as defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2413187 | McCurdy et al. | Dec 1946 | A |
3140491 | Ashbaugh et al. | Jul 1964 | A |
3599219 | Holtum, Jr. et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
4581615 | Levy | Apr 1986 | A |
4876554 | Tubbs | Oct 1989 | A |
5298911 | Li | Mar 1994 | A |
5341150 | Joy | Aug 1994 | A |
6137449 | Kildal | Oct 2000 | A |
6339393 | Burnside et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6522305 | Sharman | Feb 2003 | B1 |
20020008670 | Sharman | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030038753 | Mahon | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040233116 | Desargant et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050248495 | Webb et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050190116 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |