1. Statement of the Technical Field
The inventive arrangements relate to reflectors that focus electromagnetic energy in applications such as, but not limited to, radio-frequency (RF) antennae, solar collectors, cameras and other optical devices, etc.
2. Description of the Related Art
Reflectors used in RF antennas, solar collectors, optical devices, etc. are usually shaped so as to focus electromagnetic energy at a particular point or area, or in a particular direction, such as at an antenna feed system mounted on or proximate the reflector. Reflectors of this kind are commonly shaped to have a three-dimensional curved surface, such as a parabolic surface. Reflectors are usually configured in a solid or a mesh configuration. A solid reflector may comprise, for example, a rigid frame with a solid reflective skin mounted thereon. Wire mesh reflectors typically comprise a flexible metallic mesh supported on a framework of rigid, radially-oriented ribs.
Solid reflectors generally provide higher performance than mesh reflectors, i.e., a solid reflector usually will focus the electromagnetic energy incident thereupon with less loss as compared to a mesh reflector of the same or similar size. Moreover, the mesh of a mesh reflector may require individual positional or cord adjustments at hundreds or even thousands of locations thereon during its assembly and after deployment to achieve a required performance level. Even with such time-consuming and labor-intensive adjustments, it can be difficult to achieve a surface roughness, i.e., deviation from an ideal surface profile, of less that 0.010-inch (0.25 mm) in a mesh reflector. A surface roughness of 0.010-inch or less is generally required when the reflector is used to focus high-frequency RF signals such as Ka and Ku-band transmissions. Thus, the performance of wire-mesh reflectors is usually limited in such applications.
Mesh reflectors, however, can have advantages relating their stored volume. In particular, mesh reflectors usually can be folded into a compact configuration, thereby facilitating storage in relatively small volumes. A typical solid reflector, by contrast, is not foldable, and therefore has a larger ratio of stowed-to-deployed volume than a mesh reflector having an aperture of comparable size. This characteristic can be particularly disadvantageous in satellite and other space-based applications due to limitations on the size of the fairings in which the reflectors are typically stowed prior to deployment. Solid reflectors with apertures greater than 3.5 m typically need to be partitioned to fit in the fairing volume, making mesh reflectors more attractive for larger aperture reflectors. Thus, solid reflectors having apertures greater 3.5 meters (11.5 feet) diameter are not commonly used in space-based applications, or in airborne and other mobile applications.
Reflector systems comprising a reflector formed from rigid panels mounted on a centrally-located hub are provided. The panels can be stowed in a relatively compact arrangement in which the panels overlap. The panels are configured to translate with a combination of rotational and linear motion so that the panels become disposed in a side by side relationship, thereby deploying the reflector so that the reflector can focus electromagnetic energy incident thereupon.
A reflector system comprises a plurality of reflective panels, and a hub. The hub comprises a plurality of concentric rings each having a respective one of the panels mounted thereon, and an actuator mechanically coupled to the panels through the rings. The actuator is operable to move the panels between a stowed configuration wherein the panels are stacked in relation to each other, and a deployed configuration wherein the panels are positioned in a side by side relationship so that the panels form a reflector capable of focusing electromagnetic energy incident thereupon.
Another reflector system comprises a hub having a plurality of concentric rings. The system also comprises a plurality of rigid panels mounted on the rings and configured to move between a stowed configuration wherein the panels substantially overlap, and a deployed configuration wherein the panels form a reflector capable of focusing electromagnetic energy incident thereupon.
An antenna system comprises a feed system, and a reflector system. The reflector system comprises a hub and a plurality of rigid panels mounted on the hub. The panels are configured to move between a stowed configuration wherein the panels substantially overlap, and a deployed configuration wherein the panels form a reflector capable of focusing radio-frequency energy at the feed system.
Embodiments will be described with reference to the following drawing figures, in which like numerals represent like items throughout the figures and in which:
FIB. 12C is a side view of an alternative embodiment of the synchronizer shown in
The invention is described with reference to the attached figures. The figures are not drawn to scale and they are provided merely to illustrate the instant invention. Several aspects of the invention are described below with reference to example applications for illustration. It should be understood that numerous specific details, relationships, and methods are set forth to provide a full understanding of the invention. One having ordinary skill in the relevant art, however, will readily recognize that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details or with other methods. In other instances, well-known structures or operation are not shown in detail to avoid obscuring the invention. The invention is not limited by the illustrated ordering of acts or events, as some acts may occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other acts or events. Furthermore, not all illustrated acts or events are required to implement a methodology in accordance with the invention.
The figures depict a reflector system 10. The reflector system 10 comprises a reflector 11, and a hub 12. The reflector 11 comprises ten solid-skin, rigid panels 14 mounted on the hub 12 via mounts 13 as shown in
The reflector system 10 can be part of an antenna system 17, which may be a Ka band antenna for example. The antenna system 17 can include a feed system 18 directly mounted to the reflector system 10. The feed system 18 is depicted schematically in
The optimal number of panels 14 in the reflector system 10 is application-dependent, and can vary with operational requirements such as the diameter of the reflector 11, the gain of the reflector 11, the relative positions of the feed system 18 and the reflector 11, the operating frequency of the feed system 18, the stored volume of the reflector system 10, etc.
Each panel 14 can include a core (not shown), and a solid external skin 22 that covers the core. The skin can be formed from, for example, graphite. The core can be formed from, for example, aramid, aluminum, or graphite, and can have a honeycomb structure. Specific materials for the core and the skin 22, and a specific type of structure for the core are disclosed for exemplary purposes only. Other types of materials for the core and skin 22, and other types of structures for the core can be used in the alternative. Moreover, the panels 14 can be formed from a rigid wire-mesh in alternative embodiments.
The panels 14 can be shaped so that the reflector 11 has a curved three-dimensional shape when deployed, as shown in
The skin 22 of each panel 14 preferably has a surface roughness of approximately 0.010-inch or lower, root mean square (RMS) to facilitate optimal reflection of high-frequency radio frequency (RF) signals.
The hub 12 can include a first or upper shell 30, eight shells or rings 32, and a second or lower shell 34, as shown in
The upper shell 30, rings 32, and lower shell 34 are concentrically positioned about a central axis “X” of the hub 12, and are nested within each other. The X axis is denoted in FIGS. 9 and 10. The upper shell 30, rings 32, and lower shell 34 can translate in relation to each other in the axial (“X”) direction, to configure the hub 12 between an extended configuration shown in
The upper shell 30, rings 32, and lower shell 34 are fully nested within each other, as depicted in
The upper shell 30, rings 32, and lower shell 34 are partially nested within each other, as depicted for example in
Each ring 32 includes five substantially identical segments 50. The optimal number of segments 50 in each ring 32 is application-dependent, and can vary with factors such as the overall size of the hub 12. Each segment 50 is separated from its adjacent segments by notches 52 as shown, for example, in
Each segment 50 also includes an end portion 56 as shown, for example, in
The upper shell 30 includes a ring portion 60, and a plurality of struts 62 that adjoin the inner circumference of the ring portion 60, as shown in
The lower shell 34 includes a ring portion 70, and a flange portion 72 that adjoins a bottom edge of the ring portion 70, as shown in
The reflector system 10 can be mounted via the lower shell 34. For example,
The hub 12 also includes an actuator 90 as shown, for example, in
The actuator 90 also includes a ball screw assembly comprising a ball screw 96 and a ball nut 98, as shown in
The actuator 90 also includes a synchronizer 100, depicted in
The synchronizer 100 has a plurality of legs 101 that extend downwardly and outwardly, from the perspective of
The synchronizer 100 has an upper position, depicted in
The hub 66 of the upper shell 30 includes two tabs 108, depicted in
The synchronizer 100 is biased downwardly, from the perspective of
As discussed below, the second pins 110 can move out of the second slot 112 and thereby disengage from the synchronizer 100 when the panels 14 reach their semi-deployed configuration shown in
The ball screw 96 will rotate in relation to the ball nut 98 when the synchronizer 100 and the lower shell 34 are decoupled from the ball screw 96. The rotation of the ball screw 96 in relation to the ball nut 98 causes the ball nut 98 and the lower shell 34, to which the ball nut 98 is fixed, to move downwardly or upwardly in relation to the upper shell 30, depending on the direction of rotation of the ball screw 96, as depicted in
The reflector 11 can be deployed in a two-step process. The panels are initially rotated from their stacked to their semi-deployed configuration, while the hub 12 remains in its extended configuration. The hub 12 is then moved axially, from its extend position to its retracted configuration, to bring the panels 14 into their side by side deployed relationship, thereby configuring the reflector 11 into its final parabolic profile.
Deployment of the reflector 11 is initiated by activating the motor 92, which causes the attached ball screw 96 to rotate in relation to the motor 92. At the start of the deployment process, as shown in
The motor 92, upon activation, exerts a torque on the ball screw 96. The ball screw 92, in turn, exerts a reactive torque on the motor 92. The lower shell 34 is fixed in relation to the structure adjacent to the reflector system 10, and the ball screw 92 is fixed to the lower shell 34 via the first pin 104. Therefore, the reactive force exerted by the ball screw 96 on the motor 92 causes the upper shell 30, to which the motor 92 is fixed, to rotate in relation to the ball screw 96 and the lower shell 34. The upper shell 30 can also rotate in relation to the rings 32.
The rotation of the upper shell 30 eventually causes each of the projections 68 on the upper shell 30 to abut an end portion 56 of one of the segments 50 on the adjacent, or uppermost ring 32 as depicted in
Further rotation of the upper shell 30 after the projections 68 have contacted the end portions 56 of the adjacent ring 32 causes the adjacent ring 32 to rotate along with the upper shell 30, i.e., the adjacent ring 32 is pushed in the direction of rotation of the upper shell 30 by the projections 68.
Continued rotation of the upper shell 30 and the uppermost ring 32 eventually causes the projections 54 on the uppermost ring 32 to contact the end portions 56 on the segments 52 of its adjacent, or second highest ring 32, as shown in
The above deployment process continues as the upper shell 30 continues to rotate, with each ring 32 causing its adjacent ring 32 to rotate, until the lowermost ring 32 has been rotated so that its projections 54 engage the end portions 82 on the ring portion 70 of the lower shell 34 as shown in
Until this point in the deployment process, the engagement of the first pin 104 and the synchronizer 100 has prevented relative rotation between the lower shell 34 and the ball screw 96. Thus, the ball screw 96 has not rotated in relation to the ball nut 98, the relative axial positions of the lower shell 34 and the ball screw 96 have remained the same, and the hub 12 has remained in its extended position.
As discussed above, the engagement of the synchronizer 100 and the second pins 110 hold the synchronizer 100 in its upper position, causing the first pin 104 to remain in the first slot 120 in the synchronizer 100, which in turn causes the ball screw 96 and the lower shell 34 to remain coupled to the synchronizer 100.
The hub 12 is configured so that the second pins 110 can exit the second slot 112 as the panels 14 reach their semi-deployed configuration, thereby permitting the synchronizer 100 to move to its lower position. When the synchronizer 100 is in its lower position, the first pin 104 is disengaged from the first slot 120, and the synchronizer 100 thereby is decoupled from the first pin 104 and the ball screw 96, which in turn permits the hub 12 to retract as discussed below.
Disengagement of the second pins 110 from the second slot 112 can be effectuated through the use of two slots 116 formed in the synchronizer 100, as shown in
The synchronizer 100 can be configured so that the second pins 110, which are mounted on the upper shell 30, each align with a respective one of the third slots 116 as the upper shell 30 reaches the end of its rotational movement, which coincides with the panels 14 reaching their semi-deployed configuration. When the second pins 110 align with the third slots 116, the second pins 110 can exit the synchronizer 100 so that the synchronizer 100 is no longer held in its upper position by the second pins 110, and the synchronizer 100 can move downwardly under its spring bias to its lower position, as denoted by the arrow 119 in
Rotation of the synchronizer 100a in relation to the second pins 110 causes the second pins 110 to travel gradually toward the open end of the second slot 112a. The spiral configuration of the slot 112a causes the second pins 110 to cam, or urge the synchronizer 100a downward as the synchronizer 100a rotates in relation to the second pins 110. The second slot 112a is configured so that one of the second pins 110 exits the second slot 112a before the shell 30 reaches the end of its rotational movement, and the other one of the second pins 110 exits the slot 112a as the shell 30 reaches the end of its rotational movement and the synchronizer 100a reaches a lower position as shown in
The first pin 104 disengages from the first slot when the synchronizer 100a reaches its lower position. The synchronizer 100a thereby becomes decoupled from rotation with the ball screw 96 when the upper shell 30 reaches the end of its rotational movement and the panels 14 reach their semi-deployed configuration, and the hub 14 can move to its retracted position as discussed below.
The ball nut 98 is fixed to the lower shell 34. The ball screw 96 thus rotates in relation of the ball nut 98 once the lower shell 34 has been decoupled from the ball screw 96. Because the reflector system 10 is mounted via the lower shell 34, the lower shell 34 and the attached ball nut 98 remain stationary in relation to the rotating ball screw 96. Rotation of the ball screw 96 in relation to the stationary ball nut 98 causes the ball screw 96 to translate downwardly, or “walk down,” the ball nut 98 as shown in
The downward movement of the upper shell 30 causes the ring portion 60 of the upper shell 30 to retract, or nest, within the adjacent, or uppermost ring 32 as depicted in
The mount 13 of the panel 14 associated with the upper shell 30 contacts the upper edge of the adjacent, or uppermost ring 32 when the ring portion 60 of the upper shell 30 has fully retracted into the uppermost ring 32, as shown in
As the retraction process continues, each ring 32 retracts or nests within its adjacent ring 32, and the projections 54 of each ring 30 become disposed within the notches 52 the adjacent ring 32 as the mounts 13 associated with the upper shell 30 and the higher rings 32 urge each successive ring 32 downward. Alternatively, the projections 68, 54 on the upper shell 30 and the rings 32 can be configured so that the projections 68, 54, rather than the mounts 13, exert a downward force on the rings 32 during the retraction process.
The lowermost ring 32 eventually retracts within the ring portion 70 of the lower shell 34, and the projections 54 of the lowermost ring 52 become disposed within the notches 84 in the lower shell 34. The hub 12 at this point has been fully retracted, and the motor 92 can be deactivated based on input from a suitable sensor such as a limit switch (not shown). Alternatively, or in addition, the motor 92 can be equipped with a clutch (not shown) that causes the motor 92 to disengage from the ball screw 96 when the hub 12 has been fully retracted. All of the panels 14 at this point are in a side by side relationship, and the reflector 11 is in its fully deployed parabolic configuration as depicted in
It is believed that the above deployment process, when conducted under one-g or zero-acceleration conditions, can be performed without the use, or with minimal use of counter-balance tooling.
If required or otherwise desired for a particular application, the actuator 90 can be configured so that the reflector 11 can be returned to its stowed configuration after being deployed. In particular, the motor 92 can be reversed so that the ball nut 98 walks up the ball screw 96, thereby moving the hub 12 from its retracted to its extended configuration, which in turn moves the panels 14 from their deployed to their semi-deployed configuration. The synchronizer 100 can be equipped with provisions (not shown) that move the synchronizer 100 upward at this point, so that the first pin 104 becomes disposed in the first slot 120 of the synchronizer and thereby re-engages the synchronizer 100, thereby coupling the ball screw 96 and the lower shell 34. Reverse operation of motor 92 after this point will rotate the panels 14 from their semi-deployed to their stacked configuration.
A particular configuration for the actuator 90 has been disclosed herein for exemplary purposes only. Virtually any type of mechanism that can generate the above-described rotational and axial movement of the various components of the reflector system 10 can be used as the actuator 90. For example, in one possible alternative embodiment, a lead screw can be used in lieu of the ball screw assembly. In other alternative embodiments, the actuator 90 can include two motors. One of the motors can be used to effectuate the rotational movement of the panels 14, and the other motor can be used to effectuate the linear or axial movement of the various components of the hub 12. In other alternative embodiments, one or more hydraulic or pneumatic actuators can be used in lieu of the motor 92.
The reflector system 10 can include provisions to secure the ends of adjacent panels 14 to each other when the reflector 11 is in its deployed configuration. For example, each panel 14 can be equipped with plungers or detent pins 130 positioned along one or both of its left and right edges.
Spring-loaded latches (not shown) can be used in lieu of the detent pins 130 in alternative embodiments. Each latch can have a spring-load pin that engages an adjacent panel 14 via a penetration formed in the adjacent panel in lieu of the recesses 132.
In an alternative embodiment, a toothed spline 140, shown in
A plurality of pins 142 can be mounted proximate the right edge of each panel 14. The pins 142 and the spline 140 can be positioned so that each pin 142 aligns with an area 144 defined by one of the teeth 146 of the spline 140 on an adjacent panel 14, when the panels 14 are rotated into their semi-deployed configuration. Each pin 142 becomes disposed in the associated area 144 as the hub 12 is retracted and the adjacent panels 14 are drawn together into their side by side relationship.
The spline 140 can subsequently be pulled inwardly toward the central X axis, in the direction denoted by the arrow 146. Additional pins 148 can be mounted on each panel 14 proximate the spline 140, as shown in
In another alternative embodiment, magnetic elements 150 can be mounted on the edges of each panel 14 as shown in
In another alternative embodiment, depicted in
The reflector system 10 permits a solid reflector to be stored in a compact volume. Thus, the high performance of a solid reflector can be achieved, while at the same time achieving the relatively low storage volume usually associated with flexible wire-mesh reflectors of lesser performance.
Moreover, as a result of the solid-panel configuration, there is no need to make hundred or thousands of cord adjustments to the reflector before and after deployment, as may be required with a flexible wire-mesh reflector to achieve the requisite surface roughness. Also, the solid-panel configuration of the reflector 11 is believed to a more predictable or determinate deployment than a flexible mesh reflector since there are no cords to manage during launch in space-based applications. Moreover, it is believed that the number of parts, and the overall cost of a stowable, solid-panel reflector such as reflector 11 are less than that of a wire-mesh reflector of comparable size and surface roughness.
For example, it is predicted that a solid-panel reflector having an aperture of approximately five meters, constructed with foldable panels as in the reflector system 10, will have a comparable, or potentially smaller stowed volume than a five-meter diameter radial ribwire mesh reflector.
Moreover, the predicted height of the five-meter solid-panel reflector, i.e., the dimension along the lengthwise direction of the stacked panels 14, is approximately 114.5 inches (2.91 meters). The height of the five-meter mesh reflector, by contrast, is approximately 131.7 inches (3.35 meters). This height difference is attributable to the non-scalloped edges of the solid reflector 11, which result in a smaller overall diameter for a solid reflector having the same effective aperture as a flexible wire-mesh reflector with scalloped edges.
The use of the reflector system 10 can thus facilitate the use of relatively large, e.g., five-meter aperture or greater, solid reflectors in applications, e.g., satellite communications, where the use of reflectors of such size would not otherwise be possible or practicable. For example,
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2763002 | Fitzgerald et al. | Sep 1956 | A |
3235872 | Schepis | Feb 1966 | A |
3286259 | Carman et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3286270 | Kelly | Nov 1966 | A |
3360798 | Webb | Dec 1967 | A |
3372396 | Braccini | Mar 1968 | A |
3541569 | Berks et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3715760 | Palmer | Feb 1973 | A |
3717879 | Ganssle | Feb 1973 | A |
3971023 | Taggart | Jul 1976 | A |
3978490 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4030103 | Campbell | Jun 1977 | A |
4201991 | Vines | May 1980 | A |
4315265 | Palmer et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4506271 | Gonzalez | Mar 1985 | A |
4511901 | Westphal | Apr 1985 | A |
4527166 | Luly | Jul 1985 | A |
4529277 | Gee et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4608571 | Luly | Aug 1986 | A |
4642652 | Herbig et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4646102 | Akaeda et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4780726 | Archer et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4783662 | Wirth, Jr. et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4811034 | Kaminskas | Mar 1989 | A |
4815525 | Readman | Mar 1989 | A |
4862190 | Palmer et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4893132 | Habibi | Jan 1990 | A |
4899167 | Westphal | Feb 1990 | A |
5061945 | Hull et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5128688 | West | Jul 1992 | A |
5198832 | Higgins et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5255006 | Pappas et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5257034 | Turner et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5334990 | Robinson | Aug 1994 | A |
5451975 | Miller et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5644322 | Hayes et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
6219009 | Shipley et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6344835 | Allen et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6421022 | Patenaude et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6828949 | Harless | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6930654 | Schmid et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6956696 | Hachkowski et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
20040196207 | Schefter et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20080068283 | Sankela et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090213031 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100018026 | Bassily | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
920530 | Mar 1963 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130069849 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |