The field of the invention is creating new fractures in previously fractured boreholes in locations offset from the existing fractures.
Wells that have been initially perforated and then the perforations fractures eventually experience a falloff in production or start to produce sand, water or other undesirable materials. In an effort to salvage additional production from such wells, past techniques have involved sealing off the perforations and perforating the borehole wall in other locations. The plugging of the existing perforations was done with chemicals that get into the perforations and solidify or harden to close them off. The problem with such systems is the uncertainty of distribution of the material which could leave some of the existing perforations open. Another way of closing the existing perforations is to have adjacent sliding sleeves that could be moved with a shifting tool to close the existing perforations. Some issues with this method are high initial cost, the cost of the trip to operate the sleeves and the uncertainty of whether the sleeves will actually shift to a closed position or get hung up on spurs or burrs caused by the original perforating. Other ideas have included sleeve placement over existing perforations but such a method has associated costs of placing the sleeves and some uncertainties that the placement location will cover the intended perforations and even if there is coverage of the intended perforations whether the cover will be effective as a seal to close off such openings.
The uncertainties of past methods are addressed by the present invention where a string of isolators straddles the existing perforations and where no openings in the mandrel between the isolators are to be found. In this manner the existing perforations are effectively isolated so that new perforations can be made by then perforating from within the mandrel and through the isolators to open new perforations that remain isolated from the existing perforations by virtue of the fact that the new perforations were started through the isolators. The bottom hole assembly can be delivered on coiled tubing or rigid pipe and can feature an anchor to prevent axial shifting due to borehole thermal effects. Such shifting could result in closing of the newly made perforations. An alternative way to address axial shifting is to provide internal spaces in each seal assembly so that even if there is axial shifting after firing there will still be enough new perforations aligned with such spaces in the barrier element so that adequate flow rates can be obtained without undue pressure drop.
Perforating through cement inflatable packers for initial well production has been discussed in Suman USRE 30711.
The above described features and others will be more readily apparent from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment and the associated drawings while recognizing that the full scope of the invention can be determined from the appended claims.
A well with existing perforations is re-fractured by positioning isolators at locations offset from the existing perforations and perforating through those isolators. The isolators are part of a bottom hole assembly that can be delivered on coiled or rigid tubing. The initial fractures can be straddled by the isolators with no mandrel openings between them to effectively isolate the existing perforations as new perforations take place through the isolators. The elements of the isolators can have internal gaps to allow for axial shifting after perforation that is thermally induced. The gaps assure remaining alignment with the new perforations despite some axial shifting. The bottom hole assembly can alternatively have an anchor to resist thermally induced forces that can cause axial shifting.
Those skilled in the art will now appreciate that the perforating through the isolators will allow the new perforations to be in direct communication with the mandrel for the isolator so that production or injection can take place with the existing perforations isolated. The fracturing of the new perforations preferably takes place with the existing perforations isolated. However, after such fracturing the original perforations can be reopened with sliding sleeves in the mandrel for the isolators or by further perforating or by other methods to open access to the original perforations. It is preferred to isolate the original perforation during the fracturing of the new perforations so that all the fracturing fluid can go where most needed into the new perforations. The isolators can be anchored against thermally induced forces that can shift the already perforated isolator elements from the freshly made formation perforations. Alternatively the axial movement can be tolerated and the element for the isolators can be built with enough gaps that are presented in a repeating or random spacing pattern so that even after shooting through the solid portions of the isolator and tolerating later shifting of the isolator in an axial direction there will still be open paths to the formation perforations through the left open portions of the isolator. The open portions of the isolator are preferably internal to the isolator assembly so that if there is axial shifting and flow though the isolated openings in the element that there will be portions of the element to define closed paths to the newly made perforations.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3062294 | Huitt | Nov 1962 | A |
5273115 | Spafford | Dec 1993 | A |
20130118750 | Gu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130146291 | O'Malley | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130186625 | O'Malley | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20150000936 | Nguy | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2013154727 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150354334 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |