This invention relates generally to air conditioning systems and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for determining proper refrigerant charge in such systems.
Maintaining proper refrigerant charge level is essential to the safe and efficient operation of an air conditioning system. Improper charge level, either in deficit or in excess, can cause premature compressor failure. An over-charge in the system results in compressor flooding, which, in turn, may be damaging to the motor and mechanical components. Inadequate refrigerant charge can lead to increased power consumption, thus reducing system capacity and efficiency. Low charge also causes an increase in refrigerant temperature entering the compressor, which may cause thermal over-load of the compressor. Thermal over-load of the compressor can cause degradation of the motor winding insulation, thereby bringing about premature motor failure.
Charge adequacy has traditionally been checked using either the “superheat method” or “subcool method”. For air conditioning systems which use a thermal expansion valve (TXV), or an electronic expansion valve (EXV), the superheat of the refrigerant entering the compressor is normally regulated at a fixed value, while the amount of subcooling of the refrigerant exiting the condenser varies. Consequently, the amount of subcooling is used as an indicator for charge level. Manufacturers often specify a range of subcool values for a properly charged air conditioner. For example, a subcool temperature range between 10 and 15° F. is generally regarded as acceptable in residential cooling equipment. For air conditioning systems that use fixed orifice expansion devices instead of TXVs (or EXVs), the performance of the air conditioner is much more sensitive to refrigerant charge level. Therefore, superheat is often used as an indicator for charge in these types of systems. A manual procedure specified by the manufacturer is used to help the installer to determine the actual charge based on either the superheat or subcooling measurement. Table 1 summarizes the measurements required for assessing the proper amount of refrigerant charge.
To facilitate the superheat method, the manufacturer provides a table containing the superheat values corresponding to different combinations of indoor return air wet bulb temperatures and outdoor dry bulb temperatures for a properly charged system. This charging procedure is an empirical technique by which the installer determines the charge level by trial-and-error. The field technician has to look up in a table to see if the measured superheat falls in the correct ranges specified in the table. Often the procedure has to be repeated several times to ensure the superheat stays in a correct range specified in the table. Consequently this is a tedious test procedure, and difficult to apply to air conditioners of different makers, or even for equipment of the same maker where different duct and piping configurations are used. In addition, the calculation of superheat or subcool requires the measurement of compressor suction pressure, which requires intrusive penetration of pipes.
In the subcooling method, as with the superheat method, the manufacturer provides a table listing the liquid line temperature required as a function of the amount of subcooling and the liquid line pressure. Once again, the field technician has to look up in the table provided to see if the measured liquid line temperature falls within the correct ranges specified in the table. Thus, this charging procedure is also an empirical, time-consuming, and a trial-and-error process.
Briefly, in accordance with one aspect of the invention, a simple and inexpensive refrigerant charge inventory indication method and apparatus using temperature measurements only is provided for an air conditioning system.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the condensing liquid line and outdoor temperatures are sensed and representative electrical signals are generated. The signals are converted to digital form and sent to a CPU for comparison with stored values determined empirically in advance. On the basis of these comparisons, an appropriate LED is activated to indicate whether the system is properly or improperly charged with refrigerant.
By yet another aspect of the invention, in addition to the condensing liquid line temperature and outdoor temperature, the return air temperature is also sensed and a representative electrical signal generated and converted to a digital signal for comparison with the stored values by the CPU. This additional step is preferred for use in non-TXV/EXV systems.
By still another aspect of the invention, the sensed temperatures may be automatically converted to representative electrical signals, or as an alternative, the temperatures may be sensed by stand alone instruments, with the temperatures being dialed in by an operator to obtain representative electrical signals.
In the drawings as hereinafter described, preferred and alternative embodiments are depicted; however, various other modifications and alternate constructions can be made thereto without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Referring now to
In operation, the refrigerant flowing through the evaporator 14 absorbs the heat in the indoor air being passed over the evaporator coil by the evaporator fan 16, with the cooled air than being circulated back into the indoor air to be cooled. After evaporation, the refrigerant vapor is pressurized in the compressor 11 and the resulting high-pressure vapor is condensed into liquid refrigerant at the condenser 12, which rejects the heat in the refrigerant to the outdoor air being circulated over the condenser coil 12 by way of the condenser fan 17. The condensed refrigerant is than expanded by way of an expansion device 13, after which the saturated refrigerant liquid enters the evaporator 14 to continue the cooling process.
In a heat pump, during cooling mode, the process is identical to that as described hereinabove. In the heating mode, the cycle is reversed with the condenser and evaporator of the cooling mode acting as an evaporator and condenser, respectively.
It should be mentioned that the expansion device 13 may be a valve such as a TXV or an EXV which regulates the amount of liquid refrigerant entering the evaporator 14 in response to the superheat condition of the refrigerant entering the compressor 11. It may also be a fixed orifice, such as a capillary tube or the like.
In accordance with the present invention, there are only two measured variables needed for assessing the charge level in a TXV/EXV based air conditioning system. These measured variables are liquid line temperature Tliquid and outdoor temperature Toutdoor which are measured by sensors S1 and S2, respectively. These temperature sensors are thermocouples, thermistors, or the like, and the sensed temperatures are processed in a manner to be described hereinafter.
In a non-TXV/EXV system a third parameter is sensed i.e. the return air wet bulb temperature, which is indicative of the humidity. This temperature is processed along with the other two sensed temperatures as will be more fully described hereinafter.
Referring now to
In addition to the voltage signal representative of the liquid line temperature, a voltage signal is also sent to the A/D converter 21 to represent the sensed outdoor temperature TOD. In its simplest form, a technician or operator may measure the outdoor temperature using a commercially available thermometer and manually adjust the present device in order to send the representative voltage signal to the A/D converter 21. This is accomplished by manually adjusting the knob 23 (see
After the electrical signals representative of the sensed liquid line temperature TL and to the outdoor temperature TOD have been converted to digital values by the A/D converter 21 and sent to the CPU 22, the CPU compares the representative digital values with known stored values in a read only memory (ROM) 25 or other storage device to determine whether the system is adequately charged with refrigerant. As a result of the comparison the CPU 22 will send an electrical signal to the appropriate one of the three LEDs so as to light one of the three indicators 27, 28 or 29 indicating that the system is undercharged, properly charged or overcharged, respectively. The operator can then take whatever action is necessary in order to bring the system into a properly charged condition.
In non-TXV/EXV systems, a third parameter is required in order to obtain a meaningful determination as to the adequacy of the refrigerant charge in a system. This third parameter is the indoor or return air wet bulb temperature TWB that can be obtained by a technician or operator using a commercially available humidity sensor. This value is inputted into the device by way of the knob 31 which is selectively moved to a position so as to set the variable resistor 32 such that, when the DC voltage is applied, across the variable resistor 32 and a fixed resistor 33 it causes, a specific voltage will be produced to represent the return air wet bulb temperature TWB that has been sensed. Again, the resulting electrical signal is sent to the A/D converter 21 and a representative digital value is sent to the CPU 22 for processing. Again, the resulting value is applied by the CPU 22 to send an appropriate signal to one of the three LEDs so as to light the appropriate indicator 27, 28 or 29.
The device as described hereinabove, which relies on an operator using standalone sensors and then manually inputting the resulting temperatures into the device, is a simple low cost approach to obtain an indication of refrigerant charge adequacy in a system. However, an alternative is for the temperature and/or humidity sensors to be built-in as an integral part of the system such that electrical signals representative of those temperatures can automatically be sent directly to the A/D converter 21 and processed as described hereinabove. In such case, the knobs 23 and 31 and their associated circuitry would not be required. This latter approach would be difficult to implement in older systems existing in the field since the cost would probably not be commercially feasible.
In the implementation of the present invention in diagnosing charge adequacy in an air conditioning system, a parameter defined as the approach temperature (APT) is used. In a cooling system, the condenser APT is defined as the difference in temperature between the inlet air temperature (i.e. the outdoor air temperature TOD) and the refrigerant temperature exiting the condenser (TL), or APT=TL−TOD.
The APT is affected by a number of variables including indoor air condition (i.e. dry bulb air temperature and relative humidity) and outdoor temperature.
If a system is significantly undercharged its operation becomes unstable and the present method and apparatus is not likely to be successfully used. However, when a typical cooling system is newly installed, the unit would normally be charged to a point at or near the optimal point A as shown in
If a map or table is available that characterizes optimal APTs for various indoor/outdoor conditions, then such a map can be used to charge a system to its optimal point. Such a map is shown in
It was recognized that at low outdoor temperature, the relationship between charge and APT is well defined under different outdoor conditions. When indoor temperatures (Tid) are fixed the indoor relative humidity (RH) affects the APT at all charge conditions. In the real environment, indoor temperatures can, of course, vary significantly. Since the combination of dry bulb temperature and relative humidity is reflected in the wet bulb measurements, the indoor wet bulb temperature, as well as the outdoor temperature is essential in evaluating the charge in a non-TXV/EXV system.
The data shown in
While the present description relates to a charge map for a particular manufacturers make and model of an air conditioning unit, the charge map for other manufacturers units of many makes and models can be stored in the ROM 25 with additional user input, preferably by menu selection, to choose the appropriate charge map.
In addition to the charge map, the ROM 25 also has a diagnostic algorithm stored therein for purposes of automatically stepping through the process of charge diagnostics. The diagnostic algorithm is shown in
At block 41, the outdoor temperature TOD is sensed by an operator and manually set into the apparatus by turning the appropriate knob 23 of the diagnostic apparatus. If the system is a non-TXV/EXV system, the operator is also required to sense the indoor wet bulb temperature Twb and input that data into the device by way of the knob 31 as shown in block 42. Of course, the charge map for the particular unit has already been stored in the ROM as shown at block 43. With inputs from blocks 41, 42, and 43, the optimal APT for the unit is determined at block 44.
In the meantime, as shown at block 46, the liquid line temperature TL has been automatically measured by the device and the APT is calculated at block 47 by subtracting the outdoor temperature TOD from the liquid line temperature TL.
The next step, which occurs at block 48, compares the computed APT from block 47 with the optimal APT as determined in block 44. If the actual APT exceeds the optimal APT by over a specified range, e.g. 2°, than the unit under test is deemed undercharged and an indication will be given that refrigerant charge needs to be added as shown in block 49. If, on the other hand, the actual APT is less than the optimal APT by a predetermined range, e.g. 2°, than the unit will be diagnosed as overcharged and an indication will be given that refrigerant charge needs to be removed from the system as shown in block 51. The process than continues until the measured APT is close to the optimal APT as indicated in block 52, in which case an indication is then provided that a correct charge condition has been reached as shown at block 53.
For each of the blocks 49, 51 and 53, the indication that is given to the operator is the lighting of the appropriate LED as described hereinabove. From those indications, the operator than proceeds appropriately until the proper charge is obtained.
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment as illustrated in the drawings, it will be understood by one skilled in the art that various changes in detail may be effected therein without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims. In particular, the present invention includes the equivalence of software and hardware in digital computing and the equivalence of digital and analog hardware in producing a particular signal indicative of charge
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4114448 | Merritt | Sep 1978 | A |
4304126 | Yelke | Dec 1981 | A |
4325223 | Cantley | Apr 1982 | A |
4381549 | Stamp et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4429578 | Darrel et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4510576 | MacArthur et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4541284 | Guagliumi et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4561261 | Kornrumpf et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4624112 | Proctor | Nov 1986 | A |
4745519 | Breidegam | May 1988 | A |
4798055 | Murray et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4805416 | Manz et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4841734 | Torrence | Jun 1989 | A |
4856288 | Weber | Aug 1989 | A |
4982576 | Proctor et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5016472 | Amrhein et al. | May 1991 | A |
5046322 | Bulla et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5057965 | Wilson | Oct 1991 | A |
5079930 | Beaverson et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5156012 | Kuribara et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5186012 | Czachorski et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5206963 | Wiens | May 1993 | A |
5214918 | Oguni et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5228304 | Ryan | Jul 1993 | A |
H1226 | VanReene et al. | Sep 1993 | H |
5241833 | Ohkoshi | Sep 1993 | A |
5248168 | Chichester et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5251453 | Stanke et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5295360 | Olds et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5317903 | McClelland et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5341649 | Nevitt et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5354103 | Torrence et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5362530 | Kitami et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374084 | Potokar | Dec 1994 | A |
5381669 | Bahel et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5406980 | Allread et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413147 | Moreiras et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423189 | Nicol et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425558 | Dennany, Jr. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430692 | Grupp et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5463377 | Kronberg | Oct 1995 | A |
5464042 | Haunhorst | Nov 1995 | A |
5468028 | Olson | Nov 1995 | A |
5474336 | Hoff et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5540463 | Potokar | Jul 1996 | A |
5694778 | Wilson | Dec 1997 | A |
5752726 | Fixemer | May 1998 | A |
5807332 | Augustine et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5834943 | Miller | Nov 1998 | A |
5868437 | Teague | Feb 1999 | A |
5961157 | Baron et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6012743 | Godeau et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6045742 | McGrevy | Apr 2000 | A |
6155612 | Szabo | Dec 2000 | A |
6161394 | Alsenz | Dec 2000 | A |
6179214 | Key et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6302654 | Millet et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308523 | Scaringe | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324854 | Jayanth | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330802 | Cummings et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6354332 | Burkhardt et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
8382678 | Field of al. | May 2002 | |
6442953 | Trigiani et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460354 | Yabuki et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6470695 | Gong | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6481756 | Field et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6497435 | Luft et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6546823 | Veit | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6550341 | van Schoor et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6553774 | Ishio et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571566 | Temple et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594554 | Seem et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6658373 | Rossi et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6758051 | Jayanth et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6769258 | Pierson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6868678 | Mei et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7079967 | Rossi et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
20020024218 | Manuli | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020096209 | Danielson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020121100 | Yabuki et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020139128 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020141877 | Jayanth et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020182005 | Milhas | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030089119 | Pham et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030158704 | Triginai et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172665 | Matsuoka et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182950 | Mei et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030226367 | Palmer et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050235755 | Hindman | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 159 281 | May 1990 | EP |
0 308 160 | Jun 1991 | EP |
0 453 302 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0 289 369 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 396 029 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0 550 263 | Jul 1993 | EP |
0 409 000 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0 529 758 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 760 069 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0 843 794 | May 1998 | EP |
0 918 182 | May 1999 | EP |
1 238 838 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1 337 825 | Aug 2003 | EP |
2667570 | Apr 1992 | FR |
2 274 695 | Aug 1994 | GB |
62-218748 | Sep 1987 | JP |
62-261845 | Nov 1987 | JP |
63-302238 | Dec 1988 | JP |
2-110268 | Apr 1990 | JP |
2-195165 | Aug 1990 | JP |
4-55671 | Feb 1992 | JP |
4-190062 | Jul 1992 | JP |
4-273941 | Sep 1992 | JP |
5-99475 | Apr 1993 | JP |
5-231754 | Sep 1993 | JP |
5-256543 | Oct 1993 | JP |
7-55299 | Mar 1995 | JP |
8-68576 | Mar 1996 | JP |
8-261542 | Oct 1996 | JP |
8-261543 | Oct 1996 | JP |
2000-9048 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000-154954 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001-32884 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-141279 | May 2001 | JP |
WO 9320376 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO 9530106 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9530107 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9533157 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9617202 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9712167 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9713994 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9713995 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9747908 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 0045053 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0123794 | Apr 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060137370 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |