This invention relates generally to refrigeration systems and, more particularly, to refrigeration systems comprising a compressor, a condenser and an evaporator.
Refrigeration systems comprising a compressor, a condenser and an evaporator come in a wide variety of configurations. The most common of these configurations is generally termed a “direct expansion system.” In a direct expansion system, a refrigerant vapor is pressurized in the compressor, liquified in the condenser and allowed to revaporize in the evaporator and then flowed back to the compressor.
In direct expansion systems, the amount of superheat in the refrigerant vapor exiting the evaporator is almost exclusively used as a control parameter. Direct expansion systems operate with approximately 20% to 30% of the evaporator in the dry condition to develop superheat. A problem with this control method is that superheat control is negatively effected by close temperature differences, wide fin spacing or pitch, light loads and water content. The evaporator must be 20% to 30% larger for equivalent surface to be available. Also, superheat control does not perform well in low-temperature systems, such as systems using ammonia or similar refrigerant, wherein the evaporator temperatures are about 0° F.
An additional disadvantage of the superheat control method is that it tends to result in excessive inlet flashing. Such inlet flashing results in pressure drop and instability transfer within the evaporator, and results in the forcible expansion of liquid out of the distal ends of the evaporator coils. Also, this control method is especially problematic when the refrigerant is ammonia or other low-temperature refrigerant, because so much liquid refrigerant is typically expelled from the evaporator to require the use of large liquid traps downstream of the evaporator. Thus, in all superheat controlled expansion systems, negative compromises are necessarily made in efficiency and capacity.
Accordingly, there is a need for a refrigeration system which eliminates the aforementioned problems in the prior art.
The invention satisfies this need. The invention is a system for cooling a refrigerant comprising: (a) an evaporator comprising one or more lengths of tubing each having an upstream first cross-sectional area and a second downstream cross-sectional area, the second cross-sectional area being greater than the first cross-sectional area, the expansion in cross-sectional area between the first circular cross-sectional area and the second circular cross-sectional area being smooth and continuous; and (b) a compressor and a condenser for converting the refrigerant from a gas to a liquid for introduction into the evaporator.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description, appended claims and accompanying drawings where:
The following discussion describes in detail one embodiment of the invention and several variations of that embodiment. This discussion should not be construed, however, as limiting the invention to those particular embodiments. Practitioners skilled in the art will recognize numerous other embodiments as well.
As noted above, the invention is a method of controlling a refrigeration system, wherein the refrigeration system comprises a refrigerant disposed within a fluid-tight circulation loop including a compressor, a condenser and an evaporator, the refrigerant being capable of existing in a liquified state, a gaseous state and a two-phase state comprising both refrigerant in the liquified state and refrigerant in the gaseous state, the evaporator having an upstream section with an inlet opening and a downstream section with an outlet opening, the method comprising (a) compressing refrigerant in a gaseous state within the compressor and cooling the refrigerant within the condenser to yield refrigerant in a liquified state; (b) flowing the refrigerant in a liquified state into the evaporator; (c) reducing the pressure of the refrigerant within the evaporator to yield refrigerant in a two-phase state; (d) reducing the pressure of the refrigerant in a two-phase state within the evaporator to yield a refrigerant in a gaseous state; (e) flowing refrigerant in a gaseous state from the evaporator to the compressor; (f) repeating steps (a)-(e); and (g) controlling the flow of refrigerant in a liquid state to the evaporator in step (b) based upon the condition of the refrigerant within the evaporator upstream of the outlet opening.
Typically, the controlling of the flow of refrigerant in a liquid state to the evaporator in step (g) is based upon the quality of the refrigerant within the evaporator. That is, the controlling of the flow of refrigerant in a liquid state to the evaporator is based upon the ratio of the volume of vapor to the volume of liquid in the refrigerant. Quality can be determined by directly measuring vapor-to-liquid volume ratios. Quality can also be determined by many other means known in the art, including capacitance, heating element corresponding current draw, calibrated mass flow sensors and vortex flow sensors.
In embodiments directly measuring two-phase volume to liquid injection volume ratios, one to three measuring points are typically employed, at least one of them preferably being at an intermediate point within the evaporator. As used herein, the term “intermediate point” is a point within the evaporator, downstream of the inlet opening a distance encompassing 50-90% of the total evaporator circuit length, typically 60%-80% of the evaporator circuit length. In many applications, a plurality of spaced-apart intermediate points can be used in measuring the two-phase volume-to-liquid injection volume ratios.
Where quality of the refrigerant is determined by measurement at a single point, that single point is preferably a single intermediate point. After measurement at the intermediate point, it is often advantageous for the controller to extrapolate from the value sensed at the intermediate point to approximate the liquid feed rate required to wet at least most of the entire surface.
Where quality of the refrigerant is determined by measurement at a pair of intermediate points, the controller typically interpolates between the values sensed at the intermediate points to establish the desired feed rate to wet at least most of the entire core surface.
Where quality of the refrigerant is determined by measurements at three points, the three points preferably include measurement at two intermediate points. The third “measurement point” is one or more parameters regarding the evaporator outlet or, preferably, of the feed stream of liquid refrigerant to the evaporator—such as volume or mass flow rate. By use of such three measurement control methods, the controller can take proactive steps in controlling liquid feed rate to the evaporator before entry of refrigerant to the evaporator coils. Feed rate can be governed so as to not overshoot a predetermined range. Also, the incoming feed rate, together with the intermediate point and outlet point measurements, allow the control system to differentiate between large and small loads. This is important because the intermediate point measurement value can vary with varying feed rates.
The controller can also use input regarding vapor quality to control the flow of refrigerant to the evaporator. Vapor quality can be determined by various methods known in the art, including void fraction determination, capacitance, specially calibrated mass flow sensors, heating element based refrigeration quality sensors, etc.
Exit vapor temperature measurement can also be used by the controller to control the flow of refrigerant to the evaporator. This means it is superheat controlled direct expansion.
Controlling the flow of refrigerant to the evaporator in the above-described manner allows the controller to modulate liquid injection to the evaporator such that the entire internal surface to be wetted with very little refrigerant mass, and such that virtually no refrigerant liquid evaporation occurs outside the evaporator.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, refrigerant in a liquified state from step (a) is precooled prior to being flowed into the evaporator in step (b). Typically, refrigerant in a liquified state from step (a) is precooled to near its boiling point, such as between 0° F. and 60° F. of its boiling point at the pressure of the refrigerant at the inlet opening of the evaporator, preferably between 0° F. and 30° F. of its boiling point at the pressure of the refrigerant at the inlet opening of the evaporator and most preferably between 0° F. and 5° F.
The value of precooling the refrigerant to the evaporator stems from the reduction or elimination of flash vapor at the evaporator inlet. Reducing flash vapor at the evaporator inlet stabilizes and makes more uniform the expansion of the refrigerant after entry into the evaporator. Between 15% and 30% or more of the refrigeration load in an evaporator of non-precooled refrigeration systems is flash gas. Such flash gas decreases evaporator efficiency and tends to blow liquid out of the outlet opening of the evaporator.
Moreover, efficiency of the overall cycle is significantly increased in precooled refrigerant systems through the removal of a superheat requirement. Still further, particularly within ammonia systems, the evaporator surface required in the evaporator is significantly reduced by use of a precooler. Yet still further, pressure drop across the evaporator inlet opening is typically reduced by as much as about 20% in precooled refrigeration systems. Thus, the combination of the above benefits allows refrigeration systems having a precooler to operate more consistently, dependably and efficiently than refrigeration systems having no precooler. Disposing the precooler internally is an important option in the invention. External precooling (using precooling systems and feed control systems disposed exterior of the evaporator) is known in the prior art. With internal precooling accomplished at or after the intermediate point, excess liquid in the two-phase flow is eliminated, thus balancing the overall flow while maintaining the precooling benefits.
In one embodiment of the invention, refrigerant in a liquified state from step (a) is conveniently precooled by thermal contact with refrigerant flowing within the evaporator past an intermediate sampling location.
In many applications, it may be preferable to configure one or more of the lengths of tubing within the evaporator, most preferably, each length of tubing within the evaporator, with an expanding cross-section. Typically, the expansion of the cross-section is smooth and continuous.
As noted above, prior art ammonia refrigeration systems typically require suction accumulators to catch liquid carryover from the evaporator. The method of the invention, on the other hand, is capable of controlling the feed so accurately the feed rate to the evaporator so accurately that such suction accumulators can be markedly reduced in size or eliminated altogether.
The invention is also a refrigeration system used in the method of the invention. The refrigeration system 10 comprises (a) a fluid tight circulation loop 12 including a compressor 14, a condenser 16 and an evaporator 18, the circulation loop 12 being configured to continuously circulate a refrigerant which is capable of existing in a liquified state, a gaseous state and a two-phase state comprising both refrigerant in the liquified state and refrigerant in the gaseous state, the evaporator 18 having an upstream section 20 with an inlet opening 22 and a downstream section 24 with an outlet opening 26, the circulation loop 12 being further configured to (i) compress refrigerant in a gaseous state within the compressor 14 and cool the refrigerant in the condenser 16 to yield refrigerant in a liquified state; (ii) flow the refrigerant in a liquified state into the evaporator 18; (iii) reduce the pressure of the refrigerant within the evaporator 18 to yield refrigerant in a two-phase state; (iv) reduce the pressure of the refrigerant in a two-phase state within the evaporator 18 to yield a refrigerant in a gaseous state; (v) flow refrigerant in a gaseous state from the evaporator 18 to the compressor 14; and (vi) repeat steps (i)-(v); and (b) a controller 27 for controlling the flow of refrigerant in a liquid state to the evaporator 18 based upon the condition of the refrigerant within the evaporator 18, upstream of the outlet opening 26.
An example of the refrigeration system 10 of the invention is illustrated in
In the embodiment illustrated in
Also in the embodiment illustrated in
In the refrigeration system 10 illustrated in
In the evaporator 18 illustrated in
Most commonly, the fluid to be cooled is a gas, typically air. However, liquid fluids to be cooled can also be employed in the invention, such as, but not limited to, water, brine, liquified carbon dioxide and glycol-water solutions.
The most straightforward method of controlling the flow of liquid refrigerant to the evaporator 18 in the refrigeration system 10 of the invention is a single point measurement method wherein the single point is taken at an intermediate point of one or more representative circuits. Control of all circuits 48 is then based on these readings. As noted above, an attractive option, particularly for low-temperature and larger applications, is combining intermediate point refrigerant condition measurements with evaporator inlet flow rate. Whichever method is selected, exit vapor condition is typically also measured.
As illustrated in
In
In conventional evaporators 18 comprising a plurality of circuits 48 disposed in parallel, control of flow of refrigerant in a liquid state to the evaporator 18 is based upon the condition of the refrigerant in one or more representative circuits 48 within the evaporator 18.
In the embodiment illustrated in
Advantages of the embodiment illustrated in
As noted above, in many applications, it may be preferable to configure one or more lengths of the circuit tubing 78 within the evaporator 18—most preferably, each length of circuit tubing 78 within the evaporator 18—with an expanding cross-section. Typically, such expansion of the cross-section is smooth and continuous. For example, the evaporator 18 can have one or more lengths of circuit tubing 78 with a first, upstream cross-sectional area and a second, downstream cross-sectional area—the second cross-sectional area being greater than the first cross-sectional area.
In systems comprising expanded evaporator circuits 48, “accelerator” and “preferred velocity” zones are defined in the evaporator 18 which typically include the initial several passes of the evaporator 18. Tube IDs begin comparatively small and increase in size progressively until the maximum ID is reached. Beginning liquid volume to internal surface area in these zones is favorable, even at low temperatures. Puddling and overfeed are virtually eliminated. Design velocities enable vapor-to-liquid ratios and direct vapor quality measurements to be made with relative accuracy. The use of such zones applies to standard OD tubes, mini-tubes, mini-channels and other type exchangers. Refrigeration redistribution, combined with intermediate vapor condition measurements, may be applied with fixed internal cross-section exchangers and larger, more conventional units.
A theoretical example of the use of the refrigerant system is provided as follows:
Evaporator outlet suction vapor at a pressure of about 3.25 psig travels to the compressor. The pressure of the evaporator outlet suction is sensed by the pressure transducer. After being compressed to a higher pressure of about 150 psig in the compressor, the vapor is supplied to the condenser through the high-pressure conduit. The high-pressure vapor is condensed in the condenser, typically using cooling tower water. Warm, high-pressure liquid of about 84° F. is supplied from the condenser via the high-pressure conduit to the precooler wherein the liquid refrigerant is cooled to about −17° F.
Precooled liquid at the pressure of the precooled liquid leaving the precooler is sensed by the pressure transducer. The temperature of the precooled liquid leaving the precooler is sensed by the temperature sensor. The liquid volume flow rate is measured by the liquid volume meter 40. The feed rate to the evaporator is modulated by the motor operated control valve. The liquid feed nozzles assure uniform liquid feed rates to any number of evaporator circuits. Little or no flash vapor is generated between the liquid feed modulating valve and the feed nozzles.
Liquid enters the evaporator coil and flows into the first of a number of accelerator zones or passes. The refrigerant within the evaporator boils at a temperature of about −20° F. producing a comparatively large amount of vapor as compared to the liquid volume. The initial pass of the evaporator has a small internal diameter. Liquid volume to the internal surface area of this initial pass is favorable for full wetting of the surface and for good heat transfer. Following accelerator and preferred velocity zones or passes having progressively larger internal diameters. Under load, two-phase liquid and vapor flow accelerates to the desired flow regime. It is noted that liquid flash vapor is reduced in the flow, and the design flow velocity is developed with very little volume and with reasonable pressure drop. At the intermediate or later portion of the circuit, the two-phase flow moves into the mist flow regime.
The flow from any number of circuits move into the intermediate header with the precooling heat exchanger, wherein it cools the warm liquid from the condenser. The entire two-phase evaporating flow leaves the intermediate header and moves to the redistribution header. At an intermediate point, two-phase quality is measured. Two-phase flow leaving the redistribution header travels uniformly to all circuits and at least one remaining pass, wherein the mist burns out forming single-phase vapor flow at the outlet of the evaporator. The evaporator outlet vapor volume is measured by a suction vapor sensor. The controller receives input signal from the volume sensors, pressure transducers and temperature sensor. Vapor quality at the intermediate point is calculated and the liquid feed control is given feed control commands to match the amount of liquid required for the evaporator to operate with fully wetted internal surface and with no liquid remaining at the outlet.
Having thus described the invention, it should be apparent that numerous structural modifications and adaptations may be resorted to without departing from the scope and fair meaning of the instant invention as set forth hereinabove and as described hereinbelow by the claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/312,706, filed on Dec. 6, 2011, and titled “Refrigeration System Controlled by Refrigerant Quality Within Evaporator,” which application is hereby expressly incorporated herein by this reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2707868 | Goodman | May 1955 | A |
2758447 | Prosek | Aug 1956 | A |
3041843 | Swearingen et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
3167930 | Block et al. | Feb 1965 | A |
3170302 | Potito | Feb 1965 | A |
4089368 | Bell, Jr. et al. | May 1978 | A |
4290272 | Vakil | Sep 1981 | A |
4370868 | Kim | Feb 1983 | A |
4484452 | Houser, Jr. | Nov 1984 | A |
4510576 | MacArthur | Apr 1985 | A |
4577468 | Nunn et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4683726 | Barron | Aug 1987 | A |
4901533 | Fan et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5050400 | Lammert | Sep 1991 | A |
5139548 | Liu et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5243837 | Radermacher | Sep 1993 | A |
5507340 | Alston | Apr 1996 | A |
6026804 | Schardt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6138919 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6199401 | Haussmann | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6923011 | Manole | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7000413 | Chen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7841208 | Lefor | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8069682 | Yoshimi | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8646286 | Scherer et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8677779 | Lambert | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20020078699 | Vogel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030041610 | Shirota | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040261435 | Chen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060117767 | Mowris | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060225460 | Marques | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070084594 | Higashiyama | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070125120 | Marques | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080314064 | Al-Eidan | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100132399 | Mitra et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100229579 | Knight et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20130086930 | Scherer et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130133868 | Lehar et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140123696 | Kim et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150226472 | Scherer | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2158899 | Mar 1996 | CA |
2497245 | Jun 2002 | CN |
3600075 | Jul 1986 | DE |
19719251 | Nov 1998 | DE |
103 11 343 | Sep 2004 | DE |
2002286307 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2005291622 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2007198664 | Aug 2007 | JP |
335421 | Dec 2015 | MX |
2006112157 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2012092274 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2015120241 | Aug 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
CIPO, Office Action issued in related PDX Technologies Canadian Patent Application No. 2,862,159, dated Nov. 18, 2015, 4 pages. |
JPO, Office Action issued in related PDX Technologies Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-547612, dated Oct. 6, 2015, 6 pages. |
JPO, Second Office Action issued in related PDX Technologies Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-547612, dated May 31, 2016, 5 pages. |
KIPO, International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PDX Technologies related International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/014767, dated May 26, 2015, 14 pages. |
Man'O, Tatsunori et al., “Improvements of Heat Transfer and Refrigerant Distribution in Plate-Type Evaporator by Vapor Recirculation Using an Ejector,” The Smithsonian/NASA Astrophysics Data System, Jun. 3, 2014; http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011TRACE..24..401M, 1 page. |
Scherer, John S., U.S. Appl. No. 61/993,865 titled “Refrigeration System With Warming Feature” filed May 15, 2014. |
Scherer et al., U.S. Appl. No. 61/937,033 titled “Refrigeration System With Separate Feedstreams to Multiple Expanding Evaporator Zones” filed Feb. 7, 2014. |
Scherer et al., U.S. Appl. No. 61/428,576 titled “Refrigeration System” filed Dec. 30, 2010. |
WIPO/KIPO, International Preliminary Report on Patentability (IPRP) issued in related Scherer et al. International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/067390, dated Jul. 2, 2013, 5 pages. |
USPTO, First Office Action on the Merits issued in Scherer U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,706, dated Jun. 7, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 10, 2012 in PCT/US2011/067390. |
Australian Government, IP Australia, “Examination Report No. 1 for your Standard Patent Application,” dated Oct. 16, 2017 for Australian Application No. 2011352288, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Search Report for EP 15 74 6757 dated Aug. 17, 2016, 9 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report” dated Jul. 12, 2017 for PCT/US2011067390, 10 pages. |
European Patent Office, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Apr. 12, 2018 for Application No. 15 746 757.2-1008, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140157808 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13312706 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14161344 | US |