Refrigeration and liquefaction cycles with gas as the working fluid and sometimes also the process gas have been known since about 1900 and are well described in the technical literature. Essentially all of the these cycles operate on the principle of compressing a working gas, transferring the heat of compression to a heat sink, cooling the gas in a recuperative or regenerative heat exchanger, further cooling of the gas via either isenthalpic or isentropic expansion, transferring a thermal load into the working gas from a heat source, warming the lower pressure gas back to near the temperature of the compressor, and repeating the cycle. In cycles such as the Linde cycle, the cooled high-pressure gas is expanded isenthalphically in a Joule-Thomson valve with no work recovery. Cycles with no work recovery generally have low thermodynamic efficiency relative to the minimum work required to pump heat from a colder source to a warmer heat sink. The primary reason for such low efficiency is a fundamental limitation of poor heat transfer during rapid compression of a gas; rather than being isothermal, the process is adiabatic or nearly so via polytropic compression. This inefficiency causes significantly more work input per unit mass flow than the ideal isothermal process. Without recovery of any of this work input during a refrigeration cycle, the ratio of the cooling power to the rate of work input is much lower than the ideal ratio, i.e., low relative thermodynamic efficiency (e.g., a few percent out of 100%).
To improve refrigerator efficiency, gas expanders were invented whereby precooled high-pressure working gas is expanded isentropically from higher pressure to lower pressure with corresponding work production plus larger cooling effect. In refrigeration cycles that recover work of expansion to offset some input work of compression, the thermodynamic efficiency increases. Tagauchi et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,737,924 and Saho et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,147 describe use of regeneration to help recover some of the thermal energy of expansion of a portion of the working gas stream. Kolbinger describes an assembly of two rotary engines to form a compressor-expander with no discussion of recovery of work in U.S. Pat. No. 5,309,716. An electromagnetic apparatus to produce linear motion in a macro-structure device is described by Denne in U.S. Pat. No. 6,462,439, and a micro electro-mechanical system for providing cooling with compression and expansion spaces separated by a regenerator in a Stirling cycle without direct work recovery is described by Tsai et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 6,272,866. An array of refrigeration elements is disclosed by Reid et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 6,332,323. The refrigeration elements are combined to form a highly efficient active gas regenerative refrigerator. Refrigeration elements configured into an appropriate array of dual opposing thermal regenerators in an active regenerative refrigerator simultaneously enable the feature to alternatively provide active heating or cooling to reciprocating heat transfer fluid that flows over the outside surfaces of the refrigeration elements. The active heating or cooling in the opposite ends of small hermetic refrigeration elements can be caused by driving a sealed piston back and forth in each refrigeration element. The drive mechanisms contemplated in the '323 patent are by electromagnetic, pneumatic, or other means but few details are given. The array of refrigeration elements is configured to enable reciprocating heat transfer fluid motion, as in conventional passive regenerators in regenerative cycle refrigerators such as the Stirling, Gifford McMahon, or pulse-tube cryocoolers, but in active regenerative refrigerator, the heat transfer fluid is separate from the working fluid, and the heat transfer fluid is not compressed or expanded during its cycle, other than as required for flow through the refrigeration element array and external heat exchanger.
A small proof-of-concept active gas regenerative refrigerator was successfully built and initially tested with the support of a NASA Phase I small business innovation research SBIR award (J. A. Barclay, M. A. Barclay, W. Jakobsen, and M. P. Skrzypkowski, NASA SBIR Phase I Final Report, 2004; “Active Gas Regenerative Liquefier”; Contract No. NNJO4JC25C). Approximately 200 identical small stainless steel tubes were assembled into a rectangular array of tubes, each with a micro-regenerator and a common pressure wave means for all tubes in parallel. Initial results from the first lab prototype proved the active end of the tubes did heat and cool upon compression or expansion, respectively, and that the active gas regenerative concept was valid.
Embodiments relate to methods and apparatuses for work input with simultaneous work recovery in a refrigeration cycle by nearly isothermal polytropic compression and synchronous nearly isothermal polytropic expansion of a working gas. Embodiments of the invention relate to a basic thermal unit of an efficient refrigerator and more particularly to active gas regenerative refrigerators utilizing an array of directly coupled micro compressor-expander units (MCEUs) with electromagnetic or pneumatic mechanisms for producing linear reciprocating motion of a piston to cause simultaneous heating or cooling by compression and expansion of a working gas within the basic thermal unit. Embodiments generally relate to fabrication of apparatuses and methods to enable work input into each micro gas compressor region coupled with simultaneous work recovery from the micro gas expander region. The combined effect of a high-performance regenerator array of micro compressor-expander units creates an efficient active gas regenerative refrigeration cycle for transferring heat from a colder thermal source to a hotter thermal sink for numerous refrigeration applications including liquefying natural gas, hydrogen, helium or other gases.
Various embodiments provide work recovery of compression of an equal amount of working gas on one end of a MCEU tube by a common drive piston by simultaneous expansion of an equal amount of working gas on the opposite end of the common drive piston. The net driving force to move the piston alternatively inside the MCEU tube is provided by arrangements of permanent magnets and drive coils, in one embodiment of the invention.
According to an embodiment, the length of thermally active sections at each end of a MCEU remains constant by using radial compression and expansion of a helium (He) working gas. This overcomes limitations of previous designs that used bellows or axial movement of the working gas with changes in the geometry of thermally active regions of the MCEU during its operation.
According to an embodiment, radial motion of helium gas keeps a mass of He working gas constant in each thermally active section during the MCEU cycle. This overcomes one of the disadvantages of the NASA SBIR proof-of-principle prototype referenced above, of having different thermal mass in the thermally active sections at opposite ends of a MCEU by moving more or less working helium gas into or out of each MCEU during compression and expansion steps, respectively.
According to an embodiment, the Biot number of a He working gas and tube walls of a MCEU (e.g. 0.125″ outer diameter Al alloy 2024 T6 tubes with 0.003″ wall) is ˜10−3, so tube walls in thermally active sections of the MCEU change temperature almost synchronously with the He working gas during a nominal 1 Hz cycle. The tube walls become part of the active thermal mass of each MCEU during an active gas regenerative refrigeration cycle.
According to an embodiment, a drive piston of a MCEU has two or more sets of small opposing Nd2Fe14B magnets that create two or more concentrated transverse magnetic flux regions perpendicular to the axis of a center section of the MCEU tube. The MCEU also includes a thin, electrically-energizable coil around the outside of the center section of the MCEU. This arrangement significantly increases the Lorenz force on the drive piston from a magnetic field generated by the coil.
According to an embodiment, a piston of a MCEU has two or more sets of small opposing Nd2Fe14B magnets that create two or more concentrated transverse magnetic flux regions perpendicular to the axis of a center section of the MCEU tube. The MCEU also includes a thin, annular, cylindrically-shaped permanent magnet array which is closely fitted with low-friction seals inside a hermetic tubular enclosure around the center section of the MCEU. This annular permanent magnet array is pneumatically driven back and forth by pressurized gases such as N2 or He alternatively supplied to drive chambers defined in part by the tubular enclosure, via small tubes from a separate gas-supply subsystem. The transverse flux of the permanent magnets within the drive piston couples strongly with the cylindrically-shaped permanent magnet array. The strong magnetic flux coupling between the opposing magnets in the annular drive array and the magnets of the drive piston cause the drive piston to reciprocally move with the annular permanent magnet array, which simultaneously compresses and expands the working gas at respective ends of the piston during MCEU operation.
According to an embodiment, a hoop stress of thin-walled tubes of a MCEU array during maximum compression of a He working gas is only about ½ of the yield strength of MCEU tube materials such as Al 2024-T6. This enables good dimensional stability and good sealing in the MCEU.
According to an embodiment, a MCEU design enables work recovery from expansion of working gas at one end of the MCEU to offset work input to compress the working gas on an opposite end of the MCEU.
According to an embodiment, a magnetic drive is provided, including a hermetic pneumatic shell containing thin, cylindrical annular permanent magnets around the outer shell wall of a center section of a MCEU tube. The tube contains two or more sets of opposing permanent magnets in an axially moveable compressor/expander piston assembly within the MCEU, which increases the transverse magnetic flux and thereby increases the magnetic coupling between the permanent magnets in the piston and those in the pneumatic drive.
According to an embodiment, the work required for a cycle of a MCEU array is distributed over a wide range of temperatures near the operating temperature of each MCEU of the array, rather than input in a lumped fashion as through a compressor in most conventional gas cycle refrigerators and liquefiers.
According to an embodiment, electronic control of each MCEU of an array is provided, so the performance of an overall active regenerator that includes the array of MCEUs can be fine-tuned during cool-down, to permit compensation for variations in thermal loads from a process stream, to accommodate o-p conversion for hydrogen, and to compensate for performance degradation during long term operation. The hermetic nature of each MCEU provides highly reliable operation.
According to an embodiment, entropy changes required for heat flows in a dual-regenerator design of an active gas regenerative refrigerator (AGRR) come from simultaneous compression and expansion of working gas in each MCEU of an array. Heat flow through the dual regenerators on opposite thermally active ends of the array of MCEUs comes from the coupling of individual MCEUs of the array via a reciprocating flow of heat transfer fluid. The thermodynamic cycle of each MCEU is distinct, consisting of a polytropic compression and associated temperature increase, heat transfer to the heat transfer fluid with a corresponding small temperature and pressure decrease of the compressed working gas inside the MCEU, a polytropic expansion with an associated temperature decrease, and heat transfer from the heat transfer fluid with a corresponding small temperature and pressure increase in the expanded working gas. This combination of events creates a small unique thermodynamic cycle for each MCEU with corresponding heat flows at mean temperatures, TH and TC, and associated work input.
According to an embodiment, there is a recovery of compression work by direct coupling to an expansion at a slightly lower temperature in this cycle. If the heat transfer fluid through the dual regenerators is shut off, the net work input into a MCEU will drop to zero even though the working gas is being compressed and expanded on opposite ends of the MCEU (excluding frictional dissipation in the seal and Joule heating in the drive coils). This feature is difficult to do effectively in conventional gas cycle refrigerators and is one of the reasons that gross efficiencies of conventional gas refrigerators are so low relative to ideal. Turbo-expander units have been built for cryogenic Claude cycle refrigerators but the amount of work recovery is generally relatively small because the gas expansion is done at a temperature substantially different from the gas compression. Intrinsic work recovery to the extent allowed by a thermodynamic refrigeration cycle is one of the reasons that active gas regenerative refrigerators show promise of high efficiency. This is caused by the synchronous force balance in each MCEU. This very desirable feature is enabled by directly coupling the compression of the working gas at one end of each MCEU with the simultaneous expansion of the working gas at the other end of the same MCEU in identical dual regenerators. Accomplishing this coupling allows efficient distributed work input and work recovery from near ambient temperature to cryogenic temperatures as low as ˜4 K. By using this novel concept the net required work input for a given thermal load is reduced substantially no matter what the temperature span of the refrigerator or liquefier is. To the knowledge of the inventors, this input of “distributed net work” is unique among gas refrigerators.
According to an embodiment, the thermal mass of each active end of a MCEU of an array in dual regenerators are similar and provide the desirable feature of thermally-balanced regenerators, even with heat capacity variations of tubing material, piston material, drive mechanism, and working gas as a function of temperature.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof. In the drawings, similar symbols typically identify similar components, unless context dictates otherwise. The illustrative embodiments described in the detailed description, drawings, and claims are not meant to be limiting. Other embodiments may be utilized, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject matter presented here.
During the NASA SBIR project referred to above, several challenging design issues were identified which were beyond the scope of the project. Most of these issues were related to manufacturing individual refrigeration elements, each with means to synchronously drive reciprocating micro pistons in each element when the working helium gas is at sufficiently high pressures (several MPa), and at pressure ratios large enough to cause polytropic temperature changes of between 2 K and 20 K during compression or expansion. The electromagnetic-magnetic drive forces in the initial drive designs were small compared to the pressure forces on the piston from the He gas at the peak pressures in the MCEU cycle. These issues are reduced or overcome by various embodiments of the present invention.
A simple version of a single micro compressor-expander unit (MCEU) tube 100, according to an embodiment, is illustrated in
In
According to an embodiment, the thermally active regions of the MCEU 100 enable the execution of an active gas regenerative cycle in the thermally active sections 104, 106 of the MCEU 100. This cycle executed half a cycle out of phase at opposite active ends of the MCEU 100 consists of four steps; i) a polytropic compression with no transverse flow of a separate heat transfer fluid (HTF); ii) an isochoric (constant volume) step with cold-to-hot flow of HTF that causes the temperature and pressure of the compressed He working gas and the shell wall 114 in one end of the MCEU 100 to decrease by the temperature increase of the compressed end of the MCEU 100 while the HTF is heated; iii) a polytropic expansion with no HTF flow; and iv) an isochoric step with hot-to-cold flow of HTF that causes the temperature and pressure of the expanded He working gas in same end of the MCEU 100 and the shell wall 114 in the thermally active regions 104, 106 of the MCEU 100 to increase while the HTF is cooled.
The resultant force on the piston 110 in each MCEU 100 comes from the differential pressures in the opposite end sections of the MCEU pushing on the end area of the piston. The cooling power of each MCEU 100, the rejected heat rate, and the net work rate required to move the piston in each polytropic compression step of the MCEU cycle are a function of several design variables such as the mean MCEU operating temperature, temperature span, mean loading pressure of He working gas, diameter and wall thickness of the tube, the pressure ratio and corresponding polytropic temperature changes, etc. For example, in a system configured for liquefying natural gas, the polytropic exponent k changes from ˜1.04 at 290 K to ˜1.1 at 110 K (He alone has a value of 1.66). The inventors' calculations indicate excellent promise for fabrication of small-diameter, tubular, inexpensive MCEUs driven either electromagnetically, at lower temperatures, or pneumatically, at higher temperatures, such as may enable very efficient active gas regenerative refrigerators (AGRRs) and active gas regenerative liquefiers (AGRLs) to be built.
The cylindrical hermetic MCEU 100 illustrated in
To better explain the non-obviousness and usefulness of the MCEU, an analysis is provided, of a regenerative refrigeration cycle when an array of MCEUs is combined, in accordance with an embodiment of an active gas regenerative refrigerator (AGRR). The working gas cycle in each end section of an MCEU tube consists of four steps; i) a polytropic compression by moving the piston to the right with no transverse heat transfer fluid (HTF) flow of the AGRR; ii) an isochoric (constant volume) step with cold-to-hot flow of HTF around the MCEUs with thermal energy transfer from the MCEUs to the HTF, thereby decreasing the temperature and pressure of the He working gas in hermetic MCEU tubes as the HTF is heated; iii) a polytropic expansion of the working gas in the MECUs by moving the piston to the left with no HTF flow; and iv) an isochoric step with hot-to-cold flow of HTF that causes the temperature and pressure of the He working gas in the MCEU tubes to increase as the HTF is cooled. It is important to note that the working gas in the other end section of the MCEU tube simultaneously executes exactly the opposite cycle.
The performance of the thermodynamic cycle executed by the working gas at each end of the MCEU tube is calculated for an ideal gas at constant temperature near room temperature, and then with real gas properties in a MCEU with realistic design specifications for an AGRR operating from near room temperature to cryogenic temperatures applicable for numerous applications.
For the thermodynamic analysis the variables are defined as follows:
Consider a control volume around one thermally active end section of the MCEU including the working gas hermetically contained inside a thin-walled tubular shell. Apply energy conservation to the ideal working gas during the cycle and the shell and assume adiabatic processes, i.e., dQ=0 for control volume which can be expressed as:
mwcwdTw=−dUg−pdV
Assume instantaneous heat transfer from the working gas to the shell wall associated with a very small Biot number which means:
dTw=dTg=dT
The derivation of relationships between p, T and V are:
Given the ideal gas equation of state is:
pV=nRT
−pdV=−nRdT+Vdp
After substituting for dT into the first-law equation we have:
This equation defines k as the polytropic compression or expansion exponent. In the limit of massless tube walls, it reduces to cp/cv for the working gas as expected.
The polytropic exponent, k and the compression ratios of working gas in the MCEU show the importance of the ratio of thermal mass of the He working gas and the walls of the tube (the drive piston can be selected to minimize its thermal mass), the mean pressure of the He gas in the MCEU, and the geometry of the MCEU design. This derivation also shows that an adiabatic process for the entire control volume at either end of the MCEU means a polytropic process for the working gas during the compression or expansion caused by the moveable piston.
The specific work per mole for the working gas in a non-flow, hermetic MCEU is:
The work of compression for a polytropic process is then:
Define
so the work of compression done on the working gas becomes:
If no HTF flows in the regenerator of the AGRR, the temperature T2 of the helium working gas in the MCEUs does not change after polytropic compression so the working gas upon polytropic expansion returns exactly to T1. This is exactly what is expected in an ideal working gas with instantaneous heat transfer, no friction or leakage in the drive piston, no thermal conduction along shell walls, and perfect insulation between the working gas and the drive piston.
Now consider what happens when HTF flows over/around the MCEUs in the respective regenerator arrays to change T2 to T3 before the polytropic expansion step occurs.
Choose
because the temperature approach between the HTF and the MCEU shell at that position in the regenerator of the AGRR decreases from a maximum of T2−T1 to ˜0 during the optimum flow period of the HTF (this average value of T3 assumes linear temperature change which is a reasonable choice).
From isochoric cooling/heating:
Two MCEU cycles, as illustrated in
Calculating the temperature after polytropic expansion as a check:
The resultant work input needed for a complete cycle of the working gas (ideal gas) in a thermally active end section of the MCEU is given by the difference between work of compression from T1 and the work from expansion from T3, a slightly lower temperature:
Similarly, the heat and entropy flows for the working gas in the thermally active end sections of the MCEU can be calculated.
In
For an ideal gas, the change in entropy is:
Let's define
For the isochoric processes in the working gas (dV=0):
Q23=ncV(T3−T2)<0, Q41=ncV(T1−T4)>0
These equations show that heat (thermal energy) flows out of the selected control volume of the working gas in one end section of a MCEU in the hot-to-cold flow (2 to 3) of heat transfer fluid through an AGRR comprised of an array of MCEUs and heat flows into the control volume of the working gas in the cold-to-hot flow (4 to 1) of the HTF in the same AGRR.
For the polytropic processes in the working gas:
All the ncV terms cancel each other and:
This result shows that Q12341=−ΔWpolytropic, as it should be.
The inventors have prepared detailed design calculations, according to an embodiment, for a new MCEU with He working gas at up to 5.0 MPa mean pressure at 290 K using ⅛″ diameter Al alloy seamless tubing of type 2024-T6 with 0.003″ wall thickness with pistons ranging in diameter from ⅞ to ⅜ of the i.d. of the MCEU tube. With typical MCEU dimensions listed above, using real gas properties for helium working gas at starting pressure of 5.0 MPa at 290 K, and the temperature-dependent heat capacity of 2024-T6 Al alloy tube material, the calculated P-T cycle for an achievable MCEU piston design with He working gas at about 100 K is shown in
In
The drive pistons 806 can be driven by any appropriate mechanism, such as, for example, either of the mechanisms described above with reference to
First ends 808 of each of the MCEUs 804 are positioned within a first heat transfer chamber 810, while second ends 812 of each of the MCEUs are positioned within a second heat transfer chamber 814. The first heat transfer chamber 810 includes first and second fluid ports 816, 818 and the second heat transfer chamber 814 includes third and fourth fluid ports 820, 822. A thermal load 824 is in fluid communication with the first and third fluid ports 816, 820, while a heat sink 826 is in fluid communication with the second and fourth fluid ports 818, 822. A reversible fluid pump 828 is configured to drive a heat transfer fluid (HTF) through a heat transfer circuit formed by the first and second heat transfer chambers 812, 814, the thermal load 824, and the heat sink 826.
In operation, during a first operating step, the drive pistons 806 are driven to a first position, defined by an extreme of travel in a first direction, as shown in
During a second step, the pump 828 operates to drive the HTF in a first direction D1 through the fluid circuit, as shown in
During a third operational step, the flow of fluid is shut down, and the drive pistons 806 are driven to a second position defined by an extreme of travel in a second direction, opposite the first direction, as shown in
Finally, during a fourth step, the pump 828 operates to drive the HTF in a second direction D2 through the fluid circuit, as shown in
The four-step process outlined above is repeated continuously during operation of the device.
The term thermally active section is used here to refer to the outer surface of the portion of a cylinder that is in direct contact, on its inner surface, with a working fluid. Because the MCEUs 804 are configured to form the first and second annular gaps 830, 832, the working fluid remains in contact with the inner surfaces of the first and second ends 808, 812 along a length of the respective cylinders 805 that remains constant throughout the operational cycle. Accordingly, the surface area of the active sections of each of the first and second ends 808, 812 of the MCEUs 804 also remains unchanged throughout the cycle, even as the respective drive pistons 806 move reciprocally within the cylinders 805. This means that the ability of the heat transfer fluid outside the MCEUs 804 to exchange heat with the working fluid inside the MCEUs is not affected by the position of the pistons 806.
This is in contrast to devices in which a piston seal sweeps an inner face of a cylinder as the piston moves, compressing a working fluid into an end of the cylinder. In such a device, the active section is defined by the distance between the piston seal and the end of the cylinder, such that as the piston moves back and forth within the cylinder, the surface area of the active section continually changes, reaching a minimum when the working fluid is at maximum compression. Thus, the heat exchange capacity of the cylinder is at a minimum when the temperature difference across the cylinder wall is at a maximum, which can significantly reduce the heat transfer efficiency of the associated system.
In the embodiment of
The array 802 of MCEUs 804 is represented in
In the embodiment illustrated in
Although in most embodiments, a gaseous HTF is maintained at an elevated pressure of several hundred psia, in some embodiments in which the HTF is not pressurized, ambient air may be used as the HTF, in which case the heat sink can be omitted, so that the air is drawn directly into one or the other heat transfer chamber, then vented back to the atmosphere after exiting the other chamber, or even after passing through the thermal load.
The abstract of the present disclosure is provided as a brief outline of some of the principles of the invention according to one embodiment, and is not intended as a complete or definitive description of any embodiment thereof, nor should it be relied upon to define terms used in the specification or claims. The abstract does not limit the scope of the claims. Elements of the various embodiments described above can be combined, and further modifications can be made, to provide further embodiments without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. All of the patents and non-patent publications referred to in this specification and/or listed in the Application Data Sheet are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety. Aspects of the embodiments can be modified, if necessary to employ concepts of the various patents and publications to provide yet further embodiments.
While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other aspects and embodiments are contemplated. The various aspects and embodiments disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.
The present application claims priority benefit from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/210,367, entitled “WORK MECHANISMS FOR DIRECTLY-COUPLED MICRO COMPRESSOR-EXPANDER THERMAL UNITS,” filed Aug. 26, 2015; which, to the extent not inconsistent with the disclosure herein, is incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4488477 | Miyamoto | Dec 1984 | A |
5152147 | Saho et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5309716 | Kolbinger | May 1994 | A |
5737924 | Taguchi et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
6138459 | Yatsuzuka | Oct 2000 | A |
6233947 | Madni | May 2001 | B1 |
6272866 | Tsai et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6326706 | Zhang | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332323 | Reid et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6462439 | Denne | Oct 2002 | B1 |
8587163 | Camacho | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20080016907 | Barclay | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080115664 | Minowa | May 2008 | A1 |
20150004028 | Kang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
R. F. Barron, “Cryogenic Systems”; 2nd Edition (Oxford University Press, 1985). |
J. A. Barclay, M. A. Barclay, W. Jakobsen, and M. P. Skrzypkowski, Nasa SBIR Phase I Final Report, 2004; “Active Gas Regenerative Liquefier”; Contract No. NNJ04.1C25C. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170059213 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62210367 | Aug 2015 | US |