The present invention lies in the field of artificial bandwidth extension (ABE) of narrow band telephone speech, where the objective is to regenerate wideband speech from narrowband speech in order to improve speech naturalness.
In many current speech transmission systems (phone networks for example) the audio bandwidth is limited, at the moment to 0.3-3.4 kHz. Speech signals typically cover a wider band of frequencies, between 50 Hz and 8 kHz being normal. For transmission, a speech signal is encoded and sampled, and a sequence of samples is transmitted which defines speech but in the narrowband permitted by the available bandwidth. At the receiver, it is desired to regenerate the wideband speech, using an ABE method.
ABE algorithms are commonly based on a source-filter model of speech production, where the estimation of the wideband spectral envelope and the wideband excitation regeneration are treated as two independent sub-problems. Moreover, ABE algorithms typically aim at doubling the sampling frequency, for example from 7 to 14 kHz or from 8 to 16 kHz. Due to the lack of shared information between the narrowband and the missing wideband representations, ABE algorithms are prone to yield artefacts in the reconstructed speech signal. A pragmatic approach to alleviate some of these artefacts is to reduce the extension frequency band, for example to only increase the sampling frequency from 8 kHz-12 kHz. While this is helpful, it does not resolve the artefacts completely.
Known spectral-based excitation regeneration techniques either translate or fold the frequency band 0-4 kHz into the 4-8 kHz frequency band. In fact, in speech signals transmitted through current audio channels, the audio bandwidth is 0.3-3.4 kHz (that is, not precisely 0-4 kHz). Translation of the lower frequency band (0-4 kHz) into the upper frequency band (4-8 kHz) results in the frequency sub-band 0-2 kHz being translated (possibly pitch dependent) into the 4-6 kHz sub-band. Due to the commonly much stronger harmonics in the 0-2 kHz region, this typically yields metallic artefacts in the upper band region. Spectral folding produces a mirrored copy of the 2-4 kHz band into the 4-6 kHz band but without preserving the harmonic structure during voice speech. Another possibility is folding and translation around 3.5 kHz for the 7 to 14 kHz case.
A paper entitled “High Frequency Regeneration In Speech Coding Systems”, authored by Makhoul, et al, IEEE International Conference Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, April 1979, pages 428-431, discusses these techniques.
In a spectral translation approach discussed in the paper, the high band excitation is constructed by adding up-sampled low pass filtered narrowband excitation to a mirrored up-sampled and high pass filtered narrowband excitation.
The mirrored up-sampled narrowband excitation is obtained by first multiplying each sample with (−1)n, where n denotes the sample index, and then inserting a zero between every sample. Finally, the signal is high pass filtered. As for the spectral folding, the location of the spectral peaks in the high band are most likely not located at a multiple of the pitch frequency. Thus, the harmonic structure is not necessarily preserved in this approach.
It is an aim of the present invention to generate more natural speech from a narrowband speech signal.
According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of regenerating wideband speech from narrowband speech, the method comprising: receiving samples of a narrowband speech signal in a first range of frequencies; modulating received samples of the narrowband speech signal with a modulation signal having a modulating frequency adapted to upshift each frequency in the first range of frequencies by an amount determined by the modulating frequency wherein the modulating frequency is selected to translate into a target band a selected frequency band within the first range of signals; filtering the modulated samples using a target band filter to form a regenerated speech signal in the target band; and combining the narrow band speech signal with the regenerated speech signal in the target band to regenerate a wideband speech signal, the method comprising the step of controlling the modulated samples to lie in a second range of frequencies identified by determining a signal characteristic of frequencies in the first range of frequencies.
The second range of frequencies can be selected by controlling the first range of frequencies and/or the modulating frequency. In that case, the target band filter is a high pass filter wherein the lower limit of the high pass filter defines the lowermost frequency in the target band. Alternatively, the second range of frequencies can be selected by controlling one or more such target band filter to cut as a band pass filter to filter bands determined by analysing the input samples.
It is advantageous to select the modulating frequency so as to upshift a frequency band in the narrowband that is more likely to have a harmonic structure closer to that of the missing (high) frequency band to which it is translated.
Another aspect of the invention provides a system for generating wideband speech from narrowband speech, the system comprising: means for receiving samples of a narrowband speech signal in a first range of frequencies; means for modulating received samples of the narrowband speech signal with a modulation signal having a modulating frequency adapted to upshift each frequency in the first range of frequencies by an amount determined by the modulating frequency wherein the modulating frequency is selected to translate into a target band a selected frequency band within the first range of signals; a target band filter for filtering the modulated samples to form a regenerated speech signal in a target band; means for combining the narrowband speech signal with the regenerated speech signal in the target band to regenerate a wideband speech signal; and means for controlling the modulated samples to lie in a second range of frequencies identified by determining a signal characteristic of frequencies in the first range of frequencies.
The signal characteristic which is determined for selecting frequencies can be chosen from a number of possibilities including frequencies having a minimum echo, minimum pre-processor distortion, degree of voicing and particular temporal structures such as temporal localisation or concentration.
As a particular example, the signal characteristic can be a good signal to noise ratio. Improvements can be gained by selecting a frequency band in the narrowband speech signal that has a good signal-to-noise ratio, and modulating that frequency band for regenerating the missing target band.
The target band filter can be a high pass filter wherein the lower limit of the high pass filter is above the uppermost frequency of the narrowband speech.
It is also possible to average a set of translated signals from overlapping or non-overlapping frequency bands in the narrowband speech signal.
For a better understanding of the present invention and to show how the same may be carried into effect, reference will now be made by way of example to the accompanying drawings in which:
Reference will first be made to
Embodiments of the present invention relate to excitation regeneration in the scenario illustrated in the schematic of
A modulator 24 receives a modulation signal m which modulates a range of frequencies of the speech signal x to generate a modulated signal y. If the filter 22 is not present, this is all frequencies in the narrowband speech signal. In this embodiment, the modulation signal is at 2 kHz and so moves the frequencies 0-4 kHz into the 2-6 kHz range (that is, by an amount 2 kHz). The signal y is passed through a high pass filter 26 having a lower limit at 4 kHz, thereby discarding the 0-4 kHz translated signal. Thus a high band reconstructed speech signal z is generated, the high band being the target frequency band of 4-6 kHz. The regenerated high band signal is subject to a spectral envelope and the resulting signal is added back to the original speech signal x to generate a speech signal r as described with reference to
The modulation signal m is of the form2TTmodn+φ, where fmod denotes the modulating frequency, φ the phase and n a running index. The modulation signal is generated by block 28 which chooses the modulating frequency fmod and the phase φ. The modulation frequency fmod is determined such as to preserve the harmonic structure in the regenerated excitation high band. In the present implementation, the modulating frequency is normalised by the sampling frequency.
Taking the specific example, consider the pitch frequency to be 180 Hz, then the closest frequency to 2 kHz that is an integer multiple of the pitch frequency is floor(200/180)*180 (1980 Hz). Normalised by 1200 Hz it becomes 0.165. For a sampling frequency (after upsampling) of 12 kHz and a value of 2 kHz of the frequency shift, the frequency fmod can be expressed as fmod=floor(p/6)/p, where p represents the fractional pitch-lag.
The speech signal x is in the form [x(n), . . . ,x(n+T−1)] which denotes a speech block of length T of up-sampled decoded narrow band speech. To ensure signal continuity between adjacent speech blocks, the phase φ is updated every block as follows φ=mod (φ+πfmod T,2π), where mod(.,.)denotes the modulo operator (remainder after division). Each signal block of length T is multiplied by the T-dim vector [cos(2*π*fmod*1+φ), . . . cos(2*π*fmod*T+φ]. Thus, y=[y(n), . . . y(n+T−1)]=[2x(n)cos(2πfmod+φ), . . . 2x(n+T−1)cos(2πfmodT+φ)].
The frequency band of the narrow band speech x which is translated can be selected to alleviate metallic artefacts by selection of a frequency band that is more likely to have harmonic structure closer to that of the missing (high) frequency band by selection of a frequency band that includes frequencies showing an identified signal characteristic, e.g. a good signal-to-noise ratio. The method can include averaging a set of translated signals with overlapping bands.
Reference will now be made to
An alternative possibility is shown in
In
The control block 30 receives the speech signal x and has a process for evaluating a signal characteristic for the purpose of selecting the frequency band that is to be translated.
The signal characteristic can be chosen from a number of different possibilities. According to one example, the block 30 is a signal to noise ratio block which evaluates a signal to noise ratio in each frequency band in the narrow band speech signal, and selects the frequency band to be translated to include frequencies with the highest signal to noise ratio.
A further possibility is that the block 30 is an echo detection block, which evaluates the frequency bands with minimum echo.
A further possibility is that the block 30 determines the degree of voicing. According to one example, a measure of the degree of voicing can be the normalised correlation between the signal inside a frequency band and the same signal one pitch-cycle earlier. Smoothed versions of this measure can also be used to determine whether or not a frequency should be included in the first range of frequencies for translation.
As a further alternative, a measure of temporal structure can be provided, such as a measure of temporal localisation or temporal concentration. One measure of temporal localisation could be developed in accordance with the equation given below, although it will be appreciated that other measures of localisation could be utilised.
where
means the sum over a frame of samples, x denotes a sample index, t denotes a time index and tmean=Σx2t/Σx2
The low pass filtered signal from each filter is supplied to respective modulator 24a, 24b, 24c, each modulator being controlled by a modulation signal ma, mb, me at different frequencies. The resulting modulated signal is supplied to a high pass filter 26a, 26b, 26c in each path to produce a plurality of high band regenerated excitation signals. The high pass filters have their lower limits set appropriately, e.g. to 4 kHz lower limit of the missing (or desired target) high band, if different. The signals are weighted using weighting functions 34a, 34b, 34c by respective weights w1, w2, w3, and the weighted values are supplied to a summer 36. The output of the summer 36 is the desired regenerated excitation high band signal. This is subject to a spectral envelope 20 and added to the original narrow band speech signal x as in
The described embodiments of the present invention have significant advantages when compared with the prior art approaches. The approach described herein combines the preservation of harmonic structure and allows for the selection of a frequency band that is more likely to have a harmonic structure closer to that of the missing (high) frequency band, thus alleviating some of the metallic artefacts. Furthermore, if the original narrow band speech signal contains noise (due to acoustic noise and/or coding) it is beneficial to spectrally translate a region of the narrow band speech signal that shows the highest signal-to-noise ratio or perform several different spectral translations and linearly combine these to achieve simultaneous excitation regeneration and noise reduction (as shown in
By using a set of overlap/non-overlap sub-bands, it is possible to regenerate a given frequency band with less artefacts than would otherwise be experienced.
Reference will now be made to
In some embodiments, the target band filter 26′ will be a high pass filter such as that denoted by 26 in
The control unit 62 can control one or more of the above parameters depending on the implementation possibilities and the desired output. It will be appreciated that, for example, where the first range of frequencies is controlled using the low pass filter 22 so that the first range of frequencies satisfy certain identified signal characteristics, it may not be necessary to additionally alter or control the modulating frequency fm.
Moreover, the target band filter 26′ could then be a high pass filter with its lower limits set at the lower most frequency in the target band.
In an alternative scenario, the modulating frequency fm can be controlled as described above with reference to
A still further possibility is to control the output band using the target band filter 26′ such that only selected frequencies are combined to form a regenerated feature signal in the target band, these frequencies being based on frequencies analysed on the input side as having certain identified signal characteristics of the type mentioned above.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0822537.7 | Dec 2008 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/635,235, filed Dec. 10, 2009, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/456,033, filed on Jun. 10, 2009, and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 or 365 to Great Britain Application No. 0822537.7, filed Dec. 10, 2008. The entire teachings of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4734795 | Fukami et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
5012517 | Wilson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5060269 | Zinser | Oct 1991 | A |
5214708 | McEachern | May 1993 | A |
5305420 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5621856 | Akagiri | Apr 1997 | A |
5687191 | Lee et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5715365 | Griffin et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5956674 | Smyth et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6055501 | MacCaughelty | Apr 2000 | A |
6058360 | Bergstrom | May 2000 | A |
6188981 | Benyassine et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6226606 | Acero et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6424939 | Herre et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6453283 | Gigi | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456963 | Araki | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6507820 | Deutgen | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6526384 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6680972 | Liljeryd et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687667 | Gournay et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6917911 | Schultz | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7003451 | Kjorling et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7171357 | Boland | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7177803 | Boillot et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7254534 | Ansorge et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7337118 | Davidson et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346499 | Chennoukh et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7359854 | Nilsson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7398204 | Najaf-Zadeh et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7433817 | Kjorling et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7461003 | Tanrikulu | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7478045 | Allamanche et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7792679 | Virette et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801733 | Lee et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7848921 | Ehara | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8041577 | Smaragdis et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8078474 | Vos et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8160889 | Iser et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8265940 | Geiser et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8332210 | Nilsson et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8386243 | Nilsson et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8463599 | Ramabadran et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8856011 | Sverrisson et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9947340 | Nilsson et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
20010029445 | Charkani | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020165711 | Boland | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030009327 | Nilsson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012221 | El-maleh et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028386 | Zinser et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050786 | Jax et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030158726 | Philippe et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040153313 | Aubauer | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20060149532 | Boillot et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149538 | Lee | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060200344 | Kosek et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060277039 | Vos et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005351 | Sathyendra | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070067163 | Kabal | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070150269 | Nongpiur | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080059166 | Ehara | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077399 | Yoshida | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080120117 | Choo et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080177532 | Greiss et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195392 | Iser et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080270125 | Choo et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300866 | Mukhtar | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090198500 | Garudadri et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100145684 | Nilsson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145685 | Nilsson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100223052 | Nilsson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110270616 | Garudadri et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2618316 | Jul 2008 | CA |
1300833 | Apr 2003 | EP |
9857436 | Dec 1998 | WO |
0135395 | May 2001 | WO |
02056301 | Jul 2002 | WO |
03003600 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03044777 | May 2003 | WO |
2004072958 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2006116025 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
T. Unno and A. McCree, “A robust narrowband to wideband extension system featuring enhanced codebook mapping,” Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005., Philadelphia, PA, 2005, pp. I/805-I/808 vol. 1.doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2005.1415236 (Year: 2005). |
“Search Report Issued in Great Britain Patent Application No. 0822536.9”, dated Mar. 27, 2009, 1 Page. |
“Search Report Issued in United Kingdom Patent Application No. 0822537.7”, dated Apr. 6, 2009, 4 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in European Patent Application No. 09799076.6”, dated Oct. 15, 2012, 6 Pages. |
“Decision to Grant Issued in European Patent Application No. 09799590.6”, dated Feb. 28, 2013, 2 Pages. |
“Intent to Grant Issue in European Patent Application No. 09799590.6”, dated Nov. 6, 2012, 7 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/456,012”, dated Jun. 13, 2012, 14 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 12/456,012”, dated Sep. 7, 2012, 4 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/456,033”, dated Jul. 23, 2012, 23 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/456,033”, dated Jan. 24, 2013, 2 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/456,033”, dated Jan. 9, 2013, 2 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/456,033”, dated Nov. 20, 2012, 5 Pages. |
“Appeal Brief filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,235”, Filed Date: Mar. 18, 2016, 28 Pages. |
“Applicant Initiated Interview Summary Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,235”, dated Nov. 16, 2012, 3 Pages. |
“Applicant Initiated Interview Summary Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,235”, dated Dec. 26, 2012, 1 Page. |
“Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,235”, dated Feb. 10, 2016, 2 Pages. |
“Examiner's Answer Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,235”, dated Sep. 29, 2016, 23 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,235”, dated May 1, 2013, 19 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,235”, dated Oct. 21, 2014, 17 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,235”, dated Oct. 19, 2015, 22 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,235”, dated Mar. 14, 2014, 17 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,235”, dated Aug. 24, 2012, 16 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,235”, dated Apr. 7, 2015, 19 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in European Patent Application No. 12/635,235”, dated Dec. 6, 2017, 13 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,235”, dated Dec. 18, 2017, 9 Pages. |
“Pre-Brief Conference request filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,235”, dated Jan. 19, 2016, 7 Pages. |
“Appeal Decision Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,235”, dated Sep. 5, 2017, 14 Pages. |
Makhoul, et al., “High-Frequency Regeneration in Speech Coding Systems”, In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 4, Apr. 1979, pp. 428-431. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Patent Application No. PCT/EP09/66876”, dated Jun. 11, 2010, 10 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/EP2009/066847”, dated May 31, 2010, 7 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180204586 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12635235 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 15918984 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12456033 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 12635235 | US |