This invention relates to shock absorbers and more particularly to shock absorbers that capture energy resulting from the relative motion of a vehicle's suspension system.
It is known that automobiles are inefficient, wasting over 80% of the energy stored in the fuel as heat. Thus eight of every ten gallons in the vehicle's tank don't help propel the vehicle.
Automobile manufacturers have made costly strides to improve fuel economy. For example, regenerative braking is standard on many hybrid automobiles. Car makers also spend a great deal of effort to reduce wind drag so as to improve fuel economy through streamlined, low drag automobile body designs. Manufacturers also use lighter, yet more expensive, materials to reduce vehicle weight to reduce fuel consumption.
Motor vehicles include a suspension system to control vertical motion of the wheel with respect to the vehicle. In addition to springs, shock absorbers are provided to provide damping. The energy removed from a conventional suspension system is lost as heat. There are known systems that attempt to recover suspension system energy. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,261,171 teaches a mechanical arrangement in which reciprocating movements of a wheel relative to a vehicle body are converted to rotations of an armature of a generator to produce electricity for recharging the battery of the vehicle. Another electromechanical regenerative system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,570,286 that utilizes a magnet moving in relation to conductive coils.
United States published pending Application No. U.S. 2007/0089924 A1 discloses an hydraulic system for recovering energy from the relative motion between a vehicle body and its wheels. This published application, however, requires a conventional shock absorber to provide the necessary damping function. Further, this application lacks a capacitive reservoir in the hydraulic circuit that is necessary for an operative system.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a regenerative shock absorber that not only recovers energy from the reciprocating motion of a vehicle's suspension system, but also provides the damping function so as to make unnecessary a separate shock absorber.
In one aspect, the regenerative shock absorber of the invention includes a piston disposed for reciprocating motion within a cylinder as a vehicle's suspension system deflects. Hydraulic fluid is contained within the cylinder. A first fluid circuit is in fluid communication with (1) a first chamber in the cylinder on a first side of the piston, (2) in fluid communication with an hydraulic motor and (3) in fluid communication with a capacitive reservoir. Upon compression of the piston, hydraulic fluid passes through the hydraulic motor thereby turning a shaft thereof. A second fluid circuit is in fluid communication with a second chamber in the cylinder on a second side of the piston and also in fluid communication with the first chamber. Upon extension of the piston, hydraulic fluid passes from the second chamber to the first chamber. An electric generator is connected to the hydraulic motor shaft for generating electricity upon rotation of the shaft.
In yet another aspect, the regenerative shock absorber of the invention includes an hydraulic circuit arrangement so that energy may be harvested during both compression or relaxation of the shock absorber. In this embodiment, upon compression or relaxation of the shock absorber, the resulting pressure differential across the hydraulic motor will induce rotational motion of its output shaft. This output shaft is directly connected to a permanent magnet generator/DC electric motor. The wattage rating of the motor is selected entirely based on the vehicle's mass and spring stiffness.
The electric energy generated by the generator may be used by the vehicle as it is generated or stored in, for example, the vehicle's battery. It is preferred that the harvested electricity be used to power components on a vehicle that would otherwise strain the internal combustion engine, thereby increasing fuel efficiency.
Beyond the basic fluid losses in the hydraulic circuits, damping is provided mostly by the electric generator as the back-emf resists rotational motion of the armature relative to the stator. This resistance is transferred directly to the shock fluid by the hydraulic motor. The damping force provided by the motor is selected to be directly proportional to the velocity of the hydraulic fluid so that increased fluid velocity results in an increased damping force.
The capacitive reservoir accommodates the piston shaft volume that is introduced upon the compression stroke of the shock absorber of the invention.
First of all, some of the theory on which the present invention is based will be discussed. It is important to note how much energy is typically lost in the vertical motion of a car or truck so as to be able to decide whether the energy is worth harvesting. The model the inventors chose to use is a simple spring-based model in which the energy that is present in the vertical motion of a car can be observed in the compression and extension of its springs. The energy in a compressed spring is given by the equation
Using an experimentally determined value for k of 1.2×105 N/m, we find that for a 3500 pound automobile, vertical displacements store the amounts of energy in a single spring as shown below. We note that heavy truck springs are much stiffer.
We have approximated city driving by assuming that the springs undergo vibrations of magnitude 2 cm at a frequency 3 Hz, keeping in mind that work is done both compressing and extending the spring so that energy can be harvested from both of these motions. Based on these assumptions, a one hour drive generates 1.34 kilowatt-hours of energy available to harvest.
With reference now to the drawing,
Flow of hydraulic fluid upon compression of the piston 12 will now be described in conjunction with
With reference now to
Flow characteristics of at least one of the fluid flow circuits may be selected to provide an effective damping in addition to recovery of energy. In this way, the system of the invention not only provides for energy recovery, but also effective damping for wheel control, thereby eliminating the need for a conventional shock absorber.
Yet another embodiment of the invention is shown in
Upon extension of the piston 12, hydraulic fluid passes through a check valve 52 and into the capacitive reservoir 22 and on through the hydraulic motor 20. As before, hydraulic fluid returns to the shock body 10 through check valves 46 and 48. Note that upon compression and extension of the piston 12, hydraulic fluid flows in the same direction through the motor 20 thereby turning its shaft 70 in the same direction for actuating the electric generator 50.
The power electronics to implement the regenerative shock absorber of the invention will now be discussed in conjunction with
The controller 60 modifies the resistance across the generator 50 winding, thus affecting the damping characteristics of the shock absorber and adjusting the output voltage enabling the system to be safely connected to several types of loads. As mentioned above, resistance across the generator winding is achieved by switching the output leads of the generator 50 between the three sources: the low resistance element 62, the converter 64, and the open circuit 66. The low resistance element 62 (such as a closed-circuit connection (a wire)) creates high damping force. The open circuit connection 66 provides very low damping. Depending on the load connected to the output of the converter 64, the converter provides differing damping force. The controller 60 preferably uses feedback to achieve a given time averaged effective resistance across the generator 50. This feedback may come from sensors such as a voltage and current sensor placed across the generator terminals. This resistance can be set by the manufacturer, the driver (to dynamically adjust the suspension dynamics based on road conditions, driving, or cargo), or even by sensors such as strain gauges that adjust damping based on cargo weight. Adjustment of output voltage is achieved solely by the converter 64. The converter 64 has its own feedback loop that maintains a constant voltage output, when powered. Since input power from the suspension is varying, the converter 64 holds the voltage steady while allowing current flow to fluctuate. The converter 64 circuitry is similar to a standard buck/boost converter with negative feedback based on output voltage. This arrangement insures power only flows out (the load is unable to drive the input, in this case, the generator). Capacitors (not shown) smooth the output voltage. It is noted that any type of efficient converter that is able to maintain a given voltage, ensure one-way current flow, and have sufficient input filtering to accommodate a PWM input, can be used. The buck/boost converter 64 is merely one such example.
Depending on switching duty cycle, this circuitry has the effect of either reducing the output voltage or increasing output voltage. Duty cycle is controlled via a feedback loop that maintains a given output voltage. Neglecting parasitics, the buck/boost converter 64 operation is perfectly efficient. Thus for the regenerative shock absorber disclosed herein connected to a conventional 12v car battery, the converter 64 will convert 6v at 1 A from the generator into 12v at 0.5 A. Likewise it will convert 48v at 1 A into 12v at 4 A. Note that the voltage stays constant regardless of the input, but the current changes. Power is conserved and all the energy from the generator is harvested for use.
The arrangement in
The power electronics discussed above in conjunction with
The regenerative shock absorber of the present invention is applicable to any wheeled vehicle; heavy trucks remain a compelling target because of their substantial weight and high suspension spring stiffness. This technology is also suitable for military vehicles.
It is recognized that modifications and variations of the invention disclosed herein will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. All such modifications and variations are included within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
998128 | Smith | Jul 1911 | A |
1116293 | Kane | Nov 1914 | A |
1290293 | Morski | Jan 1919 | A |
2194530 | Torstensson | Mar 1940 | A |
2885202 | Trumper et al. | May 1959 | A |
2958292 | Lipe et al. | Nov 1960 | A |
3507580 | Howard | Apr 1970 | A |
3515889 | Kammerer | Jun 1970 | A |
3559027 | Arsem | Jan 1971 | A |
368859 | Hudspeth et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3688859 | Hudspeth et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3800202 | Oswald | Mar 1974 | A |
3803906 | Ross | Apr 1974 | A |
3921746 | Lewus | Nov 1975 | A |
4032829 | Schenavar | Jun 1977 | A |
4033580 | Paris | Jul 1977 | A |
4216420 | Jinbo et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4295538 | Lewus | Oct 1981 | A |
4401926 | Morton et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4480709 | Commanda | Nov 1984 | A |
4500827 | Merritt et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4606551 | Toti et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4625993 | Williams et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4673194 | Sugasawa | Jun 1987 | A |
4729459 | Inagaki et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4740711 | Sato et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4815575 | Murty | Mar 1989 | A |
4872701 | Akatsu et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4887699 | Ivers et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4908553 | Hoppie et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4921080 | Lin | May 1990 | A |
4936423 | Karnopp | Jun 1990 | A |
4981309 | Froeschle et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5034890 | Sugasawa et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5046309 | Yoshino et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5060959 | Davis et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5091679 | Murty et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5098119 | Williams et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5215327 | Gatter et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5243525 | Tsutsumi et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5276622 | Miller et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5291960 | Brandenburg et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5295705 | Butsuen et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5337560 | Abdelmalek et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5377791 | Kawashima et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5391953 | Van de Veen | Feb 1995 | A |
5570286 | Margolis et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5590734 | Caires | Jan 1997 | A |
5608308 | Kiuchi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5659205 | Weisser et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5684383 | Tsuji et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5717303 | Engel | Feb 1998 | A |
5764009 | Fukaya et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5794439 | Lisniansky | Aug 1998 | A |
5839800 | Koga et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5941328 | Lyons et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6049746 | Southward et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6111375 | Zenobi | Aug 2000 | A |
6349543 | Lisniansky | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6394238 | Rogala | May 2002 | B1 |
6441508 | Hylton | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6559553 | Yumita | May 2003 | B2 |
6575484 | Rogala et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592060 | Vomhof et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6631960 | Grand et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6765389 | Moore | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6876100 | Yumita | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908162 | Obayashi et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920951 | Song et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6952060 | Goldner et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6964325 | Maes | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973880 | Kumar | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7015594 | Asada | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023107 | Okuda et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034482 | Komiyama et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7087342 | Song | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7335999 | Potter | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336002 | Kato et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7392998 | Runkel | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7854203 | Kumar | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20020060551 | Ikeda | May 2002 | A1 |
20020070510 | Rogala | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020145404 | Dasgupta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030034697 | Goldner et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030150352 | Kumar | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169048 | Kim et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040119289 | Zabramny | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040207350 | Wilton et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212273 | Gould | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20070018626 | Chi | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070089919 | de la Torre et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070089924 | de la Torre et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080012262 | Carabelli | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080238396 | Ng et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080257626 | Carabelli et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100072760 | Bavetta et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100262308 | Bacerra et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3937987 | May 1991 | DE |
195 35 752 | Mar 1997 | DE |
1878598 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2152111 | Apr 1973 | FR |
2346176 | Oct 1977 | FR |
2661643 | Nov 1991 | FR |
652732 | May 1951 | GB |
1070783 | Jun 1967 | GB |
2003-035254 | Feb 2003 | JP |
WO 9726145 | Jul 1997 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application PCT/US2009/040749 dated Jul. 15, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application PCT/US2010/002116 dated Oct. 28, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application PCT/US2010/002116 dated Jul. 29, 2010. |
Shen et al., Automative electric power and energy mangement—a system approach. Business Briefing: Global Automotive Manufacturing and Technology. 2003:1-5. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090260935 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |