The present invention relates to systems and methods for preventing processing errors in processors and, more particularly, to systems and methods for providing register pointer traps to identify registers having invalid data to prevent propagating processing errors due to these registers being used as pointers.
After power is applied to a chip, registers and memory elements in general on the chip will assume values that are unpredictable and will contain data that is invalid. When the chip is a processor, this is not problematic unless a program resident on the processor tries to read memory elements prior to known values having been written into the memory elements. This may be particularly problematic when programs use a memory element, such as a register, as a pointer to a memory. In the latter scenario, the pointer is invalid, and its use will lead to processing errors.
To prevent processing errors, there is a need for a mechanism to identify when a memory element, such as a register, has invalid data in it. There is a further need to flag registers that have invalid data in them to prevent these registers from being used as pointers to memory.
According to embodiments of the present invention, trap flags and a pointer trap are associated with registers in a processor. Each trap flag indicates whether a corresponding register has been written with valid data. If not, the trap flag is set to indicate that the register corresponding to the trap flag contains invalid data. During instruction processing, the pointer trap receives control signals from instruction fetch/decode logic on the processor indicating an instruction being processed calls for a register to be used as a pointer. If the specified pointer register has its corresponding trap flag set, the then the pointer trap indicates that a processing exception has occurred. The interrupt logic/exception processing logic then causes a trap interrupt service routine (ISR) to be executed in response to the exception. The ISR prevents errors from being propagated during the ensuing instruction processing due to invalid pointer values.
According to one embodiment of the invention, a method of preventing processing errors due to invalid pointers includes fetching an instruction having a pointer operand for execution. The method further includes determining whether a trap flag corresponding to the pointer is in a set or reset condition and generating a trap control signal when the trap flag is in a reset condition. The method may further include executing the instruction and triggering a trap interrupt based on the trap control signal.
The trap flag corresponding to the pointer may be changed from the reset condition to the set condition based upon a write to the pointer. In addition, the trap flag may be changed to the reset condition after a power up or a reset of the processor.
According to another embodiment of the invention, a method of preventing processing errors due to invalid pointers includes providing trap flags, each corresponding to a pointer register. The trap flags are reset upon a power up or reset. Conversely, the trap flag corresponding to each pointer register are set based on the pointer register being written. A trap control signal may be generated when an instruction reads a pointer register with a trap flag set to reset. The trap control signal may trigger a trap interrupt.
According to still another embodiment of the invention, a processor prevents processing errors due to invalid pointers. The processor includes instruction fetch and decode logic, registers, trap flags and pointer trap logic. The instruction fetch and decode logic fetches and decodes instructions. The trap flags each correspond to a register and each indicate a set or reset condition. The pointer trap is coupled to the trap flags and generates a trap control signal based on decoding an instruction that reads a register that has a corresponding trap flag in a reset condition. The trap control signal may only be generated when the register being read from is acting as a pointer register.
The above described features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully appreciated with reference to the detailed description and appended figures in which:
According to embodiments of the present invention, trap flags and a pointer trap are associated with registers in a processor. Each trap flag indicates whether a corresponding register has been written with valid data. If not, the trap flag is set to indicate that the register corresponding to the trap flag contains invalid data. During instruction processing, the pointer trap receives control signals from instruction fetch/decode logic on the processor indicating an instruction being processed calls for a register to be used as a pointer. If the specified pointer register has its corresponding trap flag set, then the pointer trap indicates that a processing exception has occurred. The interrupt logic/exception processing logic then causes a trap interrupt service routine (ISR) to be executed in response to the exception. The ISR prevents errors from being propagated during the ensuing instruction processing due to invalid pointer values.
In order to describe embodiments of the invention, an overview of pertinent processor elements is first presented with reference to
Overview of Processor Elements
The processor 100 includes a program memory 105, an instruction fetch/decode unit 110, instruction execution units 115, data memory and registers 120, peripherals 125, data I/O 130, and a program counter and loop control unit 135. The bus 150, which may include one or more common buses, communicates data between the units as shown.
The program memory 105 stores software embodied in program instructions for execution by the processor 100. The program memory 105 may comprise any type of nonvolatile memory such as a read only memory (ROM), a programmable read only memory (PROM), an electrically programmable or an electrically programmable and erasable read only memory (EPROM or EEPROM) or flash memory. In addition, the program memory 105 may be supplemented with external nonvolatile memory 145 as shown to increase the complexity of software available to the processor 100. Alternatively, the program memory may be volatile memory which receives program instructions from, for example, an external non-volatile memory 145. When the program memory 105 is nonvolatile memory, the program memory may be programmed at the time of manufacturing the processor 100 or prior to or during implementation of the processor 100 within a system. In the latter scenario, the processor 100 may be programmed through a process called in-line serial programming.
The instruction fetch/decode unit 110 is coupled to the program memory 105, the instruction execution units 115 and the data memory 120. Coupled to the program memory 105 and the bus 150 is the program counter and loop control unit 135. The instruction fetch/decode unit 110 fetches the instructions from the program memory 105 specified by the address value contained in the program counter 135. The instruction fetch/decode unit 110 then decodes the fetched instructions and sends the decoded instructions to the appropriate execution unit 115. The instruction fetch/decode unit 110 may also send operand information including addresses of data to the data memory 120 and to functional elements that access the registers.
The program counter and loop control unit 135 includes a program counter register (not shown) which stores an address of the next instruction to be fetched. During normal instruction processing, the program counter register may be incremented to cause sequential instructions to be fetched. Alternatively, the program counter value may be altered by loading a new value into it via the bus 150. The new value may be derived based on decoding and executing a flow control instruction such as, for example, a branch instruction. In addition, the loop control portion of the program counter and loop control unit 135 may be used to provide repeat instruction processing and repeat loop control as further described below.
The instruction execution units 115 receive the decoded instructions from the instruction fetch/decode unit 110 and thereafter execute the decoded instructions. As part of this process, the execution units may retrieve one or two operands via the bus 150 and store the result into a register or memory location within the data memory 120. The execution units may include an arithmetic logic unit (ALU) such as those typically found in a microcontroller. The execution units may also include a digital signal processing engine, a floating point processor, an integer processor or any other convenient execution unit. A preferred embodiment of the execution units and their interaction with the bus 150, which may include one or more buses, is presented in more detail below with reference to
The data memory and registers 120 are volatile memory and are used to store data used and generated by the execution units. The data memory 120 and program memory 105 are preferably separate memories for storing data and program instructions respectively. This format is a known generally as a Harvard architecture. It is noted, however, that according to the present invention, the architecture may be a von Neumann architecture or a modified Harvard architecture which permits the use of some program space for data space. A dotted line is shown, for example, connecting the program memory 105 to the bus 150. This path may include logic for aligning data reads from program space such as, for example, during table reads from program space to data memory 120.
Referring again to
The data I/O unit 130 may include transceivers and other logic for interfacing with the external devices/systems 140. The data I/O unit 130 may further include functionality to permit in circuit serial programming of the Program memory through the data I/O unit 130.
The W registers 240 are general purpose address and/or data registers. The DSP engine 230 is coupled to both the X and Y memory buses and to the W registers 240. The DSP engine 230 may simultaneously fetch data from each of the X and Y memory, execute instructions which operate on the simultaneously fetched data and write the result to an accumulator (not shown) and write a prior result to X or Y memory or to the W registers 240 within a single processor cycle.
In one embodiment, the ALU 270 may be coupled only to the X memory bus and may only fetch data from the X bus. However, the X and Y memories 210 and 220 may be addressed as a single memory space by the X address generator in order to make the data memory segregation transparent to the ALU 270. The memory locations within the X and Y memories may be addressed by values stored in the W registers 240.
Any processor clocking scheme may be implemented for fetching and executing instructions. A specific example follows, however, to illustrate an embodiment of the present invention. Each instruction cycle is comprised of four Q clock cycles Q1-Q4. The four phase Q cycles provide timing signals to coordinate the decode, read, process data and write data portions of each instruction cycle.
According to one embodiment of the processor 100, the processor 100 concurrently performs two operations—it fetches the next instruction and executes the present instruction. Accordingly, the two processes occur simultaneously. The following sequence of events may comprise, for example, the fetch instruction cycle:
The following sequence of events may comprise, for example, the execute instruction cycle for a single operand instruction:
The following sequence of events may comprise, for example, the execute instruction cycle for a dual operand instruction using a data pre-fetch mechanism. These instructions pre-fetch the dual operands simultaneously from the X and Y data memories and store them into registers specified in the instruction. They simultaneously allow instruction execution on the operands fetched during the previous cycle.
Pointer Trap Embodiments
A reset/power up control unit 315 resides on the processor and is used to initialize the processor after a power up and after a processor reset. The unit 315 may be used to control when the processor begins to process instructions after a power on event. This may be performed by letting a predetermined number of clock cycles occur prior to releasing the processor to process instructions. During this start up period, the processor and oscillator clocking the processor are given time to stabilize. In the event of either a power on or a processor reset, and possibly other events, the reset/power up control unit 315 sends a reset control signal to the trap flag control unit 320 to reset the trap flags. This is done because the registers on the processor contain invalid data after a power on event or after a processor reset.
The trap flag control unit 320 is coupled to the reset/power up control unit 315 and the instruction fetch/decode unit 310. In response to receiving a reset control signal from the reset/power up control unit 315, the trap flag control unit 320 causes the trap flags to be reset to a predetermined value, which may be for example a zero or a one. The reset causes the trap flags 345 to indicate that their corresponding registers 340 include invalid data and hence should not be used to provide pointer values.
When an instruction that is being processed calls for writing to one of the registers, the instruction fetch/decode unit 310 generates a write control signal that identifies the particular registers that are being written into. The trap flag control unit 320 receives the write control signal and sets the trap flag 345 for the corresponding register that is being written into to a value that indicates that the register contains valid data. This value may be a zero or one and is the opposite value from the reset value stored after a processor power up or reset.
The trap flags 345 accordingly each relate to a corresponding register 340. In a reset state, a trap flag indicates that the corresponding register contains invalid data. In a set state, the trap flag indicates that the corresponding register contains valid data. The state of the trap flags 345 are reset upon a power on occurrence or a processor reset. The state of each trap flag 345 is thereafter changed to a set state after the corresponding register is written.
The pointer trap 325 is coupled to the instruction fetch/decode unit 310. When an instruction that is being processed calls for reading a pointer value (or other value) from one of the registers, the instruction fetch/decode unit 310 generates a read control signal that identifies the particular registers that are being written into. The pointer trap 325 receives the read control signal for the corresponding register that is being read from. The pointer trap 325 reads the trap flag of the register being read that is identified in the read control signal. When the trap flag corresponding to the register being read is in the reset condition, the pointer trap generates a trap control signal that is sent to the interrupt logic 330 to cause a trap interrupt. When the trap flag corresponding to the register being read is in the set condition, the pointer trap generates a trap control signal that is sent to the interrupt logic 330 that does not cause a trap interrupt. In this manner, the pointer trap 325 monitors instructions that are being processed and when the instructions will result in reading a pointer value that includes invalid data, a trap interrupt is triggered.
The interrupt logic 330 receives indications of exceptions from various units on the processor. The interrupt logic 330 thereafter arbitrates priority and determines which interrupt to service and when. Upon selection of the trap interrupt, the interrupt logic 330 identifies the trap interrupt to the ISR vector register 335.
The ISR vector register 335 is a look up table that includes the address of the first instruction of various interrupt service routines (ISRs). When the trap interrupt is being serviced, the address of the first instruction of the trap ISR is loaded into the program counter 305 which causes the trap ISR to be run. The trap ISR typically places the processor in a known condition to avoid processing errors.
In step 460, the processor sends a trap control signal to interrupt control logic on the processor. The trap control signal indicates that a pointer trap exception has occurred. Then in step 470, the processor loads and executes a trap ISR to prevent propagating processing errors and to return the processor to a known state.
While specific embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it will be understood by those having ordinary skill in the art that changes may be made to those embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example,
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/870,446 entitled “Register Pointer Trap” which was filed by Michael I. Catherwood on Jun. 1, 2001 now abandoned and is assigned to the same entity as the present application.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3771146 | Cotton et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3781810 | Downing | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3886524 | Appelt | May 1975 | A |
| 3930253 | Maida | Dec 1975 | A |
| 4025771 | Lynch et al. | May 1977 | A |
| 4074353 | Woods et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4090250 | Carlson et al. | May 1978 | A |
| 4323981 | Nakamura | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4379338 | Nishitani et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4398244 | Chu et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4408274 | Wheatley et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4451885 | Gerson et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4472788 | Yamazaki | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4481576 | Bicknell | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4488252 | Vassar | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4511990 | Hagiwara et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4556938 | Parker et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4615005 | Maejima et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4626988 | George | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4709324 | Kloker | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4727475 | Kiremidjian | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4730248 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4742479 | Kloker et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4768149 | Konopik et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4779191 | Greenblatt | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4782457 | Cline | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4800524 | Roesgen | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4807172 | Nukiyama | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4829420 | Stahle | May 1989 | A |
| 4829460 | Ito | May 1989 | A |
| 4839846 | Hirose et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4841468 | Miller et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4872128 | Shimizu | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4882701 | Ishii | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4926371 | Vassilliadis et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4941120 | Brown et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4942524 | Nunomura | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4943940 | New | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4945507 | Ishida et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4959776 | Deerfield et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4977533 | Miyabayashi et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4984213 | Abdoo et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5007020 | Inskeep | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5012441 | Retter | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5032986 | Pathak et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5034887 | Yasui et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5038310 | Akagiri et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5040178 | Lindsay et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5056004 | Ohde et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5099445 | Studor et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5101484 | Kohn | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5117498 | Miller et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5121431 | Wiener | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5122981 | Taniguchi | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5155823 | Tsue | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5177373 | Nakamura | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5197023 | Nakayama | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5197140 | Balmer | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5206940 | Murakami et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5212662 | Cocanougher et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5218239 | Boomer | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5239654 | Ing-Simmons et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5276634 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5282153 | Bartkowiak et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5327543 | Miura et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5327566 | Forsyth | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5375080 | Davies | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5379240 | Byrne | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5386563 | Thomas | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5392435 | Masui et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5418976 | Iida | May 1995 | A |
| 5422805 | McIntyre et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5432943 | Mitsuishi | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5448703 | Amini et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5448706 | Fleming et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5450027 | Gabara | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5463749 | Wertheizer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5469377 | Amano | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5471600 | Nakamoto | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5497340 | Uramoto et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5499380 | Iwata et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5504916 | Murakami et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5506484 | Munro et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5517436 | Andreas et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5525874 | Mallarapu et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5548544 | Matheny et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5561384 | Reents et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5561619 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5561774 | Aikawa et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5564028 | Swoboda et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5568380 | Broadnax et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5568412 | Han et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5596760 | Ueda | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5600813 | Nakagawa et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5604864 | Noda | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5611061 | Yasuda | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5619711 | Anderson | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623646 | Clarke | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5638524 | Kiuchi et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5642516 | Hedayat et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5649146 | Riou | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5651121 | Davies | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5657484 | Scarrá | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5659700 | Chen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5682339 | Tam | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5689693 | White | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5694350 | Wolrich et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5696711 | Makineni | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5701493 | Jaggar | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5706460 | Craig et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5706466 | Dockser | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5715470 | Asano et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5737570 | Koch | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5740095 | Parant | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5740419 | Potter | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5740451 | Muraki et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5748516 | Goddard et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5748970 | Miyaji et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5764555 | McPherson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5765216 | Weng et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5765218 | Ozawa et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774711 | Henry et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5778237 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5778416 | Harrison et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5790443 | Shen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5808926 | Gorshtein et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812439 | Hansen | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812868 | Moyer et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5815693 | McDermott et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5825730 | Nishida et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5826013 | Nachenberg | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5826072 | Knapp et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5826096 | Baxter | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828875 | Halvarsson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5862065 | Muthusamy | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5867726 | Ohsuga et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5875342 | Temple | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5880984 | Burchfiel et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5887146 | Baxter et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5892697 | Brakefield | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5892699 | Duncan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5894428 | Harada | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5900683 | Rinehart et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5909385 | Nishiyama et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917741 | Ng | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918252 | Chen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5930159 | Wong | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930503 | Drees | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5936870 | Im | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5937199 | Temple | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5938759 | Kamijo | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5941940 | Prasad et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5943249 | Handlogten | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5944816 | Dutton et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5951627 | Kiamilev et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5951679 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5973527 | Schweighofer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974549 | Golan | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978825 | Divine et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5983333 | Kolagotia et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991787 | Abel et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991868 | Kamiyama et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5996067 | White | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6002234 | Ohm et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009454 | Dummermuth | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6014723 | Tremblay et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6018757 | Wong | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6026489 | Wachi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6044392 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044434 | Oliver | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6049858 | Kolagotia et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055619 | North et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6058409 | Kozaki et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6058410 | Sharangpani | May 2000 | A |
| 6058464 | Taylor | May 2000 | A |
| 6061711 | Song et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6061780 | Shippy et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6061783 | Harriman | May 2000 | A |
| 6076154 | Van Eijndhoven et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6084880 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6101521 | Kosiec | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6101599 | Wright et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6115732 | Oberman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6128728 | Dowling | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6134574 | Oberman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6144980 | Oberman | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6145049 | Wong | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6181151 | Wasson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6192447 | Shand | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6202163 | Gabzdyl et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6205467 | Lambrecht et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6209086 | Chi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6243786 | Huang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6243804 | Cheng | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6260162 | Typaldos et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6282637 | Chan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6292866 | Zaiki et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6295574 | MacDonald | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6300800 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6315200 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6356970 | Killian et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363522 | Click et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6377619 | Denk et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6397318 | Peh | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6412081 | Koscal et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6434020 | Lambert et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6487654 | Dowling | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6523108 | James et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6552625 | Bowling | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6564238 | Kim et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6633970 | Clift et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6634020 | Bates et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6643150 | Kawakami | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6658578 | Laurenti et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6681280 | Miyake et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6694398 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6724169 | Majumdar et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6728856 | Grosbach et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6751742 | Duhault et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6763478 | Bui | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6862635 | Alverson et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 20010013117 | Ungar | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20020194466 | Catherwood et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030093656 | Masse et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20040150439 | Greenfeld | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20070038826 | Dieffenderfer et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070113046 | Vorbach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20080028262 | Gellerich | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 554 917 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 0 855 643 | Jul 1998 | EP |
| 0 992 888 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 0 992 889 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 01037424 | Feb 1989 | JP |
| 9611443 | Apr 1996 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050172109 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09870446 | Jun 2001 | US |
| Child | 11016798 | US |