The present invention relates to localization of a position during neurosurgery. The present invention relates more specifically to electromagnetic localization of a position during stereotactic neurosurgery, such as brain surgery and spinal surgery.
Precise localization of a position is important to stereotactic neurosurgery. In addition, minimizing invasiveness of surgery is important to reduce health risks for a patient. Stereotactic surgery minimizes invasiveness of surgical procedures by allowing a device to be guided through tissue that has been localized by preoperative scanning techniques, such as for example, MR, CT, ultrasound, fluoro and PET. Recent developments in stereotactic surgery have increased localization precision and helped minimize invasiveness of surgery.
Stereotactic neurosurgery is now commonly used in neurosurgery of the brain. Such methods typically involve acquiring image data by placing fiducial markers on the patient's head, scanning the patient's head, attaching a headring to the patient's head, and determining the spacial relation of the image data to the headring by, for example, registration of the fiducial markers. Registration of the fiducial markers relates the information in the scanned image data for the patient's brain to the brain itself, and involves one-to-one mapping between the fiducial markers as identified in the image data and the fiducial markers that remain on the patient's head after scanning and throughout surgery. This is referred to as registering image space to patient space. Often, the image space must also be registered to another image space. Registration is accomplished through knowledge of the coordinate vectors of at least three non-collinear points in the image space and the patient space.
Currently, registration for image guided surgery can be completed by different methods. First, point-to-point registration is accomplished by identifying points in image space and then touching the same points in patient space. Second, surface registration involves the user's generation of a surface (e.g., the patient's forehead) in patient space by either selecting multiple points or scanning, and then accepting or rejecting the best fit to that surface in image space, as chosen by the processor. Third, repeat fixation devices entail the user repeatedly removing and replacing a device in known relation to the fiducial markers. Such registration methods have additional steps during the procedure, and therefore increase the complexity of the system and increase opportunities for introduction of human error.
It is known to adhere the fiducial markers to a patient's skin or alternatively to implant the fiducial markers into a patient's bone for use during stereotactic surgery. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,595,193 discloses an apparatus and method for creating a hole that does not penetrate the entire thickness of a segment of bone and is sized to accommodate a fiducial marker. A fiducial marker may then be inserted into the hole and image data may be acquired.
Through the image data, quantitative coordinates of targets within the patient's body can be specified relative to the fiducial markers. Once a guide probe or other instrument has been registered to the fiducial markers on the patient's body, the instrument can be navigated through the patient's body using image data.
It is also known to display large, three-dimensional data sets of image data in an operating room or in the direct field of view of a surgical microscope. Accordingly, a graphical representation of instrument navigation through the patient's body is displayed on a computer screen based on reconstructed images of scanned image data.
Although scanners provide valuable information for stereotactic surgery, improved accuracy in defining the position of the target with respect to an accessible reference location can be desirable. Inaccuracies in defining the target position can create inaccuracies in placing a therapeutic probe. One method for attempting to limit inaccuracies in defining the target position involves fixing the patient's head to the scanner to preserve the reference. Such a requirement is uncomfortable for the patient and creates other inconveniences, particularly if surgical procedures are involved. Consequently, a need exists for a system utilizing a scanner to accurately locate positions of targets, which allows the patient to be removed from the scanner.
Stereotactic neurosurgery utilizing a three-dimensional digitizer allows a patient to be removed from the scanner while still maintaining accuracy for locating the position of targets. The three-dimensional digitizer is used as a localizer to determine the intra-procedural relative positions of the target. Three-dimensional digitizers may employ optical, acoustic, electromagnetic, conductive or other known three-dimensional navigation technology for navigation through the patient space.
Stereotactic surgery techniques are also utilized for spinal surgery in order to increase accuracy of the surgery and minimize invasiveness. Accuracy is particularly difficult in spinal surgery and must be accommodated in registration and localization techniques utilized in the surgery. Prior to spinal surgery, the vertebra are scanned to determine their alignment and positioning. During imaging, scans are taken at intervals through the vertebra to create a three-dimensional pre-procedural data set for the vertebra. After scanning the patient is moved to the operating table, which can cause repositioning of the vertebra. In addition, the respective positions of the vertebra may shift once the patient has been immobilized on the operating table because, unlike the brain, the spine is not held relatively still in the same way as a skull-like enveloping structure. Even normal patient respiration may cause relative movement of the vertebra.
Computer processes discriminate the image data retrieved by scanning the spine so that the body vertebra remain in memory. Once the vertebra are each defined as a single rigid body, the vertebra can be repositioned with software algorithms that define a displaced image data set. Each rigid body element has at least three fiducial markers that are visible on the pre-procedural images and accurately detectable during the procedure. It is preferable to select reference points on the spinous process that are routinely exposed during such surgery. See also, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,871,445, WO 96/11624, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,592,939 and 5,697,377, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
To enhance the prior art, and in accordance with the purposes of the invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, there is provided a system for displaying relative positions of two structures during a procedure on a body. The system comprises memory for storing an image data set representing the position of the body based on scans of the body, the image data set having a plurality of data points in known relation to a plurality of reference points for the body; a magnetic field generator for generating a magnetic field to be sensed by one or more magnetic field sensors placed in known relation to the reference points of the body for detecting the magnetic field and for generating positional signals in response to the detected magnetic field; a processor for receiving the reference signals and for ascertaining a location of the magnetic field sensors based upon the reference signals, the processor for generating a displaced image data set representing the relative positions of the body elements during the procedure; and a display utilizing the displaced image data set generated by the processor to display the relative position of the body elements during the procedure.
The present invention also provides a method for use during a procedure on a body. The method generates a display representing relative positions of two structures during the procedure. The method comprises the steps of storing an image data set in memory, the image data set representing the position of the body based on scans taken of the body prior to the procedure; reading the image data set stored in the memory, the image data set having a plurality of data points in known relation to a plurality of reference points for at least one of the two structures; placing one or more magnetic field sensors in known relation to the reference points of the two structures; generating a magnetic field; detecting the magnetic field with the magnetic field sensors; ascertaining the locations of the sensors based upon the magnetic field detected by the sensors and processing the locations of the sensors to generate a displaced image data set representing the relative position of the two structures during the procedure; and generating a display based on the displaced image data set illustrating the relative position of the two structures during the procedure.
The present invention further includes a device for use in a system for displaying relative positions of two structures during a procedure on a body. The device comprises a base adapted for attachment to the body, a fiducial marker mounted to the base, and a sensor having a known location and orientation with respect to the fiducial marker.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned from practice of the invention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by the apparatus particularly pointed out in the written description and claims herein as well as the appended drawings.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute part of the specification, illustrate a presently preferred embodiment of the invention and together with the general description given above and detailed description of the preferred embodiment given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
In accordance with the present invention, a method for use during a procedure on a body generates a display representing relative positions of two structures during the procedure. The method comprises the steps of (i) storing an image data set in memory, the image data set representing the position of the body based on scans taken of the body prior to the procedure; (ii) reading the image data set stored in the memory, the image data set having a plurality of data points in known relation to a plurality of reference points for at least one of the two structures; (iii) placing one or more magnetic field sensors in known relation to the reference points of the two structures; (iv) generating a magnetic field; (v) detecting the magnetic field with the magnetic field sensors; (vi) ascertaining the locations of the sensors based upon the magnetic field detected by the sensors and processing the locations of the sensors to generate a displaced image data set representing the relative position of the two structures during the procedure; and (vii) generating a display based on the displaced image data set illustrating the relative position of the two structures during the procedure. The relation of the plurality of data points to the plurality of reference points is determined by the user or by standard image processing of shape detection.
The two structures can be body elements (e.g., vertebrae of the spine) or a body element (e.g., a brain or a vertebrae) and a medical instrument such as a probe.
Initially, at least one fiducial marker 20 is placed on patient's head 30. A pre-operative scan is taken of the patient's head 30, preferably using at least one of MR, CT, ultrasound, fluoro and PET. The scan generates an image data set that is placed into the memory of a computer system 40. The image data set represents the position of the patient's head 30 based on the pre-operative scans of the head. The image data set includes a plurality of data points.
During the procedure, at least one magnetic field sensor 50 is placed in known relation to the at least one fiducial marker 20 on the patient's head 30. For example, the magnetic field sensor can be integrated with the fiducial marker, attached to the fiducial marker, or interchanged with the fiducial marker. Another magnetic field sensor 50 can be placed, for example, in a medical instrument 60. The medical instrument 60 does not need a fiducial marker because it is not present in the scan taken to create the image data set.
During the procedure, a magnetic field generator (not shown) generates a magnetic field in the area of the patient. For example, coils (not shown) can be embedded into an operating table 42 on which the patient is placed. The magnetic field sensors 50 on the patient's head 30 and in the medical instrument 60 detect the generated magnetic field and send appropriate signals to the processor 45 so that the processor 45 can determine the positions of the magnetic field sensors 50 during the procedure. Once the processor 45 determines the positions of the magnetic field sensors 50 on the patient's head 30, the position of the magnetic field sensors 50 on the patient's head is registered to the position of the fiducial markers 20 as represented in the scan.
After the position of the magnetic field sensors 50 has been determined and the sensors on the patient's head 30 are registered, a displaced image data set is created and displayed on a monitor 48. The display includes the relative position of the medical device 60 to the patient's head 30.
A variety of fiducial markers 20 and magnetic field sensors 50 (combined to create “fiducial marker-sensor devices”) are illustrated in
In
The preferred size of the spherical fiducial marker is dependent upon scan slice thickness. For example, with 1 mm slices, a 3 mm sphere is preferred and for 3 mm slices an 8 mm sphere is preferred. As can be see in
In
As stated above, the preferred size of the spherical fiducial marker is dependent upon scan slice thickness, and the spherical fiducial marker 356 is preferably (but not necessarily) spaced from the base a distance greater than the slice thickness to provide a barrier.
The present invention contemplates use of a fiducial marker having a unique geometrical shape in any of the embodiments of the fiducial marker-sensor device described hereinabove. In addition, the present invention contemplates placement of multiple fiducial markers on the patient and attachment of sensors to a subset of the fiducial markers that the user finds are most clearly and helpfully represented in the scan. Placement of additional sensors helps ensure that a proper number of sensors can be placed on the patient even if one or more fiducial markers are not clearly identifiable in the scan.
One exemplary embodiment of the method of the present invention utilizes at least one fiducial marker-sensor device. The user places at least one fiducial marker with a unique geometric shape on the patient's head 30. One example of the unique geometrical shape contemplated by the present invention includes at least three distinct non-collinear points, and may include more points to increase the accuracy of the system in correlating patient space to image space. Examples of presently preferred unique geometric shapes including more than three non-collinear points are illustrated in
Alternatively, the user may place at least two fiducial markers with predetermined geometrical shapes (see
As another alternative, the user may place at least three fiducial markers on the patient's head 30. The location of the fiducial markers can be determined from the image slices and with a combination of sensors to define six DOF (e.g., two five DOF sensors). The image slices represent at least the location of the fiducial markers in image space and the sensor determines at least the corresponding location of the fiducial markers in patient space to accomplish auto-registration. The sensors are preferably electromagnetic.
In yet another alternative, the user may place at least three fiducial markers on the patient's head 30. In this embodiment including at least three fiducial markers, the fiducial markers need not have a unique geometrical shape. Exemplary embodiments of fiducial markers that do not have a unique geometrical shape are illustrated in
As stated above, once fiducial markers 20 have been placed on the patient's head, image slices or a three-dimensional scan (e.g., MR, CT, ultrasound, fluoro and PET) are taken of the patient's head to create a three-dimensional data set having data points corresponding to reference points on the fiducial marker(s) 20. The relation of the plurality of data points to the plurality of reference points is determined by the user or by standard image processing of shape detection. The scan is preferably taken prior to or during the procedure. An image data set is created by the scan and placed in computer memory, and the processor 45 identifies the fiducial marker(s) in image space (in the image data set) using image algorithms. Each fiducial marker is represented by at least one data point in the image data set.
Preferably, the image data set is created prior to placing the patient on the operating table. Once the patient is ready for surgery, the processor 45 can identify the fiducial marker(s) 20 in patient space using signals received from the sensors 50 on the patient's head 30. Each fiducial marker includes least one reference point 70 in patient space (see exemplary fiducial markers illustrated in
Auto-registering the patient provides a simplified and more user-friendly system because the user need not select the data points in the data set and thereafter touch fiducial markers, or create a surface in patient space by selecting multiple points or scanning and then accept or reject the best fit in image space as determined by the processor, or repeatedly remove and replace a localizing device. In addition, accuracy can be enhanced because opportunities for human error during user registration is eliminated.
During the procedure, at least one sensor 50 is placed in known relation to the fiducial marker(s) 20 on patient's head to create a dynamic reference frame for the procedure. Preferably, the at least one sensor is integrated with the fiducial marker(s), removably attached to the fiducial marker(s), permanently affixed to the fiducial marker(s) after the patient is scanned, or interchanged with the fiducial marker(s) during the procedure. In a preferred embodiment of the invention in which a single uniquely shaped fiducial marker with ascertainable location and orientation is utilized (see
During the procedure, the computer system dynamically tracks movement of the sensors 50 on the patient's head 30 and on the medical instrument 60. Thus, the system tracks movement of the medical instrument 60 relative to the patient's head 30. In addition, the system can “learn the geometry” of sensors placed on the patient's head to perform geometry checks that help maintain system accuracy. To learn the geometry of the sensors 50 on the patient's head, the processor 45 determines the relative locations of all of the sensors 50 on the patient's head. The relative locations of the sensors on the patient's head should not change. If the processor determines that the relative location of sensors on the patient's head has changed, the system indicates to the user that an error may have occurred. By using the magnetic field sensors as a dynamic reference frame, the system need not employ additional navigational devices in the surgical field.
As the system tracks relative movement of two structures such as the patient's head and the medical instrument, a graphical representation of instrument navigation through the patient's brain is displayed on a monitor 48 of the computer system 40 based on reconstructed images of scanned image data.
An exemplary embodiment of a medical instrument for use in the present invention is illustrated in
When using the registration system of the present invention during spinal surgery, the systems ability to track relative movement of multiple structures is particularly important for at least the following reason. Prior to spinal surgery, the vertebra are scanned to determine their alignment and positioning. During imaging, scans are taken at intervals through the vertebra to create a three-dimensional pre-procedural data set for the vertebra. However, after scanning the patient must be moved to the operating table, causing repositioning of the vertebra. In addition, the respective positions of the vertebra may shift once the patient has been immobilized on the operating table because, unlike the brain, the spine is not held relatively still by a skull-like enveloping structure. Even normal patient respiration may cause relative movement of the vertebra.
Preferably, the image data set is created prior to placing the patient on the operating table. Once the patient is ready for surgery, the processor 45 can identify the fiducial marker 20 in patient space using signals received from at least one sensor 50, placed in known relation to the fiducial marker(s) 20 placed on the patient's vertebra 610. As described above, the system then auto-registers the patient by correlating the reference points to the data points. According to the present invention, the fiducial marker-sensor devices illustrated with respect to brain surgery are equally acceptable for spinal surgery.
During the procedure, the computer system dynamically tracks movement of each sensor 50 on the patient's vertebra and on the medical instrument 60. Thus, the system tracks alignment and positioning of the vertebra 610 (e.g., relative movement of the vertebra) as well as movement of the medical instrument 60 relative to the vertebrae. In addition, the system can “learn the geometry” of sensors placed on a single to perform geometry checks that help maintain system accuracy as described above.
As the system tracks relative movement of vertebra 610 and the medical instrument 60, a graphical representation of instrument navigation through the patient's spinous process is displayed on a monitor 48 of the computer system 40 based on reconstructed images of scanned image data.
An exemplary embodiment of a medical instrument for use in the present invention is illustrated in
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the registration system of the present invention and in construction of this registration system without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. As an example a variety of other embodiments of the fiducial marker-sensor device could be employed, including fiducial markers of an endless variety of shapes and sizes. The magnetic field generator and sensor roles could be reversed, such that the operating table 42 could include a sensor, and field generators could be placed on the patient and in the medical device. In addition, an optical, acoustic or inertial system could be used to track the location of the sensors and fiducial markers instead of electromagnetics.
Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/103,685, filed Mar. 21, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,657,300, issued on Feb. 2, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 6,381,485, issued on Apr. 30, 2002, the applications which are hereby incorporated by reference herein. The following United States patent applications, which were concurrently filed with this one on Oct. 28, 1999, are fully incorporated herein by reference: Method and System for Navigating a Catheter Probe in the Presence of Field-influencing Objects, by Michael Martinelli, Paul Kessman and Brad Jascob; Patient-shielding and Coil System, by Michael Martinelli, Paul Kessman and Brad Jascob; Navigation Information Overlay onto Ultrasound Imagery, by Paul Kessman, Troy Holsing and Jason Trobaugh; Coil Structures and Methods for Generating Magnetic Fields, by Brad Jascob, Paul Kessman and Michael Martinelli; Registration of Human Anatomy Integrated for Electromagnetic Localization, by Mark W. Hunter and Paul Kessman; System for Translation of Electromagnetic and Optical Localization Systems, by Mark W. Hunter and Paul Kessman; Surgical Communication and Power System, by Mark W. Hunter, Paul Kessman and Brad Jascob; and Surgical Sensor, by Mark W. Hunter, Sheri McCoid and Paul Kessman.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1576781 | Phillips | Mar 1926 | A |
1735726 | Bornhardt | Nov 1929 | A |
2407845 | Nemeyer | Sep 1946 | A |
2650588 | Drew | Sep 1953 | A |
2697433 | Sehnder | Dec 1954 | A |
3016899 | Stenvall | Jan 1962 | A |
3017887 | Heyer | Jan 1962 | A |
3061936 | Dobbeleer | Nov 1962 | A |
3073310 | Mocarski | Jan 1963 | A |
3109588 | Polhemus et al. | Nov 1963 | A |
3294083 | Alderson | Dec 1966 | A |
3367326 | Frazier | Feb 1968 | A |
3439256 | Kahne | Apr 1969 | A |
3577160 | White | May 1971 | A |
3614950 | Rabey | Oct 1971 | A |
3644825 | Davis, Jr. et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3674014 | Tillander | Jul 1972 | A |
3702935 | Carey et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3704707 | Halloran | Dec 1972 | A |
3821469 | Whetstone et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3868565 | Kuipers | Feb 1975 | A |
3941127 | Froning | Mar 1976 | A |
3983474 | Kuipers | Sep 1976 | A |
4017858 | Kuipers | Apr 1977 | A |
4037592 | Kronner | Jul 1977 | A |
4052620 | Brunnett | Oct 1977 | A |
4054881 | Raab | Oct 1977 | A |
4117337 | Staats | Sep 1978 | A |
4173228 | Van Steenwyk et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4182312 | Mushabac | Jan 1980 | A |
4202349 | Jones | May 1980 | A |
4228799 | Anichkov et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4256112 | Kopf et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4262306 | Renner | Apr 1981 | A |
4287809 | Egli et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4298874 | Kuipers | Nov 1981 | A |
4314251 | Raab | Feb 1982 | A |
4317078 | Weed et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4319136 | Jinkins | Mar 1982 | A |
4328548 | Crow et al. | May 1982 | A |
4328813 | Ray | May 1982 | A |
4339953 | Iwasaki | Jul 1982 | A |
4341220 | Perry | Jul 1982 | A |
4346384 | Raab | Aug 1982 | A |
4358856 | Stivender et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4368536 | Pfeiler | Jan 1983 | A |
4396885 | Constant | Aug 1983 | A |
4396945 | DiMatteo et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4403321 | Kruger | Sep 1983 | A |
4418422 | Richter et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4419012 | Stephenson et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4422041 | Lienau | Dec 1983 | A |
4431005 | McCormick | Feb 1984 | A |
4485815 | Amplatz et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4506676 | Duska | Mar 1985 | A |
4543959 | Sepponen | Oct 1985 | A |
4548208 | Niemi | Oct 1985 | A |
4571834 | Fraser et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4572198 | Codrington | Feb 1986 | A |
4583538 | Onik et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4584577 | Temple | Apr 1986 | A |
4608977 | Brown | Sep 1986 | A |
4613866 | Blood | Sep 1986 | A |
4617925 | Laitinen | Oct 1986 | A |
4618978 | Cosman | Oct 1986 | A |
4621628 | Brudermann | Nov 1986 | A |
4625718 | Olerud et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4638798 | Shelden et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4642786 | Hansen | Feb 1987 | A |
4645343 | Stockdale et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4649504 | Krouglicof et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4651732 | Frederick | Mar 1987 | A |
4653509 | Oloff et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4659971 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4660970 | Ferrano | Apr 1987 | A |
4673352 | Hansen | Jun 1987 | A |
4688037 | Krieg | Aug 1987 | A |
4701049 | Beckman et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4705395 | Hageniers | Nov 1987 | A |
4705401 | Addleman et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4706665 | Gouda | Nov 1987 | A |
4709156 | Murphy et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4710708 | Rorden et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4719419 | Dawley | Jan 1988 | A |
4722056 | Roberts et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4722336 | Kim et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4723544 | Moore et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4727565 | Ericson | Feb 1988 | A |
RE32619 | Damadian | Mar 1988 | E |
4733969 | Case et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4737032 | Addleman et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4737794 | Jones | Apr 1988 | A |
4737921 | Goldwasser et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4742356 | Kuipers | May 1988 | A |
4742815 | Ninan et al. | May 1988 | A |
4743770 | Lee | May 1988 | A |
4743771 | Sacks et al. | May 1988 | A |
4745290 | Frankel et al. | May 1988 | A |
4750487 | Zanetti | Jun 1988 | A |
4753528 | Hines et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4761072 | Pryor | Aug 1988 | A |
4764016 | Johansson | Aug 1988 | A |
4771787 | Wurster et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4779212 | Levy | Oct 1988 | A |
4782239 | Hirose et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4788481 | Niwa | Nov 1988 | A |
4791934 | Brunnett | Dec 1988 | A |
4793355 | Crum et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4794262 | Sato et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4797907 | Anderton | Jan 1989 | A |
4803976 | Frigg et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4804261 | Kirschen | Feb 1989 | A |
4805615 | Carol | Feb 1989 | A |
4809694 | Ferrara | Mar 1989 | A |
4821200 | Oberg | Apr 1989 | A |
4821206 | Arora | Apr 1989 | A |
4821731 | Martinelli et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4822163 | Schmidt | Apr 1989 | A |
4825091 | Breyer et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4829373 | Leberl et al. | May 1989 | A |
4836778 | Baumrind et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4838265 | Cosman et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4841967 | Chang et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4845771 | Wislocki et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4849692 | Blood | Jul 1989 | A |
4860331 | Williams et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4862893 | Martinelli | Sep 1989 | A |
4869247 | Howard, III et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4875165 | Fencil et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4875478 | Chen | Oct 1989 | A |
4884566 | Mountz et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4889526 | Rauscher et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4896673 | Rose et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4905698 | Strohl, Jr. et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4923459 | Nambu | May 1990 | A |
4931056 | Ghajar et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4945305 | Blood | Jul 1990 | A |
4945914 | Allen | Aug 1990 | A |
4951653 | Fry et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4955891 | Carol | Sep 1990 | A |
4961422 | Marchosky et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4977655 | Martinelli | Dec 1990 | A |
4989608 | Ratner | Feb 1991 | A |
4991579 | Allen | Feb 1991 | A |
5002058 | Martinelli | Mar 1991 | A |
5005592 | Cartmell | Apr 1991 | A |
5013317 | Cole et al. | May 1991 | A |
5016639 | Allen | May 1991 | A |
5017139 | Mushabac | May 1991 | A |
5027818 | Bova et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5030196 | Inoue | Jul 1991 | A |
5030222 | Calandruccio et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5031203 | Trecha | Jul 1991 | A |
5042486 | Pfeiler et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5047036 | Koutrouvelis | Sep 1991 | A |
5050608 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5054492 | Scribner et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5057095 | Fabian | Oct 1991 | A |
5059789 | Salcudean | Oct 1991 | A |
5078140 | Kwoh | Jan 1992 | A |
5079699 | Tuy et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5086401 | Glassman et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5094241 | Allen | Mar 1992 | A |
5097839 | Allen | Mar 1992 | A |
5098426 | Sklar et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5099845 | Besz et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5099846 | Hardy | Mar 1992 | A |
5105829 | Fabian et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5107839 | Houdek et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5107843 | Aarnio et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5107862 | Fabian et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5109194 | Cantaloube | Apr 1992 | A |
5119817 | Allen | Jun 1992 | A |
5142930 | Allen et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5143076 | Hardy et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152288 | Hoenig et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5160337 | Cosman | Nov 1992 | A |
5161536 | Vilkomerson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5178164 | Allen | Jan 1993 | A |
5178621 | Cook et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5186174 | Schlondorff et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5187475 | Wagener et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5188126 | Fabian et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5190059 | Fabian et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5193106 | DeSena | Mar 1993 | A |
5197476 | Nowacki et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197965 | Cherry et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5198768 | Keren | Mar 1993 | A |
5198877 | Schulz | Mar 1993 | A |
5207688 | Carol | May 1993 | A |
5211164 | Allen | May 1993 | A |
5211165 | Dumoulin et al. | May 1993 | A |
5211176 | Ishiguro et al. | May 1993 | A |
5212720 | Landi et al. | May 1993 | A |
5214615 | Bauer | May 1993 | A |
5219351 | Teubner et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5222499 | Allen et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5224049 | Mushabac | Jun 1993 | A |
5228442 | Imran | Jul 1993 | A |
5230338 | Allen et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5230623 | Guthrie et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5233990 | Barnea | Aug 1993 | A |
5237996 | Waldman et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5249581 | Horbal et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5251127 | Raab | Oct 1993 | A |
5251635 | Dumoulin et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5253647 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5255680 | Darrow et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5257636 | White | Nov 1993 | A |
5257998 | Ota et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5261404 | Mick et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5265610 | Darrow et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5265611 | Hoenig et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269759 | Hernandez et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5271400 | Dumoulin et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5273025 | Sakiyama et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5274551 | Corby, Jr. | Dec 1993 | A |
5279309 | Taylor et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5285787 | Machida | Feb 1994 | A |
5291199 | Overman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5291889 | Kenet et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5295483 | Nowacki et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297549 | Beatty et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299253 | Wessels | Mar 1994 | A |
5299254 | Dancer et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299288 | Glassman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300080 | Clayman et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305091 | Gelbart et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305203 | Raab | Apr 1994 | A |
5306271 | Zinreich et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307072 | Jones, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5309913 | Kormos et al. | May 1994 | A |
5315630 | Sturm et al. | May 1994 | A |
5316024 | Hirschi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318025 | Dumoulin et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5320111 | Livingston | Jun 1994 | A |
5325728 | Zimmerman et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5325873 | Hirschi et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5329944 | Fabian et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5330485 | Clayman et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5333168 | Fernandes et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5353795 | Souza et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5353800 | Pohndorf et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5353807 | DeMarco | Oct 1994 | A |
5359417 | Muller et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5368030 | Zinreich et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371778 | Yanof et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5375596 | Twiss et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5377678 | Dumoulin et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383454 | Bucholz | Jan 1995 | A |
5385146 | Goldreyer | Jan 1995 | A |
5385148 | Lesh et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386828 | Owens et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5389101 | Heilbrun et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5391199 | Ben-Haim | Feb 1995 | A |
5394457 | Leibinger et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5394875 | Lewis et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5397329 | Allen | Mar 1995 | A |
5398684 | Hardy | Mar 1995 | A |
5399146 | Nowacki et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5400384 | Fernandes et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402801 | Taylor | Apr 1995 | A |
5408409 | Glassman et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413573 | Koivukangas | May 1995 | A |
5417210 | Funda et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419325 | Dumoulin et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423334 | Jordan | Jun 1995 | A |
5425367 | Shapiro et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425382 | Golden et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5426683 | O'Farrell, Jr. et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5426687 | Goodall et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5427097 | Depp | Jun 1995 | A |
5429132 | Guy et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5433198 | Desai | Jul 1995 | A |
RE35025 | Anderton | Aug 1995 | E |
5437277 | Dumoulin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443066 | Dumoulin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443489 | Ben-Haim | Aug 1995 | A |
5444756 | Pai et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445144 | Wodicka et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445150 | Dumoulin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445166 | Taylor | Aug 1995 | A |
5446548 | Gerig et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447154 | Cinquin et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5448610 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5453686 | Anderson | Sep 1995 | A |
5456718 | Szymaitis | Oct 1995 | A |
5457641 | Zimmer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458718 | Venkitachalam | Oct 1995 | A |
5464446 | Dreessen et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5469847 | Zinreich et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5478341 | Cook et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5478343 | Ritter | Dec 1995 | A |
5480422 | Ben-Haim | Jan 1996 | A |
5480439 | Bisek et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483961 | Kelly et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485849 | Panescu et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5487391 | Panescu | Jan 1996 | A |
5487729 | Avellanet et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5487757 | Truckai et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5490196 | Rudich et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5494034 | Schlondorff et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5503416 | Aoki et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5513637 | Twiss et al. | May 1996 | A |
5514146 | Lam et al. | May 1996 | A |
5515160 | Schulz et al. | May 1996 | A |
5517990 | Kalfas et al. | May 1996 | A |
5531227 | Schneider | Jul 1996 | A |
5531520 | Grimson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542938 | Avellanet et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5543951 | Moehrmann | Aug 1996 | A |
5546940 | Panescu et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5546949 | Frazin et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5546951 | Ben-Haim | Aug 1996 | A |
5551429 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558091 | Acker et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5566681 | Manwaring et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568384 | Robb et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568809 | Ben-haim | Oct 1996 | A |
5572999 | Funda et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5573533 | Strul | Nov 1996 | A |
5575794 | Walus et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575798 | Koutrouvelis | Nov 1996 | A |
5583909 | Hanover | Dec 1996 | A |
5588430 | Bova et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590215 | Allen | Dec 1996 | A |
5592939 | Martinelli | Jan 1997 | A |
5595193 | Walus et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596228 | Anderton et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600330 | Blood | Feb 1997 | A |
5603318 | Heilbrun et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611025 | Lorensen et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5617462 | Spratt | Apr 1997 | A |
5617857 | Chader et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5619261 | Anderton | Apr 1997 | A |
5622169 | Golden et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5622170 | Schulz | Apr 1997 | A |
5627873 | Hanover et al. | May 1997 | A |
5628315 | Vilsmeier et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630431 | Taylor | May 1997 | A |
5636255 | Ellis et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5636644 | Hart et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5638819 | Manwaring et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640170 | Anderson | Jun 1997 | A |
5642395 | Anderton et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643268 | Vilsmeier et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645065 | Shapiro et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646524 | Gilboa | Jul 1997 | A |
5647361 | Damadian | Jul 1997 | A |
5662111 | Cosman | Sep 1997 | A |
5664001 | Tachibana et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674296 | Bryan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676673 | Ferre et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681260 | Ueda et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682886 | Delp et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5682890 | Kormos et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690108 | Chakeres | Nov 1997 | A |
5694945 | Ben-Haim | Dec 1997 | A |
5695500 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695501 | Carol et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697377 | Wittkampf | Dec 1997 | A |
5702406 | Vilsmeier et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706811 | Takeda et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711299 | Manwaring et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713946 | Ben-Haim | Feb 1998 | A |
5715822 | Watkins et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5715836 | Kliegis et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718241 | Ben-Haim et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5727552 | Ryan | Mar 1998 | A |
5727553 | Saad | Mar 1998 | A |
5729129 | Acker | Mar 1998 | A |
5730129 | Darrow et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5730130 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732703 | Kalfas et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735278 | Hoult et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5738096 | Ben-Haim | Apr 1998 | A |
5740802 | Nafis et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741214 | Ouchi et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742394 | Hansen | Apr 1998 | A |
5744953 | Hansen | Apr 1998 | A |
5748767 | Raab | May 1998 | A |
5749362 | Funda et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749835 | Glantz | May 1998 | A |
5752513 | Acker et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755725 | Druais | May 1998 | A |
RE35816 | Schulz | Jun 1998 | E |
5758667 | Slettenmark | Jun 1998 | A |
5762064 | Polvani | Jun 1998 | A |
5767669 | Hansen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767960 | Orman | Jun 1998 | A |
5769789 | Wang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769843 | Abela et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769861 | Vilsmeier | Jun 1998 | A |
5772594 | Barrick | Jun 1998 | A |
5775322 | Silverstein et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776064 | Kalfas et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782765 | Jonkman | Jul 1998 | A |
5787886 | Kelly et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792055 | McKinnon | Aug 1998 | A |
5795294 | Luber et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797849 | Vesely et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799055 | Peshkin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799099 | Wang et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800352 | Ferre et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800535 | Howard, III | Sep 1998 | A |
5802719 | O'Farrell, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5803089 | Ferre et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807252 | Hassfeld et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810008 | Dekel et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810728 | Kuhn | Sep 1998 | A |
5810735 | Halperin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820553 | Hughes | Oct 1998 | A |
5823192 | Kalend et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823958 | Truppe | Oct 1998 | A |
5828725 | Levinson | Oct 1998 | A |
5828770 | Leis et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829444 | Ferre et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5831260 | Hansen | Nov 1998 | A |
5833608 | Acker | Nov 1998 | A |
5834759 | Glossop | Nov 1998 | A |
5836954 | Heilbrun et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840024 | Taniguchi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840025 | Ben-Haim | Nov 1998 | A |
5843076 | Webster, Jr. et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848967 | Cosman | Dec 1998 | A |
5851183 | Bucholz | Dec 1998 | A |
5865846 | Bryan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868674 | Glowinski et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868675 | Henrion et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871445 | Bucholz | Feb 1999 | A |
5871455 | Ueno | Feb 1999 | A |
5871487 | Warner et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873822 | Ferre et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5882304 | Ehnholm et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884410 | Prinz | Mar 1999 | A |
5889834 | Vilsmeier et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891034 | Bucholz | Apr 1999 | A |
5891157 | Day et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904691 | Barnett et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907395 | Schulz et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913820 | Bladen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920395 | Schulz | Jul 1999 | A |
5921992 | Costales et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923727 | Navab | Jul 1999 | A |
5928248 | Acker | Jul 1999 | A |
5938603 | Ponzi | Aug 1999 | A |
5938694 | Jaraczewski et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947980 | Jensen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5947981 | Cosman | Sep 1999 | A |
5950629 | Taylor et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951475 | Gueziec et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951571 | Audette | Sep 1999 | A |
5954647 | Bova et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957844 | Dekel et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964796 | Imran | Oct 1999 | A |
5967980 | Ferre et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5967982 | Barnett | Oct 1999 | A |
5968047 | Reed | Oct 1999 | A |
5971997 | Guthrie et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976156 | Taylor et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980535 | Barnett et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983126 | Wittkampf | Nov 1999 | A |
5987349 | Schulz | Nov 1999 | A |
5987960 | Messner et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999837 | Messner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999840 | Grimson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001130 | Bryan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006126 | Cosman | Dec 1999 | A |
6006127 | Van Der Brug et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013087 | Adams et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014580 | Blume et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016439 | Acker | Jan 2000 | A |
6019725 | Vesely et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024695 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6050724 | Schmitz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059718 | Taniguchi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063022 | Ben-Haim | May 2000 | A |
6071288 | Carol et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6073043 | Schneider | Jun 2000 | A |
6076008 | Bucholz | Jun 2000 | A |
6096050 | Audette | Aug 2000 | A |
6104944 | Martinelli | Aug 2000 | A |
6118845 | Simon et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122538 | Sliwa, Jr. et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122541 | Cosman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6131396 | Duerr et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139183 | Graumann | Oct 2000 | A |
6147480 | Osadchy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149592 | Yanof et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156067 | Bryan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161032 | Acker | Dec 2000 | A |
6165181 | Heilbrun et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167296 | Shahidi | Dec 2000 | A |
6172499 | Ashe | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175756 | Ferre et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178345 | Vilsmeier et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194639 | Botella et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201387 | Govari | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203497 | Dekel et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211666 | Acker | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223067 | Vilsmeier et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233476 | Strommer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235038 | Hunter et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246231 | Ashe | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259942 | Westermann et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259943 | Cosman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273896 | Franck et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282437 | Franck et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285902 | Kienzle, III et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298262 | Franck et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314310 | Ben-Haim et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332089 | Acker et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333971 | McCrory et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6341231 | Ferre et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351659 | Vilsmeier | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6379302 | Kessman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381485 | Hunter et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6402762 | Hunter et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6405072 | Cosman | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424856 | Vilsmeier et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427314 | Acker | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6428547 | Vilsmeier et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434415 | Foley et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437567 | Schenck et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445943 | Ferre et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470207 | Simon et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474341 | Hunter et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478802 | Kienzle, III et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6484049 | Seeley et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490475 | Seeley et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493573 | Martinelli et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498944 | Ben-Haim et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499488 | Hunter et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6516046 | Frohlich et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527443 | Vilsmeier et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551325 | Neubauer et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6584174 | Schubert et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6609022 | Vilsmeier et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611700 | Vilsmeier et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6640128 | Vilsmeier et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6669635 | Kessman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675040 | Cosman | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694162 | Hartlep | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6701179 | Martinelli et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6747539 | Martinelli | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6968224 | Kessman et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7007699 | Martinelli et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7152608 | Hunter et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7657300 | Hunter et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7797032 | Martinelli et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20010007918 | Vilsmeier et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020095081 | Vilsmeier et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040024309 | Ferre et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20060036189 | Martinelli et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20100210939 | Hartmann et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100331671 | Martinelli et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
964149 | Mar 1975 | CA |
3042343 | Jun 1982 | DE |
3508730 | Sep 1986 | DE |
3717871 | Dec 1988 | DE |
3831278 | Mar 1989 | DE |
3838011 | Jul 1989 | DE |
4213426 | Oct 1992 | DE |
4225112 | Dec 1993 | DE |
4233978 | Apr 1994 | DE |
19715202 | Oct 1998 | DE |
19751761 | Oct 1998 | DE |
19832296 | Feb 1999 | DE |
19747427 | May 1999 | DE |
10085137 | Nov 2002 | DE |
0062941 | Oct 1982 | EP |
0119660 | Sep 1984 | EP |
0155857 | Sep 1985 | EP |
0319844 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0326768 | Aug 1989 | EP |
350996 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0359773 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0419729 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0427358 | May 1991 | EP |
0456103 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0469966 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0501993 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0581704 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0651968 | May 1995 | EP |
0655138 | May 1995 | EP |
0894473 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0908146 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0930046 | Jul 1999 | EP |
2417970 | Sep 1979 | FR |
2618211 | Jan 1989 | FR |
2094590 | Sep 1982 | GB |
2164856 | Apr 1986 | GB |
62327 | Jan 1983 | JP |
2765738 | Jun 1988 | JP |
63240851 | Oct 1988 | JP |
3267054 | Nov 1991 | JP |
6194639 | Jul 1994 | JP |
WO-8809151 | Dec 1988 | WO |
WO-8905123 | Jun 1989 | WO |
WO-9005494 | May 1990 | WO |
WO-9103982 | Apr 1991 | WO |
WO-9104711 | Apr 1991 | WO |
WO-9107726 | May 1991 | WO |
WO-9203090 | Mar 1992 | WO |
WO-9206645 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO-9404938 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO-9423647 | Oct 1994 | WO |
WO-9424933 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO-9507055 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO-9611624 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO-9632059 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9736192 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO-9749453 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO-9808554 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO-9838908 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO-9915097 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-9921498 | May 1999 | WO |
WO-9923956 | May 1999 | WO |
WO-9926549 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO-9927839 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO-9929253 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO-9933406 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO-9937208 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO-9938449 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO-9952094 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO-9960939 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO-0130437 | May 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Prestige Cervical Disc System Surgical Technique”, 12 pgs. |
Adams et al., “Orientation Aid for Head and Neck Surgeons,” Innov. Tech. Biol. Med., vol. 13, No. 4, 1992, pp. 409-424. |
Adams et al., Computer-Assisted Surgery, IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, pp. 43-51, (May 1990). |
Barrick et al., “Prophylactic Intramedullary Fixation of the Tibia for Stress Fracture in a Professional Athlete,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 241-244 (1992). |
Barrick et al., “Technical Difficulties with the Brooker-Wills Nail in Acute Fractures of the Femur,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 144-150 (1990). |
Barrick, “Distal Locking Screw Insertion Using a Cannulated Drill Bit: Technical Note,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 7, No. 3, 1993, pp. 248-251. |
Batnitzky et al., “Three-Dimensinal Computer Reconstructions of Brain Lesions from Surface Contours Provided by Computed Tomography: A Prospectus,” Neurosurgery, vol. 11, No. 1, Part 1, 1982, pp. 73-84. |
Benzel, E. et al., Magnetic Source Imaging: A Review of the Magnes System of Biomagnetic Technologies Incorporated, Neurosurgery, vol. 33, No. 2 (Aug. 1993). |
Bergstrom et al. Stereotaxic Computed Tomography, Am. J. Roentgenol, vol. 127 pp. 167-170 (1976). |
Bouazza-Marouf et al.; “Robotic-Assisted Internal Fixation of Femoral Fractures”, IMECHE., pp. 51-58 (1995). |
Brack et al., “Accurate X-ray Based Navigation in Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery,” CAR '98, pp. 716-722. |
BrainLab marketing brochures for Vector Vision (undated) (26 pages). |
Brown, R., M.D., A Stereotactic Head Frame for Use with CT Body Scanners, Investigative Radiology .Copyrgt. J.B. Lippincott Company, pp. 300-304 (Jul.-Aug. 1979). |
Bryan, “Bryan Cervical Disc System Single Level Surgical Technique”, Spinal Dynamics, 2002, pp. 1-33. |
Bucholz, R.D., et al. Image-guided surgical techniques for infections and trauma of the central nervous system, Neurosurg. Clinics of N.A., vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 187-200 (1996). |
Bucholz, R.D., et al., A Comparison of Sonic Digitizers Versus Light Emitting Diode-Based Localization, Interactive Image-Guided Neurosurgery, Chapter 16, pp. 179-200 (1993). |
Bucholz, R.D., et al., Intraoperative localization using a three dimensional optical digitizer, SPIE—The Intl. Soc. for Opt. Eng., vol. 1894, pp. 312-322 (Jan. 17-19, 1993). |
Bucholz, R.D., et al., Intraoperative Ultrasonic Brain Shift Monitor and Analysis, Stealth Station Marketing Brochure (2 pages) (undated). |
Bucholz, R.D., et al., The Correction of Stereotactic Inaccuracy Caused by Brain Shift Using an Intraoperative Ultrasound Device, First Joint Conference, Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medical Robotics andComputer-Assisted Surgery, Grenoble, France, pp. 459-466 (Mar. 19-22, 1997). |
Bucholz, R.D., et al., Variables affecting the accuracy of stereotactic localization using computerized tomography, J. Neurosurg., vol. 79, pp. 667-673 (1993). |
Champleboux et al., “Accurate Calibration of Cameras and Range Imaging Sensors: the NPBS Method,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nice, France, May 1992. |
Champleboux, “Utilisation de Fonctions Splines pour la Mise au Point D'un Capteur Tridimensionnel sans Contact,” Quelques Applications Medicales, Jul. 1991. |
Cinquin et al., “Computer Assisted Medical Interventions,” International Advanced Robotics Programme, Sep. 1989, pp. 63-65. |
Cinquin, P. et al., Computer Assisted Medical Interventions, IEEE, pp. 254-263 (May/Jun. 1995). |
Clarysse, P. et al., A Computer-Assisged System for 3-D Frameless Localization in Stereotaxic MRI, IEEE Trans. on Med. Imaging, vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 523-529 (Dec. 1991). |
Cutting M.D. et al., Optical Tracking of Bone Fragments During Craniofacial Surgery, Second Annual International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, pp. 221-225, (Nov. 1995). |
Feldmar et al., “3D-2D Projective Registration of Free-Form Curves and Surfaces,” Rapport de recherche (Inria Sophia Antipolis), 1994, pp. 1-44. |
Foley et al., “Fundamentals of Interactive Computer Graphics,” The Systems Programming Series, Chapter 7, Jul. 1984, pp. 245-266. |
Foley, K.T., et al., Image-guided Intraoperative Spinal Localization, Intraoperative Neuroprotection, Chapter 19, pp. 325-340 (1996). |
Foley, K.T., et al., The StealthStation: Three-Dimensional Image-Interactive Guidance for the Spine Surgeon, Spinal Frontiers, pp. 7-9 (Apr. 1996). |
Friets, E.M., et al. A Frameless Stereotaxic Operating Microscope for Neurosurgery, IEEE Trans. On Biomed. Eng., vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 608-617 (Jul. 1989). |
Gallen, C.C., et al., Intracranial Neurosurgery Guided by Functional Imaging, Surg. Neurol., vol. 42, pp. 523-530 (1994). |
Galloway, R.L., et al., Interactive Image-Guided Neurosurgery, IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., vol. 89, No. 12, pp. 1226-1231 (1992). |
Galloway, R.L., Jr. et al, Optical localization for interactive, image-guided neurosurgery, SPIE, vol. 2164, (May 1, 1994) pp. 137-145. |
Germano, “Instrumentation, Technique and Technology”, Neurosurgery, vol. 37, No. 2, Aug. 1995, pp. 348-350. |
Gildenberg et al., “Calculation of Stereotactic Coordinates from the Computed Tomographic Scan,” Neurosurgery, vol. 10, No. 5, May 1982, pp. 580-586. |
Gomez, C.R., et al., Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound Following Closed Head Injury: Vasospasm or Vasoparalysis?, Surg. Neurol., vol. 35, pp. 30-35 (1991). |
Gonzalez, “Digital Image Fundamentals,” Digital Image processing, Second Edition, 1987, pp. 52-54. |
Gottesfeld Brown et al., “Registration of Planar Film Radiographs with Computer Tomography,” Proceedings of MMBIA, Jun. '96, pp. 42-51. |
Grimson, W.E.L., An Automatic Registration Method for Frameless Stereotaxy, Image Guided Surgery, and enhanced Reality Visualization, IEEE, pp. 430-436 (1994). |
Grimson, W.E.L., et al., Virtual-reality technology is giving surgeons the equivalent of x-ray vision helping them to remove tumors more effectively, to minimize surgical wounds and to avoid damaging critical tissues, Sci. Amer., vol. 280, No. 6,pp. 62-69 (Jun. 1999). |
Gueziec et al., “Registration of Computed Tomography Data to a Surgical Robot Using Fluoroscopy: A Feasibility Study,” Computer Science/Mathematics, Sep. 27, 1996, 6 pages. |
Guthrie, B.L., Graphic-Interactive Cranial Surgery: the Operating Arm System, Handbook of Stereotaxy Using the CRW Apparatus, Chapter 13, (1994) pp. 193-211. |
Hamadeh et al, “Kinematic Study of Lumbar Spine Using Functional Radiographies and 3D/2D Registration,” TIMC UMR 5525—IMAG (1997). |
Hamadeh et al., “Automated 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic and Fluorscopic Image Registration,” Computer Aided Surgery (1998), 3:11-19. |
Hamadeh, A., et al., Toward automatic registration between CT and X-ray images: cooperation between 3D/2D registration and 2D edge detection, TIMC-IMAG, Faculte de Medecine de Grenoble, France, pp. 39-46 (1995) (Second Annual Intl. Symposium onMedical Robotics and Computer-Assisged Surgery, MRCAS '95, Nov. 4-7, 1995). |
Hardy, T., M.D., et al., CASS: A Program for Computer Assisted Stereotaxic Surgery, The Fifth Annual Symposium on Comptuer Applications in Medical Care, Proceedings, Nov. 1-4, 1981, IEEE, pp. 1116-1126, (1981). |
Hatch, “Reference-Display System for the Integration of CT Scanning and the Operating Microscope,” Thesis, Thayer School of Engineering, Oct. 1984, pp. 1-189. |
Hatch, J.F., Reference-Display System for the Integration of CT Scanning and the Operating Microscope, IEEE, vol. 8, pp. 252-254, Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference (Worcester, Massachusetts) (Mar. 14-15, 1985). |
Heilbrun, M.D., Progressive Technology Applications, Neurosurgery for the Third Millenium, Chapter 15, J. Whitaker & Sons, Ltd., Amer. Assoc. of Neurol. Surgeons, pp. 191-198 (1992). |
Heilbrun, M.P., Computed Tomography—Guided Stereotactic Systems, Clinical Neurosurgery, Chapter 31, pp. 564-581 (1983). |
Heilbrun, M.P., et al., Preliminary Experience with Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) computerized tomography stereotaxic guidance system, J. Neurosurg., vol. 59, pp. 217-222 (1983). |
Heilbrun, M.P., et al., Stereotactic Localization and Guidance Using a Machine Vision Technique, Sterotact & Funct. Neurosurg., Proceed. of the Mtg. of the Amer. Soc. for Sterot. and Funct. Neurosurg. (Pittsburgh, PA) vol. 58, pp. 94-98 (1992). |
Henderson, J.M., et al., an Accurate and Ergonomic Method of Registration for Image-guided Neurosurgery, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 273-277 (1994). |
Hoerenz, “The Operating Microscope I. Optical Principles, Illumination Systems, and Support Systems,” Journal of Microsurgery, vol. 1, 1980, pp. 364-369. |
Hofstetter, R., et al., Fluroscopy Based Surgical Navigation-Concept and Clinical Applications, Computer Assisged Radiology and Surgery, Car '97, Proceed. of the 11th Intl. Symp. and Exh., Berlin, pp. 956-960 (Jun. 25-28, 1997). |
Horner, N.B. et al., A Comparison of CT-Stereotaxic Brain Biopsy Techniques, Investig. Radiol., vol. 19, pp. 367-373 (Sep.-Oct. 1984). |
Hounsfield, “Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part 1. Description of system,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 46, No. 552, Dec. 1973, pp. 1016-1022. |
Jacques et al., “A Computerized Microstereotactic Method to Approach, 3-Dimensionally Reconstruct, Remove and Adjuvantly Treat Small Cns Lesions,” Applied Neurophysiology, vol. 43, 1980, pp. 176-182. |
Jacques et al., “Computerized three-dimensional stereotaxic removal of small central nervous system lesion in patients,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 53, Dec. 1980, pp. 816-820. |
Joskowicz et al., “Computer-Aided Image-Guided Bone Fracture Surgery: Concept and Implementation,” Car '98, pp. 710-715. |
Kall, B., The Impact of Computer and Imgaging Technology on Stereotactic Surgery, Proceedings of the Meeting of the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, pp. 10-22 (1987). |
Kato, A., et al., A frameless, armless navigational system for computer-assisted neurosurgery, J. Neurosurg., vol. 74, pp. 845-849 (May 1991). |
Kelly et al., “Computer-assisted stereotaxic laser resection of intra-axial brain neoplasms,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 64, Mar. 1986, pp. 427-439. |
Kelly et al., “Precision Resection of Intra-Axial CNA Lesions by CT-Based Stereotactic Craniotomy and Computer Monitored CO2 Laser,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 68, 1983, pp. 1-9. |
Kelly, P.J., Computer Assisted Stereotactic Biopsy and Volumetric Resection of Pediatric Brain Tumors, Brain Tumors in Children, Neurologic Clinics, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 317-336 (May 1991). |
Kelly, P.J., Computer-Directed Stereotactic Resection of Brain Tumors, Neurologica Operative Atlas, vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 299-313 (1991). |
Kelly, P.J., et al., Results of Computed Tomography-based Computer-assisted Stereotactic Resection of Metastatic Intracranial Tumors, Neurosurgery, vol. 22, No. 1, Part 1, 1988, pp. 717 (Jan. 1988). |
Kelly, P.J., Stereotactic Imaging, Surgical Planning and Computer-Assisted Resection of Intracranial Lesions: Methods and Results, Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery, vol. 17, pp. 78-118, (1990). |
Kim, W.S. et al., A Helmet Mounted Display for Telerobotics, IEEE, pp. 543-547 (1988). |
Klimek, L., et al., Long-Term Experience with Different Types of Localization Systems in Skull-Base Surgery, Ear, Nose & Throat Surgery, Chapter 51, (1996) pp. 635-638. |
Kosugi, Y., et al., An Articulated Neurosurgical Navigation System Using MRI and CT Images, IEEE Trans. on Biomed, Eng. vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 147-152 (Feb. 1988). |
Kosugi, Y., et al., An Articulated Neurosurgical Navigation System Using MRI and CT Images, IEEE Trans. on Biomed., Eng., vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 147-152 (Feb. 1988). |
Krybus, W., et al., Navigation Support for Surgery by Means of Optical Position Detection, Computer Assisted Radiology Proceed. of the Intl. Symp. CAR '91 Computed Assisted Radiology, pp. 362-366 (Jul. 3-6, 1991). |
Kwoh, Y.S., Ph.D., et al., A New Computerized Tomographic-Aided Robotic Stereotaxis System, Robotics Age, vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 17-22 (Jun. 1985). |
Laitinen et al., “An Adapter for Computed Tomography-Guided, Stereotaxis,” Surg. Neurol., 1985, pp. 559-566. |
Laitinen, “Noninvasive multipurpose stereoadapter,” Neurological Research, Jun. 1987, pp. 137-141. |
Lavallee et al, “Matching 3-D Smooth Surfaces with their 2-D Projections using 3-D Distance Maps,” SPIE, vol. 1570, Geometric Methods in Computer Vision, 1991, pp. 322-336. |
Lavallee et al., “Computer Assisted Driving of a Needle into the Brain,” Proceedings of the International Symposium CAR '89, Computer Assisted Radiology, 1989, pp. 416-420. |
Lavallee et al., “Matching of Medical Images for Computed and Robot Assisted Surgery,” IEEE EMBS, Orlando, 1991. |
Lavallee, “VI Adaption de la Methodologie a Quelques Applications Cliniques,” Chapitre VI, pp. 133-148. |
Lavallee, S., et al., A new system for computer assisted neurosurgery, IEEE EMBS, 11th Annual Intl. Conf., pp. 926-927 (1989). |
Lavallee, S., et al., Computer Assisted Interventionist Imaging: the Instance of Stereotactic Brain Surgery, MEDINFO 89, pp. 613-617 (1989). |
Lavallee, S., et al., Computer Assisted Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction First Clinical Tests, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, pp. 11-16 (Sep. 1994). |
Lavallee, S., et al., Computer Assisted Medical Interventions, NATO Asi Series, vol. F 60, 3d Imaging in Medic., pp. 301-312 (1990). |
Lavallee, S., et al., Computer Assisted Spine Surgery: a technique for accurate transpedicular screw fixation using CT data and a 3-D optical localizer, TIMC, Faculte de Medecine de Grenoble, J. of Image Guided Surg., vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 65-73 (1995). |
Lavallee, S., et al., Image guided operating robot: a clinical application in stereotactic neurosurgery, IEEE Rob. And Autom. Society, Proc. of the 1992 Intl. Conf. on Rob. And Autom., May 1992, pp. 618-624, First Intl. Symp. on Med. Rob. and Comp.Assisted Surg. (Pittsburg, PA) (Sep. 22-24, 1994). |
Leavitt, D.D., et al., Dynamic Field Shaping to Optimize Stereotactic Radiosurgery, I.J. Rad. Onc. Biol. Physc., vol. 21, pp. 1247-1255 (1991). |
Leksell et al., “Stereotaxis and Tomography—A Technical Note,” ACTA Neurochirurgica, vol. 52, 1980, pp. 1-7. |
Lemieux, L., et al., A patient-to-computed-tomography image registration method based on digitally reconstructed radiographs, Med. Phys., vol. 21, No. 11, pp. 1749-1760 (1994). |
Levin et al., “The Brain: Integrated Three-dimensional Display of MR and PET Images,” Radiology, vol. 172, No. 3, Sep. 1989, pp. 783-789 1. |
Maurer, Jr., et al., Registration of Head CT Images to Physical Space Using a Weighted Combination of Points and Surfaces, IEEE Trans. on Med. Imaging, vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 753-761 (Oct. 1998). |
Mazier et al., Chirurgie de la Colonne Vertebrale Assistee par Ordinateur: Appication au Vissage Pediculaire, Innov. Tech. Biol. Med., vol. 11, No. 5, 1990, pp. 559-566. |
Mazier, B., et al., Computer assisted interventionist imaging: application to the vertebral column surgery, Annual Intl. Conf. of the IEEE in Medic. and Biol. Soc., vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 430-431 (1990). |
McGirr, S., M.D., et al., Stereotactic Resection of Juvenile Pilocytic Astrocytomas of the Thalamus and Basal Ganglia, Neurosurgery, vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 447-452, (1987). |
Merloz, P., et al., Computer assisted Spine Surgery, Clinical Orthop. and Related Research, No. 337, pp. 86-96 (1997). |
Ng, W.S. et al., Robotic Surgery—A First-Hand Experience in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Surgery, IEEE Eng. in Med. and Biology, pp. 120-125 (Mar. 1993). |
Pelizzari , C.A., et al., Accurate Three-Dimensional Registration of CT, PET, and/or MR Images of the Brain, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 20-26 (Jan./Feb. 1989). |
Pelizzari et al., “Interactive 3D Patient-Image Registration,” Information Processing in Medical Imaging, 12th International Conference, IPMI '91, Jul. 7-12, 136-141 (A.C.F. Colchester et al. eds. 1991). |
Pelizzari et al., No. 528—“Three Dimensional Correlation of PET, CT and MRI Images,” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 28, No. 4, Apr. 1987, p. 682. |
Penn, R.D., et al., Stereotactic Surgery with Image Processing of Computerized Tomographic Scans, Neurosurgery, vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 157-163 (Sep.-Oct. 1978). |
Phillips et al., “Image Guided Orthopaedic Surgery Design and Analysis,” Trans Inst. MC, vol. 17, No. 5, 1995, pp. 251-264. |
Pixsys 3-D Digitizing Accessories, by Pixsys (marketing brochure)(undated) (2 pages). |
Potamianos et al., “Intra-Operative Imaging Guidance for Keyhole Surgery Methodology and Calibration,” First International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Sep. 22-24, 1994, pp. 98-104. |
Reinhardt et al., “CT-Guided ‘Real Time’ Stereotaxy,” ACTA Neurochirurgica, 1989. |
Reinhardt, H., et al., A Computer-Assisted Device for Intraoperative CT-Correlated Localization of Brain Tumors, pp. 51-58 (1988). |
Reinhardt, H.F. et al., Sonic Stereometry in Microsurgical Procedures for Deep-Seated Brain Tumors and Vascular Malformations, Neurosurgery, vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 51-57 (Jan. 1993). |
Reinhardt, H.F., et al., Mikrochirugische Entfernung tiefliegender Gefa.beta.mi.beta.bildungen mit Hilfe der Sonar-Stereometrie (Microsurgical Removal of Deep-Seated Vascular Malformations Using Sonar Stereometry). Ultraschall in Med. 12, pp. 80-83(1991). |
Reinhardt, Hans. F., Neuronavigation: A Ten-Year Review, Neurosurgery, (1996) pp. 329-341. |
Roberts, D.W., et al., A frameless stereotaxic integration of computerized tomographic imaging and the operating microscope. J. Neurosurg., vol. 65, pp. 545-549 (Oct. 1986). |
Rosenbaum et al., “Computerized Tomography Guided Stereotaxis: A New Approach,” Applied Neurophysiology, vol. 43, No. 3-5, 1980, pp. 172-173. |
Sautot, “Vissage Pediculaire Assiste Par Ordinateur,” Sep. 20, 1994. |
Schueler et al., “Correction of Image Intensifier Distortion for Three-Dimensional X-Ray Angiography,” SPIE Medical Imaging 1995, vol. 2432, pp. 272-279. |
Selvik et al., “A Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric System,” Acta Radiologica Diagnosis, 1983, pp. 343-352. |
Shelden et al., “Development of a computerized microsteroetaxic method for localization and removal of minute CNS lesions under direct 3-D vision,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 52, 1980, pp. 21-27. |
Simon, D.A., Accuracy Validation in Image-Guided Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Annual Intl. Symp. on Med. Rob. an Comp-Assisted surgery, MRCAS (1995), pp. 185-192. |
Smith et al., “Computer Methods for Improved Diagnostic Image Display Applied to Stereotactic Neurosurgery,” Automedical, vol. 14, 1992, pp. 371-382 (4 unnumbered pages). |
Smith, K.R., et al. Multimodality Image Analysis and Display Methods for Improved Tumor Localization in Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Annul Intl. Conf. of the IEEE Eng. in Med. and Biol. Soc., vol. 13, No. 1, p. 210 (1991). |
Smith, K.R., et al., The Neurostation-a highly, accurate, minimally invasive solution to frameless stereotatic neurosurgery, Comput. Med. Imag. and Graph., vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 247256 (1994). |
Stereotactic One, Affordable PC Based Graphics for Stereotactic Surgery, Stereotactic Image Systems, Inc. (SLC, Utah) (marketing brochure, undated). |
Tan, K., Ph.D., et al., A frameless stereotactic approach to neurosurgical planning based on retrospective patient-image registration, J Neurosurgy, vol. 79, pp. 296-303 (Aug. 1993). |
The Laitinen Stereoadapter 500, Instructions for use. By Surgical Navigation Technologies, FDA-NS-001A Rev. 0 (undated). |
The Laitinen Stereotactic System, E2-E6. |
Thompson, et al., A System for Anatomical and Functional Mapping of the Human Thalamus, Computers and Biomedical Research, vol. 10, pp. 9-24 (1977). |
Trobraugh, J.W., et al., Frameless Stereotactic Ultrasonography: Method and Applications, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 235-246 (1994). |
Viant et al., “A Computer Assisted Orthopaedic System for Distal Locking of Intramedullary Nails,” Proc. of MediMEC '95, Bristol, 1995, pp. 86-91. |
Von Hanwhr et al., Foreword, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 225-228, (Jul.-Aug. 1994). |
Wang, M.Y., et al., An Automatic Technique for Finding and Localizing Externally Attached Markers in CT and MR Volumn Images of the Head, IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 627-637 (Jun. 1996). |
Watanabe et al., “Three-Dimensional Digitizer (Neuronavigator): New Equipment for Computed Tomography-Guided Stereotaxic Surgery,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 27, No. 6, Jun. 1987, pp. 543-547. |
Watanabe, “Neuronavigator,” Igaku-no-Ayumi, vol. 137, No. 6, May 10, 1986, pp. 1-4. |
Watanabe, E., M.D., et al., Open Surgery Assisted by the Neuronavigator, a Stereotactic, Articulated, Sensitive Arm, Neurosurgery, vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 792-800 (1991). |
Weese et al., “An Approach to 2D/3D Registration of a Vertebra in 2D X-ray Fluoroscopies with 3D CT Images,” (1997) pp. 119-128. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100137707 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10103685 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 12697841 | US | |
Parent | 09429569 | Oct 1999 | US |
Child | 10103685 | US |