Patent Grant
10751533
A portion of the material in this patent document is subject to copyright protection under the copyright laws of the United States and of other countries. The owner of the copyright rights has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the United States Patent and Trademark Office publicly available file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever. The copyright owner does not hereby waive any of its rights to have this patent document maintained in secrecy, including without limitation its rights pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.14.
The main functions of the lower urinary tract that are compromised after a spinal cord injury (SCI) are the ability to store and to expel urine in a coordinated, controlled manner (de Groat et al. (1998) Behav. Brain Res. 92: 127-140; Shefchyk (2002) Progr. Brain Res. 137: 71-82). In the normal adult rat, storage of urine is dependent on the inhibition of parasympathetic action on the smooth bladder muscle (detrusor) and on the sympathetic tonic activation of the internal urethral sphincter for outflow resistance. During micturition, efficient voiding is dependent on synchronous activation of the detrusor muscle for contraction, relaxation of the internal urethral sphincter, and bursting activity of the striated external urethral sphincter (EUS) for enhanced urine flow (Maggi et al. (1986) J. Pharmacol. Meth., 15: 157-167; Kruse et al. (1993) Am J. Physiol.-Regul. Integrative and Comp. Physiol., 264: 1157-1163). In humans conscious control of the initiation of these largely autonomic functions involves a complex interaction between the cerebral cortex, pontine micturition center, sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems, and somatic motoneurons in the lumbar spinal cord. This interaction simultaneously activates stereotypical postural adjustments that are specie as well as gender unique.
Over the past several decades, multiple techniques have been used to induce micturition after SCI, including stimulation of the bladder wall, the pelvic nerve, and/or the sacral nerve. Directly stimulating the bladder wall induces local contractions, but high currents or a large number of electrodes are needed to induce a more widespread contraction to achieve sufficient bladder emptying. Pelvic nerve stimulation has been shown to contract the bladder wall, but as the pelvic nerve does not innervate the EUS minimal effect was seen on the EUS resulting in a low voiding efficiency (Holmquist and Tord (1968) Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 2: 129-135). Voiding was only achieved, however, by cutting the pudental nerve. This largely irreversible procedure eliminates sensation from the external genitalia of both sexes and the skin around the anus and perineum, as well as the motor supply to various pelvic muscles, including the external urethral sphincter and the external anal sphincter. Sacral nerve stimulation seemed to offer the best results, but requires complicated surgical procedures and a serious risk of permanent damage via the intradural approach (Rijkhoff et al. (1997) J. Urol., 157: 1504-1508).
In various embodiments methods and devices are provided to provide improved regulation/control of bladder voiding in a subject with impaired bladder control. In certain embodiments the subject is a subject with a spinal cord or brain injury, or a neurological injury or illness. It was discovered that electrical stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord can improve initiation of micturition and/or improve the consistency and/or amount of bladder emptying.
Various embodiments contemplated herein may include, but need not be limited to, one or more of the following:
A method of improving bladder function in a subject with impaired bladder control, said method including applying a pattern of electrical stimulation to the lumbosacral spinal cord at a frequency and intensity sufficient to initiate micturition and/or to improve the amount of bladder emptying.
The method of embodiment 1, wherein said subject has a spinal cord or brain injury or a neurological injury or illness.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-2, wherein said electrical stimulation is at a frequency and intensity sufficient to initiate micturition.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-3, wherein said electrical stimulation is at a frequency and intensity sufficient to improve the amount of bladder emptying (e.g., to provide at least 30% emptying or at least 40% emptying, or at least 50% emptying, or at least 60% emptying, or at least 70% emptying, or at least 80% emptying, or at least 90% emptying, or at least 95% emptying).
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-4, wherein bladder emptying is initiated within 10 seconds, or within 5 seconds, or within 3 seconds, or within 2 seconds, or within 1 second of initiation of electrical stimulation.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-5, wherein said electrical stimulation is over a region of the spinal cord including or consisting of the region from L1 to S5 or from L1 to S3, or from L1 to S1, or from L2 to S1.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-5, wherein said electrical stimulation is over a region of the spinal cord including or consisting of the region from L2 to S1.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-7, wherein said electrical stimulation ranges from about 1 Hz up to about 100 Hz, or from about 1 Hz up to about 50 Hz, or from about 1 Hz up to about 40 Hz, or is about 1 Hz.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-7, wherein said electrical stimulation ranges from about 1 Hz up to about 40 Hz, or is about 1 Hz.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-9, wherein said electrical stimulation includes tonic stimulation.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-10, wherein said electrical stimulation includes bipolar stimulation.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-11, wherein said electrical stimulation includes epidural electrical stimulation.
The method of embodiment 12, wherein said epidural electrical stimulation is at an amplitude ranging from about 0.01 mA or about 0.05 mA to about 50 mA or to about 30 mA, or from about 0.1 mA to about 20 mA, or from about 0.1 mA to about 15 mA or to about 10 mA.
The method according to any one of embodiments 12-13, wherein said epidural stimulation comprise pulses having a pulse width ranging from about 1 μs to about 1 ms, or from about 1 μs or from about 10 μS, or from about 100 μs to about 1 ms, or from about 150 μs to about 600 μs, or from about 200 μs to about 500 μs, or from about 200 μs to about 450 μs.
The method according to any one of embodiments 12-14, wherein said epidural stimulation is applied via a permanently implanted electrode array.
The method of embodiment 15, wherein said electrode array is a polymer based microelectrode implant.
The method of embodiment 15, wherein said electrode array is a parylene or polyimide based microelectrode implant.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-11, wherein said electrical stimulation includes transcutaneous electrical stimulation.
The method of embodiment 18, wherein said transcutaneous stimulation is at an amplitude ranging from 10 mA up to about 300 mA, or up to about 150 mA, or up to about 100 mA, or from about 20 mA to about 300 mA, or up to about 150 mA or up to about 100 mA, or from about 20 mA or from about 30 mA, or from about 40 mA up to about 50 mA, or up to about 60 mA, or up to about 70 mA or up to about 80 mA, or up to about 100 mA, or up to about 150 mA, or up to about 200 mA, or up to about 250 mA, or up to about 300 mA.
The method according to any one of embodiments 18-19, wherein said transcutaneous stimulation pulse width ranges from about 10 μs, or from about 50 μs, or from about 100 μs, or from about 250 μs, up to about 1000 μs, or up to about 500 μs, or up to about 250 μs, or up to about 200 μs.
The method according to any one of embodiments 18-20, wherein said transcutaneous stimulation is superimposed on a high frequency carrier signal.
The method of embodiment 21, wherein said high frequency carrier signal ranges from 3 kHz, or about 5 kHz, or about 8 kHz up to about 80 kHz, or up to about 50 kHz, or up to about 40 kHz, or up to about 30 kHz, or up to about 20 kHz, or up to about 15 kHz.
The method of embodiment 21, wherein said high frequency carrier signal is about 10 kHz.
The method according to any one of embodiments 21-23, wherein said carrier frequency amplitude ranges from about 30 mA, or about 40 mA, or about 50 mA, or about 60 mA, or about 70 mA, or about 80 mA up to about 500 mA, or up to about 300 mA, or up to about 200 mA, or up to about 150 mA.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-24, wherein said method does not comprise direct stimulation of the pelvic nerve.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-25, wherein said method does not comprise transection of the pudendal nerve.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-26, wherein said method does not comprise direct stimulation of the sacral nerve.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-27, wherein said method does not comprise direct stimulation of the anterior sacral nerve.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-28, wherein said method includes treating said subject applying a pattern of electrical stimulation in repeated electrical stimulation training sessions.
The method of embodiment 29, wherein said repeated electrical stimulation training sessions are repeated over a period of at least one day, or over a period of at least 2 days, or over a period of at least 3 days, or over a period of at least 1 week, or over a period of at least 2 weeks, or over a period of at least 3 weeks, or over a period of at least 4 weeks, or over a period of at least 5 weeks, or over a period of at least 6 weeks.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-30, wherein the subject is a human.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-31, wherein the electrical stimulation is under control of the subject.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-32, wherein said method further includes physical training of said subject.
The method of embodiment 33, wherein said physical training includes movement of a region of the torso and/or legs of the subject.
The method of embodiment 34, wherein said movement includes a change in postural position.
The method of embodiment 34, wherein said movement includes a locomotor activity associated with standing and/or stepping and/or sitting.
The method according to any one of embodiments 33-36, wherein said training includes training against a resistance.
The method according to any one of embodiments 33-37, wherein said training is robotically facilitated.
The method according to any one of embodiments 33-38, wherein said training utilizes a treadmill and/or an exoskeleton, and/or a prosthesis.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-39, wherein said method further includes administration of a drug selected from the group consisting of a serotonergic drug, a dopaminergic drug, a noradrenergic drug, a GABAergic drug, and a glycinergic drug.
The method of embodiment 40, wherein said drug is selected from the group consisting of 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), 4-(benzodioxan-5-yl)1-(indan-2-yl)piperazine (S15535), N-{2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl}-N-(2-pyridinyl)cyclo-hexanecarboxamide (WAY 100.635), quipazine, strychnine, ketanserin, 4-amino-(6-chloro-2-pyridyl)-1 piperidine hydrochloride (SR 57227A), Ondanesetron, buspirone, methoxamine, prazosin, clonidine, yohimbine, 6-chloro-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol (SKF-81297), 7-chloro-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-3-benzazepin-8-ol (SCH-23390), quinpirole, and eticlopride.
The method of embodiment 41, wherein said drug includes buspirone.
The method of embodiment 41, wherein said drug includes quipazine and/or strychnine.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-43, wherein said subject has a spinal cord injury.
The method of embodiment 44, wherein said spinal cord injury is a thoracic or cervical spinal cord injury.
The method according to any one of embodiments 44-45, wherein said spinal cord injury is clinically classified as motor complete.
The method according to any one of embodiments 44-45, wherein said spinal cord injury is clinically classified as motor incomplete.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-43, wherein said subject has an ischemic brain injury.
The method of embodiment 48, wherein said ischemic brain injury is brain injury from stroke or acute trauma.
The method according to any one of embodiments 1-43, wherein said subject has a neurodegenerative pathology.
The method of embodiment 50, wherein said neurodegenerative pathology is associated with a condition selected from the group consisting of Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), and cerebral palsy.
A method training a subject having a spinal cord and/or brain injury, to improve initiation of micturition and/or to improve the amount of bladder emptying, said method including: administering to said subject repeated electrical stimulation training sessions according to any one of embodiments 1-28.
The method of embodiment 52, where said training sessions are administered until the response of said subject to electrical stimulation provides improved initiation of micturition (e.g., improved consistency) and/or increased voiding of the bladder.
The method according to any one of embodiments 52-53, wherein said repeated electrical stimulation training sessions are repeated over a period of at least one day, or over a period of at least 2 days, or over a period of at least 3 days, or over a period of at least 1 week, or over a period of at least 2 weeks, or over a period of at least 3 weeks, or over a period of at least 4 weeks, or over a period of at least 5 weeks, or over a period of at least 6 weeks.
The method according to any one of embodiments 52-54, wherein the subject is a human.
The method according to any one of embodiments 52-55, wherein the electrical stimulation is under control of the subject.
The method according to any one of embodiments 52-56, wherein said method further includes physical training of said subject.
The method of embodiment 57, wherein said physical training includes movement of a region of the torso and/or legs of the subject.
The method of embodiment 58, wherein said movement includes a change in postural position.
The method of embodiment 58, wherein said movement includes a locomotor activity associated with standing and/or stepping and/or sitting.
The method according to any one of embodiments 57-60, wherein said training includes training against a resistance.
The method according to any one of embodiments 57-61, wherein said training is robotically facilitated.
The method according to any one of embodiments 57-62, wherein said training utilizes a treadmill and/or an exoskeleton, and/or a prosthesis.
The method according to any one of embodiments 52-63, wherein said method further includes administration of a drug selected from the group consisting of a serotonergic drug, a dopaminergic drug, a noradrenergic drug, a GABAergic drug, and a glycinergic drug.
The method of embodiment 64, wherein said drug is selected from the group consisting of 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), 4-(benzodioxan-5-yl)1-(indan-2-yl)piperazine (S15535), N-{2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl}-N-(2-pyridinyl)cyclo-hexanecarboxamide (WAY 100.635), quipazine, strychnine, ketanserin, 4-amino-(6-chloro-2-pyridyl)-1 piperidine hydrochloride (SR 57227A), Ondanesetron, buspirone, methoxamine, prazosin, clonidine, yohimbine, 6-chloro-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol (SKF-81297), 7-chloro-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-3-benzazepin-8-ol (SCH-23390), quinpirole, and eticlopride.
The method of embodiment 65, wherein said drug includes buspirone.
The method of embodiment 65, wherein said drug includes quipazine and/or strychnine.
The method according to any one of embodiments 52-67, wherein said subject has a spinal cord injury.
The method of embodiment 68, wherein said spinal cord injury is a thoracic or cervical spinal cord injury.
The method according to any one of embodiments 68-69, wherein said spinal cord injury is clinically classified as motor complete.
The method according to any one of embodiments 68-69, wherein said spinal cord injury is clinically classified as motor incomplete.
The method according to any one of embodiments 52-67, wherein said subject has an ischemic brain injury.
The method of embodiment 72, wherein said ischemic brain injury is brain injury from stroke or acute trauma.
The method according to any one of embodiments 52-67, wherein said subject has a neurodegenerative pathology.
The method of embodiment 74, wherein said neurodegenerative pathology is associated with a condition selected from the group consisting of Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), and cerebral palsy.
A system for controlling and/or improving bladder function in a mammal, said system including a transcutaneous electrode and/or an epidural electrode electrically coupled to an electrical stimulator configured to deliver transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord through a transcutaneous electrode and/or epidural electrical stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord through an epidural electrode according to the method of any one of embodiments 1-27.
The system of embodiment 76, wherein said system includes an electrical stimulator coupled to an epidural electrode configured to deliver epidural stimulation according to the method of any one of embodiments 1-14.
The system of embodiment 77, wherein said epidural electrode includes a permanently implanted electrode array.
The system of embodiment 78, wherein said electrode array is a polymer based microelectrode implant.
The system of embodiment 78, wherein said electrode array is a parylene or polyimide based microelectrode implant.
The system of embodiment 76, wherein said system includes an electrical stimulator coupled to a transcutaneous electrode configured to deliver transcutaneous stimulation according to the method of any one of embodiments 1-11 and 18-24.
The system according to any one of embodiments 76-81, wherein said system further comprise a sensor to detect bladder fullness.
The system of embodiment 82, wherein said sensor is configured to indicate state of bladder fullness to said subject.
The system according to any one of embodiments 82-83, wherein said sensor is coupled to a controller to operate said electrical stimulator to void the bladder at a specified fullness and/or at a specified time and/or in response to a user input.
The system according of embodiment 84, wherein said controller is integrated into said stimulator.
The system according of embodiment 84, wherein said controller is independent of said stimulator.
The system according to any one of embodiments 82-87, wherein said sensor includes a nerve-electrode interface that combines features sieve and cuff designs by confining axons microchannels.
The system according to any one of embodiments 76-87, wherein said system that includes a training device configured to assist with physically training of the subject.
The system of embodiment 88, wherein said training device includes one or more devices selected from the group consisting of a treadmill, a walker, an exoskeleton, a weight machine, an exoskeleton, and an robotic training device.
The system according to any one of embodiments 76-89, wherein said system is configured to record, receive and/or transmit data wirelessly.
A method for restoring bladder function in a patient after a spinal cord injury causing paralysis, the method including applying a pattern of electrical stimulation to the spinal cord.
The method of embodiment 91, wherein bladder emptying is initiated within seconds of initiation of electrical stimulation.
The method of embodiment 91, further including treating the patient with repeated stimulation-training sessions.
A method for restoring bladder function in a patient after a spinal cord injury causing paralysis, the method including enabling locomotor-related spinal neuronal circuits by epidural stimulation.
The method of embodiment 94, wherein bladder emptying is initiated within seconds of initiation of epidural stimulation.
The method of embodiment 94, further including treating the patient with repeated stimulation-training sessions.
A method for restoring bladder function in a patient after a spinal cord injury causing paralysis, the method including: placing electrodes epidurally on the dorsum of the spinal cord;
energizing the electrodes with a frequency-dependent stimulation pattern that is therapeutically effective.
The method of embodiment 97, further including treating the patient with repeated stimulation-training sessions.
The terms “patient”, “subject”, or “mammalian subject” are used interchangeably herein and include any mammal in need of the treatment methods described herein (e.g., methods of bladder control in subjects having a brain and/or spinal cord injury). Such mammals include, particularly humans (e.g., human infants, human teens, human adults, etc.). Other mammals in need of such treatment can include non-human mammals such as dogs, cats, or other domesticated animals, horses, livestock, laboratory animals (e.g., lagomorphs, non-human primates, etc.), and the like. The subject may be male or female.
As used herein “electrical stimulation” or “stimulation” means application of an electrical signal that may be either excitatory or inhibitory to a muscle, nerve, nerve tract, nerve branch, nerve root or neuron and/or to groups of neurons and/or interneurons. It will be understood that an electrical signal may be applied to one or more electrodes with one or more return electrodes.
As used herein “epidural” means situated upon the dura or in very close proximity to the dura. The term “epidural stimulation” refers to electrical epidural stimulation. In certain embodiments epidural stimulation is referred to as “electrical enabling motor control” (eEmc).
The term “transcutaneous stimulation” or “transcutaneous electrical stimulation” or “cutaneous electrical stimulation” refers to electrical stimulation applied to the skin, and, as typically used herein refers to electrical stimulation applied to the skin in order to effect stimulation of the spinal cord or a region thereof. The term “transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation” may also be referred to as “tSCS”. The term “pcEmc” refers to painless cutaneous electrical stimulation.
The term “motor complete” when used with respect to a spinal cord injury indicates that there is no motor function below the lesion, (e.g., no movement can be voluntarily induced in muscles innervated by spinal segments below the spinal lesion.
The term “monopolar stimulation” refers to stimulation between a local electrode and a common distant return electrode.
The term “co-administering”, “concurrent administration”, “administering in conjunction with” or “administering in combination” when used, for example with respect to transcutaneous electrical stimulation, epidural electrical stimulation, and pharmaceutical administration, refers to administration of the transcutaneous electrical stimulation and/or epidural electrical stimulation and/or pharmaceutical such that various modalities can simultaneously achieve a physiological effect on the subject. The administered modalities need not be administered together, either temporally or at the same site. In some embodiments, the various “treatment” modalities are administered at different times. In some embodiments, administration of one can precede administration of the other (e.g., drug before electrical and/or magnetic stimulation or vice versa). Simultaneous physiological effect need not necessarily require presence of drug and the electrical and/or magnetic stimulation at the same time or the presence of both stimulation modalities at the same time. In some embodiments, all the modalities are administered essentially simultaneously.
The phrase “spinal cord stimulation” as used herein includes stimulation of any spinal nervous tissue, including spinal neurons, accessory neuronal cells, nerves, nerve roots, nerve fibers, or tissues, that are associated with the spinal cord. It is contemplated that spinal cord stimulation may comprise stimulation of one or more areas associated with a lumbosacral vertebral segment.
As used herein, “spinal nervous tissue” refers to nerves, neurons, neuroglial cells, glial cells, neuronal accessory cells, nerve roots, nerve fibers, nerve rootlets, parts of nerves, nerve bundles, mixed nerves, sensory fibers, motor fibers, dorsal root, ventral root, dorsal root ganglion, spinal ganglion, ventral motor root, general somatic afferent fibers, general visceral afferent fibers, general somatic efferent fibers, general visceral efferent fibers, grey matter, white matter, the dorsal column, the lateral column(s), and/or the ventral column associated with the spinal cord. Spinal nervous tissue includes “spinal nerve roots,” that comprise any one or more of the 31 pairs of nerves that emerge from the spinal cord.
In various embodiments methods, devices and systems are provided to facilitate bladder control in a subject (e.g., a human or a non-human mammal) that has a spinal cord or brain injury. In various embodiments training methods are provided that improve the response of a subject to the methods, devices and systems that facilitate bladder control.
It is demonstrated that long-term synergistic effects of epidural stimulation have beneficial effects on bladder function. Additionally, specific spinal cord stimulation parameters are identified that initiate bladder emptying within seconds of the initiation of, e.g., epidural electrical stimulation.
Given the locations of the neural networks within the spinal cord that control autonomic function, the level and extent of a spinal cord lesion are important factors in the extent of loss of bladder function (Potter (2006) Progr. Brain Res. 152: 51-57). A complete mid-thoracic spinal cord transection in rats results in the loss of bladder function initially with some autonomically initiated spontaneous control returning in the following weeks, allowing for occasional but incomplete emptying. In humans with a thoracic or cervical SCI, descending projections from supraspinal centers often are severed and their axons degenerated. In many such individuals, the reflex pathways mediating continence remain intact, but micturition cannot be initiated in a normal manner (Barrington (1941) Brain, 64: 239-243). The most common form of this condition is detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia (de Groat et al. (1990) J. Autonom. Nervous Syst. 30: 71-77; de Groat and Yoshimura (2010) Neuro. & Urodynam. 29: 63-76) in which both the detrusor and EUS tend to be activated together rather than reciprocally.
As demonstrated herein, it appears that epidural stimulation raises the net excitability level of spinal neural networks (interneurons and motoneurons) and, particularly when combined with motor training and/or pharmacological interventions, enhances the activation of the sensorimotor pathways that also control bladder function. Data presented herein demonstrate that in addition to the chronic effects, e.g., improved spontaneous bladder emptying associated with epidural stimulation and, for example step training, a unique spinal epidural stimulation paradigm is described that can overcome detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia and induce bladder emptying on demand in subjects with a complete mid-thoracic spinal cord transection.
It is noted that within three days of the initiation of epidural stimulation and step training the rats started voiding spontaneously during cage activity and step training. After 3 weeks of locomotor training facilitated with eEmc (40 Hz between L2 and S1) and quipazine and strychnine administration, the spinal rats consistently voided when stimulated at 1 Hz between L2 and S1. Without being bound to a particular theory, it is believed that locomotor training (Courtine et al. (2009) Nature Neurosci. 12: 1333-1342; Ichiyama et al. (2008) J Neurosci. 28: 7370-7375) with eEmc chronically engaged the neural networks by lowering the threshold of excitability and apparently when stimulated at 1 Hz the networks were tuned to initiate micturition.
An underlying mechanism of the improved spontaneous control of bladder emptying is suggested by the heightened responses to the afferent-information sensing bladder volume. This enhanced spontaneous voiding of the bladder was more efficient in the trained compared to untrained animals most likely reflecting the lowered activation threshold due to the chronic engagement of the neural networks in the trained rats.
In certain embodiments the complex functioning of bladder voiding was achieved via an eEmc tonic drive at 1 Hz between L2 and S1, although as demonstrated herein other stimulation patterns also facilitate micturation. The conceptual basis of selecting a given eEmc parameter was to activate the neural networks that initiate the automaticity of the coordinated contractions and relaxations of the bladder and EUS that result in bladder voiding. During stimulation at 1 Hz, the bladder contracts tonically. This response occurs in the EUS within a 20 to 100 ms time window. Without being bound to a particular theory, it is believed that these evoked potentials with a long latency may represent the activation of complex interneuronal networks that enable bursting activity of the EUS similar to that observed during voiding in intact rats.
In the methods described herein, by preserving the sensorimotor networks that underlie the automaticity of micturition, as occurs with the recovery of stepping and standing after a complete spinal cord transection, bladder function can be largely re-established by enabling the inherent automaticity present within the spinal cord. As demonstrated herein, the spinal cord circuitry contains the necessary circuitry to control bladder voiding when provided the appropriate afferent information from the bladder and the sphincter. Based on frequency-specific stimulation parameters, the spinal cord can be tuned to enable the appropriate physiological response.
The clinical implications of this technique are immense and parallel the impact that spinal cord stimulation has had on locomotion studies and the recovery of volitional movement after complete paralysis (Harkema et al. (2011) Lancet, 377: 1938-1947; Angeli et al. (2014) Brain, 137: 1394-1409). The application of spinal cord stimulation to overcome difficulty in micturition is not likely limited to SCI but could be adapted to other neurological and/or physiological disorders. This protocol could be invaluable in avoiding unnecessary transurethral catheterization, potentially lowering the incidence of urinary tract infections and reversing the uptake of urine into the kidney.
In summary, the main findings include, but are not limited to 1) the demonstration of functional links between the neural control (biomechanical and electrophysiological) of locomotion and micturition in awake unanesthetized rats, 2) the immediate effect of in vivo spinal cord stimulation on micturition, and 3) the positive chronic effects of step training under the influence of eEmc and pharmacological interventions on bladder function.
Accordingly, in various embodiments, methods of providing/improving bladder function in a subject after a spinal cord and/or brain injury are provided where the methods comprise applying a pattern of electrical stimulation to the lumbosacral spinal cord at a frequency and intensity sufficient to facilitate micturation. Such facilitation may include inter alia, improvement in initiation of micturition and/or improvement in the volume of the bladder that is voided. Thus, in certain embodiments, the method provided herein provide at least 30% emptying or at least 40% emptying, or at least 50% emptying, or at least 60% emptying, or at least 70% emptying, or at least 80% emptying, or at least 90% emptying, or at least 95% emptying, or at least 98% emptying of the bladder, e.g., upon application of electrical stimulation as described herein. In certain embodiments the stimulation comprises epidural electrical stimulation, while in other embodiments the stimulation comprises transcutaneous electrical stimulation.
In certain embodiments the methods described herein can further involve physical training of the subject. In certain embodiments such training can include, inter alia, movement of a region of the torso and/or legs of the subject (and/or stabilization of a region of the torso and/or legs against a resistance).
In certain embodiments the methods can also further involve administration of a neuromodulatory drug (e.g., a serotonergic drug, a dopaminergic drug, a noradrenergic drug, a GABAergic drug, and/or a glycinergic drug). Illustrative drugs include, but are not limited to buspirone, quipazine and/or strychnine.
It was also a surprising discovery that a training regime comprising repeated bouts of electrical stimulation (e.g., as described herein) can produce improvements in micturition. Thus for example, consistency of micturition initiation, e.g., in response to electrical stimulation, and/or improvements in voiding volume can be improved by such repeated electrical stimulation training bouts optionally in combination with physical training and/or administration of drugs as described herein.
In certain embodiments systems are provided for, inter alia, controlling bladder function. In illustrative, but non-limiting embodiments, the systems comprise a transcutaneous electrode and/or an epidural electrode electrically coupled to an electrical stimulator configured to deliver transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord through a transcutaneous electrode and/or epidural electrical stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord through an epidural electrode according to the method described herein. In certain embodiments the system comprise a sensor to detect bladder fullness.
In various embodiments the methods described herein are advantageous in that they do not require transection of the pudendal nerve and thereby avoid the adverse consequences of such transection. In various embodiments the methods described herein, surprisingly, do not require direct stimulation of the pelvic nerve and/or the sacral nerve.
Epidural Stimulation of a Region of the Lumbosacral Spine
In various embodiments, the methods described herein involve epidural electrical stimulation of the lumbosacral spine or a region of the lumbosacral spine of the subject. Illustrative regions include, but are not limited to one or more regions straddling or spanning a region selected from the group consisting of L1-L1, L1-L2, L1-L3, L1-L4, L1-L5, L1-S1, L1-S2, L1-S3, L1-S4, L1-55, L2-L2, L2-L3, L2-L4, L2-L5, L2-S1, L2-S2, L2-S3, L2-S4, L2-S5, L3-L3, L3-L4, L3-L5, L3-S1, L3-S2, L3-S3, L3-S4, L3-S5, L4-L4, L4-L5, L4-S1, L4-S2, L4-S3, L4-S4, L4-S5, L5-L5, L5-S1, L5-S2, L5-S3, L5-S4, L5-55, S1-S1, S1-S2, S1-S3, S1-S4, S1-S5, S2-S2, S2-S3, S2-S4, S2-S5, S3-S3, S3-S4, S3-S5, S4-S4, S4-S5, and S5-S6.
In certain embodiments the epidural stimulation is at a frequency ranging from about 0.5 Hz or from about 1 Hz up to about 100 Hz, or from about 1 Hz up to about 50 Hz, or from about 1 Hz up to about 40 Hz, or from about 1 Hz, or from about 5 Hz, or from about 10 Hz up to about 100 Hz, or up to about 80 Hz, or up to about 50 Hz, or up to about 40 Hz.
In certain embodiments the epidural stimulation is at an amplitude ranging from 0.05 mA up to about 30 mA, or from about 0.1 mA up to about 20 mA, or from about 0.1 mA up to about 15 mA or up to about 10 mA.
In certain embodiments the pulse width ranges from about 1 μs, or from about 10 μs, or from about 100 μs, or from about 150 μs up to about 600 μs, or up to about 500 μs, or up to about 250 μs, or up to about 150 μs, or up to about 100 μs, or from about 1 μs to about 1 ms, or from about 1 μs or from about 10 μS, or from about 100 μs to about 1 ms, or from about 150 μs to about 600 μs, or from about 200 μs to about 500 μs, or from about 200 μs to about 450 μs. In certain embodiments the pulse width ranges from about 100 μs up to about 1000 μs.
In certain embodiments the epidural stimulation is at a frequency and amplitude sufficient to initiate bladder emptying and/or to improve the degree of bladder emptying. In certain embodiments the epidural stimulation is at a frequency and amplitude sufficient to provide at least 30% emptying or at least 40% emptying, or at least 50% emptying, or at least 60% emptying, or at least 70% emptying, or at least 80% emptying, or at least 90% emptying, or at least 95% emptying, or at least about 98% emptying of the bladder.
In certain embodiments the epidural stimulation is applied paraspinally over a lumbosacral identified above (e.g., over vertebrae spanning L2 to S1, etc.).
In certain embodiments the epidural stimulation is applied via a permanently implanted electrode array (e.g., a typical density electrode array, a high density electrode array, etc.).
In certain embodiments the epidural electrical stimulation is administered via a high density epidural stimulating array (e.g., as described in PCT Publication No: WO/2012/094346 (PCT/US2012/020112). In certain embodiments, the high density electrode arrays are prepared using microfabrication technology to place numerous electrodes in an array configuration on a flexible substrate. One suitable epidural array fabrication method was first developed for retinal stimulating arrays (see, e.g., Maynard (2001) Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 3: 145-168; Weiland and Humayun (2005) IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., 24(5): 14-21, and U.S. Patent Publications 2006/0003090 and 2007/0142878). In various embodiments the stimulating arrays comprise one or more biocompatible metals (e.g., gold, platinum, chromium, titanium, iridium, tungsten, and/or oxides and/or alloys thereof) disposed on a flexible material (e.g., parylene A, parylene C, parylene AM, parylene F, parylene N, parylene D, or other flexible substrate materials). Parylene has the lowest water permeability of available microfabrication polymers, is deposited in a uniquely conformal and uniform manner, has previously been classified by the FDA as a United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Class VI biocompatible material (enabling its use in chronic implants) (Wolgemuth, Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry, 22(8): 42-49 (2000)), and has flexibility characteristics (Young's modulus ˜4 GPa (Rodger and Tai (2005) IEEE Eng. Med. Biology, 24(5): 52-57)), lying in between those of PDMS (often considered too flexible) and most polyimides (often considered too stiff). Finally, the tear resistance and elongation at break of parylene are both large, minimizing damage to electrode arrays under surgical manipulation (Rodger et al. (2006) Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical, 1 17(1): 107-114). Microelectrode arrays and the preparation such microelectrode arrays suitable for use in the epidural stimulation methods described herein is described in PCT Publication No: WO/2012/100260 (PCT/US2012/022257).
The electrode array may be implanted using any of a number of methods (e.g., a laminectomy procedure) well known to those of skill in the art.
In various embodiments, the arrays are operably linked to control circuitry that permits selection of electrode(s) to activate/stimulate and/or that controls frequency, and/or pulse width, and/or amplitude of stimulation. In various embodiments, the electrode selection, frequency, amplitude, and pulse width are independently selectable, e.g., at different times, different electrodes can be selected. At any time, different electrodes can provide different stimulation frequencies and/or amplitudes. In various embodiments, different electrodes or all electrodes can be operated in a monopolar mode and/or a bipolar mode, using constant current or constant voltage delivery of the stimulation.
In certain embodiments, the electrodes can also be provided with implantable control circuitry and/or an implantable power source. In various embodiments, the implantable control circuitry can be programmed/reprogrammed by use of an external device (e.g., using a handheld device that communicates with the control circuitry through the skin). The programming can be repeated as often as necessary.
Any present or future developed stimulation system capable of providing an electrical signal to one or more regions of the lumbosacral spinal cord may be used in accordance with the teachings provided herein. In various embodiments, the system may comprise an external pulse generator. In other embodiments the system may comprise an implantable pulse generator to produce a number of stimulation pulses that are sent to the a region in proximity to the lumbosacral spinal cord (e.g., L2-S1) by insulated leads coupled to the spinal cord by one or more electrodes and/or an electrode array. In certain embodiments the one or more electrodes or one or more electrodes comprising the electrode array may be attached to separate conductors included within a single lead. Any known or future developed lead useful for applying an electrical stimulation signal in proximity to a subject's spinal cord may be used. For example, the leads may be conventional percutaneous leads, such as PISCES® model 3487A sold by Medtronic, Inc. In certain circumstances it may be desirable to employ a paddle-type lead.
Any known or future developed external or implantable pulse generator may be used in accordance with the teachings provided herein. For example one internal pulse generator may be an ITREL® II or Synergy pulse generator available from Medtronic, Inc, Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc.'s GENESIS® pulse generator, or Advanced Bionics Corporation's PRECISION® pulse generator. One of skill in the art will recognize that the above-mentioned pulse generators may be advantageously modified to deliver therapy in accordance with the teachings provided herein.
In certain embodiments the system can employ a programmer coupled via a conductor to a radio frequency antenna. This system permits attending medical personnel to select the various pulse output options after implant using radio frequency communications. While, in certain embodiments, the system employs fully implanted elements, systems employing partially implanted elements may also be used in accordance with the teachings provided herein.
In one illustrative but non-limiting system a control module is operably coupled to a signal generation module and instructs the signal generation module regarding the signal to be generated. For example, at any given time or period of time, the control module may instruct the signal generation module to generate an electrical signal having a specified pulse width, frequency, intensity (current or voltage), etc. The control module may be preprogrammed prior to implantation or receive instructions from a programmer (or another source) through any known or future developed mechanism, such as telemetry. The control module may include or be operably coupled to memory to store instructions for controlling the signal generation module and may contain a processor for controlling which instructions to send to signal generation module and the timing of the instructions to be sent to signal generation module. In various embodiments leads are operably coupled to a signal generation module such that a stimulation pulse generated by a signal generation module may be delivered via electrodes.
While in certain embodiments, two leads are utilized, it will be understood that any number of one or more leads may be employed. In addition, it will be understood that any number of one or more electrodes per lead may be employed. Stimulation pulses are applied to electrodes (which typically are cathodes) with respect to a return electrode (which typically is an anode) to induce a desired area of excitation of electrically excitable tissue in a region of the lumbosacral spine (e.g., L2-S1). A return electrode such as a ground or other reference electrode can be located on the same lead as a stimulation electrode. However, it will be understood that a return electrode may be located at nearly any location, whether in proximity to the stimulation electrode or at a more remote part of the body, such as at a metallic case of a pulse generator. It will be further understood that any number of one or more return electrodes may be employed. For example, there can be a respective return electrode for each cathode such that a distinct cathode/anode pair is formed for each cathode.
The epidural electrode stimulation systems described above are intended to be illustrative and non-limiting. Using the teachings provided herein alternative epidural stimulation systems and methods will be available to one of skill in the art.
Transcutaneous Stimulation of the Lumbosacral Spinal Cord.
In various embodiments, the methods described herein involve transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the lumbosacral spine or a region of the lumbosacral spine of the subject. Illustrative regions include, but are not limited to one or more regions straddling or spanning a region selected from the group consisting of L1-L1, L1-L2, L1-L3, L1-L4, L1-L5, L1-S1, L1-S2, L1-S3, L1-S4, L1-S5, L2-L2, L2-L3, L2-L4, L2-L5, L2-S1, L2-S2, L2-S3, L2-S4, L2-S5, L3-L3, L3-L4, L3-L5, L3-S1, L3-S2, L3-S3, L3-S4, L3-S5, L4-L4, L4-L5, L4-S1, L4-S2, L4-S3, L4-S4, L4-S5, L5-L5, L5-S1, L5-S2, L5-S3, L5-S4, L5-55, S1-S1, S1-S2, S1-S3, S1-S4, S1-55, S2-S2, S2-S3, S2-S4, S2-S5, S3-S3, S3-S4, S3-S5, S4-S4, and S4-S5.
In certain embodiments, the transcutaneous al stimulation is at a frequency ranging from about 0.5 Hz or from about 1 Hz up to about 100 Hz, or from about 1 Hz up to about 50 Hz, or from about 1 Hz up to about 40 Hz, or from about 1 Hz, or from about 5 Hz, or from about 10 Hz up to about 100 Hz, or up to about 80 Hz, or up to about 50 Hz, or up to about 40 Hz.
In certain embodiments, the transcutaneous stimulation is applied at an intensity (amplitude) ranging from about 10 mA, or from about 20 mA, or from about 30 mA, up to about 300 mA, or up to about 150 mA, or up to about 100 mA, or from about 20 mA up to about 300 mA, or up to about 200 mA, or up to about 150 mA or up to about 100 mA, or from about 20 mA or from about 30 mA, or from about 40 mA up to about 50 mA, or up to about 60 mA, or up to about 70 mA or up to about 80 mA, or up to about 100 mA, or up to about 150 mA, or up to about 200 mA, or up to about 250 mA, or up to about 300 mA. In certain embodiments the intensity ranges from about 50 mA up to about 160 mA.
In certain embodiments, the pulse width ranges from about 10 μs, or from about 50 μs, or from about 100 μs, or from about 250 μs, up to about 500 ms, or up to about 100 ms, or up to about 10 ms, or up to about 1 ms, or up to about 500 μs, or up to about 250 μs, or up to about 200 μs. In certain embodiments the pulse width ranges from about 0.5 up to about 5 ms.
In certain embodiments the stimulation pulse is delivered superimposed on a high frequency carrier signal. In certain embodiments the high frequency ranges from about 3 kHz, or about 5 kHz, or about 8 kHz up to about 100 kHz, or up to about 80 kHz, or up to about 50 kHz, or up to about 40 kHz, or up to about 30 kHz, or up to about 20 kHz, or up to about 15 kHz or up to about 10 kHz. In certain embodiments the carrier frequency amplitude ranges from about 30 mA, or about 40 mA, or about 50 mA, or about 60 mA, or about 70 mA, or about 80 mA up to about 500 mA, or up to about 400 mA, or up to about 300 mA, or up to about 200 mA, or up to about 150 mA.
In one illustrative, but non-limiting embodiment, a bipolar rectangular stimuli (1-msec duration) with a carrier frequency of 10 kHz and at intensities ranging from 30 to 300 mA is used. The stimulation can be at 1 Hz, for example, with an illustrative, but non-limiting exposure duration ranging from 10 to 30 sec. An illustrative, but non-limiting signal intensity is from about 80 mA, or from about 100 mA, or from about 110 mA to about 200 mA, or to about 180 mA, or to about 150 mA.
In certain embodiments the transcutaneous stimulation is at a frequency and amplitude sufficient to initiate bladder emptying and/or to improve the degree of bladder emptying. In certain embodiments the transcutaneous stimulation is at a frequency and amplitude sufficient to provide at least 30% emptying or at least 40% emptying, or at least 50% emptying, or at least 60% emptying, or at least 70% emptying, or at least 80% emptying, or at least 90% emptying, or at least 95% emptying, or at least about 98% emptying of the bladder.
By way of illustration, it is believe non-invasive transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) applied to the lumbosacral spinal cord (e.g., over L2-S1) can induce bladder voiding when applied, e.g., at a frequency ranging from about 1 Hz up to about 40 Hz.
The transcutaneous electrode or electrode array can applied to the surface of a body using any of a number of methods well known to those of skill in the art.
In some embodiments, the subject is provided a generator control unit and is fitted with an electrode(s) and then tested to identify the most effective subject specific stimulation paradigms for facilitation of bladder voiding, e.g., using the herein described stimulation paradigms.
In various embodiments, the system is designed so that the patient can use and control it in the home environment.
In various embodiments, transcutaneous electrodes and/or electrode arrays are operably linked to control circuitry that permits selection of electrode(s) to activate/stimulate and/or that controls frequency, and/or pulse width, and/or amplitude of stimulation. In various embodiments, the electrode selection, frequency, amplitude, and pulse width are independently selectable, e.g., at different times, different electrodes can be selected. At any time, different electrodes can provide different stimulation frequencies and/or amplitudes. In various embodiments, different electrodes or all electrodes can be operated in a monopolar mode and/or a bipolar mode, using, e.g., constant current or constant voltage delivery of the stimulation.
It will be recognized that any present or future developed stimulation system capable of providing an electrical signal to one or more regions of the spinal cord may be used in accordance with the teachings provided herein.
In one illustrative but non-limiting system a control module is operably coupled to a signal generation module and instructs the signal generation module regarding the signal to be generated. For example, at any given time or period of time, the control module may instruct the signal generation module to generate an electrical signal having a specified pulse width, frequency, intensity (current or voltage), waveform (e.g., square wave, sinusoid, etc.), etc. The control module may be preprogrammed prior to use or receive instructions from a programmer (or another source). Thus, in certain embodiments the pulse generator/controller is configurable by software and the control parameters may be programmed/entered locally, or downloaded as appropriate/necessary from a remote site.
In certain embodiments the pulse generator/controller may include or be operably coupled to memory to store instructions for controlling the stimulation signal(s) and may contain a processor for controlling which instructions to send for signal generation and the timing of the instructions to be sent. In various embodiments the controller may record, receive, and transmit data as well.
While in certain embodiments, two leads are utilized to provide transcutaneous stimulation, it will be understood that any number of one or more leads may be employed. In addition, it will be understood that any number of one or more electrodes per lead may be employed. Stimulation pulses are applied to transcutaneous electrodes and/or electrode arrays (that typically are cathodes) with respect to a return electrode (which typically is an anode) to induce a desired area of excitation of electrically excitable tissue in one or more regions of the spine. A return electrode such as a ground or other reference electrode can be located on the same lead as a stimulation electrode. However, it will be understood that a return electrode may be located at nearly any location, whether in proximity to the stimulation electrode or at a more remote part of the body. It will be further understood that any number of one or more return electrodes may be employed. For example, there can be a respective return electrode for each cathode such that a distinct cathode/anode pair is formed for each cathode.
The methods and devices described herein are effective in a spinal cord injured subject that is clinically classified as motor complete; that is, there is no motor function below the lesion. In various embodiments, the specific combination of electrode(s) activated/stimulated and/or the desired stimulation of any one or more electrodes and/or the stimulation amplitude (strength) can be varied in real time, e.g., by the subject.
In various embodiments, the devices, optional pharmacological agents, and methods are designed so that a subject with partial or no voluntary bladder control can execute effective bladder voiding as desired or necessary.
The transcutaneous electrode stimulation systems described herein are intended to be illustrative and non-limiting. Using the teachings provided herein, alternative transcutaneous stimulation systems and methods will be available to one of skill in the art.
Physical Training.
It was demonstrated herein that training utilizing repeated bouts of electrical stimulation can improve bladder voiding and this effect can be augmented by additionally using physical training and/or neuromodulatory drugs in addition to eth electrical stimulation. In certain embodiments the physical training can provide postural, locomotor and/or reaching and grasping patterns in the subject. In certain embodiments the physical training can provide load bearing activities, postural/positional changes and/or sitting, and/or standing, and/or stepping activities.
In certain embodiments the physical training involves resistance training. In certain embodiments the training can involve the aid of assistive walkers and/or robotic devices or systems including, but not limited to an exoskeletal system and any robotic prosthetic device on extremity or trunk.
Use of Neuromodulatory Agents.
In certain embodiments, the transcutaneous and/or epidural stimulation methods described herein are used in conjunction with various pharmacological agents, particularly pharmacological agents that have neuromodulatory activity (e.g., are monoaminergic). In certain embodiments, the use of various serotonergic, and/or dopaminergic, and/or noradrenergic and/or GABAergic, and/or glycinergic drugs is contemplated. These agents can be used in conjunction with epidural stimulation and/or transcutaneous stimulation and/or physical training, e.g. as described above. This combined approach can help to put the spinal cord (e.g., the lumbosacral spinal cord) in an optimal physiological state for controlling voiding of the bladder.
In certain embodiments, the drugs are administered systemically, while in other embodiments, the drugs are administered locally, e.g., to particular regions of the spinal cord. Drugs that modulate the excitability of the spinal neuromotor networks include, but are not limited to combinations of noradrenergic, serotonergic, GABAergic, and glycinergic receptor agonists and antagonists. Illustrative pharmacological agents include, but are not limited to agonists and antagonists to one or more combinations of serotonergic: 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, 5-HT3, and 5HT7 receptors; to noradrenergic alpha 1 and 2 receptors; and to dopaminergic D1 and D2 receptors (see, e.g., Table 1).
In certain embodiments the subject is administered buspirone, and/or quipazine, and/or strychnine.
Systems for Bladder Control.
In various embodiments systems for controlling and/or improving bladder function in a mammal are provided. In certain embodiments the systems comprise one or more transcutaneous electrode(s) and/or an epidural electrode(s) electrically coupled to an electrical stimulator configured to deliver transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord through a transcutaneous electrode and/or epidural electrical stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord through an epidural electrode according to the methods described herein to initiate and/or regulate bladder function. In certain embodiments the system comprises an electrical stimulator coupled to an epidural electrode configured to deliver epidural stimulation as described herein. In certain embodiments the system comprises an electrical stimulator coupled to a transcutaneous electrode configured to deliver transcutaneous stimulation according to the methods described herein.
In certain embodiments the systems described herein further comprise an electronic device that records/monitors bladder filling. Using the information the bladder can be prevented from overfilling and/or from emptying inappropriately and bladder contraction can be administered when desired.
Sensors for monitoring bladder filling are described, for example, by Chew et al. (2013) Sci. Translat. Med., 5(210): 210ra155. Chew et al. describe an electronic device that can accurately record bladder filling from sensory nerves after spinal cord injury in rat. The device provides a design for a nerve-electrode interface that combines features of both sieve and cuff designs by confining axons in 100 μm diameter microchannels. The microchannels greatly increase extracellular resistance, thus amplifying recordable voltage potential. Inclusion of guard/reference electrodes at the ends of the microchannels suppresses noise interference. The device was developed into an implantable neuroprosthetic device with encapsulated electrodes to record cutaneous and bladder activity dorsal roots.
The device permits recording action potential firing that accurately encodes bladder filling. The device had multiple microchannels for concurrent recording, greatly improving the resolution. Using information produced by this device, bladder emptying can be artificially stimulated on demand by electrically modulating nerve firing using the methods described herein.
In certain embodiments the system(s) further include one or more training device(s) configured to assist with physical training of the subject. Illustrative training devices include, but are not limited to a treadmill, a walker, an exoskeleton, a weight machine, an exoskeleton, and an robotic training device.
The foregoing devices, systems, and methods are intended to be illustrative and non-limiting. Using the teachings provided herein, other methods involving transcutaneous electrical stimulation and/or epidural electrical stimulation and/or the use of neuromodulatory agents to improve bladder control will be available to one of skill in the art.
The following examples are offered to illustrate, but not to limit the claimed invention.
Regulation of Autonomic Control of Bladder Voiding after a Complete Spinal Cord Injury
This example demonstrates functionally overlapping sensorimotor networks controlling bladder and locomotion in a behaving, completely paralyzed rat, the activity-dependent functional plasticity of these networks, and a means of functionally separating the networks controlling micturition and locomotion with frequency-specific stimulation parameters.
Given the anatomical overlap in the neural networks within the lumbosacral spinal cord that control bladder function (de Groat et al. (1990) J. Autonom. Nervous Syst. 30: 71-77; de Groat and Yoshimura (2010) Neuro. & Urodynam., 29, 63-76) and locomotor function (Grinner and Zangger (1979) Exp. Brain Res. 34: 241-261; Barbeau and Rossignol (1987) Brain Res. 412: 84-95; Edgerton et al. (2001) J. Physiol. 533: 15-22), interactive effects of bladder function and locomotion are possible. For example, de Groat et al. (de Groat and Yoshimura (2010) Neuro. & Urodynam., 29, 63-76) reported that the role of afferents originating in the bladder and EUS projecting to the lumbosacral region of the spinal cord was altered significantly after a mid-thoracic SCI. This overlap in the neural control of somatic and bladder function could represent either two separate neural circuits with some overlap or a single circuit being tuned differentially via varying frequencies of activation. The purpose of the present study was, inter alia, to assess the acute and chronic effects of varying frequencies of electrical enabling motor control (eEmc) in the lumbosacral region of the spinal cord on bladder voiding after a complete, mid-thoracic spinal cord transection in adult female rats.
Results.
Interaction of Neural Networks Controlling Locomotion and Micturition
Rats with a complete mid-thoracic spinal cord transection can step bipedally on a treadmill when the upper body is supported in a harness (de Leon et al. (2002) Brain Res, Rev. 40: 267-273). During this body weight supported stepping, spontaneous voiding occurs intermittently with eEmc at 40 Hz between L2 and S1 and there are distinct changes in the locomotor pattern during the transition from no voiding of urine to a state where voiding is initiated (
Chronic Effects of Step Training on Bladder Voiding
Chronic step training under the influence of eEmc (40 Hz between L2 and 51) results in an increase in spontaneous bladder voiding both during routine cage activity as well as during treadmill stepping. The daily average volume of urine voided manually starting after 3 days of training (10 days post-SCI) and continuing for a period of 30 days was lower in step trained vs. untrained rats (
Acute Effect of eEmc on Bladder Voiding after SCI
We determined the effects of different frequencies of stimulation on voiding by infusing controlled quantities of saline into the bladder via a urethral catheter with step trained rats suspended in a harness as described above. One cc of saline was infused into the bladder via the urethral catheter at a steady rate since this did not result in any leakage of saline. Any volume higher than 1 cc resulted in visible leakage of saline. The most effective voiding was observed with 1-Hz stimulation, with almost 90-95% of the volume voided within 90 sec (
The responses evoked in a hindlimb extensor (soleus) and flexor (TA) muscle during 1-Hz stimulation were similar when the rats were voiding or not voiding (
We then investigated the electrophysiological responses to 1-Hz stimulation after infusing saline into the bladder. Infusion of saline initially resulted in a slight increase in the activation of the EUS muscle followed by a period when the EUS was inactive (
Stimulation at sub-threshold levels (threshold set at voiding intensity) with a filled bladder resulted in an evoked potential in the EUS (
Discussion.
It is well known that motor performance can be accompanied by changes of autonomic functions (somatic-visceral interactions). Recent studies of human subjects with motor complete paralysis report improvement in postural control and some voluntary movement in the legs, and the subjects anecdotally have reported improved autonomic function such as bladder, sexual, and thermoregulatory control (Harkema et al. (2011) Lancet, 377: 1938-1947; Angeli et al. (2014) Brain, 137: 1394-1409). In this study we show that enabling of locomotor-related spinal neuronal circuits by epidural stimulation also influences neural networks controlling bladder function. Herein we have demonstrated not only the long-term synergistic effects of epidural stimulation on locomotor and bladder function, but more importantly we have identified specific spinal cord stimulation parameters that initiate bladder emptying within seconds of the initiation of epidural stimulation.
Given the locations of the neural networks within the spinal cord that control autonomic function, the level and extent of a spinal cord lesion are important factors in the extent of loss of bladder function (Potter (2006) Progr. Brain Res. 152: 51-57). A complete mid-thoracic spinal cord transection in rats results in the loss of bladder function initially with some autonomically initiated spontaneous control returning in the following weeks, allowing for occasional but incomplete emptying (
It appears that epidural stimulation raises the net excitability level of spinal neural networks (interneurons and motoneurons) and when combined with motor training and/or pharmacological interventions, enhances the activation of the sensorimotor pathways that also control bladder function (Harkema et al. (2011) Lancet: 377: 1938-1947). Data presented herein demonstrate that in addition to the chronic effects, e.g., improved spontaneous bladder emptying associated with epidural stimulation and step training, we have discovered a unique spinal epidural stimulation paradigm which can overcome detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia and induce bladder emptying on demand in unanesthetized rats with a complete mid-thoracic spinal cord transection.
Spinal Cord Plasticity Mediating Locomotor and Bladder Function after a SCI
Within three days of the initiation of epidural stimulation and step training the rats started voiding spontaneously during cage activity and step training (
Frequency Dependent Tuning of the Automaticity of the Spinal Cord
The complex functioning of bladder voiding was achieved via an eEmc tonic drive at 1 Hz between L2 and S1. The conceptual basis of selecting a given eEmc parameter was to activate the neural networks that initiate the automaticity of the coordinated contractions and relaxations of the bladder and EUS that result in bladder voiding. During stimulation at 1 Hz, the bladder contracts tonically. This response occurs in the EUS within a 20 to 100 ms time window (
Stimulation at higher frequencies (40 Hz) at the same sites on the spinal cord (between L2 and 51) facilitates partial weight-bearing bipedal (Courtine et al. (2009) Nature Neurosci. 12: 1333-1342) and quadrupedal (Gad et al. (2012) J. Neuroengin. Rehab. 9: 38) stepping of spinal rats on a treadmill belt. A consistent bilateral air stepping pattern also is observed when the rats are suspended in a harness and under the influence of eEmc at 40 Hz and with sufficient levels of current (Gad et al. (2013) J. Neurophysiol. 110: 1311-1322) (
Neural Networks Controlling Locomotion and Micturition
Over the past several decades, multiple techniques have been used to induce micturition after SCI, including stimulation of the bladder wall, the pelvic nerve, and/or the sacral nerve. Directly stimulating the bladder wall induces local contractions, but high currents or a large number of electrodes are needed to induce a more widespread contraction to achieve sufficient bladder emptying. Pelvic nerve stimulation has been shown to contract the bladder wall, but as the pelvic nerve does not innervate the EUS minimal effect was seen on the EUS resulting in a low voiding efficiency (Holmquist and Tord (1968) Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 2: 129-135). Voiding was only achieved, however, by cutting the pudendal nerve. This largely irreversible procedure eliminates sensation from the external genitalia of both sexes and the skin around the anus and perineum, as well as the motor supply to various pelvic muscles, including the external urethral sphincter and the external anal sphincter. Sacral nerve stimulation seemed to offer the best results, but requires complicated surgical procedures and a serious risk of permanent damage via the intradural approach (Rijkhoff et al. (1997) J. Urol., 157: 1504-1508). Recently a closed-loop neuroprosthesis interface was used to measure bladder fullness through implanted afferent dorsal rootlets into microchannel electrodes to measure and interpret sensory activity related to bladder fullness in spinal rats (Chew et al. (2013) Sci. Transl. Med., 5: 210ra155). Voiding was achieved using low frequency anterior sacral nerve stimulation. While promising, the viability of this chronically implanted dorsal root microchannel electrode system in humans has yet to be established.
Each of the above strategies involves surgically severing nerves, result in permanent loss of some motor and sensory functions, and directly induce contractions in the bladder. Therefore, these strategies completely bypass the automaticity that is intrinsic to the sensorimotor neural circuitries present in the spinal cord. While epidural electrode array implantation also is invasive, similar surgical procedures are followed in routinely performed procedures to alleviate chronic pain. Moreover, no indwelling electrodes in spinal nerves or irreversible surgical denervation of nerves or rootlets are necessary. By preserving the sensorimotor networks that underlie the automaticity of micturition, as occurs with the recovery of stepping and standing after a complete spinal cord transection, bladder function can be largely re-established by enabling the inherent automaticity present within the spinal cord (Edgerton et al. (2001) J. Physiol. 533: 15-22; Edgerton et al. (2004) Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 27: 145-167). The spinal cord circuitry contains the necessary circuitry to control bladder voiding when provided the appropriate afferent information from the bladder and the sphincter. Based on frequency-specific stimulation parameters, the spinal cord can be tuned to enable the appropriate physiological response (
In summary, the main findings include 1) the demonstration of functional links between the neural control (biomechanical and electrophysiological) of locomotion and micturition in awake unanesthetized rats, 2) the immediate effect of in vivo spinal cord stimulation on micturition, and 3) the positive chronic effects of step training under the influence of eEmc and pharmacological interventions on bladder function.
Materials and Methods.
Study Design.
Study design Data were obtained from 15 (10 trained and 5 untrained) adult female Sprague Dawley rats (270-300 g body weight). Pre- and post-surgical animal care procedures have been described in detail previously (Roy et al. (1992) Lab. Animal Sci. 42: 335-343). The rats were housed individually with food and water provided ad libitum. All survival surgical procedures were conducted under aseptic conditions with the rats deeply anesthetized with isoflurane gas administered via facemask as needed. All procedures described below are in accordance with the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Animal Research Committee at UCLA. All animals underwent identical surgical procedures including spinal cord transection, intramuscular EMG implantation, and spinal cord epidural electrode implantation. The rats were allowed to recover for 7 days after which step training under the influence of eEmc was initiated. Step training was performed for 6 weeks, 5 days a week for 20 min/day. At 7 weeks post-injury, the rats were tested for their ability to step bipedally on a treadmill with eEmc (40 Hz), evoked potentials were elicited using eEmc (1, 5, and 40 Hz) while suspended in a harness, and terminal bladder experiments were performed. Details of each step are given below.
A small incision was made at the midline of the skull. The muscles and fascia were retracted laterally, small grooves were made in the skull with a scalpel, and the skull was dried thoroughly. Two amphenol head connectors with Teflon-coated stainless steel wires (AS632, Cooner Wire, Chatsworth Calif.) were securely attached to the skull with screws and dental cement as described previously (Courtine et al. (2009) Nature Neurosci. 12: 1333-1342). Selected hindlimb muscles, i.e., the tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus, were implanted bilaterally with intramuscular EMG recording electrodes as described previously (Id.). Skin and fascial incisions were made to expose the belly of each muscle. Two wires extending from the skull-mounted connector were routed subcutaneously to each muscle. The wires were inserted into the muscle belly using a 23-gauge needle and a small notch (˜0.5-1.0 mm) was removed from the insulation of each wire to expose the conductor and form the electrodes. The wires were secured in the belly of the muscle via a suture on the wire at its entrance into and exit from the muscle belly. The proper placement of the electrodes was verified during the surgery by stimulating through the head connector and post-mortem via dissection.
Spinal Cord Transection, Epidural Electrode Implantation, and Post-Surgical Animal Care Procedures
A partial laminectomy was performed at the T8-T9 vertebral level to expose the spinal cord. A complete spinal cord transection to include the dura was performed at approximately the T8 spinal level using microscissors. Two surgeons verified the completeness of the transection by lifting the cut ends of the spinal cord and passing a glass probe through the lesion site. Gel foam was inserted into the gap created by the transection as a coagulant and to separate the cut ends of the spinal cord. For epidural electrode implantation, partial laminectomies were performed to expose the spinal cord at spinal levels L2 and 51. Two Teflon-coated stainless steel wires from the head connector were passed under the spinous processes and above the dura mater of the remaining vertebrae between the partial laminectomy sites. After removing a small portion (˜1 mm notch) of the Teflon coating and exposing the conductor on the surface facing the spinal cord, the electrodes were sutured to the dura mater at the midline of the spinal cord above and below the electrode sites using 8.0 Ethilon suture (Ethicon, New Brunswick, N.J.). Two common ground (indifferent EMG and stimulation grounds) wires (˜1 cm of the Teflon removed distally) were inserted subcutaneously in the mid-back region. All wires (for both EMG and epidural stimulation) were coiled in the back region to provide stress relief. All incision areas were irrigated liberally with warm, sterile saline. All surgical sites were closed in layers using 5.0 Vicryl (Ethicon, New Brunswick, N.J.) for all muscle and connective tissue layers and for the skin incisions in the hindlimbs and 5.0 Ethilon for the back skin incision. All closed incision sites were cleansed thoroughly with saline solution. Analgesia was provided by buprenex (0.5-1.0 mg/kg, s.c. 3 times/day). The analgesics were initiated before completion of the surgery and continued for a minimum of 2 days. The rats were allowed to fully recover from anesthesia in an incubator. The rats were housed individually in cages that had ample CareFresh bedding, and the bladders of the spinal rats were expressed manually 3 times daily for the first 2 weeks after surgery and 2 times daily thereafter. During bladder expressions, the urine was collected in a weigh boat and measured using a syringe to quantify the total urine manually expressed each day. The hindlimbs of the spinal rats were moved passively through a full range of motion once per day to maintain joint mobility. These procedures have been described in detail previously (Id.).
Step Training.
Ten rats were step trained bipedally (Ichiyama et al. (2008) J. Neurosci. 28: 7370-7375) on a specially designed motor-driven rodent treadmill using a body weight support system (de Leon et al. (2002) Brain Res, Rev. 40: 267-273) under the influence of eEmc between L2 and S1 (40 Hz) and quipazine (Ichiyama et al. (2008) J. Neurosci. 28: 7370-7375) (0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) and strychnine (Gad et al. (2013) J. Neuroengineering and Rehab. 10: 108; Gad et al. (2013) J. Neurophysiol. 110: 1311-1322)[13, 14] (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) at a treadmill speed of 13.5 cm/s (Gad et al. (2013) J. Neuroengineering and Rehab. 10: 108). The rats were trained for a period of 6 weeks starting one week after the spinal transection surgery. Step training in spinal rats under the influence of pharmacological and/or spinal cord stimulation interventions are routine procedures that have been performed in our lab for several years (Courtine et al. (2009) Nature Neurosci. 12: 1333-1342; Ichiyama et al. (2008) J Neurosci. 28: 7370-7375; Gad et al. (2013) J. Neuroengineering and Rehab. 10: 108; Gad et al. (2013) J. Neurophysiol. 110: 1311-1322).
Testing Procedures.
All 15 rats (10 trained, 5 untrained) were tested under the following conditions: 1) the rats were tested to step bipedally at a treadmill speed of 13.5 cm/s while in a body weight support system under the influence of eEmc (40 Hz bipolar stimulation between L2 and S1); 2) evoked potentials were recorded from the hindlimb muscles during bipolar epidural stimulation between L2 and S1 (1, 5, and 40 Hz) while the rats were suspended in a harness (Ichiyama et al. (2008) J. Neurosci. 28: 7370-7375; Lavrov et al. (2006) J. Neurophysiol. 96: 1699-1710; Lavrov et al. (2008) J. Neurosci. 28: 6022-6029); and 3) acute terminal experiments for bladder function were performed 7 weeks post-SCI. Under anesthesia, a PE 50 catheter was inserted via the urethra (Rosas-Arellano et al. (1988) Physiol. & Behav. 43: 127-128) and secured in place using surgical tape. The EUS muscle was implanted acutely with Teflon coated stainless steel wires (AM systems) as described previously (D'Amico and Collins (2012) J. Neurophysiol. 108: 2554-2567). Once the animal was conscious, they were suspended vertically using the body weight support system with their feet off the treadmill surface (
Data Analysis.
EMG recordings from the TA, soleus, and EUS muscles were bandpass filtered (1 Hz to 5 KHz), amplified using an A-M Systems Model 1700 differential AC amplifier (A-M Systems, Carlsborg, Wash.), and sampled at a frequency of 10 KHz using a custom data acquisition program written in the LabView development environment (National Instruments, Austin, Tex.) as described previously (Courtine et al. (2009) Nature Neurosci. 12: 1333-1342). Custom scripts written in Matlab were used to measure the evoked potentials from the hindlimb and EUS muscles (Gad et al. (2013) J. Neurophysiol. 110: 1311-1322). Step cycle durations and EMG burst durations and amplitudes were determined using a custom program written in the LabView development environment. Burst integrated EMG (iEMG) was calculated as the area under the curve after rectification of the raw EMG signal.
Statistical Analyses.
All data are reported as mean±SEM. Statistically significant differences were determined using a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). The criterion level for the determination of a statistical difference was set at P<0.05 for all comparisons.
A wide range of animal spinal cord injury models and species have shown that stimulation applied to spinal neural networks can dramatically improve motor ability, i.e., enhance the ability to stand and step on a treadmill with partial body weight support (1. Iwahara et al. (1991) Somatosens. Mot. Res. 8:281-287; Gerasimenko et al. (2003) Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 33:247-254; Ichiyama et al. (2005) Neurosci. Lett. 383: 339-344; Gerasimenko et al. (2008) Exp. Neurol. 09: 417-425; Courtine et al. (2009) Nat. Neurosci. 12:1333-1342; Shah et al. (2012) Eur. J. Neurosci. 36:2054-2062). More recently three completely paralyzed human subjects (one classified as ASIA A and two as ASIA B) were implanted with a commercially available spinal cord electrode array and stimulation package originally designed for pain suppression (Harkema et al. (2011) Lancet, 377: 1938-1947; Angeli et al. (2012) SFN Abstracts 475.26/JJ12). Epidural stimulation of specific spinal segments (via caudal electrodes at ˜51 spinal level), in combination with the sensory information from the lower limbs and weeks of stand training, was sufficient to generate full weight-bearing standing. These subjects also recovered some voluntary control of movements of the toe, ankle, and the entire lower limb, but only when electrical enabling motor control (eEmc) was present. Thus, one possibility is that modulation of the excitability of the lumbosacral region of the spinal cord via eEmc, combined with the weak excitatory activity of descending axons that were not otherwise detectable, could volitionally achieve a level of excitation that was sufficient to activate the spinal motor circuits above the motor thresholds of a significant number of motoneurons among synergistic motor pools. These results in human subjects demonstrate that some patients clinically diagnosed as having complete paralysis can use proprioceptive information combined with some input from descending motor signals (perhaps residual but functionally silent without eEmc) to activate spinal motor circuits, thus generating and controlling a range of motor functions via eEmc.
There is some spontaneous activity in the paralyzed muscles after a complete mid-thoracic spinal cord transection. For example, the total amount of integrated EMG activity in the soleus and lateral gastrocnemius muscles in spinal cats during a 24-hr period was ˜25% and ˜33%, respectively, of that occurring in uninjured cats (Alaimo et al. (1984) J. Appl. Physiol. 56:1608-1613). The present experiment was designed to determine the feasibility of enhancing the amount of spontaneous cage activity of paralyzed muscles using sub-threshold intensities of stimulation via chronically implanted epidural electrodes placed over the lumbosacral spinal cord in adult spinal rats. We chose rats that had experienced a rehabilitation process to step on a treadmill for 6 weeks under the influence of eEmc because chronic step training engages and reinforces the locomotor networks that would potentially be activated during spontaneous cage activity. We determined the activity levels and movement patterns of the hindlimbs of rats having a complete spinal cord transection at a low thoracic level while in their home cages during 6-hr periods with and without continuous eEmc (40 Hz). We hypothesized that eEmc would modulate the spinal locomotor circuits such that the hindlimbs would be more active during periods with than without eEmc. This would have the effect of more frequently engaging those neural networks that control the routine, spontaneous postural and locomotor functions that are critical in defining the level of functionality after severe paralysis. In general, the results are consistent with this hypothesis.
Methods
General Animal Procedures
Data were obtained from 4 adult female Sprague Dawley rats (270-300 g body weight). Pre- and post-surgical animal care procedures have been described in detail previously (Roy et al. (1992) Lab. Anim. Sci. 42:335-343). The rats were housed individually with food and water provided ad libitum. All survival surgical procedures were conducted under aseptic conditions and with the rats deeply anesthetized with isoflurane gas administered via facemask as needed. All procedures described below are in accordance with the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Animal Research Committee at UCLA.
Head Connector and Intramuscular EMG Electrode Implantation
A small incision was made at the midline of the skull. The muscles and fascia were retracted laterally, small grooves were made in the skull with a scalpel, and the skull was dried thoroughly. Two amphenol head connectors with Teflon-coated stainless steel wires (AS632, Cooner Wire, Chatsworth Calif.) were securely attached to the skull with screws and dental cement as described previously (Ichiyama et al. (2005) Neurosci. Lett. 383: 339-344; Roy et al. (1992) Lab. Anim. Sci. 42:335-343). Selected hindlimb muscles, i.e., the tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (Sol), were implanted bilaterally with EMG recording electrodes as described by Roy et al. 91991) J. Appl. Physiol. 70:2522-2529. Skin and fascial incisions were made to expose the belly of each muscle. Two wires extending from the skull-mounted connector were routed subcutaneously to each muscle. The wires were inserted into the muscle belly using a 23-gauge needle and a small notch (˜0.5-1.0 mm) was removed from the insulation of each wire to expose the conductor and form the electrodes. The wires were secured in the belly of the muscle via a suture on the wire at its entrance into and exit from the muscle belly. The proper placement of the electrodes was verified during the surgery by stimulating through the head connector and post-mortem via dissection.
Spinal Cord Transection and eEmc Electrode Implantation Procedures and Post-Surgical Animal Care
A partial laminectomy was performed at the T8-T9 vertebral level. A complete spinal cord transection to include the dura was performed at approximately the T8 spinal level using microscissors. Two surgeons verified the completeness of the transection by lifting the cut ends of the spinal cord and passing a glass probe through the lesion site. Gel foam was inserted into the gap created by the transection as a coagulant and to separate the cut ends of the spinal cord.
For eEmc electrode implantation, partial laminectomies were performed to expose the spinal cord at spinal levels L2 and 51. Two Teflon-coated stainless steel wires from the head connector were passed under the spinous processes and above the dura mater of the remaining vertebrae between the partial laminectomy sites. After removing a small portion (˜1 mm notch) of the Teflon coating and exposing the conductor on the surface facing the spinal cord, the electrodes were sutured to the dura mater at the midline of the spinal cord above and below the electrode sites using 8.0 Ethilon suture (Ethicon, New Brunswick, N.J.). Two common ground (indifferent EMG and stimulation grounds) wires (˜1 cm of the Teflon removed distally) were inserted subcutaneously in the mid-back region. All wires (for both EMG and eEmc) were coiled in the back region to provide stress relief.
All incision areas were irrigated liberally with warm, sterile saline. All surgical sites were closed in layers using 5.0 Vicryl (Ethicon, New Brunswick, N.J.) for all muscle and connective tissue layers and for the skin incisions in the hindlimbs and 4.0 Ethilon for the back skin incision. All closed incision sites were cleansed thoroughly with saline solution. Analgesia was provided by buprenex (0.5-1.0 mg/kg, s.c. 3 times/day). The analgesics were initiated before completion of the surgery and continued for a minimum of 3 days. The rats were allowed to fully recover from anesthesia in an incubator. The rats were housed individually in cages that had ample CareFresh bedding, and the bladders of the spinal rats were expressed manually 3 times daily for the first 2 weeks after surgery and 2 times daily thereafter. The hindlimbs of the spinal rats were moved passively through a full range of motion once per day to maintain joint mobility. All of these procedures have been described in detail previously (Courtine et al. (2009) Nat. Neurosci. 12:1333-1342).
Stimulation and Testing Procedures
The rats went through a bipedal step training rehabilitation process (20 min a day, 5 days a week) for 6 weeks under the influence of eEmc at 40 Hz between L2 and S1 at an intensity just above threshold (Ichiyama et al. (2005) Neurosci. Lett. 383: 339-344) using a body weight support system (de Leon et al. (2002) Brain Res. 40:267-273). Chronic step training was used because it engages and reinforces the locomotor networks that would potentially be activated during spontaneous cage activity.
The rats were tested under two conditions with and without eEmc at 40 Hz between L2 and S1 at 6 weeks post-injury: 1) during bipedal stepping on a specially designed motor-driven rodent treadmill using a body weight support system (Gerasimenko et al. (2008) Exp. Neurol. 09: 417-425; Courtine et al. (2009) Nat. Neurosci. 12:1333-1342; Lavrov et al. (2006) J. Neurosci. 28:6022-6029; Ichiyama et al. (2008) J. Neurosci. 28:7370-7375); and 2) during spontaneous cage activity. The eEmc during treadmill locomotion was set just above threshold as described previously (Ichiyama et al. (2005) Neurosci. Lett. 383: 339-344). The threshold for eliciting a muscle twitch and corresponding time linked EMG response (soleus was used as the reference muscle) was between 1.8 to 2 V for all rats. The sub-threshold level then was set at 20% below the motor threshold, i.e., between 1.4 and 1.6 V, during the recording of spontaneous cage activity.
The spontaneous activity levels of the spinal rats were determined in their home cage. The head connector was connected via cables to a set of amplifiers and a stimulator. A swivel arrangement was attached to the cables near the head connector to allow the rats to move freely in the cage. Food (pellets, pieces of fruit, and fruit loops) was distributed throughout the cage floor to encourage movement and exploration. Video data were recorded using a camcorder with a series of IR LEDs to enable recording in the dark, i.e., the active period for the rats. EMG data were amplified and recorded using custom LabView-based data acquisition software with a sampling frequency of 10 kHz. Data were recorded for 6 continuous hours starting at 8:00 pm and ending at 2:00 am. EMG recordings from the hindlimb muscles were bandpass filtered (1 Hz to 5 KHz), amplified using an A-M Systems Model 1700 differential AC amplifier (A-M Systems, Carlsborg, Wash.), and sampled at a frequency of 10 KHz using a custom data acquisition program written in the LabView development environment (National Instruments, Austin, Tex.) as described previously (Courtine et al. (2009) Nat. Neurosci. 12:1333-1342).
Data Analysis
The energy in the EMG signal for both muscles was calculated by estimating the area under the curve after rectification of the raw EMG (integrated EMG) as previously described (Roy et al. (1992) Lab. Anim. Sci. 42:335-343; Viitasalo and Komi (1977) Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 37:111-121; Whiting et al. (1984) J. Biomech. 17: 685-694). The amounts of integrated EMG per one-min periods of stepping and spontaneous cage activity were compared. The EMG responses during spontaneous cage activity were binned in 1-min snippets for detailed analysis. A frequency distribution was constructed by estimating the energy within each 1-min bin and joint probability distributions to show the relationship between the activity of the soleus and TA were plotted. Video data were analyzed to estimate the total amount of time that the rats were active (mobile) in their home cages during the 6-hr recording period.
Statistical Analyses
All data are reported as mean±SEM. Statistically significant differences were determined using paired t-tests. The criterion level for the determination of a statistical difference was set at P<0.05 for all computations.
Results.
Evidence of Enabling Vs. Inducement of Neuromuscular Activity
We carefully examined the relationship between the absence or presence of eEmc and the amount and pattern of spontaneous cage activity. In the absence of eEmc there were periods of spontaneous activity when the rats remained in a sitting posture (
A sub-motor threshold intensity of eEmc is evident by the absence of any time-linked evoked muscle responses (
We compared the pattern of EMG activity during step-like movements generated spontaneously in the cage (
The total amount of time that the rats were active during these recordings was ˜5-fold higher in the presence compared to the absence of eEmc, i.e., ˜2500 sec or ˜12% of the time vs. ˜500 sec or ˜2.5% of the time (
There was a larger number of one-min bins with relatively high levels of integrated EMG activity with than without eEmc distributed across the 6-hr recording period for both the TA and soleus (
Spinal circuits controlling stepping and standing after a spinal cord injury can be improved by practicing those tasks, i.e., increasing the activation of those circuits (Rosas-Arellano et al. (1988) Physiol. & Behav. 43: 127-128; D'Amico and Collins (2012) J. Neurophysiol. 108: 2554-2567). In the present study we show that there is a minimal amount of spontaneous activity in the sensorimotor circuits that can facilitate standing and stepping after a mid-thoracic spinal cord transection in adult rats. eEmc below the level of the lesion, enhanced the amount of spontaneous activity several-fold (
Does the elevated motor activity observed with sub-threshold spinal cord stimulation reflect some level of “voluntary” control? The report that a completely paralyzed human subject can regain the ability to stand under the influence of eEmc (Id.) raises the question as to whether this can be considered to be “voluntarily” initiated either indirectly or via some “reflex” mechanism. There are no “reflexes” described, however, that have the motor output features performed by the paralyzed subject noted above nor the rats in the present study. While there are no widely accepted criteria for describing if a task is performed “voluntarily”, the human subjects acquired the ability to initiate and sustain standing on command. Whether this could be viewed as being either a “voluntary” or an “automated” response, the subjects were able to volitionally position the upper body in a manner that increased weight bearing on the lower limbs with a critical level of eEmc. This, in turn, engaged the proprioceptive input to the spinal cord from the hindlimbs resulting in more weight-bearing activity, essentially as it seems to have been the case in the rats. To what extent can one routinely and voluntarily engage proprioception to perform a motor task? We propose that the observations in the spinal rats in the present study parallel the human data in that the rats increased their cage activity levels in the presence of sub-motor threshold stimulation intensities (
The experiments in both rats (van den Brand et al. (2012) Science, 336: 1182-1185) and humans (Harkema et al. (2011) Lancet, 377: 1938-1947; Angeli et al. (2012) SFN Abstracts 475.26/B12) were designed to engage the “paralyzed circuits” during a specific training-rehabilitation time period in the presence of stimulation. Since the level of stimulation necessary to achieve the results noted above appeared to have little or no recognizable direct motor or behavioral effects on the animal or human subjects, we tested the hypothesis that sustained sub-threshold levels of activity in the normal cage environment would result in greater spontaneous activity among those spinal circuits that generate and control standing and stepping in rats. The implications of these observations are that the training effects induced via formal motor rehabilitation sessions could be greatly amplified during periods of routine daily activity enhanced by eEmc. These results now raise the question as to whether a general increase in activity as observed herein will result in improved standing and stepping ability compared to rats not stimulated, especially given the issue of the specificity of training. In this light, recent findings by Garcia-Alias et al. (Garcia-Alias et al. (2009) Nat. Neurosci. 12: 1145-1151) demonstrate that rats that are housed in an enriched environment after a spinal cord injury are more active and perform significantly better in reaching and locomotor tasks than those housed in standard cages. In addition, we have studied the effects of one stimulation paradigm and it is highly likely that other stimulation paradigms may produce more robust task-specific effects.
The spinal rats in the present study were more spontaneously active with than without eEmc, even though they were housed in standard cages. It seems likely that a combination of eEmc and an enriched housing environment would result in even greater levels of spontaneous activity, particularly in rats that are completely paralyzed. Issues related to the type and intensity of the activity performed by a spinal cord injured patient (or animal) during the prolonged daily periods without any formal rehabilitation treatment (most likely >23 hrs) have come to the forefront only recently. Even in normal humans (Finni et al. (2012) Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01456.x) and animals (Hodgson et al. (2005) Exp. Biol. 208: 3761-3770) 80-90% of the daily activity occurs at very low levels of activation of almost all motor pools. With the ability to carefully quantify muscle and body activity, surprising results have been reported in how daily activity levels change when uninjured individuals begin physical training (Finni et al. (2012) Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01456.x).
The critical questions raised now are whether the effect of epidural stimulation alone or in combination with an enriched environment would result in improved performance of reaching, standing, and locomotion and how much and what type of spontaneous activity is sufficient to enhance each of these motor tasks. Can motor performance be improved after severe paralysis by enabling the spinal circuitry during routine daily activities in the home in addition to the specific training that occurs during structured rehabilitation sessions? The spontaneous activity that may occur in a wide range of sensorimotor pathways may result in progressive improvement in specific tasks requiring fine motor control of the hands or in postural and locomotor functions, particularly if the same motor pathways are engaged as they are during scheduled rehabilitative sessions.
In the present study we demonstrate that that there is an enhanced amount of spontaneous activity in the sensorimotor circuits that can facilitate standing and stepping after a mid-thoracic spinal cord transection in adult rats using chronic subthreshold eEmc below the level of the lesion suggesting a novel ‘self-training’ phenomenon.
It is understood that the examples and embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only and that various modifications or changes in light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled in the art and are to be included within the spirit and purview of this application and scope of the appended claims. All publications, patents, and patent applications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
This application is a U.S. 371 National Phase of PCT/US2015/046378, filed on Aug. 21, 2015, which claims benefit of and priority to U.S. Ser. No. 62/040,334, filed on Aug. 21, 2014, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
This invention was made with government support under Grant No. EB007615, awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2015/046378 | 8/21/2015 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2016/029159 | 2/25/2016 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3543761 | Bradley | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3662758 | Glover | May 1972 | A |
| 3724467 | Avery et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
| 4044774 | Corbin et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4102344 | Conway et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4141365 | Fischell et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4285347 | Hess | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4340063 | Maurer | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4379462 | Borkan et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4414986 | Dickhudt et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4538624 | Tarjan | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4549556 | Tajan et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4559948 | Liss et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4573481 | Bullara et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4800898 | Hess et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4934368 | Lynch | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4969452 | Petrofsky et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5002053 | Garcia-Rill et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5031618 | Mullett | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5066272 | Eaton et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5081989 | Graupe et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5121754 | Mullett | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5344439 | Otten | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5354320 | Schaldach et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5374285 | Vaiani et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5417719 | Hull et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5476441 | Durfee et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5562718 | Palermo | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5643330 | Holsheimer et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5733322 | Starkebaum | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5983141 | Sluijter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6066163 | John | May 2000 | A |
| 6104957 | Alo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6122548 | Starkebaum et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6308103 | Gielen | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6319241 | King et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6470213 | Alley | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6500110 | Davey et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6503231 | Prausnitz et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6505074 | Boveja et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6551849 | Kenney | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6587724 | Mann | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6662053 | Borkan | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6666831 | Edgerton et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6685729 | Gonzalez | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6819956 | DiLorenzo | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6839594 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6862479 | Whitehurst et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6871099 | Whitehurst et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6892098 | Ayal et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6895280 | Meadows et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6895283 | Erickson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6937891 | Leinders et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6950706 | Rodriguez et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6975907 | Zanakis et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6988006 | King et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6999820 | Jordan | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7020521 | Brewer et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7024247 | Gliner et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7035690 | Goetz | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7047084 | Erickson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7065408 | Herman et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7096070 | Jenkins et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7110820 | Tcheng et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7127287 | Duncan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7127296 | Bradley | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7127297 | Law et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7153242 | Goffer | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7184837 | Goetz | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7200443 | Faul | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7209787 | DiLorenzo | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7228179 | Campen et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7239920 | Thacker et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7251529 | Greenwood-Van Meerveld | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7252090 | Goetz | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7313440 | Miesel et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7324853 | Ayal et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7330760 | Heruth et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7337005 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7337006 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7381192 | Brodard et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7415309 | Mcintyre | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7463928 | Lee et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7467016 | Colborn | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7493170 | Segel et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7496404 | Meadows et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7502652 | Gaunt et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7536226 | Williams et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7544185 | Bengtsson | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7584000 | Erickson | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7590454 | Garabedian et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7603178 | North et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7628750 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7660636 | Castel et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7697995 | Cross et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7729781 | Swoyer et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7734340 | De Ridder | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7734351 | Testerman et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7769463 | Katsnelson | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7797057 | Harris | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7801601 | Maschino et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7813803 | Heruth et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7813809 | Strother et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7856264 | Firlik et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7877146 | Rezai et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7890182 | Parramon et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7949395 | Kuzma | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949403 | Palermo et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7987000 | Moffitt et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7991465 | Bartic et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8019427 | Moffitt | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8050773 | Zhu | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8108052 | Boling | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8131358 | Moffitt et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8155750 | Jaax et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8170660 | Dacey, Jr. et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8190262 | Gerber et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8195304 | Strother et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8214048 | Whitehurst et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8229565 | Kim et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8239038 | Wolf, II | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8260436 | Gerber et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8271099 | Swanson | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8295936 | Wahlstrand et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8311644 | Moffitt et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8332029 | Glukhovsky et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8346366 | Arle et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8352036 | DiMarco et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8355791 | Moffitt | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8355797 | Caparso et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8364273 | De Ridder | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8369961 | Christman et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8412345 | Moffitt | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8428728 | Sachs | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8442655 | Moffitt et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8452406 | Arcot-Krishnamurthy et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8588884 | Hegde et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8700145 | Kilgard et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8712546 | Kim et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8750957 | Tang et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8805542 | Tai et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 9072891 | Rao | Jul 2015 | B1 |
| 9101769 | Edgerton et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9205259 | Kim et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9205260 | Kim et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9205261 | Kim et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9272143 | Libbus et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9283391 | Ahmed | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9393409 | Edgerton et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9415218 | Edgerton et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9610442 | Yoo et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9993642 | Gerasimenko et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10137299 | Lu et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 20020055779 | Andrews | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111661 | Cross et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020115945 | Herman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020193843 | Hill et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030032992 | Thacker et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078633 | Firlik et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100933 | Ayal et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158583 | Burnett et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220679 | Han | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233137 | Paul, Jr. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040039425 | Greenwood-Van Meerveld | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044380 | Bruninga et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111118 | Hill et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111126 | Tanagho et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122483 | Nathan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127954 | McDonald et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133248 | Frei et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138518 | Rise et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20050004622 | Cullen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070982 | Heruth et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075669 | King | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075678 | Faul | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102007 | Ayal et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113882 | Cameron et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050119713 | Whitehurst et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125045 | Brighton et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209655 | Bradley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246004 | Cameron et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278000 | Strother et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060003090 | Rodger et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041295 | Osypka | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060089696 | Olsen et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100671 | Ridder | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060111754 | Rezai et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060122678 | Olsen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060142816 | Fruitman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060142822 | Tulgar | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149333 | Tanagho et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149337 | John | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060239482 | Hatoum | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070016097 | Farquhar et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016266 | Paul, Jr. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070049814 | Muccio | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055337 | Tanrisever | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060954 | Cameron et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060980 | Strother et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073357 | Rooney et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083240 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156179 | Karashurov | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070168008 | Olsen | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179534 | Firlik et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070191709 | Swanson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208381 | Hill et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233204 | Lima et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255372 | Metzler et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265679 | Bradley et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265691 | Swanson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276449 | Gunter et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276450 | Meadows et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080021513 | Thacker et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080046049 | Skubitz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051851 | Lin | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071325 | Bradley | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103579 | Gerber | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080140152 | Imran et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080140169 | Imran | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147143 | Popovic et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154329 | Pyles et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183224 | Barolat | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080200749 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080202940 | Jiang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080207985 | Farone | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080215113 | Pawlowicz | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080221653 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080228241 | Sachs | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080228250 | Mironer | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080234791 | Arle et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080279896 | Heinen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090012436 | Lanfermann et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090093854 | Leung et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090112281 | Miyazawa et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090118365 | Benson, III et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090157141 | Chiao et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198305 | Naroditsky et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204173 | Fang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090270960 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090281599 | Thacker et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090299166 | Nishida et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090299167 | Seymour | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090306491 | Haggers | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100004715 | Fahey | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023103 | Elborno | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100042193 | Slavin | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070007 | Parker et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100114239 | McDonald et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125313 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137938 | Kishawi et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100145428 | Cameron et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100152811 | Flaherty | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185253 | Dimarco et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198298 | Glukhovsky et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217355 | Tass et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100228310 | Shuros et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100241191 | Testerman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100268299 | Farone | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274312 | Alataris et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100305660 | Hegi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318168 | Bighetti | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100331925 | Peterson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110029040 | Walker et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110040349 | Graupe | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110054567 | Lane et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110054568 | Lane et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110054579 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125203 | Simon et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110130804 | Lin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110152967 | Simon et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110160810 | Griffith | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110166546 | Jaax et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184488 | De Ridder | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184489 | Nicolelis et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110218594 | Doran et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224665 | Crosby et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224752 | Rolston et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224753 | Palermo et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224757 | Zdeblick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110230701 | Simon et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110245734 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110276107 | Simon et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110288609 | Tehrani et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110295100 | Rolston et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120006793 | Swanson | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120029528 | Macdonald et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120035684 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101326 | Simon et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120109251 | Lebedev et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120109295 | Fan | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120123293 | Shah et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120126392 | Kalvesten et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120165899 | Gliner | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120172946 | Altaris et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179222 | Jaax et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185020 | Simon et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197338 | Su et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120221073 | Southwell et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120232615 | Barolat et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120252874 | Feinstein et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120259380 | Pyles | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277824 | Li | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277834 | Mercanzini et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120283697 | Kim et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120283797 | De Ridder | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120302821 | Burnett | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120310305 | Kaula et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120310315 | Savage et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120330391 | Bradley et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130013041 | Glukhovsky et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130030319 | Hettrick et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130030501 | Feler et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130053734 | Barriskill et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130053922 | Ahmed et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130066392 | Simon et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130085317 | Feinstein | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130110196 | Alataris et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130123568 | Hamilton et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130123659 | Bartol et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130165991 | Kim et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130197408 | Goldfarb et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130253299 | Weber et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130253611 | Lee et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130268016 | Xi et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130268021 | Moffitt | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130281890 | Mishelevich | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130289446 | Stone | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130303873 | Voros et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130304159 | Simon et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130310911 | Tai et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140031893 | Walker et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140046407 | Ben-Ezra et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140058490 | DiMarco | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140066950 | Macdonald et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140067007 | Drees et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140067354 | Kaula et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140081071 | Simon et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100633 | Mann et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140107397 | Simon et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140107398 | Simon et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140114374 | Rooney et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140163640 | Edgerton et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140180361 | Burdick et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140213842 | Simon et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140236257 | Parker et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296752 | Edgerton et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140303901 | Sadeh | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140316484 | Edgerton et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140316503 | Tai et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140324118 | Simon et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140330067 | Jordan | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140330335 | Errico et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140357936 | Simon et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150065559 | Feinstein et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150165226 | Simon et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150182784 | Barriskill et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150190634 | Rezai et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150231396 | Burdick et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150265830 | Simon et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20160030737 | Gerasimenko et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160030748 | Edgerton et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160045727 | Rezai et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160045731 | Simon et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160074663 | De Ridder | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160121109 | Edgerton et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160121114 | Simon et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160121116 | Simon et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160175586 | Edgerton et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160220813 | Edgerton et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160235977 | Lu et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160339239 | Yoo et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170007831 | Edgerton et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170157389 | Tai et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170165497 | Lu | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170246450 | Liu et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170246452 | Liu et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170296837 | Jin | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20180185642 | Lu | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180256906 | Piyonka et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180280693 | Edgerton et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180361146 | Gerasimenko et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190022371 | Chang et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190167987 | Lu et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190381313 | Lu | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2012204526 | Jul 2013 | AU |
| 2 823 592 | Jul 2012 | CA |
| 2661307 | Nov 2013 | EP |
| 2968940 | Jan 2016 | EP |
| 2130326 | May 1999 | RU |
| 2141851 | Nov 1999 | RU |
| 2160127 | Dec 2000 | RU |
| 2178319 | Jan 2002 | RU |
| 2192897 | Nov 2002 | RU |
| 2001102533 | Nov 2002 | RU |
| 2226114 | Mar 2004 | RU |
| 2258496 | Aug 2005 | RU |
| 2361631 | Jul 2009 | RU |
| 2368401 | Sep 2009 | RU |
| 2387467 | Apr 2010 | RU |
| 2396995 | Aug 2010 | RU |
| 2397788 | Aug 2010 | RU |
| 2445990 | Mar 2012 | RU |
| 2471518 | Jan 2013 | RU |
| 2475283 | Feb 2013 | RU |
| WO 97047357 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 03026735 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 03092795 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004087116 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005051306 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005087307 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO 2007007058 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007107831 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008109862 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008121891 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009042217 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009111142 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010055421 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010114998 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010124128 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| WO 2012094346 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012100260 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012129574 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| WO 2013071307 | May 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013071309 | May 2013 | WO |
| WO 2014144785 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2015048563 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| WO 2016029159 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016033369 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016033372 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO 2017011410 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017024276 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017035512 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017044904 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2018140531 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018217791 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2020041502 | Feb 2020 | WO |
| WO 2020041633 | Feb 2020 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/355,812. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/355,812. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/355,812. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/208,529. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/208,529. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/208,529. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/025,201. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 1, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/025,201. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/775,618. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/775,618. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 18, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/775,618. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Jul. 30, 2012 issued in PCT/US2012/020112. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Jul. 10, 2013 issued in PCT/US2012/020112. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 19, 2013 issued in PCT/US2012/064878. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 22, 2014 issued in PCT/US2012/064878. |
| Australian Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Jul. 11, 2016 issued in AU 2012334926. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2018 issued in CA 2,864,473. |
| European Communication pursuant to Rule 114(2) EPC regarding observations by a third party dated Mar. 27, 2015 issued in EP 12 847 885.6. |
| European Extended Search Report dated May 6, 2015 issued in EP 12 847 885.6. |
| European Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2016 issued in EP 12 847 885.6. |
| European Reply to Communication of Apr. 15, 2016 dated Oct. 24, 2016 in EP 12 847 885.6. |
| European Second Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2017 issued in EP 12 847 885.6. |
| PCT Declaration of Non-Establishment of International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 24, 2014 issued in PCT/US2014/057886. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Apr. 7, 2016 issued in PCT/US2014/057886. |
| Australian Examination report No. 1 dated Jan. 11, 2019 issued in AU 2014324660. |
| European Extended Search Report dated May 10, 2017 issued in EP 14849355.4. |
| European Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2018 issued in EP 14849355.4. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 6, 2014 issued in PCT/US2014/029340. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 24, 2015 issued in PCT/US2014/029340. |
| Australian Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated May 11, 2018 issued in AU 2014228794. |
| European Extended Search Report dated Nov. 8, 2016 issued in EP 14 76 5477.6. |
| European Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2018 issued in EP 14 76 5477.6. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 5, 2016 issued in PCT/US2016/045898. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Feb. 15, 2018 issued in PCT/US2016/045898. |
| European Extended Search Report dated Dec. 13, 2018 issued in EP 16833973.7. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 8, 2015 issued in PCT/US2015/047268. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Feb. 28, 2017 issued in PCT/US2015/047268. |
| European Extended Search Report dated Mar. 1, 2018 issued in EP 15836927.2. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 3, 2015 issued in PCT/US2015/047272. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Feb. 28, 2017 issued in PCT/US2015/047272. |
| PCT Declaration of Non-Establishment of International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 1, 2015 issued in PCT/US2015/046378. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Feb. 21, 2017 issued in PCT/US2015/046378. |
| European Extended Search Report dated Apr. 4, 2018 issued in EP 15834593.4. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 12, 2016 issued in PCT/US2016/041802. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Jan. 25, 2018 issued in PCT/US2016/041802. |
| European Extended Search Report dated Feb. 19, 2019 issued in EP 16825005.8. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 5, 2016 issued in PCT/US2016/049129. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Mar. 8, 2018 issued in PCT/US2016/049129. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 12, 2018 issued in PCT/US2018/015098. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 31, 2018 issued in PCT/US2018/033942. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 19, 2013 issued in PCT/US2012/064874. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Mar. 19, 2013 issued in PCT/US2012/064878. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Sep. 3, 2012 issued in PCT/US2012/022257. |
| PCT International Search Report dated Oct. 31, 2012 issued in PCT/US2012/030624. |
| Angeli et al. (2014) “Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans” Brain 137: 1394-1409. |
| Courtine, Grégoire et al. (2007) “Modulation of multisegmental monosynaptic responses in a variety of leg muscles during walking and running in humans,” J Physiol. 582.3:1125-1139. |
| Danner S.M., Hofstoetter U.S., Ladenbauer J., Rattay F., and Minassian K. (Mar. 2011) “Can the human lumbar posterior columns be stimulated by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation? A modeling study” Europe PMC Funders Author Manuscripts, Artif Organs 35(3):257-262, 12 pp. |
| DeSantana et al. (Dec. 2008) “Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Hyperalgesia and Pain,” Curr Rheumatol Rep. 10(6):492-499, 12 pp. |
| Dubinsky, Richard M. and Miyasaki, Janis, “Assessment: Efficacy of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation in the treatment of pain in neurologic disorders (an evidence-based review),” Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, (2010) Neurology, 74:173-176. |
| Edgerton and Harkema (2011) “Epidural stimulation of the spinal cord in spinal cord injury: current status and future challenges” Expert Rev Neurother. 11(10): 1351-1353. doi:10.1586/ern.11.129 [NIH Public Access—Author Manuscript—5 pages]. |
| Fong et al. (2009) “Recovery of control of posture and locomotion after a spinal cord injury: solutions staring us in the face,” Progress in Brain Research, Elsevier Amsterdam, NL,175:393-418. |
| Ganley et al., (2005) “Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Improves Locomoter Performance in Low ASIA C, Wheelchair-Dependent, Spinal Cord-Injured Individuals: Insights from Metabolic Response,” Top. Spinal Cord lnj. Rehabil;11(2):50-63. |
| Gerasimenko Y., Gorodnichev R., Machueva E., Pivovarova E., Semyenov D., Savochin A., Roy R.R., and Edgerton V.R., (Mar. 10, 2010) “Novel and Direct Access to the Human Locomotor Spinal Circuitry,” J Neurosci. 30(10):3700-3708, PMC2847395. |
| Gerasimenko Y.P., Ichiyama R.M., Lavrov I.A., Courtine G., Cai L., Zhong H., Roy R.R., and Edgerton V.R. (2007) “Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Plus Quipazine Administration Enable Stepping in Complete Spinal Adult Rats,” J Neurophysiol. 98:2525-2536. |
| Harkema et al. (2011) “Effect of Epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study” Lancet 377(9781): 1938-1947; NIH Public Access Author Manuscript 17 pages. [doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60547-3]. |
| Herman R., He J., D'Luzansky S., Willis W., Dilli S., (2002) “Spinal cord stimulation facilitates functional walking in a chronic, incomplete spinal cord injured,” Spinal Cord. 40:65-68. |
| Hofstoetter, U.S. et al. (Aug. 2008) “Modification of Reflex Responses to Lumbar Posterior Root Stimulation by Motor Tasks in Healthy Subjects,” Artif Organs, 32(8):644-648. |
| Ichiyama et al. (2005) “Hindlimb stepping movements in complete spinal rats induced by epidural spinal cord stimulation” Neuroscience Letters, 383:339-344. |
| Kitano K., Koceja D.M. (2009) “Spinal reflex in human lower leg muscles evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation,” J Neurosci Methods. 180:111-115. |
| Minasian et al. (2010) “Transcutaneous stimulation of the human lumbar spinal cord: Facilitating locomotor output in spinal cord injury,” Conf. Proceedings Soc. for Neurosci., Abstract No. 286.19, 1 page. |
| Minassian et al. (Aug. 2011) “Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation,” International Society for Restorative Neurology, http://restorativeneurology.org/resource-center/assessments/transcutaneous-lumbar-spinal-cord-stimulation/; http://restorativeneurology.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Transcutaneous-spinal-cord-stimulation_long.pdf, 6 pp. |
| Minassian et al. (Mar. 2007) “Posterior root-muscle reflexes elicited by transcutaneous stimulation of the human lumbosacral cord,” Muscle & Nerve 35:327-336. |
| Nandra et al., (2014) “Microelectrode Implants for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Rats,” Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, Defended on Sep. 24, 2014, 104 pages. |
| Nandra et al., (Jan. 23, 2011) “A Parylene-Based Microelectrode Arrary Implant for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Rats,” Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., pp. 1007-1010. |
| Rodger et al., (2007) “High Density Flexible Parylene-Based Multielectrode Arrays for Retinal and Spinal Cord Stimulation,” Transducers & Eurosensors, Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Lyon, France, Jun. 10-14, 2007, IEEE, pp. 1385-1388. |
| Seifert et al. (Nov. 1, 2002) “Restoration of Movement Using Functional Electrical Stimulation and Bayes' Theorem,” The Journal of Neuroscience, 22(1):9465-9474. |
| Tanabe et al. (2008) “Effects of transcutaneous electrical stimulation combined with locomotion-like movement in the treatment of post-stroke gait disorder: a single-case study,” 30(5):411-416 abstract, 1 page. |
| Ward, Alex R. (Feb. 2009) “Electrical Stimulation Using Kilohertz-Frequency Alternating Current ,” (2009) Phys Ther.89(2):181-190 [published online Dec. 18, 2008]. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/208,529. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/208,529. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/750,499. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/506,696. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/344,381. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2019 issued in CA 2,864,473. |
| Australian Examination report No. 2 dated Nov. 7, 2019 issued in AU 2014324660. |
| European Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2019 issued in EP 14765477.6. |
| Australian Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Jul. 18, 2019 issued in AU 2015308779. |
| Australian Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Jun. 14, 2019 issued in AU 2015305237. |
| European Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2019 issued in EP 15834593.4. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Jul. 30, 2019 issued in PCT/US2018/015098. |
| Andersson, et al., (2003) “CNS Involvement in Overactive Bladder.” Drugs, 63(23): 2595-2611. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/200,467. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/975,678. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated May 4, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/506,696. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/740,323. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/344,381. |
| Australian Examination report No. 3 dated Jan. 6, 2020 issued in AU 2014324660. |
| Australian Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Jan. 6, 2020 issued in AU 2019206059. |
| European Extended Search Report dated Apr. 21, 2020 issued in EP 19201998.2. |
| Australian Patent Examination Report No. 2 dated Apr. 17, 2020 issued in AU 2015305237. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Nov. 26, 2019 issued in PCT/US2018/033942. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 14, 2019 issued in PCT/US2019/047777. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 21, 2019 issued in PCT/US2019/047551. |
| Drummond, et al. (1996) “Thoracic impedance used for measuring chest wall movement in postoperative patients,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, 77: 327-332. |
| Hovey, et al. (2006) “The Guide to Magnetic Stimulation,” The Magstim Company Ltd, 45 pages. |
| Kapetanakis, et al. (2017) “Cauda Equina Syndrome Due to Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Review of Literature,” Folia Medial, 59(4): 377-86. |
| Kondo, et al. (1997) “Laser monitoring of chest wall displacement,” Eur Respir J., 10: 1865-1869. |
| Niu et al., (2018) “A Proof-of-Concept Study of Transcutaneous Magnetic Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neurogenic Bladder,” Scientific Reports, 8: 12549 (12 pages). |
| Wang, et al. (2017) “Incidence of C5 nerve root palsy after cervical surgery,” Medicine, 96(45), 14 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170274209 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62040334 | Aug 2014 | US |
