Aspects of the present disclosure relate generally to power regulation in semiconductor circuits, and more particularly to regulation/bypass automation for low drop-out regulator (LDO) with multiple supply voltages.
As semiconductor technology advances, many systems on a chip (SoCs) can operate at lower voltage supply (e.g., 1.8V), resulting in lower overall power consumption. However, the need to support legacy devices that operate at higher voltage supplies (e.g., 5V, 3.3V, etc.) remains. Therefore, there is a need in the art to provide a more flexible and efficient LDO to allow advance process SoCs to support legacy devices.
The following presents a simplified summary of one or more embodiments in order to provide a basic understanding of such implementations. This summary is not an extensive overview of all contemplated implementations, and is intended to neither identify key or critical elements of all embodiments nor delineate the scope of any or all implementations. The sole purpose of this summary is to present some concepts of one or more embodiments in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
In some implementations, a low drop-out regulator (LDO) includes a first resistor having a first terminal and a second terminal; and a p-type pass transistor having a source, a gate, and a drain to output a voltage Vout, the source coupled to a supply voltage, the gate coupled to an output of an operational transconductance amplifier (OTA), and the drain coupled to the first terminal of the first resistor. The LDO further includes a p-type feedback switch having a drain, a gate, and a source, the drain coupled to the second terminal of the first resistor, the source coupled to a positive input of the OTA. The LDO further includes an n-type pull-down transistor having a drain, a gate, and a source, the source coupled to ground, the gate coupled to the gate of the p-type feedback transistor, and the drain coupled to the negative input of the OTA, wherein the gate of the n-type pull-down transistor and the gate of the p-type feedback switch are configured to receive a bypass signal.
In some implementations, the LDO further includes a second resistor having a first terminal and a second terminal. The second terminal is coupled to ground and the first terminal is coupled to the second terminal of the first resistor.
In some implementations, the bypass signal is asserted when the supply voltage is at approximately 1.8V. The bypass signal can be de-asserted when the supply voltage is at 3.3V or 5.0 V. The LDO enters a bypass mode when the bypass signal is asserted. On the other hand, the LDO enters a regulation mode when the bypass signal is de-asserted.
In some implementations, the LDO operates in the regulation mode by default when the LDO is powered on.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the one or more embodiments include the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims. The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative aspects of the one or more embodiments. These aspects are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of various embodiments may be employed and the description embodiments are intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents.
The detailed description set forth below, in connection with the appended drawings, is intended as a description of various configurations and is not intended to represent the only configurations in which the concepts described herein may be practiced. The detailed description includes specific details for the purpose of providing a thorough understanding of the various concepts. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that these concepts may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well-known structures and components are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring such concepts.
System on a chip (SoC) design in advanced technology node needs to interface with multiple input/output (I/O) voltage supplies, including higher voltages in legacy devices. A uniform power-on sequence for various I/O supplies is a must-have feature for power management unit (PMU) to shorten product development time. A regulator, typically, a low drop-out regulator (LDO), is needed to lower the I/O voltage supply when interfacing with legacy products or bypass I/O voltage supply when the I/O voltage supply is about the same as in the SoC. In other words, a normal mode (a.k.a. a regulation mode) and a bypass mode are needed in today's SoC designs as conceptually illustrated in
In some advanced technology nodes, high voltage (HV) devices are used to interface with legacy high I/O supply voltage. Though the drain source voltage (Vds) range of the HV devices is increased, gate source voltage (Vgs) is still limited (e.g., Vgs has to be equal to or below 1.8V in 28 nm node). Internal logic level has to be 1.8V even if I/O supply voltage is at a higher level (e.g., 5 V, 3.3 V), or 1.8V in the example shown in
One conventional SoC design 200 is shown in
Another issue with the SoC design 200 in
A switch 328 is coupled between the gate of pass transistor 326 and the drain of transistor 324 to switch between the regulation or bypass modes. However, as discussed above, in advanced process nodes (e.g., 28 nm or beyond), 3.3V/0V voltage cannot be applied to the switch 328 due to reliability concern.
In some implementations, the LDO can automate regulation or bypass dual mode function for 1.8V I/O voltage delivery during power-on event to support legacy I/O voltages at 5V or 3.3V (e.g., Customers A and B, respectively, in
Referring to
In some implementations, transistor 524 is coupled in parallel to capacitor 531. The drain of transistor 524 is coupled to the gate of pass transistor 526. The source of pass transistor 526 is coupled to voltage supply VddH and the drain of the pass transistor 526 is coupled to output resistor 529a and output capacitor 532. Output resistors 529a and 529b are coupled in series between pass transistor 526 and ground, while output capacitor 532 is coupled in parallel to output resistors 529a and 529b.
In some implementations, at least two more transistors 542 and 544 are added to the feedback path between output resistor 529a and the gate of transistor 521 (i.e., the negative input terminal of the OTA). Transistor 542 may be referred to as a feedback switch or feedback transistor, whereas transistor 544 may be referred to as a pull-down switch or pull-down transistor. Referring to
LDO 520 can go into bypass mode when supply voltage VddH is at 1.8V, or regulation mode when supply voltage VddH is at 5V or 3.3V. In some implementations, LDO 520 is configured into one of the bypass mode or regulation mode in response to bypass signal 501. When bypass signal 501 is at a logical “0”, transistor 542 is turned on to close the feedback loop, resulting in an output of 1.8V at the drain of pass transistor 526. Thus, LDO 520 goes into regulation mode. When bypass signal 501 is at a logical “1”, transistor 542 is turned off to open (or break) the feedback loop, and transistor 544 is turned on to pull the gate of transistor 521 to ground. Thus, LDO 520 goes into bypass mode.
LDO 520 can work with a number of infrastructural blocks in a SoC to support customer devices requiring different voltage supplies. One implementation of a SoC 500 having LDO 520 and other infrastructural blocks is shown in
In some implementations, a voltage supply VddH from a customer device external to SoC 500 is input to bandgap reference generator 512, resistor divider 514, V2IR block 516, and LDO 520. As discussed above, the voltage supply can be at 5 V or 3.3V for legacy customer devices, or 1.8V for current customer devices. Bandgap reference generator 512 is configured to output a bandgap voltage vbg at about 1.23V. The signal vbg remains substantially constant at about 1.23V when voltage supply VddH is available. The signal vbg is then input to V2IR 516 and LDO 520. Resistor divider 514 is configured to divide voltage supply VddH received with about 0.3 ratio to produce a signal vddhdiv, which can be at about 1.5V, 0.99V, or 0.54V if VddH is at 5V, 3.3V, or 1.8V, respectively. Using combinations of on-chip resistors within V2IR 516, V2IR 516 is configured to convert vbg into IR currents that translate into three voltage signals, namely, v1p23 at about 1.23V, v0p9 at about 0.9V, and v0p74 at about 0.74V. These three voltage signals are also substantially constant when both VddH and vbg are available. The signal v0p9 is then input to Ok detector 518, and the signal v0p74 is input to a positive input terminal of bypass comparator 510. A negative input terminal of bypass comparator 510 receives vddhdiv from resistor divider 514. Bypass comparator 510 outputs bypass signal 501. LDO 520 also receives vbg (which is at about 1.23V) from bandgap reference generator 512. LDO 520 further receives bypass signal 501 output from bypass comparator 510. As discussed above with reference to
One exemplary power-on sequence of SoC 500 is shown in
In addition to solving the reliability problem, the architecture of LDO 520 also provides the following advantages. First, the architecture of LDO 520 is not limited to three external power supply voltages. More threshold voltages can be added in to detect more external power supply voltages. Further, the external power supply voltage range can be wider in some implementations, e.g., 2.1V-5V/1.8V and can generate 1.8V internal power supply if low threshold is set to about 0.59V and the saturation voltage Vdsat of LDO pass transistor (e.g., transistor 526 in
If it is determined that bypass signal is not asserted at block 720, then the method transitions to block 750. At block 750, the feedback switch is turned on to close the feedback loop in LDO 520 to cause LDO 520 to generate a regulated output voltage, e.g., a regulated 1.8V. In other words, LDO 520 goes into regulation mode when bypass signal is de-asserted.
The previous description of the disclosure is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the disclosure. Various modifications to the disclosure will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other variations without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. Thus, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the examples described herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5631598 | Miranda et al. | May 1997 | A |
6046577 | Rincon-Mora et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6147550 | Holloway | Nov 2000 | A |
6188211 | Rincon-Mora et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188212 | Larson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6359427 | Edwards et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6522111 | Zadeh et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6586917 | Smith | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6617832 | Kobayashi | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6791390 | Gay | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6856124 | Dearn et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7109690 | Ke | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7148670 | Inn et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7492137 | Yamada | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7504814 | Lee et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7548051 | Tenbroek et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7710090 | Kimura | May 2010 | B1 |
8072196 | Li | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8248150 | Tadeparthy et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8294441 | Gurcan et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8841893 | Bulzacchelli et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9223329 | Pulvirenti et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9274534 | Fang et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9377798 | Bhattad | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9543826 | Chen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9588541 | Ho et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9608522 | Lin et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9684325 | Rasmus | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9740225 | Wong | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9778672 | Gao et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9946283 | Yung et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
10013005 | Ippili | Jul 2018 | B1 |
20040027097 | Denicholas et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040140845 | Eberlein | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050189930 | Wu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050206444 | Perez et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050248331 | Whittaker et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060164053 | Walter et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060181258 | Benbrik | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070057655 | Nishida | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070139030 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070242536 | Matsubara | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080211467 | Huang et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080278127 | Nagata | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080303496 | Schlueter et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090010035 | Williams | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090179622 | Ivanov | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090189591 | Sperling et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090243568 | Nguyen | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090322429 | Ivanov et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100213917 | Pulijala et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100327959 | Lee | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110089916 | Soenen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120112718 | Pons | May 2012 | A1 |
20120187897 | Lenk et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120229111 | Serdarevic | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130082671 | Ivanov | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130099764 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130113447 | Kadanka | May 2013 | A1 |
20130221940 | Yan et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140042998 | Saito et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140084896 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140139198 | Manlove et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140266103 | Wang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277812 | Shih et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140306676 | Hu et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150028828 | Chen | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150103566 | Keogh et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150115830 | Siessegger | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150130434 | Jain et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150137780 | Lerner et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150160668 | Pujol et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150168969 | Shor | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150192943 | Roham et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150198959 | Kuttner | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150198960 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150220096 | Luff | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150349622 | Lo et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150362936 | Patel | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160124448 | Murukumpet et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160349776 | Conte et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170052552 | Mahmoudi et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170117803 | Matsuki et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170205841 | Jefremow et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170212540 | Cho et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170220059 | Kadowaki | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170322575 | Du et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170364110 | Golara et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170371365 | Kossel | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180217623 | Bhattad et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190146532 | Ballarin et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1175018 | Mar 1998 | CN |
101419477 | Apr 2009 | CN |
108445950 | Aug 2018 | CN |
1253498 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2014042726 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Akhamal H., et al., “Fast Transient Response Low Drop-out Voltage Regulator,” International Journal of Embedded Systems and Applications (IJESA), Sep. 2014, vol. 4, No. 2/3, pp. 1-10. |
Alon E., et al., “Replica Compensated Linear Regulators for Supply-Regulated Phase-Locked Loops,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 41, No. 2, Feb. 2006, pp. 413-424. |
Assi A., et al., “A Fully Differential and Tunable CMOS Current Mode opamp Based on Transimpedance-Transconductance Technique” , Circuits and Systems, 1997. Proceedings of the 40th Midwest Symposium on Sacramento, CA, USA Aug. 3-6, 1997, New York, NY, USA, IEEE, US, vol. 1, Aug. 3, 1997 (Aug. 3, 1997), pp. 168-171, XP010272437, DOI: 10.1109/MWSCAS.1997.666060, ISBN: 978-0-7803-3694-0. |
Bontempo G., et al., “Low Supply Voltage, Low Quiescent Current, ULDO Linear Regulator,” The 8th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems 2001, pp. 409-412. |
Bulzacchelli J.F., et al., “Dual-Loop System of Distributed Microregulators With High DC Accuracy, Load Response Time Below 500 ps, and 85-mV Dropout Voltage,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 863-874. |
Camacho D., et al., “An NMOS Low Dropout Voltage Regulator with Switched Floating Capacitor Gate Overdrive,” Department of Electrical Engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, USA, 52nd IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Aug. 2009, pp. 808-811. |
Den Besten G.W., et al., “Embedded 5 V-to-3.3 V Voltage Regulator for Supplying Digital IC's in 3.3 V CMOS Technology,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 33, No. 7, Jul. 1998, pp. 956-962. |
Gupta V., et al., “A Low Dropout, CMOS Regulator with High PSR over Wideband Frequencies”, IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 2005, pp. 4245-4248. |
Hazucha P., et al., “Area-Efficient Linear Regulator With Ultra-Fast Load Regulation”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 40, No. 4, Apr. 2005, pp. 933-940. |
Huang H.Y., et al., “A Wideband CMOS Transconductance-Transimpedance Amplifier”, Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems. Cairo, Egypt, Dec. 27-30, 2003; [Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems], Piscataway, NJ, IEEE, US, vol. 1, Dec. 27, 2003 (Dec. 27, 2003), pp. 153-156, XP010867413, DOI: 10.1109/MWSCAS.2003.1562241, ISBN: 978-0-7803-8294-7. |
Lu Y., et al., “A 0.65ns-Response-Time 3.01ps FOM Fully-Integrated Low-Dropout Regulator with Full-Spectrum Power-Supply—Rejection for Wideband Communication Systems,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Technical Papers, Feb. 2014, pp. 306-307. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.researchgate.net/publication/271550565. |
Milliken R.J., et al., “Full on-chip CMOS low-dropout voltage regulator”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, vol. 54, No. 9, Sep. 2007, pp. 1879-1890. |
Rincon-Mora G.A., et al., “A Low-Voltage, Low Quiescent Current, Low Drop-Out Regulator,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Jan. 1998, vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 36-44. |
Teel J.C., “Understanding power supply ripple rejection in linear regulators”, Analog Applications Journal, Analog and Mixed-Signal Products, 2005, 4 Pages. |