This application is a National Stage of International patent application PCT/GB2013/053319, filed on Dec. 17, 2013, which claims priority to foreign United Kingdom patent application No. GB 1223274.0, filed on Dec. 21, 2012, and priority to foreign United Kingdom patent application No. GB 1309301.8, filed on May 23, 2013, and priority to foreign United Kingdom patent application No. GB 1320157.9, filed on Nov. 14, 2013, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
This invention relates to a simplified method of forming structures from assemblages of hollow blocks (for example hollow concrete blocks or like building units), some or all of which are placed around steel rebars or around similar elongate reinforcements, or have such reinforcements placed within their hollow interiors, the hollow interior space then being filled with wet or semi dry concrete, which when cured forms a reinforced concrete core within the blockwork. This construction method may be used for example to form blockwork clad, reinforced concrete columns, which may be used as a replacement for a wind post in a blockwork infill in a pre-existing load bearing building structure, as disclosed in our patent specifications WO2009/098446 and WO2012/063074. However the construction method is of more general applicability.
WO2012/063074 describes building a column of stack bonded hollow concrete blocks which are filled with reinforced concrete to form a reinforced concrete core. A cleat is fixed to a foundation, floor slab, beam or like pre-existing load bearing structure in a position at the base of where it is desired to erect the column. Bolts, expansion bolts or other appropriate fasteners are used for such fixing, passing through holes in a base plate of the cleat. A pair of terminal rebars is then fitted to the cleat by engaging tubular sockets welded to their ends over a corresponding pair of spigots upstanding from the cleat base plate. A bed of mortar or like jointing material is spread around the base of the cleat. A hollow block is then laid in the mortar in the correct position to form the first course of encasing masonry for the column. The upper rim of the block just laid is spread with a layer of mortar and the next block is laid in stack bond on top of it. Further blocks are laid similarly in succession until only just sufficient length of each terminal rebar protrudes above the top block to form a lap joint with a length of plain rebar (or other elongate reinforcement) which is to be joined to the projecting rebar upper end. Once the lap joints have been secured e.g. by wire ties or the like, further hollow blocks can be laid in stack bond, threaded over the tops of the plain rebars. Further lengths of plain rebar (or other elongate reinforcement) can be secured by lap joining until the desired height of the column is reached. The cavity enclosed by the stacked hollow blocks can be filled with concrete or other cementitious material at suitable intervals as block laying progresses. If desired, alternate courses may be formed using two separate halves of a hollow block, so that the pointing pattern of the column blends with that of an adjacent panel of blockwork, apart from the discontinuity formed by an expansion joint interposed between the column and the panel. Additionally or alternatively, one or both sides of the reinforced concrete filled blockwork column may be keyed/bonded to the adjacent blockwork panel; adjacent courses of blocks being laid in staggered relationship with each other, e.g. so that a stretcher bond pattern in the panel extends into the reinforced concrete filled column. Such structures are described in WO2009/098446.
These building methods require skilled labour to carry them out. A particular difficulty arises when thin walled blocks are used, as is preferred, in order to maximise the cross-section and hence the strength of the reinforced concrete core of the blockwork column. The upper rim of such hollow blocks is quite narrow (as little as 20 mm wide) and it is therefore difficult to spread an even layer of mortar on this rim, upon which to lay the next block to form the column. Mortar is easily dislodged or dropped into the hollow interior of the column. This not only is a waste of mortar, but may also contaminate and weaken the reinforced concrete filling or its bond to the foundation. A supplementary problem arises in that every block used to form the column must be lifted over the upper ends of the rebars and then treaded back down the rebars to its final position. This extra lifting and lowering of masonry units is physically demanding. Joining successive lengths of rebar as the height of the column increases is also rather time consuming.
The present invention aims to mitigate these problems by providing a method of forming a structure comprising reinforced concrete or cemetitious material filled masonry units, comprising laying a hollow masonry unit in a first course; filling the hollow interior of the masonry unit with reinforced concrete or cemetitious material so that the concrete overflows and is spread out across the upper surface of the masonry unit to form a bed joint, and laying a further masonry unit upon the bed joint in a second course. The exposed edges of the bed joint concrete can be pointed in the usual way to provide a neat appearance to the finished bed joint.
Preferably the reinforced concrete comprises an elongate reinforcement extending between the hollow interiors of the masonry units in the first and second courses. The method may comprise installing the elongate reinforcement through the full height of the eventual structure, before laying the hollow masonry unit in the first course. The elongate reinforcement may comprise a rebar. A lower end of the elongate reinforcement may be bonded, e.g. using synthetic resin, such as epoxy resin, into a hole drilled into a foundation, floor slab or beam. The upper end of the elongate reinforcement may be slidably inserted into a socket forming part of a cleat secured to a soffit. Alternatively the upper end of the elongate reinforcement may comprise a sleeve into which a spigot forming part of a cleat secured to a soffit is inserted. Preferably a clearance is left between the upper end of the elongate reinforcement at the bottom of the sleeve and the tip of the spigot, or between the upper end of the elongate reinforcement and the inner end of the cleat socket, to allow for relative movement between the soffit and the top of the masonry structure. The rebars may be installed by drilling the holes in the foundation or the like, sufficiently deep to allow the top end of the elongate reinforcement to lie below and clear of the cleat. The rebar can then be raised so that its upper end overlaps and extends into/over the cleat to the required extent, and be supported in this position while the bonding material cures in the hole. Alternatively a cleat can be used to secure the lower end of the elongate reinforcement to the foundation, floor slab or beam. The elongate reinforcement may comprise a single continuous length of rebar, or may comprise a plurality of rebar lengths joined end to end by suitable sleeve couplings, or connected together by lap joints.
The wall of the hollow masonry unit may comprise a through-going vertical slot, enabling it to be placed laterally around the elongate reinforcement without having to be lifted over a free upper end of the elongate reinforcement and then lowered into position. This not only eliminates the lifting/lowering effort otherwise required, but also allows a complete length of reinforcement to be pre-installed between for example a foundation or the like and a soffit or the like. Block laying can therefore proceed as a continuous operation, without requiring intervention of a different trade for installation of fresh rebar.
For optimum strength, the concrete preferably comprises aggregate having the largest maximum grain size compatible with a given bed joint thickness. For example, with 10 mm thick bed joints, the concrete mixture may comprise approximately one part modified Portland cement including a plasticiser, to approximately one part grit or pea gravel of maximum 6 mm approximate grain size, to one part fine soft sand. Alternatively in some cases sharp sand may be preferred if this improves the strength of the cured concrete or cementitious material, albeit possibly at the expense of reduced workability of the material in its role as a mortar.
Illustrative embodiments of the invention and their preferred features and advantages are described below with reference to the drawings, in which:
Yet alternatively, the cleat may comprise tubular sockets (not shown) in which the upper ends of the rebars are slidably received, again preferably with movement clearance. The lower ends of the rebars 14, 16 are grouted into holes 34 drilled into the foundation 20, using a suitable high strength grout 36, such as epoxy resin. The holes include sufficient clearance depth D below the lower ends of the rebars in their final position, to enable the rebar upper end sleeves 24 to be engaged over the spigots 26 or into the sockets of a socketed cleat or into the soffit holes if no cleat is used. Such a clearance depth may not be necessary in the case of multi-part rebars such as 16. Yet alternatively, a cleat may be used to secure the lower ends of the rebars to the foundation 20 and the upper ends may be received in holes drilled in the soffit 18, as shown in
Masonry laying commences by spreading on the foundation around the base of the rebars 14, 16, a layer 38 (
The hollow interior of the block 10a is then filled with the uncured cementitious mix, to a level about 12-15 mm higher than the top rim of the block (see
The interior of block 10b may then be filled with concrete/cementitious material which also forms a bed joint layer spread out over the upper edge of block 10b, in the same way as for block 10a (see
The hollow blocks 10, filled with concrete/cementitious material which also is used to form the bed joints between adjacent courses, the blocks preferably being slotted so as to allow them to be threaded laterally over rebars to be embedded in the filled block interiors, can be used to form other structures besides stack bonded columns. For example, as shown in
The bracket 60 is then lowered along the rebars 14, 16 in the direction of arrow C, until its shorter limb 60b enters a vertical slot 66 formed in a block 68 which has been laid as part of the adjacent masonry panel (
To allow horizontal longitudinal movement of the panel relative to the column while still resisting transverse relative movement (shear movement) between the column and panel, and/or resisting bending moments arising from bowing of the panel, the shorter limb 60b of the bracket may be omitted or remain unbent. In that case, the portion of the bracket 60c extending into the masonry panel may be provided with a movement sleeve 72 of a suitable material such as metal, plastics or a sealant-impregnated fabric wrapping, to be built into the bed joint, as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1223274.0 | Dec 2012 | GB | national |
1309301.8 | May 2013 | GB | national |
1320157.9 | Nov 2013 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2013/053319 | 12/17/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/096802 | 6/26/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2118936 | Malinovszky | May 1938 | A |
2627176 | Levy | Feb 1953 | A |
3292331 | Sams | Dec 1966 | A |
3296758 | Knudsen Kirkkejner | Jan 1967 | A |
3691708 | Firnkas | Sep 1972 | A |
3717967 | Wood | Feb 1973 | A |
3968615 | Ivany | Jul 1976 | A |
4272940 | Nicolls | Jun 1981 | A |
4563852 | Achtenberg | Jan 1986 | A |
4726567 | Greenberg | Feb 1988 | A |
4953332 | Galloway | Sep 1990 | A |
5007218 | Bengtson | Apr 1991 | A |
5355647 | Johnson | Oct 1994 | A |
5379562 | Hohmann | Jan 1995 | A |
5878544 | McKinnon | Mar 1999 | A |
6195955 | Kostopoulos | Mar 2001 | B1 |
7448179 | Schieffer | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20090013638 | Clarno | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100107545 | Montague | May 2010 | A1 |
20110041447 | Philipp | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20150052837 | Gomes | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
663959 | Sep 1993 | AU |
31 37 335 | Apr 1983 | DE |
8900283 | Apr 1989 | DE |
102004030921 | Jan 2006 | DE |
0378217 | Oct 1995 | EP |
2469272 | Oct 2010 | GB |
2002-339480 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2008015407 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2009098446 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009147427 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2012063074 | May 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
www.itacanet.org/doc-archive-eng/contruction/conintro.pdf An Introduction to Cement & Concrete Adapted from the VITA Village Technology Handbook, Rural Building by John van Winden, 1986 and Hand Book of Gravity-Flow Water Sytems by T. Jordan, Sep. 1980. |
http://www.arpnjournals.com/jeas/research—papers/rp—2013/jeas—0613—901.pdf ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 8, No. 6, Jun. 2013. |
https://www.woarjournals.org/admin/vol—issue1/upload%20Image/IJGAES021610.pdf Properties of Different Grades of Concrete Using Mix Design Method, vol. 2, Issue 6, Dec. 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150300007 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |