1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to impact sockets, and in particular to lightweight sockets such as extended length impact sockets.
2. Background of the Invention
Impact sockets are well known in the art. Impact sockets are rotated by impact wrenches, impact guns or guns. These guns are designed to deliver high torque output with minimum exertion by the user, by storing energy in rotating mass such as a hammer, and the sudden delivery of the energy to the output shaft. Guns use compressed air, hydraulics or electrical energy. Guns are used for precise output torque. Impact sockets can be used for every standard socket, wrench drive size, from small one quarter inch sizes to over three and one half inch sizes.
Impact sockets are traditionally made from high strength alloy steel. Steel is a particularly good material for impact sockets because it is able to absorb considerable energy without failure. The ability of a metal to absorb energy without fracture is known as “toughness.” “Fracture toughness” is a measure of the stress required to propagate cracking in a material that contains microflaws such as grain boundaries and second phase particles or occlusions. Steel sockets are forged to achieve grain orientation in the material that gives the socket high fracture toughness when loaded. Type 4047 steel is often used in impact sockets. Other types of high strength alloy steel are Type 4140 and Type 4340.
One problem with steel is its relative heaviness when compared with lightweight metals such as aluminum. Lightweight impact sockets are much desired when used overhead, particularly with extended length impact sockets such as those sockets that are greater than 3½ inches in length. In one instance, a lightweight deep impact socket (a deep socket is used for turning a nut on a bolt, and the bolt extends into the socket) was made from aluminum. Each impact socket was made from 7075 aluminum, and the maker of the sockets was Fastorq Bolting Systems of Houston, Tex. They were turned by a Racine hydraulic impact gun, and also by a Fairmount hydraulic impact gun. The impact guns were listed as being capable of producing 500 foot-pounds torque. Four 7075 aluminum sockets were tested, and all failed. The characteristics of the four failed aluminum impact sockets were as follows:
The 7075 aluminum alloy used for the four preceding aluminum impact sockets is the highest strength aluminum in the aluminum family. The 4047 steel is 2.8 times heavier than the 7075 aluminum, but the 4047 steel is far greater than 2.8 times resistant to breakage when impact loaded. Material strength properties vary with the speed of load application. An important difference between static and impact loading is that statically loaded sockets must be designed to carry loads, whereas impact sockets must be designed to absorb energy. Steel such as 4047 steel has the requisite toughness and fracture toughness. The aluminum impact sockets are machined, not forged, and have poor fracture toughness properties when loaded in torsion as the multiaxial stress state induced imposes simultaneous elastic and plastic deformation in the material. When torque is applied in the area of the drive stem, the material is not uniformly loaded across its load bearing cross section. Therefore, it is likely that the 7075 aluminum impact socket will develop cracks and fail no matter how thick and beefy it is made. An impact socket must be able to withstand wear, and 7075 aluminum has extremely poor wear resistant properties compared to 4047 heat-treated steel.
An object of the present invention is to provide a lightweight impact socket capable of long life under normal operating conditions.
Another object is to provide an extended length lightweight impact socket capable of long life under normal operating conditions.
It is a further object to provide a lightweight impact socket for overhead use which is capable of having a long life under heavy duty work load.
It is yet another object to provide a lightweight impact socket having high wear resistant properties when compared with high strength aluminum impact sockets.
Still yet a further object of the present invention is to provide a lightweight impact socket capable of sustained repeated loading at 500 foot-pounds torque.
Another object is to provide a lightweight socket to be driven various powered tools and manual tools.
According to the preferred embodiment of the invention, an aluminum extended length impact socket blank was fitted with a high strength, heat-treated alloy steel insert at the fastener or socket end of the impact socket blank, and with a high strength, heat-treated alloy steel insert at the drive end of the impact socket blank; a high strength, heat-treated alloy steel sleeve was adhered to the drive end of the blank to add further strength and toughness to the drive end. The inserts were all held in place by glue, and the sleeve was press fit onto the aluminum blank.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention was prepared after the almost immediate failure of the extended length, deep impact sockets made from 7075 aluminum which were used on hydraulic guns listed as generating 500 foot-pounds torque. The inventor glued with an appropriate adhesive, a socket insert made from high strength, heat-treated alloy steel into the socket end of a 7075 aluminum steel blank. The blank had an enlarged socket end, and the socket insert had the desired size for the nut or bolt to be turned. A high strength, heat-treated alloy steel sleeve was press fit onto the drive end of the aluminum blank, and a high strength, heat-treated alloy steel insert with a square axial orifice was glued to the drive end of the aluminum blank to provide a square fitting for the hydraulic gun. The aluminum blank was dimensioned so that the latter steel sleeve and insert have the proper dimensions to be driven by the gun. Extended test on the foregoing prototype yielded no failures.
Turning first to
Fastener end 3 has a hex configuration 7. Drive end 5 has a square fitting 9 whose corners are rounded by a circle having a radius R. For the 12 inch socket length for aluminum blank 1, R equals 0.125 inches. The side dimension of square fitting 9 for the latter 12 inch blank 1 was 0.999 to 1.000 inches. Aluminum blank 1 can be manufactured in various ways such as machining, but for a commercial product extrusion would be the most economical.
A completed impact socket 11 according to the invention is shown in
The steel insert of the socket of the aluminum blank, as well as insert for the drive end and pressed-on sleeve, are heat treated as are conventional impact sockets. The heat treatment is conducted after the respective parts are machined to change the physical properties of the steel, after which the heated steel parts are quenched in oil to improve their strength, but also making them brittle. The parts are then tempered at specified temperatures to reduce the brittle characteristics. The inserts can be manually inserted.
The steel insert at the fastener end, the steel insert at the drive end, the steel sleeve on the outside surface of the drive end provide excellent devices for heavy duty use. Heavy duty means at least ½ inch driving square for fairly consistent use. Long life in many instances means years of use, although in some applications such as using impact sockets according to the invention would be a year or so.
The present invention has yielded an extremely useful lightweight impact socket for use where such lightweight impact sockets are desirable. The impact socket according to the invention was tested and showed far superior results to the aluminum impact socket which failed almost immediately upon testing. The impact socket according to the invention was an extended length impact socket which underwent about 20,000 loadings with a 500 foot-pounds impact load without failure. The weight increase with the high strength, heat-treated steel alloy was minimal, yet turned out an extremely useful tool which would be expected to last as long as a high strength, heat-treated steel alloy impact socket. Steel extended length impact sockets usually the ratchet or tang of an impact gun have a square side of ½ inch or more, and can weigh 4½ pounds or more, whereas a corresponding impact socket of the present invention would weigh around 2 pounds. The cost of the glue or adhesive is generally insignificant, and the cost of inserting the socket end insert, the drive end insert and can be done manually with minimal training. Steel sleeves according to the invention are preferably press fit onto the blank, and the press fit both holds the sleeve in place and strengthens the drive end. The invention can also be used with sockets turned by powered ratcheting tools and by manually operated tools as well, for particular use in overhead places such as substations and mines.
Impact sockets (and regular sockets) according to the present invention find particular advantage in overhead use. Such overhead use includes use by linesmen, including those on repair trucks for turning nuts and bolts above a work station, use in mines for assembling overhead support structure and building construction.
The invention has been described in detail with particular emphasis on the preferred embodiment, but variation and modifications may occur to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2788690 | Able | Apr 1957 | A |
3951556 | Strizki | Apr 1976 | A |
4014417 | Kugler et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4040770 | Carlson | Aug 1977 | A |
4082144 | Marquis | Apr 1978 | A |
4145939 | Garrison | Mar 1979 | A |
4289340 | Press et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4469057 | Black | Sep 1984 | A |
4786271 | Menn | Nov 1988 | A |
5495659 | Beakes et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5630264 | Tsuji | May 1997 | A |
5819606 | Arnold | Oct 1998 | A |
5970826 | Iwinski et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6029547 | Eggert et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6067702 | Clemenz et al. | May 2000 | A |
6126882 | Iwinski et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6374709 | Vasichek et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397706 | Maznicki | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6609445 | Elmore | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6962098 | Eggert et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
20050169764 | Heyes et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090064825 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |