This patent relates to packaging for large products such as furniture and household appliances. More particularly, this patent relates to a tubular-type package support post reinforced with separate tubular structures to provide increased resistance to axial and lateral compression forces.
Warehousing and distribution environments drive the need for devices that protect products (such as furniture and appliances) from both axial (vertical) and lateral (horizontal) forces. Axial forces mainly are caused by stacking packaged products in warehouses. Lateral forces can be caused by stacking, clamp handling and basiloid handling, and also by collisions inherent in warehouse and distribution systems.
Corner posts consisting essentially of formed hollow paperboard tubes are often used to support and cushion large boxed or packaged articles during warehousing and shipping. Conventional corner posts are made of paperboard covered on one side with adhesive, wound onto a mandrel having a substantially circular cross-section, and then—before the adhesive sets—formed on a forming tool into a desired shape, typically one having a modified “L” shaped cross section. The dried finished corner posts are inserted into the corners of a package between the package and the article.
The use of corner posts placed vertically inside a package between the package and the product increases resistance to axial forces and allows packaged products to be stacked. However, as warehouse-stacking heights have increased, the likelihood that the corner posts will buckle under the increased axial compression forces, thereby allowing the package to crush, has also increased. Thus there is a need for a corner post having greater resistance to axial compression forces.
The use of corner posts also increases resistance to lateral (side) impact forces and forces caused by clamp handling and basiloid handling. It is not uncommon to use a clamp truck to move packaged appliances in a block three units high, three units across and two units deep. Such clamp handling can impart lateral forces on the packaged products of up to 2,500 PSI. Existing corner posts do not always provide sufficient protection against such large lateral forces. Thus there is a need for a corner post having greater resistance to lateral compression forces.
Various means have been considered for increasing the resistance of wound paperboard corner posts to axial and lateral forces, including increasing the thickness of each paperboard ply, increasing the number of plies, and increasing the ply strength. However, these proposed solutions can increase costs, slow down production, and make it more difficult to form posts into the desired shapes. Also, these solutions do not always result in a corner post having the desired resistance to axial compression or lateral forces due to the innate tendency of corner posts to buckle because of the high ratio of length to cross-section diameter and the relatively large span of long, flat vertical areas in the structure.
Thus it is an object of the present invention to provide a corner post having increased resistance to axial compression and lateral forces.
Another object of the present invention is to provide corner posts having different performance characteristics but the same outer post design.
Yet another object is to provide a compression resistant corner post that is less costly and easier to make than corner posts having more or thicker plies.
Further objects will appear from the description, accompanying drawings, and appended claims.
The present invention is a reinforced corner post assembly for cushioning and protecting a packaged article from axial and lateral forces. In one embodiment the assembly comprises a conventional corner post having an outer wall and an inner wall joined at opposing ends to form a hollow tube and one or more reinforcing tubes disposed longitudinally within the hollow interior of the corner post.
The corner post is manufactured from a single sheet of material that is wetted with adhesive, wound into a tube, formed and dried. The reinforcing tubes may be inserted into the hollow interior of the corner post during or after manufacture of the corner post.
Preferably, the reinforcing tubes are spiral paperboard tubes having circular cross sections having a diameter that enables the tubes to fit snugly within the hollow interior of the corner post. Typically, the length of the tubes and the corner post is the same. The tubes are held in place by forces applied by the interior surfaces of the outer and inner walls and/or may be affixed to the outer and inner walls by adhesive or other means. Beads formed in the walls of the corner post may also help hold the reinforcing tubes in place. The reinforcing tubes may be marked according to their physical characteristics and selected “off the shelf” at the point of use.
In another embodiment, the reinforcing tubes are disposed within longitudinal grooves integrally formed in the walls of the corner post. Each groove has opposing sides extending from the wall along opposing edges. The distance between the edges is less that the outer diameter of the reinforcing tubes in order to secure the tubes within the grooves.
In still another embodiment, the reinforcing tubes are held within longitudinal slots integrally formed in the walls of the corner post during manufacture.
Turning to the drawings, there is shown in
The corner post 2 generally comprises an outer wall 3 (i.e., the wall adjacent the package when the corner post is installed) and an inner wall 4 (i.e., the wall adjacent the packaged article). The outer and inner walls meet at rounded distal ends 5 and 6 to define the hollow tube. The outer wall typically includes integrally formed beads or grooves 7 for added stiffness and resistance. The corner post 2 normally extends upward from a base pad located beneath the product to a top cap or lid, and is wedged between the product and the package to provide lateral cushioning of the product and axial support of the product packaging.
The corner post 12 of
The longer leg 24 has a bead 28 formed in its outer wall 16 and a second bead 30 formed in its inner wall 18. The beads 28, 30 are slightly offset from each other but are adjacent. The shorter leg 26 has a bead 32 formed in its outer wall 16 that extends inward toward the inner wall 18. The beads (28, 30 and 32) help hold the reinforcing tubes 14 in place.
The reinforcing tubes 14 preferably are relatively small diameter spiral paperboard tubes having a circular cross-section, although other cross-sectional shapes are within the scope of the invention, such as triangular, square or rectangular. In this first embodiment, the reinforcing tubes 14 are inserted into the hollow interior spaces of both legs 24, 26 of the L-shaped corner post 12. One spiral tube 14 is disposed within the longer leg 24 and two spiral tubes 14 are disposed within the shorter leg 26. The reinforcing tubes 14 are collinear with the longitudinal corner post 12. That is, the axis of the tubes 14 is parallel to the longitudinal axis of the corner post 12, thus providing improved resistance to axial (vertical) compression forces.
The reinforcing tubes 14 may be inserted into the hollow interior spaces during or after manufacture of the corner post 12. For example, during manufacture of the corner post 12, the tubes 14 may be inserted while the corner post 12 is still wet from the adhesive. Upon drying, the corner post 12 may shrink slightly in the horizontal plane (“tighten up”), causing the reinforcing tubes 14 to be captured and held tightly in place within the corner post 12 by frictional and/or lateral forces applied by the interior surfaces of the inner and outer walls 16, 18. The reinforcing tubes may also be adhered to the interior surfaces of the inner and outer walls 16, 18 by adhesive, two-sided tape, staples, clips, or any other suitable means of attachment.
Although the embodiment shown in
The corner post assembly of the present invention need not be configured exactly as shown in
The reinforcing tubes can be spiral wound (preferred) or convolutely wound. Although wound paper and paperboard is preferred, the reinforcing tubes can be made of any suitable material, including molded plastic.
For ease of use, the reinforcing tubes can be labeled, color coded, or otherwise marked to indicate cost and/or performance characteristics. The tubes can then be selected “off the shelf” based on the desired cost and performance characteristics.
The distance from one edge 47 to the opposite edge 47 should be less than the outer diameter of the reinforcing tube 46 in order to hold the reinforcing tube 44 within the groove. Where the groove 46 is substantially circular in cross-section, the groove 46 defines an arc of more than 180 degrees. The reinforcing tube 44 may be inserted telescopically into one end of the groove or snapped into place by forcing the tube 44 through the gap between opposing edges 47.
The slotted corner post 62 is formed by wrapping paper or paperboard around a mandrel having integral grooves where the slots 65 are to be located. After the wrapping step, the paperboard is scored along the grooves and the layers of paperboard are pushed into the grooves. The reinforcing tubes 64 are then inserted into the grooves and are captured by one or more additional layers of paperboard. Upon drying, the slots 65 tighten around the tubes 64 to hold them in place.
Although
Sidewall (lateral) compression tests were performed on convolutely wound paperboard L-shaped corner posts having one leg shorter than the other (similar to the corner post shown in
Additional sidewall compression tests were performed on L-shaped corner posts with and without a reinforcing tube inserted into the longer leg. At 500 lbs. lateral compression force, the average sidewall displacement was about 1.35 inches without the reinforcing tubes, but only about 1.0 inch with the reinforcing tubes. The test results indicate that the addition of reinforcing tubes to an L-shaped corner post significantly increases the resistance of the corner post to lateral compression forces.
Other modifications and alternative embodiments of the invention are contemplated which do not depart from the scope of the invention as defined by the foregoing teachings and appended claims. It is intended that the claims cover all such modifications that fall within their scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
304790 | Butz | Sep 1884 | A |
1446239 | Yumura | Feb 1923 | A |
3244347 | Jenk | Apr 1966 | A |
3337111 | Patriekis et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3536245 | Palmer | Oct 1970 | A |
3648920 | Stump | Mar 1972 | A |
3854579 | Scharre | Dec 1974 | A |
3935357 | Padovani | Jan 1976 | A |
4482054 | Gardner | Nov 1984 | A |
4483444 | Gardner | Nov 1984 | A |
4771893 | Liebel | Sep 1988 | A |
4795666 | Okada et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5175041 | Webb et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5267651 | Hughes | Dec 1993 | A |
5275677 | Morley | Jan 1994 | A |
5450703 | Fuhrman et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5471809 | Frankel | Dec 1995 | A |
5593039 | Ortlieb | Jan 1997 | A |
6059104 | Widman | May 2000 | A |
6186329 | Qiu | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6234314 | Qiu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247596 | Muyskens | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6286683 | Hunt et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6467756 | Elsasser | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6513662 | Stebelton | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520336 | Baechle | Feb 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
7276543 | Oct 1995 | JP |
11059733 | Mar 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030111383 A1 | Jun 2003 | US |