The subject matter disclosed herein relates to containers, particularly to packing containers, and more particularly to packing containers suitably configured for stacking one on top of another.
Packing containers are often formed from a corrugated sheet product material that is cut with a die to form a flat blank, or scored and slotted to form a knock down (KD). The flat blank or KD is folded into a three dimensional container that may be secured using an arrangement of flaps, adhesive liquids, adhesive tapes, or mechanical fasteners.
In use, packing containers may be subjected to considerable forces during shipping, storage and stacking. It is desirable to increase the strength and rigidity of packing containers, particularly with respect to stacking, while reducing the amount of materials used to form the packing containers.
This background information is provided to reveal information believed by the applicant to be of possible relevance to the present invention. No admission is necessarily intended, nor should be construed, that any of the preceding information constitutes prior art against the present invention.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a container includes a plurality of panels integrally arranged with respect to each other and with respect to a set of orthogonal x, y and z axes, the z-axis defining a direction line in which the container is configured to support a stacking load. The plurality of panels include a first panel having a first planar surface, and a second panel having a second planar surface, wherein the first panel and the second panel form a contiguity with a fold line disposed therebetween, and wherein the first planar surface is disposed parallel to the x-z plane or the y-z plane. The container further includes a compression reinforcement feature having a planar edge oriented orthogonal to the first planar surface and perpendicular to the z-axis, the planar edge being disposed a distance away from the fold line but at a distance no greater than half a thickness of the first panel, the first panel having a void between the fold line and the planar edge.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a container includes a plurality of panels having a first side panel, a second side panel, a first end panel, and second end panel, a top panel and a bottom panel, the plurality of panels being integrally arranged with respect to each other to form a box having four lateral sides configured to support a stacking load when exerted in a z-direction from the top panel toward the bottom panel. The first side panel and a first portion of the top panel form a contiguity with a first fold line disposed therebetween. The second side panel and a second portion of the top panel form a contiguity with a second fold line disposed therebetween. A first compression reinforcement feature is disposed proximate the first fold line and proximate the first end panel. A second compression reinforcement feature is disposed proximate the first fold line and proximate the second end panel. A third compression reinforcement feature is disposed proximate the second fold line and proximate the first end panel. A fourth compression reinforcement feature is disposed proximate the second fold line and proximate the second end panel. Each of the first and second compression reinforcement features have a planar edge oriented orthogonal to the first side panel and perpendicular to the z-direction, each respective planar edge being disposed a distance away from the first fold line but at a distance no greater than half a thickness of the first panel, the first panel having a void between the first fold line and each respective planar edge. Each of the third and fourth compression reinforcement features have a planar edge oriented orthogonal to the second side panel and perpendicular to the z-direction, each respective planar edge being disposed a distance away from the second fold line but at a distance no greater than half a thickness of the second panel, the second panel having a void between the second fold line and each respective planar edge.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a container includes a plurality of panels integrally arranged with respect to each other and with respect to a set of orthogonal x, y and z axes, the z-axis defining a direction line in which the container is configured to support a stacking load. The plurality of panels include a first panel having a first planar surface, and a second panel having a second planar surface, wherein the first panel and the second panel form a contiguity with a fold line disposed therebetween, wherein the first planar surface is disposed parallel to the x-z plane or the y-z plane, and wherein the second panel is disposed orthogonal to the first panel. The container also includes a compression reinforcement feature having a planar edge oriented orthogonal to the first planar surface and perpendicular to the z-axis, the compression reinforcement feature includes a tab that extends from and is coplanar with the first panel and that terminates at the planar edge, the planar edge being disposed a distance away from a planar outer surface of the second panel but at a distance no greater than half a thickness of the first panel. The plurality of panels further comprises a third panel adhered to the outer surface of the second panel proximate the tab.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a container includes a plurality of panels having a first side panel, a second side panel, a first end panel, and second end panel, a top panel and a bottom panel, the plurality of panels being integrally arranged with respect to each other to form a box having four lateral sides configured to support a stacking load when exerted in a z-direction from the top panel toward the bottom panel. The first side panel and a first portion of the top panel form a contiguity with a first fold line disposed therebetween. The first side panel and a first portion of the bottom panel form a contiguity with a second fold line disposed therebetween. A first compression reinforcement feature is disposed proximate the first fold line and proximate the first end panel. A second compression reinforcement feature is disposed proximate the first fold line and proximate the second end panel. A third compression reinforcement feature is disposed proximate the second fold line and proximate the first end panel. A fourth compression reinforcement feature is disposed proximate the second fold line and proximate the second end panel. Each of the first and second compression reinforcement features have a planar edge oriented orthogonal to the first side panel and perpendicular to the z-direction, each of the first and second compression reinforcement features include a tab that extends from and is coplanar with the first side panel and that terminates at a respective planar edge, each respective planar edge being disposed a distance away from an outer surface of the top panel but at a distance no greater than half a thickness of the first panel. Each of the third and fourth compression reinforcement features have a planar edge oriented orthogonal to the first side panel and perpendicular to the z-direction, each respective planar edge of the third and fourth compression reinforcement features being disposed a distance away from the second fold line but at a distance no greater than half a thickness of the first side panel, the first side panel includes a void between the second fold line and each respective planar edge of the third and fourth compression reinforcement features.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a flat blank includes a first panel and a second panel that form a contiguity with a fold line disposed therebetween. The flat blank also includes a compression reinforcement feature formed by a cut line that begins at a first point on the second panel, traverses a first distance along a first line that extends across the fold line, traverses a second distance along a second line that runs substantially parallel to the fold line, and traverses a third distance along a third line that extends back across the fold line to end at a second point on the second panel, wherein the second line defines a location of a planar edge of the compression reinforcement feature, and wherein the planar edge is disposed a distance away from the fold line but at a distance no greater than half a thickness of the first panel.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a flat blank includes a first panel and a second panel that form a contiguity with a fold line disposed therebetween. The flat blank also includes a compression reinforcement feature formed by a cut line that begins at a first point on the first panel, traverses a first distance along a first line that extends across the fold line, traverses a second distance along a second line that runs substantially parallel to the fold line, and traverses a third distance along a third line that extends back across the fold line to end at a second point on the first panel, wherein the second line defines a location of a planar edge of the compression reinforcement feature, and wherein the planar edge is disposed a distance away from the fold line but at a distance no greater than a full thickness of the first panel.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a container includes a first panel comprising a planar surface, a second panel comprising a planar surface, wherein the first panel and the second panel form a contiguity with a fold line disposed therebetween, and a tabular region extending from the first panel, the tabular region arranged proximate to the fold line and coplanar with the planar surface of the first panel.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a container includes a bottom panel, a top panel opposing the bottom panel, a first side panel, a second side panel opposing the first side panel, a front panel, a rear panel opposing the front panel, and a first tabular region extending from the first side panel arranged coplanar with a planar surface of the first side panel.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a flat blank includes a first panel comprising a planar surface, a second panel comprising a planar surface, wherein the first panel and the second panel form a contiguity with a fold line disposed therebetween, and a tabular region defined by a cut line in the first panel.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a container includes a first panel comprising a planar surface, a second panel comprising a planar surface, wherein the first panel and the second panel form a contiguity with a fold line disposed therebetween, and a cut-out region of the second panel, the cut-out region partially defined by the fold line, a exposed edge of the first panel, the exposed edge partially defined by the cut-out region.
Another embodiment of the invention includes a container having a plurality of panels with a defined thickness integrally arranged with respect to each other and with respect to a set of orthogonal x, y and z axes, the z-axis defining a direction line in which the container is configured to support a stacking load. The plurality of panels include a first panel having a first planar surface, and a second panel having a second planar surface, wherein the second panel is disposed adjacent the first panel, wherein the first panel and the second panel form a contiguity with a fold line disposed therebetween, wherein the first planar surface is disposed parallel to the x-z plane or the y-z plane, wherein the fold line has at least one cutout region having a first dimension that extends along the fold line and a second dimension that extends across the fold line from the first planar surface to the second planar surface, and wherein the at least one cutout region has a first planar edge oriented perpendicular to the first planar surface and perpendicular to the z-axis. The plurality of panels further include a third panel having a third planar surface disposed parallel with the first planar surface, wherein the third panel has an outer edge having at least one projection that is contiguous and planar with the third planar surface, and wherein the at least one projection has a second planar edge oriented perpendicular to the third planar surface and perpendicular to the z-axis. The at least one projection is disposed within a respective one of the at least one cutout region.
Another embodiment of the invention includes a container having a plurality of panels with a defined thickness integrally arranged with respect to each other and with respect to a set of orthogonal x, y and z axes, the z-axis defining a direction line in which the container is configured to support a stacking load. The plurality of panels is folded to define a form having a plurality of folded edges oriented perpendicular to the z-axis. At least one of the plurality of folded edges has a cutout region having a planar edge oriented perpendicular to the z-axis. The plurality of panels includes a plurality of cut edges oriented and disposed inline with respective ones of the plurality of folded edges. At least one of the plurality of cut edges has a projection disposed contiguous and planar with a respective panel of the plurality of panels. The projection includes a planar edge oriented perpendicular to the z-axis, the planar edge being disposed within an adjacently disposed cutout region.
These and other advantages and features will become more apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the drawings.
The subject matter, which is regarded as the invention, is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying non-limiting drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in which:
The detailed description explains embodiments of the invention, together with advantages and features, by way of example with reference to the drawings.
Although the following detailed description contains many specifics for the purposes of illustration, anyone of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that many variations and alterations to the following details are within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the following embodiments of the invention are set forth without any loss of generality to, and without imposing limitations upon, the claimed invention.
A packing container, also referred to as a carton or simply as a container, may be fabricated by, for example, cutting or scoring a sheet product with a die or other type of cutting or scoring tool, such as cutting, scoring and slotting tooling and equipment, to form a flat sheet having various panels, flaps, tabs, recesses and creases. The sheet may be folded and secured using, for example, adhesive liquids, tapes or mechanical means such as staples or straps to form a three dimensional packing container. Packing containers may be formed from a variety of sheet products. The term “sheet products” as used herein is inclusive of natural and/or synthetic cloth or paper sheets. Sheet products may include both woven and non-woven articles. There are a wide variety of nonwoven processes and they can be either wetlaid or drylaid. Some examples include hydroentangled (sometimes called spunlace), DRC (double re-creped), airlaid, spunbond, carded, and meltblown sheet products. Further, sheet products may contain fibrous cellulosic materials that may be derived from natural sources, such as wood pulp fibers, as well as other fibrous material characterized by having hydroxyl groups attached to the polymer backbone. These include glass fibers and synthetic fibers modified with hydroxyl groups. Sheet product for packing containers may also include corrugated fiber board, which may be made from a variety of different flute configurations, such as A-flute, B-flute, C-flute, E-flute, F-flute, or microflute, for example.
In use, a packing container may be subjected to various forces during handling, shipping and stacking of the packing container including, for example, compressive forces exerted between the top and bottom panels of the container. It is desirable for a packing container to withstand the various forces to protect objects in the container and to maintain a presentable appearance following shipping. It is also desirable to reduce the amount of materials used to form the packing container while maintaining design specifications for strength and rigidity.
In an embodiment of a container having one or more symmetrical panels oriented parallel with the x-y plane (discussed below) it has been found, with respect to the symmetrical panel, that a compression reinforcement feature formed by removal or displacement of a small amount of container sidewall material below an upper fold line (or above a lower fold line) on a length-wise side panel of the container can improve stacking strength (also herein referred to as compression strength) of the associated container, while in an embodiment of a container having one or more asymmetrical panels oriented parallel with the x-y plane (also discussed below) it has been found, with respect to the asymmetrical panel, that a compression reinforcement feature formed by extending a small amount of container sidewall material, such as in the form of a tab, above an upper fold line (or below a lower fold line) on a length-wise side panel on an edge proximate a folded over lap joint, can improve stacking strength of the associated container. Such findings are based on substantial experimentation, both design of experiments experimentation and empirical experimentation, involving many parameters, where some of the parameters were found to be statistically significant, while other ones of the parameters were found to be statistically insignificant.
As used herein, reference to side panels and end panels, also referred to in combination as lateral panels, is in reference to those panels oriented orthogonal to the x-y plane (see
As used herein, the terms orthogonal (perpendicular) and parallel should be interpreted as being substantially orthogonal (perpendicular) and substantially parallel, respectively. For example, the term orthogonal in relation to planar surfaces should be interpreted to include two planar surfaces having an angle therebetween from 85-degrees to 95-degrees, or more typically from 88-degrees to 92-degrees, depending on whether the measurement is taken when the container is in a non-compressed state or a compressed state. And the term parallel in relation to planar surfaces should be interpreted to include two planar surfaces having an angle therebetween from +5-degrees to −5-degrees, or more typically from +2-degrees to −2-degrees, depending on whether the measurement is taken when the container is in a non-compressed state or a compressed state.
As used herein, any reference to a dimension or a percentage value should not be construed to be the exact dimension or percentage value stated, but instead should be understood to mean a dimension or percentage value that is “about” the stated dimension or percentage value, except where it is clear from the description and usage as presented herein.
The number of CRFs 1114, the arrangement of the CRFs 1114, and the dimensions of the CRFs 1114 have been found to improve the compression strength of the container 100 depending on the dimensions of a particular container and the materials used to fabricate the container. Thus, the illustrated embodiments of
With respect to symmetrical and asymmetrical panels, and with reference to
While
As mentioned above,
Folding the sheet product to form the edges 103 and 105 compresses the corrugated sheet between the opposing liner boards which may, for example, result in buckling, sagging, or shearing when an excessive compressive force is applied in a direction along the lines 150, that is, along a direction line parallel to the z-axis. The CRFs 1114 remain coplanar with the respective side panels 102 and 104, and are not folded or creased when the container 100 is assembled. More particularly, the cut line 1020 forming each CRF 1114 is not deformed when the container 100 is folded. Thus, the corrugated sheet material in the CRFs 1114 remains unfolded and may withstand greater compressive forces than the adjacent folded edges 103 and 105. As such, it will be appreciated that the recesses 1050 form the compression reinforcement features (CRFs) 1114 on the container 100. Similarly, folding the sheet product to form edge 123 also compresses the corrugated sheet. However, CRFs 214 remain coplanar with the side panel 104. Thus, the corrugated sheet material in the CRFs 214 remains unfolded and may likewise withstand greater compressive forces than the adjacent folded edge 123. As such, it will be appreciated that the tabs 214 form the compression reinforcement features (CRFs) 214 on the container 100.
Experimental testing of the container 100, where side panels 102 and 104 are different dimensions, using a box compression test (BCT) has shown an improvement in BCT results up to 11% over similar containers that did not include the tabs 214.
The testing results varied depending on the arrangement and number of tabs. In this regard, a control container having no tabs was found to have a BCT of 384±9 lbs. A first test container having two tabs similar to the tabs 214 depicted in
With reference to
With reference to
Comparing
While embodiments have been described herein having particular characteristic dimensions such as “d”, “e”, and “½e”, for example, it will be appreciated that respective tabs of CRFs 214 need not all be the same height relative to the fold line 123, and that respective recesses 1050 of CRFs 1114 need not be all the same height relative to the fold line 103.
Referring now to
With reference now to
As a side note, when referring to the height of the tabs of CRFs 214 discussed above, reference may be made herein to a positive dimension, such as + 3/32 of an inch, to indicate the presence of side panel material forming the tab, and when referring to the distance d of recess 1050, reference may be made herein to a negative dimension, such as − 3/32 of an inch, to indicate the absence of side panel material forming the recess.
With reference to
In another embodiment, and with reference to
In another embodiment, and with reference to
While
Referring to
With reference to
In the embodiment of
As discussed above, CRFs 214, 1114 may be located on upper and/or lower edges (relative to the z-axis depicted in
In an embodiment, and with reference to
In an embodiment, compression reinforcement features 1114a, b, c, d, e, f, g, and h, are arranged in pairs along respective edges of container 1100 as illustrated in
While reference is made herein to a container 100, 1100 having certain overall dimensions, it will be appreciated that such noted dimensions are merely to establish an order of magnitude and not to be construed as being exact. For example, a container formed in accordance with an embodiment of the invention may fall anywhere within the dimensional window having a minimum envelope size defined by a 5-inch cube, and a maximum envelope size defined by a 50-inch cube, where the container may or may not be a cube.
In view of the foregoing, it will be appreciated that an embodiment of the invention includes a container 100, 1100 having a plurality of panels that includes a first side panel, a second side panel, a first end panel, and second end panel, a top panel and a bottom panel, the plurality of panels being integrally arranged with respect to each other to form a box having four lateral sides and configured to support a stacking load when exerted in a z-direction from the top panel toward the bottom panel. Wherein the first side panel and a first portion of the top panel form a contiguity with a first fold line disposed therebetween. Wherein the second side panel and a second portion of the top panel form a contiguity with a second fold line disposed therebetween. Wherein a first compression reinforcement feature is disposed proximate the first fold line and proximate the first end panel. Wherein a second compression reinforcement feature disposed proximate the first fold line and proximate the second end panel. Wherein a third compression reinforcement feature disposed proximate the second fold line and proximate the first end panel. Wherein a fourth compression reinforcement feature disposed proximate the second fold line and proximate the second end panel. Wherein each of the first and second compression reinforcement features have a planar edge oriented orthogonal to the first side panel and perpendicular to the z-direction, each respective planar edge being disposed a distance away from the first fold line but at a distance no greater than half a thickness of the first panel, the first panel having a void between the first fold line and each respective planar edge. Wherein each of the third and fourth compression reinforcement features have a planar edge oriented orthogonal to the second side panel and perpendicular to the z-direction, each respective planar edge being disposed a distance away from the second fold line but at a distance no greater than half a thickness of the second panel, the second panel having a void between the second fold line and each respective planar edge.
Through substantial experimentation, discussed further below, it has be found that CRF's 214 (tabs) are advantageous on such a container as depicted in
It will be appreciated that a compression strength of a container could be dependent upon many variables associated with the container, such as a length, a width, a height of the container, the material forming the container, the type of fluting of fluted material forming the container, and the thickness of material forming the container, for example. Also, and in the case of the container having one or more of the aforementioned compression reinforcement features, the compression strength of the container could be dependent upon a length of the compression reinforcement feature, placement of the compression reinforcement feature, a height dimension (plus or minus) of the compression reinforcement feature, and a quantity of the compression reinforcement features. Through the use of exhaustive design of experiment (DOE) modeling, the following has been found.
With reference now to
With reference now to
With reference now to
Referring to Table-1 as an example, a container 1100 having a CRF 1114 as discussed above disposed on a length-wise edge 1103 of the container 1100 (see Column-1 parameter labeled “Tab Height-Length Panel [−½ caliper]”), has a DOE BCT result that is +29.397971 pounds stronger than the normalized intercept value. However, it is not only the scaled estimates that are of interest, but also the probability of statistical significance that is presented in Column-4, which in this example has a value of 0.0015. For DOE's it is accepted practice that if a level of significance for an estimated parameter is equal to or greater than 95% probability, then the results of that parameter is considered to be statistically significant. With respect to Column-4, equal to or greater than 95% probability equates to a “Prob>|t|” value of equal to or less than 0.05. As such, the subject CRF 1114 with a ½ caliper recess has a probability of being statistically significant in improving the compression strength of the container 1100.
By referring to Tables-1, 2 and 3 in combination, several parameters show up as being statistically significant in improving the compression strength of a container. However, for a given container size one of the aforementioned parameters consistently shows up as being statistically significant, which is the parameter in each Column-1 labeled “Tab Height-Length Panel [−½ caliper]”. This parameter correlates with the CRF 1114 discussed above in connection with
It is noteworthy, however, to also consider parameters that appear to have statistical significance in one or more, but not all, of Tables-1, 2 and 3. For example, the parameter labeled “Corner Space [At corner]” has equal to or greater than 95% probability of being advantageously statistically significant in Tables-1 and 3, and the parameter labeled “Tab Length [20%]” has equal to or greater than 95% probability of being advantageously statistically significant in Table-3.
The parameter labeled “Corner Space [At corner]” refers to a CRF 214, 1114 that is located closer to a corner of the container than to a center region of the container, and the parameter labeled “Tab Length [20%]” refers to a CRF 214, 1114 having a length that is 20% of the length of the edge of the container on which it is located, both of which will now be discussed further with reference back to
With reference to
A first set of test results showed that the RSC 1100 had improved compression strength when the centers of the CRFs were placed a distance of 3.5 inches from the end of the container, versus being placed substantially at the end of the container, and versus being placed 5.5 inches from the end of the container. However, all three placements showed an improvement in compression strength over a baseline RSC 1100 having no CRFs at all, the most advantageous placement (centerline at 3.5 inches from container end) had an improvement of 11%.
A second set of test results showed that the RSC 1100 had improved compression strength when the length of the CRFs were 20-30% of the edge length of the RSC (on a lengthwise side of the RSC), versus being 10% or 40%. However, all four lengths showed an improvement in compression strength over a baseline RSC 1100 having no CRFs at all. While the most advantageous length was 30%, having an improvement over the baseline RSC of 12.5%, an 11.2% improvement was found for a 20% length, a 4.4% improvement for a 10% length, and a 3.6% improvement for a 40% length.
From all of the foregoing substantive DOE's and empirical tests, it was found that two types of CRFs 214 (tabs) and 1114 (recesses) can be advantageous in improving the compressive strength of a respective container 100 and 1100, when strategically used and placed as disclosed herein.
For a container 100, such as an overlapped container as depicted in
For either the container 100 or the container 1100, respective CRFs 214, 1114 having a length of 10-30% of the length of the container have been found to be advantageous, and respective CRFs 214, 1114 having a respective centerline located at a distance from the end of the container that is between 25-40% of the length of the container have been found to be advantageous.
For the container 100, placing CRFs 214 only on one edge, the edge proximate the glued overlap as depicted in
Notwithstanding the foregoing, reference is now made to an embodiment of the invention depicted in
In addition to the foregoing description relating to
Reference is now made to
In a first embodiment in relation to
In the first embodiment, and with reference to
In a second embodiment in relation to
In the second embodiment, and with reference to
With reference to
In a third embodiment in relation to
In the third embodiment, and with reference to
With reference to
In an embodiment, projections 3290, 3292, 3300, 3310, 3320, 3330 extend outward from a respective outer edge 3288, 3298, 3308, 3318, 3328 no more than the thickness of the material of the flat blank 3200.
With reference to each of the first, second and third embodiments described above, panel 3210 may be secured to panel 3218 via a glue strip, an adhesive liquid, an adhesive tape, or mechanical fasteners. Also, the plurality of panels 3228 may be formed from a flat blank of corrugated material having a defined direction of corrugation as indicated by line 3340, where each planar edge of the outermost cut edges 3291, 3293, 3301, 3311, 3321, 3331 are oriented perpendicular to the direction of corrugation 3340. In the first embodiment described above, the fold line 3240 is oriented perpendicular to the direction of corrugation 3340, while in the second and third embodiments described above, the respective fold lines 3248, 3232 are oriented parallel with the direction of corrugation 3340.
With reference to the first embodiment described above, the plurality of panels 3228 includes a fourth panel 3214 and a fifth panel 3216, where the fourth panel 3214 has a fourth planar surface oriented parallel with the first planar surface of the first panel 3210. The second panel 3212, the fourth panel 3214, the fifth panel 3216 and the third panel 3218 form a contiguity with a second fold line 3242, a third fold line 3244 and a fourth fold line 3246 disposed therebetween. In an embodiment, at least one of the second fold line 3242, third fold line 3244 and fourth fold line 3246 has one or more respective cutout regions 3272, 3274, 3276, 3278, 3280, 3282, where each cutout region extends along the respective fold line in a first direction and across the respective fold line in a second direction, and where each cutout region has a planar edge oriented perpendicular to the fourth planar surface of the fourth panel 3214, parallel with the fifth planar surface of the fifth panel 3216 and perpendicular to the z-axis, similar to the arrangement discussed above in connection with cutout regions 3262, 3268.
With reference to the second and third embodiments described above, a similar arrangement for the fourth and fifth panels 3214, 3216 is depicted in
In view of the foregoing description of container 3100, and with consideration being given to the container 3100 not being limited to just a wrap-around style container, it will be appreciated that an embodiment of the invention can alternatively described as follows.
In an embodiment, container 3100 includes a plurality of panels 3228 having a defined thickness integrally arranged with respect to each other and with respect to a set of orthogonal x, y and z axes, the z-axis defining a direction line in which the container 3100 is configured to support a stacking load. The plurality of panels 3228 are folded with respect to each other to define a form having a plurality of folded edges 3232, 3240, 3248 oriented perpendicular to the z-axis, where at least one of the plurality of folded edges has a cutout region 3260, 3262, 3264, 3266, 3268, 3270 having a planar edge, similar to planar edges 3284, 3294 depicted in
While certain combinations of panels 3202, 3204, 3206, 3208, 3210, 3212, 3214, 3216, 3218, 3220, 3222, 3224, 3226, fold lines 3232, 3234, 3236, 3238, 3240, 3242, 3244, 3246, 3248, 3250, 3252, 3254, cutout regions 3260, 3262, 3264, 3266, 3268, 3270, 3272, 3274, 3276, 3278, 3280, 3282, and projections 3290, 3292, 3300, 3310, 3320, 3330, have been described herein, it will be appreciated that these certain combinations are for illustration purposes only and that any combination of any of the foregoing panels, fold lines, cutout regions, and projections may be employed in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. For example, cutout regions 3260 and/or 3262 along with projections 3290 and/or 3293, may be employed with or without any other herein described cutout region or projection, and cutout regions 3264, 3266, 3268 and/or 3270 along with projections 3310, 3330, 3300 and/or 3320, may be employed with or without any other cutout region or projection herein described in connection with
Relative to a container 3100 having no cutout regions or projections as herein described, that is, absent any cutout regions on fold lines with planar cut edges of projections nested therein, empirical data has shown that an embodiment of container 3100 having only cutout regions 3260, 3262, 3264, 3266, 3268, 3270 with projections 3290, 3292, 3310, 3330, 3300, 3320 respectively nested therein, has an increased BCT strength of about 5.5%, and when cutout regions 3272, 3274, 3276, 3278, 3280, 3282 are additionally included, empirical data has shown that the same embodiment of container 3100 has an increased BCT strength of about 20.5%. Additionally, and also relative to a container 3100 having no cutout regions or projections as herein described, empirical data has shown that an embodiment of container 3100 having only cutout regions 3272, 3274, 3276, 3278, 3280, 3282, with no projections nested therein, has an increased BCT strength of about 6.5%. Accordingly, and while not being held to any particular theory, empirical data has shown that combining cutout regions 3260, 3262, 3264, 3266, 3268, 3270 and projections 3290, 3292, 3310, 3330, 3300, 3320 with cutout regions 3272, 3274, 3276, 3278, 3280, 3282, a synergistic effect results, that is, the combined BCT strength increase is greater than the sum of the separate BCT strength increases. The above-noted empirical data is based on a wrap-around style container 3100 similar to that depicted in
While certain combinations of features relating to a container, or flat blank for a container, have been described herein, it will be appreciated that these certain combinations are for illustration purposes only and that any combination of any of these features may be employed, explicitly or equivalently, either individually or in combination with any other of the features disclosed herein, in any combination, and all in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Any and all such combinations are contemplated herein and are considered within the scope of the invention disclosed.
While the invention has been described in detail in connection with only a limited number of embodiments, it should be readily understood that the invention is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Rather, the invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, while various embodiments of the invention have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the invention may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description, but is only limited by the scope of the appended claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed example embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited. Moreover, and unless otherwise stated, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another. Furthermore, and unless otherwise stated, the use of the terms a, an, etc. do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.
This application is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/224,734, filed Sep. 2, 2011, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/379,808, filed Sep. 3, 2010, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
272327 | Rogers | Feb 1883 | A |
981993 | Gair et al. | Jan 1911 | A |
1892594 | Stone | Dec 1932 | A |
2082365 | Straw et al. | Jun 1937 | A |
2114052 | Kincade, Jr. | Apr 1938 | A |
2300492 | Fischer | Nov 1942 | A |
2346488 | Hoffmaster et al. | Apr 1944 | A |
2367717 | Stevens | Apr 1951 | A |
2547892 | Stevens | Apr 1951 | A |
2811296 | Long | Oct 1957 | A |
2839236 | Dunning | Jun 1958 | A |
2857090 | Fallert | Oct 1958 | A |
2887389 | Linville | May 1959 | A |
2962202 | Hansen | Nov 1960 | A |
3017064 | Davis | Jan 1962 | A |
3100072 | Mason | Aug 1963 | A |
3163344 | Tunick | Dec 1964 | A |
3164316 | Wurster et al. | Jan 1965 | A |
3202339 | Franklin, Jr. | Aug 1965 | A |
3206099 | Fanter et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
3217924 | Chidsey, Jr. | Nov 1965 | A |
3265285 | Fanter | Aug 1966 | A |
3309005 | Pilger | Mar 1967 | A |
3353740 | Outwater | Nov 1967 | A |
3375967 | Robinson | Apr 1968 | A |
3447735 | Whitney | Jun 1969 | A |
3481527 | Jacke | Dec 1969 | A |
3552633 | Ketler | Jan 1971 | A |
3688972 | Mahon | Sep 1972 | A |
3698548 | Stenzel et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3744705 | Kuhn et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3747801 | Graser | Jul 1973 | A |
3826421 | Morse et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3883067 | McGlynn | May 1975 | A |
3899123 | Stollberg et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3963170 | Wood | Jun 1976 | A |
4029207 | Gordon | Jun 1977 | A |
4042166 | Selin et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4056223 | Williams | Nov 1977 | A |
4084693 | Culpepper | Apr 1978 | A |
4093116 | Watkins et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4256226 | Stone | Mar 1981 | A |
4267959 | Gilbert | May 1981 | A |
4283001 | Meyers | Aug 1981 | A |
4572423 | Spencer | Feb 1986 | A |
4644586 | Padgett | Feb 1987 | A |
4702407 | Lisiecki | Oct 1987 | A |
4771939 | Wilkins | Sep 1988 | A |
4850527 | Church et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5002224 | Muise | Mar 1991 | A |
5085367 | Carstens | Feb 1992 | A |
5117973 | LoDuca | Jun 1992 | A |
D337270 | Brockman | Jul 1993 | S |
5323957 | Roosa | Jun 1994 | A |
5335844 | Young | Aug 1994 | A |
5392985 | Smith et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5400955 | Coalier et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5427242 | Oliff et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5450998 | Esse et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5474232 | Ljungstrom et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5535941 | Garza | Jul 1996 | A |
5662508 | Smith | Sep 1997 | A |
5671883 | Philips | Sep 1997 | A |
5690601 | Cummings et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5755377 | Durand | May 1998 | A |
5772110 | Garretson | Jun 1998 | A |
5839650 | Sheffer | Nov 1998 | A |
5918801 | Milio | Jul 1999 | A |
5950912 | Economopoulos | Sep 1999 | A |
5957294 | Kanter | Sep 1999 | A |
6098874 | Tokarski | Aug 2000 | A |
6132349 | Yokoyama | Oct 2000 | A |
6247593 | Ruble et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6640975 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6660368 | Cooley | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6834793 | Sutherland | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6866186 | Fogle et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6935504 | Ritter et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7124890 | McLeod et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7201714 | Zoeckler et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7261231 | Kuhn et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7628311 | Kuhn et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7673787 | Mittelstaedt | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7766219 | Gomes et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8690047 | McKenna et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20020008134 | Southwell | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030168452 | Prutkin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030234285 | Bates et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050189405 | Gomes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050236466 | McLeod | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050279815 | Fogle et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060196920 | Moen | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070000986 | McClure | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070063005 | Gomes et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070138244 | England | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152027 | Hyatt et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20090095799 | Garner | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121003 | Garner | May 2009 | A1 |
20090121006 | Gasior | May 2009 | A1 |
20090286663 | Little et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100219232 | Smith | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100264049 | Maillot | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110204127 | Brundage et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110204131 | Brundage et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110281705 | Aganovic et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120000973 | McLeod | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120055922 | Askan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120061456 | Rosas et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130048704 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20140174977 | McKenna et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20160068298 | Westney et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199400362 | May 1995 | CL |
199501348 | Jun 1996 | CL |
199501794 | Sep 1996 | CL |
200001067 | Jun 2001 | CL |
1281342 | Oct 1968 | DE |
3222017 | Dec 1983 | DE |
468860 | Jan 1992 | EP |
1284481 | Feb 1962 | FR |
2270678 | Mar 1994 | GB |
2419345 | Apr 2006 | GB |
2436830 | Oct 2007 | GB |
20-1998-0067913 | Dec 1988 | KR |
20-2008-0006523 | Dec 2008 | KR |
10-2010-0052013 | May 2010 | KR |
9301699 | May 1995 | NL |
9303967 | Mar 1993 | WO |
0068098 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0166423 | Sep 2001 | WO |
2006026767 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006095097 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2010128874 | Nov 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/010587 dated May 14, 2014. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for PCT/US2011/050347 dated Mar. 19, 2012. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report for 11822726.3, dated Jun. 2, 2015, six pages, Munich, Germany. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 17159609.1-1708 dated Mar. 31, 2017; Report Received Dec. 5, 2017, which is related to U.S. Appl. No. 13/737,659; 1-9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130126594 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61379808 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13224734 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 13737659 | US |