1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a reinforced pallet.
2. Background Art
Pallets are subject to many types of loads and forces. Many of these loads and forces are illustrated by pallet racking scenarios and line load scenarios. The line load is the weight of a unit load concentrated along a narrow area across the full length or width of the pallet. The rack load is the load carrying capacity and deflection of a pallet which is supported by a rack frame near the ends of the pallet stringers.
Today, the use of plastic pallets is becoming more common. While reinforced plastic pallets presently exist, most do not provide sufficient reinforcement for racking loads and line loads. For example, a non-continuous, multiple piece cross-reinforcement may do little to support racking loads.
Some reinforced pallets today may attempt to handle various load types, such as line loads and racking loads, but are ultimately not size efficient or cost efficient. In other words, these pallets may not provide the end user with the desired strength and load bearing properties for the desired pallet package height. For example, in certain reinforced plastic pallets, the deck in which the reinforcement is located may be significantly larger than its unreinforced counterparts. In such a reinforced deck, the reinforcements may overlap in different planes, resulting in a larger deck height, and an overall larger pallet height.
Moreover, many reinforced pallets have reinforcement which is exposed. This is a particularly undesirable feature in the case where the reinforcement is made from fiberglass or other fiber material, which may eventually delaminate and cause the pallet to have less durability and a shorter pallet life.
Pallets formed of molded plastic material have distinct advantages over those made of wood or metal. While wood pallets have sufficient stiffness, they are heavy; are subject to warpage, splintering and splitting; are nonuniform in strength; and gain significant weight when wet. Metallic pallets typically are expensive and, in the case of steel, heavy and subject to corrosion. Plastic pallets are stronger, lighter and more durable than wooden pallets. Traditionally, fire retardance as it relates to plastic pallets has not been recognized as an issue. However, recently, plastic pallets have been the subject of standards promulgated by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL), Factory Mutual Research Company (FMRC), and National Association of Fire Marshals.
Some standards allow for plastic pallets to be used the same as wood pallets when experimental data show equivalency in the burning and suppression characteristics between the plastic and wood pallets. Unfortunately, some material presently used to help promote fire retardance in plastic pallets, such as an engineered resin blend of high-impact polystyrene and polyphenylene oxide, is very expensive and thus not cost efficient to mold an entire pallet from this material. Such material may also not be as injection-molding friendly as other polymeric materials.
Accordingly, a reinforced plastic pallet is desired which is capable of handling the various loads to which a pallet may be subjected, including both line loads and racking loads. The pallets should have a package height comparable to an unreinforced pallet. The pallet and reinforcement should also be durable, provide for improved pallet life, and should be cost efficient. Moreover, a pallet is desired which is accepted by the fire community as having burn and suppression properties substantially similar or better than wood, is relatively inexpensive, lightweight, and easy to manufacture.
It is an object according to the present invention to provide a plastic pallet which is capable of accommodating both line loading and rack loading.
It is another object according to the present invention to provide a plastic pallet with reinforcement for providing improved strength and load supporting properties.
It is another object according to the present invention to provide a reinforced pallet which has is size efficient or which has a package height comparable to other plastic pallets.
It is yet another object according to the present invention to provide a reinforced pallet with improved durability and cost efficiency.
In carrying out the above objects according to the present invention, provided is a reinforced pallet assembly having a first pallet deck and a second pallet deck. Each of the decks has an outer member and an intermediate member, each outer member and intermediate member having a one of a pair of mating cross-rib surfaces which are mounted together to define box-beam sections within each pallet deck. Also included is a reinforcement member which is disposed between the outer member and the intermediate member of the second pallet deck for providing stiffness thereto. Further included is a plurality of columns which extend between the intermediate members. The first and second pallet decks and columns may a plastic material and the at least one reinforcement member may comprise a metal material. Also, the columns include a first column portion projecting from the first intermediate portion, and a second column portion projecting from the second intermediate portion and attached to the first column portion. The second pallet deck may be defined by a unitary construction comprising a plurality of peripheral rail members and at least one cross-rail extending between a pair of peripheral rail members. The reinforcement member may be disposed within the cross-rail or within the peripheral rail members of the second pallet deck. The second pallet deck includes a channel within which the reinforcement member is disposed.
The first pallet deck further may include a second reinforcement member disposed between the first outer member and the first intermediate member which is oriented generally perpendicular to the reinforcement member. The first pallet deck may include a second reinforcement member disposed therein extending substantially along its central axis.
Also provided according to the present invention is a pallet assembly which has a first pallet member having a first pallet surface including a first set of cross-rib members. A second pallet member is disposed adjacent the first pallet member and has a second pallet surface including a second set of cross-rib members corresponding to the first set. The first and second sets of cross-rib members are secured together to form a first pallet deck. The second pallet member also includes a mating surface opposite the second pallet surface. Also included is a first reinforcement member which is disposed between the first and second pallet members along a first axis thereof. A third pallet member is disposed adjacent the second pallet member and has a third pallet surface including a third set of cross-rib members. The third pallet member has an other mating surface opposite the third pallet surface. A fourth pallet member is disposed adjacent the third pallet member and has a fourth pallet surface including a fourth set of cross-rib members corresponding to the third set. The third and fourth sets are secured together to form a second pallet deck. A second reinforcement member is disposed between the third and fourth pallet members along a second axis thereof oriented substantially perpendicular to the first reinforcement member. A column portion extends between the third and fourth members.
Also provided according to this invention is a reinforced pallet having a top deck and a bottom deck and columns. The top deck has an upper surface, a lower surface, and a plurality of upper box beam sections between the upper and lower surfaces. The bottom deck has an upper surface, a lower surface, and a plurality of lower box beam sections between the upper and surfaces. The bottom deck further includes at least one elongate reinforcement member disposed therein, and a plurality of columns extending between and attached to the top deck and bottom deck.
The above objects and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
a is an exploded view of
a is an exploded view of
a is an exploded view of
a is an exploded view of
a is an exploded view of
b is an exploded view of
a is an exploded view of
a is an exploded view of
a, b and c, are alternate exploded views of the fifth embodiment; and
As best illustrated in
With reference to
As best shown in
Bottom deck 14 also preferably, but not necessarily, includes a plurality of peripheral elongate reinforcement members 52, 54, 56, 58 extending along the peripheral rails of bottom deck 14 for enhancing the strength, torsion, bending, and stiffness properties of pallet 10. Reinforcement members 30-38 of bottom deck 14 are particularly directed to providing reinforcement in the rack load and line load scenarios to which pallet 10 may be subjected. They are shown disposed in a generally planar orientation between mid-bottom member 34 and bottom member 36, such that the insert is sandwiched between adjacent mating surfaces 44 and 46, respectively. For example, as illustrated in
Bottom member 36 has a pattern defined by ribs and cross-ribs, the pattern defining a corresponding recess or channel 78 into which reinforcement members 50-58 are received, such that when positioned, the reinforcement member(s) has a height similar to that of the surrounding ribbed structure, and the rib structure and the insert member are co-planar with surface 46. Accordingly, the reinforcements in bottom deck 14 do not increase the package height of this deck.
As illustrated in
Accordingly, top deck reinforcement member 60 is disposed in the cross-member of top deck 12 which is oriented in a plane parallel to but along an axis perpendicular to the reinforced cross-member 50 of bottom deck 14. This orientation of reinforcement members in separate decks is more cost efficient than other embodiments, and will also satisfy the desired strength, line and rack loading strength, and bending characteristics.
Reinforcement members 50-58 may be formed of metal, such as stamped steel, aluminum, or may also be formed of a composite or structural plastic, such as a carbon-filled or glass-filled composite, or pultrusion. Of course, it is contemplated that there are numerous other materials which may provide the desired strength and loading properties and characteristics of pallet 10.
After reinforcement members are positioned on the desired rails, bottom and mid-bottom members 36, 38 are securely attached to each other. If attached by a welding process, mating ribbed surfaces 41, 43 of members 36,38 are heated to a point of plasticizing the plastic surfaces, and then are introduced to each other and held together for a period of time by which a welded bond will form between the surfaces. In those areas, the attachment of intermediate bottom member 34 to bottom member 36 (i.e. welding, etc.) takes place between the mating ribs of those areas not covered by reinforcement member 50 as well as the mating flanged edges of members 34,36. Deck portions 32, 34 of top deck 12 are similarly attached.
A third embodiment of according to the present invention is illustrated in
In accordance with the teachings according to the present invention, such unitary cross-member 266 is preferable to a multi-piece, non-continuous, co-planar cross reinforcements within a single deck, and also to reinforcement members on parallel planes within a single deck, both of which may not provide the desired racking load strength and/or package height.
Adding a separate reinforcement cross-portion across the remaining reinforcement cross member would require at least a portion (in the central region where they cross) of the reinforcement members to lie in separate planes. Thus, a center reinforcement which crosses may not be feasible.
A fourth embodiment according to the present invention is shown in
A pallet assembly according to the present invention is illustrated in
While pallet assembly 410 may be used in the same environments as other pallets disclosed herein, it is particularly well-suited to a pallet assembly which seeks to enhance the properties of its individual components, and doing so in a cost efficient manner when feasible. For example, due to their positioning within pallet 410, column members 428 are subject to repeated impact by fork lift tines. Thus, in a preferred embodiment, columns 428 may be molded from a plastic material or composite that provides high impact resistance. Upper and lower decks 412, 414 on the other hand may not require a high impact resistant material, but instead may be formed of a material that has relatively high friction coefficient, high stiffness, high fire retardant characteristics (one which improves the burning and suppression characteristics) properties of the pallet.
With regard to the burn and suppression characteristics of a pallet, the present invention teaches that the horizontal surfaces of a pallet (i.e. the decks), and particularly the underside of the decks, have a greater exposure to flame during burn as flames are traveling upwards, and thus have a relatively greater influence on the pallet burn rate than the vertical surfaces of a pallet (i.e. the columns). Accordingly, for a pallet seeking to incorporate fire retardant material into its design in an effective and cost efficient manner, it is unexpectedly taught herein that the entire pallet does not need to be formed of fire retardant material, but instead selected components may be formed thereof. One embodiment according to the present invention teaches that the horizontal portions of the pallet have a predetermine level of fire retardance, while the vertical portions have minimal or no fire retardance, and in any event less than the horizontal portions. Thus, in keeping with these teachings, the decks 412, 414 (the horizontal surfaces) of pallet 410 are formed of a polymeric material having a fire retardant properties, typically by including a fire retardant resin or additive to a plastic carrier, thereby defining a predetermined level of flame retardance. On the other hand, the columns 428 (the vertical surfaces) may be formed separately from a high impact material or other type of polymer material which also has little or no flame retardance, and thus has a predetermined level of flame retardant which is less than decks 412, 414.
More particularly, for one deck pallets and two deck pallets, the present invention further teaches that the upper horizontal portion of a pallet (i.e. the top deck components) has the greatest affect on the burn rate of a pallet than the other portions of the pallet. Accordingly, in keeping with the teachings according to the present invention, top deck 412 of pallet 410 is formed of a plastic material having a predetermined level of flame retardance, while the columns 428 and lower horizontal surfaces (the bottom deck 414) may be formed separately from a high impact material or other type of polymer material which has little or no flame retardant material, and in any event has less than top deck 412. In such an embodiment, the columns may be integrally formed with the bottom deck of the same material (
In a pallet having multiple deck portions, the present invention further teaches that the horizontal lower portion of each deck has a greater affect on the burn and suppression rate of a pallet than the other deck portions and column portions. Thus, in a preferred embodiment, mid-top portion 432 and bottom portion 436 of pallet 410 are formed of a plastic material each having a predetermined level of flame retardance which is higher than that of the remaining components of the pallet. Again, the remaining components may be little or no fire retardance properties.
Even more particularly for pallets having multiple deck portions, in a more preferred embodiment, it is taught herein that the horizontal lower portion of the top deck has the greatest affect on the burn rate of a pallet and therefore requires a higher level of fire suppression than the other pallet components. Accordingly, mid-top portion 432 has a predetermined level of flame retardance which is higher than that of the remaining components of the pallet. In such an embodiment, the columns may be integrally formed with the mid-bottom deck portion of the same material (
As in previous embodiments, pallet assembly 410 also includes reinforcement members therein. Bottom deck 414 includes a cross-reinforcement member 450 and peripheral reinforcement members 452, 454, 456, 458. Top deck 412 includes a cross-reinforcement member 460 which lies in a plane parallel to but along an axis perpendicular to that of reinforcement member 450.
Joining the pallet components to each other may be performed by means known to those in the art. For example, the columns may be press fit into the decks, or may be snapped together into the decks by a snap attachment (one type is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,006,677). The parts may also be welded via a welding for dissimilar materials.
Thus, this pallet embodiment allows only those desired components to be formed from an fire retardant material, such that the pallet may have the desired fire retardant, and burn and suppression characteristics. This pallet also allows the manufacturer the freedom to selectively control and allocate the material and/or amount of fire retardant additive in each component. Accordingly, this provides a lower cost pallet, since the entire pallet no longer needs to be formed of a single material, particularly a more costly single fire retardant material. Accordingly, the desired fire retardant levels for each pallet component and for the overall pallet may be achieved for obtaining desired pallet burn and suppression characteristics in a cost efficient manner, so that the pallet disclosed herein may meet the industry specifications, such as those outlined by, and including but not limited to, NFPA 13, FMRC 4995, and UL 2335, incorporated herein by reference. Thus, the fire retardant additives may be adjusted such that the pallet as a whole meets the desired guidelines. Particularly, the burn and suppression characteristics should be substantially equivalent or better than a similarly sized wood pallet, such as one made from hard wood. Accordingly, the pallet should have a fire rating and burn rate no higher than wood. The particular materials used may be those known in the art for producing fire retardant characteristics in pallets, including but not limited to commodity items, such as polymer resins like polyolefins having a halogen based flame retardant resin additive.
Of course, as illustrated herein, these teachings are applicable to pallets of any size, design, and to those manufactured by various processes. By way of example and not limitation, the teachings herein may also apply to reinforced pallets (
While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of application U.S. Ser. No. 10/040,099, filed on Oct. 19, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,955,128.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1770614 | Hennessy | Jul 1930 | A |
3580190 | Fowler | May 1971 | A |
3699901 | Cook, III | Oct 1972 | A |
5117762 | Shuert | Jun 1992 | A |
5413052 | Breezer et al. | May 1995 | A |
5791262 | Knight et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5868080 | Wyler et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5894803 | Kuga | Apr 1999 | A |
6125770 | Brandenburg | Oct 2000 | A |
6199488 | Favaron et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6357366 | Frankenberg | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6446563 | Ohanesian | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6748876 | Preisler et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6955128 | Apps | Oct 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060032414 A1 | Feb 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10040099 | Oct 2001 | US |
Child | 11252478 | US |