Reinforced polyamide composites

Abstract

A reinforced polyamide composites comprising polyamide resin, 1 to 60 weight percent fiber and/or talc, and 0.1 to 5 phr (part per hundred by resin) interfacial modifier, based on the weight of the polyamide composites; wherein the interfacial modifier are functional organic compounds of structural formula:R.sub.1 (CO.sub.2 H)x;R.sub.1 (CO).sub.2 NH; andR.sub.1 (CO).sub.2 O,whereR.sub.1, R.sub.2, R.sub.3 may be aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbyl group; the number of carbon atoms in R.sub.1, R.sub.2 and R.sub.3 is in the range of 2 to 16, preferably 2 to 12; and x=1 to 4.The interfacial modifier can be mixed with glass and/or talc and polyamide simultaneously and compounded directly; or, premix the interfacial modifier and polyamide, melt the premix, then incorporate glass fiber and/or talc and compound to form the reinforced polyamide composites. The physical properties of the instant composites can be improved significantly.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Reinforced polyamide resin has a large market share of reinforced engineering thermoplastics. To obtain good physical properties is the goal of research regarding the fiber and/or filler reinforced plastics. The first consideration for optimizing physical properties of fiber reinforced plastics is the stable adhesive strength between fiber and resin; on the other hand, the resin matrix must be able to prevent breaking of fiber caused by stress attacking. Accordingly, in order to prevent loss of physical properties of the composites and improve the adhesive strength between fiber and resin, a usual method comprises treating fiber with primer and coupling agent during preparation of fiber as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,231,910, 3,981,851 and 3,644,245. The literature, for example, 40th Annual Conference, Reinforced Plastics/Composite Institute, SPI, Inc. 1985, section 21-A, describes an evaluation test of the effect of different treating methods of fiber on the physical properties of fiber reinforced polyamide under with the object of improving the physical properties of the fiber reinforced polyamide composites. Improving adhesive strength between fiber and polyamide resin through treatment of fiber is the most efficient way for the fiber manufacturer to improve these physical properties. Notwithstanding, this way is not the only such method for the compounder of engineering plastics.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The instant invention provides a method comprising addition of interfacial modifier during compounding, which leads to enhanced adhesive strength between fiber and/or filler and polyamide resin and thereby raises the physical properties of reinforced polyamide engineering plastics.

The instant invention relates to a reinforced polyamide composites comprising polyamide resin, 1 to 60 weight percent fiber or talc, and 0.1 to 5 phr interfacial modifier, preferably 0.3 to 1 phr, based on the weight of the polyamide composites.

The polyamide resin of the reinforced polyamide composites of the instant invention comprises polymer of general formula

--(--R--CO--NH--R'--NH--CO--)--.sub.n where R and R' may be identical or different alkylene groups; in particular, polyamide-6 prepared through condensation polymerization of hexamethylene diamine and adipic acid.

The fiber used in the reinforced polyamide composites of the instant invention comprise any type of commercial glass fiber suitable for polyamide; the amount of the fiber in the composites may be 1 to 60, preferably, 10 to 50 weight percent based on the weight of the composites.

The material used for reinforcing the polyamide may comprise filler, such as talc, silica, barium sulfate and other filler; in particular, talc; the amount of reinforcing filler in the compositions of the instant invention may be in the range of 1 to 60, preferably, 5 to 40 weight percent based on the weight of the composites.

The reinforced polyamide composites of the instant invention comprise also the polyamide composites reinforced with fiber and filler simultaneously; the amount of fiber and filler together in the composites may be in the range of 1 to 60 weight percent based on the weight of the composites.

The interfacial modifiers used for improving the reinforced polyamide composites comprise compounds of structural formulae

R.sub.1 (CO.sub.2 H)x; R.sub.1 (CO).sub.2 NH; and R.sub.1 (CO).sub.2 O, where R.sub.1, R.sub.2, R.sub.3 may be aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbyl group; the number of carbons in R.sub.1, R.sub.2 and R.sub.3 is in the range of 2 to 16, preferably 2 to 12; and x=1, 2, 3 or 4. When x is 2, R, may be an aliphatic and/or aromatic C.sub.2 to C.sub.12 group. More particularly, R.sub.2 may be a C.sub.2 -C.sub.8 aliphatic and/or aromatic group, and R.sub.3 may be a C.sub.2 -C.sub.6 aliphatic and/or aromatic group.

The invention further relates to a process for preparing reinforced polyamide composites by dry mixing fiber and/or talc, polyamide resin, interfacial modifier and/or additives, and feeding together and compounding in an extruder to obtain the composites. This process may also be carried out by premixing polyamide with interfacial modifer, feeding the premix by first feeding into the extruder after melting the polyamide and then feeding fiber and/or talc and/or other additives into the extruder and compounding to obtain the composites.

The reinforced polyamide composites of the instant invention will be illustrated with the following examples, which show the improving effect of the interfacial modifier of the instant invention on the physical properties of the reinforced polyamide composites; nevertheless, the instant invention are not limited by these examples.

EXAMPLES

Comparative Examples 1 to 3 and Examples 1 to 3

Table 1 lists formulations of composites in comparative examples 1 to 3 which do not contain interfacial modifier and corresponding examples 1 to 3 which, on the other hand, contain interfacial modifier as indicated in the Table; among which, comparative example 1, 2 and 3 are to be compared with examples 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In the process used in examples 1 to 3, the interfacial modifier were premixed with polyamide, and dry blended with glass fiber, feeded and compounded in an extruder at temperature of 220.degree. to 330.degree. C.; then, dried and injection molded into test specimens which were tested for physical properties in accordance with ASTM test standard. The results are listed in Table 1 also, which show the enhancement of the flexural strength obtained in examples 1, 2 and 3 over those obtained in comparative examples 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

Comparative Examples 4 to 6 and Examples 4 to 6

Table 2 lists formulations of composites of comparative examples 4 to 6 which do not contain interfacial modifier and Examples 4 to 6 which contain interfacial modifier as indicated in the Table.

The process used herein is the same as described in examples 1 to 3, except that polyamide-6 was replaced by polyamide-6,6; among which, comparative examples 4, 5, and 6 are to be compared with examples 4, 5, and 6, respectively. The results obtained were listed in Table 2 also; again, which show the enhancement of the flexural strength obtained in examples 4, 5, and 6 over those obtained in comparative examples 4, 5, and 6, respectively, for different glass fiber produced by several makers.

Comparative Example 7 and Examples 7 to 9

Table 3 lists formulations of composites of comparative example 7 and examples 7 to 9, wherein the effects of various interfacial modifier were evaluated. The process used herein comprises mixing interfacial modifier with polyamide, dry blending with glass fiber, compounding in an extruder at temperature 220.degree.-300.degree. C. and after properly dried, injection molded into test specimen which were tested for flexural strength in accordance with Standard Methods of ASTM. The results listed in Table 3 reveal obviously the enhancing effect of the interfacial modifier of the instant invention on the physical properties of the reinforced polyamide composites.

Comparative Examples 8 to 9 and Examples 10 to 12

Table 4 lists formulations of composites of comparative examples 8 to 9 and examples 10 to 12, wherein effect were evaluated for process comprising separate feeding stages of resin containing various types of interfacial modifier and glass fiber. That means processes used in examples 10 to 12 comprise mixing interfacial modifier with polyamide, feeding into one feeding entry of extruder to melt the polyamide, then, feed glass fiber via another feeding entry to compound the molten polyamide into compositens. Among which, example 10 is to be compared with comparative example 8, while examples 11 and 12 are to be compared with comparative example 9. The results shown in Table 4 were obtained in a same manner as described above.

Comparative Examples 10 to 11 and Examples 13 to 14

Table 5 lists formulations of composites of comparative examples 10 to 11 and examples 13 to 14, wherein, effects of interfacial modifier for different types and amounts of glass fiber were evaluated. Among which, Examples 13, and 14 are to be compared with comparative examples 10, and 11, respectively. Process in Examples 13 and 14 comprise mixing interfacial modifier with polyamide, dry blending the resulting mixture with glass fiber and compounding in an extruder. The strengths were tested as described above and the results were listed in Table 5 also.

Comparative Examples 12 to 13 and Examples 15 to 16

Table 6 lists the formulations of composites of comparative examples 12 to 13 and examples 15 to 16, wherein, effects of interfacial modifier for glass fiber of different specification were evaluated. Among which, examples 15 and 16 are to be compared with comparative examples 12 and 13, respectively.

Processes used in comparative example 12 and example 15 comprise dry blending polyamide, glass fiber and interfacial modifier, and feeding via first feeding entry of extruder; while processes used in comparative example 13 and example 16 comprise premixing polyamide with interfacial modifier, feeding via first feeding entry of the extruder, melting the polyamide, then, feeding glass fiber via second feeding entry to compound the mix. The strengths were tested as described above and the results obtained were listed in Table 6 also. It can be seen that the interfacial modifier is always effective in spite of the different feeding methods.

Comparative Example 14 and Example 17

Table 7 lists formulations of composites of comparative example 14 and example 17, wherein effect of interfacial modifier under the existence of processing aid, heat stabilizer, antioxidant and other additives on the strength of the composites was evaluated. Process used herein comprises premixing interfacial modifier with polyamide, feeding the additives stated above together and compounding in an extruder. Strengths were tested as described above and results obtained were listed in Table 7 also.

Comparative Example 15 and Example 18

Table 8 lists formulations of composites of comparative example 15 and example 18, wherein effects of interfacial modifier on talc-reinforced polyamide were evaluated. Process used herein comprises premixing interfacial modifier with polyamide and talc, and feeding into extruder to compound the mix. Strengths were tested as described above and results obtained were listed in Table 8 also. It is apparent that not only the flexural strength of the composite was enhanced, but also the heat distortion temperature was raised after the interfacial modifier was added into the composite.

It is obvious, from the comparative examples and examples, that glass fibers from different suppliers, talc, or different surface treatment on glass fiber, or different feeding manner of glass fiber during compounding, can have somewhat various influence on the physical properties of the reinforced polyamide composites; nevertheless, the interfacial modifiers and the manufacturing process of the instant invention have positively improving effect on the physical properties of the resulted reinforced polyamide composites.

TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________Composition and Comparative Example ExampleCharacteristics 1 2 3 1 2 3__________________________________________________________________________Polyamide-6 100 100 100 100 100 100Glass fiber NitoBo America-PPG America-PPG NitoBo America-PPG America-PPG CS-3J-454S3873540 CS-3J-454S3873540Content of glass 43 43 43 43 43 43fiber (wt %)Interfacial Modifier-(I)R.sub.1 (CO.sub.2 H)x -- -- -- 0.5 0.5 0.5R.sub.1 = aliphatic and/oraromatic groupx = 2No. of Carbons in R.sub.1 = 2-12Flexural Strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 1000 1220 1530 1670 1690 1830__________________________________________________________________________ TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________Composition and Comparative Example ExampleCharacteristics 4 5 6 4 5 6__________________________________________________________________________Polyamide-6/6 100 100 100 100 100 100Glass fiber NitoBo America-PPG Dai-Lai NitoBo America-PPG Dai-Lai(makers and grades) CS-3J-454S3541G-6 CS-3J-454S3541G-6Content of glass 43 43 43 43 43 43fiber (wt %)Interfacial Modifier-(I)R.sub.1 (CO.sub.2 H)x -- -- -- 0.5 0.5 0.5R.sub.1 = aliphatic and/oraromatic groupx = 2No. of Carbons in R.sub.1 = 2-12Flexural Strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 1360 1730 1240 1520 1940 1420__________________________________________________________________________ TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________ ComparativeComposition and Example ExampleCharacteristics 7 7 8 9__________________________________________________________________________Polyamide-6 100 100 100 100Glass fiber NitoBo NitoBo NitoBo NitoBo(makers and grades) CS-3J-454S CS-3J-454S CS-3J-454S CS-3J-454SContent of glass 43 43 43 43fiber (wt %)Interfacial Modifier-(I)R.sub.1 (CO.sub.2 H)x -- 0.5 -- --R.sub.1 = aliphatic and/oraromatic groupx = 2Interfacial Modifier-(II)R.sub.2 (CO).sub.2 NH -- -- 0.5 --R.sub.2 = aliphatic and/oraromatic groupNo. of carbons in R.sub.2 = 4-8Interfacial Modifier-(III)R.sub.3 (CO).sub.2 O -- -- -- 0.5R.sub.3 = aliphatic and/oraromatic groupNo. of carbons in R.sub.3 = 2-6Flexural Strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 1000 1670 1530 1530__________________________________________________________________________Composition and Comparative Example ExampleCharacteristics 8 9 10 11 12__________________________________________________________________________Polyamide-6 100 100 100 100 100Glass fiber NitoBo America-PPG NitoBo America-PPG America-PPG(makers and grades) CS-3J-454S3541 CS-3J-454S35413541Content of glass 43 43 43 43 43fiber (wt %)Interfacial Modifier-(I)R.sub.1 (CO.sub.2 H)x -- -- 0.5 3 --R.sub.1 = aliphatic and/oraromatic groupx = 2No. of carbons in R.sub.1 = 2-12Interfacial Modifier-(III)R.sub.3 (CO).sub.2 O -- -- -- -- 1R.sub.3 = aliphatic and/oraromatic groupNo. of Carbons in R.sub.3 = 2-6Flexural Strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 1460 2560 2420 2710 2700__________________________________________________________________________ TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________Composition and Comparative Example ExampleCharacteristics 8 9 10 11 12__________________________________________________________________________Polyamide-6 100 100 100 100 100Glass fiber NitoBo America-PPG NitoBo America-PPG America-PPG(makers and grades) CS-3J-454S3541 CS-3J-454S35413541Content of glass 43 43 43 43 43fiber (wt %)Interfacial Modifier-(I)R.sub.1 (CO.sub.2 H)x -- -- 0.5 3 --R.sub.1 = aliphatic and/oraromatic groupx = 2No. of carbons in R.sub.1 = 2-12Interfacial Modifier-(III)R.sub.3 (CO).sub.2 O -- -- -- -- 1R.sub.3 = aliphatic and/oraromatic groupNo. of carbons in R.sub.3 = 2-6Flexural Strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 1460 2560 2420 2710 2700__________________________________________________________________________ TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________Composition and Comparative Example ExampleCharacteristics 10 11 13 14__________________________________________________________________________Polyamide-6 100 100 100 100Glass fiber NitoBo NitoBo NitoBo NitoBo(makers and grades) CS-3J-454S CS-3J-454S CS-3J-454S CS-3J-454SContent of glass 15 43 15 43fiber (wt %)Interfacial Modifier-(I)R.sub.1 (CO.sub.2 H)x -- -- 0.5 0.5R.sub.1 = aliphatic and/oraromatic groupx = 2No. of carbons in R.sub.1 = 2-12Flexural Strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 900 1000 1170 1670__________________________________________________________________________ TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________Composition and Comparative Example ExampleCharacteristics 12 13 15 16__________________________________________________________________________Polyamide-6 100 100 100 100Glass fiber America-PPG America-PPG America-PPG America-PPG(makers and grades)3540354135403541Content of glass 43 43 43 43fiber (wt %)Interfacial Modifier-(I)R.sub.1 (CO.sub.2 H)x -- -- 0.5 0.5R.sub.1 = aliphatic and/oraromatic groupx = 2No. of carbons in R.sub.1 = 2-12Flexural Strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 1530 2560 1830 2700Remarks One Stage Two Stages One Stage Two Stages Feeding Feeding Feeding Feeding__________________________________________________________________________ TABLE 7______________________________________ ComparativeComposition and Example ExampleCharacteristics 14 17______________________________________Polyamide-6 100 100Glass fiber NitoBo NitoBo(makers and grades) CS-3J-454S CS-3J-454SContent of glass 43 43fiber (wt %)Processing Aid 0.5 0.5Heat Stabilizer 0.3 0.3Antioxidant 0.3 0.3Interfacial Modifier-(I)R.sub.1 (CO.sub.2 H)x -- 0.5R.sub.1 = aliphatic and/oraromatic groupx = 2No. of carbons in R.sub.1 = 2-12Flexural Strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 1000 1660______________________________________ TABLE 8______________________________________ ComparativeComposition and Example ExampleCharacteristics 15 18______________________________________Polyamide-6 80 80Talc 20 20Interfacial Modifier-(IV)R.sub.3 (CO).sub.2 O -- 0.5R.sub.3 = aliphatic and/oraromatic groupNo. of carbons in R.sub.3 = 2-6H.D.T..sup.1 (264 psi) .degree.C. 134 158Flexural Strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 1330 1370______________________________________ .sup.1 Heat Distortion Temperature

Claims

1. A reinforced polyamide composite consisting of:

(A) polyamide resin,

(B) 1 to 100 phr of at least one of fiber and filler reinforcing agent,

(C) 0.1 to 5 phr of an interfacial modifier, based on the polyamide, wherein the interfacing modifier is selected from the group consisting of C.sub.2 H.sub.2 (CO.sub.2 H).sub.2, C.sub.6 H.sub.6 (CO).sub.2 NH, and C.sub.2 H.sub.2 (CO).sub.2 O, and

(D) at least one processing aid, heat stabilizer, or antioxidant.

2. A composite according to claim 1, wherein the polyamide is nylon-6 or nylon 6/6.

3. A composite according to claim 1, wherein the reinforcing agent is talc.

4. A composite according to claim 3, wherein the amount of talc in the composite is in the range of 1 to 100 phr based on the polyamide.

5. A composite according to claim 4, wherein the amount of talc in the composite is in the range of 10 to 90 phr based on the polyamide.

6. A composite according to claim 1, wherein the reinforcing agent is glass fiber.

7. A composite according to claim 1, wherein the surface of the reinforcing agent is further treated with a coupling agent, said coupling agent containing amino functional groups, epoxy functional groups, or a combination of amino and epoxy functional groups; the amount of said reinforcing agent in said composite is in the range of 1 to 100 phr based on the polyamide.

8. A composite according to claim 7, wherein the amount of the reinforcing agent in the composite is in the range of 10 to 90 phr based on the polyamide.