Reinforced polymer x-ray window

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9305735
  • Patent Number
    9,305,735
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 1, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 5, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
An x-ray window comprising a polymer and carbon nanotubes and/or graphene. The carbon nanotubes and/or graphene can be embedded in the polymer. Multiple layers of polymer, carbon nanotubes, and/or graphene may be used. The polymer with carbon nanotubes and/or graphene can be used as an x-ray window support structure and/or thin film.
Description
BACKGROUND

X-ray windows are used for enclosing an x-ray source or detection device. The window can be used to separate air from a vacuum within the enclosure while allowing passage of x-rays through the window.


X-ray windows can be made of a thin film. It can be desirable to minimize attenuation of the x-rays, especially with low energy x-rays, thus it is desirable that the film is made of a material and thickness that will result in minimal attenuation of the x-rays. Thinner films attenuate x-rays less than thick films, but the film must not be too thin or the film may sag or break. A sagging film can result in cracking of corrosion resistant coatings and a broken film will allow air to enter the enclosure, often destroying the functionality of the device. Thus it is desirable to have a film that is made of a material that will have sufficient strength to avoid breaking or sagging but also as thin as possible for minimizing attenuation of x-rays.


A support structure can be used to support the thin film. Use of a support structure can allow use of a thinner film than could be used without the support structure. For example, a support structure can be made of a plurality of ribs with openings therein. The thin film can be attached to and span the ribs and openings. In order to minimize attenuation of x-rays, it is desirable that the ribs of the structure have a smaller width and height. Wider and higher ribs are typically stronger. Stronger rib materials can provide sufficient strength at a smaller size.


X-ray windows are often used with x-ray detectors. In order to avoid contamination of an x-ray spectra from a sample being measured, it is desirable that x-rays impinging on the x-ray detector are only emitted from the source to be measured. Unfortunately, x-ray windows, including the window support structure and thin film, can also fluoresce and thus emit x-rays that can cause contamination lines in the x-ray spectra. Contamination of the x-ray spectra caused by low atomic number elements is less problematic than contamination caused by higher atomic number elements. It is desirable therefore that the window and support structure be made of a material with as low of an atomic number as possible in order to minimize this noise.


SUMMARY

It has been recognized that it would be advantageous to have an x-ray window that is strong, minimizes attenuation of x-rays, and minimizes x-ray spectra contamination. The present invention is directed to an x-ray window that satisfies the need for an x-ray window that is strong, minimizes attenuation of x-rays, and minimizes x-ray spectra contamination.


In one embodiment, the x-ray window includes a film comprised of a polymer and a high strength material. The high strength material comprises carbon nanotubes and/or graphene. The high strength material reinforces the polymer, thus making a stronger polymer layer. Carbon has a low atomic number (6) and thus is less likely to contaminate an x-ray spectra than an element with a higher atomic number.


In another embodiment, the x-ray window includes a plurality of ribs having openings and a support frame disposed around and connected to a perimeter of the ribs. The ribs and the support frame comprise a high strength material and a polymer. The high strength material comprises carbon nanotubes and/or graphene. The high strength material reinforces the polymer. A thin film is disposed over and spans the plurality of ribs and openings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of an x-ray window film including a high strength material and a polymer in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of an x-ray window composite film including a high strength material embedded in a polymer in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of an x-ray window composite film including a high strength material embedded in a polymer and also additional polymer layers disposed adjacent to the composite film, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of an x-ray window film including carbon nanotubes embedded in a polymer and a majority of the carbon nanotubes are aligned substantially parallel with respect to a surface of the film, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of an x-ray window film including carbon nanotubes embedded in a polymer and a majority of the carbon nanotubes are randomly aligned, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of an x-ray window film including two layers of high strength material and two layers of polymer in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 7 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of two adjacent x-ray window composite films, each including a high strength material embedded in a polymer, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 8 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of an x-ray window including a thin film and a support structure accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 9 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of an x-ray tube including an x-ray window in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 10 is a schematic cross-sectional side view of an x-ray detector including an x-ray window in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 11 is a scanning electron microscope image of a vertically aligned carbon nanotube layer in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 12 is a scanning electron microscope image of a vertically aligned carbon nanotube layer, the carbon nanotubes having a height of about 2.4 μm, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 13 is a scanning electron microscope image of a carbon nanotube layer, after rolling the carbon nanotubes flat, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





DEFINITIONS

As used herein, the term “about” is used to provide flexibility to a numerical range endpoint by providing that a given value may be “a little above” or “a little below” the endpoint.


As used herein, the term “CNT” means carbon nanotubes or carbon nanotube.


As used herein, the term “sccm” means standard cubic centimeters per minute.


As used herein, the term “substantially” refers to the complete or nearly complete extent or degree of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. For example, an object that is “substantially” enclosed would mean that the object is either completely enclosed or nearly completely enclosed. The exact allowable degree of deviation from absolute completeness may in some cases depend on the specific context. However, generally speaking the nearness of completion will be so as to have the same overall result as if absolute and total completion were obtained. The use of “substantially” is equally applicable when used in a negative connotation to refer to the complete or near complete lack of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result.


As used herein, the term “VACNT” means vertically aligned carbon nanotubes.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will be used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Alterations and further modifications of the inventive features illustrated herein, and additional applications of the principles of the inventions as illustrated herein, which would occur to one skilled in the relevant art and having possession of this disclosure, are to be considered within the scope of the invention.


As illustrated in FIG. 1, an x-ray window film 10 is shown comprising a polymer 12 and a high strength material 11. The high strength material 11, in the various embodiments described herein, can comprise carbon nanotubes, graphene, or combinations thereof. The film 10 can have a thickness T1 of between about 50 nm to about 500 nm. Addition of a high strength material 11 to a polymer 12 can provide for a higher strength film 10 than with a polymer alone, thus allowing the film 10 to span greater distances without breaking or sagging.


A high strength material 11 can be an individual layer or may be embedded in the polymer 12 as shown in the x-ray window film 20 of FIG. 2. The film 20 can have a thickness T2 of between about 50 nm to about 500 nm. As illustrated in FIG. 3, an x-ray window film 30 is shown comprising a composite film including a high strength material 11 embedded in a polymer 12 and further comprising polymer layers 32a-b disposed adjacent to the composite film. The film 30 can have a thickness T3 of between about 50 nm to about 500 nm.


The high strength material 11, in the various embodiments described herein, can include carbon nanotubes. As illustrated in FIG. 4, in x-ray window 40 a majority of the carbon nanotubes 41 can be aligned substantially parallel with respect to a surface of the film 42. As described in more detail later, this substantially parallel alignment may be accomplished by rolling the carbon nanotubes 41 flat with use of a roller that is not very much larger in diameter than a height of the carbon nanotubes 41. As illustrated in x-ray window 50 of FIG. 5, a majority of the carbon nanotubes 51 can be randomly aligned. As described in more detail later, this random alignment may be accomplished by rolling the carbon nanotubes 51 flat with use of a roller that is very much larger in diameter than a height of the carbon nanotubes 51 or by spraying the carbon nanotubes onto a surface, such as a polymer.


As illustrated in FIG. 6, x-ray window 60 can include at least two layers of high strength material 11a-b and at least two layers of polymer material 12a-b. In another embodiment, the x-ray window can include at least three layers of high strength material and at least three layers of polymer material. The high strength material layers and polymer layers can alternate. The x-ray window film 60 can have a thickness T6 of between about 50 nm to about 500 nm.


As illustrated in FIG. 7, x-ray window 70 can include at least two layers of high strength material 11c-d and at least two layers of polymer material 12c-d. In another embodiment, the x-ray window can include at least three layers of high strength material and at least three layers of polymer material. As illustrated in FIG. 7, the high strength material 11c-d can be embedded in the polymer 12c-d. The x-ray window film 70 can have a thickness T7 of between about 50 nm to about 500 nm.


In the various embodiments described herein, the polymer can comprise a polyimide. In the various embodiments described herein, the x-ray window film, comprising polymer and high strength material, can be substantially transmissive to x-rays having an energy in the range of 100-20,000 electronvolts; can be capable of withstanding a differential pressure of at least 1 atmosphere; and/or can be capable of withstanding temperatures of greater than 225° C. Materials and thicknesses may be selected to allow the window to withstand a differential pressure of at least 1 atmosphere, thus allowing the window to be used in a device, such as an x-ray detector or x-ray tube, with vacuum on one side, and atmospheric pressure on the other side. Materials may be selected to allow the window to withstand temperatures of greater than 225° C. Sometimes there is a need to subject x-ray windows to higher temperatures, such as in manufacturing, thus it can be valuable to have an x-ray window that can withstand high temperatures.


As illustrated in FIG. 8, x-ray window 80 can include a film 86 supported by a support structure 87. The support structure can comprise a plurality of ribs 83 having openings 84 therein, wherein tops of the ribs 83 terminate substantially in a common plane. The support structure 87 can also include a support frame 85 disposed around a perimeter of the plurality of ribs 83. The film 86 can be disposed over and span the plurality of ribs 83 and openings 84. The support structure 87 can give support to the film 86, thus allowing the film 86 to span larger distances without sagging. In one embodiment, the film 86 comprises a polymer and a high strength material according to the various embodiments described herein. In another embodiment, the support structure 87 comprises a polymer and a high strength material according to the various embodiments described herein, and the film 86 comprises diamond, graphene, diamond-like carbon, carbon nanotubes, polymer, beryllium, or combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the openings take up about 70% to about 95% of a total area within an inner perimeter of the support frame. A larger area for openings can be desirable for minimizing attenuation of x-rays in the support structure 87. In one embodiment, each rib is about less than 100 μm wide w and each rib is between about 30 μm to about 300 μm high h.


As illustrated in FIG. 9, x-ray window embodiments described herein can be mounted on an x-ray tube 90. The x-ray tube can comprise an evacuated cylinder 82, a cathode 83 disposed at one end of the evacuated cylinder; and a window and anode 81 disposed at an opposing end of the cylinder 82.


As illustrated in FIG. 10, x-ray window embodiments described herein can be used for x-ray detection 100. The x-ray window 101 can be attached to a mount 102. The mount 102 can be attached to an x-ray detector 103; and the x-ray window 101 can allow x-rays 104 to impinge upon the detector 103.


How to Make:


Carbon Nanotube Formation:


A carbon nanotube film may be formed by placing a substrate with a layer comprising alumina and a layer comprising iron in an oven at a temperature of greater than 600° C. then flowing ethylene across the substrate thus allowing carbon nanotubes to grow on the substrate. Growth rate can be controlled by the ethylene flow rate and by diluting the ethylene with argon gas. Thickness of the carbon nanotube forest can be controlled by the ethylene flow time. Use of sputtered iron catalyst instead of thermal deposited iron can result in slower carbon nanotube growth.


An Example of One Method of Forming the Carbon Nanotubes:


A silicon wafer was coated with a 30 nm alumina layer. A 6 nm iron layer was then deposited on the alumina layer by PVD sputtering. CNT forest samples were made having thicknesses of around 2 μm, 1 μm, and 500 nm with 1 second ethylene flow with different ethylene flow rates.


Samples were put onto a quartz boat and loaded into a quartz tube of a tube furnace (CNT growth furnace). Argon was switched on to flow into the tube furnace at 50% flow rate (355 sccm) and kept on during the whole growth cycle. After Argon purged the air out of the tube, hydrogen flow was turned on at a 20% flow rate (429 sccm) and the tube furnace was heated up to 750° C.


Ethylene flow was turned on for 1 second for short CNT forest growth at 50% flow rate (604 sccm). Shorter forests were produced with lower ethylene flow rate. Ethylene and hydrogen flow were turned off immediately after the one second growth.


The cover of the tube furnace was opened to accelerate the cooling process. When the temperature was down to 200° C., the samples were taken out from the tube furnace. Argon flow was turned off. This CNT growth cycle was finished.


Combining Carbon Nanotubes with Polymer—Method 1:


The carbon nanotubes can be aligned horizontally, or aligned randomly, by placing a film on top of the carbon nanotubes, rolling the carbon nanotubes flat with a cylindrical roller, then removing the film. For alignment of the carbon nanotubes in substantially a single direction, or in a direction substantially parallel with a surface of the film, the roller should not be very much larger in diameter than a height of the carbon nanotubes. Rollers that are much larger than the diameter of the roller can result in more random alignment of the carbon nanotubes.


For Example of One Method of Rolling the Carbon Nanotubes:


A VACNT forest sample with a size of around 18 mm×18 mm was directly placed on a flat, hard desk surface to avoid substrate cracking. An aluminum foil of about 30 mm×30 mm was placed over and covered the whole nanotube sample surface. Tape was used to cover the edges of the substrate and aluminum foil to avoid substrate shift. A 50 mm×80 mm nitrile sheet of about 0.4 mm in thickness was placed over the aluminum foil and also taped to the desk. A smooth glass tube with 1.57 cm outer diameter was rolled and pressed over the nitrile rubber sheet, aluminum foil, and the CNT sample from different directions for 100 times. The nitrile rubber sheet and the aluminum foil were removed. A thinner and denser CNT film was obtained.


A polymer film can then be applied, such as by placing a polymer film on the carbon nanotubes. The polymer film may be pressed onto the carbon nanotubes in order to embed the carbon nanotubes in the film. Alternatively, a liquid polymer may be poured onto the carbon nanotubes or spun onto the carbon nanotubes, then the polymer can harden by suitable method. The carbon nanotubes can then be released from the substrate, such as by use of hydrofluoric acid.


Combining Carbon Nanotubes with Polymer—Method 2:


Carbon nanotubes may be sprayed onto a polymer film. Alternatively, carbon nanotubes may be sprayed onto a liquid polymer, then the polymer may be cured. A method for spraying carbon nanotubes is described in Chemical Engineering Science, “Insights into the physics of spray coating of SWNT films”, available online 5 Dec. 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference.


In summary of the above method, a suspension of carbon nanotubes may be prepared by an appropriate solvent, such as water with a surfactant, and sonication. The carbon nanotube suspension may then be sprayed onto the appropriate surface. In the present invention, the carbon nanotube suspension can be sprayed onto a polymer. Another polymer layer can be deposited onto the carbon nanotubes, such as by spin coating.


Layer Including Graphene:


A graphene film may be made by flowing methane across a copper surface in an oven at a temperature of greater than 1000° C., thus allowing formation of a graphene layer. The copper may be removed from the graphene layer such as by dissolving the copper in an acid. Liquid polymer may be sprayed on or poured on then cured, such as in an oven, thus forming a composite layer with graphene and polymer.


Other Manufacturing Issues:


The above methods may be combined for making a film with graphene, carbon nanotubes, and polymer. Multiple layers of carbon nanotube and polymer may be stacked together. Multiple layers of graphene and polymer may be stacked together. A layer, or layers, carbon nanotube and polymer may be stacked with a layer, or layers, of graphene and polymer.


A support structure can be made by patterning and etching. The support structure can be made of polymer and a high strength material, or may be made of other material. A film, or layers of films may be placed onto the support structure. The film can comprise diamond, graphene, diamond-like carbon, carbon nanotubes, polymer, beryllium, or combinations thereof. An adhesive may be used to adhere the film to the support structure.


It is to be understood that the above-referenced arrangements are only illustrative of the application for the principles of the present invention. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements can be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. While the present invention has been shown in the drawings and fully described above with particularity and detail in connection with what is presently deemed to be the most practical and preferred embodiment(s) of the invention, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications can be made without departing from the principles and concepts of the invention as set forth herein.

Claims
  • 1. An x-ray window including a film, the film comprising: a) graphene embedded in a polymer;b) the film is substantially transmissive to x-rays having an energy in the range of 100-20,000 electronvolts;c) the film is capable of withstanding a differential pressure of at least 1 atmosphere;d) the film has a thickness of between about 50 nm to about 500 nm;e) the film is attached to a mount; andf) the mount is configured for attachment to an x-ray tube or an x-ray window.
  • 2. The x-ray window of claim 1, further comprising at least one polymer layer disposed adjacent to the film.
  • 3. The x-ray window of claim 1, wherein the film comprises at least two films stacked together, each film including graphene embedded in a polymer.
  • 4. The x-ray window of claim 1: a) further comprising a plurality of ribs having openings therein, wherein tops of the ribs terminate substantially in a common plane, and a support frame disposed around a perimeter of the plurality of ribs;b) wherein the film is disposed over and spans the plurality of ribs and openings to pass radiation therethrough; andc) the ribs comprise carbon nanotubes embedded in a polymer.
  • 5. The x-ray window of claim 1, wherein the polymer comprises a polyimide.
  • 6. The x-ray window of claim 1, wherein the film is capable of withstanding temperatures of greater than 225° C.
  • 7. The x-ray window of claim 1, wherein the film is mounted on an x-ray tube.
  • 8. The x-ray window of claim 1, wherein: a) the mount is attached to an x-ray detector; andb) the film allow x-rays to impinge upon the detector.
  • 9. The x-ray window of claim 1, further comprising: a) another film including carbon nanotubes disposed in a polymer;b) the another film including the carbon nanotubes disposed in the polymer stacked together with the film including graphene embedded in the polymer.
  • 10. An x-ray window comprising: a) a plurality of ribs having openings therein and tops of the ribs terminate substantially in a common plane;b) a support frame disposed around and connected to a perimeter of the plurality of ribs;c) the ribs and support frame comprise carbon nanotubes embedded in a polymer; ande) a thin film disposed over and spanning the plurality of ribs and openings to pass radiation therethrough.
  • 11. The x-ray window of claim 10 wherein the openings take up about 70% to about 95% of a total area within an inner perimeter of the support frame.
  • 12. The x-ray window of claim 10 wherein each rib is about less than 100 μm wide and each rib is between about 30 μm to about 300 μm high.
  • 13. The x-ray window of claim 10 wherein the thin film comprises graphene and polyimide.
  • 14. The x-ray window of claim 13 wherein the graphene is embedded in the polyimide.
  • 15. An x-ray window comprising: a) a composite film comprising carbon nanotubes embedded in a polymer;b) the composite film has a thickness of between about 50 nm to about 500 nm;c) the composite film is substantially transmissive to x-rays having an energy in the range of 100-20,000 electronvolts;d) the composite film is capable of withstanding a differential pressure of at least 1 atmosphere; ande) the composite film is capable of withstanding temperatures of greater than 225° C.
  • 16. The x-ray window of claim 15, wherein the a majority of the carbon nanotubes are randomly aligned.
  • 17. The x-ray window of claim 15, wherein a majority of the carbon nanotubes are aligned substantially parallel with respect to a surface of the film.
  • 18. The x-ray window of claim 15, further comprising: a) a plurality of ribs having openings therein and tops of the ribs terminate substantially in a common plane;b) a support frame disposed around and connected to a perimeter of the plurality of ribs;c) the ribs and support frame comprise carbon nanotubes and a polymer; andd) the composite film disposed over and spanning the plurality of ribs and openings to pass radiation therethrough.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/239,281, filed on Sep. 26, 2008; which claims priority of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/995,881, filed Sep. 28, 2007; and is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/899,750, filed Oct. 7, 2010; which are hereby incorporated by reference. This also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/437,792, filed on Jan. 31, 2011; which is incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (278)
Number Name Date Kind
1276706 Snook et al. May 1918 A
1881448 Forde et al. Oct 1932 A
1946288 Kearsley Feb 1934 A
2291948 Cassen Aug 1942 A
2316214 Atlee et al. Apr 1943 A
2329318 Atlee et al. Sep 1943 A
2340363 Atlee et al. Feb 1944 A
2502070 Atlee et al. Mar 1950 A
2663812 Jamison et al. Mar 1950 A
2683223 Hosemann Jul 1954 A
2952790 Steen Sep 1960 A
3397337 Denholm Aug 1968 A
3358368 Oess Nov 1970 A
3665236 Gaines et al. May 1972 A
3679927 Kirkendall Jul 1972 A
3691417 Gralenski Sep 1972 A
3751701 Gralenski et al. Aug 1973 A
3801847 Dietz Apr 1974 A
3828190 Dahlin et al. Aug 1974 A
3873824 Bean Mar 1975 A
3882339 Rate et al. May 1975 A
3962583 Holland et al. Jun 1976 A
3970884 Golden Jul 1976 A
4007375 Albert Feb 1977 A
4075526 Grubis Feb 1978 A
4126788 Koontz et al. Nov 1978 A
4160311 Ronde et al. Jul 1979 A
4163900 Warren et al. Aug 1979 A
4178509 More et al. Dec 1979 A
4184097 Auge Jan 1980 A
4250127 Warren et al. Feb 1981 A
4293373 Greenwood Oct 1981 A
4368538 McCorkle Jan 1983 A
4393127 Greschner et al. Jul 1983 A
4443293 Mallon et al. Apr 1984 A
4463338 Utner et al. Jul 1984 A
4521902 Peugeot Jun 1985 A
4532150 Endo et al. Jul 1985 A
4573186 Reinhold Feb 1986 A
4576679 White Mar 1986 A
4584056 Perret et al. Apr 1986 A
4591756 Avnery May 1986 A
4608326 Neukermans et al. Aug 1986 A
4645977 Kurokawa et al. Feb 1987 A
4675525 Amingual et al. Jun 1987 A
4679219 Ozaki Jul 1987 A
4688241 Peugeot Aug 1987 A
4696994 Nakajima et al. Sep 1987 A
4705540 Hayes Nov 1987 A
4777642 Ono Oct 1988 A
4797907 Anderton Jan 1989 A
4818806 Kunimune et al. Apr 1989 A
4819260 Haberrecker Apr 1989 A
4837068 Martin et al. Jun 1989 A
4862490 Karnezos et al. Aug 1989 A
4870671 Hershyn Sep 1989 A
4876330 Higashi et al. Oct 1989 A
4878866 Mori et al. Nov 1989 A
4885055 Woodbury et al. Dec 1989 A
4891831 Tanaka et al. Jan 1990 A
4933557 Perkins Jun 1990 A
4939763 Pinneo et al. Jul 1990 A
4957773 Spencer et al. Sep 1990 A
4960486 Perkins et al. Oct 1990 A
4969173 Valkonet Nov 1990 A
4979198 Malcolm et al. Dec 1990 A
4979199 Cueman et al. Dec 1990 A
5010562 Hernandez et al. Apr 1991 A
5055421 Birkle et al. Oct 1991 A
5063324 Grunwald et al. Nov 1991 A
5066300 Isaacson et al. Nov 1991 A
5077771 Skillicorn et al. Dec 1991 A
5077777 Daly Dec 1991 A
5090046 Friel Feb 1992 A
5105456 Rand et al. Apr 1992 A
5117829 Miller et al. Jun 1992 A
5153900 Nomikos et al. Oct 1992 A
5161179 Suzuki et al. Nov 1992 A
5173612 Imai et al. Dec 1992 A
5196283 Ikeda et al. Mar 1993 A
5206534 Birkle et al. Apr 1993 A
5217817 Verspui et al. Jun 1993 A
5226067 Allred et al. Jul 1993 A
RE34421 Parker et al. Oct 1993 E
5258091 Imai et al. Nov 1993 A
5267294 Kuroda et al. Nov 1993 A
5302523 Coffee et al. Apr 1994 A
5343112 Wegmann Aug 1994 A
5391958 Kelly Feb 1995 A
5392042 Pellon Feb 1995 A
5400385 Blake et al. Mar 1995 A
5422926 Smith et al. Jun 1995 A
5428658 Oettinger et al. Jun 1995 A
5432003 Plano et al. Jul 1995 A
5465023 Garner Nov 1995 A
5469429 Yamazaki et al. Nov 1995 A
5469490 Golden et al. Nov 1995 A
5478266 Kelly Dec 1995 A
5521851 Wei et al. May 1996 A
5524133 Neale et al. Jun 1996 A
5561342 Roeder et al. Oct 1996 A
RE35383 Miller et al. Nov 1996 E
5571616 Phillips et al. Nov 1996 A
5578360 Viitanen Nov 1996 A
5602507 Suzuki Feb 1997 A
5607723 Plano et al. Mar 1997 A
5616179 Baldwin et al. Apr 1997 A
5621780 Smith et al. Apr 1997 A
5627871 Wang May 1997 A
5631943 Miles May 1997 A
5673044 Pellon Sep 1997 A
5680433 Jensen Oct 1997 A
5682412 Skillicorn et al. Oct 1997 A
5696808 Lenz Dec 1997 A
5706354 Stroehlein Jan 1998 A
5729583 Tang et al. Mar 1998 A
5774522 Warburton Jun 1998 A
5812632 Schardt et al. Sep 1998 A
5835561 Moorman et al. Nov 1998 A
5870051 Warburton Feb 1999 A
5898754 Gorzen Apr 1999 A
5907595 Sommerer May 1999 A
6002202 Meyer et al. Dec 1999 A
6005918 Harris et al. Dec 1999 A
6044130 Inazura et al. Mar 2000 A
6062931 Chuang et al. May 2000 A
6063629 Knoblauch May 2000 A
6069278 Chuang May 2000 A
6073484 Miller et al. Jun 2000 A
6075839 Treseder Jun 2000 A
6097790 Hasegawa et al. Aug 2000 A
6129901 Moskovits et al. Oct 2000 A
6133401 Jensen Oct 2000 A
6134300 Trebes et al. Oct 2000 A
6184333 Gray Feb 2001 B1
6205200 Boyer et al. Mar 2001 B1
6277318 Bower Aug 2001 B1
6282263 Arndt et al. Aug 2001 B1
6288209 Jensen Sep 2001 B1
6307008 Lee et al. Oct 2001 B1
6320019 Lee et al. Nov 2001 B1
6351520 Inazaru Feb 2002 B1
6385294 Suzuki et al. May 2002 B2
6388359 Duelli et al. May 2002 B1
6438207 Chidester et al. Aug 2002 B1
6447880 Coppens Sep 2002 B1
6477235 Chornenky et al. Nov 2002 B2
6487272 Kutsuzawa Nov 2002 B1
6487273 Takenaka et al. Nov 2002 B1
6494618 Moulton Dec 2002 B1
6546077 Chornenky et al. Apr 2003 B2
6567500 Rother May 2003 B2
6644853 Kantor et al. Nov 2003 B1
6645757 Okandan et al. Nov 2003 B1
6646366 Hell et al. Nov 2003 B2
6658085 Sklebitz Dec 2003 B2
6661876 Turner et al. Dec 2003 B2
6738484 Nakabayashi May 2004 B2
6740874 Doring May 2004 B2
6778633 Loxley et al. Aug 2004 B1
6799075 Chornenky et al. Sep 2004 B1
6803570 Bryson, III et al. Oct 2004 B1
6803571 Mankos et al. Oct 2004 B1
6816573 Hirano et al. Nov 2004 B2
6819741 Chidester Nov 2004 B2
6838297 Iwasaki Jan 2005 B2
6852365 Smart et al. Feb 2005 B2
6866801 Mau et al. Mar 2005 B1
6876724 Zhou Apr 2005 B2
6900580 Dai et al. May 2005 B2
6944268 Shimono Sep 2005 B2
6956706 Brandon Oct 2005 B2
6962782 Livache et al. Nov 2005 B1
6976953 Pelc Dec 2005 B1
6987835 Lovoi Jan 2006 B2
7035379 Turner et al. Apr 2006 B2
7046767 Okada et al. May 2006 B2
7049735 Ohkubo et al. May 2006 B2
7072439 Radley et al. Jul 2006 B2
7075699 Oldham et al. Jul 2006 B2
7085354 Kanagami Aug 2006 B2
7108841 Smally Sep 2006 B2
7130380 Lovoi et al. Oct 2006 B2
7130381 Lovoi et al. Oct 2006 B2
7166910 Minervini Jan 2007 B2
7189430 Ajayan et al. Mar 2007 B2
7203283 Puusaari Apr 2007 B1
7206381 Shimono et al. Apr 2007 B2
7215741 Ukita May 2007 B2
7224769 Turner May 2007 B2
7233071 Furukawa et al. Jun 2007 B2
7233647 Turner et al. Jun 2007 B2
7236568 Dinsmore et al. Jun 2007 B2
7286642 Ishikawa et al. Oct 2007 B2
7305066 Ukita Dec 2007 B2
7358593 Smith et al. Apr 2008 B2
7364794 Ohnishi et al. Apr 2008 B2
7378157 Sakakura et al. May 2008 B2
7382862 Bard et al. Jun 2008 B2
7399794 Harmon et al. Jul 2008 B2
7410603 Noguchi et al. Aug 2008 B2
7428054 Yu et al. Sep 2008 B2
7428298 Bard et al. Sep 2008 B2
7448801 Oettinger et al. Nov 2008 B2
7448802 Oettinger et al. Nov 2008 B2
7486774 Cain Feb 2009 B2
7526068 Dinsmore Apr 2009 B2
7529345 Bard et al. May 2009 B2
7618906 Meilahti Nov 2009 B2
7634052 Grodzins Dec 2009 B2
7649980 Aoki et al. Jan 2010 B2
7650050 Haffner et al. Jan 2010 B2
7657002 Burke et al. Feb 2010 B2
7680652 Giesbrecht et al. Mar 2010 B2
7684545 Damento et al. Mar 2010 B2
7693265 Hauttmann et al. Apr 2010 B2
7709820 Decker et al. May 2010 B2
3741797 Chavasse, Jr. et al. Jun 2010 A1
7737424 Xu et al. Jun 2010 B2
7756251 Davis et al. Jul 2010 B2
8498381 Liddiard et al. Jul 2013 B2
8761344 Reynolds et al. Jun 2014 B2
8774365 Wang Jul 2014 B2
8804910 Wang et al. Aug 2014 B1
8929515 Liddiard Jan 2015 B2
8989354 Davis et al. Mar 2015 B2
20020075999 Rother Jun 2002 A1
20020094064 Zhou Jul 2002 A1
20030096104 Tobita et al. May 2003 A1
20030117770 Montgomery et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030122111 Glatkowski Jul 2003 A1
20030152700 Asmussen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030165418 Ajayan et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040076260 Charles, Jr. et al. Apr 2004 A1
20050018817 Oettinger et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050141669 Shimono et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050157305 Yu et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050207537 Ukita Sep 2005 A1
20060073682 Furukawa et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060098778 Oettinger et al. May 2006 A1
20060233307 Dinsmore Oct 2006 A1
20060269048 Cain Nov 2006 A1
20070025516 Bard et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070087436 Miyawaki et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070111617 Meilahti May 2007 A1
20070133921 Haffner et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142781 Sayre Jun 2007 A1
20070165780 Durst et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070176319 Thostenson et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070183576 Burke et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080181365 Matoba Jul 2008 A1
20080199399 Chen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080296479 Anderson et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080296518 Xu et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080317982 Hecht Dec 2008 A1
20090085426 Davis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090086923 Davis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20100003186 Yoshikawa et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100096595 Prud'Homme et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100126660 O'Hara May 2010 A1
20100140497 Damiano, Jr. et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100239828 Cornaby et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100243895 Xu et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100248343 Aten et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100285271 Davis et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100323419 Aten et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110017921 Jiang et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110031566 Kim et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110089330 Thomas Apr 2011 A1
20110121179 Liddiard et al. May 2011 A1
20120003448 Weigel et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120025110 Davis et al. Feb 2012 A1
20130077761 Sipila Mar 2013 A1
20130089184 Sipila Apr 2013 A1
20130315380 Davis et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140127446 Davis et al. May 2014 A1
20140140487 Harker et al. May 2014 A1
20150016593 Larson et al. Jan 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (37)
Number Date Country
1030936 May 1958 DE
4430623 Mar 1996 DE
19818057 Nov 1999 DE
0297808 Jan 1989 EP
0330456 Aug 1989 EP
0400655 May 1990 EP
0676772 Mar 1995 EP
1252290 Nov 1971 GB
57082954 Aug 1982 JP
S6074253 Apr 1985 JP
S6089054 May 1985 JP
3170673 Jul 1991 JP
05066300 Mar 1993 JP
5135722 Jun 1993 JP
06119893 Jul 1994 JP
6289145 Oct 1994 JP
6343478 Dec 1994 JP
8315783 Nov 1996 JP
2001179844 Jul 2001 JP
2003007237 Jan 2003 JP
2003088383 Mar 2003 JP
2003510236 Mar 2003 JP
20033211396 Jul 2003 JP
4171700 Jun 2006 JP
2006297549 Nov 2006 JP
10-2005-0107094 Nov 2005 KR
WO9619738 Jun 1996 WO
WO96-19738 Jun 1996 WO
WO9965821 Dec 1999 WO
WO0009443 Feb 2000 WO
WO0017102 Mar 2000 WO
WO03076951 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2008052002 May 2008 WO
WO 2009009610 Jan 2009 WO
WO 2009045915 Apr 2009 WO
WO 2009085351 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2010107600 Sep 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (88)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 12/239,281, filed Sep. 26, 2008; Robert C. Davis; office action issued Dec. 13, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/814,912, filed Jun. 14, 2010; Degao Xu; office action issued Dec. 5, 2011.
Vajtai et al.; Building Carbon Nanotubes and Their Smart Architectures; Smart Mater. Struct. 2002; pp. 691-698; vol. 11.
PCT Application PCT/US2011/046371; filed Aug. 3, 2011; Steven Liddiard; International Search Report mailed Feb. 29, 2012.
Anderson et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/756,962, filed Jun. 1, 2007.
Barkan et al., “Improved window for low-energy x-ray transmission a Hybrid design for energy-dispersive microanalysis,” Sep. 1995, 2 pages, Ectroscopy 10(7).
Blanquart et al.; “XPAD, a New Read-out Pixel Chip for X-ray Counting”; IEEE Xplore; Mar. 25, 2009.
Chen, Xiaohua et al., “Carbon-nanotube metal-matrix composites prepared by electroless plating,” Composites Science and Technology, 2000, pp. 301-306, vol. 60.
Comfort, J. H., “Plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition of in situ doped epitaxial silicon at low temperatures,” J. Appl. Phys. 65, 1067 (1989).
Das, D. K., and K. Kumar, “Chemical vapor deposition of boron on a beryllium surface,” Thin Solid Films, 83(1), 53-60.
Das, K., and Kumar, K., “Tribological behavior of improved chemically vapor-deposited boron on beryllium,” Thin Solid Films, 108(2), 181-188.
Flahaut, E. et al., “Carbon Nanotube-metal-oxide nanocomposites; microstructure, electrical conductivity and mechanical properties,” Acta mater., 2000, pp. 3803-3812.Vo. 48.
Gevin, et al. IDe-XV1.0: Performances of a New CMOS Multi channer Analogue Readout ASIC for Cd (Zn) Te Detectors; IEEE 2005.
Grybos et al.; “DEDIX—Development of Fully Integrated Multichannel ASIC for High Count Rate Digital X-ray Imagining systems”; IEEE 2006; Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.
Grybos, “Pole-Zero Cancellations Circuit With Pulse Pile-Up Tracking System for Low Noise Charge-Sensitive Amplifiers”; Mar. 25, 2009; from IEEE Xplore.
Grybos, et al. “Measurements of Matching and High Count Rate Performance of Multichannel ASIC for Digital X-Ray Imaging Systems”; IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 54, No. 4, 2007.
Hanigofsky, J. A., K. L. More, and W. J. Lackey, “Composition and microstructure of chemically vapor-deposited boron nitride, aluminum nitride and boron nitride + aluminum nitride composites,” J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 74, 301 (1991).
http://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/xraytubescollidge/MachelettCW250.htm, 1999, 2 pgs.
Hutchison, “Vertically aligned carbon nanotubes as a framework for microfabrication of high aspect ration mems,” 2008, pp. 1-50.
Jiang, Linquin et al., “Carbon nanotubes-metal nitride composites; a new class of nanocomposites with enhanced electrical properties,” J. Mater. Chem., 2005, pp. 260-266, vol. 15.
Komatsu, S., and Y. Moriyoshi, “Influence of atomic hydrogen on the growth reactions of amorphous boron films in a low-pressure B.sub.2 H.sub.6 +He+H.sub.2 plasma”, J. Appl. Phys. 64, 1878 (1988).
Komatsu, S., and Y. Moriyoshi, “Transition from amorphous to crystal growth of boron films in plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition with B.sub.2 H.sub.6 +He,” J. Appl. Phys., 66, 466 (1989).
Komatsu, S., and Y. Moriyoshi, “Transition from thermal-to electron-impact decomposition of diborane in plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition of boron films from B.sub.2 H.sub.6 +He,” J. Appl. Phys. 66, 1180 (1989).
Lee, W., W. J. Lackey, and P. K. Agrawal, “Kinetic analysis of chemical vapor deposition of boron nitride,” J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 74, 2642 (1991).
Li, Jun et al., “Bottom-up approach for carbon nanotube interconnects,” Applied Physics Letters, Apr. 14, 2003, pp. 2491-2493, vol. 82 No. 15.
Lines, U.S. Appl. No. 12/352,864, filed Jan. 13, 2009.
Lines, U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,120, filed Mar. 17, 2010.
MA. R.Z., et al., “Processing and properties of carbon nanotubes-nano-SIC ceramic”, Journal of Materials Science 1998, pp. 5243-5246, vol. 33.
Maya, L., and L. A. Harris, “Pyrolytic deposition of carbon films containing nitrogen and/or boron,” J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 73, 1912 (1990).
Michaelidis, M., and R. Pollard, “Analysis of chemical vapor deposition of boron,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 1757 (1985).
Micro X-ray Tube Operation Manual, X-ray and Specialty Instruments Inc., 1996, 5 pages.
Moore, A. W., S. L. Strong, and G. L. Doll, “Properties and characterization of codeposited boron nitride and carbon materials,” J. Appl. Phys. 65, 5109 (1989).
Nakamura, K., “Preparation and properties of amorphous boron nitride films by molecular flow chemical vapor deposition,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 1757 (1985).
Panayiotatos, et al., “Mechanical performance and growth characteristics of boron nitride films with respect to their optical, compositional properties and density,” Surface and Coatings Technology, 151-152 (2002) 155-159.
PCT Application PCT/US08/65346; filed May 30, 2008; Keith Decker.
PCT Application PCT/US10/56011; filed Nov. 9, 2010; Krzysztof Kozaczek.
Peigney, et al., “Carbon nanotubes in novel ceramic matrix nanocomposites,” Ceramics International, 2000, pp. 677-683, vol. 26.
Perkins, F. K., R. A. Rosenberg, and L. Sunwoo, “Synchrotronradiation deposition of boron and boron carbide films from boranes and carboranes: decaborane,” J. Appl. Phys. 69,4103 (1991).
Powell et al., “Metalized polyimide filters for x-ray astronomy and other applications,” SPIE, pp. 432-440, vol. 3113.
Rankov. A. “A Novel Correlated Double Sampling Poly-Si Circuit for Readout System in Large Area X-Ray Sensors”, 2005.
Roca i Cabarrocas, P., S. Kumar, and B. Drevillon, “In situ study of the thermal decomposition of B.sub.2 H.sub.6 by combining spectroscopic ellipsometry and Kelvin probe measurements,” J. Appl. Phys. 66, 3286 (1989).
Satishkumar B.C., et al. “Synthesis of metal oxide nanorods using carbon nanotubes as templates,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2000, pp. 2115-2119, vol. 10.
Scholze et al., “Detection efficiency of energy-dispersive detectors with low-energy windows” X-Ray Spectrometry, X-Ray Spectrom, 2005: 34: 473-476.
Sheather, “The support of thin windows for x-ray proportional counters,” Journal Phys,E., Apr. 1973, pp. 319-322, vol. 6, No. 4.
Shirai, K., S.-I. Gonda, and S. Gonda, “Characterization of hydrogenated amorphous boron films prepared by electron cyclotron resonance plasma chemical vapor deposition method,” J. Appl. Phys. 67, 6286 (1990).
Tamura, et al. “Developmenmt of ASICs for CdTe Pixel and Line Sensors”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 52, No. 5, Oct. 2005.
Tien-Hui Lin et al., “An investigation on the films used as teh windows of ultra-soft X-ray counters.” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 276-283, May 1978, abstract only.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,154, filed Dec. 17, 2009; Krzysztof Kozaczek.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,120, filed Mar. 17, 2010; Michael Lines.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/783,707, filed May 20, 2010; Steven D. Liddiard.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/899,750, filed Oct. 7, 2010; Steven Liddiard.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/018,667, filed Feb. 1, 2011; Lei Pei.
Vandenbulcke, L. G., “Theoretical and experimental studies on the chemical vapor deposition of boron carbide,” Indust. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 24, 568 (1985).
Viitanen Veli-Pekka et al., Comparison of Ultrathin X-Ray Window Designs, presented at the Soft X-rays in the 21st Century Conference held in Provo, utah Feb. 10-13, 1993, pp. 182-190.
Wagner et al., “Effects of Scatter in Dual-Energy Imaging: An Alternative Analysis”; IEEE; Sep. 1989, vol. 8. No. 3.
Winter, J., H. G. Esser, and H. Reimer, “Diborane-free boronization,” Fusion Technol. 20, 225 (1991).
www.moxtek.com, Moxtek, Sealed Proportional Counter X-Ray Windows, Oct. 2007, 3 pages.
www.moxtek.com, Moxtek, AP3 Windows, Ultra-thin Polymer X-Ray Windows, Sep. 2006, 2 pages.
www.moxtek.com, Moxtek, DuraBeryllium X-Ray Windows, May 2007, 2 pages.
www.moxtek.com, Moxtek, ProLine Series 10 Windows, Ultra-thin Polymer X-Ray Windows, Sep. 2006, 2 pages.
www.moxtek.com, X-Ray Windows, ProLINE Series 20 Windows Ultra-thin Polymer X-ray Windows, 2 pages. Applicant believes that this product was offered for sale prior to the filing date of applicant's application.
Yan, Xing-Bin, et al., Fabrications of Three-Dimensional ZnO-Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Hybrids Using Self-Assembled CNT Micropatterns as Framework, 2007. pp. 17254-17259, vol. III.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,154, filed Dec. 17, 2009; Krzysztof Kozaczek; office action issued Apr. 26, 20111.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,154, filed Dec. 17, 2009; Krzysztof Kozaczek; office action issued Jun. 9, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,457, filed Mar. 19, 2009; Sterling W. Cornaby; office action issued Jun. 14, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,154, filed Dec. 17, 2009; Krzysztof Kozaczek; notice of allowance issued May 23, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/239,302, filed Sep. 26, 2008; Robert C. Davis; office action issued May 26, 2011.
Nakajima et al.; Trial Use of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Plastic as a Non-Bragg Window Material of X-Ray Transmission; Rev. Sci. Instrum.; Jul. 1989; pp. 2432-2435 ; vol. 60; No. 7.
Nakajima et al.; “Trial use of carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic as a non-Bragg window material of x-ray transmission”; Rev. Sci. Instrum 60 (7), Jul. 1989.
Coleman, et al.; “Small but strong: A review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube-polymer composites”; Carbon 44 (2006) 1624-1652.
Najafi, et al.; “Radiation resistant polymer-carbon nanotube nanocomposite thin films”; Department of Materials Science and Engineering . . . Nov. 21, 2004.
Wang, et al.; “Highly oriented carbon nanotube papers made of aligned carbon nanotubes”; Tsinghua-Foxconn Nanotechnology Research Center and Department of Physics; Published Jan. 31, 2008.
Xie, et al.; “Dispersion and alignment of carbon nanotubes in polymer matrix: A review”; Center for Advanced Materials Technology; Apr. 20, 2005.
Wu, et al.; “Mechanical properties and thermo-gravimetric analysis of PBO thin films”; Advanced Materials Laboratory, Institute of Electro-Optical Engineering; Apr. 30, 2006.
Coleman, et al.; “Mechanical Reinforcement of Polymers Using Carbon Nanotubes”; Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 689-706.
Zhang, et al.; “Superaligned Carbon Nanotube Grid for High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy of Nanomaterials”; 2008 American Chemical Society.
Hu, et al.; “Carbon Nanotube Thin Films: Fabrication, Properties, and Applications”; 2010 American Chemical Society Jul. 22, 2010.
Neyco, France,“SEM & TEM: Grids”;catalog; http://www.neyco.fr/pdf/Grids.pdf#page=1.
Hexcel Corporation; “Prepreg Technology” brochure; http://www.hexcel.com/Reso2882urces/DataSheets/Brochure-Data-Sheets/Prepreg—Technology.pdf.
ML3 Scientific; SpectrumXTM Ultrathin X-Ray Windows; as accessed on May 26, 2011; 3 pages.
Chakrapani et al.; Capillarity-Driven Assembly of Two-Dimensional Cellular Carbon Nanotube Foams; PNAS; Mar. 23, 2004; pp. 4009-4012; vol. 101; No. 12.
PCT Application PCT/US2010/056011; filed Nov. 9, 2010; Krzysztof Kozaczek; International Search Report mailed Jul. 13, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/783,707, filed May 20, 2010; Steven D. Liddiard; office action issued Jun. 22, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/239,281, filed Sep. 26, 2008; Robert C. Davis; office action issued May 24, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/209,862, filed Aug. 15, 2011; Sterling W. Cornaby; office action issued Oct. 9, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,531, filed Dec. 6, 2011; Steve Liddiard; office action dated Dec. 20, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/899,750, filed Oct. 7, 2010; Steven Liddiard; office action dated Oct. 15, 2012.
PCT application EP12167551.6; filed May 10, 2012: Robert C. Davis; European search report mailed Nov. 21, 2013.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120025110 A1 Feb 2012 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60995881 Sep 2007 US
61437792 Jan 2011 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 12239281 Sep 2008 US
Child 13018667 US
Parent 12899750 Oct 2010 US
Child 12239281 US