This invention relates to a sports support pole, and more particularly to a reinforced support structure for supporting a sports pole such as a basketball pole or the like.
When traveling through most neighborhoods, one can typically find a freestanding basketball hoop/backboard assembly erected in a neighborhood playground or adjacent to a residential driveway.
It is desirable to secure a support pole for such a freestanding backboard assembly as rigidly as possible in the ground to minimize or dampen out vibrations that are generated by a basketball striking the backboard assembly and/or the support pole. Toward this objective, the lower end of a freestanding support pole may be placed into the ground adjacent a playing surface while an upper end of the support pole supports the backboard assembly secured thereto. To further secure a support pole to the playing surface and provide additional safety, cement is often placed inside of the pole.
In some instances, the lower end of the support pole is encased in cement, asphalt, or the like to more securely maintain the support pole in a fixed and erect position. In other instances, the lower end of the support pole may be inserted into a ground sleeve securely fixed in the ground. The ground sleeve allows the pole to be as stable as a permanent in-ground pole, while still being removable as desired, such as for special occasions.
One incident of providing a rigidly fixed free standing support pole by any method is that the support pole is often left in the ground for long periods of time. During long periods of inclement weather, the support pole, typically made from cast iron, steel, or aluminum tubing (hereafter referred to as “metal”), is susceptible to rusting and/or corrosion that deteriorates the appearance and eventually the structural integrity of the metal. In some cases, the exposure to the weather or chemicals, such as pesticides and others, may result in holes or even rings of metal around the base of the support pole that have been eaten away by rusting and/or corrosion.
Additionally, support poles are often damaged by contact with lawn equipment, by vehicle collisions, and/or by stresses induced during play. In any case, if the metal of the support pole is damaged or its structural integrity is compromised by rust and/or corrosion, the pole may fall due to forces exerted on the damaged area during play.
Although a pole filled with cement provides additional weight and stability during play, the cement does not significantly reinforce the strength of the support pole if the base of the support pole has been compromised by rust and/or corrosion as discussed above. As one of ordinary skill in the art would understand, the concrete in the pole acts poorly in tension to reinforce the pole or resist the bending of the concrete within the pole at the location of the failure. In other words, if the metal pole fails at its base, the concrete inside simply snaps.
Although a pole with a much thicker wall thickness, or a solid metal pole may appear to provide the additional needed structural integrity, such a pole proves prohibitive due to costs and additional weight. Not only is the cost of manufacturing a thicker pole more expensive, but also the additional weight significantly increases production, handling, and shipping costs. Further, the effort required to assemble a thicker pole is beyond the abilities of the average consumer.
Furthermore, simply including additional wall thickness of all support poles fails to provide the consumer with the option, significantly increasing the cost of the product with little if any increased value to the consumer. While some environments are especially corrosive, where additional structural support is desired, other environments do not require additional structural support in order to prolong the life of the support pole. For example, the outdoor backyard basketball court may benefit from additional structural support due to its exposure to inclement weather and time. However, the inclusion of heavy, difficult-to-assemble support poles for an indoor basketball court is overkill.
Therefore, there is a need for a reinforced sports pole that is selectable for the environmental conditions and provides additional support during a failure of the sports pole.
This invention relates to a sports support pole, and more particularly to a reinforced support structure for supporting a pole such as a basketball pole or the like.
One embodiment of the present invention may include a reinforced sports support structure comprising a substantially hollow sports pole for supporting a sports apparatus above a playing surface with the hollow sports pole forming a cavity and having a central axis. The support structure may include at least one support bar having a first end and a second end with the at least one support bar further including a first portion and a second portion. The support structure may also include at least one spacer configured to be inserted along with the at least one support bar into the cavity of the support pole to substantially secure the at least one support bar in a predetermined position. Wherein, the at least one spacer maintains the predetermined position of the at least one support bar as the cavity of the sports pole is at least partially filled with a fill material such that the at least one support bar is substantially encased in the fill material and wherein the first portion, including the first end, is positioned below the playing surface and a second portion, including the second end, is positioned above the playing surface.
Another embodiment of the present invention may include a method for reinforcing a hollow sports pole forming a cavity with the method comprising the steps of attaching at least one spacer to at least one support bar, the at least one support bar including a first end and a second end and a first portion and a second portion. The steps may include inserting the at least one support bar and the at least one spacer into the cavity of the sports pole with the at least one spacer being configured to maintain the at least one support bar in a predetermined position within the sports pole. The steps may also include maintaining the at least one support bar in the predetermined position while filling at least a portion of the cavity of the sports pole with a fill material such that the at least one support bar is substantially encased in the fill material and placing the sports pole such that the first portion, including the first end, is positioned below a playing surface and a second portion, including the second end, is positioned above the playing surface.
These and other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description, the accompanying drawings and the appended claims.
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the present invention, it is believed the same will be better understood from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, in a non-limiting fashion, the best mode presently contemplated for carrying out the present invention, and in which like reference numerals designate like parts throughout the Figures, wherein:
The present disclosure will now be described more fully with reference to the Figures in which various embodiments of the present invention are shown. The subject matter of this disclosure may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as being limited to the embodiments set forth herein.
The system shown in
Once the cement 205 is cured, the entire system may be placed in the ground 208. For the purpose of this specification, the ground may refer to the earth literally or any material or construction suitable for forming a playing surface and/or supporting the support pole. For example, the ground 208 may refer to a concrete or asphalt outdoor basketball court, where the basketball court may or may not extend down to the earth below. However, the ground 208 may also refer to a wooden floor basketball court or other construction with structural support beneath. Once the support pole 202 is securely retained in the ground 208, the backboard assembly 18, as discussed with reference to
Referring to the embodiment shown in
A support bar in position 204A experiences significantly less tension, during a failure of the support pole 202 in the direction of Arrow F, than a support bar at position 204B or 204C. As a consequence, the support bar in position 204A, due to its proximity to location 21, fails to significantly resist the failure of the pole 202 in the direction of Arrow F, shown in
However, if the failure depicted in
Although the support bar positions 204A, 204B, and 204C does suggest that simply lining the inner circumference with support bars would optimize the reinforcement of the support pole in any direction, this configuration is impractical due to cost and weight increases. The additional required support bars increases the costs of production for the numerous support bars, the costs of shipping the additional weight and size of the numerous support bars, and the difficulty of assembling, proving this configuration impractical and cost prohibitive.
However, it should be understood that simply placing a support bar 204 within the support pole 202 and filling the pole with cement is insufficient to practice the present invention because the support bar 204 will not remain substantially positioned on the axial center of the pole 202. As discussed, for a single support bar, the optimized position of the support bar 204 is on the axial center of the pole 202. From the axial center, the support bar 204 may provide additional structural support and reduce the rate of descent of the pole upon failure in any direction. However, attempting to balance or to hold the support bar 204 manually on the axial center while the pole is filled with cement is difficult if not impossible. Likewise, attempting to adjust the support pole 204 manually after the pole has been filled is equally difficult and also difficult to verify.
In testing the traditional configuration, the support pole 302, filled with cement, was circumferentially cut at the base 301 to simulate weathered and rusted conditions of a structurally compromised support pole. The support pole 302 was cut such that only three small pieces of material, measuring only a 0.25-inch wide and equally spaced around the pole, were left supporting the basketball goal along with the cement (not shown). Under the configuration shown in
In
In
The test results indicate that locating a support bar substantially in the axial center of a support pole provides both additional reinforcement against failure and increases the time the support pole takes to fall during failure, effectively reducing or eliminating the rate of descent of the basketball goal. Although the configuration shown in
Referring back to
The spacers 201, 206 may be formed as a single molded element or may be multiple elements attached together. Further, the spacers 201, 206 may be constructed of plastic, polypropylene, nylon, metal, wood, or various other materials known to one of skill in the art. It should be understood, however, that the spacers 201, 206 need only to be strong enough to maintain the position of the support bar 204 during the pouring of the cement and until the cement is cured.
As shown in
Referring to
Although, in the embodiments shown in
As shown by the testing, the optimal position for a support bar is directly opposite from the direction of the failure or fall, shown as position 204C in
While
As shown in
In addition to using the support structure of the present invention for supporting a basketball goal, it is envisioned that the present invention can be utilized as a support structure for other types of support poles. This may include support poles for volleyball nets, soccer goals, flagpoles or the like. Thus, the use of the invention in a basketball support pole is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention.
The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention are presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Obviously, many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. While the embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention, various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use are also possible. The scope of the invention is to be defined only by the claims appended hereto, and by their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
87015 | Varian | Feb 1869 | A |
225683 | Bragy | Mar 1880 | A |
432043 | Heiland | Jul 1890 | A |
592660 | Miller | Oct 1897 | A |
611568 | Dohme | Feb 1898 | A |
753709 | Jones | Mar 1904 | A |
771042 | Calkins | Sep 1904 | A |
837820 | Folsom | Dec 1906 | A |
841064 | Stanley | Jan 1907 | A |
849922 | Scofield | Apr 1907 | A |
982380 | Martin | Jan 1911 | A |
1008210 | Skinner | Nov 1911 | A |
1095197 | Entenmann | May 1914 | A |
1564109 | Ponsolle | Dec 1925 | A |
1606697 | Dean | Nov 1926 | A |
1611935 | Mitchell | Dec 1926 | A |
1799314 | Ptaff | Apr 1931 | A |
2194779 | Albach | Mar 1940 | A |
2283987 | Hammer | May 1942 | A |
D139311 | Gibson | Oct 1944 | S |
2888111 | Evans | May 1959 | A |
2932511 | Bemis | Jan 1960 | A |
2945659 | McDonald | Jul 1960 | A |
2985261 | Kubesh | May 1961 | A |
3170721 | Wells | Feb 1965 | A |
3292335 | Stober | Dec 1966 | A |
3318560 | Garrette, Jr. et al. | May 1967 | A |
3342444 | Nelson | Sep 1967 | A |
3417525 | Dashio | Dec 1968 | A |
3544110 | Dickinson | Dec 1970 | A |
3586324 | Bearson | Jun 1971 | A |
3671738 | Beachley | Jun 1972 | A |
3765676 | Bearson | Oct 1973 | A |
3783574 | Cennerelli | Jan 1974 | A |
3843079 | Reisling | Oct 1974 | A |
4279104 | Classen | Jul 1981 | A |
4307887 | Weiss | Dec 1981 | A |
4395040 | White | Jul 1983 | A |
4465277 | Rolffs | Aug 1984 | A |
4522394 | Broussard | Jun 1985 | A |
4634422 | Cramblett | Jan 1987 | A |
4801142 | Friesen | Jan 1989 | A |
4869501 | Anastasakis | Sep 1989 | A |
4881734 | Nye | Nov 1989 | A |
4940232 | Chen | Jul 1990 | A |
4999966 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5037093 | Roark | Aug 1991 | A |
5211393 | Rolffs | May 1993 | A |
5316315 | Roark | May 1994 | A |
5337989 | Apple | Aug 1994 | A |
5347787 | Gavin | Sep 1994 | A |
5398478 | Gordin et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5417511 | Warden | May 1995 | A |
5492429 | Hodges | Feb 1996 | A |
5571229 | Fitzsimmons | Nov 1996 | A |
5704188 | Coulis | Jan 1998 | A |
5752349 | Fitzsimmons et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758857 | Gray | Jun 1998 | A |
5822946 | Rasmussen | Oct 1998 | A |
6385938 | Gavin | May 2002 | B1 |
6571526 | Queen | Jun 2003 | B2 |
20020007613 | Gordin et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070049429 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |