The present disclosure is generally related to syntactic foam systems and specifically related to syntactic foam systems configured to encase, support and remediate an underlying structural substrate.
In the construction industry, maintaining the strength of load bearing support members is a key consideration. Throughout the World, steel and concrete structures are exposed to harsh environmental and working conditions. Steel, concrete, and other common materials may be damaged and deteriorate from being exposed to harsh environmental conditions or rough working conditions. For example, concrete may experience spalling or cracking and steel may corrode from being exposed to the environment. Additionally, concrete, steel, and other materials also may experience wear and impacts by foreign objects as a function of their use in applications where rough working conditions are experienced. In the mining industry, for example, a stockpile cover in a gold mine is impacted with rocks and other abrasive materials, thus maintaining the strength of load bearing support members of the stockpile cover is a key consideration. The need for maintenance of the strength of load bearing support members is common in numerous other structural applications. Corrosion, abrasion, and other environmental conditions may cause holes, a reduction in thickness, or other damage and wear that reduce the strength and efficacy of the support members.
Existing encasement, wrapping, or jacket-type support member protection solutions in the industry address ductility or axial capacity of a support member via confinement or protection against future corrosion. For example, the use of a glass or carbon fiber composite wrapped around a concrete column. The fiberglass composite thus provides reinforcement and improves the axial capacity of short columns and eliminates the brittle failure mode of the concrete by confinement. However, existing jacket-type support member protection systems offer no lightweight solution to address stability or buckling capacity of a support member, especially long structural members where design capacity is controlled by buckling. Additionally, existing solutions are often non-structural and merely serve as a protective barrier for a damaged support member.
Thus, there is a continual need for methods and systems which reinstate the structural capacity and protect deteriorated support members as well as offer solutions to address stability and buckling capacity of a support member.
Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to syntactic foam systems and specifically syntactic foam systems configured to encase and support an underlying structural substrate.
In accordance with an embodiment, a reinforced syntactic structure is disclosed. The reinforced syntactic structure includes an underlying structural substrate having an outer surface and at least one reinforcement shell. The reinforcement shell includes at least one low density syntactic foam shell layer and at least one rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin coupled to the syntactic foam shell layer. The syntactic foam shell layer encases at least a portion of the outer surface of the underlying structural substrate and has an unconfined compressive strength of about 500 to about 20,000 psi. Additionally, the syntactic foam shell layer includes at least two opposing subshells wrapped around the underlying structural substrate. Each opposing subshell has at least two ends attached to two respective ends of at least one of the remaining opposing subshells. Further, the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin has a Young's modulus of 10 GPa to 250 GPa. The rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin includes at least two opposing skin sections attached to the at least two opposing subshells respectively. Each opposing skin section includes at least two ends attached to two respective ends of at least one of the remaining opposing skin sections. Finally, the syntactic foam shell layer is formed with hollow microspheres, also known as microballoons, disposed within a thermosetting or thermoplastic resin matrix.
In accordance with another embodiment, a reinforcement shell is disclosed. The reinforcement shell includes at least one syntactic foam shell layer configured to encase at least a portion of an outer surface of an underlying structural substrate. The syntactic foam shell layer has an unconfined compressive strength of about 500 to about 20,000 psi. Further, the syntactic foam shell layer includes at least two opposing subshells configured to wrap around the underlying structural substrate, wherein each opposing subshell has at least two ends attached to two respective ends of at least one of the remaining opposing subshells. The reinforced syntactic structure also includes at least one rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin coupled to the syntactic foam shell layer. The rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin has a Young's modulus of 10 GPa to 250 GPa. Additionally, the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin includes at least two opposing skin sections attached to the at least two opposing subshells respectively, wherein each opposing skin section comprises at least two ends attached to two respective ends of at least one of the remaining opposing skin sections. Finally, the syntactic foam shell layer is formed from hollow microspheres disposed within a thermosetting or thermoplastic resin matrix.
In accordance with yet another embodiment, a method of encasing an underlying structural substrate to improve stability is disclosed. The method of encasing an underlying structural substrate to improve stability includes attaching at least one reinforcement shell around the underlying structural substrate by joining at least two opposing subshells, thereby enclosing the underlying structural substrate. The reinforcement shell includes at least one syntactic foam shell layer formed from at least two opposing subshells and at least one rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin coupled to the syntactic foam shell layer. Each opposing subshell includes at least two ends attached to two respective ends of at least one of the remaining opposing subshells. Further the at least one syntactic foam shell layer has an unconfined compressive strength of about 500 to about 20,000 psi. Additionally, the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin includes at least two opposing skin sections attached to the at least two opposing subshells respectively. Each opposing skin section has at least two ends attached to two respective ends of at least one of the remaining opposing skin sections. Further, the at least one rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin coupled to the syntactic foam shell layer has a Young's modulus of 10 GPa to 250 GPa. The method also includes securing the at least one reinforcement shell around the underlying structural substrate by joining the at least two ends of the syntactic foam layer opposing subshells together, fastening or welding the at least two ends of the opposing skin sections together, and adhering an inner surface of the syntactic foam layer to an outer surface of the underlying structural substrate.
The following detailed description of specific embodiments of the present disclosure can be best understood when read in conjunction with the drawings enclosed herewith.
The embodiments set forth in the drawings are illustrative in nature and not intended to be limiting of the invention defined by the claims. Moreover, individual features of the drawings will be more fully apparent and understood in view of the detailed description.
Referring to
The at least one syntactic foam shell layer 100 includes at least two attached opposing subshells 110A, 110B wrapped around the underlying structural substrate 50. Each opposing subshell 110A comprises at least two ends 115A, 117A attached to two respective ends 115B, 117B of the other opposing subshell 110B.
In embodiments, the ends 115A, 117A, 115B, 117B of the opposing subshells 110A, 110B of the syntactic foam shell layer 100 are joined together. In at least one embodiment, the ends 115A, 117A, 115B, 117B of the opposing subshells 110A, 110B of the syntactic foam shell layer 100 are adhered together with an adhesive at an interface 140 of the respective ends (115A/115B, 117A/117B). As it is being utilized in a support structure, the adhesive must have sufficient strength. In embodiments, the adhesive may have a lap shear strength of 500 psi to 4,400 psi, or about 2,000 psi to 4,000 psi. Two specific, non-limiting, exemplary acrylic adhesives includes 3M DP825 (3M Company, St. Paul, Minn., USA) and Extreme Adhesives 5375HS (Extreme Adhesives, Inc., Raymond, N.H., USA). In further embodiments, the ends of the opposing subshells 110A, 110B of the syntactic foam shell layer 100 are joined together by a mechanical fastener.
The at least one syntactic foam shell layer 100 demonstrates an unconfined compressive strength of about 500 to about 20,000 psi. In further embodiments, the syntactic foam shell layer 100 has an unconfined compressive strength of about 1,000 to about 11,500 psi.
Additionally as shown in
The rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 may comprise stainless steel, galvanized steel, or aluminum. Alternatively, the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 may comprise carbon fiber reinforced or glass fiber reinforced polymer composite. The rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 may have yield strength of 30,000 psi to 400,000 psi, or from 30,000 psi to 75,000 psi, or about 30,000 psi to 50,000 psi.
The rigidity of the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 is beneficial in providing buckling resistance. The syntactic foam shell layer 100 without the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 may be too elastic. The axial capacity of the reinforced syntactic structure 1 is influenced by the buckling resistance of the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120, the reinforcement shell 80 combining the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 and the syntactic foam shell layer 100, and the reinforced syntactic structure 1 as a whole. In the present embodiment, the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 may have a Young's modulus of 10 GPa to 250 GPa, or from 60 GPa to 210 GPa.
As shown in
The rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 is attached to the syntactic foam opposing subshells 110A, 110B by an adhesive 150 to form a reinforcement shell 80. In addition to the adhesive 150, the opposing skin sections 120A, 120B of the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 may also be attached to the syntactic foam opposing subshells 110A, 110B by fasteners such as bolts, screws, or combinations thereof. Additionally, the opposing subshells 110A, 110B of the syntactic foam shell layer 100 may also be fastened together, either with the fastener of the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 or another fastener.
The encasing of the underlying structural substrate 50 as depicted in
With reference to
The underlying structural substrate 50 may comprise various structures, for example, a tube, beam, pillar, column, plate, strut, pipe, tank, or pressure vessel. The underlying structural substrate 50 may also comprise various materials including metal, concrete, wood, masonry, or combinations thereof, and generally are structures more susceptible to harsh environmental conditions.
Various structures and dimensions are also contemplated for the opposing subshells 110A, 110B and opposing skin sections 120A, 120B of the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120. The strength required and the shape of the underlying structural substrate 50 encased by the opposing subshells 110A, 110B and opposing skin sections 120A, 120B dictate the shape of the opposing subshells 110A, 110B and opposing skin sections 120A, 120B. As shown in
Additionally, with reference to
Attachment of the syntactic foam shell layer 100 to the underlying structural substrate 50 with adhesive 150 provides load transfer between the underlying structural substrate 50 and the syntactic foam shell layer 100. The combination of the syntactic foam shell layer 100 and the underlying structural substrate 50 adhered together provides a composite structure. The adhesive 150 utilized to secure the reinforcement shell 80 comprising the syntactic foam shell layer 100 and the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 to the outer surface of the underlying structural substrate 50 must meet a series of performance requirements. Specifically, the adhesive connection should be capable of long-term adhesive loading sufficient to support the dead load of the reinforcement shell 80. Additionally, the adhesive connection should be capable of increased short-term adhesive loading which accounts for the forces of high wind or other environmental effects causing deflection within the structure. Additionally, the adhesive 150 should be capable of withstanding a variety of temperature ranges to allow for placement of the reinforced syntactic structure 1 in a range of environmental conditions. The syntactic material of the syntactic foam shell layer 100 is an insulating material and will naturally provide an insulative barrier between ambient temperatures and the adhesive interface 150 at the junction of the syntactic foam shell layer 100 and the underlying structural substrate 50. However, the adhesive interface 150 between the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 and the syntactic foam shell layer 100 is not provided the same insulative barrier.
Various adhesive compositions are contemplated herein. In one embodiment, the adhesive 150 is different compositionally than the resin matrix compositions of the syntactic foam described below. Without being bound by theory, using a different stronger adhesive at the syntactic interface may bolster the mechanical strength of the reinforced syntactic structure 1. For example, and not by way of limitation, the adhesive 150 may comprise epoxy, urethane, acrylate, or combinations thereof. In one embodiment, acrylic adhesives may be used as they demonstrate high strength and stiffness as well as the ability to bond to imperfectly prepared steel surfaces, including those with residual oil or contaminants in small quantities. Additionally, the acrylic adhesive may provide resistance to chemical attack. Two specific, non-limiting, exemplary acrylic adhesives includes 3M DP825 (3M Company, St. Paul, Minn., USA) and Extreme Adhesives 5375HS (Extreme Adhesives, Inc., Raymond, N.H., USA).
As stated above, the reinforcement shell 80 may be able to support a structural load. The syntactic foam shell layer 100 may have a compressive strength of 500 to 20,000 psi, or about 1,000 to 11,500 psi. The syntactic foam shell layer 100 may have a dielectric constant of 1.5 to 10, or about 2.0 to 6.0. The syntactic foam shell layer 100 may have a tensile strength of 1,000 to 6,000 psi, or about 1,500 to 5,000. Further, the syntactic foam shell layer 100 may have a flexural strength of 500 to 8,000 psi, or about 2,000 to 5500 psi.
Further, the syntactic foam shell layer 100 may comprise hollow microspheres disposed within a resin matrix. The hollow microspheres may comprise glass, polymer, ceramic, or combinations thereof, and the resin matrix may comprise cyanate ester, silicone, epoxy, vinyl ester, polyester, polyurethane, phenolic or combinations thereof. In addition to these primary ingredients, the resin matrix may also comprise other resin modifiers, for example, flame retardants, viscosity modifiers, fillers, colorants, or combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the viscosity modifiers comprise fumed silica. In another embodiment, the fillers comprise carbon black, carbon nanofibers, carbon nanotubes, chopped glass fibers, polymer fibers, ceramic particles such as silica, alumina, silicon carbide, aluminum nitride, or ceramic nanoparticles. While the specific industrial application may dictate the compositional amounts, the syntactic foam panel may comprise about 12 to about 36% by wt. hollow microspheres and about 64 to about 88% by wt. resin matrix. In a further embodiment, the syntactic foam shell layer 100 comprises about 12 to about 18% by wt. hollow microspheres. One suitable commercial embodiment of syntactic foam for the syntactic foam shell layer 100 is the Advantic® syntactic foam product, e.g., the Advantic 30D product produced by Cornerstone Research Group. The syntactic foam shell layer 100 may have various sizes and thicknesses depending on the industrial application utilized. In an exemplary embodiment, the thickness may range from about 0.25 to about 6 inches, or from about 0.5 to about 3 inches Further, the glass hollow microspheres may have a density range from 0.10 g/cc to 0.85 g/cc, or from 0.10 to 0.63 g/cc, or from 0.125 g/cc to 0.46 g/cc. Alternatively, glass hollow microspheres may have a crush strength of 250 to 16000 psi and an average diameter of microspheres ranging from 10 micron to 85 microns, or from 20 to 85 microns.
The combination of the high tensile strength rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 and the thick, lightweight, high compressive strength polymer syntactic foam shell layer 100 adhered structurally on the underlying structural substrate 50 (underlying structure to be remediated) provides additional benefits. As previously discussed, the underlying structure serving as the underlying structural substrate 50 can be columns, beams, and plates for example. Other existing jacket-type support member protection solutions in the industry address ductility or axial capacity of the support member via confinement or protection against future corrosion. For example, the use of glass or carbon fiber composite to wrap around a concrete column. The confinement improves axial capacity of short columns and eliminates the brittle failure mode of the concrete. However, existing jacket-type support member protection systems offer no solution to address stability or buckling capacity of a support member, especially long structural members where design capacity is controlled by buckling.
Embodiments of the present disclosure combine a rigid skin in the form of the rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 and a high compressive strength syntactic layer in the form of the syntactic foam shell layer 100 to address stability or buckling capacity. Improving the inherent geometric robustness or area moment of inertia of a given cross section loaded in axial compression and/or flexure improve the stability or buckling capacity of the underlying structural substrate 50 by increasing the allowable capacities for Euler buckling, flexural-torsional buckling, and lateral-torsional buckling. In addition, such arrangement improves the plate stability when the underlying structural substrate 50 is in the form of a plate. This is accomplished by increasing the ability of the cross section to resist local or global lateral deflection under axial load, i.e. via improvement in the moment of inertia. The improvement can be understood by considering the Euler Buckling Equation (column capacity under axial load only), Equation (1):
wherein F=critical vertical load on the column, E=modulus of elasticity, I=area moment of inertia of cross section of the column, K=column effective length factor, and L=unsupported length of column. From Equation (1), the critical load capacity can be increased by increasing I as L and K can be considered as constants in a remediation scenario and E is dominated by the underlying structure in such scenario. Since I is a function of the distance of the material volume from the neutral axis, the attachment of reinforcement shell disclosed in this invention onto the underlying structure will lead to increase in I, and resulting in improved the load capacity F of the structure.
Further, as a secondary improvement mechanism, the combination of the high tensile strength rigid non-corrosive stiffening skin 120 with the high compressive strength syntactic foam shell layer 100 also improves the hoop stress capacity of the remediated structure by the introduction of additional continuous and stiff material available to resist load. Furthermore, since the syntactic foam of the syntactic foam shell layer 100 can act as an energy absorber via crushing of the resin matrix and hollow microspheres therein, the reinforcement shell 80 placed over the underlying structural substrate 50 can improve impact resistance, ductility, and abrasion resistance in addition to being corrosion resistant.
Referring to
The reinforcement shell 80 of the reinforced syntactic structure 1, as shown in
Unlike other jacket-type support member protection solutions that are used in the construction industry, which are often non-structural, the reinforced syntactic structure 1 of the present disclosure has been shown to provide quantified engineering improvement to the stability of existing steel or concrete structures/components/members when compared to the underlying structure alone.
Existing structures are located around the World with concrete or steel structural components or members. Over time and through natural usage and wear the structures experience damage and structural weakening. Placement of the reinforcement shell 80 over the existing structure to form the reinforced syntactic structure 1 allows for the existing structure to be strengthened and remain in service. For example, a stockpile cover 200 for use in a gold mine, as illustrated in
It is further noted that terms like “preferably,” “generally,” “commonly,” and “typically” are not utilized herein to limit the scope of the claimed invention or to imply that certain features are critical, essential, or even important to the structure or function of the claimed invention. Rather, these terms are merely intended to highlight alternative or additional features that may or may not be utilized in a particular embodiment of the present disclosure.
It will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of the disclosure defined in the appended claims. More specifically, although some aspects of the present disclosure are identified herein as preferred or particularly advantageous, it is contemplated that the present disclosure is not necessarily limited to these aspects.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Application Ser. No. 62/021,485 filed Jul. 7, 2014, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/039366 | 7/7/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/007503 | 1/14/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2636354 | Glassgold | Apr 1953 | A |
3736759 | Blose | Jun 1973 | A |
4019301 | Fox | Apr 1977 | A |
4058985 | Liddell | Nov 1977 | A |
4244156 | Watts, Jr. | Jan 1981 | A |
4464082 | Isaacs | Aug 1984 | A |
5505030 | Michalcewiz et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
6827110 | Watkins | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7744314 | Eide | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8281545 | Choi | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8443896 | Howard | May 2013 | B2 |
8628275 | Trader et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8713891 | Carr | May 2014 | B2 |
20010043991 | Watkins | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030000152 | Ryan | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030085482 | Sincock et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20110017340 | Mirossay et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20130084433 | Ernst | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0370147 | May 1990 | EP |
2211003 | Jul 2010 | EP |
58123927 | Jul 1983 | JP |
2010074680 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2013102274 | Jul 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion pertaining to PCT/US2015/039366 dated Sep. 4, 2015. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability pertaining to PCT/US2015/039366 dated Jan. 10, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170211254 A1 | Jul 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62021485 | Jul 2014 | US |