The present invention relates generally to an improved system for stabilizing retaining wall structures, and particularly retaining wall structures which comprise a plurality of individual blocks stacked in an array of superimposed rows. More particularly, the present invention relates to improved connector devices which provide and facilitate attachment between selected individual blocks and a remotely positioned stable anchoring assembly. By way of explanation, the stable anchoring assembly may typically be in the form of a geogrid, mesh, deadman, or the like, with the anchoring assembly normally being disposed in on-site soils which typically contain corrosion inducing salts and the like.
Retaining walls are in general use for a wide variety of applications, including virtually any application where it is necessary to hold or retain earth to prevent erosion or undesired washing of a sloped surface or for general landscaping purposes. Examples of such applications further include retaining walls designed for configuring contours for various landscaping projects, as well as those for protecting surfaces of roadways, walkways, or the like from eroded soil and earth. Because of their physical structure and for protection of the wall from excessive hydrostatic pressures, the wall is normally separated from on-site soils by a buffer zone of clean granular backfill, such as, for example, crushed rock, binder rock, or the like. Such buffer zones assist in drainage, while at the same time assist in reducing hydrostatic pressure against the wall.
In order to achieve proper stabilization of the erected retaining wall, a geogrid, deadman, wire mesh system, or other anchoring means buried remotely from the retaining wall and disposed within the on-site soil is utilized to positionably stabilize, hold, or otherwise restrain individual blocks or groups of blocks forming the array against movement or motion. Selected blocks comprising the wall are coupled to the anchoring means. Various forms of coupling means have been utilized in the past, they have typically been designed to be captured within the block structure, and thereafter fixed directly to the anchoring means. Little, if any, length adjustment has been possible in the coupling means, thereby making the interconnection less than convenient. As such, the ultimate interconnecting operation can be time consuming due to the necessity of configuring coupling means to fit the block wall. Also in those coupling devices which are permanently fixed to the block, pallet stacking densities of blocks to be shipped may be reduced. The present invention facilitates the interconnection process by utilizing a coupling means which includes a standard keeper frame together with elongated couplers of adjustable or assorted lengths. Individual blocks comprising the retaining wall structure are provided with a hollow core along with an access bore extending from the rear block surface to the inner wall of the core. This arrangement makes it possible to utilize a single block structure which may be tightly palletized as any standard block design, with the block having a structure which facilitates secure attachment of the coupling means to individual blocks, with the coupling means being, in turn, produced conveniently in selective and appropriate lengths for ready attachment or fastening to the stable anchoring assembly.
In accordance with the present invention, a coupling means for securing individual blocks in a retaining wall to a stable remote anchoring assembly. The coupling means includes a keeper device with an elongated fastener having one end secured to the keeper frame, and with the opposed end being linked to the anchoring assembly. The individual blocks are hollow core structures having bores extending from the rear wall surface through the web of the block into the hollow core. The keeper assemblies are designed to receive and retain the elongated fastener therewithin. The keeper frame is sized for retention within the block core, while various lengths of fasteners are provided to achieve and facilitate the interconnection between individual blocks and the stable anchoring assembly. The fasteners may be length adjustable in order to facilitate or accommodate taut or tight interconnects. In this fashion, a stabilized retaining wall is formed with a universal coupler means being provided, the coupling means employing a standard keeper frame along with elongated couplers of a variety of lengths.
Therefore, it is a primary object of the present invention to provide an improved interconnection between individual blocks in a retaining wall structure and a remotely positioned or disposed stable anchoring assembly.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide an improved interconnection system for use in joining individual blocks of a retaining wall to a remotely positioned stable anchoring assembly such as, for example, a geogrid, wire mesh, or dead-man.
Other and further objects of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon a study of the following specification, appended claims, and accompanying drawings.
In accordance with one preferred embodiment of the present invention, and with particular attention being directed to
Blocks 11 are provided with an access bore 15 which extends through the block from the rear surface to the surfaces of the wall comprising the hollow core. As further indicated in
In as much as the on-site soils typically contain moisture and salts, galvanic or electrolytic corrosion typically occurs within metallic components buried or otherwise immersed in the soil. The galvanic corrosive action is accelerated and/or supported if the on-site soils are permitted to make contact with the rear surfaces of the individual blocks, with the area adjacent the blocks being characterized as the “corrosive front”. Thus, deterioration of any metallic components disposed in close proximity to the interface between the block wall and on-site soils may suffer rapid deterioration. In order to reduce the level of activity of the corrosive front, and increase the life of metallic components disposed therearound, the utilization of clean granular fill has been found to be helpful but never sufficient to eliminate the problem. However, because of the nature of certain soils, taken together with the salts present in the individual blocks, coupling means may be provided to link individual blocks to the stable anchoring assembly which are non-metallic and thus generally immune from corrosive action. In these situations, there remains a need for clean granular backfill, particularly for reduction and/or elimination of hydrostatic forces which may otherwise develop if saturated on-site soils are permitted to remain in contact with the retaining wall structure. In accordance with the present invention, however, the retaining wall is provided with additional stabilizing features through the utilization of coupling means which conveniently link the blocks to a remotely disposed stable anchoring assembly.
With attention now being directed to
Each fastener 27 has a proximal end 30 and a distal end 31 comprises a central body segment 29 interposed between the proximal and distal ends. Body segment 29 extends through and distally of block 11, passing through access bore 15 formed in the rear web of block 11. Distal end 31 is configured to engage or otherwise be secured to a suitable anchoring point in one of the geogrids 22—22. Thus, distal end 31 comprises an anchoring assembly attachment means.
With attention now being directed to
In those situations where the distance between the rear surface of the block wall and the anchoring assembly may vary, elongated fastener means 27 may more conveniently consist of a material such as reinforced nylon, which may be knotted and/or otherwise formed to length, whereby convenient attachment to geogrid or steel mesh may be achieved. In order to accommodate random length requirements of the fastener means, one convenient technique is to loop a length of line from the keeper device through an opening in the geogrid (or mesh) and then back to and through access bore 15, whereby the proximal end may be secured by a cable clamping device for a cable or a knot arrangement for materials such as reinforced nylon.
Thus, it will be observed that the coupling means of the present invention provide a simple means by which a hollow cored block may be positively connected to a stable anchoring assembly. Additionally, the coupling means may be used in a variety of applications from steel ladder reinforced soil structures to positive connections with geogrid reinforcements, certain soil nails may be used as well. The connection means resist localized corrosion without requiring use of costly components such as those fabricated from stainless steel, coated or hot-dipped high carbon steel, or the like. Galvanic protection is readily achieved, along with versatility of coupling length.
As shown in
It will be appreciated that various modifications may be made to the techniques of the present invention, it being further understood that the examples given herein are for purposes of illustration only and are not to be construed as a limitation upon the scope to which the invention is otherwise entitled.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
RE28977 | Mason | Sep 1976 | E |
4050254 | Meheen et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4266890 | Hilfiker | May 1981 | A |
4391557 | Hilfiker et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4703602 | Pardo | Nov 1987 | A |
4728227 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4909010 | Gravier | Mar 1990 | A |
4952098 | Grayson et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5028172 | Wilson et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5046898 | McKinney | Sep 1991 | A |
5066169 | Gavin et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5127770 | Ditcher et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5326193 | Peterson | Jul 1994 | A |
5468098 | Babcock | Nov 1995 | A |
5484235 | Hilfiker et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5487623 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5507599 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5522682 | Egan | Jun 1996 | A |
5551809 | Forsberg | Sep 1996 | A |
5551810 | Franceski et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5586841 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5624211 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5642968 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5671584 | Mueller | Sep 1997 | A |
5778622 | Baker | Jul 1998 | A |
5795106 | Herd | Aug 1998 | A |
5807030 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5860771 | Ditcher et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5921715 | Rainey | Jul 1999 | A |
5975810 | Taylor et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6050748 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050749 | Khamis | Apr 2000 | A |
6079908 | Anderson | Jun 2000 | A |
6089792 | Khamis | Jul 2000 | A |
6113317 | Myers | Sep 2000 | A |
6152655 | Hull | Nov 2000 | A |
6168351 | Rainey et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6224295 | Price et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238144 | Babcock | May 2001 | B1 |
6338597 | Rainey | Jan 2002 | B1 |
20010014255 | Orsat | Aug 2001 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030070385 A1 | Apr 2003 | US |